"The future of the Mennonite Church is not in Prussia but in Russia."

The 1788-89 start for Mennonites in New Russia was disastrous, and after four years colonists begged for ministerial leaders from Prussia to come and establish order (note 1).

On Good Friday, April 18, 1794, a Flemish church elder and a minister--Cornelius Regier of Heubuden and Cornelius Warkentin of Rosenort-- arrived in Chortitza to assist. After only three weeks of moderating, reconciling, teaching, ordaining and baptizing, Regier contracted an illness and died; Warkentin finished their work and returned to Prussia on July 10.

Warkentin’s Prussian ministerial colleagues were skeptical. Would order last in that rag-tag group? But Warkentin returned with the conviction “that the future of the Mennonite Church was not in Prussia but in Russia” (note 2). Why?

During his visit to Chortitza, Warkentin met Russian State Counsellor Samuel Contenius—the son of a German Westphalian Protestant pastor—responsible for the oversight and care of foreign colonists. Warkentin was convinced of the counsellor’s deep commitment to the Mennonite settlement (note 3).

And importantly, Warkentin was struck by the empire’s ecumenical peace, respect and protection—quite foreign to Prussia!—for minority religious groups like the Mennonites. On his return, Warkentin had inter-church encounters in New Russia that helped to strengthen that conviction (note 4).

First, around Vyshenka he stopped and met with German Lutheran, Catholic, and Hutterite leaders. The Lutheran pastor offered coffee, long conversation and a polite farewell. The Catholic priest extended similar hospitality to him, and “as we parted we were both convinced that we would meet again in that place of eternal bliss.” While in the middle of their harvest, the Hutterites too gave Warkentin a “warm welcome,” invited him to preach twice and were “deeply moved” by his reflections on conversion, new birth and Christian service. This was complemented by a friendly invitation for a tour of the Tsarina’s summer palace and conversation with the Orthodox countess in Vyshenka.

Then another German group immigrating to Russia but held up in Riga “made me preach to them in a large room in their hotel where people from various religious backgrounds attended. They all expressed their satisfaction to me, and a rich merchant invited me to have dinner with his family in his garden.” Additional lengthy conversations “on many topics” over coffee and meals were held with the mayor and the governor of Riga and the latter’s guests “of very high rank.” Finally, two evangelical pastors saw Warkentin off at the harbour in Riga. This was not Prussia: the unique climate of hospitable ecumenism and official support solidified Warkentin’s vision for a thriving Mennonite future in the Russian empire.

For the next twenty-five years, Warkentin actively negotiated “with a great deal of circumspection” (note 5) with Contenius and other Russian officials to promote emigration, especially as land restrictions tightened for Mennonites in Prussia under Friedrich Wilhelm III in 1801.

On August 22, 1802, Contenius wrote Warkentin regarding the request for some two hundred families of Mennonite faith to settle in the region. He indicated that Governor Count von Miklashevsky was prepared to welcome not only two hundred, but several thousand Mennonite families, and that he would set aside the best available land for them. Moreover, they would receive the same privileges and better crown loans than those Mennonites who had immigrated earlier, and be given even more generous terms than any other settler group.

“[I]f necessary, a half million Morgen [125,000 hectares] of land will be divided and held in readiness for them,” Contenius wrote encouragingly. “In order to take advantage of the generous terms offered by the state we must move as quickly as possible.” Contenius added that Warkentin should understand that the contents of the letter “must be guarded with caution and not broadcast too widely. I do not wish to promote misunderstandings or anger elsewhere by appearing to entice strangers into leaving their fatherland” (note 6).

In the next year, as thousands prepared for emigration with detailed recommendations for would-be settlers sent by Contenius, Warkentin’s highly secret Russian correspondence was in fact confiscated and, in turn, he was silenced. Warkentin responded to Russian officials that “the Prussian government continues threatening those who want to leave. It has promised to confiscate half of all property and possessions of every emigrant” (note 7).

Historically Russia’s religious policies and accommodations for non-Orthodox minority groups had proven to be more successful in minimizing religious violence than in the west—which Warkentin understood.

Because of his ongoing efforts and accomplishments, Alexander I recognized Warkentin in 1804 with a solid gold medal with the inscription: “To Warkentin, the Elder of the Mennonites” (note 8 ).

Moreover, a half century later Mennonites confessed that “Contenius, was the man whom God gave us at this time, so that we would be led towards our destiny in the new Fatherland. Imbued with a Christian love of humanity, he dealt with matters of the community with rare faithfulness and great circumspection. No branch of business that could become important went unnoticed by him” (note 9).

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Photo (close up of coin) https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/numbered-photos/pholist2.php?num=2004-0215.

Note 1: Cf. related post.

Note 2: Cf. Johannes van der Smissen, The History of the Church in Chortitza. Towards an Understanding of the History of the Church in the Mennonite Colonies in South Russia (1856), translated and edited by William Schroeder (Winnipeg, MB: Schroeder, 1992), 28. Also published in Preservings no. 15 (1999): 3–10, https://www.plettfoundation.org/files/preservings/Preservings15.pdf.

Note 3: David G. Rempel, “The Mennonite Migration to New Russia (1787–1870): II. The Emigration to Russia,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 9, no. 3 (July 1935), 120. On Contenius, see E. Schmid-München, Die deutschen Bauern in Südrußland (Berlin: Deutsche Landbuchhandlung, 1917), 15, https://chortitza.org/0v937.pdf.

Note 4: Cf. van der Smissen, History of the Church in Chortitza, 23–28; Peter M. Friesen, The Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia, 1789–1910 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978), 163-165, https://archive.org/details/TheMennoniteBrotherhoodInRussia17891910/.

Note 5: Rempel, “Mennonite Migration to New Russia (II),” 120.

Note 6: Samuel Contenuis to Cornelius Warkentin, Rosenort, West Prussia, August 22, 1802, Letter, California Mennonite Historical Society Bulletin 35 (January 1998), 7–10. https://fpuscholarworks.fresno.edu/bitstream/handle/11418/335/cmhs035-7.pdf. On problems finding land suitable to meet the state mandate (model farming) for new settlers, cf. David G. Rempel, “The Mennonite Migration to New Russia (1787–1870): I. The Colonization Policy of Catherine II and Alexander I,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 9, no. 2 (April 1935), 88f.

Note 7: C. Warkentin, correspondence cited in Andrey Ivanov, “Emigration to New Russia: Complications and Challenges,” California Mennonite Historical Society Bulletin 37 (December 1999), 7f., https://fpuscholarworks.fresno.edu/handle/11418/350.

Note 8: Van der Smissen, History of the Church in Chortitza, 28.

Note 9: Johann Peters, “Eine einfache Erzählung der Auswanderung der Chortitzer Mennoniten,” 1857 (from Chortitza: Mennonitische Geschichte und Ahnenforschung, https://chortitza.org/pdf/0v751.php).

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "The Future of the Mennonite Church is not in Prussia but in Russia," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), September 16, 2022, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-future-of-mennonite-church-is-not.html.

Comments

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2 is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...

Ideas for Educational Reform, 1832

After four decades in Russia, the president of the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Colonists, Andrei Fadeev, considered only eight of 116 Mennonite teachers in the two larger regions of Katerynoslav and Tauria—which included the Molotschna—fit to teach ( note 1 ). Jakob Bräul’s Rudnerweide schoolhouse was given the same status as Heinrich Heese’s Ohrloff Agricultural Society School with regard to policies and “especially for the teaching of Russian” ( note 2 ). Fadeev triggered great angst when by “imperial decree” he distributed a book to church elders written by German Mennonite Abraham Hunzinger on the modernization of Mennonite schools and church. It was a friendly gesture and poke. The Molotschna was already a tinderbox, and this spark introduced by a state official to strengthen the community ignited a fire in the colony. Fadeev wrote to Johann Cornies on January 12, 1832: “Most valued Cornies ... I advise you to acquire and read a booklet sent to your church leaders f...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Life in Exin, 1944: German-Occupied Poland

After the 1943-44 portion of the Great Trek ended with settlement of some 35,000 Mennonites in German-annexed Poland, the Gnadenfeld area trek members were scattered in resettler camps ( Umsiedler-Lager ) around Exin ( Kcynia ) and the Altburgund District administrative centre of Dietfurt ( Żnin ), including the hamlets of Kiefernrode ( Słupowiec ), Schwarzerde ( Malice ), Schmiedebach, etc. ( note 1) . Until World War I, the area was part of the German-Prussian Province of Posen, about 170 kilometres south-west of Danzig ( Gdańsk ) and about 400 kilometres east of Berlin. Almost all ethnic German resettlers from Ukraine arrived through Litzmannstadt (Łódź), one of two entrance points from the east into new German province of “Warthegau” ( note 2) . Here thousands were cleansed, deloused and processed daily. Some Gnadenfeld group members were brought to Janowitz (Janowiec) , near Hermannsbad in the District of Hohensalza for quarantine. Here fresh straw was laid out on the floor for ...

Russo-Japanese War and the Mennonite Response, 1904-05

In February 1904, Russia declared war on Japan and Mennonite congregations sent the Tsar messages of loyalty, love and prayers. The large Lichtenau-Petershagen-Schönsee congregation in the Mennonite Molotschna Colony in today’s Ukraine led by 80-year-old Elder (Bishop) Jakob Töws expressed its “deep loyalty and love for the throne and the Fatherland” ( note 1 ). Similarly, the Mennonite Chortitza congregation declared that Mennonites bow “humbly before the Imperial Majesty with most faithful love and devotion,” and “together with all faithful subjects send their most passionate prayers and supplications to the Most High, that He may extend his mighty hand over the beloved Tsar and the Russian people, and that peace may soon be returned” ( note 2 ). The Einlage Mennonite Brethren congregation offered a similar statement, “inspired by feelings of boundless dedication to the Sovereign Fatherland,” with “passionate prayers” for the Tsar and Fatherland, based on 1 Timothy 2:1–4 ( note 3 ...

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß"; note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...

When Singing becomes Urgent: Survival and Salvation through Music

Singing: survival and salvation 1) Language change, 1767, Danzig : Flemish Elder Hans van Steen published A Spiritual Hymnal for General Edification, designed also for private and family settings to “awaken devotion and edification,” and in particular for the youth—that they may “not use it out of mere habit, but rather for the true uplifting of the heart” ( note 1 ). 2) Revivalism, 1850s . The influence of Eduard Wüst--revivalist minister installed by nearby separatist Evangelical Brethren--on the Mennonites was “boundless,” according to State Councillor E. H. Busch. “Satan is not entitled to present his own as the most joyful.” His people “sing, jump, leap ( hüpfen ) and dance,” while the Christian appears “cheerless and stooped over. … Why, when one opens a song book, are hymns about the cross and affliction chosen almost instinctively instead of songs of praise and thanksgiving? Isn’t the devil also having his fun in all of this?” Mennonite Brethren historian P.M. Friesen called ...

Why Danzig and Poland?

In the late 16th century, Poland became a haven for a variety of non-conformists which included Jews, Anti-Trinitarians from Italy and Bohemia, Quakers and Calvinists from Great Britain, south German Schwenkfelders, Eastern Orthodox, Armenian, and Greek Catholic Christians, some Muslim Tatars, as well as other peaceful sectarians like the Dutch and Flemish Anabaptists. Unlike the Low Countries and most of western Europe, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was a “state without stakes,” and as such fittingly described as “God’s playground” ( note 1 ). In the view of 17th-century Dutch dramatist Joost van den Vondel, it was “the ‘Promised Land,’ where the refugee could forget all his sorrow and enjoy the richness of the land” ( note 2 ). Over the next two centuries an important strand of Mennonite life and spirituality evolved into a mature tradition in this relatively hospitable context ( note 3 ). Anabaptists from the Low Countries began to arrive in Danzig and region as early as 15...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog