1921: Formation of the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine”

Famine was imminent; unprecedented drought; taxes and requisitions exceeded what was harvested; some villages had no horses; extortion and arrests were widespread; many men were disenfranchised and barred from village affairs (see note 1).

Lenin responded with the 1921 “New Economic Policy” (NEP), which allowed for a degree of market flexibility within the context of socialism to ward off complete economic collapse.

A fixed-tax was imposed, grain quotas were eased, farmers were allowed a small amount of land and could sell excess produce at free-market prices after taxes had been paid.

Much was in the air. In secret talks, Soviet Trade Commissar Leonid Krasin told the head of the Eastern Section in the German Foreign Office, Gustav Behrendt, that the USSR was “prepared—just like Catherine the Great of old—to call hundreds of thousands of German colonists into the land and transfer them to large, closed complexes for settlement,” especially in Turkestan and the North Caucasus, between the Sea of Azov and the Black Sea west of the Caspian Sea, where the Mennonites already had several settlements. “These colonists would be allowed to live fully undisturbed according to their own law and create a state within a state” (note 2).

Of course nothing became of that fantastical discussion point. Nonetheless, a time of recovery and compromise, with alliances between government and local organizations began; the NEP-era would last until 1928.

In the Molotschna, leaders choose to form a local “association” of about 60 villages of approximately 28,000 people which they named somewhat artificially the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine” (Verband der Bürger holländischer Herkunft)—colloquially referred to as the “Menno-Union” (Verband).

Such organizations could not be religiously based, but the designation as a unique ethnic minority group “of Dutch lineage” allowed Mennonites to legally organize independent of other German ethnic associations. It came represent all 60,000 Mennonites in Ukraine.

The adopted purposes of the Menno-Union were to pursue economic, agricultural, and “cultural” reconstruction goals, including hospitals and possibly institutions of higher education. But for Mennonites it was also a vehicle to recover and maintain their non-resistant tradition, and to seek out emigration possibilities.

The People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs’ (NKVD) response to the initial statutes of the Menno-Union in December 1921 required the removal of the word “Mennonite” and any mention of restoring the historic Mennonite culture of the colony, of laying a moral or “religious basis” to their economic activity, or of their connections to Mennonites of America and Holland.

While there was a deep concern that the Union would be “utilized for strengthening religious propaganda,” it was chartered in April 1922 (note 3).

Coinciding with this application, Mennonite leaders organized a highly secret meeting in Ohrloff on February 7, 1922, and a decision was taken to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR if at all possible (note 4). And by 1926 some 20,000 Mennonites were able to emigrate.

At the same time, the goal of the Menno-Union was to revive the economy of each village and family and their respective districts as a whole. This had largely been achieved by 1926. Pure seed varieties had been carefully cultivated and shared with Menno-Union members. Great attention was given to the breeding of purebred livestock, especially the high-milk-producing East Frisian “Red Cow” variety brought by Mennonites from Prussia over 130 years earlier, as well as to high quality pigs for the English bacon market. Both animals were lucrative for the new smaller-sized family farms, and appropriate for the limited grazing land available to each.

Horse breeding was less successful; in 1922 the Molotschna had only 15% of their pre-war horse numbers. Even as late as January 1925, 30% of farms still had no horses; 29% had one horse; 30% had two horses; 7% had three horses; 4% had four horses. Despite a frustrating start, the number of horses in the Gnadenfeld District increased 200% between 1922 and 1925; pigs were up 450%; poultry up 350%, young cattle and oxen up 70%. The Red Cow project did not grow as sharply due to the limited availability of grazing land (note 5).

At one point during this period, my grandparents' household—together with adult siblings--had 4 horses, 3 head of cattle, 2 pigs and 7 sheep.

Each family could sell or trade their own products at the village Menno-Union cooperative and connect with external markets. Shelves were stocked, and there were employment opportunities with new mills, dairies and a cheese factory, as well as work for blacksmiths and wood-workers. The medical facility in Gnadenfeld became operational again, as well as the agricultural school—both of which the Union identified as critical for community prosperity, even if the barriers had been almost insurmountable.

“The Menno-Union appeared almost like a meteor, flashed brightly for a moment, and then disappeared—it and the majority of men that created it and who made it beneficial" (note 6), wrote one of the participants, Jacob A. Neufeld. Most of the contributors, planners and administrators of the Menno-Union were charged and imprisoned as enemies of the state, and then exiled or executed. Neufeld stops short of calling colleagues Mennonite martyrs; but they were for him like fallen Christian Mennonite soldiers.

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1 (and pic): B.B. Janz and Ph. Cornies to Study Commissioners to A. A. Friesen, Βenjamin Η. Unruh, C. H. Warkentin; (also) to the General Commission for Foreign Needs of Holland; (also) to the American Mennonite Relief, Scottdale, PA, early March 1922. Translated and edited by Harold Bender, “A Russian Mennonite Document of 1922,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 28, no. 2 (April 1954), 143–147; 144f.

Note 2: “Aufzeichnung des Ministerialdirektors Behrendt,” Berlin, March 2, 1921, in Walter Bußmann, et al., editors, Akten zur Auswärtigen Politik, Serie A (1918–1925), vol. 4: 1, Oktober 1920 bis 30. April 1921, no. 179, 382–384 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986), 383, https://digi20.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/fs2/object/goToPage/bsb00040119.html?pageNo=435.

Note 3: See reports, responses, recommended amendments, and final text in John B. Toews and Paul Toews, eds., Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine (1922–1927). Mennonite and Soviet Documents, translated by J. B. Toews, O. Shmakina, and W. Regehr (Fresno, CA: Center for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 2011), 76–98, https://archive.org/details/unionofcitizenso0000unse.

Note 4: See Janz and Cornies letter above, n.1.

Note 5: Cf. Landwirt 1, no. 4–5 (October 1925); Landwirt 2, no. 3–4 (10–11) (March–April 1926), https://chortitza.org/DPL.htm.

Note 6: Jacob A. Neufeld, “Erinnerungen eines Beteiligten des ‘Verbandes der Bürger Holländischer Herkunft in der Ukraine’” (Unpublished manuscript, 1952), 33. Mennonite Library and Archives, Bethel College. https://mla.bethelks.edu/books/289_74771_N394e/. Also translated as “Memories of the former activities of the Verband by a participant in the Union of the Citizens of Dutch Origin in the Ukraine.” Translated by Lena Unger. Bethel College, North Newton, KS, 1953; https://mla.bethelks.edu/books/289_74771_N394ea/.

Comments

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons: Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog