Skip to main content

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds.

While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists.

Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2.

In the next ten days, a further nine transports arrived from Moscow to Germany by train via Riga, Latvia. In total 5,671 “Russian-German farmers” to Germany from the USSR; about 3,885 were Mennonites. Those left behind—by then as many as 9,000 Mennonites—were forcibly loaded into trucks, taken to a railway station, and pushed into overcrowded freight cars typically destined for exile settlement.

Of the Mennonites evacuated to Germany in 1929, only about 800 were cleared for immigration to Canada. MCC settled another 1,572 in Paraguay, and 1,440 sailed for Brazil.

The high-stakes international drama behind the scenes in October and November 1929 is presented below to complement the video.

(A first group left in August—which sparked the large-scale flight to Moscow; see previous post).

October 11 (?): Official representative of Russian Mennonites Benjamin H. Unruh submits petition to Germany’s Foreign Affairs outlining the critical condition of the Moscow refugees and options for assistance (note 1).

October 13 & 15: Foreign Affairs Counsel Carl Dienstmann is dispatched to Moscow for diplomatic negotiations with Boris Shtein of the People’s Commissariat for Foreign Affairs (note 2). Did not go well.

October 16: The Secretariat of the Central Committee of Communist Party makes decision to forcibly return ethnic Germans gathered on the outskirts of Moscow to places of origin.

October 17: A three-person “private” German delegation interviews the German farmers in the suburban cottages of Moscow together with reporters, to the great anger of Shtein.

October 18: With the foreign press ready to publish, a compromise was reached between Germany and the Soviet Union, leading to a Politburo decision signed by Stalin that read, “Do not object to emigration of Mennonites gathered near Moscow” (note 3). Germany in turn communicated to Canadian officials the news and offered to guarantee return for deferred, “defective,” or deported immigrants.

October 26: USSR actively urges Germany “to accelerate the departure of the colonists,” whom they now publicly deemed to be “class-hostile elements,” starting with some 800 to 1000 persons out of Leningrad, followed soon after by another 5,000 via train (note 4).

October 27: German Foreign Affairs is informed by Moscow that a first group would depart on October 28; Unruh and Canadian officials informed on 28th.

October 29: Unruh wires Bishop David Toews (Rosthern; Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization) to confirm the larger movement and need for the Canadian Pacific Railway [CPR] to assume responsibility.

October 29: Before any response from Canada, a small first group of 323 refugees was moved out rof Moscow to Leningrad, and on Oct. 31 for Kiel, Germany where they arrive three days later (note 5). A second group is departs Oct. 31 but is held up in Leningrad for one month ("Swineünde" group).

October 30: Toews responds: “Trying to arrange by wire with [CPR; Colonel] Dennis and [Prime Minister] King movement of total group” (note 6). Germany approves movement with expectation that Canada would ultimately accept refugees and the CPR take on costs.

October 30: Canadian gov’t tells Berlin it is not prepared to accept refugees before the spring. The CPR refuses to take any financial responsibility for the emigrants and costs; Germany immediately stops further approvals (note 7).

November 2: Unruh wires Toews: “Moscow will send colonists to Siberia if Ottawa refuses on Monday. Berlin requires a decision whether despite possible refusal by Ottawa 6,000 should be brought to Hamburg. I urgently request immediate direction before tomorrow” (note 8).

November 3: With arrival of Kiel group, the conservative Berlin-based newspaper Vossische Zeitung prepared to tell full story of catastrophic flight of thousands of “blonde, healthy farmers of German stock” to embarrass Moscow and stir German emotions (note 9).

November 4: Chicago Tribune draws attention to the plight of Mennonites, and to real possibility of a massive movement (note 10).

November 4: Unruh restarts negotiations with only vague indications of financial support from North American, Dutch and German churches to maintain refugees in Germany (note 11).

November 4: Toews deputation to meet with Prime Minister King in Saskatchewan. Postponed. German Consul General Ludwig Kempff in Montreal: “Toews wires that he will meet with the Prime Minister tomorrow (November 5); please obtain postponement in Moscow.” Unruh reports that delay “made Berlin very anxious,” even if “Mr. King is very sympathetic to the Mennonites” (note 12).

November 6: German Foreign Minister Julius Curtius reports to Reich Chancellery that if USSR grants exit visas and Germany does not act, thousands of these “farmers of German origin” in Moscow would be “shipped back to Siberia … abandoned and exposed to certain destruction”—and on the “European stage [Moscow] will ascribe blame for the fate of the people to us” (note 13). Curtius inclined to make a hard break in German-Soviet relations if necessary (note 14).

November 6: PM King tells Toews' deputation that it is a matter for Minister of Immigration and Colonization, Hon. Robert Forke, and that the provinces concerned—Saskatchewan was first choice—would need to be consulted (note 15). On King’s advice Toews left immediately for Ottawa to meet with Forke, representatives of the CPR, and Kempff; wires Saskatchewan’s new Conservative/Co-Operative Premier James Anderson.

November 6: Berlin press captures urgency of moment and points blame squarely at Canada’s politicians and Mennonite organizers (note 16). American MCC Executive members tracking news; they do not understand or feel the urgency of crisis (note 17).

November 6: Stalin returns from his vacation and is briefed on the entire matter; more extreme measures planned (note 18).

November 7: Chicago Tribune reports on the Kiel group and on the urgency of the situation: “Due to the delay of the arrival of the Canadian visas, soviet authorities have threatened to deport the remaining Mennonites to Siberia” (note 19).

November 8: Kiel group makes positive impression on German press. Unruh very pleased with the role of the press and their intervention “on a grand scale” (note 20).

November 8: Unruh meets with Foreign Affairs in Berlin. Kempff’s latest report from Montreal infuriates officials over pace of Mennonite action and Canadian decision-making (note 21). Unruh drafts impassioned appeal to congregations in North America and Europe—“In the Midst of the Storm”—perhaps his most powerful and urgent short essay, mirroring the state of his own emotions and the tremendous weight of the moment (note 22).

November 9: Toews, Forke and Kempff meet; Forke informs that Saskatchewan Premier Anderson “had raised objections to the admission of Mennonites.” Toews leaves immediately to lobby premiers of Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta once more (note 23).

November 7, 8 and 9: To North American colleagues Unruh reports on exceptionally “stormy days” with authorities (note 24). Aid committees from cities of Hamburg, Kiel and Bremen form with the active participation of Hamburg-Altona Mennonite Church and Pastor Otto Schowalter (note 25).

November 11: German embassy in Moscow estimates numbers have grown to 13,000 (about 10,000 Mennonites). Embassy Consul Twardowski, Director for Eastern Affairs (Foreign Affairs), reports movement has “taken on an ominous character” (note 26), and the Soviet state was now blocking a further influx by guarding village exit points, ceasing the sale of train tickets to Russian Germans, and removing colonists already in Moscow on railroad cars. Advises that if Germany misses opportunity to help “compatriots of German origin abroad” it will result “in irreparable damage to German policy on minorities.” He urgently requests Foreign Affairs, party leaders and budget committees “to spare no effort to obtain approval for the temporary transfer of these people to Germany” (note 27).

November 13: In morning papers and with “radiogram” played across Germany, German Red Cross together with other German aid organizations call all Germans to join in the campaign, “Brothers in Need!” (note 28).

November 13: Toews meets with Manitoba Deputy Premier R. A. Hoey, who confirms that Manitoba would accept 250 Mennonite families despite the growing unemployment problem.

November 14: Unruh exasperated with MCC executive: “I am waiting on pins and needles for the promised letter regarding financial matters … The whole world is now looking to our [Mennonite] church in Europe and America for what they will do" (note 29).

November 14: Unruh’s information from Canada “was judged as insufficient by the [German] officials.” Unruh is briefed extensively on other settlement opportunities, including Brazil (note 30); meets with the Brazilian ambassador. “I have never had such anxious days in my life as in the last few weeks,” he wrote Toews (note 31).

November 15: Toews meets with Alberta Premier J. E. Brownlee with no success.

Night of November 15 to 16: Worst-case scenario unfolds in Moscow as the GPU (secret police) forcibly arrests 500 heads of families. Two days earlier the embassy thought they had successfully restrained the Soviet government “from the threatened return transports until the conditions for emigration have been created both in Germany itself and overseas” (note 32).

November 18: German Foreign Affairs recommends to Reich Cabinet that 6 million marks ($1,428,000 USD) be approved for the transfer and temporary housing over three to six months for approximately 13,000 German colonists from Russia (note 33).

November 21: Saskatchewan Premier wires Ottawa with the province’s final refusal to admit Mennonite refugees for settlement.

The international drama continued until the end of the month when the group in Leningrad was cleared to leave for the German port of Swinemünde, as well as nine trains from Moscow over Riga, Latvia to Germany.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

YouTube video link.

I thank Brent Wiebe for helping to locate and identify the photos, and Marvin Rempel for sharing MCC archival materials. The new photos are largely from the federal archives in Germany and Poland, as well as news photos as well.

Note a: Like the Kiel group, the Swinemünde group was also taken first to the Soviet Merchant Marine hostel where they were fed, disinfected, and medically examined. After some two weeks, they were told that Canada would not admit them before the spring; consequently they should prepare to return back to their home villages. Because all their money had been taken and they had no food, five were given permission to leave the hostel area to hawk their remaining valuables for food; desperate, they also searched for the German consulate in Leningrad and informed them of their dire situation. Here they received promises for assistance but were still largely penniless and on their own for food. Two weeks later on November 29, the group was granted special permission by Germany to depart, and they arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. See Henry J. Willms, ed., At the Gates of Moscow. God’s gracious aid through a most difficult and trying period, translated by George G. Thielman (Yarrow, BC: Columbia, 1964), 51-57 (link).

Note 1: Benjamin H. Unruh, “Bericht über die katastrophale Lage der menn. Ansiedlungen in Russland und die Massenflucht der Kolonisten,” October 29, 1929, 1b. Report to Mennonite Central Committee. From Mennonite Central Committee Archives, Akron, PA (hereafter MCC-A), IX-02, box 4, file 4. For overview, cf. idem, “Verzweifelte Selbsthilfe,” in Rußlanddeutsche suchen eine Heimat. Die deutsche Einwanderung in den paraguayischen Chaco, edited by Walter Quiring, 106–115 (Karlsruhe: Schneider, 1938) (link).

Note 2: B. Unruh, “Bericht II: Über Verhandlungen in Berlin, vom 19.10 bis 24.10.,” October 25, 1929. Report to Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization. From MCC-A, IX-02, box 4, file 4; idem, “Bericht über die katastrophale Lage,” October 29, 1929; also B. H. Unruh to Peter Braun, October 29, 1929, letter. From Mennonite Library and Archives – Bethel College (hereafter MLA-B), MS 91, folder 2 (link).

Note 3: Cf. Andrey I. Savin, “The 1929 Emigration of Mennonites from the USSR: An Examination of Documents from the Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 30 (2012), 47f. (link); Otto Auhagen, Die Schicksalswende des Russlanddeutschen Bauerntum in den Jahren 1927–1930 (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1942), 49 (link). Cf. also Colin Neufeldt, “Flight to Moscow, 1929: An Act of Mennonite Civil Disobedience,” Preservings 19 (December 2001), 39-41 (link).

Note 4: Twardowski to Foreign Affairs, October 29, 1929, in Reichskanzelei, “Die deutschstämmigen Kolonisten in Rußland,” November 1929–Februar 1935, Auswärtige Angelegenheiten, Bundesarchiv (hereafter BA), R 43-I/141, Blätter 8–10 (link).

Note 5: Cf. also C. Neufeldt, “Flight to Moscow, 1929,” 39f.; Heinrich Dürksen, Daß du nicht vergessest der Geschichten. Lebenserinnerungen (Filadelfia: ASCIM, 1990), 66-70; 219-231. Also Heinrich Martins to [C.F.] Klassen, report, December 29, 1929, MCC-A, IX 1-3, Box 7, File 7-0015.

Note 6: For the flurry of messages received by or relayed to Unruh from Montreal, Winnipeg, Moscow and Berlin in these days, cf. Benjamin Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht deutsch-russ. Bauern,” November 23, 1929. Report to Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization (hereafter CMBC). From MCC-A, IX-02, box 4, file 4, 0006. Summary in Willms, At the Gates of Moscow, 134.

Note 7: B. Unruh to P. Braun, October 29, 1929, 1. On Col. J. S. Dennis, cf. Frank H. Epp, Mennonite Exodus (Altona, MB: Friesens, 1962), ch. 9.

Note 8: In B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht, November 23, 1929,” 3, 3b.

Note 9: W. Stein, “Bauernflucht aus Rußland,” Vossische Zeitung (November 3, 1929), 4. For all references to this newspaper, cf. link. Cf. Erwin Warkentin, “Germany’s Diplomatic Efforts during the 1929 Mennonite Immigration Crisis,” Mennonite Historian 31, no. 3 (September 2005), 4–5, 8 (link); idem, “The Mennonites before Moscow: The Notes of Dr. Otto Auhagen,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 26 (2008), 201–220 (link); also Willms, At the Gates of Moscow, 69. For the Kiel Passenger Lists: Part I: Mennonitische Rundschau 53, no. 2 (January 8, 1930), 6 (link); Part II: MR 53, no. 3 (January 15, 1930), 2 (link). Colin Neufeldt offers a gripping account of how this group in one suburb of Moscow was the first to receive exit visas and to leave the city (about 323) in 6 rail cars for Leningrad on October 30: “Flight to Moscow, 1929, 38f.

Note 10: D. Daly, “Russia blocks ruined German farmers’ flight,” Chicago Daily Tribune (November 4, 1929). Multiple newspapers were investigating this story; cf. E. Warkentin, “Mennonites before Moscow,” 210.

Note 11: B. Unruh, “Verzweifelte Selbsthilfe,” 113.

Note 12: “Request that Mennonites in Germany be brought to Dominion,” Lethbridge Herald (November 6, 1929), 1. See F. Epp, Mennonite Exodus, ch. 17.

Note 13: Curtius to the State Secretary of the Chancellery, November 6, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik, Serie B, vol. XIII (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1979), 227, no. 104 (link).

Note 14: Cf. Andreas Rödder, Stresemanns Erbe: Julius Curtius und die deutsche Außenpolitik, 1929–1931 (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1996), 152f. (link).

Note 15: “Request that Mennonites in Germany be brought to Dominion,” Lethbridge Herald (November 6, 1929) 1. See F. Epp, Mennonite Exodus, ch. 17.

Note 16: “Zurück in die Hölle?,” Vossische Zeitung, Morning Edition, no. 524 (November 6, 1929), 3.

Note 17: Maxwell Kratz to P. Hiebert, L. Mumaw and O. Miller, November 6, 1929, letter. From MCC-A, IX-01, box 7, file 7, 0003; “Russian Situation,” Gospel Herald 22, no. 34 (November 21, 1929), 689 (link).

Note 18: Cf. Walter Quiring, “Die Urenkel kehren heim: Die Massenflucht der rußlanddeutschen Bauern 1929,” Deutschtum im Ausland 22, no. 5 (May 1939), 272 (link).

Note 19: “383 Peasants, starved by Reds, huddle in Kiel,” Chicago Tribune (November 7, 1929).

Note 20: “Als zehntausende Russlanddeutsche fliehen mussten,” Frankfurter Zeitung (November 8, 1929); B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht, November 23, 1929,” 3; “Zurück in die Hölle?”

Note 21: B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht,” 5b.

Note 22: B. Unruh “Mitten im Sturm,” Mennonitische Blätter 76, no. 12 (December 1929), 106f. (link); also Mennonitische Rundschau 52, no. 50 (December 1929), 3 (link); translation in Willms, Gates of Moscow, 120–124.

Note 23: “9. November 1929, Kempff an das Auswärtige Amt” (Dokumente 4-5), Deutsche Hilfsmaßnahmen zugunsten der Auswanderung deutschstämmiger Flüchtlinge überwiegend mennonitischen Glaubens aus der Sowjetunion und ihre Ansiedlung in überseeischen Gebieten, 1929–1932. 23 Dokumente aus dem Politischen Archiv des Auswärtigen Amts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Archiv Fernheim, Paraguay. Anderson’s wired message to Forke, November 9, 1929, is copied in F. Epp, Mennonite Exodus, 247.

Note 24: B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht,” 5b.

Note 25: C. F. Claasen to Maxwell Kratz, November 23, 1929, letter (with clipping). From MCC-A, IX-02, box 4, file 3, 0020. Also Mennonitische Blätter 76, no. 12 (December 1929), 105 (link).

Note 26: “11. November 1929, Drahtbericht, Twardowski an das Auswärtige Amt,” Deutsche Hilfsmaßnahmen: Dokumente, 6–7; also “13. November 1929, Oskar Trautman an Julius Curtius,” Deutsche Hilfsmaßnahmen: Dokumente, 8–12.

Note 27: “11. November 1929, Twardowski an das Auswärtige Amt,” Deutsche Hilfsmaßnahmen: Dokumente, 6–7; “11. November 1929, Drahtbericht, Twardowski an das Auswärtige Amt,” also “13. November 1929, Oskar Trautman an Julius Curtius,” Reichskanzelei, “Die deutschstämmigen Kolonisten in Rußland,” Blatt 24 (slide 49).

Note 28: Cf. “Brüder in Not!,” Vossische Zeitung (Berlin), no. 536 (November 13, 1929), 6; Mennonitische Blätter 76, no. 12 (December 1929), 105 (link).

Note 29: Benjamin H. Unruh to Levi Mumaw, November 14, 1929. From MCC-A, IX-01-01, box 10, file 210036.

Note 30: B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht, November 23, 1929,” 8.

Note 31: B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht,” November 23, 1929, 4.

Note 32: “13. November 1929, Trautman an Curtius,” Deutsche Hilfsmaßnahmen: Dokumente, 8–12.

Note 33: On costs, cf. Curtius to the State Secretary of the Chancellery, November 6, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik, Serie B, XIII, 227, no. 104; 228 n.8; budget proposal, Nov 13, 1929, Reichskanzelei, “Die deutschstämmigen Kolonisten in Rußland,” 135, no. 66.

Note 34: F. Epp, Mennonite Exodus, 239.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany (with video),” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), December 30, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/12/1929-flight-of-mennonites-to-moscow-and.html.

Comments

  1. Thank you very much for publishing this story, including the video. We must remember these stories. The next generation deserves them because those who do not know the past are condemned to repeat it. Those who do know are better able to discern the present as well as navigate the future.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...