Skip to main content

Learning how to Worship again as Germans: Molotschna 1941

In June 2023 St. Catharines Mennonites held their last German worship service. It is a congregation that has been shaped by German language and culture for decades. St. Catharines United Mennonite would eventually include many post-war immigrants, and by 1971 its Saturday morning German School enrolled 118 students--including me. German was the language in which I too first experienced worship (note 1).

But for the post-war immigrants born under Stalin or earlier, the journey to faith through the Nazi era was much more complex. Young adults came with a blank slate, and the older ones had to learn how to worship again--but as Germans. Much of their worship and simple theology (without leaders) had to be unlearnt after the war. Below I try to piece together a part of that faith and cultural journey.

With German occupation of Ukraine in Fall 1941, the public celebration of Christmas returned to the Molotschna for the first time in about a decade. Practices for a children’s program “such as we used to have” began early, with the Christmas story, poems and carols, according to Susanna Toews (note 2).

A family friend from Großweide remembered it as a “first Christmas without fear”. There were no pine, fir or spruce trees in the Molotschna, so her family cut a cherry tree branch in the form of a Christmas tree and filled it out with green cedar branches. Tree decorations were creatively crafted from straw and the foil papers from German cigarette packages. Candles too were created. The primary school was prepared for a community Christmas service and was also used for worship. There were almost no gifts that could be purchased, nor did people have money that was of any value (note 3).

One older Pastwa woman who had been wealthy before the revolution still had some colourful fabric pieces that she now gave to the children for neckties (boys) and bags (girls). In most homes cookies were baked and candy cooked from syrup and potato flour; after the service all children received a small bag of cookies: “Words can hardly express what we felt that Christmas” (note 4).

My mother was four years old at the time, and recalls being awakened by her two older sisters and told to peak out through the door. But instead of seeing Santa Claus—the Weihnachtsmann—she only saw her mother and Aunt Tina placing Christmas goodies on the children’s plates! My mother’s cousin Marga Bräul—who had been in teachers college in Odessa—was able to acquire a porcelain doll in Odessa for my mother’s sister Lenchen (some 25,000 Jews were murdered in Odessa in October 1941; it is hard not to assume that the doll came from one of those families).

The German soldiers in the village had three or four free days and were grateful to be amongst other Germans for Christmas (note 5).

Local women formed a special choir to practice Christmas carols; at the practices, German S.S. officers insisted that the choir learn the anthem of the Third Reich (“Siehst du im Osten das Morgenrot”), and that certain formulations in the carol “Silent Night” be left out and replaced with another text (note 6).

Already at their Thanksgiving service there was a sense that things were different.

“The hymns that were sung were foreign to us; even the manner of speaking we found somewhat strange. But it was very nice, we thought, for we hadn’t been in a worship service for more than ten years.” (Note 7)

In the village of Paulsheim my mother’s cousin Nellie remembered worship in homes led by women and a choir for teenage girls; she had never been in a choir—it was all so new (note 8). Most remaining church buildings were in serious disrepair. Gnadenfeld’s old church building however could be cleaned and reopened. Because there were only two older ministers in the Molotschna, women or other lay people began to take turns reading scripture and a devotional on Sunday from a published collection (note 9).

The S.S. commander who addressed the Christmas worshipers in Gnadenfeld assured them that their trials and sufferings had now come to an end. “We have delivered you. For this you can be grateful to our great leader, Adolf Hitler. He alone deserves your thanks," as Susanna Toews recalled his words. However she adds some years later: "We knew quite well, that the praise was due to our great God. In fact, we were surprised that the speaker made no mention of God” (note 10).

In another memoir the author writes: “We noticed that the chaplain spoke only of God and never mentioned Jesus. Nevertheless, we hoped for the best” (note 11).

They would be disappointed, however.

The new German Bible paraphrase, The Message of God (Die Botschaft Gottes), was a de-Judaized version of the New Testament released in 1940 without the Old Testament by the "Institute for the Study and Eradication of Jewish Influence on German Church Life." The translation removed passages such as Jesus’ statement that “salvation is from the Jews” (John 4:22), for example (note 12). The German Reich hymnal had also been released that year, and it too was purged of “Judaisms,” including Hebrew words such as “Hallelujah,” “Amen,” “Messiah,” and “Hosanna,” and all references to Jerusalem and Zion (note 13).

It is unclear how many copies of the Bible and hymnal were distributed to the ethnic German villages in occupied Ukraine or how soon—but they were likely used by chaplains (note 14). Both documents were ideologically compliant with Nazi doctrine. The pro-Nazi "German Christians" movement sought to challenge Jesus' Jewishness, and resurrect a very old anti-Semitic argument—that Jesus is not Jewish but "Aryan."

Curiously Mennonites in Germany had also found this "thesis" interesting to consider (note 15). In 1937, the young adult periodical Mennonitische Jugendwarte published a longer essay by non-Mennonite Eduard Putz, in which Putz outlined and seriously considered the argument that Jesus was not Jewish, but “Aryan … and related to us by blood”; that “it was his Nordic blood that rose up in him against all that is Jewish. That’s why he grabbed for the whip to chase the Jews out of the temple,” and why he called them “children of the devil.” His was a "racial battle, of an Aryan soul and a Jewish racial soul,” and his death an “Aryan tragedy,” his battle an “anti-Semitic battle” (note 16).

The strongest Mennonite theologian of the era in Germany was Benjamin H. Unruh, who considered the argument as well. Unruh was a Russian Mennonite barred from USSR since 1921, and highly influential not only in all German Mennonite circles, but especially too with Russian Mennonites in South America and in Canada whom he had shepherded out of the USSR.

But rather than shut down the argument in the Jugendwarte, Unruh played with the idea and agreed that "of course Indo-Germanic blood" made its way to Galilee, and at another level too, of course Jesus did not only have Jewish blood in his veins as a descendant of Ruth, and yes, the Bible takes blood and race very, very seriously, etc., etc. (note 17).

Two-and-a-half years later, the SS director of the teacher training institute at Halbstadt/Prischib and acquaintance of Unruh, Karl Götz, advised his SS superiors that Mennonite faith and worship was evolving as hoped.

“For the Russian Mennonites … the Lord God (Herrgott) or the divine as such remained as most essential to their religious feeling. For the most part, all Christian-dogmatic aspects have faded. … They are groping for religious models again. Understandably, they also come upon dogmatic-confessional matters on occasion. But with astute guidance regarding worldview, the Mennonites in particular—but also the rest of the German Russians—will be led away from dogmatic-confessional matters to a clear and thoroughly German religiosity (Gottgläubigkeit). Their desire is for the divine, for awe before the Almighty, the inconceivable, the sublime. Mennonite leaders are now working to lead the world of Mennonitism (Mennonitentum) toward this German god-believing, religious attitude.” (Note 18)

Nazi leadership assumed that any residual Mennonite adherence to religious doctrine was a “temporary phase” that in time will be replaced by Germanic völkisch ethnic values.

But the Mennonites in Ukraine knew nothing of this agenda.

However after the Christmas service in Gnadenfeld in 1941 members of the S.S. invited the youth to the school to dance into the night. Despite years of no church, the young Mennonite women knew their tradition well enough though to tell the German men: “We do not like it” (note 19)!

Eduard Reimer, a Mennonite member of the First Ethnic German Cavalry Squadron in 1942 recalled: “[O]n weekends we could frequently ride home to our villages and attend worship services. Our enthusiasm for everything German was so great that at the end of the service we uniformed men (I had no civilian clothing) with raised right arm (German greeting) sang the German national anthem (Deutschlandlied and Horst Wessel Lied). The congregation sang with us” (note 20).

What was the impact of that larger, twisted story of learning, unlearning and relearning the heart and purpose of worship? I am too close to those experiences to see clearly. But I know that learning, unlearning and relearning the patterns and themes of worship takes time. There are many important "cautions" from that “German experience” for other eras and generations. But at the same time, it is sad for me to hear that the German services have ended in St. Catharines; inevitably there will be much cultural richness in worship and heritage that will be lost as well.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: See Maria H. Klassen, “Last German Service Held in St. Catharines United Mennonite,” Canadian Mennonite 27, no. 14D (July 10, 2023), https://canadianmennonite.org/stories/last-german-service-held-st-catharines-united-mennonite. On German School statistics, cf. Isbrand Friesen, “The Saturday German School,” in St. Catharines United Mennonite Church: 50th Anniversary, 1945–1995, 142–144 (St. Catharines, ON. Self-published, 1995), 143.I have reflected on my experience in this congregation in a previous post (forthcoming).

Note 2: Susanna Toews, Trek to Freedom: The Escape of Two Sisters from South Russia during World War II, translated by Helen Megli (Winkler, MB: Heritage Valley, 1976), 19.

Note 3: Katharina Esau, “So bleibt es nicht. Erinnerungen aus meiner Kindheit [bis 1945],” 2002. In my possession--ANF.

Note 4: Katie Friesen, Into the Unknown (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1986), 46.

Note 5: Esau, “So bleibt es nicht. Erinnerungen.”

Note 6: G. Lohrenz, Lose Blätter III (Winnipeg, MB: Self-published, 1976), 131.

Note 7: Lohrenz, Lose Blätter III, 130.

Note 8: Nellie Bräul Epp, interview with the author, 2017; Victor Janzen of Osterwick, Chortitza also recalls first worship services in their home and then later in the schools (From the Dniepr to the Paraguay River [Winnipeg, MB: Self-published, 1995], 34, 37).

Note 9: In the first year two older ministers, Abram Boldt and Heinrich Penner, served the Gnadenfeld and Konteniusfeld congregations and baptized only 24 people, according to Harry Loewen, ed., Road to Freedom: Mennonites Escape the Land of Suffering (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2000) 77. Cf. also S. Toews, Trek to Freedom, 19.

Note 10: S. Toews, Trek to Freedom, 19.

Note 11: Lohrenz, Lose Blätter III, 130. Cf. Doris Bergen, “Between God and Hitler: German Military Chaplains and the Crimes of the Third Reich,” in In God’s Name: Genocide and Religion in the Twentieth Century, edited by Omer Barkov and Phyllis Mack, 123–138 (New York: Berghahn, 2001), 129.

Note 12: Die Botschaft Gottes, Institut zur Erforschung des jüdischen Einflusses auf das deutsche kirchliche Leben (Weimar: Deutsche Christen, 1940), https://archive.org/details/die-botschaft-gottes/mode/2up. Cf. also the related /helpful Wikipedia entry: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Botschaft_Gottes.

Note 13: Großer Gott wir loben dich (Weimar: Verlag für deutschchristliches Schriftum, 1941), https://digisam.ub.uni-giessen.de/urn/urn:nbn:de:hebis:26-digisam-123404. See the 1942 critical English-language review by Millar Patrick, “The New Nazi Hymn Book,” Bulletin of the Hymn Society of Great Britain, no. 20 (July 1942), 20, https://hymnsocietygbi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/T05-The-New-Nazi-Hymn-Book.pdf. Cf. also Susannah Heschel, The Aryan Jesus: Christian Theologians and the Bible in Nazi Germany (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008), 119-122, https://archive.org/details/aryanjesuschrist0000hesc/page/118/mode/2up (some errors in hymn titles, section names and page numbers).

Note 14: Cf. Bergen, “Between God and Hitler,” 129; also Susannah Heschel, “Nazifying Christian Theology: Walter Grundmann and the Institute for the Study and Eradication of Jewish Influence on German Church Life,” Church History 63, no. 4 (December 1994), 587–605; 595.

Note 15: Cf. James Irwin Lichti, Houses on the Sand? Pacifist Denominations in Nazi Germany (New York: Peter Lang, 2008), ch. 5.

Note 16: Eduard Putz, “Der Kampf Jesu wider die Juden,” Mennonitische Jugendwarte 17, no. 2 (April 1937), 18-34. https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Jugendwarte/DSCF9318.JPG.

Note 17: Benjamin H. Unruh, "Blut und Rasse im A.T. [Alten Testament]," Gemeindeblatt der Mennoniten 69, no. 20 (October 1, 1938) 90-91. https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Gemeindeblatt%20der%20Mennoniten/1933-1941/DSCF7785.JPGOn Unruh see my published essay, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/bitstream/handle/20.500.12730/1571/Neufeldt-Fast_Arnold_2022a.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Note 18: Karl Götz, Das Schwarzmeerdeutschtum: Die Mennoniten (Posen: NS-Druck Wartheland, 1944), 11f., Bundesarchiv 187/267a, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1944, or https://chortitza.org/pdf/0v772.pdf. On Götz and the booklet (in translation), see Benjamin Goossen, “‘A Small World Power’: How the Nazi Regime Viewed Mennonites,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 92, no. 2 (2018), 173–206, https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/goossen/files/goossen_a_small_world_power_2018.pdf.

Note 19: S. Toews, Trek to Freedom, 19.

Note 20: Eduard Reimer, Memoir (n.d.), 68, from Gerhard Lohrenz Fonds, 60, no. 63, vol. 3333, Mennonite Heritage Archives, Winnipeg, MB. Compare Eduard Allert [pseud.], “The Lost Generation,” in The Lost Generation and other Stories, edited by Gerhard Lohrenz, 9–128 (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1982), 55.

---
To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Learning to Worship again as Germans: Molotschna 1941,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), July 14, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/learning-how-to-worship-again-as.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C