Skip to main content

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry (Forstei) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta ("Gut [estate] Forroß"; note 1).

The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia (note 2).

The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880:

“On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian officials very much. The lot fell on four young men from Schönsee, including two schoolteachers who were immediately disqualified. The total number of young people is 72. Their term of service began on April 8, 1881, in a forestry near Mariupol.” (Note 3)

Since 1881, this program linked and defined Mennonites from across all geographical, economic, social and theological divides. Every Mennonite young man was eligible to be conscripted for three or four years of forestry work, normally in a camp in proximity to an existing Mennonite settlement.

Twenty-five years later the Mennonite Ministers’ Manual had a clear model to be used by ministers for commissioning new forestry recruits.

“When our Young Men are called up for Forestry Service. The solemn vow which our young men must affirm before entering the forestry service is the one which every elder has in his hands. Before [reading] that, the elder or preacher gives them a short, ernest address concerning civic service and exhorts them to loyalty and obedience to His Majesty our Emperor, to all their superiors and to our fatherland. Then the solemn vow is read to them in Russian, which they must repeat verbatim, and finally it is concluded with prayer and singing of the Russian fatherland anthem.” (Note 4)

In the early years, Mennonite evangelist and poet Bernhard Harder wrote a hymn text for the “conscription and dispatchment of the recruits,” which captures the community’s understanding of this service and witness for God and country: “So go forth now in peace … Serve the Lord faithfully in your office; serve the Monarch, faithfully, the Fatherland” (note 5).

This unique, government sanctioned, faith-based alternative to military service was funded by the community alone: every family and business was peer-assessed according to wealth and taxed by the Mennonite Forestry Service Commission. Commissions overseeing the collection of funds were typically comprised of some of the wealthiest Mennonite industrialists and estate owners (note 6). While the costs were significant, the combined wealth of the colonies was great as well. Mennonite self-organization across fifty settlements was a well-orchestrated, logistical challenge.

For Mennonites, this model worked to keep their young men together in larger self-contained groups for four years under civilian—not military—oversight, and under the spiritual care of their own ministers who served on rotational basis.

This post-educational experience was a requirement by law for Mennonite men—though wealthy families were known to bribe doctors to exempt their sons (note 7)—and like baptism, a prerequisite for marriage in the Mennonite church and property ownership in the Mennonite colonies (note 8).

While the state supplied tools and a very small wage for these conscientious objectors, the larger Mennonite community was responsible for the building of barracks at each of the commandos, for the provision of all food and clothing, as well as for the spiritual care of their young men (note 9).

In the early 1880s related expenses for Mennonites were between 60,000 and 70,000 rubles. By 1914 with some 1,204 young men in service, the annual costs to the community were upwards of 350,000 rubles (=$147,679) (note 10); for comparison, a “beautiful” new school was built in October 1912 at the Molotschna orphanage in Großweide for 12,000 rubles (=$5,000) (note 11). Estate owners paid four kopeks per desiatina; other farmers thirteen kopeks; this changed only with considerable resistance from the wealthy landholders (note 12).

While alternative service was an adventurous, formational experience, its duration was long, its conditions poor, and its work often very difficult; hence, memories were decidedly mixed (note 13).

An 1892 evaluative report by a minister, who had moved to North America and returned to visit, was positive: seventy-nine young men lived in three barracks in a camp near Berdjansk on the Sea of Asov, surrounded only by the gardens and trees they had planted. They worked daily from 6 to 11 am, and 1 to 6 pm. Basic food was supplied by the colonies, cooked and baked by their own, and eaten together in community. A minister was responsible for the order of community life, and the chief forester—normally a Russian—directed the work together with elected leaders. The work was not deemed more difficult than farming; in one year they planted 1,200,000 saplings. The barracks included a library and newspapers, and the young men had a few months leave per year. The North American visitor had a strong sense that in this program the young men were growing in discipline and in the “faith of their forefathers” (note 14).

The value of this concession by the state, its role in shaping young Mennonite men in their faith, and its broader witness was regularly debated. Minutes of the annual meeting of Mennonite elders in 1893 record their “deep sadness” with the moral level in the camps, especially concerning after-hours music making. Elders “urgently advise” the young men to “avoid dance music altogether, which our congregations consider to be contrary to the Confession.” In 1895 elders—now clearly exasperated—requested that all donated instruments come with the proviso: “For music, with the exception of all dance music.” A few years later they recommended that “it would be desirable if the singing of spiritual songs would be fostered more in the forestry camps” (note 15).

In order to help their youth embrace a Christian commitment to non-resistance, in 1906 and 1909 for example, elders and ministers re-committed themselves “to make it their duty to awaken a true confession to inner and outer non-resistance in everyday life through spiritually empowered proclamation of the gospel of peace in the congregations”; and in 1911 they commissioned a shorter Mennonite history text to give the vision context and roots (note 16).

Perhaps the most damning account of the forestry experience was written by Jacob H. Janzen, a teacher, minister and later influential elder in Canada, who experienced the camps as the child of a forestry chaplain, and later as a conscript:

"[T]he workers on the Forstei could not find any purpose in the work they did, therefore had no interest in it, and also no sense of satisfaction … an unjustified Privilegium guaranteed by the Emperor, it had a deteriorating effect upon our youth. … Anyone who knows the Forstei camps will make no attempt to argue that they had an ennobling effect on our people or our Christian faith." (Note 17)

A few returned home from the camps with concrete ideas for congregational reform including: elections rather than the lot for choosing ministers, better educated preachers, reforms in education, more welfare programs and cultural institutions, greater evangelistic outreach, and a structural reorganization of the Mennonite conference of churches (note 18). But perhaps most importantly, after three decades of organization and commitment, Mennonites would be prepared and able to mobilize and finance the much larger, more complex service of their young men as medics during the Great War (note 19). The program reinforced for the whole community their unique identity as non-resistant Christians in the tradition of their forefathers.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: The three Crimea “commando” photos come from Jakob Kröker, "Ein Besuch bei unsern Jünglingen an der Südküste," Christliches Jahrbuch für Belehrung und Unterhaltung, 1902, ed. by A. Kröker and J. Kröker (Spat), 152f., https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/pdf/cjb1902.pdf.

Note 2: For negotiations with the state leading to this Mennonite exception to military service, see previous posts: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2022/09/turning-weapons-into-waffle-irons.html; AND https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/1871-mennonite-tough-luck.html; AND https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/1873-first-russian-mennonites-leave-for.html.

Note 3: Mennonitische Rundschau 1, no. 16 (January 20, 1881), 2, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1881-01-20_1_16/page/n1/. See also Mennonitische Rundschau 2, no. 5 (August 1, 1881), 2, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1881-08-01_2_5/page/n1/mode/2up.

Note 4: Handbuch zum Gebrauch bei gottesdienstlichen Handlungen zunächst für die Aeltesten und Prediger der Mennoniten-Gemeinden in Rußland, edited by the Allgemeiner Konferenz der Mennoniten in Rußland (Berdjansk: Ediger, 1911), 85, https://mla.bethelks.edu/books/264.097%20Al34h/.

Note 5: Bernhard Harder, Geistliche Lieder und Gelegenheitsgedichte von Bernhard Harder, edited by Heinrich Franz, vol. 1 (Hamburg: A-G, 1888), nos. 540, 591, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Pis/Hard1.pdf.

Note 6: E.g., see “Jahresbericht des Bevollmächtigten der Mennonitengemeinden in Rußland in Sachen der Unterhaltung der Forstkommandos im Jahre 1908,” 3-7. From Mennonite Heritage Archives, C.E. Krehbiel Collection, fonds, vol. 4046, file 2, http://mennotree.com/pennerm/index_files/pdf/ForsteiList1908.pdf.

Note 7: Letter to editor, Botschafter 7, no. 1 (January 1 [14], 1912), 5, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Pis/B12-01.pdf.

Note 8: Ministers were very aware that for some baptism was more a custom and rite of passage than a faith commitment, and they tried to address this; cf. (Heinrich Ediger, ed., Beschlüsse der von den geistlichen und anderen Vertretern der Mennonitengemeinden Rußlands abgehaltenen Konferenzen für die Jahren 1879 bis 1913 [Berdjansk: Ediger, 1914], 33 [Minutes 1889]). With respect to marriage, the conference of elders “regrets and finds it a disorder that persons who are not baptized are married” by one of their ministers (ibid., 97 [Minutes 1903]). Mennonite Brethren ministers increasingly married such couples, which caused frustration and disorder from the perspective of the larger church Ediger, Beschlüsse, 132 [Minutes 1909]).

Note 9: For a complete breakdown of program expenses for 1908, cf. “Jahresbericht des Bevollmächtigten der Mennonitengemeinden,” 47–71.

Note 10: George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten in Rußland, vol. 3 (Lage: Logos, 2003), 183f. Expenses not available for 1914; 1913: 347,492 rubles.

Note 11: Jacob P. Janzen, “Diary 1911–1919.” English monthly summaries,” edited and translated by Katharina Wall Janzen. From MHA, Jacob P. Janzen Fonds, 1911–1946, vol. 2341.

Note 12: Gerhard Duerksen, Gnadenfeld Oberschulz from 1887 to 1905, years later detailed to C. Krehbiel his showdown with the estate owners (C. E. Krehbiel’s Journal, February 19, 1922 to March 23, 1923, February 2, 1923. Transcribed by Ruth Unrau. From Mennonite Library and Archives—Bethel College, MS 11, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_11/.

Note 13: Cf. Waldemar Günther, David P. Heidebrecht, and Gerhard J. Peters, eds.,“Onsi Tjedils”: Ersatzdienst der Mennoniten in Rußland unter den Romanows (Yarrow, BC: Self-published, 1966).

Note 14: Letter from H. R. Voth, Mennonitische Rundschau 13, no. 18 (May 4, 1892), 2, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1892-05-04_13_18/page/n1/mode/2up.

Note 15: Ediger, Beschlüsse, 53, 62, 87, for the years 1893, 1895 and 1900 respectively.

Note 16: Ediger, Beschlüsse, 114 (Minutes 1906); 129 (Minutes 1909); 146 (Minutes 1911); 149f. (Minutes 1912). Cf. H. Dirks, “Geschichte des Mennonitenvölkleins in Rußland während des Jahres 1909,” Mennonitisches Jahrbuch 1909, vol. 7 (1910), 15, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/kb/mj1909.pdf.

Note 17: Jacob H. Janzen, Lifting the Veil: Mennonite Life in Russia Before the Revolution, edited with an introduction by Leonard Friesen; translated by Walter Klaassen (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 1998), 77.

Note 18: Cf. Al Reimer, “Sanitätsdienst and Selbstschutz: Russian-Mennonite Nonresistance in World War I and its Aftermath,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 11 (1993), 141, https://jms.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/jms/issue/view/14.

Note 19: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/mennonite-medical-orderlies-in-world.html.

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), September 20, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/09/non-resistant-service-forestry-camps.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The End of Schardau (and other Molotschna villages), 1941

My grandmother was four-years old when her parents moved from Petershagen, Molotschna to Schardau in 1908. This story is larger than that of Schardau, but tells how this village and many others in Molotschna were evacuated by Stalin days before the arrival of German troops in 1941. -ANF The bridge across the Dnieper at Chortitza was destroyed by retreating Soviet troops on August 18, 1941 and the hydroelectric dam completed near Einlage in 1932 was also dynamited by NKVD personnel—killing at least 20,000 locals downstream, and forcing the Germans to cross further south at Nikopol. For the next six-and-a-half weeks, the old Mennonite settlement area of Chortitza was continuously shelled by Soviet troops from Zaporozhje on the east side of the river ( note 1 ). The majority of Russian Germans in Crimea and Ukraine paid dearly for Germany’s Blitzkrieg and plans for racially-based population resettlements. As early as August 3, 1941, the Supreme Command of the Soviet Forces received noti...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...
Post a Comment
Read more

What were Molotschna Mennonites reading in the early 1840s?

Johann Cornies expanded his Agricultural Society School library in Ohrloff to become a lending library “for the instruction and better enlightenment of every adult resident.” The library was overseen by the Agricultural Society; in 1845, patrons across the colony paid 1 ruble annually to access its growing collection of 355 volumes (see note 1 ). The great majority of the volumes were in German, but the library included Russian and some French volumes, with a large selection of handbooks and periodicals on agronomy and agriculture—even a medical handbook ( note 2 ). Philosophical texts included a German translation of George Combe’s The Constitution of Man ( note 3 ) and its controversial theory of phrenology, and the political economist Johann H. G. Justi’s Ergetzungen der vernünftigen Seele —which give example of the high level of reading and reflection amongst some colonists. The library’s teaching and reference resources included a history of science and technology with an accomp...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more