Skip to main content

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites.

The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 (note 1) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee (note 2). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration (note 3).

Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, a total exemption from individual service to the state was not an option for debate.

In Fall 1873 Mennonite delegates had hoped to meet with the Tsar himself but were unsuccessful. In their written petition of December 22, 1873, they articulated in no uncertain terms that the still unclear legislation “has unsettled our hearts to the utmost degree” because “we might lose an essential part of our confession of faith. … The matter is so serious and important,” they argued, it will determine “the continuing existence of our community.” The petition was made “in the name Lord Jesus Christ, who through our forefathers handed over to us a gospel of peace” (note 4).

The possibility of mass emigration was especially strong in the Bergthal and Chortitza Colonies, as well as among the Kleine Gemeinde in the Molotschna (note 5).

The axe finally fell on January 1, 1874 with the proclamation of the Universal Service Manifesto:

“[A] significant portion of Russian subjects are freed from the responsibility [of military service] that should be sacred for everyone in an equal measure. … Recent events have proven … that the strength of a state is not in the number of its troops alone, but is primarily in the moral and intellectual qualities of those troops. Those qualities only reach the highest stage of development when the business of defending the fatherland becomes the general affair of the people, when all, without distinction of title or status, unite for that holy cause.” (Note 6)

Paragraph 157 of the new law however granted Mennonites "exemption from service with arms," but obliged them "to serve in [army] workplaces and other institutions" (note 7).

Military reform was the capstone of major socio-political shifts in the late imperial period: military worth was no longer defined by socio-political privilege and title, but by professional military expertise; soldiers too were now to be conscripted individually “as citizens” rather than “en masse on an estate basis.” The reform was designed to fundamentally change—and westernize—the relationship of the individual to the state, with the intention “that military affairs would now become the task of the whole people” (note 8).

Not surprisingly, within three months of the Tsar’s proclamation, Mennonite emigration was in full swing.

As it became clear that Mennonites were not appeased by Paragraph 157, on April 10, 1874 the Tsar, who remembered the “commendable deeds” of the Mennonites during the Crimean campaign, commissioned his personal envoy (and friend of the Mennonites) General Adjutant Eduard Totleben to immediately travel and meet with the Mennonites and prevent a larger emigration (note 9). Upon his arrival in the region Totleben was petitioned by the nobility and merchant class for the same.

“To what extent the retention of the Mennonites in the Territory of New Russia is important can be seen from the fact that, on my arrival in to Ekaterinoslav, a deputation from the nobility and merchants explained to me that the emigration of the Mennonites would be accompanied by the most disastrous consequences for the entire south, because: 1) the Mennonites are advanced people in the economy, and in this respect 2) they are considered the best tenants of the landed estates. With the departure of the Mennonites all the lands in these provinces will fall by half their real value and will partly pass into the hands of the Jews [!], which will have the effect of ruining the landowners and causing a complete decline in regional agriculture. The same was repeatedly confirmed to me by the landowners from the land of the Don Cossaks, who are here in St. Petersburg.” (Note 10)

Over three weeks Totleben’s many explanations and demonstrations of the Tsar’s favour were repeatedly met “with quotes from the gospel and the dogmas of their confession” (note 11). Their “trust in the government had been greatly shaken,” and “having preserved all the provisions of their faith with inviolable severity, they are ready to sacrifice all earthly goods in order to maintain its purity, in view of a kingdom not of this world” (note 12).

Totleben however came prepared with an offer for alternative state service which would only take effect in ten years’ time (note 13). Mennonites would be permitted the option of rendering non-combatant service in factories, fire brigades, hospitals, trains, or work in specially established forestry detachments. Most in the Mennonite community in Russia were openly patriotic and prepared to offer some form of personal civil service, but crucially not under military command. Already during the Crimean War the colonies had made significant voluntary contributions, including care for wounded soldiers in colony hospitals and homes, which in their minds was essentially different from “care rendered under military command” (note 14).

For a majority of Mennonites, forestry service emerged as an acceptable option; detachments would be under a civilian department, and the Mennonite community would be able to offer worship services, pastoral care and discipline to its young men. The detachments would be financed and administered almost entirely by the extended pan-Russian Mennonite commonwealth.

“On account of their exemplary industriousness,” on April 8, 1874 the new Mennonite accommodations or privileges were ratified in an amended Paragraph 157. Mennonites would be permitted to carry out their active service “a) in the work-places of the marine department; b) in the fire brigades; and c) in special mobile detachments of the forestry department" (note 15).

Military exemption, the approval to establish a Mennonite-run forestry service, and the availability of exit visas to those wishing to emigrate were, according to James Urry, “remarkable acts of tolerance on the part of the Russian government” that “reflected how important the state saw the Mennonites” (note 16).

For his efforts Totleben was awarded the Order of St. Vladimir, First Class, with the rights of hereditary nobility, August 1874 (note 17).

