Skip to main content

"No Jewish Doctors Wanted" (I): Prof. Unruh and Fernheim's need, 1933

A deadly epidemic broke out in MCC’s new settlement in Fernheim, Paraguay in 1930. Settlers had been present for less than a year, and had recorded 20 births and 88 deaths by December 31 (note 1).

Health care remained a significant concern in Fernheim even after the epidemic was halted with the emergency medical intervention of Paraguayan military doctors. Mennonites were wholly responsible for their own health care. In 1933 and 1934 there was a malaria outbreak with 31 deaths and 30 deaths respectively, compared to 11 deaths in 1932 (note 2). My father born in 1932 almost did not survive 1933: "He is very thin. It often seems to me that we will not be able to keep him by our side. He was such a happy and lively boy, but the illness has gone so far," my grandmother wrote family in Canada (note 3).

Early in 1934 the Fernheim Colony reported in the Germany Mennonite denominational paper that “the state of health leaves much to be desired. Malaria still hits the villages back and forth. Some are literally languishing with this disease.” The writer asks speculatively and reports a rumour: “Will we have a doctor among us soon? Preacher Isaak who is the head of the hospital told me the other day that a certain Mr. Fast from the Island of Java had agreed to come to Paraguay” (note 4).

By 1936 Fernheim’s mentor and liaison with the German government, Prof. Benjamin Unruh understood their failure. In a letter to his MCC colleagues he wrote that they had “experimented with three doctors. The first two were bad drinkers, the last young and inexperienced. ... In my opinion, it is a great defect of the settlement that there is no proper doctor there” (note 5).

However what Unruh does not mention is that in August 1933 he personally and vigorously rejected the opportunity to bring three distinguished Jewish doctors to the colony from West Prussia—one a friend of Vereinigung denominational chair Emil Händiges, pastor and elder of the Elbing Mennonite Church. The doctors were seeking to flee Hitler’s new Germany in August 1933.


A recently uncovered set of letters between Unruh and Händiges reveals the details of that decision.

August 23, 1933—Elbing Elder Emil Händiges had hardly slept. It seemed like one of those rare but obvious answers to prayer. Three outstanding Elbing Jewish medical doctors (including a couple, husband and wife doctors) were prepared to leave Germany immediately and set up their practices in Fernheim, Paraguay.

Händiges wrote to his colleague Unruh with the news:

“… They turned to me as the Elder of the Mennonites, a denomination that has experienced twists of fate in its history similar to theirs. 'We are not afraid of the wild Chaco … if only we are not rejected because we are Jews and if only we can continue to practice our profession in peace. We do not care about making money, if we can only live our lives and breathe freely again, especially in consideration of our children,"—this is what Dr. Lauter said to me almost verbatim in our conversation yesterday. Therefore, dear Benjamin, ... consider if this is not one of the very rare occasions where God wants to bring together people from different camps in order to help both parts according to His miraculous counsel, which we were allowed to experience so often in the [relief work] matters of “Brothers in need.” (Note 6)

There were some 600 Jews in Elbing prior to the Hitler regime (1933 to 1945). In 1929 the local Jewish synagogue helped raise funds for Mennonite refugees through “Brothers in Need,” which supported those rescued from Moscow in 1929 and temporarily housed in Germany (note 7). Many of these Mennonites went on to Paraguay with the basic tools, household utensils, and implements purchased with in Germany with that aid.


Now the Elbing Jewish community was in need, and Händiges was visited by one of “the most outstanding Jewish physicians in our city.” Mennonites and Jews in Elbing had shared a long, common story as a minority disadvantaged group, historically together on the outside edges of the city (note 8). The synagogue and the church were in short walking distance from each other.


Unruh received the letter but rejected the idea out of hand—the response was immediate and unequivocal (note 9).

Below is a timeline of events leading to August 23, 1933 and the meeting of Jewish doctors with Händiges:

  • April 1: Nazi leadership staged a one-day economic boycott of Jewish-owned businesses and professionals, including Jewish doctors and lawyers, with SA [storm trooper] or SS men blocking the entrances to Jewish businesses with signs such as “Avoid Jewish doctors” and “Jews are our misfortune.” In smaller cities like Elbing, store owners soon hung signs in their windows stating “Jews would not be served”.
  • April 5: the local Elbing newspaper reported “the disbarring of Jewish lawyers in Elbing,” and that city council decided to “‘aryanize’ the names of streets, factories, shops across the city” (note 10).
  • April 7: the Nazi regime passed the “Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service,” which barred “non-Aryans” from civil service positions (teachers, professors, judges, etc.). Later that year restrictions were placed on reimbursements to Jewish doctors from state health insurance funds (note 11).
  • July: Hitler donated RM 1,000 for the aid organization “Brothers in Need”—among his first official acts (note 12). It was chaired by the German Red Cross with Unruh on its board. This was the fund that had supported the Mennonite refugees.
  • August 22: Händiges met with Dr. med. Lauter
  • August 23: Händiges wrote Unruh about sending doctors to Fernheim
  • August 25: Unruh penned his vigorous opposition
  • August 25-26: An extraordinary session of Prussian Mennonite elders [lead ministers] and preachers met, with Händiges as co-chair. Unruh was a participant; proceedings included greetings to the new German government from Mennonites in Paraguay. A closing address was made by Otto Andres, a high ranking Nazi Party member and representative (Landrat) to the
    Danzig Parliament. Notably Andres was a member of the Tiegenhof Mennonite Church in West Prussia. In uniform, Andres told delegates in no uncertain terms that historic Mennonite non-resistance was not only a non-starter for government officials, but the ideal was also hopelessly out of touch with the Mennonite youth and inappropriate to German national revival (note 13).

Within a few weeks Unruh became contributing a patron of the SS (note 14). Perhaps Unruh's negative response should have been obvious to Pastor Händiges. But he and the Jewish doctors were convinced for the moment that God might be leading for the benefit of many in terrible times. Yet with Unruh’s opposition, the plan did not go forward (continued; note 15).

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Jacob H. Janzen to Dr. Lincke, Deutsches Auslandinstitut, Stuttgart, July 9, 1938. From National Archives and Records Administration, College Park, Maryland, T-81/606, “Nazi Party and the Deutsches Ausland-Institut.” On the epidemic, see previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/what-does-it-cost-to-settle-refugee.html.

Note 2: Janzen to Lincke, Deutsches Auslandinstitut, Stuttgart, July 9, 1938.

Note 3: Helena Janzen Fast (1902-1946), Fernheim, Paraguay, to Justina Riediger Fast (b. 1859), Manitoba, May 28, 1933.

Note 4: Peter Klassen, “Bericht aus der Mennoniten-Kolonie Fernheim im Gran Chaco von Paraguay, Südamerika,” Rosenort, January 1934, Mennonitische Blätter 81, no. 3 (March 1934) 28-29; 29, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25861/edition/24789/content.

Note 5: B. H. Unruh to P.C. Hiebert, O. Miller and H. Bender, August 3, 1936, letter, MCC-Akron, MCC CPS and other Corr. 1931-39, file 1. On Unruh, see my essay: “Benjamin Unruh, MCC and National Socialism,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 96, no. 2 (April 2022), 157-205, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1571.

Note 6: Emil Händiges to Benjamin H. Unruh, August 23, 1933, Mennonitische Forschungsstellte, Bolanden-Weierhof, Nachlaß Otto Schowalter, Folder: Korrespondenz 1929-1945.

Note 7: Emil Händiges, Mennonitsche Blätter 76, no. 12 (December 1929), 106, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25832/edition/24763/.

Note 8: Cf. https://www.xn--jdische-gemeinden-22b.de/index.php/gemeinden/e-g/553-elbing-westpreussen.

Note 9: Benjamin Unruh to Emil Händiges, August 25, letter, Mennonitische Forschungsstellte, Bolanden-Weierhof, Nachlaß Otto Schowalter, Folder: Korrespondenz 1929-1945.

Note 10: Cf. “The demise of the Elbing Synagogue and Jewish Community,” http://www.many-roads.com/2016/06/11/demise-of-the-elbing-synagogue-and-jewish-community/.

Note 11: Cf. European Observatory on Health Care Systems, “Health Care Systems in Transition: Germany,” 2000, http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/80776/E68952.pdf.

Note 12: German Red Cross President to the Reich Chancellor [Hitler], July 15, 1933, “Die deutschstämmigen Kolonisten in Rußland,” R 43-I/141, 192, from Bundesarchiv (387/ 419), https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/MHAKBMYV6ZD27I6VU7HVWD7PPW2ZCFMM. Cf. e.g., Ewald Ammende, “Eine Pflicht der Nation. Zur Tragödie des Rußlanddeutschtums,” Rigaschen Rundschau, Erste Beilage, no. 54 (March 8, 1934): 5, http://periodika.lv/periodika2-viewer/?lang=fr#panel:pp|issue:241202|page:5. Cf. N-S Presseanweisungen der Vorkriegszeit I, 1933, edited by Gabriele Toepser-Ziegert (New York: Saur, 1984), 45.

Note 13: “Zur Kirchenfrage der Mennoniten. Bericht über die außerordentliche Zusammenkunft der Vorstände der Ost- und Westpreußischen und Freistaat-Danziger Mennonitengemeinden zu Kalthof am 25. August 1933,” Mennonitische Blätter 80, no. 9 (September 1933), 91, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25854/edition/24783.

Note 14: Benjamin H. Unruh, “Fragebogen zur Bearbeitung des Aufnahmeantrages für die Reichsschriftumskammer.” On this application form for admission to the Reich Chamber of Literature, dated October 7, 1937, he lists his patron SS membership number as no. 168.232 (from Mennonite Library Archive—Bethel College, MS 416. https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_416/unruh_harder_quiring_berlin_docs/SKMBT_C35108031809530_0002.jpg). Unruh also highlights his SS patron membership in a 1940 letter to a government official (Benjamin H. Unruh to SS-Hauptsturmführer Walther Kolrep, January 30, 1940, p. 2, letter, from MLA-B, MS 295, folder 13, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_295/folder_13/SKMBT_C35107061214280_0003.jpg.

Note 15: For continuation, see post (forthcoming).

Print Friendly and PDF
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...
Post a Comment
Read more

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vaccinations in Chortitza and Molotschna, beginning in 1804

Vaccination lists for Chortitza Mennonite children in 1809 and 1814 were published prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with little curiosity ( note 1 ). However during the 2020-22 pandemic and in a context in which some refused to vaccinate for religious belief, the historic data took on new significance. Ancestors of some of the more conservative Russian Mennonite groups—like the Reinländer or the Bergthalers or the adult children of land delegate Jacob Höppner—were in fact vaccinating their infants and toddlers against small pox over two hundred years ago ( note 2 ). Also before the current pandemic Ukrainian historian Dmytro Myeshkov brought to light other archival materials on Mennonites and vaccination. The material below is my summary and translation of the relevant pages of Myeshkov’s massive 2008 volume on Black Sea German and their Worlds, 1781 to 1871 (German only; note 3 ). Myeshkov confirms that Chortitza was already immunizing its children in 1804 when their District Offic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Molotschna: The final months, Summer 1943

These photos are from German propaganda material filmed in Molotschna (called "Halbstadt") in 1943—just a few months before the evacuation from Ukraine and trek to German-annexed Poland (Warthegau). Not all of the film is of the Mennonite settlement, however, but much of it is. Below are some frames from the film. The edited shorter version is of higher quality and designed as propaganda to be consumed by Germans in the Reich and to secure their approval .  The scenes are marked by cleanliness, orderliness and discipline. There is economic activity, a model Kindergarten, and always happy ethnic German people in the newly occupied territories. A predominantly Mennonite Cavalry Regiment (Waffen-SS) guarding Ukrainian and Russian workers is also highlighted. This hard to see and disturbing. Anything that may have been good here for Mennonites meant enslavement, hunger and death for untold numbers of others. Two versions of the film are available: Shorter (edited for l...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flemish Anabaptists and Witch Hunts

Political leaders have long used the term "witch hunt"--and there is an historical connection to Mennonites. Anabaptists and so-called “witches” were arrested and tried for related reasons in the Low Countries in the 1500s: namely, as a means to divert God’s wrath. The late-Medievals feared that heresy—in this case ana-baptism and the challenge to other sacraments—invited the wrath of God, and was an instrument for the devil’s own hellish apocalyptic assault. The assumption: the devil's tactics to destroy Christendom included the use of both heretics and sorcerers. Gary Waite writes convincingly that both were seen as “polluting” the community and thus both had to be "excised." "This fear of pollution, or scandalizing God or the saints, also explains why small numbers of peaceable Mennonites were so harshly treated during the second half of the sixteenth century. Plagues, fires, and economic and social crises were often blamed on the presence of even a smal...
Post a Comment
Read more

1923 Mennonite immigrants "kept behind": Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp

An important part of the larger 1923 immigration story includes the chapter of the hundreds who were held back at Riga and Southampton and taken to the Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp for medical care. “Germany generously and magnanimously helped our organizations, on my intercession, to overcome the manifold difficulties connected with such a ( Volksbewegung ) movement of people in such critical times,” Benjamin H. Unruh wrote some years later ( note 1 ). Just as the first group of Russländer Mennonites set foot in Canada 100 years ago this month, the North American relief effort in the USSR was also winding down (August 1923). The famine relief work in 1921 and 1922 had found broad support in the North American Mennonite community. However excitement about a larger immigration of Russian Mennonites to North America was muted, and a new call to action could not forge the same level of cooperation across Mennonite groups. The plan required huge money guarantees. In USSR B.B. Janz h...
Post a Comment
Read more

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...
Post a Comment
Read more

More Royal News! Mennonites give gifts of “Oxen, Butter, Ducks, Hens & Cheese” to new King (1772)

What do Mennonites offer a new king? The ritual ceremonies of homage to a new European king—as we see on TV these days--are ancient. Exactly 250 years yesterday, Frederick the Great became king over Mennonites in the Vistula River Delta where most of our ancestors lived. Here is how that played out. On May 31, 1772, Heinrich Donner was elected elder of the Orlofferfelde Mennonite Church, 25 km north of Marienburg Castle in Polish-Prussia; thankfully he kept a diary ( note 1 ). Only a few months later the weak Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth collapsed and was partitioned by powerful, land-hungry neighbours: Austria, Prussia and Catherine the Great’s empire. In the preceding decades Mennonites had lived with significant autonomy, felt secure under the Polish crown and could appeal to the king for protection . Now some 2,638 Mennonite families were under Prussian rule. Frederick II took possession of his new lands on September 13, and then invited four persons of nobility plus clergy from ...
Post a Comment
Read more

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...
Post a Comment
Read more