Skip to main content

“Politically backwards but clean and high level of care”: Bethania Mental Hospital as Icon

The Bethania Mental Hospital was established by Mennonites in 1910 and remembered as their greatest cultural achievement. After the Bolshevik Revolution it was taken over by the province of Ekaterinoslav and nationalized in 1925, but supported in large part by the Mennonite community. A 1925 "political" assessment of the institution provides a window onto government concerns about "German" Mennonites more generally. 

The leadership and staffing (ca. 65) as well as a large number of patients (120 beds) continued to be Mennonites or Germans (note 1; pic). The following 1925 newspaper article gives us a hint of how authorities viewed the hospital and its Mennonite staff seven years after expropriation, and the connection to nearby church community more generally.

“In exemplary order, but political work needs to be improved. Located between Kitchkas (Einlage) and Chortitza; three buildings, one of which houses a kitchen, living room for visitors, the “red corner” [communist reading room] and the staff, and in the other two the women's and men's wards of the hospital, … a cattle barn and a farm, as well as houses for staff.

Nowhere will you see even any trace of garbage. The patients who have lost the appearance of a conscious are placed on … pure white linen.

To care for the mentally ill, half of whom are violent, requires a measure of tact, self-control, endurance. The hospital personnel is entirely composed of Germans - Mennonites - all with a strong work ethic, discipline and dedication.

This is facilitated by the fact that the German colonists treat the hospital and its whole population as their own offspring. The clinic was organized in 1911 by Mennonite communities and until 1919 existed exclusively on funds by the latter.

And now, when the hospitals are on the budget of the provincial health department, funds from various German communities continue to support its maintenance.

During the years of the Civil War, the sanatorium was raided many times by gangs and the property was looted. Nevertheless, the head of the community and the staff succeeded to save much.

The situation with the cult of political education among the staff is very bad. Political education needs to be delivered and conducted in a planned manner. Then one can be sure that Bethania will turn into a cultured place in all aspects." (Note 2)

This very public assessment of Bethania reflects a high level of official concern about Mennonites in 1925.

The following 1925 secret “Agitation and Propaganda Department Report” provides a fuller context:

“During the last six months [ca. November 1924 to April 1925] the work of Mennonite missionaries and ministers has increased. They agitate for strengthening Mennonite religion and at the same time agitate for emigration. Religious activity in Mennonite colonies is developing without restraint because no proper attention was given to its study.” (Note 3)

Also in May 1925 the Head of the Secret Operative Department of the GPU [Soviet secret police] and the Head of the Counter-Intelligence Office of the GPU cited what they called a “very classified report to the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Berlin” from the German consul in Kharkiv which they had intercepted: despite “the prohibition to have any religious organizations,” Mennonites are able “to arrange their life in spite of communist pressure”—they simply “exist under the name of the Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage” [Mennonite cultural, social and economic union]. The same classified report deemed Mennonites to be “the best German elements” in Ukraine. This reinforced deep Soviet suspicions that the German government considered “Mennonites as a base on which it can rely in the USSR” (notes 4).

The Central Bureau of the German Section of the Central Committee of the Communist Party in Ukraine agreed in November 1925 to implement more “intensive and systematic” work and political education among “rank-and-file” Mennonites at the village level, in hopes that peasants “from the plow” would gradually be drawn into the party, who would then “carry out the reorganization and thereby liberate themselves from the harmful influence of the Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage” (note 5).

This background report by the Central Bureau of the German Section to the Central Committee flagged the key problems of their Mennonite population: they are uniquely “characterized by a narrow-national [German-Mennonite] outlook, lack of class stratification, [and a] passive attitude … toward Soviet social life”—which makes party and Soviet work among them “more difficult.”

In another report of the same year: “It is extremely difficult to conduct party work in Mennonite colonies because it is carried out among a population saturated with religious fanaticism and caste isolation” (note 6).

“Extraordinary difficulties” were reported specifically in the former Mennonite colony of Chortitza (where Bethania was located), where authorities had little success in drawing the Mennonites “to active participation in the construction of the Soviet order” and into “the public life of village clubs and reading rooms.” The committee concluded that the youth were both “restrained by parents” and “by preachers in meeting houses” (note 7). In general, “[t]he political condition of colonies populated by German Mennonites until the present time is not good,” and given their peculiarities it would require “a specially careful and tactful approach,” according to the September 1925 report of the Central Bureau.

The proposed strategy would include more open peasant sessions and conferences, more German press attention with the newspaper “The New Village” (Das Neue Dorf) with rural correspondents to strengthen supervision of abuses; more funds for the purchase of “libraries, radio sets, sports equipment, moving pictures apparatus and lanterns;” the immediate dismissal of all local committee members “who discredit the party;” a new “permanent party school” with “a German as an agitation and propaganda worker;” regular reporting on work among Mennonites to the “Agitation and Propaganda Collegium,” and regional committee bureaus for further action; and, importantly, plots of land for the large number of landless in Molotschna.

Moreover, authorities were very concerned that Mennonite youth “are under a strong religious influence and take an active part in religious youth unions that act under the cover of sports organizations” and even attracting some transfer members from the Communist Party youth organization (note 8).

To counter these efforts, the plan called for “cultural and educational work among Mennonite youth by creating youth sections at village clubs and organizing sports clubs,” as well as more frequent youth conferences for Mennonites (note 9).

The Bethania Mental Hospital was located near the Dnjper River and was dismantled with the construction of the massive Dneprostroy power dam in 1927. The Mennonite community appealed to the government to keep staff and patients together in a Mennonite community, specifically at Halbstadt (Molotschna). “However, this did not materialize. On 9 May 1927 the patients, among them 33 Mennonites, were transferred to a mental hospital at Igren without the Mennonite personnel. That was the end of Bethania, one of the mot successful and generally supported projects among the Mennonites of Russia” (note 10).

