Skip to main content

"No Jewish Doctors Wanted" (I): Prof. Unruh and Fernheim's need, 1933

A deadly epidemic broke out in MCC’s new settlement in Fernheim, Paraguay in 1930. Settlers had been present for less than a year, and had recorded 20 births and 88 deaths by December 31 (note 1).

Health care remained a significant concern in Fernheim even after the epidemic was halted with the emergency medical intervention of Paraguayan military doctors. Mennonites were wholly responsible for their own health care. In 1933 and 1934 there was a malaria outbreak with 31 deaths and 30 deaths respectively, compared to 11 deaths in 1932 (note 2). My father born in 1932 almost did not survive 1933: "He is very thin. It often seems to me that we will not be able to keep him by our side. He was such a happy and lively boy, but the illness has gone so far," my grandmother wrote family in Canada (note 3).

Early in 1934 the Fernheim Colony reported in the Germany Mennonite denominational paper that “the state of health leaves much to be desired. Malaria still hits the villages back and forth. Some are literally languishing with this disease.” The writer asks speculatively and reports a rumour: “Will we have a doctor among us soon? Preacher Isaak who is the head of the hospital told me the other day that a certain Mr. Fast from the Island of Java had agreed to come to Paraguay” (note 4).

By 1936 Fernheim’s mentor and liaison with the German government, Prof. Benjamin Unruh understood their failure. In a letter to his MCC colleagues he wrote that they had “experimented with three doctors. The first two were bad drinkers, the last young and inexperienced. ... In my opinion, it is a great defect of the settlement that there is no proper doctor there” (note 5).

However what Unruh does not mention is that in August 1933 he personally and vigorously rejected the opportunity to bring three distinguished Jewish doctors to the colony from West Prussia—one a friend of Vereinigung denominational chair Emil Händiges, pastor and elder of the Elbing Mennonite Church. The doctors were seeking to flee Hitler’s new Germany in August 1933.


A recently uncovered set of letters between Unruh and Händiges reveals the details of that decision.

August 23, 1933—Elbing Elder Emil Händiges had hardly slept. It seemed like one of those rare but obvious answers to prayer. Three outstanding Elbing Jewish medical doctors (including a couple, husband and wife doctors) were prepared to leave Germany immediately and set up their practices in Fernheim, Paraguay.

Händiges wrote to his colleague Unruh with the news:

“… They turned to me as the Elder of the Mennonites, a denomination that has experienced twists of fate in its history similar to theirs. 'We are not afraid of the wild Chaco … if only we are not rejected because we are Jews and if only we can continue to practice our profession in peace. We do not care about making money, if we can only live our lives and breathe freely again, especially in consideration of our children,"—this is what Dr. Lauter said to me almost verbatim in our conversation yesterday. Therefore, dear Benjamin, ... consider if this is not one of the very rare occasions where God wants to bring together people from different camps in order to help both parts according to His miraculous counsel, which we were allowed to experience so often in the [relief work] matters of “Brothers in need.” (Note 6)

There were some 600 Jews in Elbing prior to the Hitler regime (1933 to 1945). In 1929 the local Jewish synagogue helped raise funds for Mennonite refugees through “Brothers in Need,” which supported those rescued from Moscow in 1929 and temporarily housed in Germany (note 7). Many of these Mennonites went on to Paraguay with the basic tools, household utensils, and implements purchased with in Germany with that aid.


Now the Elbing Jewish community was in need, and Händiges was visited by one of “the most outstanding Jewish physicians in our city.” Mennonites and Jews in Elbing had shared a long, common story as a minority disadvantaged group, historically together on the outside edges of the city (note 8). The synagogue and the church were in short walking distance from each other.


Unruh received the letter but rejected the idea out of hand—the response was immediate and unequivocal (note 9).

Below is a timeline of events leading to August 23, 1933 and the meeting of Jewish doctors with Händiges:

  • April 1: Nazi leadership staged a one-day economic boycott of Jewish-owned businesses and professionals, including Jewish doctors and lawyers, with SA [storm trooper] or SS men blocking the entrances to Jewish businesses with signs such as “Avoid Jewish doctors” and “Jews are our misfortune.” In smaller cities like Elbing, store owners soon hung signs in their windows stating “Jews would not be served”.
  • April 5: the local Elbing newspaper reported “the disbarring of Jewish lawyers in Elbing,” and that city council decided to “‘aryanize’ the names of streets, factories, shops across the city” (note 10).
  • April 7: the Nazi regime passed the “Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service,” which barred “non-Aryans” from civil service positions (teachers, professors, judges, etc.). Later that year restrictions were placed on reimbursements to Jewish doctors from state health insurance funds (note 11).
  • July: Hitler donated RM 1,000 for the aid organization “Brothers in Need”—among his first official acts (note 12). It was chaired by the German Red Cross with Unruh on its board. This was the fund that had supported the Mennonite refugees.
  • August 22: Händiges met with Dr. med. Lauter
  • August 23: Händiges wrote Unruh about sending doctors to Fernheim
  • August 25: Unruh penned his vigorous opposition
  • August 25-26: An extraordinary session of Prussian Mennonite elders [lead ministers] and preachers met, with Händiges as co-chair. Unruh was a participant; proceedings included greetings to the new German government from Mennonites in Paraguay. A closing address was made by Otto Andres, a high ranking Nazi Party member and representative (Landrat) to the
    Danzig Parliament. Notably Andres was a member of the Tiegenhof Mennonite Church in West Prussia. In uniform, Andres told delegates in no uncertain terms that historic Mennonite non-resistance was not only a non-starter for government officials, but the ideal was also hopelessly out of touch with the Mennonite youth and inappropriate to German national revival (note 13).

Within a few weeks Unruh became contributing a patron of the SS (note 14). Perhaps Unruh's negative response should have been obvious to Pastor Händiges. But he and the Jewish doctors were convinced for the moment that God might be leading for the benefit of many in terrible times. Yet with Unruh’s opposition, the plan did not go forward (continued; note 15).

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Jacob H. Janzen to Dr. Lincke, Deutsches Auslandinstitut, Stuttgart, July 9, 1938. From National Archives and Records Administration, College Park, Maryland, T-81/606, “Nazi Party and the Deutsches Ausland-Institut.” On the epidemic, see previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/what-does-it-cost-to-settle-refugee.html.

Note 2: Janzen to Lincke, Deutsches Auslandinstitut, Stuttgart, July 9, 1938.

Note 3: Helena Janzen Fast (1902-1946), Fernheim, Paraguay, to Justina Riediger Fast (b. 1859), Manitoba, May 28, 1933.

Note 4: Peter Klassen, “Bericht aus der Mennoniten-Kolonie Fernheim im Gran Chaco von Paraguay, Südamerika,” Rosenort, January 1934, Mennonitische Blätter 81, no. 3 (March 1934) 28-29; 29, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25861/edition/24789/content.

Note 5: B. H. Unruh to P.C. Hiebert, O. Miller and H. Bender, August 3, 1936, letter, MCC-Akron, MCC CPS and other Corr. 1931-39, file 1. On Unruh, see my essay: “Benjamin Unruh, MCC and National Socialism,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 96, no. 2 (April 2022), 157-205, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1571.

Note 6: Emil Händiges to Benjamin H. Unruh, August 23, 1933, Mennonitische Forschungsstellte, Bolanden-Weierhof, Nachlaß Otto Schowalter, Folder: Korrespondenz 1929-1945.

Note 7: Emil Händiges, Mennonitsche Blätter 76, no. 12 (December 1929), 106, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25832/edition/24763/.

Note 8: Cf. https://www.xn--jdische-gemeinden-22b.de/index.php/gemeinden/e-g/553-elbing-westpreussen.

Note 9: Benjamin Unruh to Emil Händiges, August 25, letter, Mennonitische Forschungsstellte, Bolanden-Weierhof, Nachlaß Otto Schowalter, Folder: Korrespondenz 1929-1945.

Note 10: Cf. “The demise of the Elbing Synagogue and Jewish Community,” http://www.many-roads.com/2016/06/11/demise-of-the-elbing-synagogue-and-jewish-community/.

Note 11: Cf. European Observatory on Health Care Systems, “Health Care Systems in Transition: Germany,” 2000, http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/80776/E68952.pdf.

Note 12: German Red Cross President to the Reich Chancellor [Hitler], July 15, 1933, “Die deutschstämmigen Kolonisten in Rußland,” R 43-I/141, 192, from Bundesarchiv (387/ 419), https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/MHAKBMYV6ZD27I6VU7HVWD7PPW2ZCFMM. Cf. e.g., Ewald Ammende, “Eine Pflicht der Nation. Zur Tragödie des Rußlanddeutschtums,” Rigaschen Rundschau, Erste Beilage, no. 54 (March 8, 1934): 5, http://periodika.lv/periodika2-viewer/?lang=fr#panel:pp|issue:241202|page:5. Cf. N-S Presseanweisungen der Vorkriegszeit I, 1933, edited by Gabriele Toepser-Ziegert (New York: Saur, 1984), 45.

Note 13: “Zur Kirchenfrage der Mennoniten. Bericht über die außerordentliche Zusammenkunft der Vorstände der Ost- und Westpreußischen und Freistaat-Danziger Mennonitengemeinden zu Kalthof am 25. August 1933,” Mennonitische Blätter 80, no. 9 (September 1933), 91, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25854/edition/24783.

Note 14: Benjamin H. Unruh, “Fragebogen zur Bearbeitung des Aufnahmeantrages für die Reichsschriftumskammer.” On this application form for admission to the Reich Chamber of Literature, dated October 7, 1937, he lists his patron SS membership number as no. 168.232 (from Mennonite Library Archive—Bethel College, MS 416. https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_416/unruh_harder_quiring_berlin_docs/SKMBT_C35108031809530_0002.jpg). Unruh also highlights his SS patron membership in a 1940 letter to a government official (Benjamin H. Unruh to SS-Hauptsturmführer Walther Kolrep, January 30, 1940, p. 2, letter, from MLA-B, MS 295, folder 13, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_295/folder_13/SKMBT_C35107061214280_0003.jpg.

Note 15: For continuation, see post (forthcoming).

Print Friendly and PDF

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...
Post a Comment
Read more

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1921: Formation of the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine”

Famine was imminent; unprecedented drought; taxes and requisitions exceeded what was harvested; some villages had no horses; extortion and arrests were widespread; many men were disenfranchised and barred from village affairs (see note 1 ). Lenin responded with the 1921 “New Economic Policy” (NEP), which allowed for a degree of market flexibility within the context of socialism to ward off complete economic collapse. A fixed-tax was imposed, grain quotas were eased, farmers were allowed a small amount of land and could sell excess produce at free-market prices after taxes had been paid. Much was in the air. In secret talks, Soviet Trade Commissar Leonid Krasin told the head of the Eastern Section in the German Foreign Office, Gustav Behrendt, that the USSR was “prepared—just like Catherine the Great of old—to call hundreds of thousands of German colonists into the land and transfer them to large, closed complexes for settlement,” especially in Turkestan and the North Caucasus, be...
Post a Comment
Read more

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...
Post a Comment
Read more

Molotschna Elder Heinrich Dirks and tensions with Mennonite Brethren

Russian Mennonites were not always kind to each other—and nowhere is this seen better than in the tensions between “old” Mennonites and the “separatist” Mennonite Brethren, who had their beginnings in Gnadenfeld, Molotschna in 1860. Heinrich Dirks (1842-1915) was the first Russian Mennonite overseas missionary and later long-time Gnadenfeld, Molotschna ( note 1 ). Everything about Dirks’ life suggests that he would have joined the Brethren in 1860. He too was influenced by the "powerful and gripping” conversionist ministry of Eduard Wüst in his youth. Dirks was a young adult in the Gnadenfeld congregation in South Russia where the Mennonite Brethren /separatist movement began. Shortly thereafter, he was trained in the German pietist Barmen Mission School (1863-67), and famously travelled to Sumatra (Indonesia) where he started a mission outpost and school. The Mennonite Brethren too would later connect the global mission imperative with the impending return of Christ as did Dirk...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Mennonite Agencies withdraw support from star player: Benjamin Unruh, 1938

In 1938 Mennonite Central Committee took the decision to significantly reduce their support of Benjamin Unruh’s work in Germany as of August 1, and Dutch Mennonites announced the same effective January 1, 1939. What to do? Ask the Nazi Party and government agencies to make up the difference ( note 1 )! On December 3, 1938, Unruh made the following pitch: “Germany generously and magnanimously helped our [Mennonite] organizations, on my intercession, to overcome the manifold difficulties connected with such a large movement of people [beginning 1923] in such critical times. ... The fact that finally all Mennonite synodal and national associations formally appointed me as their representative in the field of Russian-German welfare (Fürsorge), had its deeper reason especially in the success of my activity in Germany. … You see that I stand in the center of the global Mennonite [relief] work. However, I have always done this as a German man and not only as a representative of my denominat...
Post a Comment
Read more