Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

In December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay (note 1)

In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins.

In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” (note 2). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the German people” (note 3).

In this context Mennonites were an interesting group to study because they had preserved their Germanic culture and identity as a minority group for generations abroad, with little marriage outside their circle. Mennonite ministers and leaders from both groups were keen to cooperate. The study was published a year after Hitler took power; Mennonite genealogist Dr. Kurt Kauenhowen claimed it “is indisputably the most important biological contribution to the history of German Mennonites to date” (note 4).

Medical technicians from Berlin’s Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics and the University of Kiel carried out the anthropological examinations and surveys January 1930 with 1,271 of the Mennonites housed at the Hammerstein, Mölln and Prenzlau refugee/transit camps (note 5).

Not just weight, height and build were measured and recorded, but also skull shape, eye colour (men=40% light blue; pic), hair colour, forehead, eye-brow line, nose base, width, tip and prominence, ear length and width, and chin shape. The next year (May and June 1931), some 386 Mennonites from the Prussian Mennonite congregations of Danzig, Rosenort, Orlofferfelde, Ladekopp, Elbing, Markushof-Thiensdorf, and Heubuden were similarly examined with enthusiastic support of church leadership (note 6). Mennonites were considered an unusually “pure” Germanic subgroup—and now they had proof.

The main researcher identified a series of minor physical variances between these two Mennonite populations but considered these to be environmentally conditioned only. The racial-biological differences were only “about as great as those between identical twins” (note 7).

Kauenhowen thought the one improvement the author could have made would be to add a quote from American Mennonite historian C. Henry Smith, who had written: “The term Mennonite might almost as well be applied to a special race as to a body of religious belief” (Note 8).

While the specifics of this very detail rich study may be interesting for those with this same family background—much the way collected DNA results could be—its ideological context and purposes were consistent with those being promoted by National Socialism (note 9).

The research is referenced to or expanded in at least two race-based journals during the Nazi era. The popular journal “Volk und Rasse (Race)” published materials on racial theory and typically lauded German people groups in comparison to others.

“For religious reasons they fundamentally rejected mixed marriages with fellow Germans of other faiths. ... For this reason alone the Mennonites have a special Volk-biological significance, and therefore deserve closer attention as well … Amongst Germans in the Vistula, region Mennonites form a community that is separated spiritually and intellectually, the characteristics of which are also evident in the groups that settled in southern Russia, as Keiter has already proven in his investigations some years ago.” (Note 10)

In an academic journal for racial and social biology, an article on Russian Mennonite family structure and fertility rates precedes another essay with the following opening paragraph:

“Researching questions of genetic-hygiene is one of the most vital tasks which our leader Adolf Hitler gives to scientists and his German people to solve, because the future of a people depends on its quantitative and qualitative reproduction.” (Note 11)

The research on 473 Russian Mennonites couples who had reached the end of their fertility showed that Mennonites of the “parent generation” had on average 8.22 children with 5.13 living past childhood. The infant mortality rate for Mennonites of this generation was 12.1%, and a fully 36% died before reaching adulthood. The high birth rates were due, according to researchers, to the absence of abortion or contraception, and the relatively young age for women to marry. Mennonite men were on average older when they married, compared to the Lutherans and Catholics from Russia in the study group. The Mennonite “grandparent generation” had an average of 9.5 children per married woman, with an average of 2.7 childhood deaths. 5.4 children per couple entered into a marriage. The families of the grandparent generation grew up in peaceful times, whereas their children established families in the context of the war, revolution, famine and post-war chaos in the Soviet Union (note 12).

Those theories of race, Volk, and blood were already of strong quasi academic interest by 1929-30 and were further developed and shaped by Nazi-government policy and support by the mid-1930. Mennonite refugees in 1930 brought this experience and its assumptions of “racial science” to their new settlement lands of Paraguay, Brazil and Canada—which would infect their worldview and debates for the decade to come (note 13). Mennonites in Ukraine who were resettled and naturalized by Nazi Germany 1943-44 were most directly impacted by the politics of this so-called racial science (note 14).

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pics: From Friedrich Keiter (n.5 below); also photographs of the 1929-30 refugee crisis published in the Mennonitische Blätter, the denominational paper of the north German and Prussia Mennonites (Vereinigung), February 1930 to March 1931, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25820#structure.

Note 1: See previous posts, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/christmas-with-refugees-1929.html; AND https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/death-of-refugee-children-as-political.html.

Note 2: See especially the work of the Deutsches Hygiene-Museum in Dresden. It was founded in 1912, and after 1933 used to propagate Nazi race ideology: “Rassismus: Die Erfindung von Menschenrassen,” https://www.dhmd.de/ausstellungen/rueckblick/rassismus.

Note 3: “Nuremberg Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor, September 15, 1935,” Yad Vashem World Holocaust Remembrance Center, https://www.yadvashem.org/docs/nuremberg-law-for-protection-of-german-blood-1935.html.

Note 4: Kurt Kauenhowen, Mitteilungen des Sippenverbandes der Danziger Mennoniten Familien Epp-Kauenhowen-Zimmermann 2, no. 1 (February 1936), 29f., https://www.mharchives.ca/download/1403/.

Note 5: Friedrich Keiter, Rußlanddeutsche Bauern und ihre Stammesgenossen in Deutschland. Untersuchungen zur spezielen und allgemeinen Rassenkunde (Jena: Fischer, 1934), 33, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Pis/RusBauer.pdf. More generally see idem, “Wir Deutsche: Was wir im Vergleich zu den anderen Völkern sind und nicht sind,” Volk und Rasse 16, no. 4 (April 1941), 61-65, https://archive.org/details/nsdap-volk-und-rasse-1941-04/page/n2/mode/1up.

Note 6: Keiter, Rußlanddeutsche Bauern und ihre Stammesgenossen, 2; eye colour chart, p. 36.

Note 7: Keiter, Rußlanddeutsche Bauern und ihre Stammesgenossen¸ 84.

Note 8: C. Henry Smith, The Coming of the Russian Mennonites (Berne, IN: Mennonite Book Concern, 1927), 209, https://archive.org/details/comingofrussianm00unse/page/208/mode/2up; Kauenhowen, Mitteilungen des Sippenverbandes, 30 (my emphasis).

Note 9: For ethical reflection on this era and Mennonite participation, cf. Benjamin W. Goossen, Chosen Nation: Mennonites and Germany in a Global Era (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017), 121-123; 140f.; idem, “Terms of Racial Endearment: Nazi Categorization of Mennonites in Ideology and Practice, 1929–1945,” German Studies Review 44, no. 1 (2021), 27-46; 30, https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/goossen/files/goossen_terms_of_racial_endearment_german_studies_review_2021.pdf; idem, “Hitler’s Mennonite Voters,” Anabaptist Historians, online, https://anabaptisthistorians.org/2021/10/07/hitlers-mennonite-voters/.

Note 10: Erich Keyser, “Die Mennoniten im Weichselland,” Volk und Rasse 17, no. 4 (1942), 71f.; 73, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/65799/edition/60776/content.

Note 11: Heinz Boeters, “Familienaufbau und Fruchtbarkeitsziffern bei rußlanddeutschen Bauern,” 36–42; and Wilhelm Lohoff, “Erbhygenische Untersuchungen an Hilfsschulkindern in Oberhausen und Mühlheim an der Ruhr,” in Archiv für Rassen- und Gesellschafts-Biologie 30 (1936), 36–42; 42, https://books.google.ca/books?id=GcUjAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA36#v=onepage&q&f=false. The study is also referenced in Helmut Hackbarth, Rassentypische Verhaltungsweisen der Mennoniten im Weichsel-Nogat-Delta (Munich: J. F. Lehmanns, 1939), https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1939,%20Hackbarth,%20Rassentypische%20Verhaltungsweisen%20der%20Mennoniten%20im%20Weichsel%20Nogat%20Delta/1939,%20Hackbarth,%20Rassentypische%20Verhaltungsweisen.pdf.

Note 12: Boeters, “Familienaufbau und Fruchtbarkeitsziffern.”

Note 13: See esp. Frank H. Epp, “An Analysis of Germanism and National Socialism in the Immigrant Newspaper of a Canadian Minority Group, the Mennonites, in the 1930s.” PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1965. See previous posts: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2022/09/canadian-mennonites-on-prairie-and.html; AND https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2022/09/in-january-2020-i-received-information.html.

Note 14: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/08/mennonites-highly-attractive-and.html.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in 'Racial Science', 1930," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), Septemer 25, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/09/russian-and-prussian-mennonite.html.

Comments

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons: Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws. It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

The Flight to Moscow 1929

In 1926, my grandfather’s sister Justina Fast (b. 1896) and her husband Peter Görzen moved from Krassikow, Neu Samara (Soviet Union) to village no. 5 Dejewka, Orenburg. “We thought we would live our lives here with our children secure in the hands of God. But the times were becoming turbulent,” Justina recalled. In May 1929 they travelled back to Krassikow for Pentecost to visit with her mother, brothers and their families. But when they returned to their home, she writes, “… a large quota of grain was demanded of us. But we had nothing, and the harvest was not yet in. Then we heard that many were planning to move to Canada, including my three siblings with my mother, and my husband's three sisters too. My husband decided to go to Moscow first to see if it was possible and what was required for emigration. We made the decision to leave when the harvest was complete. At that time so many people were leaving [for Moscow], and early in September we sold everything we had. Only the b...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...

1921: Formation of the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine”

Famine was imminent; unprecedented drought; taxes and requisitions exceeded what was harvested; some villages had no horses; extortion and arrests were widespread; many men were disenfranchised and barred from village affairs (see note 1 ). Lenin responded with the 1921 “New Economic Policy” (NEP), which allowed for a degree of market flexibility within the context of socialism to ward off complete economic collapse. A fixed-tax was imposed, grain quotas were eased, farmers were allowed a small amount of land and could sell excess produce at free-market prices after taxes had been paid. Much was in the air. In secret talks, Soviet Trade Commissar Leonid Krasin told the head of the Eastern Section in the German Foreign Office, Gustav Behrendt, that the USSR was “prepared—just like Catherine the Great of old—to call hundreds of thousands of German colonists into the land and transfer them to large, closed complexes for settlement,” especially in Turkestan and the North Caucasus, be...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

Molotschna Elder Heinrich Dirks and tensions with Mennonite Brethren

Russian Mennonites were not always kind to each other—and nowhere is this seen better than in the tensions between “old” Mennonites and the “separatist” Mennonite Brethren, who had their beginnings in Gnadenfeld, Molotschna in 1860. Heinrich Dirks (1842-1915) was the first Russian Mennonite overseas missionary and later long-time Gnadenfeld, Molotschna ( note 1 ). Everything about Dirks’ life suggests that he would have joined the Brethren in 1860. He too was influenced by the "powerful and gripping” conversionist ministry of Eduard Wüst in his youth. Dirks was a young adult in the Gnadenfeld congregation in South Russia where the Mennonite Brethren /separatist movement began. Shortly thereafter, he was trained in the German pietist Barmen Mission School (1863-67), and famously travelled to Sumatra (Indonesia) where he started a mission outpost and school. The Mennonite Brethren too would later connect the global mission imperative with the impending return of Christ as did Dirk...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog