1873: First Russian Mennonites leave for North America

On February 4, 1873, ministers and elders held a special meeting in Elder Isaak Peters’ Pordenau Molotschna church (note 1). It was a larger building with balcony, constructed in 1860 after the original 1828 stone church building had been torn down. They had put down deep roots in Russia; nonetheless Peters spoke strongly in favour of emigration and supported a decision to send land scouts to America. The team was given a mandate to negotiate for the possibility of some 50 to 60,000 Mennonite immigrants (note 2).

Eager to compete with the United States for settlers, the Canadian government passed an Order-in-Council on March 3, 1873 to create a Mennonite reservation of nine-and-one-third townships (note 3). The twelve-member deputation—including two Molotschna elders—which had been sent to North America returned in September with a favourable report (note 4).

Despite divergent opinions on the ground, the first hundred Russian Mennonite agriculturalists arrived in the United States in September 1873, and were heralded by the Boston-based Baptist press not only as “the advanced guard of 40,000 others,” but also as “the new pilgrims”: “Nothing can be more valuable to us in helping to perpetuate those principles which the Plymouth Pilgrims brought here … than a new influx of men ready to sacrifice all things for conscience and Christ” (note 5).

Heinrich J. Bräul was the teacher in the Pordenau schoolhouse in 1873. Of the 32 families represented in his 1873–74 school register, at least seven departed for Kansas, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Nebraska, the Dakotas and Manitoba (note 6).

James Urry estimates that 784 Molotschna families representing 4,500 people or 20 percent of the colony emigrated between 1873 and 1880 (note 7). In Pordenau, for example, the schoolhouse had thirteen fewer students in 1875–76 than two years earlier, a drop of 21 percent despite the arrival of new families—Koop, Nickel, and Schulz.

Most in the community did not leave until 1874 and following. In May 1874, two Pordenau ministers delivered their farewell sermons. Elder Isaak Peters was convinced with others that the Tsar’s offer of alternative service was “an unevangelical association with the ‘Beast,’ the state, hostile to God.” Because of his open advocacy for emigration, Peters was expelled from Russia; he continued to actively recruit immigrants from North America. “Mennonites who wish to stay true to the confession of their forefathers cannot agree to the service expected of them. … They have no option but to emigrate” (note 8). Three decades later he had lodged his own account of events squarely into the longer Anabaptist martyr tradition.

Russia's modernizing vision in which all were to become "citizens" (vs. subjects) with the same rights and same privileges, including on issues of military service and schooling, were troublesome. Bergthal Elder Gerhard Wiebe’s concern was to “protect and save” the children not only from military service, but also from “religious decline.” The accommodations under consideration were for him a sign of “nightfall upon Christendom,” namely that Mennonites had grown “tired of listening to the Word of God.” Wiebe’s younger ministerial colleague in Bergthal, David Stoesz, echoed the fear that “in most places … there is now a famine and darkness among the Christians,” just as the prophet Joel had prophesied of the time “before the terrible day of the Lord would come” (note 9). According to Wiebe, “[h]umility has disappeared and arrogance lets them go their own way and stand against God.” Wiebe and Stoesz framed Russia’s modernizing policies in terms of an end-time scenario—the dreaded downfall of the world, or less apocalyptically, the fall of the church.

It was from Sumatra that Russian Mennonite missionary and elder Heinrich Dirks advised his brethren against a mass migration to Canada: he knew that Mennonites who wished to be separate from the world would discover that even in the most distant places, the fallen world would one day find them out (note 10). The reasons for leaving were complex, and more than theological (note 11),

Ultimately about a third of the Mennonite community in Russia emigrated by 1880, splitting families and church communities in changing times. Teacher Bräul remained in Pordenau tasked in part to rebuild the fabric of the community, while his cousin and future Bergthal elder Johann Funk left to create a new, separated and more conservative Mennonite world on the Canadian prairie (note 12; pic).

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Cf. “Peters, Isaak (1826–1911),” https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Peters,_Isaak_(1826-1911); Dennis D. Engbrecht, “The Settlement of Russian Mennonites in York and Hamilton Counties, Nebraska,” Mennonite Life 39, no. 2 (1984), 7, https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1984jun.pdf (with pic); Isaac Peters, “Die Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus Südrußland,” Zur Heimath [Kansas] 1, no. 4 (1875), 1, https://bethelcollege.advantage-preservation.com/viewer/?t=29813&i=t&d=01011875-12311921&fn=zur_heimath_usa_illinois_summerfield_18750501_english_1&df=21&dt=30; also idem, “An Account of the Cause and Purpose that led to the Emigration of the Mennonites from Russia to America,” Herald of Truth 44, no. 45–47 (November 7, 14, 21, 1907), 417–418; 427; 437–438, https://archive.org/details/heraldoftruth44unse/mode/1up.

Note 2: Cf. the memoir of delegate Elder Leonhard Sudermann, Eine Deputationsreise von Rußland nach Amerika vor vierundzwanzig Jahren (Elkhardt, IN: Mennonitische Verlagshandlung, 1897), 7; 9f., https://archive.org/details/einedeputationsr00sude/.

Note 3: Arthur S. Morton, History of Prairie Settlement and “Dominion Lands” Policy, vol. II. Toronto: Macmillan, 1936), 54, https://archive.org/details/P006212/page/54/mode/2up?q=mennonites; cf. John Lowe, Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, March 12th, 1873, to Wm. Hespeler, Waterloo, Ontario, reprinted in Ernst Correll, “Mennonite Immigration into Manitoba (II),” 280. Manitoba: Sources and Documents, 1872, 1873 (Part II),” Mennonite Quarterly Review 11, no. 3 (July 1937), 280.

Note 4: Cf. Sudermann, Eine Deputationsreise.

Note 5: “The New Pilgrims,” Watchman and Reflector 54, no. 36 (Sept. 4, 1873), 2.

Note 6: Cf. Arnold Schroeder, trans., “Molotschna School Registers, 1873–1874,” http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/school73.htm, and “Molotschna School Registers, 1875–1876,” http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/school75.htm, as well as the corresponding entries in the “Genealogical Registry and Database of Mennonite Ancestry” (GRanDMA). Bernhard Fast family to Kansas, 1874; Johann Fast family to Minnesota, 1875; Franz Janzen family to Nebraska, 1879; Isaak Loewen family to Manitoba, 1874; Franz Toews family to Minnesota 1857; Heinrich Unruh family to the Dakotas in 1874; Jacob Schulz family (see 1875–76 Register) to Kansas, 1879. Five further Pordenau families are listed in April 1874 as wishing to resettle in America; see Steve Fast, trans., “List of Molotschna Mennonites wishing to immigrate to America, 1874,” Russian State Historical Archive, St. Petersburg, Fond 1246, Opis, 1 Delo 8, 109–120, http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/Molotschna1874.html.

Note 7: James Urry, cited in Helmut Huebert, Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life (Winnipeg, MB: Springfield, 1986), 89, https://archive.org/details/HierschauAnExampleOfRussianMennoniteLifeOCRopt/page/n113.

Note 8: Peters, “Die Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus Südrußland,” 1; also idem, “An Account of the Cause and Purpose that led to the Emigration." The reasons however were not all theological; cf. previous posts linked in footnote 2 above.

Note 9: Lawrence Klippenstein, “Aeltester David Stoesz and the Bergthal Story: Some Diary Notes [Part I],” Mennonite Life 31, no. 1 (April 1976) 15, https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1976apr.pdf. See also Gerhard Wiebe, Ursachen und Geschichte der Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus Russland nach Amerika (Winnipeg, MB, 1900), 29, https://chortitza.org/Pis/Wiebe.pdf.

Note 10: Cf. George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten in Rußland, vol. II (Lage: Logos, 1998), 232.

Note 11: See Franz Isaac, Die Molotschnaer Mennoniten. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte derselben (Halbstadt, Taurien: H. J. Braun, 1908), 319, https://archive.org/details/die-molotschnaer-mennoniten-editablea, ET: https://www.mharchives.ca/download/3573/. Also previous posts, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/1870s-emigration-more-complicated-than.html; AND https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/1871-mennonite-tough-luck.html; AND https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/leave-for-kansas-if-pankratzes-go-well.html; AND https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2024/01/sesquicentennial-proclamation-of.html.

Note 12: Lawrence Klippenstein, “Funk, Johann,” Dictionary of Canadian Biography, vol. 14 (Toronto/ Laval: University of Toronto/Université Laval, 2003), http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/funk_johann_14E.html. See previous post (forthcoming).

Comments

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia: “We cordially plead ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß"; note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog