“Removal of Old Testament Names” after the Trek, 1944

Or: How my Aunt Sara became an “Else”

I remember as a young adult hearing for the first time that my Aunt Sara’s name was officially “Else”. I was stunned to hear that story. No one had ever told us that!

After the “trek” out of Ukraine and upon naturalization as a German citizen in 1944, my 13-year-old Aunt Sara’s name was changed to “Else.” There are many similar examples. Another Mennonite Sara changed her “Jewish-sounding” name to “Agatha;” one Mennonite boy with the name David was given “the sturdy German” name “Albert;” an “Isaak” took the name “Georg;” and an “Abraham” the name “Gerhard” (note 1). Hundreds of Mennonites (minimally) had their “Old Testament names” changed upon naturalization.

With the annexation of western Poland in 1939, Nazi Germany began to remove Poles and Jews and to settle the new territory of Warthegau with "Germans". Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler had said: “I want to create a blond province here” (note 2). In 1943-44 most of the 35,000 Mennonites from Ukraine were settled here as part of the plan to “Germanize” the rural areas. The Central Bureau for Immigration (Einwandererzentralstelle, EWZ) under Himmler with its “racial experts” was responsible for the racial evaluation and naturalization new resettlers.

My grandmother’s EWZ file includes the official form for changing the first name of the applicant, or a child of the applicant. Our family arrived in Warthegau on March 7 and completed their naturalization applications two months later. Changing her daughter Sara's first name is not something my grandmother would have done without some pressure or “coaching.” Her mother’s name was Sara, her sister’s name was Sara, and her daughter too was named Sara.

Recently I located the related document from the Chief of the Security Police and of the Security Service, Central Bureau for Immigration (EWZ):

Directive No. 4/44, “Regarding the Elimination of Old Testament and Communist Given Names in the Registration of Ethnic Germans from Russia,” March 13, 1944 (note 3).

The directive was written a week after the arrival of my grandmother’s family together with thousands more from Molotschna. Their many "undesired" Old Testament names had clearly caused a problem; Mennonites are mentioned twice in the directive.

“In Bible-believing resettler circles, especially among Mennonites, biblical first names are common, such as: Aaron, Abraham, … Benjamin, David, … Isaac, Jonathan, … Samuel. First names like: Elizabeth, … Maria, Michael, … may, however, be considered to have been Germanized, or rather still common for the time being.

It is desirable that these purely … Jewish-sounding first names, which are not to be considered as Germanized, be changed when [the resettlers] are registered by the Immigration Central Office. However, a forced change is to be avoided in consideration of religious feeling, especially among the Mennonites.

The head of the registration office must therefore point out to the head of the family unit that these … Jewish first names are undesirable in Germany and that the change is not only in the general interest, but also in the interest of the resettled person. If the resettler does not have a second first name, the first name of a German grandfather or grandmother is to be used in place of the undesirable first names in order to strengthen the clan consciousness, but the choice of the first name is to be left up to the resettler. It is to be made certain that only good German first names are selected. If the head of the family does not express a wish, the head of the registration office must make an appropriate suggestion.”

First, it is noteworthy that the Nazi regime recognized Mennonites—after years of religious repression under Stalin—not only as "Bible-believing" and as a unique Christian group, but also as one with significant "religious feeling." Even Nazi officials did not want to push too hard, too fast.

Second, it is important to see how names were politicized; there was a sanctioned list of first names for Jews in Nazi Germany as well. In cases where Jews had forenames other than those allowed, as of August 1938 they were required to adopt a second name for passports and identity papers; for women it was “Sarah” and for men “Israel” (note 4).

A list of recommended common German first names was distributed to offices in Warthegau in May as an addendum to the March directive, “so that German given names can be suggested to the resettlers when necessary” (note 5).

This is how my Aunt Sarah became “Else”.

What is the generational impact? No one called my aunt "Else" after the war though that remained her official name. Of my grandmother’s fourteen grandchildren, curiously, all but two of the names appear on the list of "recommended German given names": Arnold, Eduard, Elfrieda, Elvira, Erwin, Gerlinde, Hans, Harold, Helga, Ingrid, Reinhold and Waldemar. But there is no "Sara".

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Cf. EWZ files for Helene Bräul (daughter Sara/Else), A3342-EWZ50-A073, 1946; Sara (Agatha) Penner, A3342-EWZ50-A056, 1282; see Dorothy Siebert, Whatever it takes, 2nd ed. (Winnipeg, MB: Kindred, 2004), 35; cf. Doris L. Bergen, “Mourning, Mass Death and Gray Zone: The Ethnic Germans of Eastern Europe and World War II,” in Symbolic Loss: The Ambiguity of Mourning and Loss at Century’s End, edited by Peter Homans (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2000), 172 (names altered); Abraham (Gerhard) Arendt, A3342-EWZ50-A015, 716.

Note 2: Chef des Rasse- und Siedlungshauptamtes-SS Günther Pancke to Himmler, December 20, 1939, letter, Bundesarchiv NS 2/60, Blatt 4, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/d90b9bc3-f8d2-441d-af46-36a23b3a5d11/; also reported by SS-Sturmbannführer Künzel, December 12, 1939, Blatt 16. In this context Künzel quotes Hitler extensively on racial value from his Mein Kampf (1931, pp. 448f.).

Note 3: SS-Obersturmbannführer von Malsen, "Anordnung Nr. 4/44, Betr.: Beseitigung alttestamentarischer und kommunistischer Vornamen bei der Erfassung der Volksdeutschen aus Rußland (March 13, 1944)," from Bundesarchiv Berlin, R 69/401, pp. 81 to 81b, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/07e0520a-72c1-47bc-9084-966c35d84fa8/.

Note 4: For example, cf., https://www.lbi.org/1938projekt/detail/israel-and-sara/; https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/how-nazis-used-personal-names-to-spawn-the-holocaust-1.5818120.

Note 5: Regierungsrat Hahn, Addendum to “Anordnung Nr. 4/44, Betr.: Beseitigung alttestamentarischer und kommunistischer Vornamen (May 26, 1944)," idem, 82 to 82b.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fas.t, “‘Removal of Old Testament Names’ after the Trek, 1944,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), May 23, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/removal-of-old-testament-names-after.html.

Comments

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons: Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 1 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accuarte and carefully considered. ~ANF American Mennonite leaders who supported Trump will be responding to the election results in the near future. Sometimes a template or sample conference address helps to formulate one’s own text. To that end I offer the following. When Hitler came to power in 1933, Mennonites in Germany sent official greetings by telegram: “The Conference of the East and West Prussian Mennonites meeting today at Tiegenhagen in the Free City of Danzig are deeply grateful for the tremendous uprising ( Erhebung ) that God has given our people ( Volk ) through the vigor and action of [unclear], and promise our cooperation in the construction of our Fatherland, true to the Gospel motto of [our founder Menno Simons], ‘For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.’” ( Note 1 ) Hitler responded in a letter...

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

Anti-Jewish Pogroms and Mennonite responses in Einlage (1905) and Sagradovka (1899)

Below are stories of two pogroms and of the responses in two Mennonite communities in Ukraine/Russia. The first location is Einlage (Chortitza) in 1905, with two episodes. The rage of peasants and the working class exploded with strikes, bloody revolts, chaos and plundering across the land, especially on the estates early in 1905. The Greater Zaporozhzhia-Alexandrovsk economic zone, with larger Mennonite manufacturers of agricultural machinery in Einlage as well, was a centre for some of that labour unrest ( note 1 ). In the shadows of the larger March 1905 Russian Revolution, there were so-called provocateurs named the "Black Hundred" ( note 2 ) who organized pogroms across Russia, but especially in ethnic Ukrainian and Polish areas. “Jewish stores, shops, and homes were broken into, robbed, and plundered; Jewish women and girls were raped and brutally murdered. Many Jews lost not only their belongings in Russia, but also their lives. And all with impunity. The police ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

1873: First Russian Mennonites leave for North America

On February 4, 1873, ministers and elders held a special meeting in Elder Isaak Peters’ Pordenau Molotschna church ( note 1 ). It was a larger building with balcony, constructed in 1860 after the original 1828 stone church building had been torn down. They had put down deep roots in Russia; nonetheless Peters spoke strongly in favour of emigration and supported a decision to send land scouts to America. The team was given a mandate to negotiate for the possibility of some 50 to 60,000 Mennonite immigrants ( note 2 ). Eager to compete with the United States for settlers, the Canadian government passed an Order-in-Council on March 3, 1873 to create a Mennonite reservation of nine-and-one-third townships ( note 3 ). The twelve-member deputation—including two Molotschna elders—which had been sent to North America returned in September with a favourable report ( note 4 ). Despite divergent opinions on the ground, the first hundred Russian Mennonite agriculturalists arrived in the United...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws. It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Why Danzig and Poland?

In the late 16th century, Poland became a haven for a variety of non-conformists which included Jews, Anti-Trinitarians from Italy and Bohemia, Quakers and Calvinists from Great Britain, south German Schwenkfelders, Eastern Orthodox, Armenian, and Greek Catholic Christians, some Muslim Tatars, as well as other peaceful sectarians like the Dutch and Flemish Anabaptists. Unlike the Low Countries and most of western Europe, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was a “state without stakes,” and as such fittingly described as “God’s playground” ( note 1 ). In the view of 17th-century Dutch dramatist Joost van den Vondel, it was “the ‘Promised Land,’ where the refugee could forget all his sorrow and enjoy the richness of the land” ( note 2 ). Over the next two centuries an important strand of Mennonite life and spirituality evolved into a mature tradition in this relatively hospitable context ( note 3 ). Anabaptists from the Low Countries began to arrive in Danzig and region as early as 15...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog