Skip to main content

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds.

While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists.

Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2.

In the next ten days, a further nine transports arrived from Moscow to Germany by train via Riga, Latvia. In total 5,671 “Russian-German farmers” to Germany from the USSR; about 3,885 were Mennonites. Those left behind—by then as many as 9,000 Mennonites—were forcibly loaded into trucks, taken to a railway station, and pushed into overcrowded freight cars typically destined for exile settlement.

Of the Mennonites evacuated to Germany in 1929, only about 800 were cleared for immigration to Canada. MCC settled another 1,572 in Paraguay, and 1,440 sailed for Brazil.

The high-stakes international drama behind the scenes in October and November 1929 is presented below to complement the video.

(A first group left in August—which sparked the large-scale flight to Moscow; see previous post).

October 11 (?): Official representative of Russian Mennonites Benjamin H. Unruh submits petition to Germany’s Foreign Affairs outlining the critical condition of the Moscow refugees and options for assistance (note 1).

October 13 & 15: Foreign Affairs Counsel Carl Dienstmann is dispatched to Moscow for diplomatic negotiations with Boris Shtein of the People’s Commissariat for Foreign Affairs (note 2). Did not go well.

October 16: The Secretariat of the Central Committee of Communist Party makes decision to forcibly return ethnic Germans gathered on the outskirts of Moscow to places of origin.

October 17: A three-person “private” German delegation interviews the German farmers in the suburban cottages of Moscow together with reporters, to the great anger of Shtein.

October 18: With the foreign press ready to publish, a compromise was reached between Germany and the Soviet Union, leading to a Politburo decision signed by Stalin that read, “Do not object to emigration of Mennonites gathered near Moscow” (note 3). Germany in turn communicated to Canadian officials the news and offered to guarantee return for deferred, “defective,” or deported immigrants.

October 26: USSR actively urges Germany “to accelerate the departure of the colonists,” whom they now publicly deemed to be “class-hostile elements,” starting with some 800 to 1000 persons out of Leningrad, followed soon after by another 5,000 via train (note 4).

October 27: German Foreign Affairs is informed by Moscow that a first group would depart on October 28; Unruh and Canadian officials informed on 28th.

October 29: Unruh wires Bishop David Toews (Rosthern; Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization) to confirm the larger movement and need for the Canadian Pacific Railway [CPR] to assume responsibility.

October 29: Before any response from Canada, a small first group of 323 refugees was moved out rof Moscow to Leningrad, and on Oct. 31 for Kiel, Germany where they arrive three days later (note 5). A second group is departs Oct. 31 but is held up in Leningrad for one month ("Swineünde" group).

October 30: Toews responds: “Trying to arrange by wire with [CPR; Colonel] Dennis and [Prime Minister] King movement of total group” (note 6). Germany approves movement with expectation that Canada would ultimately accept refugees and the CPR take on costs.

October 30: Canadian gov’t tells Berlin it is not prepared to accept refugees before the spring. The CPR refuses to take any financial responsibility for the emigrants and costs; Germany immediately stops further approvals (note 7).

November 2: Unruh wires Toews: “Moscow will send colonists to Siberia if Ottawa refuses on Monday. Berlin requires a decision whether despite possible refusal by Ottawa 6,000 should be brought to Hamburg. I urgently request immediate direction before tomorrow” (note 8).

November 3: With arrival of Kiel group, the conservative Berlin-based newspaper Vossische Zeitung prepared to tell full story of catastrophic flight of thousands of “blonde, healthy farmers of German stock” to embarrass Moscow and stir German emotions (note 9).

November 4: Chicago Tribune draws attention to the plight of Mennonites, and to real possibility of a massive movement (note 10).

November 4: Unruh restarts negotiations with only vague indications of financial support from North American, Dutch and German churches to maintain refugees in Germany (note 11).

November 4: Toews deputation to meet with Prime Minister King in Saskatchewan. Postponed. German Consul General Ludwig Kempff in Montreal: “Toews wires that he will meet with the Prime Minister tomorrow (November 5); please obtain postponement in Moscow.” Unruh reports that delay “made Berlin very anxious,” even if “Mr. King is very sympathetic to the Mennonites” (note 12).

November 6: German Foreign Minister Julius Curtius reports to Reich Chancellery that if USSR grants exit visas and Germany does not act, thousands of these “farmers of German origin” in Moscow would be “shipped back to Siberia … abandoned and exposed to certain destruction”—and on the “European stage [Moscow] will ascribe blame for the fate of the people to us” (note 13). Curtius inclined to make a hard break in German-Soviet relations if necessary (note 14).

November 6: PM King tells Toews' deputation that it is a matter for Minister of Immigration and Colonization, Hon. Robert Forke, and that the provinces concerned—Saskatchewan was first choice—would need to be consulted (note 15). On King’s advice Toews left immediately for Ottawa to meet with Forke, representatives of the CPR, and Kempff; wires Saskatchewan’s new Conservative/Co-Operative Premier James Anderson.

November 6: Berlin press captures urgency of moment and points blame squarely at Canada’s politicians and Mennonite organizers (note 16). American MCC Executive members tracking news; they do not understand or feel the urgency of crisis (note 17).

November 6: Stalin returns from his vacation and is briefed on the entire matter; more extreme measures planned (note 18).

November 7: Chicago Tribune reports on the Kiel group and on the urgency of the situation: “Due to the delay of the arrival of the Canadian visas, soviet authorities have threatened to deport the remaining Mennonites to Siberia” (note 19).

November 8: Kiel group makes positive impression on German press. Unruh very pleased with the role of the press and their intervention “on a grand scale” (note 20).

November 8: Unruh meets with Foreign Affairs in Berlin. Kempff’s latest report from Montreal infuriates officials over pace of Mennonite action and Canadian decision-making (note 21). Unruh drafts impassioned appeal to congregations in North America and Europe—“In the Midst of the Storm”—perhaps his most powerful and urgent short essay, mirroring the state of his own emotions and the tremendous weight of the moment (note 22).

November 9: Toews, Forke and Kempff meet; Forke informs that Saskatchewan Premier Anderson “had raised objections to the admission of Mennonites.” Toews leaves immediately to lobby premiers of Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta once more (note 23).

November 7, 8 and 9: To North American colleagues Unruh reports on exceptionally “stormy days” with authorities (note 24). Aid committees from cities of Hamburg, Kiel and Bremen form with the active participation of Hamburg-Altona Mennonite Church and Pastor Otto Schowalter (note 25).

November 11: German embassy in Moscow estimates numbers have grown to 13,000 (about 10,000 Mennonites). Embassy Consul Twardowski, Director for Eastern Affairs (Foreign Affairs), reports movement has “taken on an ominous character” (note 26), and the Soviet state was now blocking a further influx by guarding village exit points, ceasing the sale of train tickets to Russian Germans, and removing colonists already in Moscow on railroad cars. Advises that if Germany misses opportunity to help “compatriots of German origin abroad” it will result “in irreparable damage to German policy on minorities.” He urgently requests Foreign Affairs, party leaders and budget committees “to spare no effort to obtain approval for the temporary transfer of these people to Germany” (note 27).

November 13: In morning papers and with “radiogram” played across Germany, German Red Cross together with other German aid organizations call all Germans to join in the campaign, “Brothers in Need!” (note 28).

November 13: Toews meets with Manitoba Deputy Premier R. A. Hoey, who confirms that Manitoba would accept 250 Mennonite families despite the growing unemployment problem.

November 14: Unruh exasperated with MCC executive: “I am waiting on pins and needles for the promised letter regarding financial matters … The whole world is now looking to our [Mennonite] church in Europe and America for what they will do" (note 29).

November 14: Unruh’s information from Canada “was judged as insufficient by the [German] officials.” Unruh is briefed extensively on other settlement opportunities, including Brazil (note 30); meets with the Brazilian ambassador. “I have never had such anxious days in my life as in the last few weeks,” he wrote Toews (note 31).

November 15: Toews meets with Alberta Premier J. E. Brownlee with no success.

Night of November 15 to 16: Worst-case scenario unfolds in Moscow as the GPU (secret police) forcibly arrests 500 heads of families. Two days earlier the embassy thought they had successfully restrained the Soviet government “from the threatened return transports until the conditions for emigration have been created both in Germany itself and overseas” (note 32).

November 18: German Foreign Affairs recommends to Reich Cabinet that 6 million marks ($1,428,000 USD) be approved for the transfer and temporary housing over three to six months for approximately 13,000 German colonists from Russia (note 33).

November 21: Saskatchewan Premier wires Ottawa with the province’s final refusal to admit Mennonite refugees for settlement.

The international drama continued until the end of the month when the group in Leningrad was cleared to leave for the German port of Swinemünde, as well as nine trains from Moscow over Riga, Latvia to Germany.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

YouTube video link.

I thank Brent Wiebe for helping to locate and identify the photos, and Marvin Rempel for sharing MCC archival materials. The new photos are largely from the federal archives in Germany and Poland, as well as news photos as well.

Note a: Like the Kiel group, the Swinemünde group was also taken first to the Soviet Merchant Marine hostel where they were fed, disinfected, and medically examined. After some two weeks, they were told that Canada would not admit them before the spring; consequently they should prepare to return back to their home villages. Because all their money had been taken and they had no food, five were given permission to leave the hostel area to hawk their remaining valuables for food; desperate, they also searched for the German consulate in Leningrad and informed them of their dire situation. Here they received promises for assistance but were still largely penniless and on their own for food. Two weeks later on November 29, the group was granted special permission by Germany to depart, and they arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. See Henry J. Willms, ed., At the Gates of Moscow. God’s gracious aid through a most difficult and trying period, translated by George G. Thielman (Yarrow, BC: Columbia, 1964), 51-57 (link).

Note 1: Benjamin H. Unruh, “Bericht über die katastrophale Lage der menn. Ansiedlungen in Russland und die Massenflucht der Kolonisten,” October 29, 1929, 1b. Report to Mennonite Central Committee. From Mennonite Central Committee Archives, Akron, PA (hereafter MCC-A), IX-02, box 4, file 4. For overview, cf. idem, “Verzweifelte Selbsthilfe,” in Rußlanddeutsche suchen eine Heimat. Die deutsche Einwanderung in den paraguayischen Chaco, edited by Walter Quiring, 106–115 (Karlsruhe: Schneider, 1938) (link).

Note 2: B. Unruh, “Bericht II: Über Verhandlungen in Berlin, vom 19.10 bis 24.10.,” October 25, 1929. Report to Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization. From MCC-A, IX-02, box 4, file 4; idem, “Bericht über die katastrophale Lage,” October 29, 1929; also B. H. Unruh to Peter Braun, October 29, 1929, letter. From Mennonite Library and Archives – Bethel College (hereafter MLA-B), MS 91, folder 2 (link).

Note 3: Cf. Andrey I. Savin, “The 1929 Emigration of Mennonites from the USSR: An Examination of Documents from the Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 30 (2012), 47f. (link); Otto Auhagen, Die Schicksalswende des Russlanddeutschen Bauerntum in den Jahren 1927–1930 (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1942), 49 (link). Cf. also Colin Neufeldt, “Flight to Moscow, 1929: An Act of Mennonite Civil Disobedience,” Preservings 19 (December 2001), 39-41 (link).

Note 4: Twardowski to Foreign Affairs, October 29, 1929, in Reichskanzelei, “Die deutschstämmigen Kolonisten in Rußland,” November 1929–Februar 1935, Auswärtige Angelegenheiten, Bundesarchiv (hereafter BA), R 43-I/141, Blätter 8–10 (link).

Note 5: Cf. also C. Neufeldt, “Flight to Moscow, 1929,” 39f.; Heinrich Dürksen, Daß du nicht vergessest der Geschichten. Lebenserinnerungen (Filadelfia: ASCIM, 1990), 66-70; 219-231. Also Heinrich Martins to [C.F.] Klassen, report, December 29, 1929, MCC-A, IX 1-3, Box 7, File 7-0015.

Note 6: For the flurry of messages received by or relayed to Unruh from Montreal, Winnipeg, Moscow and Berlin in these days, cf. Benjamin Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht deutsch-russ. Bauern,” November 23, 1929. Report to Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization (hereafter CMBC). From MCC-A, IX-02, box 4, file 4, 0006. Summary in Willms, At the Gates of Moscow, 134.

Note 7: B. Unruh to P. Braun, October 29, 1929, 1. On Col. J. S. Dennis, cf. Frank H. Epp, Mennonite Exodus (Altona, MB: Friesens, 1962), ch. 9.

Note 8: In B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht, November 23, 1929,” 3, 3b.

Note 9: W. Stein, “Bauernflucht aus Rußland,” Vossische Zeitung (November 3, 1929), 4. For all references to this newspaper, cf. link. Cf. Erwin Warkentin, “Germany’s Diplomatic Efforts during the 1929 Mennonite Immigration Crisis,” Mennonite Historian 31, no. 3 (September 2005), 4–5, 8 (link); idem, “The Mennonites before Moscow: The Notes of Dr. Otto Auhagen,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 26 (2008), 201–220 (link); also Willms, At the Gates of Moscow, 69. For the Kiel Passenger Lists: Part I: Mennonitische Rundschau 53, no. 2 (January 8, 1930), 6 (link); Part II: MR 53, no. 3 (January 15, 1930), 2 (link). Colin Neufeldt offers a gripping account of how this group in one suburb of Moscow was the first to receive exit visas and to leave the city (about 323) in 6 rail cars for Leningrad on October 30: “Flight to Moscow, 1929, 38f.

Note 10: D. Daly, “Russia blocks ruined German farmers’ flight,” Chicago Daily Tribune (November 4, 1929). Multiple newspapers were investigating this story; cf. E. Warkentin, “Mennonites before Moscow,” 210.

Note 11: B. Unruh, “Verzweifelte Selbsthilfe,” 113.

Note 12: “Request that Mennonites in Germany be brought to Dominion,” Lethbridge Herald (November 6, 1929), 1. See F. Epp, Mennonite Exodus, ch. 17.

Note 13: Curtius to the State Secretary of the Chancellery, November 6, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik, Serie B, vol. XIII (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1979), 227, no. 104 (link).

Note 14: Cf. Andreas Rödder, Stresemanns Erbe: Julius Curtius und die deutsche Außenpolitik, 1929–1931 (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1996), 152f. (link).

Note 15: “Request that Mennonites in Germany be brought to Dominion,” Lethbridge Herald (November 6, 1929) 1. See F. Epp, Mennonite Exodus, ch. 17.

Note 16: “Zurück in die Hölle?,” Vossische Zeitung, Morning Edition, no. 524 (November 6, 1929), 3.

Note 17: Maxwell Kratz to P. Hiebert, L. Mumaw and O. Miller, November 6, 1929, letter. From MCC-A, IX-01, box 7, file 7, 0003; “Russian Situation,” Gospel Herald 22, no. 34 (November 21, 1929), 689 (link).

Note 18: Cf. Walter Quiring, “Die Urenkel kehren heim: Die Massenflucht der rußlanddeutschen Bauern 1929,” Deutschtum im Ausland 22, no. 5 (May 1939), 272 (link).

Note 19: “383 Peasants, starved by Reds, huddle in Kiel,” Chicago Tribune (November 7, 1929).

Note 20: “Als zehntausende Russlanddeutsche fliehen mussten,” Frankfurter Zeitung (November 8, 1929); B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht, November 23, 1929,” 3; “Zurück in die Hölle?”

Note 21: B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht,” 5b.

Note 22: B. Unruh “Mitten im Sturm,” Mennonitische Blätter 76, no. 12 (December 1929), 106f. (link); also Mennonitische Rundschau 52, no. 50 (December 1929), 3 (link); translation in Willms, Gates of Moscow, 120–124.

Note 23: “9. November 1929, Kempff an das Auswärtige Amt” (Dokumente 4-5), Deutsche Hilfsmaßnahmen zugunsten der Auswanderung deutschstämmiger Flüchtlinge überwiegend mennonitischen Glaubens aus der Sowjetunion und ihre Ansiedlung in überseeischen Gebieten, 1929–1932. 23 Dokumente aus dem Politischen Archiv des Auswärtigen Amts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Archiv Fernheim, Paraguay. Anderson’s wired message to Forke, November 9, 1929, is copied in F. Epp, Mennonite Exodus, 247.

Note 24: B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht,” 5b.

Note 25: C. F. Claasen to Maxwell Kratz, November 23, 1929, letter (with clipping). From MCC-A, IX-02, box 4, file 3, 0020. Also Mennonitische Blätter 76, no. 12 (December 1929), 105 (link).

Note 26: “11. November 1929, Drahtbericht, Twardowski an das Auswärtige Amt,” Deutsche Hilfsmaßnahmen: Dokumente, 6–7; also “13. November 1929, Oskar Trautman an Julius Curtius,” Deutsche Hilfsmaßnahmen: Dokumente, 8–12.

Note 27: “11. November 1929, Twardowski an das Auswärtige Amt,” Deutsche Hilfsmaßnahmen: Dokumente, 6–7; “11. November 1929, Drahtbericht, Twardowski an das Auswärtige Amt,” also “13. November 1929, Oskar Trautman an Julius Curtius,” Reichskanzelei, “Die deutschstämmigen Kolonisten in Rußland,” Blatt 24 (slide 49).

Note 28: Cf. “Brüder in Not!,” Vossische Zeitung (Berlin), no. 536 (November 13, 1929), 6; Mennonitische Blätter 76, no. 12 (December 1929), 105 (link).

Note 29: Benjamin H. Unruh to Levi Mumaw, November 14, 1929. From MCC-A, IX-01-01, box 10, file 210036.

Note 30: B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht, November 23, 1929,” 8.

Note 31: B. Unruh, “Bericht III: Zur Massenflucht,” November 23, 1929, 4.

Note 32: “13. November 1929, Trautman an Curtius,” Deutsche Hilfsmaßnahmen: Dokumente, 8–12.

Note 33: On costs, cf. Curtius to the State Secretary of the Chancellery, November 6, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik, Serie B, XIII, 227, no. 104; 228 n.8; budget proposal, Nov 13, 1929, Reichskanzelei, “Die deutschstämmigen Kolonisten in Rußland,” 135, no. 66.

Note 34: F. Epp, Mennonite Exodus, 239.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany (with video),” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), December 30, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/12/1929-flight-of-mennonites-to-moscow-and.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C