Skip to main content

"Petitioning" to become a teacher in the 1860s

School attendance for Russian Mennonite boys and girls aged (6)7 to 14 was obligatory. The attendance lists, for example, are keys that have unblocked many a genealogical impasse (note 1). But an understanding of the developments in the Mennonite schools as such is also indispensable for the stories of those families, their villages and of Mennonites in their context.

In short, the momentum of school reform did not abate with Johann Cornies’ death in 1848. However we soon enter a period of “archival darkness.” Only a few pieces exist from this era which I have transcribed (more below; see selected pics).

As we know, education in the Mennonite colonies happened from the outset, but was largely dismal or at least very uneven (note 2). This changed when the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Colonists gave oversight of Molotschna’s schools to the powerful Agricultural Society and Cornies, its chairman for life in 1843. Many a school was reconstructed to become roomier and brighter, and was better equipped and maintained. Village teachers too were better resourced, with a more uniform curriculum and schedule. While there was no formal pedagogical training, teaching apprenticeships became common, and participation in monthly seminars for professional development required.

After Cornies’ death, his son-in-law Philipp Wiebe took on the role until 1855. Wiebe aimed to ensure that a teacher was paid “so that he can live properly, feed himself without being anxious, clothe himself properly and keep himself warm,” that is, without the need of taking on a second job (note 3). Teachers’ stature rose in the community: they were to be well-dressed and lead exemplary lives, but hardly any had pedagogical training. “We lacked an appropriate educational institution, a teacher training college. If education is to flourish, the teacher must have had the opportunity to train as a pedagogue. … Our central schools of the forties and fifties could not fully satisfy this need” (note 4).

When Wiebe resigned in 1855 for health reasons, Cornies’ brother David became chairman of the “Molotschna Society for the Advancement of Schools” (under the Agricultural Society chair) followed in 1862 by the wealthy Steinbach estate owner Peter Schmidt.

While Braun can confirm that both were faithful, enlightened promoters of education, “there is little material in archives from the [David] Cornies – Schmidt period,” that is, until the 1869 creation of the “Molotschna Board of Education.”

The Peter J. Braun Archive however includes a few records--in particular correspondence related to the examination of teacher candidates which I have tried to transcribe (note 5).

The “Molotschna Society for the Advancement of Schools” deliberated on regulations concerning the examination of teacher candidates. The conference of church elders and ministers also had a role in the examination. The exam itself, as far as can be ascertained, consisted of biblical history, reading, spelling, and arithmetic. Russian language competency was not yet required. A commission of two church leaders and two educational leaders reported the results of the examination to the Society with the signatures of all members present. Here is a sample:

“As a result of today's examination of the eight school teacher candidates, we hereby report to the Society that three of them, namely Heinrich Gooßen from Marienthal, Johann Esau from Halbstadt, and Peter Dyck from Muntau--who has really worked on his knowledge since his first examination, and should be given preference in our opinion--will try to improve themselves more and more, and should be accepted for which we wish them the Lord's richest blessing and His grace from the bottom of our hearts.

The others are so weak in every respect that there is little hope for them. [my emphasis -ANF]

[Signed] Halbstadt, Jan. 23, 1863. August Lenzmann, Elder; Dirk Warkentin, Elder; Gust. Rempel, District school teacher; B. Harder, Teacher”

The society was intent to set and keep the bar high. Exams were also held the next January:

“As a result of today's examination, we hereby report to the association that the candidates Johann Unrau, Johann Bekker, Peter Löwen, Jakob Nikkel, Martin Hübert and Peter Reimer, who appeared for examination, are still rather weak in their knowledge; the first five however should be able to advance with further training. However we strongly recommend that Martin Hübert work to specifically improve his arithmetic skills; and we recommend that Peter Reimer be directed to continue to work on all subject areas.

[Signed] Halbstadt, January 17, 1864; Church Elder Dirk Warkentin; Church Elder Bernhard Peters; District Teacher Gust. Rempel; Teacher B. Harder”

Teacher candidates applied (Nov./Dec.) for formal examination (January) and placement. Their letters of application were simple; typically they outlined their desire for teaching and private preparation, more than any skill or training.

Jacob Nickel of Muntau wrote the Society that he would like to be examined and take on a school in the next year "because I have felt a drive to be a school teacher within me for several years."

Peter Löwen of Muntau, however wrote in November 1863 that he had prepared for 2 years in the Halbstadt Bezirksschule [Central school] and the desire to become a teacher has grown within him. He asks the Society to be offered a placement in one of the expected openings. Martin Hiebert, Neukirch, feels like he would like to teach, has expanded his knowledge and would like to be considered. 


Peter Reimer of Tiegerweide wrote to Chairman Schmidt in December 1863:

“Driven by desire and love for school matters, I am continue to occupy myself with this collection. Although I am still lacking in higher academics, I intend to attend the local school punctually until vacation time, and will participate in the evening lessons by the local school teacher. I hope with God's help, with diligence and activity, to acquire the necessary school knowledge in all subjects by the time of the examination. For this reason I present the honourable Society with this humble request to give me permission to offer assistance to a school (as teacher).”

Jacob Neufeld of Alexanderkrone who has not yet graduated also asks for a school, but preferably one that is too large school. The folder includes a list of those examined in 1864; Neufeld did not pass.

Peter Braun of Lichtfelde wrote the following to the chair in November 1863:

“Most sincere request! Since I have had a desire and love for schooling for several years, but have held back because of my poor level of knowledge. This winter however I am apprenticing with my brother in Lichtfelde, and I intend to perfect this, and I think that by Spring of 1864 I will have come so far as to be able to serve a small or medium-sized village school with God's help. I turn to the honourable Society with the request that, after prior examination, you will help me so that I can take on a school position." (Marginal note: "Zurückgeblieben" [did not proceed]).

From Münsterberg Jacob Heidebrecht wrote the Society that his family situation had changed and he believes that he is now able to take on the role of a teacher. Johann Becker, Franzthal, seeks the same, and promises that he will study and learn more.

The folder also includes a request from the new Mennonite settlements in Crimea, preferably someone connected to Gnadenfeld. Chairman Peter Schmidt recommended Johann Unrau of Prangenau, who however declined:

"Regarding the letter I received from the Society concerning the position of school teacher in Crimea, I would like to inform you that I have decided not to take it on, because I feel in myself that I do not have enough knowledge to take on the position of school teacher completely, and that I would not yet be able to make much progress in Crimea because, as I said, there are only few or almost no learned school teachers from whom I could receive instruction.

So I also request from the Society to assist me all the more in order to be able to take over a school position somewhere in the Molotschna Colony, for which I will diligently strive with God's help to acquire the knowledge still required for this purpose. This is the sincere wish of your most devoted servant, Johann Unrau, Prangeneau, July 5 [1863]."

Gerhard Goossen wrote a short letter to Schmidt as well indicating that he was no longer wanted as teacher in Fischau and asks the Society chair for another placement (Nov. 1863).

The correspondence preserved from this era on educational matters suggests that the role of teacher in the community was evolving into a desired, respectable community role requiring application and some competency. The role was regulated and also compensated fairly (more or less)—whereas in the pre-Cornies era this was not the case in most villages.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Cf. the Glenn H. Penner’s “Guide to the available Molotschna Settlement School Registers,” https://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/Molotschna_School_Lists_Guide.pdf.

Note 2: See previous posts, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/mennonite-literacy-in-polish-prussia.html.

Note 3: Peter J. Braun, Der Molotschnaer Mennoniten-Schulrat, 1869–1919. Zum Gedenktag seines 50jährigen Bestehens, edited by Wladimir Süss (Göttingen: Göttinger Arbeitskreis, 2001 [1920 manuscript]), 28. See also idem, “The Educational System of the Mennonite Colonies in South Russia,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 3, no. 3 (July 1929), 169–182; idem, “Education among the Mennonites in Russia,” GAMEO, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Education_Among_the_Mennonites_in_Russia. See also Leonhard Froese, “Das pädagogische Kultursystem der mennonitischen Siedlungsgruppe in Russland,” PhD dissertation (University of Göttingen, 1949). See also idem, “Schulwesen der Mennoniten in Rußland,” Mennonitisches Lexikon, Bd. 4, ed. Gerhard Hein et al. (Baden: Schneider, 1967), 109-114; 111.

Note 4: Abraham Görz, Die Schulen in den Mennoniten-Kolonien an der Molotschna im südlichen Russland (Berdjansk: Molotschner Mennoniten-Kirchenkonvent 1882), 5f., https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/?file=Pis/Goerz.pdf.

Note 5: File 1961, “Society for Advancement of Schools: Reports and Correspondence, 1863-64,” Peter J. Braun Russian Mennonite Archive, 1803-1920. Robarts Library, University of Toronto. All of the correspondence noted in this post are transcribed and translated from this file the author --ANF.

Print Friendly and PDF
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Immigration to Canada, 1923: Background

In April 1921 Mennonites in the Caucasus and Don Region officially petitioned Moscow for permissions to emigrate—which Lenin had “flatly refused.” Their rationale was more than economic. “The disruption of economic conditions leads to impoverishment, which again goes hand in hand with the degradation of morals and has an alarming impact on our youth, who are also constantly exposed to the pressure of brutal and ruthless agitation on the part of those in power. … This decay of our spiritual and economic goods will only become greater and more ruinous.” ( Note 1 ) Later that year and some months before the large-scale feeding operations could begin in the Soviet Union, American Mennonite Relief (AMR) commissioner A.J. Miller petitioned the Soviet Embassy in London for exit permissions for 20,000 Mennonites ( note 1b) . He was unsuccessful. Nonetheless in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, key Mennonite leaders took a decision to work toward the re...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...
Post a Comment
Read more