While successful, Totleben’s visit was about a year late and his offer entrenched an already split Mennonite opinion. As soon as negotiations were completed, some thirty Mennonite families in Crimea sold their property and belongings to prepare for emigration. The entire Molotschna village of Alexanderwohl prepared to emigrate as well. Retired Rudnerweide Elder Benjamin Ratzlaff had been harboring doubts for at least two years, and found the final offer unacceptable. On May 19, 1874, one month after Totleben’s visit, he preached his farewell sermon and left with his children for America—itself a “witness … for this gospel of truth.” A week later in Pordenau two ministers delivered their farewell sermons. The church’s elder, Isaak Peters, was convinced that the Tsar’s offer of alternative service was “an unevangelical association with the ‘Beast,’ the state, hostile to God.” Of course, the rhetoric went in both directions (note 18), and the reasons for leaving were complex—they were not merely theological, but reflected a growing angst about landlessness (note 19), russification (note 20), control of schools, equality of all citizens, etc. (see links to related posts below). Peters’ rigour and apocalyptic framework divided his congregation, which then forced his resignation. Because of his open advocacy for emigration, Peters was expelled from Russia and left with a small following for Henderson, Nebraska (note 21).

The entire Bergthal Colony—where the problem of landlessness was high and concerns about the state’s offer were real—sold all their properties and chose to emigrate together, as did the Kleine Gemeinde Mennonites (note 22). In total, about one-third of the Mennonite population of New Russia left for North America in the 1870s. January 1, 2024, marks the sesquicentennial of that turning point in the Mennonite story and the crisis that forced the entire Mennonite community to reflect more deeply on their commitment to non-resistance and what that should or could look like moving forward in Russia or North America.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

For related posts, see: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/1871-mennonite-tough-luck.html; and https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/1873-first-russian-mennonites-leave-for.html; and https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2022/09/turning-weapons-into-waffle-irons.html; and https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/leave-for-kansas-if-pankratzes-go-well.html. 

Note 1: Cf. Paul Toews, “Mennonites and the Search for Military Exemption: State Concessions and Conflicts in the 1870s,” in Вопросы германской истории [Voprosii Germanskoi Istorii], 81–105 (Dnepropetrovsk: Porogi, 2007), 10. 

Note 2: Cf. also Josh Sanborn, “Military Reform, Moral Reform and the End of the Old Regime,” in The Military and Society in Russia: 1450–1917, edited by Eric Lohr and Marshall Poe (Leiden: Brill, 2002), 507f.

Note 3: Cf. letters in Cornelius Janzen, Sammlung von Notizen über Amerika (Danzig: Thieme, 1872). (Link). 

Note 4: Franz Isaac, Die Molotschnaer Mennoniten. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte derselben (Halbstadt, Taurien: H. J. Braun, 1908), 319. (Link)

Note 5: Cf. letter to the Tsar from the Chortitza ministerial, April 26, 1874, in Isaac, Molotschnaer Mennoniten, 326.

Note 6: Cited in Sanborn, “Military Reform,” 507.

Note 7: On §157 and its later amendment, cf. George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten in Rußland, vol. 2 (Lage: Logos, 1998), 226 (NB: Epp erroneously dates the par. 157 amendment as 1874 rather than 1875). On the issues around the policy change and migration, Epp’s entire ch. 7 is excellent, as well as Harry Loewen's “A House Divided. Russian Mennonite Nonresistance and Emigration in the 1870s,” in Mennonites in Russia, 1788–1988, edited by John J. Friesen (Winnipeg, MB: CMBC, 1989), 132f. (link).

Note 8: Sanborn, “Military Reform,” 508. For a more detailed review of the Great Reforms and their impact on Mennonites in Russia, see Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten, II, 211-225.

Note 9: Letter sent by Theodor Hans, pastor of the Moravian Brethren congregation in St. Petersburg, April 10, 1874, in Isaac, Molotschnaer Mennoniten, 320. For a state perspective, see S. D. Bondar, Mennonite Sect in Russia [1916], translated by Jacob Rempel and edited by Peter Rempel and Glenn Penner (Winnipeg, MB: Mennonite Heritage Archives, 2021), 80f.; 76-82 (link). Russian original: 1916, link.

Note 10: In Nikolai K. Schilder, Graf Eduard Ivanovich Totleben: Ego zhizn’ i’ deyatelnost’ [Count Eduard Ivanovich Totleben: Life and Works] vol. 1 (St. Petersburg: Tikhanov, 1885/1886), Appendix, 217 (link). 

Note 11: Cf. Schilder, Graf Eduard Ivanovich Totleben, vol. 2, 709 (link).

Note 12: Cf. Schilder, Graf Eduard Ivanovich Totleben, vol. 1, Appendix, 216.

Note 13: Cf. Gerhard Wiebe, Ursachen und Geschichte der Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus Russland nach Amerika (Winnipeg, MB, 1900), 31 (link).

Note 14: Peter M. Friesen, The Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia, 1789–1910 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978), 586, 589 (link).

Note 15: In P. Friesen, Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia, 596. See also the entire “Russian Mennonite Immigration Centennial Issue” of the Mennonite Quarterly Review (vol. 48, October 1974); also Hallesches Tageblatt 75, no. 281 (December 2, 1874), 1614. This press report speaks of a second round of offers from the state, in contradiction to documents in Isaac, Molotschnaer Mennoniten, 323–327.

Note 16: James Urry, “The Russian State, the Mennonite World and the Migration from Russia to North America in the 1870s,” Mennonite Life 46, no. 1 (March 1991), 14 (link).

Note 17: Cf. Schilder, Graf Eduard Ivanovich Totleben, vol. 2, 710.

Note 18: Cf. eg., P. Friesen, Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia, 592-594.

Note 19: Cf. esp. G. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten in Rußland, II, 235-237.

Note 20: Bondar, Mennonite Sect in Russia, 79f.

Note 21: Isaac Peters, “Die Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus Südrußland,” Zur Heimath 1, no. 4 (1875), 1 (link).

Note 22: See Wiebe, Ursachen und Geschichte der Auswanderung.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Sesquicentennial: Universal Military Service Manifesto Proclaimed, January 1, 1874," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), January 1, 2024.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Vaccinations in Chortitza and Molotschna, beginning in 1804

Vaccination lists for Chortitza Mennonite children in 1809 and 1814 were published prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with little curiosity ( note 1 ). However during the 2020-22 pandemic and in a context in which some refused to vaccinate for religious belief, the historic data took on new significance. Ancestors of some of the more conservative Russian Mennonite groups—like the Reinländer or the Bergthalers or the adult children of land delegate Jacob Höppner—were in fact vaccinating their infants and toddlers against small pox over two hundred years ago ( note 2 ). Also before the current pandemic Ukrainian historian Dmytro Myeshkov brought to light other archival materials on Mennonites and vaccination. The material below is my summary and translation of the relevant pages of Myeshkov’s massive 2008 volume on Black Sea German and their Worlds, 1781 to 1871 (German only; note 3 ). Myeshkov confirms that Chortitza was already immunizing its children in 1804 when their District Offic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Landless Crisis: Molotschna, 1840s to 1860s

The landless crisis in the mid-1800s in the Molotschna Colony is the context for most other matters of importance to its Mennonites, 1840s to 1860s. When discussing landlessness, historian David G. Rempel has claimed that the “seemingly endemic wranglings and splits” of the Mennonite church in South Russia were only seldom or superficially related to doctrine, and “almost invariably and intimately bound up with some of the most serious social and economic issues” that afflicted one or more of the congregations in the settlement ( note 1 ). It is important from the start to recognize that these Mennonites were not citizens,  but foreign colonists with obligations and privileges that governed their sojourn in New Russia. For Mennonites the privileges, e.g. of land and freedom from military conscription, were connected to the obligation of model farming. Mennonites were given one, and then later two districts of land for this purpose. Within their districts or colonies , villages w...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Widows, refugees, the unchurched, orphans and decommissioned soldiers: Building Church in Neuland, Paraguay

They were in unchartered waters when the Neuland (Colony) Mennonite Church in Paraguay was organized on November 12, 1947 under the innovative leadership of Hans Rempel (1908-2001). Rempel was ordained during German occupation of Ukraine, when “simple, untrained men and women called the believers together, read the Word, sang, and prayed” ( note 1 ). And for the others? In resettlement camps in Warthegau (annexed Poland) Rempel was encouraged by Heinrich Winter, the "last elder of Chortitza" to “make a new beginning ... like a farmer breaking up hard unplowed ground” (Jeremiah 4:3). After the refugees arrived in Paraguay in 1947, the church issues were many and the need for innovation was urgent. First , what should be the role of women in church leadership ? The tradition was very restrictive. The men however were largely missing and many of the women had experience of leadership in the re-establishment of church services during the German occupation of Russia. Innov...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 1 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accuarte and carefully considered. ~ANF American Mennonite leaders who supported Trump will be responding to the election results in the near future. Sometimes a template or sample conference address helps to formulate one’s own text. To that end I offer the following. When Hitler came to power in 1933, Mennonites in Germany sent official greetings by telegram: “The Conference of the East and West Prussian Mennonites meeting today at Tiegenhagen in the Free City of Danzig are deeply grateful for the tremendous uprising ( Erhebung ) that God has given our people ( Volk ) through the vigor and action of [unclear], and promise our cooperation in the construction of our Fatherland, true to the Gospel motto of [our founder Menno Simons], ‘For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.’” ( Note 1 ) Hitler responded in a letter...
Post a Comment
Read more