For Mennonites Bethania was an icon representing the highest cultural expression of their faith community. Its dismantling was met with dismay and signaled with clarity the larger government agenda to dismantle and reconfigure the Mennonite community as such.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

 



---Notes---

Note 1: Cf. Jacob Wiebe, “Die letzte Nachricht aus Bethania,” Unser Blatt 2, no. 10 (July 1927), 304, https://chortitza.org/Pis/UB26_10.pdf; Erich Tavonius and Isaak Thiessen, "Bericht aus Molotchansk," Unser Blatt 2, no. 6 (March 1927),178-179, https://chortitza.org/Pis/UB26_06.pdf. Pic: staff posing on the adjacent Dnieper River; from personal collection by John VanDyck Jr.

Note 2 : “Колония для душевно-больных- Бетания,” Красное Запорожье no. 98 (May 2, 1925), in “Chortitza and Moltotschna Colonies in Ukrainian publications, 1913-15, edited by Alexander Panjko, 13f., https://chor.square7.ch/0v853.pdf. (Thanks to Google Translate!).

Note 3: “Report by the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine regarding issues in German colonies, Late April-early May 1925,” in John B. Toews and Paul Toews, eds., Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine (1922–1927): Mennonite and Soviet Documents, translated by J. B. Toews, O. Shmakina, and W. Regehr (Fresno, CA: Center for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 2011) 270, https://archive.org/details/unionofcitizenso0000unse.

Note 4: “Instructions of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine for registration and minimizing the influence of religious groups, including Mennonites, May 25, 1925,” in Toews and Toews, Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine, 271. It was well known that B. B. Janz had been using German diplomatic courier service to communicate with Benjamin Unruh in Germany since November 1921. Cf. John B. Toews, With Courage to Spare: The Life of B. B. Janz (1877–1964) (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978) 26, https://archive.org/details/WithCourageToSpareOCRopt/page/n37/mode/2up. On "Menno-Union" (Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine), see previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/1921-formation-of-union-of-citizens-of.html.

Note 5: “Minutes of a joint session of the Central Bureau of the German Section of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine with German sections of okrug committees about work with Mennonites November 10–12, 1925,” in Toews and Toews, Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine, 318–324.

Note 6: Cf. “Conclusions of the Commission of the Presidium Commission following inspection of the Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage, Late July 1925,” in ibid., 291–296; 294.

Note 7: “Report of the German Section of the Zaporozhye Okrug Committee, January 4, 1926,” in ibid., 324–329. Similarly, see the 1924 newspaper piece: "Коммунист № 263 Дата: 16.11.1924 В немецких колониях Запорожья (От нашего корреспондента)," in “Chortitza and Moltotschna Colonies in Ukrainian publications," 2f.

Note 8: Cited in Matthew D. Pauly, Breaking the Tongue: Language, Education, and Power in Soviet Ukraine, 1923-1934 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014), 181.

Note 9: “Minutes of a joint session of the Central Bureau of the German Section of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine with German sections of okrug committees about work with Mennonites November 10-12, 1925,” in Toews and Toews, Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine, 318–324.

Note 10: From “Bethania Mental Hospital (Chortitza Mennonite Settlement),” GAMEO, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Bethania_Mental_Hospital_(Chortitza_Mennonite_Settlement,_Zaporizhia_Oblast,_Ukraine). See note 1 for source. Cf. Helmut T. Huebert, “The Bethania Mental Hospital of Russia,1910-1927,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 29 (2011), 215-219, https://jms.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/jms/article/view/1414.


 Print Friendly and PDF
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß";  note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Between Monarchs" a lot can happen (like revolt). A Mennonite "Accession" Prayer for the Monarch

It is surprising for many to learn that Russian Mennonites sang the Russian national anthem "God save the Tsar" in special worship services ... frequently! We have a "Mennonite prayer" and sermon sample for the accession of the monarch ( Thronbesteigung ) or its anniversary, with closing prayer-- and another Mennonite sampler of a coronation ( Krönung ) prayer, sermon and closing prayer ( note 1 ). After 70 years with one monarch, the manual is made for a time like this--try sharing it with your Canadian Mennonite pastor ;) Technically there is no “between” monarchs: “The Queen is Dead. Long live the King!” But there is much that happens or can happen before the coronation of the new monarch. Including revolt. Mennonites in Molotschna had hosted Tsar Alexander I shortly before his death in 1825. Upon his death in December, Alexander's brother and heir Constantine declined succession, and prior to the coronation of the next brother Nicholas, some 3,000 rebel (mos...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flight from Flanders to Friesland

In the latter half of the sixteenth century Protestantism gradually spread throughout the northern Netherlands in the form of Calvinism—which had a direct impact on Anabaptists. When the Northern Provinces of the Netherlands led by the exiled Protestant Prince William of Orange went to war against Spain in 1568, persecution of Anabaptists in Catholic Flanders increased again. Long before the Protestant Northern Provinces would declare independence in 1581, the inquisition against Anabaptists in Bruges, for example, had achieved its goal. With the last two Anabaptist executions in the city in 1573, the once large and thriving Mennonite congregation was extinguished. Subsequently Mennonites lived in Bruges only on rare occasions, and when present, for only a short time, as for example the well-known art historian Karel van Mander in 1582 ( note 1 ). In the Northern Provinces Calvinism had become attractive theologically and politically. Not only was Christian resistance to tyrannical gov...
Post a Comment
Read more