Skip to main content

Widow Penner’s Jewish Husband and the Litzmannstadt Ghetto, 1944

After 35,000 Mennonite were evacuated from Ukraine in 1943-44, they were all brought to German-annexed Poland where after a few months they were naturalized as German citizens. This process included racial and genetic-biological assessment by so-called race experts of the Immigration Central Office (EWZ). Nazi Germany was especially interested in their “Nordic blood purity,” absence of mixed marriages, racial fecundity and their long commitment to German language and culture while living in the east (note 1). The naturalization process for Mennonites was almost always unobjectionable, even hundreds with “Jewish names” like Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, David and Sarah were “strongly encouraged” to officially adopt Germanic names (note 2).

In 1956 Gerhard J. Klassen wrote to the Canadian Mennonitische Rundschau recalling his close call with death at a Nazi-SS run resettler camp in April 1944 at Hermannsbad, Warthegau (note 3, today Ciechocinek, Poland). And he also noted the experience at the camp of a Jew who was married to the Mennonite “Widow Penner.”

Klassen’s crisis erupted when a German naturalization officer concluded that Klassen must be Jewish. All were required to sign a form affirming that there was no trace of Jewish blood in their families, but Klassen’s list of ancestors seemed to indicate another story. The official thought that Klassen’s mother’s very Mennonite maiden name—“Elias”—was Jewish, given its similarity to the name of the Old Testament prophet “Elijah.” The official with the Immigration Central Office (EWZ) of the Ethnic German Liaison Office (Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle; VoMi) and responsible for naturalization decisions “jumped out of his armchair and shouted: ‘What? Elias ascended to heaven, and now you present yourself to be the second Elias? You are a Jew! Away with you!’”

After unsuccessful explanations and reassurances that he was of German lineage, Klassen thought his fate was sealed. Moments earlier the naturalization officials had just praised him: “Things seemed to be going very well for us—none of the names of parents or children had to be changed. ‘You have chosen names so carefully,’ they said repeatedly. ‘There is not a Jewish name among them!’”

Klassen however was saved by a second VoMi official who had initially drawn similar conclusions about a Mennonite “Zacharias” family, and he intervened: “I would regard this family as Germans and advise you to naturalize them. Just now a family with the Jewish name ‘Zacharias’ stood before me, and I believed them [that they were Mennonite].’" Klassen wrote: "That was our salvation.”

But in those terrifying moments, memories flashed before Klassen’s eyes: a twenty-year-old German soldier who boasted to him in his village of Kronsweide in Ukraine of killing 180 Jews with his very own rifle (note 4); seeing the mass Jewish killing- and burial site in large ditch (tank trap) outside of Halbstadt near Tokmak (note 5)—and then a horrible event in their camp earlier that week:

“Hadn't we seen this hostility towards the Jews ourselves here in the [resettler] camp a few days ago? The deaf-mute man with Jewish ancestry who had married a widow Penner in Blumenort [Molotschna] was taken from the camp and his wife never saw him again. In Halbstadt they had released him at her request, but here they said, ‘He has Jewish blood after all and has to go.’ All this and much more rushed through our minds in those moments.”

There are sufficient clues in this stunning paragraph that allows us to unfold this story further. A search of the profile notes in the Russian Mennonite genealogy database GRanDMA quickly turns up the Blumenort couple at Hermannsbad and the links to related EWZ papers: shortly after Luise Penner’s (b. 1878) first husband (also a Penner) died in 1917, she married Samuel Dunajewski, b. 1887, "a Jew" (note 6).

Klassen gives two additional, important details. First, Dunajewski had been arrested by the occupying German forces in the predominantly Mennonite settlement area of Molotschna, now named after its central village, Halbstadt. This would have occurred sometime between October 1941 and evacuation from Ukraine two years later. Then he was released “at her request.” This would have been highly unusual. Perhaps Dunajewski was “only partially” Jewish, that is, with a Mennonite mother; after all, he was born in the Mennonite village of Ohrloff, Molotschna. Perhaps this saved him, but we do not know.

Second, Klassen notes that Widow Penner's Jewish husband was a “deaf mute.” Mennonites were extraordinarily proud of “their” school for the deaf started in Blumenort (1885) and then properly established with a large building in Tiege (1890), adjacent to Ohrloff (Mary School for the Deaf; Marientaubstummenschule), where Dunajewski was born. Mennonites donated generously to this favoured charity—especially after it became clear that deaf children too could understand and “hear" the gospel” and be baptized upon confession of faith (note 7).

There is every reason to think that Dunajewski was a student at the Mennonite school for the deaf. Moreover, it is not completely unimaginable that Dunajewski was a baptized Mennonite with Jewish background. In fact, Widow Penner's EWZ indicates that his religious confession is "Mennonite". He had survived Nazi German rule until April 25, 1944—and that is unusual—perhaps because he was "Mennonite" by faith.

Nonetheless, he was taken from his wife at the Warthegau resettler camp. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) records indicate that a Samuel Dunajewski was sent to the Jewish ghetto in Litzmannstadt (about 150 km south of Hermannsbad) where he died shortly thereafter on June 13, 1944 (note 8). It is an unusual name—there are not multiple individuals in the Holocaust records with that same name. Tragically the name, spelling, place and the time match our Molotschna Dunajewski very well.

The USHMM summarizes briefly these last months of the Jewish Ghetto in Litzmanstadt (Lodz):

“In the spring of 1944, the N@zis decided to destroy the Lodz ghetto. By then, Lodz was the last remaining ghetto in German-occupied Poland, with a population of approximately 75,000 Jews in May 1944. In June and July 1944 the Germans resumed deportations from Lodz, and about 7,000 Jews were deported to Chelmno. The ghetto residents were told that they were being transferred to work camps in Germany. The Germans deported almost all of the surviving ghetto residents to the Auschwitz-Birkenau killing center in August 1944.” (Note 9)

The brief recollection by G. J. Klassen opens a small window on the horrific aspects of Nazi Germany and its worldview, as well as the registration procedures experienced—normally flawlessly—by thousands of Mennonites. The story of Luise Penner and her husband Samuel Dunajewski shows again that these “racial experts” of the Ethnic German Liaison Office (VoMi) had the power over life or death with their racial, genetic and ethnic assessments. The story is also a welcome reminder of the pioneering schools created by the Mennonite community before the revolution, and of the lives the Maria School for the Deaf transformed. In particular, the story makes one want to know more about this older “mixed couple” and their life in Blumenort under German occupation, and of a spouse who saved her Jewish husband from certain death at that point.

This larger blog includes many posts that make reference to Litzmannstadt (note 10), because almost all of the 35,000 Mennonite resettlers from Ukraine 1943-44 were funneled through the city’s VoMi reception facilities. Yet this is the first to connect the Mennonite story and the massive ghetto at Litzmannstadt.

With the Klassen-Penner-Dunajewski story, however, the Litzmannstadt ghetto clearly becomes part of this larger Mennonite story. It is now longer possible to tell the story of "the Great Trek" out of Ukraine well or fully without narrating this episode. Minimally, we will always need the caveat: Salvation for Mennonites in Warthegau was for Mennonites of German lineage alone.

---Notes---

Note 1: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/08/mennonites-highly-attractive-and.html.

Note 2: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/removal-of-old-testament-names-after.html. On the Warthegau resettler camps, see previous posts linked in the Table of Contents, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/p/table-of-contents.html. Note that most Mennonites were naturalized in the mobile EWZ naturalization train cars that were brought to areas of with resettler camps; cf. previous post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/mobile-immigration-central-office-ewz.html.

Note 3: Gerhard Joh. Klassen [b. 1889, GRanDMA #1031627], “Elia oder Elias? Erlebnis von unserer Einbürgerung in das ‘Großdeutsche Reich’ in Polen,” Mennonitische Rundschau 79, no. 25 (June 6, 1956), 5, https://archive.org/details/die-mennonitische-rundschau_1956-06-06_79_23/page/4/mode/2up.

Note 4: The soldier may have been referring to actions before his arrival in the predominantly Mennonite Chortitza District of Ukraine, for there were no Jews in Kronsweide either before or after German occupation. Nearby Einlage had 633 Jews immediately prior to occupation, but most fled east before the arrival of German forces. However there was a mass killing of some 3,700 Jews just outside of Zaporizhzhia in March 1942 (“Zaporozhye,” Yad Vashem World Holocaust Remembrance Center, https://collections.yadvashem.org/en/untold-stories/community/14621812-Zaporozhye). Sources: Kronsweide Village Report, Rayon Chortitza, Bundesarchiv (BA) R6/622, Mappe 86, May 1942; Einlage Village Report, Rayon Chortitza, BA R6/621, Mappe 83, May 1942, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/. On the handful of Einlage Jews present upon German arrival, cf. Heinrich Bergen, ed., Einlage: Chronik des Dorfes Kitschkas, 1789-1943 (Saskatoon, Sask.: Self-published, 2010), 80; idem, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943: Ein Denkmal (Regina, SK: Self-published, 2008), 364; 365.

Note 5: On these killings, outside Halbstadt (Molotschna) near Tokmak, see: “Soviet Report about the mass murder of Jews in Molochansk,” Yad Vashem Archives, M.37/293; TsGAOOu 57-4-14, https://collections.yadvashem.org/en/untold-stories/killing-site/14626570; AND https://collections.yadvashem.org/en/untold-stories/commemoration/14625235. On Jews and Mennonites during German occupation of Ukraine generally, see also: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/06/judeo-bolshevism-thesis-and-mennonites.html; AND https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/06/judeo-bolshevism-thesis-and-mennonites.html; AND https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/the-tinkelstein-family-of-chortitza.html.

Note 6: Cf. Luise Penner (GRanDMA #1189660) with link to one page of Penner’s EWZ form (A3342 EWZ50, folder B030, frame 0520).

Note 7: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/should-holy-baptism-be-offered-to-deaf.html. See also brief entry in GAMEO: https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Marientaubstummenschule_(Tiege,_Molotschna_Mennonite_Settlement,_Zaporizhia_Oblast,_Ukraine).

Note 8: See entry (pic) for Samuel Dunajewski, “Holocaust Survivors and Victims Database,” Rejestr Zgonow (Death Register), ID: 37603_RG-15.083M, The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, https://www.ushmm.org/online/hsv/person_view.php?PersonId=6302225; AND https://www.ushmm.org/online/hsv/source_view.php?SourceId=37603.

Note 9: Cf. The US Holocaust Memorial Museum, https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/lod.

Note 10: See note 2 above, in particular: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/delousingnaked-in-litzmannstadt-odz.html.  

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Widow Penner's Jewish Husband and the Litzmannstadt Ghetto," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), November 4, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/widow-penners-jewish-husband-and.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Immigration to Canada, 1923: Background

In April 1921 Mennonites in the Caucasus and Don Region officially petitioned Moscow for permissions to emigrate—which Lenin had “flatly refused.” Their rationale was more than economic. “The disruption of economic conditions leads to impoverishment, which again goes hand in hand with the degradation of morals and has an alarming impact on our youth, who are also constantly exposed to the pressure of brutal and ruthless agitation on the part of those in power. … This decay of our spiritual and economic goods will only become greater and more ruinous.” ( Note 1 ) Later that year and some months before the large-scale feeding operations could begin in the Soviet Union, American Mennonite Relief (AMR) commissioner A.J. Miller petitioned the Soviet Embassy in London for exit permissions for 20,000 Mennonites ( note 1b) . He was unsuccessful. Nonetheless in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, key Mennonite leaders took a decision to work toward the re...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...