Skip to main content

"Motherhood of the People": Halbstadt Midwife Helene Berg and the SS

Recently Benjamin Goossen posted an important piece on the “well-known” Halbstadt midwife Helene Berg. Reichsführer SS Heinrich Himmler had taken a special interest in “old Mrs. Berg” and had publicly recognized her for helping birth some 8,000 Volksdeutsche (ethnic German) babies (note 1).

Goossen and I have shared archival materials in the past years. Below I would like to continue the exploration of Taunte Bojsche (or "Aunt Berg") and the surprisingly broad interest in her by Nazi officials as icon.


I begin with a family story as a window onto the times.

Some 35,000 Mennonites were evacuated out of German-occupied Ukraine in Fall 1943. After a grueling trek west the survivors landed in German-annexed Wartheland (previously Poland) where they were naturalized as German citizens.

My grandmother Helene Bräul had eight children, and Helene Berg may very well have been her midwife for one or more of them. Like many Mennonite mothers in Wartheland, my grandmother was “honoured” at a local event for the number of sons she had serving in the army (including two in the Waffen-SS) and was presented with a large portrait of Hitler.

My grandmother embodied the pragmatic Nazi view of a Volksdeutsche woman: a sturdy peasant who bore many strong children, had kept the race “pure” and also worked the land. Helene Bräul and her generation were not easily excitable, but she was afraid of the consequences of not hanging up the picture. She told daughters Käthe (my mother) and Sara, “I do not want that picture; I just want our boys back.”

Such events designed to celebrate and revive motherhood were usually held on the birthday of Hitler’s mother and were carefully executed because of the importance placed by the regime on rearing a new generation of soldiers.

At these events a speaker would normally recite Hitler’s comments on the mother’s role in the German Reich for the “up-building of the Volk” and for the recovery of the nation:

“What the man gives in heroic-courage on the battlefield, the woman gives in eternally patient devotion, in eternally patient suffering and endurance. Every child that she brings into the world is a battle which she wages for the being or non-being of her Volk. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they recognize that each performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained.” (Note 2)

That was a notable contrast to the “Day of Women” which they had celebrated annually in the Soviet Union on March 8; on that day Stalin was officially praised for the liberation and freedom he brought women (note 3). Now under a new totalitarian regime, the goal of these women was simply to stay alive and to keep their children alive.

This context may help in part to understand official interest in the Midwife Berg.

Mrs. Berg was known not only by thousands in the Molotschna settlement area; the German Mennonite (Vereinigung) denominational chair and pastor in Elbing, Emil Händiges, had been well acquainted with Mrs. Berg for decades. She had been in Basel, Switzerland when Händiges and Benjamin Unruh were students there, ca. 1906 to 1907.


“The concern about midwife Helene Berg… also moves me deeply. I know this brave and well-deserving woman personally from Basel [Switzerland], where she accompanied the two ethnic German Mennonites, sisters Katarina and Helene Willms, who studied there about 35 years ago, and with whom we had a Mennonite literary circle with about 10 to 12 participants … [In the past year] I have kept in touch with Mrs. Berg and sent her old issues of the Mennonitische Blätter.” (Note 4)

Her travels, training and friendship with these leaders—and their respect for her—point to her intellectual capacities and broad range of interests.

Goossen refers to a letter from May 1942 from Hans Spittler to Händiges about Mrs. Berg. Spittler was Händiges' nephew, the son of city a missionary, and by training an engineer in the German military (Organization Todt) assigned to the Dnieper River dam project near Einlage, Chortitiza.

From occupied Ukraine Spittler wrote a letter to his uncle Emil with greetings from the 84-year-old Halbstadt midwife. “Despite her advanced years she was physically and intellectual fit … and curious about everything, even political matters. She had studied the Führer’s [Mein] Kampf with the appropriate interest,” the young man reported (note 5).

Spittler wrote his uncle that “the German essence and nature (Art) in this Volk are healthy and strong enough to withstand the blows and tests which they had to endure.” It was during this period that the second most powerful man in Nazi-Germany--Reichsführer SS Heinrich Himmler--visited Halbstadt and awarded Old Mother Berg for her role in the motherhood of a people.

The war began to turn in 1943 and the Volksdeutsche were ordered to cross to the west bank of the Dnieper in September and eventually retreat out of Ukraine altogether. Berg wrote Unruh on November 20 that she hadn’t slept in a real bed in seven weeks, and now in Kamenetz-Podol’sk winter was upon them. She wrote that she was “willing to endure anything so long as our Germany retains the victory against evil Bolshevism and saves us from the hands of our enemies” (note 6).

In the same month Unruh made a request to Heubuden Elder Bruno Ewert (Nazi Party member) and Gustav Reimer, church historian and deacon in Heubuden, to find a small house for Mrs. Berg with her elderly sister and niece/caregiver Agnes Wiens, because the Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle ("VoMi"; Coordination Center for Ethnic Germans) ultimately under Himmler explicitly desired that Mrs. Berg be cared for into her sunset years (note 7). The VoMi also wanted a cow for Mrs Berg—like she and her sister had in Halbstadt, and also on the west side of the Dnieper at Alexanderstadt after the first stretch of the Trek west. (Many left Molotschna with a cow, and niece Agnes was “an exceptional milker”).

But the Heubuden church had nothing available. The best they could offer was perhaps a room at the Heubuden seniors residence—which the VoMi did not want. But even the former idea was a problem: it already had 12 elderly women and one elderly man and no extra space. Unruh pushed hard in the correspondence, saying that SS Obersturmführer Dr. Wolfrum “emphatically” wished for this to work out, not least because he had received hospitality in her home a year earlier; Wolfrum was the representative of SS Oberführer Hoffmeyer (note 8). Unruh emphasized that Himmler wanted “to honour us [emphasis in original] through her” (note 9).

Reimer and Unruh had a long working relationship, but the correspondence shows it was under increasing stress during this time of resettlement. The “midwife Berg issue” brought these tensions to a boiling point in their correspondence.

As soon as Unruh had word of Berg’s arrival in German-annexed Poland, he wrote her a letter: “But we know that Taunte Bojsche can do more than the others. How often did I admire you during the [Russian] Revolution, how you jumped up in the middle of the night and, where the greatest dangers threatened, helped some working-class woman to give birth to her baby” (note 10).

The letter gives evidence that she was more than a sweet old lady from his beloved Halbstadt. Unruh had just completed two longer historical-theological treatises (one on baptism) to serve as a framework for unifying the Mennonite and Mennonite Brethren groups coming out of Ukraine; in the letter he specifically asked for her feedback on the drafts. “As our much-experienced sister and mother, your judgement is of great value.”

Sidenote to Himmler:

In his correspondence with the Vereinigung denominational executive, Unruh always showed great pride in his various government and Nazi Party connections—but always of course on behalf of his Mennonite people. But nothing seemed more significant for Unruh than his meeting with Heinrich Himmler, January 1 to 3, 1943. Over these three days they had talks over lunch and supper, and then an exhaustive, one-hour business meeting together with Hoffmeyer and Lorenz as well. Unruh wrote his German pastor friend Abraham Braun (also born in Russia) that he “anticipates significant consequences for our entire Mennonitica from this consultation” with Reichsführer Himmler.


“I was received and treated with exceptional warmth, and I was told the most complimentary things about Mennonites, especially the Volk German Mennonites. … The Reichsführer will eliminate any existing “dualisms,” and Reichs-German and Volks-German Mennonites will be treated in the exact same manner.” (Note 11)

In this meeting Himmler brought greetings to Unruh from Mrs. Berg.

At the end of his piece Goossen asks: “And what about Berg herself? The archival documents by and about her suggest intriguing new directions for research about Mennonites, reproduction, and the elderly under fascism—topics still waiting to be explored.”

While it is somewhat unclear how much and how fast Soviet Mennonites under German occupation embraced the vision for reproduction propagated by Nazi Germany, Mennonite clergy from the Reich shared the worldview of their state and could speak of childbirth for the nation as a woman’s “highest and holiest determination” (note 12) topped with the concern for “healthy breeding” and against Volk-destructive “racial contamination” (note 13).

These themes were consistent with those repeated in the press and in official speeches on “German womenhood.” This ostensibly conservative concept of motherhood placed a woman’s highest call in connection to the “motherhood of the people”—and above the immediate parenting and protection of their actual living children.

Mrs. Berg immigrated to Canada on July 28, 1948, and died in Winnipeg on October 1, 1951 (note 14).

             ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast  

---Notes---

Pics: Thanks to Brent Wiebe for identifying archival video footage thought to be Helene Berg at Halbstadt in the summer of 1943: http://www.archiv-akh.de/filme?utf-8=%E2%9C%93&q=halbstadt#1. See Wiebe’s website: https://trailsofthepast.com/helene-berg/.

Note 1: Benjamin Goossen, “Himmler’s Mennonite Midwife,” Anabaptist Historians, posted August 13, 2020, https://anabaptisthistorians.org/2020/08/13/himmlers-mennonite-midwife/. Cf. GRanDMA #173286 for Helene Berg.  

Note 2: Adolf Hitler, “Die völkische Sendung der Frau,” in N.S. Frauenbuch, edited by Ellen Semmelroth and Renata von Stieda, 9–14 (Munich: Lehmanns, 1934), 11, https://archive.org/details/SemmelrothEllenUndStiedaRenateVonN.S.Frauenbuch1934287S.ScanFraktur/page/n9/mode/2up.

Note 3: Eduard Allert [pseud. for Eduard Reimer], “The Lost Generation,” in The Lost Generation and other Stories, edited by Gerhard Lohrenz, 9–128 (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1982), 32.

Note 4: Emil Händiges to Benjamin Unruh and Ernst Crous, December 1, 1943, [1943a 36 of 104] Vereinigung Collection 1943, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle, Bolanden-Weierhof, Germany, hereafter MFS.

Note 5: Hans Spittler to Emil Händiges, May 7, 1942; copied in Emil Händiges to Benjamin Unruh and Abraham Fast, May 18, 1942, Vereinigung Collection 1942, MFW.

Note 6: Copied in Benjamin Unruh to Hans Epp [former Chortitza district mayor], December 5, 1943, Vereinigung Collection 1943, MFS.

Note 7: Gustav Reimer to Benjamin Unruh, December 20, 1943, Vereinigung Collection 1943, MFW. 1943a 18.

Note 8: Cf. also Unruh to Epp, December 5, 1943; Benjamin Unruh to Gustav Reimer, December 5, 1943; and Benjamin Unruh to Emil Händiges, November 18, 1943; Vereinigung Collection 1943, MFW.

Note 9: Cf. Unruh to Epp, December 5, 1943.

Note 10: Benjamin Unruh to Helene Berg, February 3, 1944, in Benjamin Unruh – Abraham Braun Correspondence, MFW.

Note 11: Benjamin Unruh to Vereinigung Executive, January 6, 1943, Vereinigung Collection 1943, MFW.

Note 12: Horst Quiring, “Ehe” and “Leib,” in Grundworte des Glaubens: Achtzig wichtige biblische Begriffe für den Menschen der Gegenwart dargestellt (Berlin: Furche, 1938), 58; 147, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1938,%20Quiring,%20Grundworte%20des%20Glaubens/DSCF9361.JPG; https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1938,%20Quiring,%20Grundworte%20des%20Glaubens/DSCF9405.JPG.

Note 13: Cf. Krefeld Pastor Gustav Kraemer, Wir und unsere Volksgemeinschaft 1938. Lecture delivered in Heubuden, West Prussia, January 25, 1938 (Krefeld: Consistorium der Mennonitengemeinde Krefeld, 1938) 8, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1938,%20Kraemer%20Wir%20und%20unsere%20Volksgemeinschaft/Worse%20Copy/DSCF7381.JPG.

Note 14: Cf. her autobiographical account of the closing year of the war and the immediate post-war period: Helene Berg, Unsere Flucht: Erinnerungen von Helene Berg, frueher Halbstadt, Sued Russland (Thomashof/Baden, 1947).

Print Friendly and PDF
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The End of Schardau (and other Molotschna villages), 1941

My grandmother was four-years old when her parents moved from Petershagen, Molotschna to Schardau in 1908. This story is larger than that of Schardau, but tells how this village and many others in Molotschna were evacuated by Stalin days before the arrival of German troops in 1941. -ANF The bridge across the Dnieper at Chortitza was destroyed by retreating Soviet troops on August 18, 1941 and the hydroelectric dam completed near Einlage in 1932 was also dynamited by NKVD personnel—killing at least 20,000 locals downstream, and forcing the Germans to cross further south at Nikopol. For the next six-and-a-half weeks, the old Mennonite settlement area of Chortitza was continuously shelled by Soviet troops from Zaporozhje on the east side of the river ( note 1 ). The majority of Russian Germans in Crimea and Ukraine paid dearly for Germany’s Blitzkrieg and plans for racially-based population resettlements. As early as August 3, 1941, the Supreme Command of the Soviet Forces received noti...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more