1690s Scandal in the Danzig Flemish Church: A Mennonite Artist

A very public congregational dispute between artist Enoch Seemann and Flemish Elder Georg Hansen in Danzig in the 1690s set new limits for Mennonite cultural participation and cemented the central role of the elder.

Renowned Canadian novelist Rudy Wiebe has put the story into a beautiful historical narrative in Sweeter than all the World, based largely on Harry Loewen’s historical tale of Seemann in Cities of Refuge. More recently we have a full text reconstruction of the key lost pamphlet and replies, by Hans Rudolf Lavater. Here is the gist of the story.

Seemann was born in the Hansa city of Elbing (Poland) to a Mennonite minister and artist—a reminder of the sophisticated urban culture that some refugees brought east. Seemann travelled abroad and apprenticed in Holland, then settled in Danzig where he also married. As an accomplished portrait painter, he was disciplined by Elder Hansen and the congregation in 1697 for painting “graven images” and was barred from communion, footwashing, and membership meetings (note 1).

This was an odd case, for Menno Simons too sat for portraits, Seemann argues, and all Mennonites were familiar with the gripping human scenes in the Martyrs Mirror, as well as the elaborate ceiling art in the Red Chamber of Danzig City Hall and paintings in its Treasury created by Flemish Mennonite artist Isaac von den Blocke.

Yet in obedience to the church, Seemann cut up two of his portraits before three congregational representatives and was then accepted back into the congregation. When minister shop-owners however did not destroy their painted signboards, Seemann felt free to return to his art which the congregation saw as deceit. An additional conflict arose when Hansen said the congregation could not permit Seemann to look at human figures, especially “exposed females” which he did “without shame” (note 2).

Hansen’s teaching on the “new creation” or the Christian life sought to warn against the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life—all rooted in the power of sin (note 3). Seemann’s portraits were consistent with the best of seventeenth-century Dutch portraiture painting (Mennonite congregations in Holland were well represented in the “Dutch Golden Age” of painting; note 4). But unlike von den Blocke’s work, Seemann’s art was without an obvious moralistic narrative, e.g., of choosing between the “narrow and broad way” (note 5).

At a second church “brotherhood meeting” Seemann was placed under the ban and no longer referred to as “brother” by church members, but only “friend;” even his wife was not to share table or bed with him. In defiance, Seemann published a “well-intended brotherly admonition and faithful warning made public for all by a lover of the truth” with the title: “The Revelation and Punishment of Georg Hansen’s Folly” (note 6). This is likely the first Mennonite pamphlet (1697) published in Danzig and Poland, and in it Seemann attempted to “admonish” believers and also to expose the Flemish elder’s ignorance and maze of deceit, as well as to shame him into reconsideration. Hansen’s charge of making “graven images” was not only a poor reading of scripture, but superstitious and inconsistent, guided neither by divine nor worldly justice, according to Seemann. He argued that the elder reigned over others by his affects alone, even breaking up marriages—a civil matter—with the ban, which Seemann leveraged to bring before city council (note 7).

Hansen, while a cobbler, was the most theologically literate and eloquent Mennonite apologist in Danzig since Dirk Philips. Hansen judged the art of portraiture painting as “impudent,” “frivolous,” and vain (note 8), but what he really could not tolerate was Seemann’s free-spirited eccentricity as an artist and lack of respect and honour towards the congregation and its leaders.

This very public conflict gives profile to the struggles of the Flemish church in Danzig and Poland with early modernity. Are God-created human beings primarily “individuals” responsible to fulfill their unique spiritual and intellectual potentiality, or called primarily to obey God and to test and live this out in mutual submission to the Christian community? What are the limits to the authority of leaders in a believers’ church? Hansen often spoke of these “last evil times” when “many live as enemies of the cross of Christ, and their destiny is damnation (Philippians 3:17f.; note 9). That so few have not “defiled themselves” (note 10) is sign for the faithful that they are living in “the last days” (note 11). The Seemann case offers a vivid account of the excesses of congregational discipline that had burdened Mennonites now for a century in an attempt to preserve a pure and spotless church.

–Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Cf. the Second Commandment: Exodus 20:4, with Deut. 4: 16-19 and other texts. Cf. Rudy Wiebe, Sweeter than all the World (Toronto: Jackpine House, 2001), 111–136. Harry Loewen, Cities of Refuge: Stories from Anabaptist-Mennonite History and Life (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2010), 79-85. The key document is Rudolf Lavater exhaustive reconstruction of documents and the story: “Der Danziger Maler Enoch I Seemann, die Danziger Mennoniten und die Kunst,” Mennonitica Helvetica 36 (2013): 11–97.

Note 2: Lavater, “Danziger Maler Enoch I Seemann,” 27, 31, 42f., 46, 91f., 111.

