Skip to main content

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF

Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations

Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out.

The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags.

First, your congregational by-laws. 

It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the Heubuden Mennonite Church, West Prussia, together with Mennonite Prof. Benjamin Unruh drafted articles of incorporation for the new “Conference of Mennonite Congregations of German Nationality in the Province of Wartheland,” March 1944 (note 1). It limited church membership to "citizens only" in German-annexed Poland (e.g., no Poles). At the time Germany too was in the midst of the "largest deportation operation in [its] history.” However, only about 1 million non-citizens were deported by Feb. 1944; Pres. Trump has spoken of 12 to 20 million, which sounds very ambitious; but even if it is only a few million he would benefit from cooperation from the churches. Your by-law changes should also clearly indicate that the congregation will not offer sanctuary.

Second, an alert

There will be congregations in the conference led by or welcoming of (e.g., offering sanctuary) undocumented immigrants. They will want to dominate denominational gatherings in the next year, determine invited speakers, publications and educational materials—and maybe even the Mennonite World Conference in the summer. This kind of backroom planning happened for the Mennonite World Conference in 1936 in Amsterdam/Elspeet (also the 400th anniversary of Menno’s identification as an Anabaptist). Planners of the conference were extremely sensitive to the developing political situation in Europe. Dutch organizer Fritz Kuiper in a letter to Christian Neff (June 8, 1935) noted his fear that any advance notice of those themes with current relevance could “torpedo” the conference from the start. Organizers colluded to keep Benjamin Unruh off the speakers’ list, but later gave him a “safe” theme to talk on (note 2). Unruh was a supporter of new laws limiting citizenship in Germany. Interestingly these same Dutch organizers a decade later created bogus identifications/passports (Menno-Pass; see below) to allow illegals from the Soviet Union to enter The Netherlands in 1946 (note 3). Prepare for such tricks.

Third, yes, you are still an Anabaptist! 

You will be criticized by left-leaning, woke Mennonites saying that your support of President Trump is at odds with your faith. However, in the 1930s and 1940s Mennonite scholars like Prof. Unruh and Dr. Horst Quiring pointed to the work 16th century Anabaptist Dr. Balthasar Hubmaier for whom bearing arms and holding high government offices was permissible (note 4). Unruh published his own astute “Anabaptist Vision” the next year after the conference (note 5). So you're ok.

Fourth, an appropriate attitude is important

When 35,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union were evacuated and resettled in German-annexed Poland (with other ethnic Germans from the east), an equivalent number of Poles had to be deported—some to the “General Governorate for the Occupied Polish Region,” and some sent to German occupied France as farm labourers. Only those ineligible for citizenship were designated for deportation, of course. The deportation machinery operated very efficiently; the attitude of most Mennonites (and other Germans from the east) while deportations took place was completely passive, as one Pole recalled some years later (note 6). That was helpful for the effort—a strategy you may wish to consider as the deportations begin.

Fifth, identify a Mennonite leader who is well-connected to the Trump organization 

He or she could be of special assistance for the Trump-Mennonites in agricultural areas (not unlike Prof. Unruh). Undocumented people do 25% of the agricultural work in the USA today; you can recommend that your local deportations happen in a staged manner which will not disrupt agricultural production. Again, our tradition has witnessed a roll out and can help with a tried example in Wartheland. All illegal immigrants must first be registered; you could help with that effort to ensure no one is overlooked. Next, prioritize (as in Germany, 1944) which non-citizens are most needed for farming to ensure no agricultural disruption. This would only be an interim measure, of course. Logistics: all "to-be-deported" families should be required to live in one nearby area together (doubling up families worked best in 1944). A central local office could keep an ordered list. When Pres. Trump’s representatives ask for, e.g., 5 families this month from your district to fill quota, then military assets should be employed for quick, efficient removal (within one half day ideally).

Sixth, an example 

See attached Deportation Completion Forms from Storchnest, Warthegau. One Mennonite boy whose family received a house in Storchnest—taken from a family identified for deportation—recalled years later in Canada that those were “not happy people” probably because they were “subservient”—and of course they were; they no longer had a right to be there long term! He also noticed that “through corruption and sly methods these people managed to retain enough goods and food so that they could survive” (note 7). That is a reminder that you will need to be on guard; perhaps a local militia can help, and Mennonites from your congregation should be free to volunteer if they feel called by conscience. Your congregational by-laws should be amended to state this clearly (contact me for good examples from Prof. Unruh).

There are many of precedents in our rich Mennonite story! However the Wartheland example was only for a million or so people. President Trump will need even greater support for the numbers he has promised American voters. It will be messy work and not easy; those involved in the 1944 deportations required at least two generations to process their feelings of guilt. Thank God though that America can have full confidence in President Trump; God has called (and saved!) him for a moment like this.

PS Reminder: Don’t forget about that congregational AGM in January! Set up your agenda early and prepare well for these changes coming to America.

                                                ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast





---Notes---

Attached Deportation Completion Forms, Storchnest, Wartheland District of Lissa. From Polish State Archives at Poznan, 53/1009/0/2/9. https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/de/jednostka/-/jednostka/1261501.

Note 1: “Satzung der Mennonitischen Gemeindekirche im Wartheland” (March 1944 Submission), from Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof, Vereinigung Collection, folder 1944.

Note 2: Frits Kuiper to Christian Neff, letter, April 29, 1935, from Mennonite Library and Archives (Bethel College), V 6, box 15, folder 8, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/V_6/box%2015/folder%208/316.jpg; re: “torpedo,” Frits Kuiper to Christian Neff, June 1935, idem, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/V_6/box%2015/folder%208/293.jpg; Harold Bender to Frits Kuiper, Dec. 22, 1935, with recommendations of who to keep off list of speakers at World Conference; https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/V_6/box%2015/folder%208/292.jpg. Unruh was given a safe topic, from the organizer’s perspective: “Die Mennoniten in Rußland in Geschichte und Gegenwart,” in Der Allgemeine Kongreß der Mennoniten gehalten in Amsterdam, Elspeet, Witmarsum (Holland) 29. Juni bis 3. Juli 1936, ed. by Christian Neff (Karslruhe: Schneider, 1936), 60-64, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1936,%20MWC,%20Der%20Allgemeine%20Konferenz%20der%20Mennoniten/Better%20Copy/DSCF1220.JPG.

Note 3: See Gerlof D. Homan, “‘We Have Come to Love Them’: Russian Mennonite Refugees in the Netherlands, 1945–1947,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 25 (2007), 39–59; 42; 40f., https://jms.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/jms/article/view/1223/1215; also P. Dyck and E. Dyck, Up from the Rubble, 102f

Note 4: See Horst Quiring, “The Anthropology of Pilgram Marbeck,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 9, no. 4 (October 1935), 155–164 (German online: https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Geschichtsblaetter/1936-1940/DSCF4453.JPG).

Note 5: Benjamin Unruh, “Das Wesen des evangelischen Täufertums und Mennonitentums,” Mennonitische Jugendwarte 17, no. 1 (February 1937), 6–15, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Jugendwarte/DSCF9305.JPG.

Note 6: Czesław Łuczak, “Chronicle: Records on the Situation of Poles in the Warte Land,” Instytut Zachodni (Poznań), Western Affairs 8, no. 1 (1967), 170. Łuczak’s reference is to all “ethnic Germans” who arrived in Wartheland and simply stood by and were quiet.

Note 7: “Michaelsburg,” private family correspondence to author, August 1, 2024.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), November 24, 2024. https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2024/11/what-is-church-to-say-letter-4-of-4-to.html




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Church to Say? Letter 1 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accuarte and carefully considered. ~ANF American Mennonite leaders who supported Trump will be responding to the election results in the near future. Sometimes a template or sample conference address helps to formulate one’s own text. To that end I offer the following. When Hitler came to power in 1933, Mennonites in Germany sent official greetings by telegram: “The Conference of the East and West Prussian Mennonites meeting today at Tiegenhagen in the Free City of Danzig are deeply grateful for the tremendous uprising ( Erhebung ) that God has given our people ( Volk ) through the vigor and action of [unclear], and promise our cooperation in the construction of our Fatherland, true to the Gospel motto of [our founder Menno Simons], ‘For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.’” ( Note 1 ) Hitler responded in a letter
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 2 of 4 to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF In a few short months the American government will start to fulfill its campaign promises to round up and deport undocumented immigrants. The responsible cabinet members have already been appointed. By early Spring 2025, Mennonite pastors/leaders who supported Trump will need to speak and address the matter in congregations. It will be difficult to find words. How can they prepare? Sometimes a template from the past is helpful. To that end, I offer my summary of a text by retired Mennonite pastor and conference leader Gustav Kraemer. (There is a nice entry on him in the Mennonite Encyclopedia ( GAMEO ). My summary is faithful to the German original, 1938. With only a few minor changes, it could be useful. Adaptations are mostly underlined, with the key at the bottom of the post. ------ Retired [American] Pastor and co
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathers in the
Post a Comment
Read more

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the
Post a Comment
Read more

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and
Post a Comment
Read more

Simple Refugee Wedding: My grandparents (1931)

My father was born less than a year after these 1931 wedding photos. Jacob Fast and Helen Janzen had been in Paraguay less than 8 months—see the MCC telegram—and tragedy had already struck both refugees families. Jacob’s first wife and a daughter became victims of the epidemic that ravaged the new colony of Fernheim in those first months. He was now a widower at age 39—with an infant and other children without a mother. Helene was single and 29 years old. Her mother too had died from the same epidemic; her father was partially crippled. They had come from southern Ukrainian community of Spat, Crimea; Fast was from Ural Mountains area in Russia where South Russian Mennonites had created a “daughter colony” a generation earlier.   Each had siblings who fled to Moscow in 1929 with them and who were accepted by Canada in 1930. My grandparents however were rejected—she was a single woman with frail parents; he was a man with an ill child. Perhaps in contexts like these the falling-i
Post a Comment
Read more

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate
Post a Comment
Read more

Volendam and the Arrival in South America, 1947

The Volendam arrived at the port in Buenos Aires, Argentina on February 22, 1947, at 5 PM, exactly three weeks after leaving from Bremerhaven. They would be followed by three more refugee ships in 1948. The harassing experiences of refugee life were now truly far behind them. Curiously a few months later the American Embassy in Moscow received a formal note of protest claiming that Mennonites, who were Soviet citizens, had been cleared by the American military in Germany for emigration to Paraguay even though the Soviet occupation forces “did not (repeat not) give any sanction whatever for the dispatch of Soviet citizens to Paraguay” ( note 1 ). But the refugees knew that they were beyond even Stalin’s reach and, despite many misgivings about the Chaco, believed they were the hands of good people and a sovereign God. In Buenos Aires the Volendam was anticipated by North American Mennonite Central Committee workers responsible for the next leg of the resettlement journey. Elisabeth
Post a Comment
Read more

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t
Post a Comment
Read more