Skip to main content

Learning how to Worship again as Germans: Molotschna 1941

In June 2023 St. Catharines Mennonites held their last German worship service. It is a congregation that has been shaped by German language and culture for decades. St. Catharines United Mennonite would eventually include many post-war immigrants, and by 1971 its Saturday morning German School enrolled 118 students--including me. German was the language in which I too first experienced worship (note 1).

But for the post-war immigrants born under Stalin or earlier, the journey to faith through the Nazi era was much more complex. Young adults came with a blank slate, and the older ones had to learn how to worship again--but as Germans. Much of their worship and simple theology (without leaders) had to be unlearnt after the war. Below I try to piece together a part of that faith and cultural journey.

With German occupation of Ukraine in Fall 1941, the public celebration of Christmas returned to the Molotschna for the first time in about a decade. Practices for a children’s program “such as we used to have” began early, with the Christmas story, poems and carols, according to Susanna Toews (note 2).

A family friend from Großweide remembered it as a “first Christmas without fear”. There were no pine, fir or spruce trees in the Molotschna, so her family cut a cherry tree branch in the form of a Christmas tree and filled it out with green cedar branches. Tree decorations were creatively crafted from straw and the foil papers from German cigarette packages. Candles too were created. The primary school was prepared for a community Christmas service and was also used for worship. There were almost no gifts that could be purchased, nor did people have money that was of any value (note 3).

One older Pastwa woman who had been wealthy before the revolution still had some colourful fabric pieces that she now gave to the children for neckties (boys) and bags (girls). In most homes cookies were baked and candy cooked from syrup and potato flour; after the service all children received a small bag of cookies: “Words can hardly express what we felt that Christmas” (note 4).

My mother was four years old at the time, and recalls being awakened by her two older sisters and told to peak out through the door. But instead of seeing Santa Claus—the Weihnachtsmann—she only saw her mother and Aunt Tina placing Christmas goodies on the children’s plates! My mother’s cousin Marga Bräul—who had been in teachers college in Odessa—was able to acquire a porcelain doll in Odessa for my mother’s sister Lenchen (some 25,000 Jews were murdered in Odessa in October 1941; it is hard not to assume that the doll came from one of those families).

The German soldiers in the village had three or four free days and were grateful to be amongst other Germans for Christmas (note 5).

Local women formed a special choir to practice Christmas carols; at the practices, German S.S. officers insisted that the choir learn the anthem of the Third Reich (“Siehst du im Osten das Morgenrot”), and that certain formulations in the carol “Silent Night” be left out and replaced with another text (note 6).

Already at their Thanksgiving service there was a sense that things were different.

“The hymns that were sung were foreign to us; even the manner of speaking we found somewhat strange. But it was very nice, we thought, for we hadn’t been in a worship service for more than ten years.” (Note 7)

In the village of Paulsheim my mother’s cousin Nellie remembered worship in homes led by women and a choir for teenage girls; she had never been in a choir—it was all so new (note 8). Most remaining church buildings were in serious disrepair. Gnadenfeld’s old church building however could be cleaned and reopened. Because there were only two older ministers in the Molotschna, women or other lay people began to take turns reading scripture and a devotional on Sunday from a published collection (note 9).

The S.S. commander who addressed the Christmas worshipers in Gnadenfeld assured them that their trials and sufferings had now come to an end. “We have delivered you. For this you can be grateful to our great leader, Adolf Hitler. He alone deserves your thanks," as Susanna Toews recalled his words. However she adds some years later: "We knew quite well, that the praise was due to our great God. In fact, we were surprised that the speaker made no mention of God” (note 10).

In another memoir the author writes: “We noticed that the chaplain spoke only of God and never mentioned Jesus. Nevertheless, we hoped for the best” (note 11).

They would be disappointed, however.

The new German Bible paraphrase, The Message of God (Die Botschaft Gottes), was a de-Judaized version of the New Testament released in 1940 without the Old Testament by the "Institute for the Study and Eradication of Jewish Influence on German Church Life." The translation removed passages such as Jesus’ statement that “salvation is from the Jews” (John 4:22), for example (note 12). The German Reich hymnal had also been released that year, and it too was purged of “Judaisms,” including Hebrew words such as “Hallelujah,” “Amen,” “Messiah,” and “Hosanna,” and all references to Jerusalem and Zion (note 13).

It is unclear how many copies of the Bible and hymnal were distributed to the ethnic German villages in occupied Ukraine or how soon—but they were likely used by chaplains (note 14). Both documents were ideologically compliant with Nazi doctrine. The pro-Nazi "German Christians" movement sought to challenge Jesus' Jewishness, and resurrect a very old anti-Semitic argument—that Jesus is not Jewish but "Aryan."

Curiously Mennonites in Germany had also found this "thesis" interesting to consider (note 15). In 1937, the young adult periodical Mennonitische Jugendwarte published a longer essay by non-Mennonite Eduard Putz, in which Putz outlined and seriously considered the argument that Jesus was not Jewish, but “Aryan … and related to us by blood”; that “it was his Nordic blood that rose up in him against all that is Jewish. That’s why he grabbed for the whip to chase the Jews out of the temple,” and why he called them “children of the devil.” His was a "racial battle, of an Aryan soul and a Jewish racial soul,” and his death an “Aryan tragedy,” his battle an “anti-Semitic battle” (note 16).

The strongest Mennonite theologian of the era in Germany was Benjamin H. Unruh, who considered the argument as well. Unruh was a Russian Mennonite barred from USSR since 1921, and highly influential not only in all German Mennonite circles, but especially too with Russian Mennonites in South America and in Canada whom he had shepherded out of the USSR.

But rather than shut down the argument in the Jugendwarte, Unruh played with the idea and agreed that "of course Indo-Germanic blood" made its way to Galilee, and at another level too, of course Jesus did not only have Jewish blood in his veins as a descendant of Ruth, and yes, the Bible takes blood and race very, very seriously, etc., etc. (note 17).

Two-and-a-half years later, the SS director of the teacher training institute at Halbstadt/Prischib and acquaintance of Unruh, Karl Götz, advised his SS superiors that Mennonite faith and worship was evolving as hoped.

“For the Russian Mennonites … the Lord God (Herrgott) or the divine as such remained as most essential to their religious feeling. For the most part, all Christian-dogmatic aspects have faded. … They are groping for religious models again. Understandably, they also come upon dogmatic-confessional matters on occasion. But with astute guidance regarding worldview, the Mennonites in particular—but also the rest of the German Russians—will be led away from dogmatic-confessional matters to a clear and thoroughly German religiosity (Gottgläubigkeit). Their desire is for the divine, for awe before the Almighty, the inconceivable, the sublime. Mennonite leaders are now working to lead the world of Mennonitism (Mennonitentum) toward this German god-believing, religious attitude.” (Note 18)

Nazi leadership assumed that any residual Mennonite adherence to religious doctrine was a “temporary phase” that in time will be replaced by Germanic völkisch ethnic values.

But the Mennonites in Ukraine knew nothing of this agenda.

However after the Christmas service in Gnadenfeld in 1941 members of the S.S. invited the youth to the school to dance into the night. Despite years of no church, the young Mennonite women knew their tradition well enough though to tell the German men: “We do not like it” (note 19)!

Eduard Reimer, a Mennonite member of the First Ethnic German Cavalry Squadron in 1942 recalled: “[O]n weekends we could frequently ride home to our villages and attend worship services. Our enthusiasm for everything German was so great that at the end of the service we uniformed men (I had no civilian clothing) with raised right arm (German greeting) sang the German national anthem (Deutschlandlied and Horst Wessel Lied). The congregation sang with us” (note 20).

What was the impact of that larger, twisted story of learning, unlearning and relearning the heart and purpose of worship? I am too close to those experiences to see clearly. But I know that learning, unlearning and relearning the patterns and themes of worship takes time. There are many important "cautions" from that “German experience” for other eras and generations. But at the same time, it is sad for me to hear that the German services have ended in St. Catharines; inevitably there will be much cultural richness in worship and heritage that will be lost as well.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: See Maria H. Klassen, “Last German Service Held in St. Catharines United Mennonite,” Canadian Mennonite 27, no. 14D (July 10, 2023), https://canadianmennonite.org/stories/last-german-service-held-st-catharines-united-mennonite. On German School statistics, cf. Isbrand Friesen, “The Saturday German School,” in St. Catharines United Mennonite Church: 50th Anniversary, 1945–1995, 142–144 (St. Catharines, ON. Self-published, 1995), 143.I have reflected on my experience in this congregation in a previous post (forthcoming).

Note 2: Susanna Toews, Trek to Freedom: The Escape of Two Sisters from South Russia during World War II, translated by Helen Megli (Winkler, MB: Heritage Valley, 1976), 19.

Note 3: Katharina Esau, “So bleibt es nicht. Erinnerungen aus meiner Kindheit [bis 1945],” 2002. In my possession--ANF.

Note 4: Katie Friesen, Into the Unknown (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1986), 46.

Note 5: Esau, “So bleibt es nicht. Erinnerungen.”

Note 6: G. Lohrenz, Lose Blätter III (Winnipeg, MB: Self-published, 1976), 131.

Note 7: Lohrenz, Lose Blätter III, 130.

Note 8: Nellie Bräul Epp, interview with the author, 2017; Victor Janzen of Osterwick, Chortitza also recalls first worship services in their home and then later in the schools (From the Dniepr to the Paraguay River [Winnipeg, MB: Self-published, 1995], 34, 37).

Note 9: In the first year two older ministers, Abram Boldt and Heinrich Penner, served the Gnadenfeld and Konteniusfeld congregations and baptized only 24 people, according to Harry Loewen, ed., Road to Freedom: Mennonites Escape the Land of Suffering (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2000) 77. Cf. also S. Toews, Trek to Freedom, 19.

Note 10: S. Toews, Trek to Freedom, 19.

Note 11: Lohrenz, Lose Blätter III, 130. Cf. Doris Bergen, “Between God and Hitler: German Military Chaplains and the Crimes of the Third Reich,” in In God’s Name: Genocide and Religion in the Twentieth Century, edited by Omer Barkov and Phyllis Mack, 123–138 (New York: Berghahn, 2001), 129.

Note 12: Die Botschaft Gottes, Institut zur Erforschung des jüdischen Einflusses auf das deutsche kirchliche Leben (Weimar: Deutsche Christen, 1940), https://archive.org/details/die-botschaft-gottes/mode/2up. Cf. also the related /helpful Wikipedia entry: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Botschaft_Gottes.

Note 13: Großer Gott wir loben dich (Weimar: Verlag für deutschchristliches Schriftum, 1941), https://digisam.ub.uni-giessen.de/urn/urn:nbn:de:hebis:26-digisam-123404. See the 1942 critical English-language review by Millar Patrick, “The New Nazi Hymn Book,” Bulletin of the Hymn Society of Great Britain, no. 20 (July 1942), 20, https://hymnsocietygbi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/T05-The-New-Nazi-Hymn-Book.pdf. Cf. also Susannah Heschel, The Aryan Jesus: Christian Theologians and the Bible in Nazi Germany (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008), 119-122, https://archive.org/details/aryanjesuschrist0000hesc/page/118/mode/2up (some errors in hymn titles, section names and page numbers).

Note 14: Cf. Bergen, “Between God and Hitler,” 129; also Susannah Heschel, “Nazifying Christian Theology: Walter Grundmann and the Institute for the Study and Eradication of Jewish Influence on German Church Life,” Church History 63, no. 4 (December 1994), 587–605; 595.

Note 15: Cf. James Irwin Lichti, Houses on the Sand? Pacifist Denominations in Nazi Germany (New York: Peter Lang, 2008), ch. 5.

Note 16: Eduard Putz, “Der Kampf Jesu wider die Juden,” Mennonitische Jugendwarte 17, no. 2 (April 1937), 18-34. https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Jugendwarte/DSCF9318.JPG.

Note 17: Benjamin H. Unruh, "Blut und Rasse im A.T. [Alten Testament]," Gemeindeblatt der Mennoniten 69, no. 20 (October 1, 1938) 90-91. https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Gemeindeblatt%20der%20Mennoniten/1933-1941/DSCF7785.JPGOn Unruh see my published essay, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/bitstream/handle/20.500.12730/1571/Neufeldt-Fast_Arnold_2022a.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Note 18: Karl Götz, Das Schwarzmeerdeutschtum: Die Mennoniten (Posen: NS-Druck Wartheland, 1944), 11f., Bundesarchiv 187/267a, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1944, or https://chortitza.org/pdf/0v772.pdf. On Götz and the booklet (in translation), see Benjamin Goossen, “‘A Small World Power’: How the Nazi Regime Viewed Mennonites,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 92, no. 2 (2018), 173–206, https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/goossen/files/goossen_a_small_world_power_2018.pdf.

Note 19: S. Toews, Trek to Freedom, 19.

Note 20: Eduard Reimer, Memoir (n.d.), 68, from Gerhard Lohrenz Fonds, 60, no. 63, vol. 3333, Mennonite Heritage Archives, Winnipeg, MB. Compare Eduard Allert [pseud.], “The Lost Generation,” in The Lost Generation and other Stories, edited by Gerhard Lohrenz, 9–128 (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1982), 55.

---
To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Learning to Worship again as Germans: Molotschna 1941,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), July 14, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/learning-how-to-worship-again-as.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß";  note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...