Skip to main content

Wartheland: Mennonite Resettlers and Deportation of Poles

This post begins with an apologies and shame towards Polish readers.

Many Canadian and South American Mennonites have a family connection to the “Great Trek” story. 35,000 Mennonites were removed from Ukraine behind the retreating German military in the Fall of 1943 and early 1944. Nazi Germany’s goal: at war’s end Wartheland (annexed Poland) would have a majority racially-German population and remain part of greater Germany. Its Poles were disposed and tens of thousands deported; Jews were destroyed.

Reichsführer SS Himmler boasted to one resettler group: Poles know that “if you bother just one hair of a German family, you and all your Polish men in your village will lose your lives” (note 1). Catholic clergy had been largely executed or banished. Polish parish churches were repurposed--in some cases for Nazi Party offices (note 2). The official representative of Soviet Mennonites, Benjamin H. Unruh—who had met Heinrich Himmler for multiple meetings a year earlier—had requested some of these spaces be made available for Mennonites (note 3). The resettlement of Mennonites in close proximity to each other in Warthegau was also made possible by Unruh.

The use of public telephones by Poles was illegal, letters and postcards written in Polish were not processed, evening curfews for Poles were imposed, and travel even by bicycle from one village to another was forbidden without a special permit (note 4). The District of Dietfurt (where most of the Gnadenfeld Trek group was resettled, including my 6-year-old mother) published an interdiction against selling fruit and certain kinds of vegetables to Poles (note 5).

Poles were punished with two days in prison for not saluting a uniformed German (note 6). Elementary schooling for Polish children continued; but German was to be taught “only to the extent that it is necessary for the next generation of Polish workers, whom we need to fulfill the war and reconstruction tasks, to be able to make themselves understood in German; i.e., German vocabulary will be learned, but the language may not be spoken with grammatical correctness” (i.e., so as not to pass as a German; note 7).

One Mennonite resettler recalled:

"[T]he German authorities required us to wear swastikas …; the Polish residents had to wear a large 'P.' One day, as a seventeen year old, I went to the butcher shop. When I saw the long line-up, naturally I got behind the last person. … When the clerk at the counter noticed the swastika on my jacket, she motioned for me to come forward and be served. The local residents had to wait, just because they were Polish." (Note 8)

Food, clothing, medicine and schooling were provided for the resettlers at no cost by German authorities. Their identification papers stated clearly: “All administrative offices of the Party and State are requested to provide all necessary assistance to the holder of this document.”

By force German troops “ordered [Polish] residents and owners of the houses to move out and settle in barns. In our particular situation, the Poles were still moving their belongings out as we arrived to move in. None of us could do anything about that,” wrote one Mennonite afterwards (note 9). The dispossessed families were permitted to live with relatives on the edge of the village if they were useful for agricultural production. “The way the Poles were being treated was so foreign and incomprehensible to us ... This is of great embarrassment to us, because years ago we too were chased from our own homes and farms (note 10).

The involuntary resettlement of the majority Poles happened at a different pace in each Warthegau district. Eichenbrück—where some Mennonite women from the Gnadenfeld group were given employment—saw 6,946 new German arrivals in the first six months of 1944 with only four deportations, but with larger deportations planned for July (note 11); by August 1, 1,061 Poles had been deported (note 12).

In the District of Hohensalza, the chief medical officer reported that in April “2,817 Russian-Germans were settled in the district ... and were accommodated on the estates or in apartments that were partly vacated by Poles. Evacuation from Poland did not take place” (note 13). The Nazi Party’s Racial Political Office advised Himmler that approximately one million Poles had sufficient German blood to become assimilated for the Germanization of the extended living space (Lebensraum) (note 14). However the majority of Poles were to be relocated to reservations on the eastern edges of Poland.

Once in their new home, each "Black Sea German" household received a small amount of cash from the Party—60 RM plus 10 to 30 RM per child. The NSV Party organization distributed textile articles, footwear, woolen blankets, straw sacks, bed linen, beds, tables, chairs, armoires, and other basic household necessities required for a successful start (note 15). Some of these goods were expropriated from Poles or Jews.

Many of the Great Trek refugees arrived with lice, rickets and scabies, but also tuberculosis and trachoma. Provisional hospital rooms were set up in each refugee camp to isolate the sick, under the personal care of local doctors with multiple visits per week. Pharmaceuticals were available; very ill children were brought to city hospitals. Wards for Poles were cleared and cleaned for this purpose. Only two hospitals in Warthegau were open to Poles by 1943 (note 16).

It was an offence for Volksdeutsche to return items to Poles whose homes they now possessed and with whom they “often had more in common than they did with Germans from the Reich” (note 17).

Susanna Toews gratefully recalled that “[i]nspite of the fact that we occupied their homes, the Polish people were kind to us. However, we were forbidden to talk to them” (note 18). But from the perspective of Poles it was seen differently, Łuczak argues. The “machinery of occupation set in motion to fight against any sign of Polish life would not have operated so efficiently had it not enjoyed the everyday help of the great majority of Germans inhabiting the Warta Land. … Their attitude towards the discriminatory actions of the authorities against Poles was completely passive” (note 19).

In this context Mennonite leader Benjamin H. Unruh had a clear and new vision for church, and by June 1944 authorities were prepared to approve his articles of incorporation for the “Mennonite Congregational Church of German Nationality. ” With the assistance of legal counsel Gustav Reimer of the Heubuden, its constitution limited membership to those of “German nationality.” On principle Christians of Jewish or Slavic ethnic background would be excluded from this church. Unruh was full of optimism: “Today we are facing a new Reformation,” he wrote, and a united Mennonite Congregational Church had a role to play. It can “exemplify” to the larger Protestant “sister churches” what it means to be both “a true community of faith and a pioneer and shock troop (Stoßgruppe) for the whole … united in prayer, witness and work in the service of our dear German Volk!" (note 20). This image of a shock troop--language used for Hitler's paramilitary--was as close as Unruh and colleagues could come to see the church as a culturally critical embodiment of the Gospel.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Map of Reichsgau Wartheland from https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landkreis_Dietfurt_(Wartheland)#/media/Datei:Wartheland.png. For a detailed map of Altburgund, cf. https://kpbc.umk.pl/dlibra/publication/167966/edition/170631/content; and Rolf Jehke, Territoriale Veränderungen in Deutschland und deutsch verwalteten Gebieten 1874 – 1945 (online), http://territorial.de/wart/wart.htm.

Note 1: In Valdis O. Lumans, Hitler’s Auxiliaries: The Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle and the German National Minorities of Europe, 1933–1945 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1993), 197.

Note 2: Cf. the discussion around a baroque church in Protection of Monuments, March 22, 1941, NAC 53/299/0, series 7.2, file 2970, 1, no. 5, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/jednostka/-/jednostka/1049629. Cf. also “Trial of Gauleiter Artur Greiser, Case No. 74, June 21–July 7, 1946,” Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 13 at 70. Supreme National Tribunal of Poland, July 7, 1946, http://www.worldcourts.com/imt/eng/decisions/1946.07.07_Poland_v_Greiser.pdf. The closure of Catholic churches was noted by contemporary Jacob A. Neufeld without comment (Path of Thorns: Soviet Mennonite Life under Communist and Nazi Rule, edited by H. L. Dyck, translated by H. L. Dyck and S. Dyck (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014), 300.

Note 3: Unruh reflects on the Himmler visit at various points to denominational colleagues. See also “Notizen,” Box 2, file 7, 1919-1957, Unruh Collection, Weierhof. On Unruh's proposal for the new Mennonite church/conference of congregations in Warthegau, cf. Benjamin Unruh to Peter Bergmann, Letter, June 6, 1944, 2. From Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof, Benjamin Unruh Collection, folder “Correspondence with Abraham Braun, 1930, 1940, 1944–45.” Also Horst Gerlach, “Mennonites, the Molotschna, and the Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle in the Second World War,” translated by John D. Thiesen, Mennonite Life 41, no. 3 (1986), 4–9; 8, https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1986sep.pdf. On Unruh see my published essay, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/bitstream/handle/20.500.12730/1571/Neufeldt-Fast_Arnold_2022a.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. 

Note 4: Doc. 4, 15, 16 & 17, in Czesław Łuczak, “Chronicle: Records on the Situation of Poles in the Warte Land,” Instytut Zachodni (Poznań), Western Affairs 8, no. 1 (1967), 172, 180–182.

Note 5: Doc. 18, in Łuczak, “Chronicle,” 182.

Note 6: Doc. 3 & Doc. 22, in Łuczak, “Chronicle,” 172; 189.

Note 7: Greiser, Circular on the use of the Polish language by Poles, February 23, 1943, February 23, 1943, p. 2. From: Instytut Zachodni Poznań, https://www.iz.poznan.pl/archiwum/zasob/.

Note 8: Jacob Braun, The Long Road to Freedom (Winnipeg, MB: Word Alive, 2011), 82.

Note 9: J. Braun, The Long Road to Freedom, 80; cf. also A. A. Töws, ed., Mennonitische Märtyrer der jüngsten Vergangenheit und der Gegenwart, vol. 2: Der große Leidensweg (North Clearbrook, BC: Self-published, 1954), 381.

Note 10: Jacob A. Neufeld, Tiefenwege. Erfahrungen und Erlebnisse von Russland-Mennoniten in zwei Jahrzehnten bis 1949 (Virgil, ON: Niagara, 1958), 179f.

Note 11: July 4, 1944, State Health Office Eichenbrück Report, Transport Niemców znad Morza Czarnego na teren Kraju Warty (Transport of Germans from the Black Sea to the Wartheland; from NAC, 53/299/0, series 2.2, file 1979, 224, no. 232, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/jednostka/-/jednostka/1049368. Cf. J. Neufeld, Path of Thorns, 299; 325.

Note 12: August 4, 1944, State Health Office Eichenbrück Report, Transport 318, no. 327.

Note 13: May 5, 1944, State Health Office Hohensalza Report, Transport 15, no. 19.

Note 14: Lumans, Himmler’s Auxiliaries, 185.

Note 15: January 25, 1944, Governor for Reich Gau Wartheland, Unterbringung, 12–15, no. 16–19; also March 13, 1944, Reich Governor for the Reich Gau Wartheland, Unterbringung, 161, no. 180. From: Unterbringung der Schwarzmeerdeutsche. Der Reichsstatthalter im Reichsgau Wartheland Posen (GK 62) / Namiestnik Rzeszy w Okręgu Kraju Warty. From NAC, 53/299/0, series 2.2, file 1978, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/zespol/-/zespol/13390.

Note 16: Transport, no. 136. Also Tuberkulosenschutz, September 16, 1943, NAC 53/299/0, series 2.5, file 2215: 301, no. 293, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/jednostka/-/jednostka/1049717. 

Note 17: Doris Bergen, “The Volksdeutsche of Eastern Europe and the Collapse of the Nazi Empire, 1944–1945,” in The Impact of Nazism: New Perspectives on the Third Reich and its Legacy, edited by Alan E. Steinweis and Daniel E. Rogers, 101–128 (Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press, 2003), 112.

Note 18: Susanna Toews, Trek to Freedom: The Escape of Two Sisters from South Russia during World War II, translated by Helen Megli (Winkler, MB: Heritage Valley, 1976), 31. Cf. also Łuczak, “Chronicle."

Note 19: Łuczak, “Chronicle,” 170.

Note 20:  Benjamin H. Unruh to Vereinigung Executive (“Zur Einigungsfrage”), January 26, 1944, 10, from Benjamin Unruh Collection, "Abraham Braun Correspondence," Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Wartheland: Mennonite Resettlers and Deportation of Poles,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), July 14, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/wartheland-mennonite-resettlers-and.html. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The End of Schardau (and other Molotschna villages), 1941

My grandmother was four-years old when her parents moved from Petershagen, Molotschna to Schardau in 1908. This story is larger than that of Schardau, but tells how this village and many others in Molotschna were evacuated by Stalin days before the arrival of German troops in 1941. -ANF The bridge across the Dnieper at Chortitza was destroyed by retreating Soviet troops on August 18, 1941 and the hydroelectric dam completed near Einlage in 1932 was also dynamited by NKVD personnel—killing at least 20,000 locals downstream, and forcing the Germans to cross further south at Nikopol. For the next six-and-a-half weeks, the old Mennonite settlement area of Chortitza was continuously shelled by Soviet troops from Zaporozhje on the east side of the river ( note 1 ). The majority of Russian Germans in Crimea and Ukraine paid dearly for Germany’s Blitzkrieg and plans for racially-based population resettlements. As early as August 3, 1941, the Supreme Command of the Soviet Forces received noti...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more