Skip to main content

"No Jewish Doctors Wanted" (I): Prof. Unruh and Fernheim's need, 1933

A deadly epidemic broke out in MCC’s new settlement in Fernheim, Paraguay in 1930. Settlers had been present for less than a year, and had recorded 20 births and 88 deaths by December 31 (note 1).

Health care remained a significant concern in Fernheim even after the epidemic was halted with the emergency medical intervention of Paraguayan military doctors. Mennonites were wholly responsible for their own health care. In 1933 and 1934 there was a malaria outbreak with 31 deaths and 30 deaths respectively, compared to 11 deaths in 1932 (note 2). My father born in 1932 almost did not survive 1933: "He is very thin. It often seems to me that we will not be able to keep him by our side. He was such a happy and lively boy, but the illness has gone so far," my grandmother wrote family in Canada (note 3).

Early in 1934 the Fernheim Colony reported in the Germany Mennonite denominational paper that “the state of health leaves much to be desired. Malaria still hits the villages back and forth. Some are literally languishing with this disease.” The writer asks speculatively and reports a rumour: “Will we have a doctor among us soon? Preacher Isaak who is the head of the hospital told me the other day that a certain Mr. Fast from the Island of Java had agreed to come to Paraguay” (note 4).

By 1936 Fernheim’s mentor and liaison with the German government, Prof. Benjamin Unruh understood their failure. In a letter to his MCC colleagues he wrote that they had “experimented with three doctors. The first two were bad drinkers, the last young and inexperienced. ... In my opinion, it is a great defect of the settlement that there is no proper doctor there” (note 5).

However what Unruh does not mention is that in August 1933 he personally and vigorously rejected the opportunity to bring three distinguished Jewish doctors to the colony from West Prussia—one a friend of Vereinigung denominational chair Emil Händiges, pastor and elder of the Elbing Mennonite Church. The doctors were seeking to flee Hitler’s new Germany in August 1933.


A recently uncovered set of letters between Unruh and Händiges reveals the details of that decision.

August 23, 1933—Elbing Elder Emil Händiges had hardly slept. It seemed like one of those rare but obvious answers to prayer. Three outstanding Elbing Jewish medical doctors (including a couple, husband and wife doctors) were prepared to leave Germany immediately and set up their practices in Fernheim, Paraguay.

Händiges wrote to his colleague Unruh with the news:

“… They turned to me as the Elder of the Mennonites, a denomination that has experienced twists of fate in its history similar to theirs. 'We are not afraid of the wild Chaco … if only we are not rejected because we are Jews and if only we can continue to practice our profession in peace. We do not care about making money, if we can only live our lives and breathe freely again, especially in consideration of our children,"—this is what Dr. Lauter said to me almost verbatim in our conversation yesterday. Therefore, dear Benjamin, ... consider if this is not one of the very rare occasions where God wants to bring together people from different camps in order to help both parts according to His miraculous counsel, which we were allowed to experience so often in the [relief work] matters of “Brothers in need.” (Note 6)

There were some 600 Jews in Elbing prior to the Hitler regime (1933 to 1945). In 1929 the local Jewish synagogue helped raise funds for Mennonite refugees through “Brothers in Need,” which supported those rescued from Moscow in 1929 and temporarily housed in Germany (note 7). Many of these Mennonites went on to Paraguay with the basic tools, household utensils, and implements purchased with in Germany with that aid.


Now the Elbing Jewish community was in need, and Händiges was visited by one of “the most outstanding Jewish physicians in our city.” Mennonites and Jews in Elbing had shared a long, common story as a minority disadvantaged group, historically together on the outside edges of the city (note 8). The synagogue and the church were in short walking distance from each other.


Unruh received the letter but rejected the idea out of hand—the response was immediate and unequivocal (note 9).

Below is a timeline of events leading to August 23, 1933 and the meeting of Jewish doctors with Händiges:

  • April 1: Nazi leadership staged a one-day economic boycott of Jewish-owned businesses and professionals, including Jewish doctors and lawyers, with SA [storm trooper] or SS men blocking the entrances to Jewish businesses with signs such as “Avoid Jewish doctors” and “Jews are our misfortune.” In smaller cities like Elbing, store owners soon hung signs in their windows stating “Jews would not be served”.
  • April 5: the local Elbing newspaper reported “the disbarring of Jewish lawyers in Elbing,” and that city council decided to “‘aryanize’ the names of streets, factories, shops across the city” (note 10).
  • April 7: the Nazi regime passed the “Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service,” which barred “non-Aryans” from civil service positions (teachers, professors, judges, etc.). Later that year restrictions were placed on reimbursements to Jewish doctors from state health insurance funds (note 11).
  • July: Hitler donated RM 1,000 for the aid organization “Brothers in Need”—among his first official acts (note 12). It was chaired by the German Red Cross with Unruh on its board. This was the fund that had supported the Mennonite refugees.
  • August 22: Händiges met with Dr. med. Lauter
  • August 23: Händiges wrote Unruh about sending doctors to Fernheim
  • August 25: Unruh penned his vigorous opposition
  • August 25-26: An extraordinary session of Prussian Mennonite elders [lead ministers] and preachers met, with Händiges as co-chair. Unruh was a participant; proceedings included greetings to the new German government from Mennonites in Paraguay. A closing address was made by Otto Andres, a high ranking Nazi Party member and representative (Landrat) to the
    Danzig Parliament. Notably Andres was a member of the Tiegenhof Mennonite Church in West Prussia. In uniform, Andres told delegates in no uncertain terms that historic Mennonite non-resistance was not only a non-starter for government officials, but the ideal was also hopelessly out of touch with the Mennonite youth and inappropriate to German national revival (note 13).

Within a few weeks Unruh became contributing a patron of the SS (note 14). Perhaps Unruh's negative response should have been obvious to Pastor Händiges. But he and the Jewish doctors were convinced for the moment that God might be leading for the benefit of many in terrible times. Yet with Unruh’s opposition, the plan did not go forward (continued; note 15).

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Jacob H. Janzen to Dr. Lincke, Deutsches Auslandinstitut, Stuttgart, July 9, 1938. From National Archives and Records Administration, College Park, Maryland, T-81/606, “Nazi Party and the Deutsches Ausland-Institut.” On the epidemic, see previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/what-does-it-cost-to-settle-refugee.html.

Note 2: Janzen to Lincke, Deutsches Auslandinstitut, Stuttgart, July 9, 1938.

Note 3: Helena Janzen Fast (1902-1946), Fernheim, Paraguay, to Justina Riediger Fast (b. 1859), Manitoba, May 28, 1933.

Note 4: Peter Klassen, “Bericht aus der Mennoniten-Kolonie Fernheim im Gran Chaco von Paraguay, Südamerika,” Rosenort, January 1934, Mennonitische Blätter 81, no. 3 (March 1934) 28-29; 29, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25861/edition/24789/content.

Note 5: B. H. Unruh to P.C. Hiebert, O. Miller and H. Bender, August 3, 1936, letter, MCC-Akron, MCC CPS and other Corr. 1931-39, file 1. On Unruh, see my essay: “Benjamin Unruh, MCC and National Socialism,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 96, no. 2 (April 2022), 157-205, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1571.

Note 6: Emil Händiges to Benjamin H. Unruh, August 23, 1933, Mennonitische Forschungsstellte, Bolanden-Weierhof, Nachlaß Otto Schowalter, Folder: Korrespondenz 1929-1945.

Note 7: Emil Händiges, Mennonitsche Blätter 76, no. 12 (December 1929), 106, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25832/edition/24763/.

Note 8: Cf. https://www.xn--jdische-gemeinden-22b.de/index.php/gemeinden/e-g/553-elbing-westpreussen.

Note 9: Benjamin Unruh to Emil Händiges, August 25, letter, Mennonitische Forschungsstellte, Bolanden-Weierhof, Nachlaß Otto Schowalter, Folder: Korrespondenz 1929-1945.

Note 10: Cf. “The demise of the Elbing Synagogue and Jewish Community,” http://www.many-roads.com/2016/06/11/demise-of-the-elbing-synagogue-and-jewish-community/.

Note 11: Cf. European Observatory on Health Care Systems, “Health Care Systems in Transition: Germany,” 2000, http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/80776/E68952.pdf.

Note 12: German Red Cross President to the Reich Chancellor [Hitler], July 15, 1933, “Die deutschstämmigen Kolonisten in Rußland,” R 43-I/141, 192, from Bundesarchiv (387/ 419), https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/MHAKBMYV6ZD27I6VU7HVWD7PPW2ZCFMM. Cf. e.g., Ewald Ammende, “Eine Pflicht der Nation. Zur Tragödie des Rußlanddeutschtums,” Rigaschen Rundschau, Erste Beilage, no. 54 (March 8, 1934): 5, http://periodika.lv/periodika2-viewer/?lang=fr#panel:pp|issue:241202|page:5. Cf. N-S Presseanweisungen der Vorkriegszeit I, 1933, edited by Gabriele Toepser-Ziegert (New York: Saur, 1984), 45.

Note 13: “Zur Kirchenfrage der Mennoniten. Bericht über die außerordentliche Zusammenkunft der Vorstände der Ost- und Westpreußischen und Freistaat-Danziger Mennonitengemeinden zu Kalthof am 25. August 1933,” Mennonitische Blätter 80, no. 9 (September 1933), 91, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25854/edition/24783.

Note 14: Benjamin H. Unruh, “Fragebogen zur Bearbeitung des Aufnahmeantrages für die Reichsschriftumskammer.” On this application form for admission to the Reich Chamber of Literature, dated October 7, 1937, he lists his patron SS membership number as no. 168.232 (from Mennonite Library Archive—Bethel College, MS 416. https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_416/unruh_harder_quiring_berlin_docs/SKMBT_C35108031809530_0002.jpg). Unruh also highlights his SS patron membership in a 1940 letter to a government official (Benjamin H. Unruh to SS-Hauptsturmführer Walther Kolrep, January 30, 1940, p. 2, letter, from MLA-B, MS 295, folder 13, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_295/folder_13/SKMBT_C35107061214280_0003.jpg.

Note 15: For continuation, see post (forthcoming).

Print Friendly and PDF
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...
Post a Comment
Read more

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...
Post a Comment
Read more

"In the Case of Extreme Danger" - Menno Pass and Refugee crisis, 1945-46

"In the Case of Extreme Danger 1. We are Russian-Mennonite refugees who are returning to Holland, the place of origin. The language is Low German. 2. The Dutch Mennonites there, Doopsgezinde , will take in all fellow-believing Mennonites from Russia who are in danger of compulsory repatriation. 3. The first stage of the journey is to Gronau in Westphalia. 4. As a precaution, purchase a ticket to an intermediate stop first. The last connecting station is Rheine. 5. Opposite Gronau is the Dutch city of Enschede, where you will cross the border. 6. On the border ask for Peter Dyck (Piter Daik), Mennonite Central Committee, Amsterdam, Singel 452. Peter Dyck (or his people) will distribute the relevant papers—“Menno Passes”--and provide further information. 7. Any other border points may also be crossed, with the necessary explanations (who, where to, Mennonites from Russia, Peter Dyck, M.C.C., etc.). The Dutch border Patrol is informed. 8. Here the whole matter must be h...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Motherhood of the People": Halbstadt Midwife Helene Berg and the SS

Recently Benjamin Goossen posted an important piece on the “well-known” Halbstadt midwife Helene Berg. Reichsführer SS Heinrich Himmler had taken a special interest in “old Mrs. Berg” and had publicly recognized her for helping birth some 8,000 Volksdeutsche (ethnic German) babies ( note 1 ). Goossen and I have shared archival materials in the past years. Below I would like to continue the exploration of Taunte Bojsche (or "Aunt Berg") and the surprisingly broad interest in her by Nazi officials as icon. I begin with a family story as a window onto the times. Some 35,000 Mennonites were evacuated out of German-occupied Ukraine in Fall 1943. After a grueling trek west the survivors landed in German-annexed Wartheland (previously Poland) where they were naturalized as German citizens. My grandmother Helene Bräul had eight children, and Helene Berg may very well have been her midwife for one or more of them. Like many Mennonite mothers in Wartheland, my grandmother was ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß";  note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...
Post a Comment
Read more