1690s Scandal in the Danzig Flemish Church: A Mennonite Artist

A very public congregational dispute between artist Enoch Seemann and Flemish Elder Georg Hansen in Danzig in the 1690s set new limits for Mennonite cultural participation and cemented the central role of the elder.

Renowned Canadian novelist Rudy Wiebe has put the story into a beautiful historical narrative in Sweeter than all the World, based largely on Harry Loewen’s historical tale of Seemann in Cities of Refuge. More recently we have a full text reconstruction of the key lost pamphlet and replies, by Hans Rudolf Lavater. Here is the gist of the story.

Seemann was born in the Hansa city of Elbing (Poland) to a Mennonite minister and artist—a reminder of the sophisticated urban culture that some refugees brought east. Seemann travelled abroad and apprenticed in Holland, then settled in Danzig where he also married. As an accomplished portrait painter, he was disciplined by Elder Hansen and the congregation in 1697 for painting “graven images” and was barred from communion, footwashing, and membership meetings (note 1).

This was an odd case, for Menno Simons too sat for portraits, Seemann argues, and all Mennonites were familiar with the gripping human scenes in the Martyrs Mirror, as well as the elaborate ceiling art in the Red Chamber of Danzig City Hall and paintings in its Treasury created by Flemish Mennonite artist Isaac von den Blocke.

Yet in obedience to the church, Seemann cut up two of his portraits before three congregational representatives and was then accepted back into the congregation. When minister shop-owners however did not destroy their painted signboards, Seemann felt free to return to his art which the congregation saw as deceit. An additional conflict arose when Hansen said the congregation could not permit Seemann to look at human figures, especially “exposed females” which he did “without shame” (note 2).

Hansen’s teaching on the “new creation” or the Christian life sought to warn against the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life—all rooted in the power of sin (note 3). Seemann’s portraits were consistent with the best of seventeenth-century Dutch portraiture painting (Mennonite congregations in Holland were well represented in the “Dutch Golden Age” of painting; note 4). But unlike von den Blocke’s work, Seemann’s art was without an obvious moralistic narrative, e.g., of choosing between the “narrow and broad way” (note 5).

At a second church “brotherhood meeting” Seemann was placed under the ban and no longer referred to as “brother” by church members, but only “friend;” even his wife was not to share table or bed with him. In defiance, Seemann published a “well-intended brotherly admonition and faithful warning made public for all by a lover of the truth” with the title: “The Revelation and Punishment of Georg Hansen’s Folly” (note 6). This is likely the first Mennonite pamphlet (1697) published in Danzig and Poland, and in it Seemann attempted to “admonish” believers and also to expose the Flemish elder’s ignorance and maze of deceit, as well as to shame him into reconsideration. Hansen’s charge of making “graven images” was not only a poor reading of scripture, but superstitious and inconsistent, guided neither by divine nor worldly justice, according to Seemann. He argued that the elder reigned over others by his affects alone, even breaking up marriages—a civil matter—with the ban, which Seemann leveraged to bring before city council (note 7).

Hansen, while a cobbler, was the most theologically literate and eloquent Mennonite apologist in Danzig since Dirk Philips. Hansen judged the art of portraiture painting as “impudent,” “frivolous,” and vain (note 8), but what he really could not tolerate was Seemann’s free-spirited eccentricity as an artist and lack of respect and honour towards the congregation and its leaders.

This very public conflict gives profile to the struggles of the Flemish church in Danzig and Poland with early modernity. Are God-created human beings primarily “individuals” responsible to fulfill their unique spiritual and intellectual potentiality, or called primarily to obey God and to test and live this out in mutual submission to the Christian community? What are the limits to the authority of leaders in a believers’ church? Hansen often spoke of these “last evil times” when “many live as enemies of the cross of Christ, and their destiny is damnation (Philippians 3:17f.; note 9). That so few have not “defiled themselves” (note 10) is sign for the faithful that they are living in “the last days” (note 11). The Seemann case offers a vivid account of the excesses of congregational discipline that had burdened Mennonites now for a century in an attempt to preserve a pure and spotless church.

–Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Cf. the Second Commandment: Exodus 20:4, with Deut. 4: 16-19 and other texts. Cf. Rudy Wiebe, Sweeter than all the World (Toronto: Jackpine House, 2001), 111–136. Harry Loewen, Cities of Refuge: Stories from Anabaptist-Mennonite History and Life (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2010), 79-85. The key document is Rudolf Lavater exhaustive reconstruction of documents and the story: “Der Danziger Maler Enoch I Seemann, die Danziger Mennoniten und die Kunst,” Mennonitica Helvetica 36 (2013): 11–97.

Note 2: Lavater, “Danziger Maler Enoch I Seemann,” 27, 31, 42f., 46, 91f., 111.

Note 3: Cf. summary of Hansen’s Spiegel des Levens in Harvey Plett, “Georg Hansen and the Danzig Flemish Mennonite Church: A Study in Continuity” (PhD dissertation, University of Manitoba, 1991), 318f., https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/xmlui/handle/1993/7218. Hansen’s Confession oder Kurtze und einfältige Glaubens-Bekänetenüsse derer Mennonisten in Preußen, so man nennet die Clarichen (1678; http://pbc.gda.pl/dlibra/docmetadata?from=rss&id=35959) and appended examination is in line with Peter Twisck’s confession (in von Braght, Martyrs Mirror, 373–410); Twisck speaks of humanity after the fall as “corrupted” and “inclined to sin,” but affirms freedom of the will by God’s grace after the Fall. This larger message is arguably present in von Blocke’s works in Danzig City Hall; cf. Rainer Kobe, “Isaac von den Blocke, Painter and Mennonite at Gdańsk,” in European Mennonites and the Challenge of Modernity over Five Centuries. Contributors, Detractors, and Adaptors, edited by Mark Jantzen et al. (North Newton, KS: Bethel College, 2016).

Note 4: Cf. for example Robert W. Regier, “The Anabaptists and Art: The Dutch Golden Age of Painting,” Mennonite Life 23, no. 1 (January 1968) 16–21, https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1968jan.pdf; Hendrick Meihuizen, “Dutch Painters in the Time of Vondel and Rembrandt,” in A Legacy of Faith: The Heritage of Menno Simons, edited by Cornelius J. Dyck, 119–135 (Newton, KS: Faith and Life, 1962), https://archive.org/details/legacyoffaithher00unse. See “The Dutch Golden Age: Mennonite to the Core” by Lauren Friesen, lecture at Kauffman Museum at Bethel College, October 2021, https://youtu.be/a38xkoTYZng.

Note 5: The name of von Blocke’s painting in the Protestant St. Catherine Church in Danzig.

Note 6: Lavater, “Danziger Maler Enoch I Seemann,” esp. 80, 89, 91, 92, 93.

Note 7: Lavater, “Danziger Maler Enoch I Seemann,” 43, 45, 94. For a contemporary English perspective on life in Danzig—including its forms of civil punishment, feasting, food, entertainment, recreation and church life—cf. Travels, Travels of Peter Mundy, vol. 4: Travels in Europe, 1639–1647, edited by Richard C. Temple (London: Hakluyt Society, 1925), 167–193, https://archive.org/details/travelspetermun00mundgoog/page/n8/mode/2up.

Note 8: Lavater, “Danziger Maler Enoch I Seemann,” 32, 37, 71, 145. Hansen uses Luther’s translation of Acts 19:19, in which those who practiced “fürwitzige” (frivolous) arts brought their scrolls to be publicly burnt. The Greek original refers to magical arts, as found in most translations.

Note 9: Hansen, Glaubens-Bericht, 73.

Note 10: Hansen, Glaubens-Bericht, 74.

Note 11: Hansen, Glaubens-Bericht, 78.

Comments

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons: Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws. It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...

1921: Formation of the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine”

Famine was imminent; unprecedented drought; taxes and requisitions exceeded what was harvested; some villages had no horses; extortion and arrests were widespread; many men were disenfranchised and barred from village affairs (see note 1 ). Lenin responded with the 1921 “New Economic Policy” (NEP), which allowed for a degree of market flexibility within the context of socialism to ward off complete economic collapse. A fixed-tax was imposed, grain quotas were eased, farmers were allowed a small amount of land and could sell excess produce at free-market prices after taxes had been paid. Much was in the air. In secret talks, Soviet Trade Commissar Leonid Krasin told the head of the Eastern Section in the German Foreign Office, Gustav Behrendt, that the USSR was “prepared—just like Catherine the Great of old—to call hundreds of thousands of German colonists into the land and transfer them to large, closed complexes for settlement,” especially in Turkestan and the North Caucasus, be...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...

Molotschna Elder Heinrich Dirks and tensions with Mennonite Brethren

Russian Mennonites were not always kind to each other—and nowhere is this seen better than in the tensions between “old” Mennonites and the “separatist” Mennonite Brethren, who had their beginnings in Gnadenfeld, Molotschna in 1860. Heinrich Dirks (1842-1915) was the first Russian Mennonite overseas missionary and later long-time Gnadenfeld, Molotschna ( note 1 ). Everything about Dirks’ life suggests that he would have joined the Brethren in 1860. He too was influenced by the "powerful and gripping” conversionist ministry of Eduard Wüst in his youth. Dirks was a young adult in the Gnadenfeld congregation in South Russia where the Mennonite Brethren /separatist movement began. Shortly thereafter, he was trained in the German pietist Barmen Mission School (1863-67), and famously travelled to Sumatra (Indonesia) where he started a mission outpost and school. The Mennonite Brethren too would later connect the global mission imperative with the impending return of Christ as did Dirk...

When Mennonite Agencies withdraw support from star player: Benjamin Unruh, 1938

In 1938 Mennonite Central Committee took the decision to significantly reduce their support of Benjamin Unruh’s work in Germany as of August 1, and Dutch Mennonites announced the same effective January 1, 1939. What to do? Ask the Nazi Party and government agencies to make up the difference ( note 1 )! On December 3, 1938, Unruh made the following pitch: “Germany generously and magnanimously helped our [Mennonite] organizations, on my intercession, to overcome the manifold difficulties connected with such a large movement of people [beginning 1923] in such critical times. ... The fact that finally all Mennonite synodal and national associations formally appointed me as their representative in the field of Russian-German welfare (Fürsorge), had its deeper reason especially in the success of my activity in Germany. … You see that I stand in the center of the global Mennonite [relief] work. However, I have always done this as a German man and not only as a representative of my denominat...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog