Skip to main content

The Shift from Dutch to German, 1700s

Already in 1671, Mennonite Flemish Elder Georg Hansen in Danzig published his German-language catechism (Glaubens-Bericht für die Jugend) as preparation for youth seeking baptism. Though educational competencies varied, Hansen’s Glaubens-Bericht assumed that youth preparing for baptism had a stronger ability to read complex German than Dutch (note 1).

Popular Mennonite preacher Jacob Denner (1659–1746), originally from the Hamburg-Altona Mennonite Church, lived in Danzig for four years in the early 1700s. A first volume of his Dutch sermons was published in 1706 in Danzig and Amsterdam, and then in 1730 and 1751 he published two German collections. Untrained preachers would often read Denner’s sermons: “Those who preached German—which all Prussian preachers around 1750 did, with the exception of the Danzig preachers—had no sermons books from their co-religionists other than this one by Jacob Denner” (note 2).

In Danzig and the Vistula Delta region there were some differences between the Frisian and Flemish Mennonite groups.

From the earliest years, the predominant language among the smaller Frisian Mennonite group had been more German than Dutch, whereas the larger Flemish Mennonite population used Dutch exclusively. As early as 1671, a letter written to the Het Lam congregation in Amsterdam by five Frisian Danzig preachers—they were accused of having many “drinkers” in their congregation—was written in High German. Five other letters from Frisian congregations in the Greater Delta in the same decade were also written in High German (note 3). A century later in 1782, the Frisian Danzig minister and translator of selections from Martyrs Mirror lamented the dearth of Anabaptist materials available in “our High German language” (note 4).

Early in the 1700s Flemish ministers in the Greater Delta preached “largely in Dutch or in Low German” (note 5). The change in the pulpit language to High German was complete by mid-century--except in Danzig. Longtime Elder Hans van Steen (d. 1780) "had an excellent command of the Dutch language both in speaking and in writing and resisted the transition from Dutch preaching to German" (note 6).

A Danzig Flemish family Bible contains records written in 1734 mostly in Dutch mixed with some German; entries by the same writer six years later are written in High German. Yet as late as 1752 Flemish Mennonites ordered 3,000 Dutch hymnals from Amsterdam (note 7).

In the Danzig Flemish Mennonite Church, visiting Elbing-Ellerwalde Elder Gerhard Wiebe was the first to preach a German sermon, September 19, 1762; apparently Wiebe’s sermon was not well received. When Heubuden’s Flemish elder Cornelius Regier preached in German in Danzig on April 20, 1767, he “found greater approval” (note 8). 

The Polish Prussian rural churches with the leadership of Gerhard Wiebe produced a first German hymnal in 1767. The shift in language was inevitable after the First Partition of Poland under new Prussian rule; one diary notes: "30 March 1777. On the first holiday of Easter the Dutch hymnals are set aside in Ladekop and High German is adopted for signing hymns" (note 9). In his first preface to the German hymnal, Wiebe wrote: 

"Most of our co-religionists had grown up with Dutch. However because we use High German in preaching and singing, as well as when instructing the youth here in our Mennonite congregations (Taufgesinnten Gemeinen) here in W. Prussia, we made the decision (with Divine assistance) to publish this hymnal, in the certain hope that it will serve for general edification, and that God-seeking souls will derive no small benefit from it." (Note 10).

Cultural change was inevitable for the congregation in Danzig as well. While van Steen's preference for worship was Dutch, he was ultimately responsible for Danzig's first German hymnal in 1780. The collection was significantly different than that used in the rural Prussian congregations. However both were designed not only for use in public worship, but also for private and family settings to “awaken devotion and edification,” and in particular for the youth—that they may “not use it out of mere habit, but rather for the true uplifting of the heart,” as van Steen wrote in his preface (note 11).

The next year a Mennonite confession of faith written in Dutch in 1730 was translated into German and published for use in Heubuden (1768; note 12).

The first German sermon to be preached in Danzig by one of its own ministers, however, did not take place until January 1, 1771 (note 13).

When did Mennonites in Polish-Prussia and Danzig begin to use a German Bible? I am not aware of any source that mentions a switch of Bibles, but I would assume a German sermon was accompanied by scripture reading in German.

Mennonite migration to New Russia began in 1788.

Resources for faith formation in New Russia were limited from the start. In 1806, ministers in the Molotschna and Chortitza colonies begged (in German) the mother congregations in Prussia to send more German Bibles, catechisms, and hymnals—but Dutch texts would also do, “for we can still read Dutch without difficulty" (note 14).

In his Mennonite Encyclopedia article on the German language West Prussian Mennonite Geistreiches Gesangbuch, Cornelius Krahn wrote in 1955 that the hymnal had  "the unusual record of having been in use for nearly 200 years ... going through 11 editions in Prussia, 7 in Russia, 11 in America, and 2 in Mexico, a total of 33 editions ranging from 3,000 to 5,000 copies each, making it the most widely used hymnbook of the Prussian-Russian Mennonites” (note 15).

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Map: Horst Penner, Ansiedlung mennonitischer Niederländer im Weichselmündungsgebiet von der Mitte des 16. Jh. bis zum Beginn der Preußischen Zeit (Weierhof: Mennonitischer Geschichtsverein, 1940), 145, http://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=33883.

Note 1: Georg Hansen, Ein Glaubens-Bericht für die Jugend durch einen Liebhaber der Wahrheit gestellt und ans Licht gebracht im Jahre Christi 1671 (Elkhart, IN: Mennonite Publishing, 1892). Also idem, Confession oder Kurtze und einfältige Glaubens-Bekänetenüsse derer Mennonisten in Preußen, so man nennet die Clarichen (N.p. 1678), https://dhb.thulb.uni-jena.de/receive/ufb_cbu_00010148. 

Note 2: Cf. Jacob Denner's Christlich- und Erbauliche Betrachtungen über die Sonn- und Festtags-Evangelia des ganzen Jahrs, neue Auflage (Königsberg, [1730] 1751), https://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/id/PPN819172022; also Hermann G. Mannhardt, “Geschichte der Predigt in den deutschen Mennoniten-Gemeinden (Fortsetzung),” Mennonitische Blätter 38, no. 5 (March 1, 1891), 28–29, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1854-1900/1891/DSCF1343.JPG.

Note 3: Horst Penner, Die ost- und westpreußischen Mennoniten in ihrem religiösen und sozialen Leben in ihren kulturellen und wirtschaftlichen Leistungen, Teil 1, 1526–1772, 2nd edition (Weierhof: Mennonitischer Geschichtsverein, 1994), 178f. English draft: https://www.mharchives.ca/download/3408/.

Note 4: Isaak van Dühren, Geschichte der Märtyrer, oder kurze historische Nachricht von den Verfolgungen der Mennonisten (Königsberg: Hartung, 1782/1788), 3; 34, https://gdz.sub.unigoettingen.de/id/PPN660141337.

Note 5: Abraham Hartwich, Geographisch-Historische Landes-Beschribung [sic] derer dreyen im Pohlnischen Preußen liegenden Werdern (Königsberg, 1723), 290, http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/resolve/display/bsb10000874.html.

Note 6: Jacob A. Duerksen, "Transition from Dutch to German in West Prussia," Mennonite Life 22, no. 3 (July 1967), 109, https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1967jul.pdf. 

Note 7: Hans van Steen, “Ein Danziger Brief an Martin Möllinger” (November 30, 1769), reprinted in Christlicher Gemeinde-Kalender 5 (1896), 82, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Christlicher%20Gemeinde-Kalender/1892-1900/1896/.

Note 8: From the “Danziger Chronik,” cited in “Familiengeschichte des Cornelius Regier, 1743–1793 und seiner Nachkommen (Auszug),” (Bolanden-Weierhof: Mennonitische Forschungsstelle, n.d.), 12, https://chortitza.org/Pis/Regier.pdf.

Note 9: “Lehn Diary,” transliteration and translation by Waldemar Henry Lehn, 2010. From Mennonite Heritage Archives, Winnipeg, MB.

Note 10: Geistreiches Gesangbuch, worin nebst denen Psalmen Davids eine Samlung auserlesener alter und neuer Lieder zu finden ist, zur allgemenen Erbauung herausgegeben, edited by Gerhard Wiebe (Königsberg: Kanter, 1767/1775), https://mla.bethelks.edu/books/783_952_G279_1775_c3/.

Note 11: Geistreiches Gesangbuch, zur öffentlichen und besondern Erbauung der Mennonitischen Gemeine in und vor der Stadt Danzig, edited by Hans van Steen (Marienwerder, West Preußen, 1780), 4 (link). See Hans-Jürgen Goertz, Pieter Post and Peter Letkemann, “Gemeindegesang und Gesangbücher der Mennoniten (Europa),” in Mennonitisches Lexikon (MennLex), volume V, http://mennlex.de/doku.php?id=top:gemeindegesang.

Note 12: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/creating-spiritual-tradition-nine-core.html.

Note 13: See notes 6 and 8 above.

Note 14: Cf. Jakob Wienß to Joh. Kaunhowen, June 21, 1806, letter, “Alte Briefe,” Mennonitische Warte 4, no. 42 (Juni 1938), 230, https://chortitza.org/Buch/Brief2.pdf; also cited by David G. Rempel to Mrs. Yeomans, June 19, 1970, letter, David G. Rempel Papers, Box 6, File 2. From Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library, University of Toronto. Toronto, ON.

Note 15: See GAMEO article by Cornelius Krahn: https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Geistreiches_Gesangbuch. The entry erroneously does not distinguish between the West Prussian 1767 hymnal and the 1780 Danzig hymnal.


Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 1 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accuarte and carefully considered. ~ANF American Mennonite leaders who supported Trump will be responding to the election results in the near future. Sometimes a template or sample conference address helps to formulate one’s own text. To that end I offer the following. When Hitler came to power in 1933, Mennonites in Germany sent official greetings by telegram: “The Conference of the East and West Prussian Mennonites meeting today at Tiegenhagen in the Free City of Danzig are deeply grateful for the tremendous uprising ( Erhebung ) that God has given our people ( Volk ) through the vigor and action of [unclear], and promise our cooperation in the construction of our Fatherland, true to the Gospel motto of [our founder Menno Simons], ‘For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.’” ( Note 1 ) Hitler responded in a letter...

Mennonite Christmases in the Diary of Jacob P. Janzen, 1911-1914

The following accounts of Mennonite Christmases before the Revolution are from the unpublished diary of Jacob P. Janzen ( note 1 ). His entries are “real,” in the sense that they include all the complexities and messiness of life, with interesting detail. These accounts are from a single man in his thirties (b. 1880) in Rudnerweide, Molotschna. His entries show him as a sensitive, humble, and curious man, who was certainly well-informed about life in the community.          --Arnold Neufeldt-Fast -- Christmas 1911 (Janzen was working at "Bethania Mental Hospital" on the Dnjeper River near Einlage, note 2 ) “Some of the staff went to [director Peter] Schellenbergs to practice Christmas songs. I did not go. Aganetha Woelk [patient] had broken several window panes; I had to replace them and it got quite late. But while working in the female patients’ quarters I had a chance to see how they made beautiful, but inexpensive ornaments for the Christmas tree. Nur...

The Flight to Moscow 1929

In 1926, my grandfather’s sister Justina Fast (b. 1896) and her husband Peter Görzen moved from Krassikow, Neu Samara (Soviet Union) to village no. 5 Dejewka, Orenburg. “We thought we would live our lives here with our children secure in the hands of God. But the times were becoming turbulent,” Justina recalled. In May 1929 they travelled back to Krassikow for Pentecost to visit with her mother, brothers and their families. But when they returned to their home, she writes, “… a large quota of grain was demanded of us. But we had nothing, and the harvest was not yet in. Then we heard that many were planning to move to Canada, including my three siblings with my mother, and my husband's three sisters too. My husband decided to go to Moscow first to see if it was possible and what was required for emigration. We made the decision to leave when the harvest was complete. At that time so many people were leaving [for Moscow], and early in September we sold everything we had. Only the b...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 2 of 4 to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF In a few short months the American government will start to fulfill its campaign promises to round up and deport undocumented immigrants. The responsible cabinet members have already been appointed. By early Spring 2025, Mennonite pastors/leaders who supported Trump will need to speak to and address the matter in their congregations. It will be difficult to find words. How might they prepare? Sometimes a template from the past is helpful. To that end, I offer my summary of a text by retired Mennonite pastor and conference leader Gustav Kraemer. (There is a nice entry on him in the Mennonite Encyclopedia,  GAMEO ). My summary is faithful to the German original, 1938. With only a few minor changes, it could be useful for the coming year. Adaptations are mostly in square brackets, with the key at the bottom of the post. ...