Skip to main content

The Flight to Moscow 1929

In 1926, my grandfather’s sister Justina Fast (b. 1896) and her husband Peter Görzen moved from Krassikow, Neu Samara (Soviet Union) to village no. 5 Dejewka, Orenburg. “We thought we would live our lives here with our children secure in the hands of God. But the times were becoming turbulent,” Justina recalled. In May 1929 they travelled back to Krassikow for Pentecost to visit with her mother, brothers and their families. But when they returned to their home, she writes,

“… a large quota of grain was demanded of us. But we had nothing, and the harvest was not yet in. Then we heard that many were planning to move to Canada, including my three siblings with my mother, and my husband's three sisters too. My husband decided to go to Moscow first to see if it was possible and what was required for emigration. We made the decision to leave when the harvest was complete. At that time so many people were leaving [for Moscow], and early in September we sold everything we had. Only the beautiful house we were unable to sell; we left it standing, and I shed many tears over this. Immediately after the sale we left for Moscow [1,300 km]—early in September 1929. We expected to be out of the country soon thereafter, yet things did not happen as fast as we were expecting. There were so many families arriving in Moscow every day, that authorities gathered us in the street, asked what we wanted and who the instigator or group leaders were. People came from every direction, and all wanted to go to Canada.” (Note 1)

It was a desperate act of resistance to Soviet collectivization, education and religious policy that brought over 9,000 thousand Mennonite farmers to Moscow in fall 1929, together with another 4,000 German Lutherans and Catholics, with a small number of Baptists and Adventists (note 2).

The real economic growth they achieved in Ukraine and Russia under Lenin’s New Economic Policy (NEP) since 1921 with small-scale agriculture and all-Mennonite organizations had come to a quick end with Stalin’s solidification of power in the late 1920s.

The Stalin group’s “revolution from above” abandoned the limited free market capitalism of the NEP era, imposed rapid collectivization and large-scale mechanization of agriculture, announced the liquidation of wealthy peasants (kulaks) as a class and the elimination of all free market sales of grain, livestock or handicrafts, introduced low fixed prices for products, and enforced impossible quotas with heavy fines and imprisonment for non-compliance (note 3). All of this was designed to bring already desperate small farmers to a quick breaking point, and to bring to an end the traditional household economies of Mennonites and other farmers in Ukraine and Russia.

Mennonites spoke frequently of their “spiritual distress.” They accepted the removal of religious instruction from their schools only very reluctantly, and were appalled at the “anti-religious propaganda” that took its place and with the restrictions on public religious observance and teaching. “We must get out of this country if we do not want to allow our children to go to utter ruination economically and spiritually,” Halbstadt Elder Abram Klassen wrote to his Canadian counterparts (note 4).

In early summer 1929 news of a crack in the state’s restrictive emigration policy spread through Mennonite villages across the Soviet Union: twenty-five Mennonite families had received exit visas. They had made a personal request to M. I. Kalinin, President of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee and, only “after much urging and support” from the Chair of the Moscow Soviet Pyotr Smidovich, successfully left the Soviet Union. But “it was emphasized very strongly that under no circumstances would any further groups be allowed to depart in the next years,” according to Benjamin H. Unruh, spokesperson for Russian Mennonites in Germany and for the Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization in Europe, who guided their departure (note 5). 

Yet by mid-June Unruh was scrambling to find sponsorships in Canada for another seventy-four families. This news circulated and by the end of October more than 6,000 people—perhaps double, and largely Mennonites from Siberia—with belongings in hand descended upon Moscow in a massive flight attempt (note 6). Confident of support from relatives and coreligionists abroad and of the diplomatic goodwill of Germany, the would-be emigrants disposed of all their assets—mostly at rock bottom prices—and fled for Moscow.

The German embassy followed the dramatic developments in Moscow closely; since Germany’s humiliating defeat and territorial loss in the Great War, an emerging German identity as an ethno-cultural Volk across national borders and institutions had taken on a new imagined reality, which inspired strong loyalty toward beleaguered German minorities in the east (note 7). In this context, not only did the German embassy insist that the Soviet Union respect the rights of ethnic German farmers, but letters from private citizens requesting intervention inundated the Commissariat for Foreign Affairs (note 8). “The fate of these pioneers and colonists is very German and touches on the deepest questions of our ethnic peoplehood (Volkstum) in general,” one Berlin paper argued (note 9).

German ambassador in Moscow Herbert von Dirksen did not support asylum in Germany; this move could trigger a powerful attractional force for the remaining German farmers and their families in the Soviet Union (note 10)—as many as 700,000 or 800,000 individuals. These would be impossible to assimilate or resettle—though Nazi Germany would try to do this very thing ten years later with annexed Polish lands.

Rather, since 1922 Germany aimed to give only enough aid to Germans in the Soviet Union to squelch any desire for mass emigration (note 11). Von Dirksen even outlined in an August 1929 confidential memo the political value of ethnic Germans in Ukraine as a support base (Stützpunkt) for any future German ambitions, including the promotion economic and cultural ties (note 12). Five years earlier the German Consul in Ukraine had worked to block a mass evacuation of Mennonites for much the same reasons (note 13). To Germany’s embarrassment and to the danger of Mennonites in 1929 and later, much of this secret diplomatic correspondence had been leaked to Soviet sources and published mid-November (note 14). Nonetheless in August 1929 von Dirksen advised his department that immigration—if possible—should not be to Germany; maybe Canada or, if that path is blocked, to Paraguay or Chile. Canada was problematic for him insofar as farmers are settled in “checkerboard style, which is without a doubt a threat to the preservation of Germandom” (note 15). However Unruh was assured by the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) office in Hamburg that transit credits for Mennonites to Canada were available at the Russian Canadian Trade Association in Moscow (RU-KA-PA; note 16).

Peter and Justina Görzen had been in Moscow for a month when they wrote her siblings and mother “that the Russian government will allow [Mennonites] to emigrate.”

Peter Görzen was arrested in Moscow in 1929 and Justina and children remained behind. Her mother and siblings were successfully evacuated to Germany. I was privileged to correspond with her (living in Podolsk) in the early 1980s. She was able to tell me about my grandfather whom I had never met and their early life in Neu Samara.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: “Lebensverzeichnis unserer lieben Mutter, Justina Görzen, geborene Fast.” Annotated translation by Arnold Neufeldt-Fast: “Early Years and Flight to Moscow (1929). Autobiography of Justina Fast Görzen (Part I).

Note 2: For documentary links between the flight and local protests and mass resistance towards collectivization and dekulakization amongst Siberian Mennonites, cf. Detlef Brandes and Andrej I. Savin, Die Sibiriendeutschen im Sowjetstaat 1919–1938 (Essen: Klartext, 2001).

Note 3: Cf. R. W. Davies, “Stalin as Economic Policy Maker: Soviet Agriculture, 1931–1936,” in Stalin: A New History, edited by Sarah Davies and James R. Harris (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 121f.

Note 4: Abram Klassen, letter July 1, 1928, translated in David Toews to Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King, August 15, 1928, letter, from MCC-Akron, IX, box 3, file 7.

Note 5: Benjamin H. Unruh to Peter Braun, October 29, 1929, 1, letter, from Mennonite Library and Archives-Bethel College, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_91/folder_2/.

Note 6: See Harold Jantz’s comprehensive collection and translation of related materials: Flight: Mennonites facing the Soviet Empire in 1929/30, from the pages of the Mennonitische Rundschau (Winnipeg, MB: Eden Echoes, 2018).

Note 7: Cf. Rogers Brubaker, Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 117f.

Note 8: Cf. Lynne Viola, Peasant Rebels Under Stalin: Collectivization and the Culture of Peasant Resistance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), 261, no. 109.

Note 9: Bernhard Lamey, “Richtung Moskau—Kanada,” Vossische Zeitung, no. 522, November 5, 1929, 4 (link).

Note 10: Curtius to the State Secretary of the Chancellery, November 6, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik 1918–1945, Serie B: 1925–1933, vol. XIII (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1979), 227, no. 104 (link). On the fear of mass migration of Russian Germans, cf. James E. Castel, “The Russian Germans in the Interwar German National Imaginary,” Central European History 40 (2007), 455; Erwin Warkentin, “The Mennonites before Moscow: The Notes of Dr. Otto Auhagen,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 26 (2008), 209 (link).

Note 11: Documented in Maria Köhler-Baur, “Die deutsche Berichtserstattung über die Rußlanddeutschen. ‘Der Auslandsdeutsche’ 1920–1929,” in Deutsche in Rußland und in der Sowjetunion 1914–1941, edited by A. Eisfeld, V. Herdt, and B. Meissner (Berlin: LIT, 2007), 209f.

Note 12: Herbert von Dirksen to German Foreign Affairs, August 1, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik, Serie B: 1925–1933, vol. XII (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1978), 306 n.2, no. 141 (link). The German press echoed this interest; cf. Bernhard Lamey, “Richtung Moskau—Kanada: Deutsche irren durch die Welt,” Vossische Zeitung, no. 522, November 5, 1929, 4 (link). Generally, cf. Casteel, “Russian Germans in the Interwar German National Imaginary,” 448; 451.

Note 13: B. B. Janz, in John B. Toews, The Lost Fatherland: The Story of the Mennonite Emigration from Soviet Russia, 1921–1927 (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1967), 162 (link).

Note 14: W. Zechlin to State Secretary of Foreign Affairs Schubert, November 14, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik, Serie B, vol. XIII, 263f., no. 123. The leak was published in the Berlin-based pro-communist paper Die Rote Fahne (“Die Not der Deutschen in der USSR ein entlarvter Wahlschwindel!”), no. 231 (November 14, 1929), 1.

Note 15: Dirksen to Foreign Affairs, August 1, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik, Serie B, XII, 307, no. 141.

Note 16: Cf. Benjamin Unruh, November 1929, 1b, 2 [check]; idem, “Bericht II: Über Verhandlungen in Berlin, vom 19.10 bis 24.10.,” October 25, 1929, 2 (report), to Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization. From MCC-Akron, IX-02, box 4, file 4. Cf. also Jochen Oltmer, Migration und Politik in der Weimarer Republik (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005), 199, 206 (link); Henry J. Willms, ed., At the Gates of Moscow, translated by George G. Thielman (Yarrow, BC: Columbia, 1964), 133 (link).

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “The Flight to Moscow, 1929,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), December 27, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/12/the-flight-to-moscow-1929.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Invitation to the Russian Consulate, Danzig, January 19, 1788

B elow is one of the most important original Mennonite artifacts I have seen. It concerns January 19. The two land scouts Jacob Höppner and Johann Bartsch had returned to Danzig from Russia on November 10, 1787 with the Russian Immigration Agent, Georg von Trappe. Soon thereafter, Trappe had copies of the royal decree and agreement (Gnadenbrief) printed for distribution in the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig and other locations, dated December 29, 1787 ( see pic ; note 1 ). After the flyer was handed out to congregants in Danzig after worship on January 13, 1788, city councilors made the most bitter accusations against church elders for allowing Trappe and the Russian Consulate to do this; something similar had happened before ( note 2 ). In the flyer Trappe boasted that land scouts Höppner and Bartsch met not only with Gregory Potemkin, Catherine the Great’s vice-regent and administrator of New Russia, but also with “the Most Gracious Russian Monarch” herse...

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...

Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (Holodomor), 1932-1933

In 2008 the Canadian Parliament passed an act declaring the fourth Saturday in November as “Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (‘Holodomor’) Memorial Day” ( note 1 ). Southern Ukraine was arguably the worst affected region of the famine of 1932–33, where 30,000 to 40,000 Mennonites lived ( note 2 ). The number of famine-related deaths in Ukraine during this period are conservatively estimated at 3.5 million ( note 3 ). In the early 1930s Stalin feared growing “Ukrainian nationalism” and the possibility of “losing Ukraine” ( note 4 ). He was also suspicious of ethnic Poles and Germans—like Mennonites—in Ukraine, convinced of the “existence of an organized counter-revolutionary insurgent underground” in support of Ukrainian national independence ( note 5 ). Ukraine was targeted with a “lengthy schooling” designed to ruthlessly break the threat of Ukrainian nationalism and resistance, and this included Ukraine’s Mennonites (viewed simply as “Germans”). Various causes combined to bring on w...

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...

Four-Part Singing in Mennonite Schools and Church in Russia

The significance of singing instruction may seem trite, but it became a key vehicle in the Mennonite school curriculum for fostering a basic appreciation of the arts and for faith formation. In Johann Cornies’ circulated guidelines for teachers, singing was recommended as a means “to stimulate and enliven pious feelings” in the children—a guideline he copied directly from a German Catholic pedagogue and circulated freely under his own name ( note 1 ).  On January 26, 1846 Cornies distributed a curriculum regulation to all schools that mandated “singing by numbers ( Zahlen ) from the church hymnal” ( note 2 ). Attention to singing instruction in the schools precipitated significant and controversial changes in Mennonite liturgy. An 1854 visiting observer to the Bergthal Colony—a Chortitza daughter colony outside of Cornies’ purview—wrote: “Endlessly long hymns from the Gesangbuch (hymnal) were begun by the Vorsänger (song leader) of the congregation, and sung with so many flo...

"Between Monarchs" a lot can happen (like revolt). A Mennonite "Accession" Prayer for the Monarch

It is surprising for many to learn that Russian Mennonites sang the Russian national anthem "God save the Tsar" in special worship services ... frequently! We have a "Mennonite prayer" and sermon sample for the accession of the monarch ( Thronbesteigung ) or its anniversary, with closing prayer-- and another Mennonite sampler of a coronation ( Krönung ) prayer, sermon and closing prayer ( note 1 ). After 70 years with one monarch, the manual is made for a time like this--try sharing it with your Canadian Mennonite pastor ;) Technically there is no “between” monarchs: “The Queen is Dead. Long live the King!” But there is much that happens or can happen before the coronation of the new monarch. Including revolt. Mennonites in Molotschna had hosted Tsar Alexander I shortly before his death in 1825. Upon his death in December, Alexander's brother and heir Constantine declined succession, and prior to the coronation of the next brother Nicholas, some 3,000 rebel (mos...

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...

Eduard Wüst: A “Second Menno”?

Arguably the most significant outside religious influence on Mennonite s in the 19th century was the revivalist preaching of Eduard Wüst, a university-trained Württemberg Pietist minister installed by the separatist Evangelical Brethren Church in New Russia in 1843 ( note 1 ). With the end-time prophesies of a previous generation of Pietists (and many Mennonites) coming to naught, Wüst introduced Germans in this area of New Russia to the “New Pietism” and its more individualistic, emotional conversion experience and sermons on the free grace of God centred on the cross of Christ ( note 2 ). Wüst’s 1851 Christmas sermon series give a good picture of what was changing ( note 3 ). His core agenda was to dispel gloom (which maybe could describe more traditional Mennonites) and induce Christian joy. This is the root impulse of the Mennonite Brethren beginnings years later in 1860. “Satan is not entitled to present his own as the most joyful.” His people “sing, jump, leap ( hüpfen ) ...