Skip to main content

Wartheland: Mennonite Resettlers and Deportation of Poles

This post begins with an apologies and shame towards Polish readers.

Many Canadian and South American Mennonites have a family connection to the “Great Trek” story. 35,000 Mennonites were removed from Ukraine behind the retreating German military in the Fall of 1943 and early 1944. Nazi Germany’s goal: at war’s end Wartheland (annexed Poland) would have a majority racially-German population and remain part of greater Germany. Its Poles were disposed and tens of thousands deported; Jews were destroyed.

Reichsführer SS Himmler boasted to one resettler group: Poles know that “if you bother just one hair of a German family, you and all your Polish men in your village will lose your lives” (note 1). Catholic clergy had been largely executed or banished. Polish parish churches were repurposed--in some cases for Nazi Party offices (note 2). The official representative of Soviet Mennonites, Benjamin H. Unruh—who had met Heinrich Himmler for multiple meetings a year earlier—had requested some of these spaces be made available for Mennonites (note 3). The resettlement of Mennonites in close proximity to each other in Warthegau was also made possible by Unruh.

The use of public telephones by Poles was illegal, letters and postcards written in Polish were not processed, evening curfews for Poles were imposed, and travel even by bicycle from one village to another was forbidden without a special permit (note 4). The District of Dietfurt (where most of the Gnadenfeld Trek group was resettled, including my 6-year-old mother) published an interdiction against selling fruit and certain kinds of vegetables to Poles (note 5).

Poles were punished with two days in prison for not saluting a uniformed German (note 6). Elementary schooling for Polish children continued; but German was to be taught “only to the extent that it is necessary for the next generation of Polish workers, whom we need to fulfill the war and reconstruction tasks, to be able to make themselves understood in German; i.e., German vocabulary will be learned, but the language may not be spoken with grammatical correctness” (i.e., so as not to pass as a German; note 7).

One Mennonite resettler recalled:

"[T]he German authorities required us to wear swastikas …; the Polish residents had to wear a large 'P.' One day, as a seventeen year old, I went to the butcher shop. When I saw the long line-up, naturally I got behind the last person. … When the clerk at the counter noticed the swastika on my jacket, she motioned for me to come forward and be served. The local residents had to wait, just because they were Polish." (Note 8)

Food, clothing, medicine and schooling were provided for the resettlers at no cost by German authorities. Their identification papers stated clearly: “All administrative offices of the Party and State are requested to provide all necessary assistance to the holder of this document.”

By force German troops “ordered [Polish] residents and owners of the houses to move out and settle in barns. In our particular situation, the Poles were still moving their belongings out as we arrived to move in. None of us could do anything about that,” wrote one Mennonite afterwards (note 9). The dispossessed families were permitted to live with relatives on the edge of the village if they were useful for agricultural production. “The way the Poles were being treated was so foreign and incomprehensible to us ... This is of great embarrassment to us, because years ago we too were chased from our own homes and farms (note 10).

The involuntary resettlement of the majority Poles happened at a different pace in each Warthegau district. Eichenbrück—where some Mennonite women from the Gnadenfeld group were given employment—saw 6,946 new German arrivals in the first six months of 1944 with only four deportations, but with larger deportations planned for July (note 11); by August 1, 1,061 Poles had been deported (note 12).

In the District of Hohensalza, the chief medical officer reported that in April “2,817 Russian-Germans were settled in the district ... and were accommodated on the estates or in apartments that were partly vacated by Poles. Evacuation from Poland did not take place” (note 13). The Nazi Party’s Racial Political Office advised Himmler that approximately one million Poles had sufficient German blood to become assimilated for the Germanization of the extended living space (Lebensraum) (note 14). However the majority of Poles were to be relocated to reservations on the eastern edges of Poland.

Once in their new home, each "Black Sea German" household received a small amount of cash from the Party—60 RM plus 10 to 30 RM per child. The NSV Party organization distributed textile articles, footwear, woolen blankets, straw sacks, bed linen, beds, tables, chairs, armoires, and other basic household necessities required for a successful start (note 15). Some of these goods were expropriated from Poles or Jews.

Many of the Great Trek refugees arrived with lice, rickets and scabies, but also tuberculosis and trachoma. Provisional hospital rooms were set up in each refugee camp to isolate the sick, under the personal care of local doctors with multiple visits per week. Pharmaceuticals were available; very ill children were brought to city hospitals. Wards for Poles were cleared and cleaned for this purpose. Only two hospitals in Warthegau were open to Poles by 1943 (note 16).

It was an offence for Volksdeutsche to return items to Poles whose homes they now possessed and with whom they “often had more in common than they did with Germans from the Reich” (note 17).

Susanna Toews gratefully recalled that “[i]nspite of the fact that we occupied their homes, the Polish people were kind to us. However, we were forbidden to talk to them” (note 18). But from the perspective of Poles it was seen differently, Łuczak argues. The “machinery of occupation set in motion to fight against any sign of Polish life would not have operated so efficiently had it not enjoyed the everyday help of the great majority of Germans inhabiting the Warta Land. … Their attitude towards the discriminatory actions of the authorities against Poles was completely passive” (note 19).

In this context Mennonite leader Benjamin H. Unruh had a clear and new vision for church, and by June 1944 authorities were prepared to approve his articles of incorporation for the “Mennonite Congregational Church of German Nationality. ” With the assistance of legal counsel Gustav Reimer of the Heubuden, its constitution limited membership to those of “German nationality.” On principle Christians of Jewish or Slavic ethnic background would be excluded from this church. Unruh was full of optimism: “Today we are facing a new Reformation,” he wrote, and a united Mennonite Congregational Church had a role to play. It can “exemplify” to the larger Protestant “sister churches” what it means to be both “a true community of faith and a pioneer and shock troop (Stoßgruppe) for the whole … united in prayer, witness and work in the service of our dear German Volk!" (note 20). This image of a shock troop--language used for Hitler's paramilitary--was as close as Unruh and colleagues could come to see the church as a culturally critical embodiment of the Gospel.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Map of Reichsgau Wartheland from https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landkreis_Dietfurt_(Wartheland)#/media/Datei:Wartheland.png. For a detailed map of Altburgund, cf. https://kpbc.umk.pl/dlibra/publication/167966/edition/170631/content; and Rolf Jehke, Territoriale Veränderungen in Deutschland und deutsch verwalteten Gebieten 1874 – 1945 (online), http://territorial.de/wart/wart.htm.

Note 1: In Valdis O. Lumans, Hitler’s Auxiliaries: The Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle and the German National Minorities of Europe, 1933–1945 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1993), 197.

Note 2: Cf. the discussion around a baroque church in Protection of Monuments, March 22, 1941, NAC 53/299/0, series 7.2, file 2970, 1, no. 5, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/jednostka/-/jednostka/1049629. Cf. also “Trial of Gauleiter Artur Greiser, Case No. 74, June 21–July 7, 1946,” Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 13 at 70. Supreme National Tribunal of Poland, July 7, 1946, http://www.worldcourts.com/imt/eng/decisions/1946.07.07_Poland_v_Greiser.pdf. The closure of Catholic churches was noted by contemporary Jacob A. Neufeld without comment (Path of Thorns: Soviet Mennonite Life under Communist and Nazi Rule, edited by H. L. Dyck, translated by H. L. Dyck and S. Dyck (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014), 300.

Note 3: Unruh reflects on the Himmler visit at various points to denominational colleagues. See also “Notizen,” Box 2, file 7, 1919-1957, Unruh Collection, Weierhof. On Unruh's proposal for the new Mennonite church/conference of congregations in Warthegau, cf. Benjamin Unruh to Peter Bergmann, Letter, June 6, 1944, 2. From Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof, Benjamin Unruh Collection, folder “Correspondence with Abraham Braun, 1930, 1940, 1944–45.” Also Horst Gerlach, “Mennonites, the Molotschna, and the Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle in the Second World War,” translated by John D. Thiesen, Mennonite Life 41, no. 3 (1986), 4–9; 8, https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1986sep.pdf. On Unruh see my published essay, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/bitstream/handle/20.500.12730/1571/Neufeldt-Fast_Arnold_2022a.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Note 4: Doc. 4, 15, 16 & 17, in Czesław Łuczak, “Chronicle: Records on the Situation of Poles in the Warte Land,” Instytut Zachodni (Poznań), Western Affairs 8, no. 1 (1967), 172, 180–182.

Note 5: Doc. 18, in Łuczak, “Chronicle,” 182.

Note 6: Doc. 3 & Doc. 22, in Łuczak, “Chronicle,” 172; 189.

Note 7: Greiser, Circular on the use of the Polish language by Poles, February 23, 1943, February 23, 1943, p. 2. From: Instytut Zachodni Poznań, https://www.iz.poznan.pl/archiwum/zasob/.

Note 8: Jacob Braun, The Long Road to Freedom (Winnipeg, MB: Word Alive, 2011), 82.

Note 9: J. Braun, The Long Road to Freedom, 80; cf. also A. A. Töws, ed., Mennonitische Märtyrer der jüngsten Vergangenheit und der Gegenwart, vol. 2: Der große Leidensweg (North Clearbrook, BC: Self-published, 1954), 381.

Note 10: Jacob A. Neufeld, Tiefenwege. Erfahrungen und Erlebnisse von Russland-Mennoniten in zwei Jahrzehnten bis 1949 (Virgil, ON: Niagara, 1958), 179f.

Note 11: July 4, 1944, State Health Office Eichenbrück Report, Transport Niemców znad Morza Czarnego na teren Kraju Warty (Transport of Germans from the Black Sea to the Wartheland; from NAC, 53/299/0, series 2.2, file 1979, 224, no. 232, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/jednostka/-/jednostka/1049368. Cf. J. Neufeld, Path of Thorns, 299; 325.

Note 12: August 4, 1944, State Health Office Eichenbrück Report, Transport 318, no. 327.

Note 13: May 5, 1944, State Health Office Hohensalza Report, Transport 15, no. 19.

Note 14: Lumans, Himmler’s Auxiliaries, 185.

Note 15: January 25, 1944, Governor for Reich Gau Wartheland, Unterbringung, 12–15, no. 16–19; also March 13, 1944, Reich Governor for the Reich Gau Wartheland, Unterbringung, 161, no. 180. From: Unterbringung der Schwarzmeerdeutsche. Der Reichsstatthalter im Reichsgau Wartheland Posen (GK 62) / Namiestnik Rzeszy w Okręgu Kraju Warty. From NAC, 53/299/0, series 2.2, file 1978, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/zespol/-/zespol/13390.

Note 16: Transport, no. 136. Also Tuberkulosenschutz, September 16, 1943, NAC 53/299/0, series 2.5, file 2215: 301, no. 293, https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/jednostka/-/jednostka/1049717

Note 17: Doris Bergen, “The Volksdeutsche of Eastern Europe and the Collapse of the Nazi Empire, 1944–1945,” in The Impact of Nazism: New Perspectives on the Third Reich and its Legacy, edited by Alan E. Steinweis and Daniel E. Rogers, 101–128 (Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press, 2003), 112.

Note 18: Susanna Toews, Trek to Freedom: The Escape of Two Sisters from South Russia during World War II, translated by Helen Megli (Winkler, MB: Heritage Valley, 1976), 31. Cf. also Łuczak, “Chronicle."

Note 19: Łuczak, “Chronicle,” 170.

Note 20:  Benjamin H. Unruh to Vereinigung Executive (“Zur Einigungsfrage”), January 26, 1944, 10, from Benjamin Unruh Collection, "Abraham Braun Correspondence," Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Wartheland: Mennonite Resettlers and Deportation of Poles,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), July 14, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/wartheland-mennonite-resettlers-and.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...

1921: Formation of the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine”

Famine was imminent; unprecedented drought; taxes and requisitions exceeded what was harvested; some villages had no horses; extortion and arrests were widespread; many men were disenfranchised and barred from village affairs (see note 1 ). Lenin responded with the 1921 “New Economic Policy” (NEP), which allowed for a degree of market flexibility within the context of socialism to ward off complete economic collapse. A fixed-tax was imposed, grain quotas were eased, farmers were allowed a small amount of land and could sell excess produce at free-market prices after taxes had been paid. Much was in the air. In secret talks, Soviet Trade Commissar Leonid Krasin told the head of the Eastern Section in the German Foreign Office, Gustav Behrendt, that the USSR was “prepared—just like Catherine the Great of old—to call hundreds of thousands of German colonists into the land and transfer them to large, closed complexes for settlement,” especially in Turkestan and the North Caucasus, be...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...

Molotschna Elder Heinrich Dirks and tensions with Mennonite Brethren

Russian Mennonites were not always kind to each other—and nowhere is this seen better than in the tensions between “old” Mennonites and the “separatist” Mennonite Brethren, who had their beginnings in Gnadenfeld, Molotschna in 1860. Heinrich Dirks (1842-1915) was the first Russian Mennonite overseas missionary and later long-time Gnadenfeld, Molotschna ( note 1 ). Everything about Dirks’ life suggests that he would have joined the Brethren in 1860. He too was influenced by the "powerful and gripping” conversionist ministry of Eduard Wüst in his youth. Dirks was a young adult in the Gnadenfeld congregation in South Russia where the Mennonite Brethren /separatist movement began. Shortly thereafter, he was trained in the German pietist Barmen Mission School (1863-67), and famously travelled to Sumatra (Indonesia) where he started a mission outpost and school. The Mennonite Brethren too would later connect the global mission imperative with the impending return of Christ as did Dirk...

When Mennonite Agencies withdraw support from star player: Benjamin Unruh, 1938

In 1938 Mennonite Central Committee took the decision to significantly reduce their support of Benjamin Unruh’s work in Germany as of August 1, and Dutch Mennonites announced the same effective January 1, 1939. What to do? Ask the Nazi Party and government agencies to make up the difference ( note 1 )! On December 3, 1938, Unruh made the following pitch: “Germany generously and magnanimously helped our [Mennonite] organizations, on my intercession, to overcome the manifold difficulties connected with such a large movement of people [beginning 1923] in such critical times. ... The fact that finally all Mennonite synodal and national associations formally appointed me as their representative in the field of Russian-German welfare (Fürsorge), had its deeper reason especially in the success of my activity in Germany. … You see that I stand in the center of the global Mennonite [relief] work. However, I have always done this as a German man and not only as a representative of my denominat...