Skip to main content

The Flight to Moscow 1929

In 1926, my grandfather’s sister Justina Fast (b. 1896) and her husband Peter Görzen moved from Krassikow, Neu Samara (Soviet Union) to village no. 5 Dejewka, Orenburg. “We thought we would live our lives here with our children secure in the hands of God. But the times were becoming turbulent,” Justina recalled. In May 1929 they travelled back to Krassikow for Pentecost to visit with her mother, brothers and their families. But when they returned to their home, she writes,

“… a large quota of grain was demanded of us. But we had nothing, and the harvest was not yet in. Then we heard that many were planning to move to Canada, including my three siblings with my mother, and my husband's three sisters too. My husband decided to go to Moscow first to see if it was possible and what was required for emigration. We made the decision to leave when the harvest was complete. At that time so many people were leaving [for Moscow], and early in September we sold everything we had. Only the beautiful house we were unable to sell; we left it standing, and I shed many tears over this. Immediately after the sale we left for Moscow [1,300 km]—early in September 1929. We expected to be out of the country soon thereafter, yet things did not happen as fast as we were expecting. There were so many families arriving in Moscow every day, that authorities gathered us in the street, asked what we wanted and who the instigator or group leaders were. People came from every direction, and all wanted to go to Canada.” (Note 1)

It was a desperate act of resistance to Soviet collectivization, education and religious policy that brought over 9,000 thousand Mennonite farmers to Moscow in fall 1929, together with another 4,000 German Lutherans and Catholics, with a small number of Baptists and Adventists (note 2).

The real economic growth they achieved in Ukraine and Russia under Lenin’s New Economic Policy (NEP) since 1921 with small-scale agriculture and all-Mennonite organizations had come to a quick end with Stalin’s solidification of power in the late 1920s.

The Stalin group’s “revolution from above” abandoned the limited free market capitalism of the NEP era, imposed rapid collectivization and large-scale mechanization of agriculture, announced the liquidation of wealthy peasants (kulaks) as a class and the elimination of all free market sales of grain, livestock or handicrafts, introduced low fixed prices for products, and enforced impossible quotas with heavy fines and imprisonment for non-compliance (note 3). All of this was designed to bring already desperate small farmers to a quick breaking point, and to bring to an end the traditional household economies of Mennonites and other farmers in Ukraine and Russia.

Mennonites spoke frequently of their “spiritual distress.” They accepted the removal of religious instruction from their schools only very reluctantly, and were appalled at the “anti-religious propaganda” that took its place and with the restrictions on public religious observance and teaching. “We must get out of this country if we do not want to allow our children to go to utter ruination economically and spiritually,” Halbstadt Elder Abram Klassen wrote to his Canadian counterparts (note 4).

In early summer 1929 news of a crack in the state’s restrictive emigration policy spread through Mennonite villages across the Soviet Union: twenty-five Mennonite families had received exit visas. They had made a personal request to M. I. Kalinin, President of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee and, only “after much urging and support” from the Chair of the Moscow Soviet Pyotr Smidovich, successfully left the Soviet Union. But “it was emphasized very strongly that under no circumstances would any further groups be allowed to depart in the next years,” according to Benjamin H. Unruh, spokesperson for Russian Mennonites in Germany and for the Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization in Europe, who guided their departure (note 5). 

Yet by mid-June Unruh was scrambling to find sponsorships in Canada for another seventy-four families. This news circulated and by the end of October more than 6,000 people—perhaps double, and largely Mennonites from Siberia—with belongings in hand descended upon Moscow in a massive flight attempt (note 6). Confident of support from relatives and coreligionists abroad and of the diplomatic goodwill of Germany, the would-be emigrants disposed of all their assets—mostly at rock bottom prices—and fled for Moscow.

The German embassy followed the dramatic developments in Moscow closely; since Germany’s humiliating defeat and territorial loss in the Great War, an emerging German identity as an ethno-cultural Volk across national borders and institutions had taken on a new imagined reality, which inspired strong loyalty toward beleaguered German minorities in the east (note 7). In this context, not only did the German embassy insist that the Soviet Union respect the rights of ethnic German farmers, but letters from private citizens requesting intervention inundated the Commissariat for Foreign Affairs (note 8). “The fate of these pioneers and colonists is very German and touches on the deepest questions of our ethnic peoplehood (Volkstum) in general,” one Berlin paper argued (note 9).

German ambassador in Moscow Herbert von Dirksen did not support asylum in Germany; this move could trigger a powerful attractional force for the remaining German farmers and their families in the Soviet Union (note 10)—as many as 700,000 or 800,000 individuals. These would be impossible to assimilate or resettle—though Nazi Germany would try to do this very thing ten years later with annexed Polish lands.

Rather, since 1922 Germany aimed to give only enough aid to Germans in the Soviet Union to squelch any desire for mass emigration (note 11). Von Dirksen even outlined in an August 1929 confidential memo the political value of ethnic Germans in Ukraine as a support base (Stützpunkt) for any future German ambitions, including the promotion economic and cultural ties (note 12). Five years earlier the German Consul in Ukraine had worked to block a mass evacuation of Mennonites for much the same reasons (note 13). To Germany’s embarrassment and to the danger of Mennonites in 1929 and later, much of this secret diplomatic correspondence had been leaked to Soviet sources and published mid-November (note 14). Nonetheless in August 1929 von Dirksen advised his department that immigration—if possible—should not be to Germany; maybe Canada or, if that path is blocked, to Paraguay or Chile. Canada was problematic for him insofar as farmers are settled in “checkerboard style, which is without a doubt a threat to the preservation of Germandom” (note 15). However Unruh was assured by the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) office in Hamburg that transit credits for Mennonites to Canada were available at the Russian Canadian Trade Association in Moscow (RU-KA-PA; note 16).

Peter and Justina Görzen had been in Moscow for a month when they wrote her siblings and mother “that the Russian government will allow [Mennonites] to emigrate.”

Peter Görzen was arrested in Moscow in 1929 and Justina and children remained behind. Her mother and siblings were successfully evacuated to Germany. I was privileged to correspond with her (living in Podolsk) in the early 1980s. She was able to tell me about my grandfather whom I had never met and their early life in Neu Samara.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: “Lebensverzeichnis unserer lieben Mutter, Justina Görzen, geborene Fast.” Annotated translation by Arnold Neufeldt-Fast: “Early Years and Flight to Moscow (1929). Autobiography of Justina Fast Görzen (Part I).

Note 2: For documentary links between the flight and local protests and mass resistance towards collectivization and dekulakization amongst Siberian Mennonites, cf. Detlef Brandes and Andrej I. Savin, Die Sibiriendeutschen im Sowjetstaat 1919–1938 (Essen: Klartext, 2001).

Note 3: Cf. R. W. Davies, “Stalin as Economic Policy Maker: Soviet Agriculture, 1931–1936,” in Stalin: A New History, edited by Sarah Davies and James R. Harris (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 121f.

Note 4: Abram Klassen, letter July 1, 1928, translated in David Toews to Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King, August 15, 1928, letter, from MCC-Akron, IX, box 3, file 7.

Note 5: Benjamin H. Unruh to Peter Braun, October 29, 1929, 1, letter, from Mennonite Library and Archives-Bethel College, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_91/folder_2/.

Note 6: See Harold Jantz’s comprehensive collection and translation of related materials: Flight: Mennonites facing the Soviet Empire in 1929/30, from the pages of the Mennonitische Rundschau (Winnipeg, MB: Eden Echoes, 2018).

Note 7: Cf. Rogers Brubaker, Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 117f.

Note 8: Cf. Lynne Viola, Peasant Rebels Under Stalin: Collectivization and the Culture of Peasant Resistance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), 261, no. 109.

Note 9: Bernhard Lamey, “Richtung Moskau—Kanada,” Vossische Zeitung, no. 522, November 5, 1929, 4 (link).

Note 10: Curtius to the State Secretary of the Chancellery, November 6, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik 1918–1945, Serie B: 1925–1933, vol. XIII (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1979), 227, no. 104 (link). On the fear of mass migration of Russian Germans, cf. James E. Castel, “The Russian Germans in the Interwar German National Imaginary,” Central European History 40 (2007), 455; Erwin Warkentin, “The Mennonites before Moscow: The Notes of Dr. Otto Auhagen,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 26 (2008), 209 (link).

Note 11: Documented in Maria Köhler-Baur, “Die deutsche Berichtserstattung über die Rußlanddeutschen. ‘Der Auslandsdeutsche’ 1920–1929,” in Deutsche in Rußland und in der Sowjetunion 1914–1941, edited by A. Eisfeld, V. Herdt, and B. Meissner (Berlin: LIT, 2007), 209f.

Note 12: Herbert von Dirksen to German Foreign Affairs, August 1, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik, Serie B: 1925–1933, vol. XII (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1978), 306 n.2, no. 141 (link). The German press echoed this interest; cf. Bernhard Lamey, “Richtung Moskau—Kanada: Deutsche irren durch die Welt,” Vossische Zeitung, no. 522, November 5, 1929, 4 (link). Generally, cf. Casteel, “Russian Germans in the Interwar German National Imaginary,” 448; 451.

Note 13: B. B. Janz, in John B. Toews, The Lost Fatherland: The Story of the Mennonite Emigration from Soviet Russia, 1921–1927 (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1967), 162 (link).

Note 14: W. Zechlin to State Secretary of Foreign Affairs Schubert, November 14, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik, Serie B, vol. XIII, 263f., no. 123. The leak was published in the Berlin-based pro-communist paper Die Rote Fahne (“Die Not der Deutschen in der USSR ein entlarvter Wahlschwindel!”), no. 231 (November 14, 1929), 1.

Note 15: Dirksen to Foreign Affairs, August 1, 1929, in Akten zur deutschen auswärtigen Politik, Serie B, XII, 307, no. 141.

Note 16: Cf. Benjamin Unruh, November 1929, 1b, 2 [check]; idem, “Bericht II: Über Verhandlungen in Berlin, vom 19.10 bis 24.10.,” October 25, 1929, 2 (report), to Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization. From MCC-Akron, IX-02, box 4, file 4. Cf. also Jochen Oltmer, Migration und Politik in der Weimarer Republik (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005), 199, 206 (link); Henry J. Willms, ed., At the Gates of Moscow, translated by George G. Thielman (Yarrow, BC: Columbia, 1964), 133 (link).

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “The Flight to Moscow, 1929,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), December 27, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/12/the-flight-to-moscow-1929.html. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The End of Schardau (and other Molotschna villages), 1941

My grandmother was four-years old when her parents moved from Petershagen, Molotschna to Schardau in 1908. This story is larger than that of Schardau, but tells how this village and many others in Molotschna were evacuated by Stalin days before the arrival of German troops in 1941. -ANF The bridge across the Dnieper at Chortitza was destroyed by retreating Soviet troops on August 18, 1941 and the hydroelectric dam completed near Einlage in 1932 was also dynamited by NKVD personnel—killing at least 20,000 locals downstream, and forcing the Germans to cross further south at Nikopol. For the next six-and-a-half weeks, the old Mennonite settlement area of Chortitza was continuously shelled by Soviet troops from Zaporozhje on the east side of the river ( note 1 ). The majority of Russian Germans in Crimea and Ukraine paid dearly for Germany’s Blitzkrieg and plans for racially-based population resettlements. As early as August 3, 1941, the Supreme Command of the Soviet Forces received noti...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...
Post a Comment
Read more

What were Molotschna Mennonites reading in the early 1840s?

Johann Cornies expanded his Agricultural Society School library in Ohrloff to become a lending library “for the instruction and better enlightenment of every adult resident.” The library was overseen by the Agricultural Society; in 1845, patrons across the colony paid 1 ruble annually to access its growing collection of 355 volumes (see note 1 ). The great majority of the volumes were in German, but the library included Russian and some French volumes, with a large selection of handbooks and periodicals on agronomy and agriculture—even a medical handbook ( note 2 ). Philosophical texts included a German translation of George Combe’s The Constitution of Man ( note 3 ) and its controversial theory of phrenology, and the political economist Johann H. G. Justi’s Ergetzungen der vernünftigen Seele —which give example of the high level of reading and reflection amongst some colonists. The library’s teaching and reference resources included a history of science and technology with an accomp...
Post a Comment
Read more

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 2 of 4 to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF In a few short months the American government will start to fulfill its campaign promises to round up and deport undocumented immigrants. The responsible cabinet members have already been appointed. By early Spring 2025, Mennonite pastors/leaders who supported Trump will need to speak to and address the matter in their congregations. It will be difficult to find words. How might they prepare? Sometimes a template from the past is helpful. To that end, I offer my summary of a text by retired Mennonite pastor and conference leader Gustav Kraemer. (There is a nice entry on him in the Mennonite Encyclopedia,  GAMEO ). My summary is faithful to the German original, 1938. With only a few minor changes, it could be useful for the coming year. Adaptations are mostly in square brackets, with the key at the bottom of the post. ...
Post a Comment
Read more