Skip to main content

Mennonites: Highly Attractive and Desired Seedlings, 1943-44

Mennonites can appreciate an orderly garden, but SS-Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler’s vision of a racial garden for annexed Poland—i.e., for Germanic peoples alone—was criminal and murderous. The new Warthegau province was to be a “Pflanzgarten (nursery) of pure Germanic blood,” with plants of “singular and decisive racial value” (note 1). "Lesser types" were to be pulled out to make space for this expansion of German living space. And all new plants brought in would be carefully screened for their characteristics and purity.

Racial selection meant life and privilege for ethnic Germans, and loss of rights, deportation for many, and in some cases (and for all Jews) death. In Himmler's mind, Mennonites were deemed among the most highly desired of these "seedlings" (see below).

A few of the phrases above are from a speech Himmler gave in Posen on October 24, 1943, a few kilometers away from resettler camps in Warthegau where many from Molotschna would settle five months later. At that time (March 1943) the one-millionth ethnic German from the east was welcomed to Warthegau (note 2).

Notably the morning after Himmler’s speech, thousands of kilometers away the “Great Trek” started up again from the west side of the Dnieper (Alexanderstadt) along the Bug River, which flows south-east from Poland, through Ukraine. The next two months would be harrowing; survivors recall that the “danger was so very near” as they were evacuated “almost under the cannon-fire of the Russians” (note 3); no one knew that they were Himmler’s favoured variety.

Himmler’s speech that week worked with broadly agreed assumptions (not only in Germany; not only in the Nazi era) that there are “racial types,” that the “Nordic race” was a superior type of Herrenmensch—born to rule over so-called lesser races—and that one could speak scientifically of racial health, its improvement or decomposition, e.g., with children of mixed race or hereditary diseases, etc. (note 4).

This was not the first time Mennonites had encountered this. Already before Hitler had seized power, Mennonites fleeing over Moscow 1929-1930 not only had their weight, height and build measured, but also skull shape, eye and hair colour, forehead, eye-brow line, nose (base, width, tip and prominence), ear length and width, and chin shape—all to determine German racial purity (note 5).

This pseudo-science had become truth in Nazi Germany in the 1930s, and the SS racial experts were its priests. In his Posen speech Himmler was confident “that the world must be viewed through this lens of race, and that from this foundation of racial knowledge its problems can be solved.”

Notably the ethnic German “plants” arriving from the USSR via Litzmannstadt were, according to EWZ "racial experts," not of equal value—some needing much more significant “training” and shaping or grafting, like a tree in a nursery, using Himmler’s analogy.

Recently I found files in the German Federal Archives online that included reports by and on the quality of work by these racial experts at Litzmannstadt and an assessment of the quality of their work for the year 1944.

The writer SS-Untersturmführer Godzik was cranky; the war was going badly. It had been a year of upheaval and chaos with the arrival of some 250,000 "Black Sea Germans" refugees—all to be assessed and, if approved (O-cases; note 6), “replanted“ in Warthegau. It was a massive task for the EWZ at Litzmannstadt to receive, delouse, register, assess and resettle. A sister organization was responsible for the removal of Poles too as needed (note 7).

Competing state and Party agencies were confused given the loss of good leaders (Halbstadt’s SS leader Roßner is specifically mentioned), evolving policies, and uncertainty of who does what. The report writer is perturbed about the inconsistent quality of background checks and the incompetency of many involved. All were overworked and as a result far too many individuals of “mixed racial” marriages were added for "planting"—people who were not sufficiently German—and impacting the vision and quality of the garden state.

His assessment of ethnic Germans Lutherans and Catholics from Ukraine is telling. These are compared with the Mennonites—the most highly praised plant for propagation in Warthegau’s garden in his broader experience.

“During my one year of work in Litzmannstadt I had the opportunity to become acquainted with all the ethnic groups from the southern part of Russia [Ukraine] and from Poland, so that, after having worked in the northern and central part myself, I want to be certain to add a brief description of the individual groups to the report. The best that we were able to save from Russia in terms of blood and attitude (Haltung) are the Mennonites, most of whom were resettled in West Prussia and others in Warthegau. The very fact that among them about 90% remained pure (i.e., not mixed with foreign blood) and linguistically almost exclusively German (Plattdeutsch) speaks in their favour. Particularly noteworthy is the unwavering will to live even under the most difficult conditions. This is evidenced well by their very high number of children. Their Old Testament first names and also surnames, such as Isaac, Esau, Benjamin, Sarah, and so on, were exchanged with good German names. Through conversations with their leader (Führer), Prof. Benjamin Unruh, I was able to gain an even deeper impression of this strongly Nordic ethnic group. With about 120 surnames the entire ethnic group is captured (erfaßt), who gave shape to settlements in Zaporozhye, Halbstadt, Melitopol, the Volga Region and partly in the Caucasus as well.

The Protestant ethnic Germans from Eastern Volhynia cannot prove the same abundance of children, have entered into more intermarriages in percentage and are not as racially valuable as the Mennonites. Nevertheless, they represent an asset to the German Reich. Exceptions are the Lutheran villages of … and the two Catholic villages …, which have remained almost pure, but married so closely related that this created significant biological issues. The Swabians from Transnistria are the most valuable among the Lutherans, but they lack in the number of children. They have remained almost untouched by Bolshevization.

The Catholics from the area of Odessa, Dnipropetrovsk, Vosnosensk are descendants of the Swabians and Palatines (Pfälzer), who have a very large proportion of mixed marriages and are racially the most worthless.

The assessment of the Volga Germans is skewed by the fact that almost exclusively the young people of this group appear and are so strongly Bolshevized that one is led to wrong conclusions [in assessment for naturalization]. The majority of them arrive with a Russian girl whom they claim to have married. They need special training and supervision from the Party and the state.” (Note 8)

This Party bureaucrat and the entire bureaucracy welcoming, registering and resettling the Mennonites shared fully the worldview articulated in Himmler’s speech a year earlier.

Using this lens, the report writer's evaluation of Mennonites was similar to Himmler's. When Himmler—a "chief gardener” and architect of the Holocaust—met Mennonite leader Benjamin Unruh secretly over New Years (1942/43), he jokingly greeted Unruh as the “Mennonite Pope.” As Unruh’s children recall him telling the story, Himmler even brought greetings from Unruh’s friends in Molotschna (Himmler visited in October 1942), including the aged and famed Mennonite midwife Frau Berg, who had delivered more than 8,000 ethnic German babies—impressive especially for Himmler (note 9)!

Himmler said to Unruh: "Splendid people, these Mennonites! They are the best! I would naturalize them all without exception even without an ancestral passport!" Unruh replied, "The Mennonites owe this condition to their ecclesiastical discipline (Zucht; can also be translated as breeding!). There has hardly been any intermarriage with the Russians!"

Surprisingly—but maybe not—Unruh, who could always captivate a crowd, proceeded to lecture Himmler on the ancient Frisian ethnic German customs—like not swearing oaths, which Mennonites have preserved! (note 10).

It was a delightful time over two days for both Himmler and the Mennonite “pope” (some accounts say the “Mennonite Moses”). Unruh was proud to have secured some special considerations for his Mennonites from Himmler; it would make them thrive and be attractive for other Mennonites to come to Warthegau from Paraguay, Brazil and maybe Canada (the ones measured and above!) after the war had ended. By mid-year 1944 Unruh's draft constitution (Satzungen) for a new thriving Mennonite church in this racial garden was ready for state and Party approval. And all of this matched Himmler's purposes as well: Mennonites were among the pure and rare “plants” he sought for the colonization of a healthy, vibrant Germanic racial garden, and help fulfill a critical part of his grand and ultimately horrific vision for Europe.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Photo: Children at "Lebensborn," German Reich, understood as a "well-spring" of a future generation of "racially valuable" children (as deemed by SS), https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/lebensborn-program.

Note 1: Audio recording of speech in Posen, Warthegau by Heinrich Himmler: Rede des Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler anlässlich des ‘Tages der Freiheit’ am 24. Oktober 1943 in Posen,” 1:22:36ff.; 1:24:14ff., https://archive.org/details/19431024HeinrichHimmlerUndArthurGreiserRedeAmTagDerFreiheitInPosen92m59s. See also Ostdeutscher Beobachter 5, no. 295 (October 25, 1943), 1, https://www.wbc.poznan.pl/dlibra/publication/125379/edition/134554/content.

Note 2: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/litzmanstadt-odz-entering-reich-1943-44.html.

Note 3: Gerhard Lohrenz, Lose Blätter, Teil III (Winnipeg, MB: Self-published, 1976), 108. On the “Trek,” see previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/last-days-of-mennonite-life-on.html.

Note 4: Himmler, Rede, October 24, 1943: “Nordic” (41:05ff.); “Herrenmensch” (1:08:18). For this entire theme Isabel Heinemann article has been helpful: “Towards an ‘Ethnic reconstruction’ of occupied Europe: SS plans and racial policies,” Annali dell'Istituto storico italo-germanico in Trento, 27 (2001), 498; this entire article has been helpful for my reflections on this theme; https://heyjoe.fbk.eu/index.php/anisig/article/view/2226/2226. On Mennonites as a specially pure “Nordic race,” see previous post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/russian-german-frisians-rebranding.html.

Note 5: Friedrich Keiter, Rußlanddeutsche Bauern und ihre Stammesgenossen in Deutschland. Untersuchungen zur spezielen und allgemeinen Rassenkunde (Jena: Fischer, 1934), 33, https://chortitza.org/Pis/RusBauer.pdf.

Note 6: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/a-cases-and-o-cases-after-trek-1944.html.

Note 7: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/wartheland-mennonite-resettlers-and.html.

Note 8: SS-Untersturmführer Godzik, “Monatsbericht über die Überprüfungsarbeiten im Warthegau, Dezember 1944,” with idem, “Jahresbericht Überprüfungsarbeiten in Litzmannstadt. Beauftragt von der Volksdeutschenmittelstelle bei der EWZ,” in Bundesarchiv R 59/88, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/ff10bcb5-3e63-4e0a-ab33-7988251c7709/. The Report includes: “Betrachtungen über die aus Rußland zurückgeführten Volksgruppen.” On removal of Old Testament names, see previous post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/removal-of-old-testament-names-after.html.

Note 9: Reconstruction of wording by Benjamin H. Unruh’s children, as their father had told the story, 31.12.42 / 01.01.43, Box 2, file 7, 1919-1957, Unruh Collection, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof. On Benjamin Unruh, see my previous post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2022/09/prof-benjamin-unruh-and-mccs.html; also my longer essay, "Benjamin Unruh, MCC and National Socialism," Mennonite Quarterly Review 96, no. 2 (April 2022), 157–205, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1571. On midwife Helene Berg, see previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/motherhood-of-people-halbstadt-midwife.html.

Note 10: On the embrace of Frisian ancestral background, see previous post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/russian-german-frisians-rebranding.html.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Mennonites: Highly Attractive and Desired Seedlings," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), August 20, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/08/mennonites-highly-attractive-and.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Warthegau, Nazism and two 15-year-old Mennonites, 1944

Katharina Esau offered me a home away from home when I was a student in Germany in the 1980s. The Soviet Union released her and her family in 1972. Käthe Heinrichs—her maiden name (b. Aug. 18, 1928)—and my Uncle Walter Bräul were classmates in Gnadenfeld during Nazi occupation of Ukraine, and experienced the Gnadenfeld group “trek” as 15-year-olds together. Before she passed, she wrote her story ( note 1 )—and I had opportunity to interview my uncle. Käthe and Walter both arrived in Warthegau—German annexed Poland—in March 1944 ( note 2 ), and the Reich had a plan for their lives. In February 1944, the Governor of Warthegau ordered the Hitler Youth (HJ) organization to “care for Black Sea German youth” ( note 3 ). Youth were examined for the Hitler Youth, but also for suitability for elite tracks like the one-year Landjahr (farm year and service) program. The highly politicized training of the Landjahr was available for young people in Hitler Youth and its counterpart the League of G...
Post a Comment
Read more

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stalin’s Purge (1937-38) and Mennonite Suffering: 8 theses

1. Millions died under Stalin One of the more recent studies on the Stalin-era estimates that more than 28.7 million people suffered in the northern prisons and slave camps of the Gulag and 2.75 million people died there during Stalin’s reign ( note 1 ). To this number must be added the “close to a million political executions, the millions who died in transit to the Gulag, and some six to seven million who died of starvation during the early 1930s” ( note 2 ). The mass deportation of workers and peasants provided millions of forced labourers in the Arctic and Siberia. George K. Epp calculated that approximately one-third of Mennonites in the Soviet Union—at least 30,000—died due to exposure, beatings, overwork, disease, starvation or shootings ( note 3 ). 2. Mennonites in Ukraine suffered together with their Ukrainian neighbours Moscow was fearful of “losing Ukraine” ( note 4 ) and specifically targeted it with a “lengthy schooling” designed to ruthlessly break the threat of U...
Post a Comment
Read more

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Queen Elizabeth II and Aunt Adina Neufeld Bräul

This month (April 2023) we celebrated my aunt’s 97th birthday—Adina Neufeld Bräul. Queen Elizabeth II and Aunt Adina were born within hours of each other, April 20-21, 1926. She once told me—in somewhat different words—that this makes her wonder about God’s providence … In 1944 in German-annexed Poland, my 16-year-old uncle Walter Bräul was required to report for military service. His first thought: no good soldier should be without a girlfriend! Before leaving for training, he asked one of the girls from "the trek" on a date to see a movie in Exin. Seven years later they would marry in Paraguay. Adina and her mother and sister were on the same trek or group (Gnadenfeld/ Molotschna) out of Ukraine as Walter and my mother (in the 2023 photo). Adina’s most terrible memory of the trek was when their wagon almost tipped over into a deep ravine. She was 17—a year older than Walter—and it was Walter’s 17-year-old brother Peter who literally jumped from his wagon to physically stop ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1923 Mennonite immigrants "kept behind": Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp

An important part of the larger 1923 immigration story includes the chapter of the hundreds who were held back at Riga and Southampton and taken to the Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp for medical care. “Germany generously and magnanimously helped our organizations, on my intercession, to overcome the manifold difficulties connected with such a ( Volksbewegung ) movement of people in such critical times,” Benjamin H. Unruh wrote some years later ( note 1 ). Just as the first group of Russländer Mennonites set foot in Canada 100 years ago this month, the North American relief effort in the USSR was also winding down (August 1923). The famine relief work in 1921 and 1922 had found broad support in the North American Mennonite community. However excitement about a larger immigration of Russian Mennonites to North America was muted, and a new call to action could not forge the same level of cooperation across Mennonite groups. The plan required huge money guarantees. In USSR B.B. Janz h...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Traveler's Impressions of the Molotschna, 1927

In November 1927, Susanna Toews of Ohrloff, Molotschna wrote to her brother Gerhard in Canada, "Father is sleeping and the sisters are reading, even though they have read the stuff ten times. . .. Twice a week we get Das Neue Dorf . We read the most important material the first evening and then father reads the rest of it the next day" ( note 1 ). A youth in Friedensruh, Molotschna reported to the communist youth paper Die Saat in 1928, that their village receives 13 copies of Das Neue Dorf , 6 copies of Die Saat , one of the Moscow-based Deutsche Zentral-Zeitung , 16 copies of Die Trompete, 2 copies of Neuland , and some Russian papers as well. On average, 2 papers per household--all communist papers. A Mennonite-based monthly agricultural journal, “The Practical Agriculturalist” ( Der praktische Landwirt ) had been approved for publication in Ukraine in 1924 but was shut down in December 1926. Government authorities in Ukraine were exasperated to see a “significant a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Shift from Dutch to German, 1700s

Already in 1671, Mennonite Flemish Elder Georg Hansen in Danzig published his German-language catechism ( Glaubens-Bericht für die Jugend ) as preparation for youth seeking baptism. Though educational competencies varied, Hansen’s Glaubens-Bericht assumed that youth preparing for baptism had a stronger ability to read complex German than Dutch ( note 1 ). Popular Mennonite preacher Jacob Denner (1659–1746), originally from the Hamburg-Altona Mennonite Church, lived in Danzig for four years in the early 1700s. A first volume of his Dutch sermons was published in 1706 in Danzig and Amsterdam, and then in 1730 and 1751 he published two German collections. Untrained preachers would often read Denner’s sermons: “Those who preached German—which all Prussian preachers around 1750 did, with the exception of the Danzig preachers—had no sermons books from their co-religionists other than this one by Jacob Denner” ( note 2 ). In Danzig and the Vistula Delta region there were some differences...
Post a Comment
Read more