Skip to main content

What does it cost to settle a Refugee? Basic without Medical Care (1930)

In January 1930, the Mennonite Central Committee was scrambling to get 3,885 Mennonites out of Germany and settled somewhere fast. These refugees had fled via Moscow in December 1929, and Germany was willing only to serve as first transit stop (note 1).

Canada was very reluctant to take any German-speaking Mennonites—the Great Depression had begun and a negative memory of war resistance still lingered. In the end Canada took 1,344 Mennonites and the USA took none born in Russia. Paraguay was the next best option (note 2). The German government preferred Brazil, but Brazil would not guarantee freedom from military service, which was a problem for American Mennonite financiers.

There were already some conservative "cousins" from Manitoba in Paraguay who had negotiated with the government and learned through trial and error how to survive in the "Green Hell" of the Paraguayan Chaco.

MCC with the assistance of a German aid organization purchased and distributed basics for each new family / village to be equipped with the following upon settlement (see pic):


It was a huge undertaking. MCC estimated the costs to settle each family exclusive of transportation and land, would be a little more than $600. The biggest organizational failure was lack of medical care, and the first families suffered immediate losses. And the quality of oxen (for ploughing) and cows—upon which so much hinged—looked much better on paper than the animals that were in fact rounded up.

1,572 Mennonites from Russia were settled by MCC in the Paraguayan Chaco, and another 2,529 settled in Brazil in 1930 (note 3). Each family settled in Paraguay was indebted $1500 (average) for travel expenses, 40 hectares of land, and the cost of equipment (note 4).

There were already Conservative Mennonites from Canada (Sommerfelder) in the Chaco, who had suffered a very high mortality rate upon settlement. Nevertheless MCC chose not to place a medical doctor in the colony; they were satisfied with a settler who had homeopathic training. An epidemic broke out in the first few months after arrival in Paraguay, and tragically took more than 94 lives (note 5).

Homeopathic doctor Johann Ediger was a close friend of immigration leader Prof. Benjamin Unruh, and wrote a year earlier about the Canadian Mennonites: “An important reason that frightens the Mennonites away from Chaco, is the high mortality amongst the settlers, and it will be one of my first problems to investigate the reasons, and satisfactorily enlighten the settlers through lectures on prevention and homeopathic self-treatment” (note 6).

Ediger had only taken one course in medicine; he did not complete it or graduate with a degree, and was “not in any way a qualified as a doctor,” according to a reference check with a Mennonite medical doctor from Russia in 1929 (note 7 and 8).

In the first months of the Fernheim settlement Ediger reported giving “remedies” to those from Moscow via Germany who “had brought cases of diarrhea with them from the big ship” (note 9). By the end of November 1930 the epidemic was in full-swing and Ediger was overwhelmed (note 10). Unruh in Germany however was both unconvinced and frustrated by the “rumours about a large-scale epidemic in Paraguay,” and trusted Ediger’s reassuring reports despite the “mention of frequent deaths” (note 11).

The cost for MCC to bring in emergency military  doctors was $58,466 (note 12). The lack of proper medical care and the judgement of Unruh in Germany would remain a significant problem for colony for the next years (note 13).








            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: See previous posts, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/canadian-mennonites-and-paraguay-1922.html; https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/lengua-indigenous-people-of-gran-chaco.html. On financial support from the German government negotiated by Benjamin H. Unruh, see my essay, "Benjamin Unruh, MCC and National Socialism," Mennonite Quarterly Review 96, no. 2 (April 2022), 157-205, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1571.

Note 2/ pic: Village 2, MCC-Akron IX-03-03, Box 4 File 34-Village 2 Contract (Partial) consolidated.

Note 3: Frank Epp, Mennonite Exodus (Altona, MB: Friesen, 1962), 239. For the work of MCC in this effort, cf. John D. Unruh, In the Name of Christ: A History of the Mennonite Central Committee and its Service 1920–1951 (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1952), 24–31.

Note 4: Cf. Peter P. Klassen, The Mennonites in Paraguay, vol. 1, trans. by Gunther H. Schmidt, 2nd ed. (Hillsboro, KS: Self-published, 2004), 75.

Note 5: Telegram, Harold S. Bender to Benjamin Unruh, 1930. Cf. B. Unruh, Report VI to MCC, January 14, 1930, 3. From MCC-Archives Akron, IX-03-02, box 1, file 1, 0005; Nicolai Siemens [report] to MCC, November 23, 1930. From MCC-Akron, IX 3-5 Box 1 File 1-0001.

Note 6: Johann Ediger to General S. McRoberts, letter, February 27, 1929, p. 2, MCC-Akron, IX3-3, Box 1, File 30.

Note 7: M. S. Fisher to H. G. Norman, letter, April 5, 1929, MCC-Akron, IX3-3, Box 1, File 30.

Note 8: M. S. Fisher to H. G. Norman, letter, June 4, 1929, MCC-Akron, IX3-3, Box 1, File 30.

Note 9: Johann Ediger to Benjamin Unruh, June 28, 1930, Report 8, MCC-Akron, 1X3-1, Box 1, Folder 3.

Note 10: [Intercontinental/Corporation] to MCC (M. Kratz), cable, November 28, 1930, MCC-Akron, IX2, Box 4, File 11-0003.

Note 11: Benjamin Unruh to MCC Executive, Report 20, November 30, 1930, p. 10, MCC-Akron, IX01-01, Box 11, File 6.

Note 12: MCC-Akron, IX 3-3, Box 11, File 26.

Note 13: See next posts (forthcoming)

Photograph: Death of Sarah Fast, October 27, 1930, age 4 (my aunt). Her mother Margareta, my grandfather Jacob Fast's first wife, died from the typhoid fever six weeks later.

Print Friendly and PDF


Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C