Note 3: Cf. summary of Hansen’s Spiegel des Levens in Harvey Plett, “Georg Hansen and the Danzig Flemish Mennonite Church: A Study in Continuity” (PhD dissertation, University of Manitoba, 1991), 318f., https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/xmlui/handle/1993/7218. Hansen’s Confession oder Kurtze und einfältige Glaubens-Bekänetenüsse derer Mennonisten in Preußen, so man nennet die Clarichen (1678; http://pbc.gda.pl/dlibra/docmetadata?from=rss&id=35959) and appended examination is in line with Peter Twisck’s confession (in von Braght, Martyrs Mirror, 373–410); Twisck speaks of humanity after the fall as “corrupted” and “inclined to sin,” but affirms freedom of the will by God’s grace after the Fall. This larger message is arguably present in von Blocke’s works in Danzig City Hall; cf. Rainer Kobe, “Isaac von den Blocke, Painter and Mennonite at Gdańsk,” in European Mennonites and the Challenge of Modernity over Five Centuries. Contributors, Detractors, and Adaptors, edited by Mark Jantzen et al. (North Newton, KS: Bethel College, 2016).

Note 4: Cf. for example Robert W. Regier, “The Anabaptists and Art: The Dutch Golden Age of Painting,” Mennonite Life 23, no. 1 (January 1968) 16–21, https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1968jan.pdf; Hendrick Meihuizen, “Dutch Painters in the Time of Vondel and Rembrandt,” in A Legacy of Faith: The Heritage of Menno Simons, edited by Cornelius J. Dyck, 119–135 (Newton, KS: Faith and Life, 1962), https://archive.org/details/legacyoffaithher00unse. See “The Dutch Golden Age: Mennonite to the Core” by Lauren Friesen, lecture at Kauffman Museum at Bethel College, October 2021, https://youtu.be/a38xkoTYZng.

Note 5: The name of von Blocke’s painting in the Protestant St. Catherine Church in Danzig.

Note 6: Lavater, “Danziger Maler Enoch I Seemann,” esp. 80, 89, 91, 92, 93.

Note 7: Lavater, “Danziger Maler Enoch I Seemann,” 43, 45, 94. For a contemporary English perspective on life in Danzig—including its forms of civil punishment, feasting, food, entertainment, recreation and church life—cf. Travels, Travels of Peter Mundy, vol. 4: Travels in Europe, 1639–1647, edited by Richard C. Temple (London: Hakluyt Society, 1925), 167–193, https://archive.org/details/travelspetermun00mundgoog/page/n8/mode/2up.

Note 8: Lavater, “Danziger Maler Enoch I Seemann,” 32, 37, 71, 145. Hansen uses Luther’s translation of Acts 19:19, in which those who practiced “fürwitzige” (frivolous) arts brought their scrolls to be publicly burnt. The Greek original refers to magical arts, as found in most translations.

Note 9: Hansen, Glaubens-Bericht, 73.

Note 10: Hansen, Glaubens-Bericht, 74.

Note 11: Hansen, Glaubens-Bericht, 78.

Comments

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

A Mennonite Pandemic Spirituality, 1830-1831

Asiatic Cholera broke out across Russia in 1829 and ‘30, and further into Europe in 1831. It began with an infected battalion in Orenburg ( note 1 ), and by early Fall 1830 the disease had reached Moscow and the capital. Russia imposed drastic quarantine measures. Much like today, infected regions were cut off and domestic trade was restricted. The disease reached the Molotschna River district in Fall 1830, and by mid-December hundreds of Nogai deaths were recorded in the villages adjacent to the Mennonite colony, leading state authorities to impose a strict quarantine. When the Mennonite Johann Cornies—a state-appointed agricultural supervisor and civic leader—first became aware of the nearby cholera-related deaths, he recommended to the Mennonite District Office on December 6, 1830 to stop traffic and prevent random contacts with Nogai. For Cornies it was important that the Mennonite community do all it can keep from carrying the disease into the community, though “only God knows...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia: “We cordially plead ...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...

Penmanship: School Exercise Samples, 1869 and 1883

Johann Cornies recommended “penmanship as the pedagogical means for [developing] a sense of beauty” ( note 1 ). Schönschreiben --calligraphy or penmanship--appears in the handwritten school plans and manuals of Tobias Voth (Ohrloff, 1820), Jakob Bräul (Rudnerweide, 1830), and Heinrich Heese (Ohrloff, 1842). Heese had a list of related supplies required for each pupil, including “a Bible, slate, slate pencil, paper, straight edge, lead pencil, quill pen, quill knife, ink bottle, three candlesticks, three snuffers, and a container to keep supplies; the teacher will provide water color ( Tusche ) and ink” ( note 2 ). The standard school schedule at this time included ten subject areas: Bible; reading; writing; recitation and composition; arithmetic; geography; singing; recitation and memory work; and preparation of the scripture for the following Sunday worship—and penmanship ( note 3 ). Below are penmanship samples first from the Molotschna village school of Tiege, 1869. This student...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog