Skip to main content

Walking with a Limp: Isbrand Janzen (1863-1944)

The surviving photographs of my great-grandfather Isbrand Janzen (b. 1863) consistently give profile to his cane.

Our earliest photograph of Isbrand is about 1902, age 38 in Spat, Crimea. His cane or crutch is on prominent display and already part of his identity. He married late—age 32 in 1893; maybe because of his leg? His wife was the widow Elisabeth Plönnert Böse, and she brought three children into the marriage.


In their fifth year of marriage the couple experienced a double grief: their two children died within nine days each other, ages 1½ and 3, January 1898 (note 1).

Both Isbrand and Elisabeth were born in the Molotschna Colony in the village of Petershagen; Elisabeth’s parents were more recent immigrants (note 2). Isbrand’s grandfather was one of the pioneer settlers of the village.

How and when Isbrand came to Crimea is unclear. In 1860 after the Crimean War, the Molotschna Colony purchased 40,000 desiatini of land in Crimea for a daughter colony. By the start of World War I, approximately 3,500 Mennonites were living in Crimea, and 4,817 Mennonites (892 families) in 1926 across 70 villages (note 4).

Isbrand was not an estate owner, but the first family portrait indicates that they were materially comfortable. The second family photo was taken ca. 1907. Again, the cane is profiled as part of his identity. The youngest in the photograph would die skating on a pond with two Teichrob boys in 1914.


During the Russian Revolution the Crimean Peninsula was the last hold-out of the White Army, and so the population was not raided by the Makhno anarchists as in the mother colonies. But the Revolution left destruction everywhere.

Starting 1921 Lenin’s New Economic Policy (NEP) allowed for some small-scale private farms and cooperative organizations, and Mennonites were quick to try and rebuild within the limits imposed; the Crimean Mennonite Agricultural Society was soon organized (note 5). The famine of 1922 took on horrific proportions (note 6).

American Mennonite Relief came largely through the Crimean port city of Sevastopol, and Mennonites in Spat—one of the largest Mennonite villages in Crimea, with high school, mills, churches. etc.—benefitted.

When the American Fordson tractors arrived, there was a lack of specialists to operate and maintain them, and the Agricultural Society made an effort to train "tractorists” (note 7). The small freedoms of the early 1920s did not last long and, like the sister society in Molotschna, the Society was soon forced to close (for a sample “poison” letter to the Bolshevik German newspaper for Crimea in 1926, cf. note 8).

For Crimean Mennonites, their greatest fear was for their children’s future, and this grew from year to year. In 1928, Saat (Communist “Seed”), the organ of the Central Committee of the Communist Youth League of Ukraine published the following article: “A Declaration of Crimean Mennonite Youth to the Soviet Government: 'Youth Expose the Hoax of the Preachers. The Mennonite youth joins the ranks of the active defenders of the S.S.S.R.'" The article claimed that forty-two Crimean Mennonites signed their readiness to enter military service with arms. The claims of the paper were dubious at best, but the probability that their youth would rapidly distance themselves from church was real and an ever-present anxiety. Isbrand’s children were still part of that demographic (note 9).

Isbrand and family were among those who would make one last desperate attempt to flee the Soviet Union via Moscow. 4,000 Mennonites had already descended on the capital by October 29, 1929. A Secret Police (GPU) report based on a sample survey of five village councils in the Simferopol District (Crimea) dated November 5, 1929, listed 50 families that were ready to leave and another 314 people who were in the process of selling their property (note 10). By mid-November that number had mushroomed to over 12,000 (note 11).

Isbrand and his wife and four adult children and few grandchildren were among those who were successfully transported to Germany, with hopes to be in Canada soon (note 12). Perhaps because of his leg, he and wife Elisabeth and their two unmarried adult daughters were not given clearance to enter Canada.

Their son Isbrand I. Janzen (Jr.) and his step-son Martin Boese with families left for Canada from Hamburg on April 1, 1930, but not before one of the grandchildren (Willi, age 10 months) died in an epidemic outbreak in the refugee housing (note 13).

A 1930 MCC photograph from Germany shows a group of men planning--perhaps for the new settlement in Paraguay—and Isbrand is at the table, age 66 (note 14). The end of the crutch is barely visible under the table. On July 11, 1930, one day before departure, the group crafted a letter to MCC, indicating that their flight from their homes was for the sake of the faith of their children. They knew that they were among the fortunate ones to be saved “and to have found a temporary warm welcome in our old motherland [Germany]. As is well known, our destination was Canada ... but since the situation is such that only a limited number of our co-sufferers could enter Canada, we are deeply moved that the Mennonites of the USA take such a great interest in our fate and extend their helping hand to us with advice and deeds.” (Note 15)


With the steamship "Villagarcia," MCC’s fourth Paraguay transport departed on July 12, 1930 from Hamburg. These 64 families of 353 individuals arrived in Buenos Aires on August 9, prepared to settle into three new villages of 25 families each (villages nos. 9, 10 and 11). Of the 1,572 refugees that were transported and settled in Paraguay by MCC in 1930, 585 were from Ukraine or Crimea (note 16).


Isbrand’s family settled in village no. 10, Rosenort, Fernheim Colony, Gran Chaco. Very soon a significant epidemic broke out among the new settlers—all living in the most primitive conditions and without a medical doctor.

Isbrand’s wife Elisabeth was one of the first to die. His daughter Helena would soon marry Jakob Fast also in village no. 10, whose wife and child also died from the Fernheim epidemic—all before Christmas 1930 (note 17). Their first child was my father, Peter Fast—Isbrand’s first grandchild in Paraguay.


This family would be among those who were disappointed with the conditions and prospects in Fernheim and—without options to immigrate to Canada or return to Germany—they sought to establish a new colony in east Paraguay, Friesland in 1937 (note 18). From 1933 until the end of the war, many in Fernheim and the majority of those in Friesland were taken up with excitement for National Socialism (note 19). The community was still very poor when Isbrand died in Friesland, 1944. He had spent the last years of his life in the household of daughter Elisabeth Janzen Peters.


His final portrait has an almost artistic quality. But the crutch is missing as he sits on his bed. His handicap was part of his identity. I think of the biblical figure of Jacob—we are told he wrestled with God and angels and was left with a limp … and a blessing for his descendants.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: On Mennonite child mortality rates in Russia, cf. my previous post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/the-cycle-of-time-and-maternal-and.html.

Note 2: For background on the Plönnert /Plennert Mennonite name, cf. see my previous post (forthcoming).

Note 3: On the Mennonite experience during the Crimean War, cf. my previous post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/mennonites-and-crimean-war-1853-56.html.

Note 4: In Adolf Ehrt, Das Mennonitentum in Rußland von seiner Einwanderung bis zur Gegenwart (Berlin-Leipzig: Belz, 1932), 78, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/?file=Pis/Ehrt.pdf.

Note 5: On the Mennonite response to Lenin’s New Economic Plan, cf. my previous post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/1921-formation-of-union-of-citizens-of.html.

Note 6: On the famine of 1921 and 1922 in Ukraine and the impact on the Mennonite communities, cf. my previous posts (forthcoming).

Note 7: On the Crimean Mennonite Agricultural Society, cf. Martin Durksen, Die Krim war unsere Heimat (Winnipeg, MB: Christian Press, 1977), 177f. https://archive.org/details/DieKrimWarUnsereHeimOCROpt/page/n177/mode/2up. Cf. also my previous posts (forthcoming)

Note 8: "Aus der Krim. Spat. 55,000 Rubel Defizit im mennonitischen Verein," Das Neue Dorf, 63 (13) (1926), 5, https://martin-opitz-bibliothek.de/de/elektronischer-lesesaal?action=book&bookId=via000515#lg=1&slide=0.

Note 9: Cf. "Deklaration mennonitischer Jugendlicher der Krim an die Sowjet-Regierung," Saat no. 7/8 (Novemer 7, 1928), cited by Ehrt, Das Mennonitentum in Rußland, 146. For a selection of Saat issues from 1928, cf. https://kat.martin-opitz-bibliothek.de/vufind/Search/Results?lookfor=saat&type=AllFields&daterange%5B%5D=publishDate&publishDatefrom=1921&publishDateto=1931.

Note 10: Cited in Detlef Brandes and Andrej I. Savin, eds., Die Sibiriendeutschen im Sowjetstaat 1919–1938 (Essen: Klartext, 2001), 296.

Note 11: On the flight to Moscow, cf. my previous posts (forthcoming; see also Table of Contents).

Note 12: On the refugee experience in Germany, cf. my previous posts (forthcoming).

Note 13: On Canada’s restrictive measures, and the difficulties for entering Canada in 1930, cf. my previous posts (forthcoming).

Note 14: On MCC’s flurry of activity to resettle this group, cf. my previous post (forthcoming), as well as the passenger lists compiled by Ron Isaak: “Mennonite Passenger lists for Refugee Transport to Paraguay in 1930,” http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/latin/paraguay1930.htm; AND https://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/latin/paraguaycombined.htm.

Note 15: "An das M.C.C. USA, “Dankschreiben der vierten nach Paraguay gehenden Gruppe,“ MCC-Akron, IX3-1, fox 1, file 6, document 0004.

Note 16: On the transport to Paraguay, cf. my previous post (forthcoming); also: Harold S. Bender to Max Kratz, letter, July 14, 1930, MCC-Akron archives, IX3-1, Box 3, file 80003.

Note 17: On the Fernheim epidemic, see my previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/what-does-it-cost-to-settle-refugee.html.

Note 18: On the letters sent by grandmother, Isbrand’s daughter Helene, to siblings in Canada, see my previous post (forthcoming).

Note 19: On the Nazi influence in the Mennonite colonies of Fernheim and Friesland beginning 1933, see my previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2022/09/eradicating-communist-spirit-in-young.html.


Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
1 comment
Read more

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...
Post a Comment
Read more