Skip to main content

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites.

The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 (note 1) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee (note 2). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration (note 3).

Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, a total exemption from individual service to the state was not an option for debate.

In Fall 1873 Mennonite delegates had hoped to meet with the Tsar himself but were unsuccessful. In their written petition of December 22, 1873, they articulated in no uncertain terms that the still unclear legislation “has unsettled our hearts to the utmost degree” because “we might lose an essential part of our confession of faith. … The matter is so serious and important,” they argued, it will determine “the continuing existence of our community.” The petition was made “in the name Lord Jesus Christ, who through our forefathers handed over to us a gospel of peace” (note 4).

The possibility of mass emigration was especially strong in the Bergthal and Chortitza Colonies, as well as among the Kleine Gemeinde in the Molotschna (note 5).

The axe finally fell on January 1, 1874 with the proclamation of the Universal Service Manifesto:

“[A] significant portion of Russian subjects are freed from the responsibility [of military service] that should be sacred for everyone in an equal measure. … Recent events have proven … that the strength of a state is not in the number of its troops alone, but is primarily in the moral and intellectual qualities of those troops. Those qualities only reach the highest stage of development when the business of defending the fatherland becomes the general affair of the people, when all, without distinction of title or status, unite for that holy cause.” (Note 6)

Paragraph 157 of the new law however granted Mennonites "exemption from service with arms," but obliged them "to serve in [army] workplaces and other institutions" (note 7).

Military reform was the capstone of major socio-political shifts in the late imperial period: military worth was no longer defined by socio-political privilege and title, but by professional military expertise; soldiers too were now to be conscripted individually “as citizens” rather than “en masse on an estate basis.” The reform was designed to fundamentally change—and westernize—the relationship of the individual to the state, with the intention “that military affairs would now become the task of the whole people” (note 8).

Not surprisingly, within three months of the Tsar’s proclamation, Mennonite emigration was in full swing.

As it became clear that Mennonites were not appeased by Paragraph 157, on April 10, 1874 the Tsar, who remembered the “commendable deeds” of the Mennonites during the Crimean campaign, commissioned his personal envoy (and friend of the Mennonites) General Adjutant Eduard Totleben to immediately travel and meet with the Mennonites and prevent a larger emigration (note 9). Upon his arrival in the region Totleben was petitioned by the nobility and merchant class for the same.

“To what extent the retention of the Mennonites in the Territory of New Russia is important can be seen from the fact that, on my arrival in to Ekaterinoslav, a deputation from the nobility and merchants explained to me that the emigration of the Mennonites would be accompanied by the most disastrous consequences for the entire south, because: 1) the Mennonites are advanced people in the economy, and in this respect 2) they are considered the best tenants of the landed estates. With the departure of the Mennonites all the lands in these provinces will fall by half their real value and will partly pass into the hands of the Jews [!], which will have the effect of ruining the landowners and causing a complete decline in regional agriculture. The same was repeatedly confirmed to me by the landowners from the land of the Don Cossaks, who are here in St. Petersburg.” (Note 10)

Over three weeks Totleben’s many explanations and demonstrations of the Tsar’s favour were repeatedly met “with quotes from the gospel and the dogmas of their confession” (note 11). Their “trust in the government had been greatly shaken,” and “having preserved all the provisions of their faith with inviolable severity, they are ready to sacrifice all earthly goods in order to maintain its purity, in view of a kingdom not of this world” (note 12).

Totleben however came prepared with an offer for alternative state service which would only take effect in ten years’ time (note 13). Mennonites would be permitted the option of rendering non-combatant service in factories, fire brigades, hospitals, trains, or work in specially established forestry detachments. Most in the Mennonite community in Russia were openly patriotic and prepared to offer some form of personal civil service, but crucially not under military command. Already during the Crimean War the colonies had made significant voluntary contributions, including care for wounded soldiers in colony hospitals and homes, which in their minds was essentially different from “care rendered under military command” (note 14).

For a majority of Mennonites, forestry service emerged as an acceptable option; detachments would be under a civilian department, and the Mennonite community would be able to offer worship services, pastoral care and discipline to its young men. The detachments would be financed and administered almost entirely by the extended pan-Russian Mennonite commonwealth.

“On account of their exemplary industriousness,” on April 8, 1874 the new Mennonite accommodations or privileges were ratified in an amended Paragraph 157. Mennonites would be permitted to carry out their active service “a) in the work-places of the marine department; b) in the fire brigades; and c) in special mobile detachments of the forestry department" (note 15).

Military exemption, the approval to establish a Mennonite-run forestry service, and the availability of exit visas to those wishing to emigrate were, according to James Urry, “remarkable acts of tolerance on the part of the Russian government” that “reflected how important the state saw the Mennonites” (note 16).

For his efforts Totleben was awarded the Order of St. Vladimir, First Class, with the rights of hereditary nobility, August 1874 (note 17).

While successful, Totleben’s visit was about a year late and his offer entrenched an already split Mennonite opinion. As soon as negotiations were completed, some thirty Mennonite families in Crimea sold their property and belongings to prepare for emigration. The entire Molotschna village of Alexanderwohl prepared to emigrate as well. Retired Rudnerweide Elder Benjamin Ratzlaff had been harboring doubts for at least two years, and found the final offer unacceptable. On May 19, 1874, one month after Totleben’s visit, he preached his farewell sermon and left with his children for America—itself a “witness … for this gospel of truth.” A week later in Pordenau two ministers delivered their farewell sermons. The church’s elder, Isaak Peters, was convinced that the Tsar’s offer of alternative service was “an unevangelical association with the ‘Beast,’ the state, hostile to God.” Of course, the rhetoric went in both directions (note 18), and the reasons for leaving were complex—they were not merely theological, but reflected a growing angst about landlessness (note 19), russification (note 20), control of schools, equality of all citizens, etc. (see links to related posts below). Peters’ rigour and apocalyptic framework divided his congregation, which then forced his resignation. Because of his open advocacy for emigration, Peters was expelled from Russia and left with a small following for Henderson, Nebraska (note 21).

The entire Bergthal Colony—where the problem of landlessness was high and concerns about the state’s offer were real—sold all their properties and chose to emigrate together, as did the Kleine Gemeinde Mennonites (note 22). In total, about one-third of the Mennonite population of New Russia left for North America in the 1870s. January 1, 2024, marks the sesquicentennial of that turning point in the Mennonite story and the crisis that forced the entire Mennonite community to reflect more deeply on their commitment to non-resistance and what that should or could look like moving forward in Russia or North America.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

For related posts, see: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/1871-mennonite-tough-luck.html; and https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/1873-first-russian-mennonites-leave-for.html; and https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2022/09/turning-weapons-into-waffle-irons.html; and https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/leave-for-kansas-if-pankratzes-go-well.html. 

Note 1: Cf. Paul Toews, “Mennonites and the Search for Military Exemption: State Concessions and Conflicts in the 1870s,” in Вопросы германской истории [Voprosii Germanskoi Istorii], 81–105 (Dnepropetrovsk: Porogi, 2007), 10. 

Note 2: Cf. also Josh Sanborn, “Military Reform, Moral Reform and the End of the Old Regime,” in The Military and Society in Russia: 1450–1917, edited by Eric Lohr and Marshall Poe (Leiden: Brill, 2002), 507f.

Note 3: Cf. letters in Cornelius Janzen, Sammlung von Notizen über Amerika (Danzig: Thieme, 1872). (Link). 

Note 4: Franz Isaac, Die Molotschnaer Mennoniten. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte derselben (Halbstadt, Taurien: H. J. Braun, 1908), 319. (Link)

Note 5: Cf. letter to the Tsar from the Chortitza ministerial, April 26, 1874, in Isaac, Molotschnaer Mennoniten, 326.

Note 6: Cited in Sanborn, “Military Reform,” 507.

Note 7: On §157 and its later amendment, cf. George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten in Rußland, vol. 2 (Lage: Logos, 1998), 226 (NB: Epp erroneously dates the par. 157 amendment as 1874 rather than 1875). On the issues around the policy change and migration, Epp’s entire ch. 7 is excellent, as well as Harry Loewen's “A House Divided. Russian Mennonite Nonresistance and Emigration in the 1870s,” in Mennonites in Russia, 1788–1988, edited by John J. Friesen (Winnipeg, MB: CMBC, 1989), 132f. (link).

Note 8: Sanborn, “Military Reform,” 508. For a more detailed review of the Great Reforms and their impact on Mennonites in Russia, see Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten, II, 211-225.

Note 9: Letter sent by Theodor Hans, pastor of the Moravian Brethren congregation in St. Petersburg, April 10, 1874, in Isaac, Molotschnaer Mennoniten, 320. For a state perspective, see S. D. Bondar, Mennonite Sect in Russia [1916], translated by Jacob Rempel and edited by Peter Rempel and Glenn Penner (Winnipeg, MB: Mennonite Heritage Archives, 2021), 80f.; 76-82 (link). Russian original: 1916, link.

Note 10: In Nikolai K. Schilder, Graf Eduard Ivanovich Totleben: Ego zhizn’ i’ deyatelnost’ [Count Eduard Ivanovich Totleben: Life and Works] vol. 1 (St. Petersburg: Tikhanov, 1885/1886), Appendix, 217 (link). 

Note 11: Cf. Schilder, Graf Eduard Ivanovich Totleben, vol. 2, 709 (link).

Note 12: Cf. Schilder, Graf Eduard Ivanovich Totleben, vol. 1, Appendix, 216.

Note 13: Cf. Gerhard Wiebe, Ursachen und Geschichte der Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus Russland nach Amerika (Winnipeg, MB, 1900), 31 (link).

Note 14: Peter M. Friesen, The Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia, 1789–1910 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978), 586, 589 (link).

Note 15: In P. Friesen, Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia, 596. See also the entire “Russian Mennonite Immigration Centennial Issue” of the Mennonite Quarterly Review (vol. 48, October 1974); also Hallesches Tageblatt 75, no. 281 (December 2, 1874), 1614. This press report speaks of a second round of offers from the state, in contradiction to documents in Isaac, Molotschnaer Mennoniten, 323–327.

Note 16: James Urry, “The Russian State, the Mennonite World and the Migration from Russia to North America in the 1870s,” Mennonite Life 46, no. 1 (March 1991), 14 (link).

Note 17: Cf. Schilder, Graf Eduard Ivanovich Totleben, vol. 2, 710.

Note 18: Cf. eg., P. Friesen, Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia, 592-594.

Note 19: Cf. esp. G. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten in Rußland, II, 235-237.

Note 20: Bondar, Mennonite Sect in Russia, 79f.

Note 21: Isaac Peters, “Die Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus Südrußland,” Zur Heimath 1, no. 4 (1875), 1 (link).

Note 22: See Wiebe, Ursachen und Geschichte der Auswanderung.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Sesquicentennial: Universal Military Service Manifesto Proclaimed, January 1, 1874," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), January 1, 2024.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Immigration to Canada, 1923: Background

In April 1921 Mennonites in the Caucasus and Don Region officially petitioned Moscow for permissions to emigrate—which Lenin had “flatly refused.” Their rationale was more than economic. “The disruption of economic conditions leads to impoverishment, which again goes hand in hand with the degradation of morals and has an alarming impact on our youth, who are also constantly exposed to the pressure of brutal and ruthless agitation on the part of those in power. … This decay of our spiritual and economic goods will only become greater and more ruinous.” ( Note 1 ) Later that year and some months before the large-scale feeding operations could begin in the Soviet Union, American Mennonite Relief (AMR) commissioner A.J. Miller petitioned the Soviet Embassy in London for exit permissions for 20,000 Mennonites ( note 1b) . He was unsuccessful. Nonetheless in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, key Mennonite leaders took a decision to work toward the re...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...
Post a Comment
Read more