Flemish Anabaptists and Witch Hunts

Political leaders have long used the term "witch hunt"--and there is an historical connection to Mennonites.
Anabaptists and so-called “witches” were arrested and tried for related reasons in the Low Countries in the 1500s: namely, as a means to divert God’s wrath.
The late-Medievals feared that heresy—in this case ana-baptism and the challenge to other sacraments—invited the wrath of God, and was an instrument for the devil’s own hellish apocalyptic assault.
The assumption: the devil's tactics to destroy Christendom included the use of both heretics and sorcerers. Gary Waite writes convincingly that both were seen as “polluting” the community and thus both had to be "excised."

"This fear of pollution, or scandalizing God or the saints, also explains why small numbers of peaceable Mennonites were so harshly treated during the second half of the sixteenth century. Plagues, fires, and economic and social crises were often blamed on the presence of even a small group of individuals believed to be incurring God’s wrath by their very existence within the community." (Note 1)

In Bruges in the 1560s, for example, Friar Cornelis Adriaensz who interrogated many Flemish Anabaptists, accused Herman Vlekwijk of being bewitched (3x), bedeviled (2x), devilish (7x), a devil’s martyr, a devil’s brood, devil possessed, diabolical, hellish (7x), accursed (15x)—not to mention many other things, like being a “great, stupid, awkward ass”! Cornelis warns that whoever drinks “from the venomous breasts of Erasmus” (note 2) to deny young children a church-sanctioned baptism, denies them a protective defense from the devil’s assaults, for in baptism “the devil is exercised by the priest" (note 3).

His use of language was particular vulgar, and could match that of some in the political sphere today.

Inquisitor Cornelis demonstrated a fearful fascination with women and with “that” which “your filthy, sinful wives do with you,” “your filthy, unchaste, carnal wives” (Sorry, it's all in the Martyrs Mirror !). He imagines that Anabaptist men have “maidens” and their “women in common … like dogs,” and on this basis “gain such a great number of adherents” in Bruges. It is at this point in the interrogation of Herman Vlekwijk that Brother Cornelis moves from interrogation to torture: “Bah, you are filthy, carnal, unchaste, voluptuous rogues, that you thus use the women in common, like dogs” (which he repeats), and then says: “Bah, if I cannot prevail upon you with kindness, I must try whether I can do it with severity" (note 4).

In particular, enmity directed at the church’s highest sacraments was deemed to be nothing short of demonic. Anabaptists openly desecrated Bruges’s most treasured and celebrated relic since the high medieval ages. “The Precious Blood of Jesus,” a cloth with the blood of Christ purportedly collected by Joseph of Arimathea was brought to the city after the sacking of Constantinople in the Second Crusade (see note 5; pic 2).

The cloth gave the Bruges basilica its name and glory, and the city God’s favour and protection--as was widely understood in the sixteenth century, just as Bruges's fortunes and shipping access to the sea were beginning to dry-up.

Anabaptist Jacob de Roore (or "Candle Maker"; pic 3) was accused by his Franciscan inquisitor in Bruges with the following (among other things): “Your breaking of bread, and distribution of the cup is the devil’s supper for you … [you] do not bless your cup, nor do you consecrate your bit of bread, but it is wine and bread, and remains wine and bread” (note 6).

“You Anabaptists neither believe nor observe anything of them [i.e., the Holy Councils], except it be very plainly stated in the holy Scriptures. … I could very well show you this from the ancient fathers, but you Anabaptists will rely most firmly on the holy Scriptures alone” (note 7).

In his rage and frustration with the responses by de Roore, the inquisitor declared that he was true victim of torture (witch hunt?):

“You would drive an hundred thousand doctors of divinity mad and crazy”; “see wherewith we are now tormented and vexed”; “I could tear my cap with anger”! (Note 8)

De Roore wrote his congregation from prison: “it will please you to know that I was with the scholars four times, and they would have liked to draw me from my faith. … Three times I was with the provincials of the Augustinians … and once with the preacher of the Gray Brothers [Franciscan], named Brother Cornelis” (note 9; see pic 3).

No doubt Friar Cornelis and other interrogators did their work with pious intention based especially upon their end-time expectations and fear of God's wrath.

And 450 years later ... we still talk about witch hunts, and sometimes Christians (on both sides) anxiously fear the wrath of God if something is not done or eradicated soon.

--Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: See Gary Waite, Eradicating the Devil’s Minions. Anabaptists and Witches in Reformation Europe (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007), 126f.; also 200 and 197. https://books.google.ca/books?id=Y0XbgWXKYAEC&lpg=PP1&dq=Eradicating%20the%20Devil%E2%80%99s%20Minions.%20Anabaptists%20and%20Witches%20in%20Reformation%20Europe.%20Toronto%3A%20University%20of%20Toronto%20Press%2C%202007.&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Note 2: Thieleman Van Braght, Martyrs Mirror: The Story of Fifteen Centuries of Martyrdom (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 2001), 789, 795; 793. https://archive.org/details/TheBloodyTheaterOrMartyrsMirrorOfTheDefenselessChristians/page/n783.

Note 3: Van Braght, Martyrs Mirror, 788.

Note 4: Van Braght, Martyrs Mirror, 796, 797; cf. also 779f.

Note 5: "The Procession of the Holy Blood," Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procession_of_the_Holy_Blood; also "The Basilica of the Holy Blood," https://visit-bruges.be/see/churches/basilica-holy-blood.

Note 6: Van Braght, Martyrs Mirror, 791. With reference to 1 Corinthians 10:21 (“You cannot have a part in both the Lord’s table and the table of demons”), Menno’s 1539 “Foundation of Christian Doctrine” accused the Roman Church of the same, because it “admits all” (including the “avaricious, the proud, the ostentatious …”) and is celebrated with offensive “pomp and splendor” by ministers “who really seek nothing but worldly honor, ease and the belly” (Complete Writings of Menno Simons, edited by J. C. Wenger [Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1984], 142 [also here: https://archive.org/details/completeworksofm00menn/page/n8]; cf. also de Roore in van Braght, Martyrs Mirror, 783). With respect to Menno, in all points of doctrine the Flemish Mennonites were consistent with his “Foundation.”

Note 7: Van Braght, Martyrs Mirror, 789. See also A. L. E. Verheyden, Anabaptism in Flanders, 1530–1650 (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1961), 126, n. 32, https://archive.org/details/anabaptisminflan0000verh.

Note 8: Van Braght, Martyrs Mirror, 795, 789, 797, 794.

Note 9: Translated in Martha J. Reimer-Blok, “The Theological Identity of Flemish Anabaptists: A Study of the Letters of Jacob de Roore,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 62, no. 3 (July 1988), 318–331; 319.

Comments

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2 is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog