Skip to main content

Last Days of Mennonite Life on the Molotschna, September 1943

The Molotschna Mennonite Colony was established in 1803; 140 years later its villages were evacuated by retreating German armies. A map of the larger German operation of 1943 and the various "Trecks" is attached. The tens of thousands of evacuees included some 35,000 Mennonites. Nazi Germany had utterly failed Ukrainians, but continued to have plans for their "ethnic Germans" in the east.


On Sept. 8, 1943, the Red Army successfully took Donetsk (Stalino), 230 km east of Molotschna. The next day, S.S. administrators gave orders that every Molotschna family should load one wagon with their possessions and prepare for an orderly evacuation.

Hitler was intent on holding Crimea, and sought to set up a defensive line from Zaporizhzhia to Melitopol and south to the Sea of Azov. Evacuation plans east of this line were in place since late June—initially to be resettled “somewhere” west of the Dnieper; on Aug. 17 first steps were taken to move 8,000 hospital beds west of the Dnieper (note 1).

The day after the fall of Donetsk on Sept 8 (note 2), work on Molotschna fields ceased as everyone prepared for evacuation. The Ethnic German Cavalry confiscated horses and wagons from neighbouring villages so that all departing families would have adequate transportation.


A-frame shelters had to be built over the rear of the wagons. Some took a cow; remaining pigs, sheep and chickens were butchered and pickled. As much baking as possible was also done; Zwieback, Mennonite buns, were toasted. Some remember how their mothers took sacks of dried cherries, apples, pears, and plums as well. Clothes and bedding were washed and packed together with small implements and kitchenware.


The villages of Marienthal (my mother's village), Schardau and Pordenau and 12 others were part of the “Gnadenfeld Support District” (Betreuungs-Bezirk). Villages were led by mayors and every group of 10 wagons had a captain. The Gnadenfeld District had ca. 2,000 wagons, which if lined up stretched 20 km. (note 3).

Sept. 12–16: Late into the night the Marienthalers travelled to Alexanderkrone—already fully occupied—and then to Kleefeld just as rains began; here evacuees slept in an old windowless school or on wagons (note 4). Katie Friesen recalls:

“Our departure that morning was heart-breaking and depressing. The rain and the accompanying dreariness reflected our own sadness about having to leave our home. It also meant that the roads that we were to travel would be soft and difficult to traverse. German troops were everywhere in our village anxiously awaiting our departure… . Their very presence emphasized the urgency to evacuate with haste as the Germans were rapidly retreating.” (Note 5)

Those who refused to leave “were threatened to be shot, and this actually happened later as well.” Long time Molotschna physician “of the poor,” Dr. Ketat of Montau, refused and “suffered a ghastly and brutal death” by the Germans (note 6).

Because of the mud, families found it necessary to cast off heavy possessions—sewing machines, sacks of flour and potatoes—within the first 48 hours.

The Marienthal and Schardau groups met with others from their district on Sept. 13 outside of Melitopol.

Sept. 14 was warm and sunny, and the unit covered 45 km; this “pleased the German authorities because they like we were eager to proceed as quickly as possible” (note 7). There was heavy rainfall the night of the 15th near Nishni-Sirogosi (Nizhniye Serogozy) everyone was wet the next morning.

On Sept. 19, the Gnadenfeld contingent reached the Dnieper at Kakhovka to cross on a narrow military pontoon bridge. This took an extraordinarily long time because thousands of wagons, troops and military vehicles used this one bridge. Advanced Soviet forces had already pierced into this region--hence the speed with which the evacuation was orchestrated. “Literally the ground was already burning under the feet of the fleeing Molotschna Mennonites” (note 8). No fires were allowed at night for fear of air-strikes. On the 20th they were instructed to travel only 24 kms to Berislaw.


At this time some learnt of the Wehrmacht decision to lay mines and destroy evacuated Molotschna villages; they were not to fall back into the hands of the Red Army or serve as cover. This was Marienthal’s fate, but in the end larger villages like Halbstadt or Gnadenfeld remained intact.

On Sept. 22 the group reached Davidow Brod (Davydiv Brid) on the Inguletz River, where 1,500 other wagons assembled close to the bank for the night.

This first stage of evacuation included a number of deaths of children and elderly. My mother’s 8-year-old sister Lenchen had a typhus-like fever at the start of the trek, and day by day her situation became critical. A doctor insisted she be taken from the wagon to a medical transport along the route to Alexanderstadt (Alexandrovka); the hospital unit of Halbstadt had already been relocated. My grandmother was instructed to stay with her other children; her single sister-in-law accompanied Lenchen.


On Sept. 25, after some 12 days “under constant pressure and filled with fear that we would again fall into the hands of the Russians,” the Gnadenfeld contingent arrived 350 kms later at their temporary destination in the villages around Vladimirovka (Volodmyrivka) on the Inguletz River.

Lenchen and Aunt Tina arrived in Alexanderstadt where Lenchen's two brothers were also stationed (Ethnic German Cavalry unit). Alexanderstadt was 40 km west of the old Mennonite settlement of Zagradowka. Tina Bräul cared for Lenchen until her death on Sept. 28, only 15 days after leaving. She was 8 years old.

On that same day the Chief of the Security Police and SD wrote to the Immigration Central Office in Litzmannstadt that SS Oberführer Hoffmeyer was currently leading some 50,000 ethnic Germans out of the Halbstadt and Mariupol areas for resettlement in other areas of the “former” USSR, and not within the old boundaries of Germany (note 9). Also on Sept. 28, Soviet troops had reached the Dnieper River at Dnepropetrovsk.

The developments with Mennonite evacuees were communicated to Benjamin H. Unruh in Karlsruhe, Germany on Sept. 29 by SS Obersturmführer Dr. Gerhard Wolfrum of the Ethnic German Liaison Office (VoMi).

"Unfortunately, as you will have read from the Wehrmacht reports, some shifts have taken place on the Eastern Front … and all ethnic Germans from this area have been taken back across the Dnieper and will be (exclusively) reassigned to the settlement area around Kronau near the Inhuletz River [tributary of Dnieper]. … Dear Professor, at this moment I am unable to assess whether a trip would be expedient. Of course, these repatriations have imposed an infinite amount of hardship on the commando and, to an even greater extent, on the ethnic Germans; what these people have to go through psychologically with the loss of their homeland cannot be underestimated. Today I will correspond by telegraph with SS-Oberführer Hoffmeyer whether your trip is desired for these very reasons, and whether it is even technically feasible at this time." (Note 10)

Unruh travelled with a stipend from the SS Ethnic Liaison Office to gather and provide pastoral and political support for the refugees. Given the fast-paced developments, Unruh’s trip was impossible.

On Oct. 14, the “Molochna River” is mentioned by the Associated Press in an article reprinted across North America and the UK. Surely some of the thousands of Russländer Mennonites in Canada noticed and were anxious about relatives.

The papers reported fighting in Melitopol (pop. 25,000): “Breaking through elaborate German defences in the South Ukraine, the Russians forged the Molochna river and swept to the very center of Melitopol where fierce street battles were reported now in progress” (note 11). The Soviets "secured possession of Melitopol after ten days of most savage house-to-house fighting within the city and bitter fighting outside of it” (note 12). The Mennonitische Rundschau does not pick up on this story (note 13).

Melitopol was one "of the two escape railways open to the German garrisons in the Crimea. Its capture would be a milestone in the Russian drive to isolate the Crimea from the north,” the papers noted (note 14).


In a meeting led by Higher SS- and Police Leader Prützmann on Oct. 13, a new settlement structure west of the Dnieper was approved—consistent with Himmler’s original plan of fortified ethnic German communities and bases along transportation lines under SS-governance. Consequently, it was “the wish of the Reich Commissar” to "keep the Low Germans from the District of Halbstadt clustered in the area of Alexanderstadt.” These Volksdeutsche “settlement pearls” would then serve as a strategic military strongholds and buffers on the eastern edge of the territory (note 15).

But only 12 days later, on Oct. 25, the massive refugee trek started up again. There would be no return to Molotschna and Mennonite life on the Ukrainian steppe came to a definitive end.

           

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Trek Maps: 1) military (attached; BA (Bundesarchiv) R 69/215, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/invenio-viewer/lixe/files/49/37/493764b9-7b86-40a4-9f3e-bafa3170e260/R_69_215_0239.jpg); 2) Jacob A. Neufeld, Tiefenwege: Erfahrungen und Erlebnisse von Russland-Mennoniten in zweJahrzehnten bis 1949 (Virgil, ON: Niagara, 1958), attached; c) my Google Interactive map of the trek, http://bit.ly/2jHT6hD.

Trek Photos from Mennonite Library and Archives--Bethel College: https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/numbered-photos/.

Note 1: Cf. BA RH 22/142 (entire folder); regarding the military hospital, cf. doc. 82, frame 164; https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/6c56a19a-8e59-4cb1-a8a9-27ef05786abc/. Already in March 1943 some 12,000 ethnic Germans from the Donetz and Caucasus regions had been evacuated to Galicia; cf. Der Chef der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD, Einwandererzentralstelle, Kommission XVI Sonderzug, Lemberg, to the Einwandererzentralstelle Litzmannstatdt, March 6; March 20, 1943; BA R 69/704, doc. 218, 223; slides 437; 447, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/62e82039-e32f-401c-8eff-73637dae9129/.

Note 2: The following chronology is based on J. Neufeld, Tiefenwege, 101ff.; cf. also Katie Friesen, Into the Unknown (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1986); Harry Loewen, Road to Freedom: Mennonites Escape the Land of Suffering (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2000); K. Becker, in A.A. Töws, ed. Mennonitische Märtyrer der jüngsten Vergangenheit und der Gegenwart, vol. 2: Der große Leidensweg (North Clearbrook, BC: Self-published, 1954), 377–385; and a shorter summary in Frank H. Epp, Mennonite Exodus (Altona, MB: Friesen, 1962), 357–363.

Note 3: K. Friesen, Into the Unknown, 52.

Note 4: Cf. Selma Kornelsen Hooge and Anna Goossen Kornelsen, Life Before Canada (Abbotsford, BC: Self-published, 2018), 61.

Note 5: K. Friesen, Into the Unknown, 52.

Note 6: Cf. A. A. Toews, Mennonitische Märtyrer der jüngsten Vergangenheit II, 378; 38. Both he and his colleague Ivan I. Klassen are recognized by Jacob A. Neufeld for rebuilding the Muntau hospital (by Halbstadt) during Nazi occupation.

Note 7: K. Friesen, Into the Unknown, 52.

Note 8: Gerhard Lohrenz (Lose Blätter, III. Teil [Winnipeg, MB: Self-published, 1976], 106), notes that the Soviets had reached Bakhmach on September 8, took Krasnograd and Pawlograd on September 18, and reached the Dnieper River across from Dnepropetrovsk on September 28. However Melitopol and and Kahkovka were held by German troops until the end of October; cf. Robert Forczyk, The Dnepr 1943: Hitler’s Eastern Rampart Crumbles (Oxford: Osprey, 2016), 33, 70.

Note 9: Der Chef der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD [Ernst Kaltenbrunner], Einwandererzentralstelle, Kommission XVI Sonderzug, to the Einwandererzentrale Litzmannstadt (Lodz), September 28, 1943, BA R 69/704, no. 265 [slide 531], https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/62e82039-e32f-401c-8eff-73637dae9129/.

Note 10: SS Dr. Gerhard Wolfrum (VoMi) to Benjamin H. Unruh, September 29, 1943, Technische Hochschule (TH) Karlsruhe, Universitätsarchiv Karlsruhe, S499, Schrank 2a, Fach 24.

Note 11: “Russians drive new spearhead close to Kiev,” Associated Press. Clippings File. Europe Disorders, Oct. 14, 1943, https://archive.org/details/sim_associated-press-clippings-file-europe-disorders_1943-10/page/n311/mode/2up.

Note 12: “The War in Russia, (September 24 to October 22, 1943),” The Field Artillery Journal 33, no. 12 (1943): 910, https://archive.org/details/sim_field-artillery_1943-12_33_12/page/908/mode/2up?q=molochna.

Note 13: The Rundschau does not mention either “Molotschna,” “Molochna,” or “Melitopol” between October 15 and December 31, 1943. See https://archive.org/details/die-mennonitische-rundschau_1943-12-29_66_52/mode/2up?q=melitopol.

Note 14: “Russian Army on verge of major victories; Four important strategic centres almost in grasp,” The Ontario Intelligencer (Belleville), October 14, 1943, 1, https://archive.org/details/intelligencer-october-1943/page/n123/mode/2up.

Note 15: Ingeborg Fleischhauer, Das Dritte Reich und die Deutschen in der Sowjetunion (Stuttgart: Deutsches Verlags-Anstalt, 1983), 241f.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Invitation to the Russian Consulate, Danzig, January 19, 1788

B elow is one of the most important original Mennonite artifacts I have seen. It concerns January 19. The two land scouts Jacob Höppner and Johann Bartsch had returned to Danzig from Russia on November 10, 1787 with the Russian Immigration Agent, Georg von Trappe. Soon thereafter, Trappe had copies of the royal decree and agreement (Gnadenbrief) printed for distribution in the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig and other locations, dated December 29, 1787 ( see pic ; note 1 ). After the flyer was handed out to congregants in Danzig after worship on January 13, 1788, city councilors made the most bitter accusations against church elders for allowing Trappe and the Russian Consulate to do this; something similar had happened before ( note 2 ). In the flyer Trappe boasted that land scouts Höppner and Bartsch met not only with Gregory Potemkin, Catherine the Great’s vice-regent and administrator of New Russia, but also with “the Most Gracious Russian Monarch” herse...

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...

Eduard Wüst: A “Second Menno”?

Arguably the most significant outside religious influence on Mennonite s in the 19th century was the revivalist preaching of Eduard Wüst, a university-trained Württemberg Pietist minister installed by the separatist Evangelical Brethren Church in New Russia in 1843 ( note 1 ). With the end-time prophesies of a previous generation of Pietists (and many Mennonites) coming to naught, Wüst introduced Germans in this area of New Russia to the “New Pietism” and its more individualistic, emotional conversion experience and sermons on the free grace of God centred on the cross of Christ ( note 2 ). Wüst’s 1851 Christmas sermon series give a good picture of what was changing ( note 3 ). His core agenda was to dispel gloom (which maybe could describe more traditional Mennonites) and induce Christian joy. This is the root impulse of the Mennonite Brethren beginnings years later in 1860. “Satan is not entitled to present his own as the most joyful.” His people “sing, jump, leap ( hüpfen ) ...

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

"Between Monarchs" a lot can happen (like revolt). A Mennonite "Accession" Prayer for the Monarch

It is surprising for many to learn that Russian Mennonites sang the Russian national anthem "God save the Tsar" in special worship services ... frequently! We have a "Mennonite prayer" and sermon sample for the accession of the monarch ( Thronbesteigung ) or its anniversary, with closing prayer-- and another Mennonite sampler of a coronation ( Krönung ) prayer, sermon and closing prayer ( note 1 ). After 70 years with one monarch, the manual is made for a time like this--try sharing it with your Canadian Mennonite pastor ;) Technically there is no “between” monarchs: “The Queen is Dead. Long live the King!” But there is much that happens or can happen before the coronation of the new monarch. Including revolt. Mennonites in Molotschna had hosted Tsar Alexander I shortly before his death in 1825. Upon his death in December, Alexander's brother and heir Constantine declined succession, and prior to the coronation of the next brother Nicholas, some 3,000 rebel (mos...

Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (Holodomor), 1932-1933

In 2008 the Canadian Parliament passed an act declaring the fourth Saturday in November as “Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (‘Holodomor’) Memorial Day” ( note 1 ). Southern Ukraine was arguably the worst affected region of the famine of 1932–33, where 30,000 to 40,000 Mennonites lived ( note 2 ). The number of famine-related deaths in Ukraine during this period are conservatively estimated at 3.5 million ( note 3 ). In the early 1930s Stalin feared growing “Ukrainian nationalism” and the possibility of “losing Ukraine” ( note 4 ). He was also suspicious of ethnic Poles and Germans—like Mennonites—in Ukraine, convinced of the “existence of an organized counter-revolutionary insurgent underground” in support of Ukrainian national independence ( note 5 ). Ukraine was targeted with a “lengthy schooling” designed to ruthlessly break the threat of Ukrainian nationalism and resistance, and this included Ukraine’s Mennonites (viewed simply as “Germans”). Various causes combined to bring on w...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...