Skip to main content

Last Days of Mennonite Life on the Molotschna, September 1943

The Molotschna Mennonite Colony was established in 1803; 140 years later its villages were evacuated by retreating German armies. A map of the larger German operation of 1943 and the various "Trecks" is attached. The tens of thousands of evacuees included some 35,000 Mennonites. Nazi Germany had utterly failed Ukrainians, but continued to have plans for their "ethnic Germans" in the east.


On Sept. 8, 1943, the Red Army successfully took Donetsk (Stalino), 230 km east of Molotschna. The next day, S.S. administrators gave orders that every Molotschna family should load one wagon with their possessions and prepare for an orderly evacuation.

Hitler was intent on holding Crimea, and sought to set up a defensive line from Zaporizhzhia to Melitopol and south to the Sea of Azov. Evacuation plans east of this line were in place since late June—initially to be resettled “somewhere” west of the Dnieper; on Aug. 17 first steps were taken to move 8,000 hospital beds west of the Dnieper (note 1).

The day after the fall of Donetsk on Sept 8 (note 2), work on Molotschna fields ceased as everyone prepared for evacuation. The Ethnic German Cavalry confiscated horses and wagons from neighbouring villages so that all departing families would have adequate transportation.


A-frame shelters had to be built over the rear of the wagons. Some took a cow; remaining pigs, sheep and chickens were butchered and pickled. As much baking as possible was also done; Zwieback, Mennonite buns, were toasted. Some remember how their mothers took sacks of dried cherries, apples, pears, and plums as well. Clothes and bedding were washed and packed together with small implements and kitchenware.


The villages of Marienthal (my mother's village), Schardau and Pordenau and 12 others were part of the “Gnadenfeld Support District” (Betreuungs-Bezirk). Villages were led by mayors and every group of 10 wagons had a captain. The Gnadenfeld District had ca. 2,000 wagons, which if lined up stretched 20 km. (note 3).

Sept. 12–16: Late into the night the Marienthalers travelled to Alexanderkrone—already fully occupied—and then to Kleefeld just as rains began; here evacuees slept in an old windowless school or on wagons (note 4). Katie Friesen recalls:

“Our departure that morning was heart-breaking and depressing. The rain and the accompanying dreariness reflected our own sadness about having to leave our home. It also meant that the roads that we were to travel would be soft and difficult to traverse. German troops were everywhere in our village anxiously awaiting our departure… . Their very presence emphasized the urgency to evacuate with haste as the Germans were rapidly retreating.” (Note 5)

Those who refused to leave “were threatened to be shot, and this actually happened later as well.” Long time Molotschna physician “of the poor,” Dr. Ketat of Montau, refused and “suffered a ghastly and brutal death” by the Germans (note 6).

Because of the mud, families found it necessary to cast off heavy possessions—sewing machines, sacks of flour and potatoes—within the first 48 hours.

The Marienthal and Schardau groups met with others from their district on Sept. 13 outside of Melitopol.

Sept. 14 was warm and sunny, and the unit covered 45 km; this “pleased the German authorities because they like we were eager to proceed as quickly as possible” (note 7). There was heavy rainfall the night of the 15th near Nishni-Sirogosi (Nizhniye Serogozy) everyone was wet the next morning.

On Sept. 19, the Gnadenfeld contingent reached the Dnieper at Kakhovka to cross on a narrow military pontoon bridge. This took an extraordinarily long time because thousands of wagons, troops and military vehicles used this one bridge. Advanced Soviet forces had already pierced into this region--hence the speed with which the evacuation was orchestrated. “Literally the ground was already burning under the feet of the fleeing Molotschna Mennonites” (note 8). No fires were allowed at night for fear of air-strikes. On the 20th they were instructed to travel only 24 kms to Berislaw.


At this time some learnt of the Wehrmacht decision to lay mines and destroy evacuated Molotschna villages; they were not to fall back into the hands of the Red Army or serve as cover. This was Marienthal’s fate, but in the end larger villages like Halbstadt or Gnadenfeld remained intact.

On Sept. 22 the group reached Davidow Brod (Davydiv Brid) on the Inguletz River, where 1,500 other wagons assembled close to the bank for the night.

This first stage of evacuation included a number of deaths of children and elderly. My mother’s 8-year-old sister Lenchen had a typhus-like fever at the start of the trek, and day by day her situation became critical. A doctor insisted she be taken from the wagon to a medical transport along the route to Alexanderstadt (Alexandrovka); the hospital unit of Halbstadt had already been relocated. My grandmother was instructed to stay with her other children; her single sister-in-law accompanied Lenchen.


On Sept. 25, after some 12 days “under constant pressure and filled with fear that we would again fall into the hands of the Russians,” the Gnadenfeld contingent arrived 350 kms later at their temporary destination in the villages around Vladimirovka (Volodmyrivka) on the Inguletz River.

Lenchen and Aunt Tina arrived in Alexanderstadt where Lenchen's two brothers were also stationed (Ethnic German Cavalry unit). Alexanderstadt was 40 km west of the old Mennonite settlement of Zagradowka. Tina Bräul cared for Lenchen until her death on Sept. 28, only 15 days after leaving. She was 8 years old.

On that same day the Chief of the Security Police and SD wrote to the Immigration Central Office in Litzmannstadt that SS Oberführer Hoffmeyer was currently leading some 50,000 ethnic Germans out of the Halbstadt and Mariupol areas for resettlement in other areas of the “former” USSR, and not within the old boundaries of Germany (note 9). Also on Sept. 28, Soviet troops had reached the Dnieper River at Dnepropetrovsk.

The developments with Mennonite evacuees were communicated to Benjamin H. Unruh in Karlsruhe, Germany on Sept. 29 by SS Obersturmführer Dr. Gerhard Wolfrum of the Ethnic German Liaison Office (VoMi).

"Unfortunately, as you will have read from the Wehrmacht reports, some shifts have taken place on the Eastern Front … and all ethnic Germans from this area have been taken back across the Dnieper and will be (exclusively) reassigned to the settlement area around Kronau near the Inhuletz River [tributary of Dnieper]. … Dear Professor, at this moment I am unable to assess whether a trip would be expedient. Of course, these repatriations have imposed an infinite amount of hardship on the commando and, to an even greater extent, on the ethnic Germans; what these people have to go through psychologically with the loss of their homeland cannot be underestimated. Today I will correspond by telegraph with SS-Oberführer Hoffmeyer whether your trip is desired for these very reasons, and whether it is even technically feasible at this time." (Note 10)

Unruh travelled with a stipend from the SS Ethnic Liaison Office to gather and provide pastoral and political support for the refugees. Given the fast-paced developments, Unruh’s trip was impossible.

On Oct. 14, the “Molochna River” is mentioned by the Associated Press in an article reprinted across North America and the UK. Surely some of the thousands of Russländer Mennonites in Canada noticed and were anxious about relatives.

The papers reported fighting in Melitopol (pop. 25,000): “Breaking through elaborate German defences in the South Ukraine, the Russians forged the Molochna river and swept to the very center of Melitopol where fierce street battles were reported now in progress” (note 11). The Soviets "secured possession of Melitopol after ten days of most savage house-to-house fighting within the city and bitter fighting outside of it” (note 12). The Mennonitische Rundschau does not pick up on this story (note 13).

Melitopol was one "of the two escape railways open to the German garrisons in the Crimea. Its capture would be a milestone in the Russian drive to isolate the Crimea from the north,” the papers noted (note 14).


In a meeting led by Higher SS- and Police Leader Prützmann on Oct. 13, a new settlement structure west of the Dnieper was approved—consistent with Himmler’s original plan of fortified ethnic German communities and bases along transportation lines under SS-governance. Consequently, it was “the wish of the Reich Commissar” to "keep the Low Germans from the District of Halbstadt clustered in the area of Alexanderstadt.” These Volksdeutsche “settlement pearls” would then serve as a strategic military strongholds and buffers on the eastern edge of the territory (note 15).

But only 12 days later, on Oct. 25, the massive refugee trek started up again. There would be no return to Molotschna and Mennonite life on the Ukrainian steppe came to a definitive end.

           

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Trek Maps: 1) military (attached; BA (Bundesarchiv) R 69/215, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/invenio-viewer/lixe/files/49/37/493764b9-7b86-40a4-9f3e-bafa3170e260/R_69_215_0239.jpg); 2) Jacob A. Neufeld, Tiefenwege: Erfahrungen und Erlebnisse von Russland-Mennoniten in zweJahrzehnten bis 1949 (Virgil, ON: Niagara, 1958), attached; c) my Google Interactive map of the trek, http://bit.ly/2jHT6hD.

Trek Photos from Mennonite Library and Archives--Bethel College: https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/numbered-photos/.

Note 1: Cf. BA RH 22/142 (entire folder); regarding the military hospital, cf. doc. 82, frame 164; https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/6c56a19a-8e59-4cb1-a8a9-27ef05786abc/. Already in March 1943 some 12,000 ethnic Germans from the Donetz and Caucasus regions had been evacuated to Galicia; cf. Der Chef der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD, Einwandererzentralstelle, Kommission XVI Sonderzug, Lemberg, to the Einwandererzentralstelle Litzmannstatdt, March 6; March 20, 1943; BA R 69/704, doc. 218, 223; slides 437; 447, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/62e82039-e32f-401c-8eff-73637dae9129/.

Note 2: The following chronology is based on J. Neufeld, Tiefenwege, 101ff.; cf. also Katie Friesen, Into the Unknown (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1986); Harry Loewen, Road to Freedom: Mennonites Escape the Land of Suffering (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2000); K. Becker, in A.A. Töws, ed. Mennonitische Märtyrer der jüngsten Vergangenheit und der Gegenwart, vol. 2: Der große Leidensweg (North Clearbrook, BC: Self-published, 1954), 377–385; and a shorter summary in Frank H. Epp, Mennonite Exodus (Altona, MB: Friesen, 1962), 357–363.

Note 3: K. Friesen, Into the Unknown, 52.

Note 4: Cf. Selma Kornelsen Hooge and Anna Goossen Kornelsen, Life Before Canada (Abbotsford, BC: Self-published, 2018), 61.

Note 5: K. Friesen, Into the Unknown, 52.

Note 6: Cf. A. A. Toews, Mennonitische Märtyrer der jüngsten Vergangenheit II, 378; 38. Both he and his colleague Ivan I. Klassen are recognized by Jacob A. Neufeld for rebuilding the Muntau hospital (by Halbstadt) during Nazi occupation.

Note 7: K. Friesen, Into the Unknown, 52.

Note 8: Gerhard Lohrenz (Lose Blätter, III. Teil [Winnipeg, MB: Self-published, 1976], 106), notes that the Soviets had reached Bakhmach on September 8, took Krasnograd and Pawlograd on September 18, and reached the Dnieper River across from Dnepropetrovsk on September 28. However Melitopol and and Kahkovka were held by German troops until the end of October; cf. Robert Forczyk, The Dnepr 1943: Hitler’s Eastern Rampart Crumbles (Oxford: Osprey, 2016), 33, 70.

Note 9: Der Chef der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD [Ernst Kaltenbrunner], Einwandererzentralstelle, Kommission XVI Sonderzug, to the Einwandererzentrale Litzmannstadt (Lodz), September 28, 1943, BA R 69/704, no. 265 [slide 531], https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/62e82039-e32f-401c-8eff-73637dae9129/.

Note 10: SS Dr. Gerhard Wolfrum (VoMi) to Benjamin H. Unruh, September 29, 1943, Technische Hochschule (TH) Karlsruhe, Universitätsarchiv Karlsruhe, S499, Schrank 2a, Fach 24.

Note 11: “Russians drive new spearhead close to Kiev,” Associated Press. Clippings File. Europe Disorders, Oct. 14, 1943, https://archive.org/details/sim_associated-press-clippings-file-europe-disorders_1943-10/page/n311/mode/2up.

Note 12: “The War in Russia, (September 24 to October 22, 1943),” The Field Artillery Journal 33, no. 12 (1943): 910, https://archive.org/details/sim_field-artillery_1943-12_33_12/page/908/mode/2up?q=molochna.

Note 13: The Rundschau does not mention either “Molotschna,” “Molochna,” or “Melitopol” between October 15 and December 31, 1943. See https://archive.org/details/die-mennonitische-rundschau_1943-12-29_66_52/mode/2up?q=melitopol.

Note 14: “Russian Army on verge of major victories; Four important strategic centres almost in grasp,” The Ontario Intelligencer (Belleville), October 14, 1943, 1, https://archive.org/details/intelligencer-october-1943/page/n123/mode/2up.

Note 15: Ingeborg Fleischhauer, Das Dritte Reich und die Deutschen in der Sowjetunion (Stuttgart: Deutsches Verlags-Anstalt, 1983), 241f.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"They are useful to the state." An almost forgotten Prussian view of Mennonites, ca. 1780s-90s

In 1787 Mennonite interest for emigration was extremely strong outside the quasi independent City of Danzig in the Prussian annexed Marienwerder and Elbing regions. Even before the land scouts Johann Bartsch and Jacob Höppner had returned from Russia later that year, so many Mennonite exit applications had flooded offices that officials wrote Berlin in August 1787 for direction ( note 1a ). Initially officials did not see a problem: because Mennonites do not provide soldiers, the cantons lose nothing by their departure, and in fact benefit from the ten-percent tax imposed on financial assets leaving the state.  Ludwig von Baczko (1756-1823), Professor of History at the Artillery Academy in Königsberg, East Prussia, was the general editor of a series that included a travelogue through Prussia written by a certain Karl Ephraim Nanke. Nanke had no special love for Mennonites, but was generally balanced in his judgements and based his now almost forgotten account of Mennonites on perso...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flight from Flanders to Friesland

In the latter half of the sixteenth century Protestantism gradually spread throughout the northern Netherlands in the form of Calvinism—which had a direct impact on Anabaptists. When the Northern Provinces of the Netherlands led by the exiled Protestant Prince William of Orange went to war against Spain in 1568, persecution of Anabaptists in Catholic Flanders increased again. Long before the Protestant Northern Provinces would declare independence in 1581, the inquisition against Anabaptists in Bruges, for example, had achieved its goal. With the last two Anabaptist executions in the city in 1573, the once large and thriving Mennonite congregation was extinguished. Subsequently Mennonites lived in Bruges only on rare occasions, and when present, for only a short time, as for example the well-known art historian Karel van Mander in 1582 ( note 1 ). In the Northern Provinces Calvinism had become attractive theologically and politically. Not only was Christian resistance to tyrannical gov...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (Holodomor), 1932-1933

In 2008 the Canadian Parliament passed an act declaring the fourth Saturday in November as “Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (‘Holodomor’) Memorial Day” ( note 1 ). Southern Ukraine was arguably the worst affected region of the famine of 1932–33, where 30,000 to 40,000 Mennonites lived ( note 2 ). The number of famine-related deaths in Ukraine during this period are conservatively estimated at 3.5 million ( note 3 ). In the early 1930s Stalin feared growing “Ukrainian nationalism” and the possibility of “losing Ukraine” ( note 4 ). He was also suspicious of ethnic Poles and Germans—like Mennonites—in Ukraine, convinced of the “existence of an organized counter-revolutionary insurgent underground” in support of Ukrainian national independence ( note 5 ). Ukraine was targeted with a “lengthy schooling” designed to ruthlessly break the threat of Ukrainian nationalism and resistance, and this included Ukraine’s Mennonites (viewed simply as “Germans”). Various causes combined to bring on w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß";  note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Between Monarchs" a lot can happen (like revolt). A Mennonite "Accession" Prayer for the Monarch

It is surprising for many to learn that Russian Mennonites sang the Russian national anthem "God save the Tsar" in special worship services ... frequently! We have a "Mennonite prayer" and sermon sample for the accession of the monarch ( Thronbesteigung ) or its anniversary, with closing prayer-- and another Mennonite sampler of a coronation ( Krönung ) prayer, sermon and closing prayer ( note 1 ). After 70 years with one monarch, the manual is made for a time like this--try sharing it with your Canadian Mennonite pastor ;) Technically there is no “between” monarchs: “The Queen is Dead. Long live the King!” But there is much that happens or can happen before the coronation of the new monarch. Including revolt. Mennonites in Molotschna had hosted Tsar Alexander I shortly before his death in 1825. Upon his death in December, Alexander's brother and heir Constantine declined succession, and prior to the coronation of the next brother Nicholas, some 3,000 rebel (mos...
Post a Comment
Read more