Skip to main content

Wartheland: Mennonite Resettlers and Deportation of Poles

This post begins with an apologies and shame towards Polish readers.

Many Canadian and South American Mennonites have a family connection to the “Great Trek” story. 35,000 Mennonites were removed from Ukraine behind the retreating German military in the Fall of 1943 and early 1944. Nazi Germany’s goal: at war’s end Wartheland (annexed Poland) would have a majority racially-German population and remain part of greater Germany. Its Poles were disposed and tens of thousands deported; Jews were destroyed.

Reichsführer SS Himmler boasted to one resettler group: Poles know that “if you bother just one hair of a German family, you and all your Polish men in your village will lose your lives” (note 1). Catholic clergy had been largely executed or banished. Polish parish churches were repurposed--in some cases for Nazi Party offices (note 2). The official representative of Soviet Mennonites, Benjamin H. Unruh—who had met Heinrich Himmler for multiple meetings a year earlier—had requested some of these spaces be made available for Mennonites (note 3). The resettlement of Mennonites in close proximity to each other in Warthegau was also made possible by Unruh.

The use of public telephones by Poles was illegal, letters and postcards written in Polish were not processed, evening curfews for Poles were imposed, and travel even by bicycle from one village to another was forbidden without a special permit (note 4). The District of Dietfurt (where most of the Gnadenfeld Trek group was resettled, including my 6-year-old mother) published an interdiction against selling fruit and certain kinds of vegetables to Poles (note 5).

Poles were punished with two days in prison for not saluting a uniformed German (note 6). Elementary schooling for Polish children continued; but German was to be taught “only to the extent that it is necessary for the next generation of Polish workers, whom we need to fulfill the war and reconstruction tasks, to be able to make themselves understood in German; i.e., German vocabulary will be learned, but the language may not be spoken with grammatical correctness” (i.e., so as not to pass as a German; note 7).

One Mennonite resettler recalled:

"[T]he German authorities required us to wear swastikas …; the Polish residents had to wear a large 'P.' One day, as a seventeen year old, I went to the butcher shop. When I saw the long line-up, naturally I got behind the last person. … When the clerk at the counter noticed the swastika on my jacket, she motioned for me to come forward and be served. The local residents had to wait, just because they were Polish." (Note 8)

Food, clothing, medicine and schooling were provided for the resettlers at no cost by German authorities. Their identification papers stated clearly: “All administrative offices of the Party and State are requested to provide all necessary assistance to the holder of this document.”

By force German troops “ordered [Polish] residents and owners of the houses to move out and settle in barns. In our particular situation, the Poles were still moving their belongings out as we arrived to move in. None of us could do anything about that,” wrote one Mennonite afterwards (note 9). The dispossessed families were permitted to live with relatives on the edge of the village if they were useful for agricultural production. “The way the Poles were being treated was so foreign and incomprehensible to us ... This is of great embarrassment to us, because years ago we too were chased from our own homes and farms (note 10).

The involuntary resettlement of the majority Poles happened at a different pace in each Warthegau district. Eichenbrück—where some Mennonite women from the Gnadenfeld group were given employment—saw 6,946 new German arrivals in the first six months of 1944 with only four deportations, but with larger deportations planned for July (note 11); by August 1, 1,061 Poles had been deported (note 12).

In the District of Hohensalza, the chief medical officer reported that in April “2,817 Russian-Germans were settled in the district ... and were accommodated on the estates or in apartments that were partly vacated by Poles. Evacuation from Poland did not take place” (note 13). The Nazi Party’s Racial Political Office advised Himmler that approximately one million Poles had sufficient German blood to become assimilated for the Germanization of the extended living space (Lebensraum) (note 14). However the majority of Poles were to be relocated to reservations on the eastern edges of Poland.

Once in their new home, each "Black Sea German" household received a small amount of cash from the Party—60 RM plus 10 to 30 RM per child. The NSV Party organization distributed textile articles, footwear, woolen blankets, straw sacks, bed linen, beds, tables, chairs, armoires, and other basic household necessities required for a successful start (note 15). Some of these goods were expropriated from Poles or Jews.

Many of the Great Trek refugees arrived with lice, rickets and scabies, but also tuberculosis and trachoma. Provisional hospital rooms were set up in each refugee camp to isolate the sick, under the personal care of local doctors with multiple visits per week. Pharmaceuticals were available; very ill children were brought to city hospitals. Wards for Poles were cleared and cleaned for this purpose. Only two hospitals in Warthegau were open to Poles by 1943 (note 16).

It was an offence for Volksdeutsche to return items to Poles whose homes they now possessed and with whom they “often had more in common than they did with Germans from the Reich” (note 17).

Susanna Toews gratefully recalled that “[i]nspite of the fact that we occupied their homes, the Polish people were kind to us. However, we were forbidden to talk to them” (note 18). But from the perspective of Poles it was seen differently, Łuczak argues. The “machinery of occupation set in motion to fight against any sign of Polish life would not have operated so efficiently had it not enjoyed the everyday help of the great majority of Germans inhabiting the Warta Land. … Their attitude towards the discriminatory actions of the authorities against Poles was completely passive” (note 19).

In this context Mennonite leader Benjamin H. Unruh had a clear and new vision for church, and by June 1944 authorities were prepared to approve his articles of incorporation for the “Mennonite Congregational Church of German Nationality. ” With the assistance of legal counsel Gustav Reimer of the Heubuden, its constitution limited membership to those of “German nationality.” On principle Christians of Jewish or Slavic ethnic background would be excluded from this church. Unruh was full of optimism: “Today we are facing a new Reformation,” he wrote, and a united Mennonite Congregational Church had a role to play. It can “exemplify” to the larger Protestant “sister churches” what it means to be both “a true community of faith and a pioneer and shock troop (Stoßgruppe) for the whole … united in prayer, witness and work in the service of our dear German Volk!" (note 20). This image of a shock troop--language used for Hitler's paramilitary--was as close as Unruh and colleagues could come to see the church as a culturally critical embodiment of the Gospel.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Map of Reichsgau Wartheland from https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landkreis_Dietfurt_(Wartheland)#/media/Datei:Wartheland.png. For a detailed map of Altburgund, cf. https://kpbc.umk.pl/dlibra/publication/167966/edition/170631/content; and Rolf Jehke, Territoriale Veränderungen in Deutschland und deutsch verwalteten Gebieten 1874 – 1945 (online), http://territorial.de/wart/wart.htm.

Note 1: In Valdis O. Lumans, Hitler’s Auxiliaries: The Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle and the German National Minorities of Europe, 1933–1945 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1993), 197.

Note 2: Cf. the discussion around a baroque church in Protection of Monuments, March 22, 1941, NAC 53/299/0, series 7.2, file 2970, 1, no. 5, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/jednostka/-/jednostka/1049629. Cf. also “Trial of Gauleiter Artur Greiser, Case No. 74, June 21–July 7, 1946,” Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 13 at 70. Supreme National Tribunal of Poland, July 7, 1946, http://www.worldcourts.com/imt/eng/decisions/1946.07.07_Poland_v_Greiser.pdf. The closure of Catholic churches was noted by contemporary Jacob A. Neufeld without comment (Path of Thorns: Soviet Mennonite Life under Communist and Nazi Rule, edited by H. L. Dyck, translated by H. L. Dyck and S. Dyck (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014), 300.

Note 3: Unruh reflects on the Himmler visit at various points to denominational colleagues. See also “Notizen,” Box 2, file 7, 1919-1957, Unruh Collection, Weierhof. On Unruh's proposal for the new Mennonite church/conference of congregations in Warthegau, cf. Benjamin Unruh to Peter Bergmann, Letter, June 6, 1944, 2. From Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof, Benjamin Unruh Collection, folder “Correspondence with Abraham Braun, 1930, 1940, 1944–45.” Also Horst Gerlach, “Mennonites, the Molotschna, and the Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle in the Second World War,” translated by John D. Thiesen, Mennonite Life 41, no. 3 (1986), 4–9; 8, https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1986sep.pdf. On Unruh see my published essay, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/bitstream/handle/20.500.12730/1571/Neufeldt-Fast_Arnold_2022a.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. 

Note 4: Doc. 4, 15, 16 & 17, in Czesław Łuczak, “Chronicle: Records on the Situation of Poles in the Warte Land,” Instytut Zachodni (Poznań), Western Affairs 8, no. 1 (1967), 172, 180–182.

Note 5: Doc. 18, in Łuczak, “Chronicle,” 182.

Note 6: Doc. 3 & Doc. 22, in Łuczak, “Chronicle,” 172; 189.

Note 7: Greiser, Circular on the use of the Polish language by Poles, February 23, 1943, February 23, 1943, p. 2. From: Instytut Zachodni Poznań, https://www.iz.poznan.pl/archiwum/zasob/.

Note 8: Jacob Braun, The Long Road to Freedom (Winnipeg, MB: Word Alive, 2011), 82.

Note 9: J. Braun, The Long Road to Freedom, 80; cf. also A. A. Töws, ed., Mennonitische Märtyrer der jüngsten Vergangenheit und der Gegenwart, vol. 2: Der große Leidensweg (North Clearbrook, BC: Self-published, 1954), 381.

Note 10: Jacob A. Neufeld, Tiefenwege. Erfahrungen und Erlebnisse von Russland-Mennoniten in zwei Jahrzehnten bis 1949 (Virgil, ON: Niagara, 1958), 179f.

Note 11: July 4, 1944, State Health Office Eichenbrück Report, Transport Niemców znad Morza Czarnego na teren Kraju Warty (Transport of Germans from the Black Sea to the Wartheland; from NAC, 53/299/0, series 2.2, file 1979, 224, no. 232, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/jednostka/-/jednostka/1049368. Cf. J. Neufeld, Path of Thorns, 299; 325.

Note 12: August 4, 1944, State Health Office Eichenbrück Report, Transport 318, no. 327.

Note 13: May 5, 1944, State Health Office Hohensalza Report, Transport 15, no. 19.

Note 14: Lumans, Himmler’s Auxiliaries, 185.

Note 15: January 25, 1944, Governor for Reich Gau Wartheland, Unterbringung, 12–15, no. 16–19; also March 13, 1944, Reich Governor for the Reich Gau Wartheland, Unterbringung, 161, no. 180. From: Unterbringung der Schwarzmeerdeutsche. Der Reichsstatthalter im Reichsgau Wartheland Posen (GK 62) / Namiestnik Rzeszy w Okręgu Kraju Warty. From NAC, 53/299/0, series 2.2, file 1978, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/zespol/-/zespol/13390.

Note 16: Transport, no. 136. Also Tuberkulosenschutz, September 16, 1943, NAC 53/299/0, series 2.5, file 2215: 301, no. 293, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/jednostka/-/jednostka/1049717. 

Note 17: Doris Bergen, “The Volksdeutsche of Eastern Europe and the Collapse of the Nazi Empire, 1944–1945,” in The Impact of Nazism: New Perspectives on the Third Reich and its Legacy, edited by Alan E. Steinweis and Daniel E. Rogers, 101–128 (Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press, 2003), 112.

Note 18: Susanna Toews, Trek to Freedom: The Escape of Two Sisters from South Russia during World War II, translated by Helen Megli (Winkler, MB: Heritage Valley, 1976), 31. Cf. also Łuczak, “Chronicle."

Note 19: Łuczak, “Chronicle,” 170.

Note 20:  Benjamin H. Unruh to Vereinigung Executive (“Zur Einigungsfrage”), January 26, 1944, 10, from Benjamin Unruh Collection, "Abraham Braun Correspondence," Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Wartheland: Mennonite Resettlers and Deportation of Poles,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), July 14, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/wartheland-mennonite-resettlers-and.html. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"They are useful to the state." An almost forgotten Prussian view of Mennonites, ca. 1780s-90s

In 1787 Mennonite interest for emigration was extremely strong outside the quasi independent City of Danzig in the Prussian annexed Marienwerder and Elbing regions. Even before the land scouts Johann Bartsch and Jacob Höppner had returned from Russia later that year, so many Mennonite exit applications had flooded offices that officials wrote Berlin in August 1787 for direction ( note 1a ). Initially officials did not see a problem: because Mennonites do not provide soldiers, the cantons lose nothing by their departure, and in fact benefit from the ten-percent tax imposed on financial assets leaving the state.  Ludwig von Baczko (1756-1823), Professor of History at the Artillery Academy in Königsberg, East Prussia, was the general editor of a series that included a travelogue through Prussia written by a certain Karl Ephraim Nanke. Nanke had no special love for Mennonites, but was generally balanced in his judgements and based his now almost forgotten account of Mennonites on perso...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flight from Flanders to Friesland

In the latter half of the sixteenth century Protestantism gradually spread throughout the northern Netherlands in the form of Calvinism—which had a direct impact on Anabaptists. When the Northern Provinces of the Netherlands led by the exiled Protestant Prince William of Orange went to war against Spain in 1568, persecution of Anabaptists in Catholic Flanders increased again. Long before the Protestant Northern Provinces would declare independence in 1581, the inquisition against Anabaptists in Bruges, for example, had achieved its goal. With the last two Anabaptist executions in the city in 1573, the once large and thriving Mennonite congregation was extinguished. Subsequently Mennonites lived in Bruges only on rare occasions, and when present, for only a short time, as for example the well-known art historian Karel van Mander in 1582 ( note 1 ). In the Northern Provinces Calvinism had become attractive theologically and politically. Not only was Christian resistance to tyrannical gov...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (Holodomor), 1932-1933

In 2008 the Canadian Parliament passed an act declaring the fourth Saturday in November as “Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (‘Holodomor’) Memorial Day” ( note 1 ). Southern Ukraine was arguably the worst affected region of the famine of 1932–33, where 30,000 to 40,000 Mennonites lived ( note 2 ). The number of famine-related deaths in Ukraine during this period are conservatively estimated at 3.5 million ( note 3 ). In the early 1930s Stalin feared growing “Ukrainian nationalism” and the possibility of “losing Ukraine” ( note 4 ). He was also suspicious of ethnic Poles and Germans—like Mennonites—in Ukraine, convinced of the “existence of an organized counter-revolutionary insurgent underground” in support of Ukrainian national independence ( note 5 ). Ukraine was targeted with a “lengthy schooling” designed to ruthlessly break the threat of Ukrainian nationalism and resistance, and this included Ukraine’s Mennonites (viewed simply as “Germans”). Various causes combined to bring on w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß";  note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Between Monarchs" a lot can happen (like revolt). A Mennonite "Accession" Prayer for the Monarch

It is surprising for many to learn that Russian Mennonites sang the Russian national anthem "God save the Tsar" in special worship services ... frequently! We have a "Mennonite prayer" and sermon sample for the accession of the monarch ( Thronbesteigung ) or its anniversary, with closing prayer-- and another Mennonite sampler of a coronation ( Krönung ) prayer, sermon and closing prayer ( note 1 ). After 70 years with one monarch, the manual is made for a time like this--try sharing it with your Canadian Mennonite pastor ;) Technically there is no “between” monarchs: “The Queen is Dead. Long live the King!” But there is much that happens or can happen before the coronation of the new monarch. Including revolt. Mennonites in Molotschna had hosted Tsar Alexander I shortly before his death in 1825. Upon his death in December, Alexander's brother and heir Constantine declined succession, and prior to the coronation of the next brother Nicholas, some 3,000 rebel (mos...
Post a Comment
Read more