Skip to main content

1843: London Bible Society, revival and School reform

In 1843 the Russian Mennonite colonies received a visitation from the London Bible Society. It was the same year that Charles Dickens published "A Christmas Carol" about the miser Ebenezer Scrooge and his conversion after the visitation of three Christmas ghosts! Dickens was not happy that the Church’s overseas mission budget was so large, while in his view they neglected the poor on their own doorsteps in London.

Ebenezer was in fact a common British name of the era. A few years earlier the Molotschna was visited by a delegation from the British and Foreign Bible Society. The British agent, Reverend Ebeneezer Henderson, convinced Molotschna elders and Johann Cornies to establish their own Bible Society. "As they live on habits of friendship and intimacy with their Tatar neighbours, and one of their principal men [Cornies] speaks the Tatar with fluency, we furnished him with a good supply of New Testaments, and other portions of Scripture, in that language, that they might commence their operations without delay” (note 1).

After the 1843 visit of the London Bible Society to Russia, a report was published in the Boston-based Baptist paper Christian Watchman about the Mennonites (pic). Neither the editor nor the delegate were well-informed or well-disposed towards Mennonites. The editor prefaced the report with the following: “The state of the people [Russian Mennonites] seems lamentable enough, but we know they are not quite so bad as they are here described [in the report]. There is a considerable number of Mennonites also in Canada [Waterloo; Swiss], who are, we fear, in a state bordering on heathen darkness” (note 2).

The delegate’s impressions of the Chortitza Colony were downright dismal.

“I was very sorry to observe the total want of religious instruction in the schools; and as far as I could learn, it is almost totally neglected in the family circle. When the children come to a certain age, it is considered as a mere matter of course, that they must be immersed, and be added to the church; till that time they are seldom to be found in the House of Prayer. What a cold-hearted Christianity prevails throughout these colonies, though the people are otherwise kind, even to a proverb, in this part of the country.”

The same visitor found that the Molotschna was "in no better a state, as it regards religion." However he was very much impressed with the spiritual leadership of a few church leaders and Cornies.

“In the Moloskna, however, there are a few zealous for the glory of God; who maintain spiritual worship, both in public and private; who labor for the spiritual welfare of their children, both in their schools and in the family circle. Religion prospers under the care of these devoted servants of the Lord. They have one very able man among them, by whose labors, partly, this pleasing state of things has been brought about. They have their missionary meetings regularly; at which two or more of their preachers address the meeting and read extracts from missionary intelligence, which they endeavour regularly to receive. I was present at one of their missionary meetings; it was opened by prayer and praise, and was concluded in a like manner. They have also a Temperance Society among them, which is doing good. Among these good friends, I found the preachers most willing to forward the work of Scripture distribution; and I was happy to be able to give them a supply, of which they were greatly in want. May the Lord bless the labors of these good men, for the benefit of all the surrounding colonies.”

Were the differences so stark? 1843 also marks the arrival of Eduard Wüst in the region--a university-trained Württemberg Pietist minister installed by the separatist Evangelical Brethren Church in New Russia. Wüst was invited regularly to the Molotschna as guest speaker. “Revivals broke out” in multiple Molotschna villages, including Rudnerweide and Gnadenfeld on the eastern edge of the colony (note 3). 

In 1843 the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Settlers in New Russia also placed all Molotschna village schools under the jurisdiction of the Agricultural Society and Johann Cornies, its appointed chairman-for-life. This impacted the ethos and direction of the colony. Despite some opposition, Cornies was given full responsibility and control of implementing school reforms. In his trademark style, Cornies briskly released less competent and less diligent teachers, introduced village level school boards to promote improved supervision, management, administration and leadership in local schools; defined parental obligations and imposed fines for truancy; standardized the curriculum; organized conferences as requested by some progressive teachers; and mandated standard large-sized school buildings with appropriate equipment.

Cornies worked closely with Heinrich Heese, head of the Agricultural Society School, to formalize school constitution or “rule” in which the school together with the home have the key formational responsibilities towards the realms of both “church and state.” Viewed from the one side, the school is “situated between living room and church (Kirche), as a supporting institution (Hilfs-Anstalt) of training in the home for the preliminary introduction into the community (Gemeine) of the Lord.” Viewed from the other side, the school is “situated between living room and state as a supporting institution of training in the home for the preliminary introduction into civil society” (note 4). School boards were to be composed of “secular members as well as well as spiritual (geistliche) members, since schools are institutions of the church and the state” (note 5).

When the elders and ministers were informed that they were to have oversight of religion classes alone, as was the case in Prussia, “one of the elders, apparently completely distraught, shouted out: ‘everything is being taken from out of our hands’” (note 6). Yet in the view of one senior, “until now the elders could have had—should have had—control over the schools, but never actually had it in hand. Not only did they not concern themselves about it, but they actively worked against and were hostile toward every private initiative in support of schools” (note 7).

Schools were now explicitly recast as “institutes of spiritual salvation and healing for all peoples,” and the teacher’s “costly and sacred duty [was] to model a spiritual walk not only before his schoolchildren, but also before the whole community,” and “to keep his profession holy” (note 8).

What was the impact of these three “visitations” of 1843, i.e., London Bible Society, Eduard Wüst and the Guardianship Committee with its new mandate? Was there a Dickens-like "conversion“ in the Mennonite soul taking place? I will not make that judgement, nor argue that 1843 is a particularly important anniversary year for Russian Mennonites. These visitations however offer a colourful picture of the social, cultural and religious evolution of Russian Mennonite life some forty years after the now aging generation of settlers first arrived on the east bank of the Molotschna River.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast


---Notes---

Note 1: Ebeneezer Henderson, Biblical Researches and Travels in Russia (James Nisbet, 1826), 386, https://books.google.ca/books?id=8yFaAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA386#v=onepage&q&f=false. See previous post (forthcoming).

Note 2/pic: “Mennonites in Russia,” Christian Watchman 24, no. 27 (July 7, 1843), 1 (Dickens photo: Wikipedia)

Note 3: Abraham Kröker, Pfarrer Eduard Wüst. Der große Erweckungsprediger in den deutschen Kolonien Südrußlands (Spat, Crimea: Self-published, ca. 1903), 77; 80, https://chortitza.org/Pis/Kroeker.pdf. See also previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/eduard-wust-second-menno.html.

Note 4: Johann Cornies, “Schulgesetz: von der Einrichtung des Schulwesens, oder von der Schulordnung, oder Schulverfassung,” 1842? [1843 -ANF], 3.1 (emphasis in original), in Peter J. Braun Russian Mennonite Archive, 1803-1920, reel 32, file 742, Robarts Library, University of Toronto.

Note 5: “Schulgesetz,” par. 2.3.

Note 6: In D. H. Epp, Johann Cornies: Züge aus seinem Leben und Wirken [1909] (Rosthern, SK: Echo, 1946), 57, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/?file=1dok15.pdf.

Note 7: Franz Isaac, Die Molotschnaer Mennoniten. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte derselben (Halbstadt, Taurien: H. J. Braun, 1908), 278, https://archive.org/details/die-molotschnaer-mennoniten-editablea; ET: https://www.mharchives.ca/download/3573/.

Note 8: “Schulgesetz,” par. 3.1,3.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Mennonite Medical Orderlies in World War I

Russia declared war on Germany on July 20, 1914. Mennonite ministers and civic leaders met on July 22, and called for the extension of their community’s alternative service agreement beyond forestry service: to form complete medical units to gather the wounded from the front and to transport them by hospital trains to interior hospitals; to establish special hospital facilities for the wounded in the colonies; to fundraise large sums for the Red Cross; and to grant financial aid to families of soldiers ( note 1 ). Mennonites knew that they would have to prove their patriotism in positive and tangible ways in order to retain property rights and privileges. Abraham Kröker, editor of the Friedensstimme , wrote just before the start of the war: “Do we not owe it our government and Russian neighbours to show that if a war … broke out, we would be ready to serve the interests of the Fatherland [Russia], and to help the needy?” D. H. Epp, editor of Der Botschafter , wrote: “We need to show ...

Flooding and Mennonites: A Common Thread

In November 2021 many Mennonites in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia were impacted by disastrous flooding. The mayor of Abbotsford—the worst-hit city—as well as the local Member of Parliament were Mennonites. Many Mennonites across Canada had family members who are directly impacted.  Flood stories have been an important thread in the Prussian-Russian Mennonite story. How have Mennonites responded? Mutual aid stands out. For Menno Simons, it was “the only sign whereby a true Christian may be known” ( note 1 ).  In 1562, “Dutch people of the Mennonite religion” were specifically invited by the Polish banking house Loysen to settle on the “Tiegenhoff part of the Vistula Delta” to rebuild dikes partially destroyed by huge floods (1540 and 1543) and wars, and to drain low-lying lagoons and swamps over large blocks of land ( note 2 ). The Tiege River—a branch of the Vistula—was at or below sea level.  Dams and ditches along the Nogat and Vistula rivers had been construct...

“First Arrival of German Troops in Halbstadt” (Volksfreund, April 20, 1918)

“ April 19, 1918 will always remain significant in the history of the Molotschna German Colony. That which until recently could hardly be imagined has occurred: the German military has arrived to free us from the despotism, rape and pillaging of barbarous people and to reestablish the order and security of life and property--something desperately necessary for our land. For this we give thanks above all to the One in whose hands the peoples and nations and also individuals rest. ...” ( Note 1 ) Mennonites greeted their “guests and liberators” with festivities that included baked goods (Zwieback), meats and even the German anthem “ Deutschland, Deutschland über alles "—all before the watchful eyes of their Russian /Ukrainian neighbours. The troops arrived by train; and to the shock of most present, three bound prisoners—all well-known bandits and terrorists—“were brought out of one of the railway cars without any prior notice, lined up and shot right in front of us” as an exampl...

Mennonite Christmases in the Diary of Jacob P. Janzen, 1911-1914

The following accounts of Mennonite Christmases before the Revolution are from the unpublished diary of Jacob P. Janzen ( note 1 ). His entries are “real,” in the sense that they include all the complexities and messiness of life, with interesting detail. These accounts are from a single man in his thirties (b. 1880) in Rudnerweide, Molotschna. His entries show him as a sensitive, humble, and curious man, who was certainly well-informed about life in the community.          --Arnold Neufeldt-Fast -- Christmas 1911 (Janzen was working at "Bethania Mental Hospital" on the Dnjeper River near Einlage, note 2 ) “Some of the staff went to [director Peter] Schellenbergs to practice Christmas songs. I did not go. Aganetha Woelk [patient] had broken several window panes; I had to replace them and it got quite late. But while working in the female patients’ quarters I had a chance to see how they made beautiful, but inexpensive ornaments for the Christmas tree. Nur...

Invitation to the Russian Consulate, Danzig, January 19, 1788

B elow is one of the most important original Mennonite artifacts I have seen. It concerns January 19. The two land scouts Jacob Höppner and Johann Bartsch had returned to Danzig from Russia on November 10, 1787 with the Russian Immigration Agent, Georg von Trappe. Soon thereafter, Trappe had copies of the royal decree and agreement (Gnadenbrief) printed for distribution in the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig and other locations, dated December 29, 1787 ( see pic ; note 1 ). After the flyer was handed out to congregants in Danzig after worship on January 13, 1788, city councilors made the most bitter accusations against church elders for allowing Trappe and the Russian Consulate to do this; something similar had happened before ( note 2 ). In the flyer Trappe boasted that land scouts Höppner and Bartsch met not only with Gregory Potemkin, Catherine the Great’s vice-regent and administrator of New Russia, but also with “the Most Gracious Russian Monarch” herse...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

From USSR to Cherrywood Station: Mennonites winter in Markham-Stouffville, 1924

On September 26, 1924, 126 Russian Mennonite passengers disembarked the S. S. Melita at Quebec City ( note 1 ). They were among some 20,000 Mennonites who could immigrate to Canada from the Soviet Union in the 1920s. A number of these families received train cards to Cherrywood (Pickering) and Locust Hill (Markham) stations, where they were received by Markham area Mennonites. The Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization (CMBC) registration forms record each family's travel dates as well as their "first place of arrival" in Canada. The attached artifacts—a few pages from the financial records booklet kept by Markham-Stouffville treasurer J. L. Grove, plus some correspondence—profile concretely the level of support of this community north-east of Toronto for co-religionists fleeing the Soviet Union. Mennonites in Ontario had been well informed of the relief needs in Russia since 1921 and plans for mass immigration ( note 2 ). In April 1924 the local Stouffville Tribune ...

Mennonites lay down their arms, Good Friday 1919. Pray for forgiveness

In the Mennonite tradition, there is no communion without first making peace with your brother or sister. The diary of Jacob P. Janzen of Rudnerweide, Molotschna—a single adult, brother to a lay minister—gives regular examples: “Easter Sunday, April 10, 1911: We were also admonished to take part in communion; not many had attended [it] on Good Friday. With some it is because of small quarrels within the family or with neighbours, but others have felt deep hate for a long time and have stayed away for more than 20 years!” ( Note 1 ) Frequently Janzen also wrote down brief evaluations of the worship service, like on Good Friday 1911: “Today we had communion in the morning and also church services in the afternoon. Rev. [S.] preached the sermon. He had written everything down and looked now and then at his papers, but in between he often got stuck and then he would keep coughing until he found his place in his papers. It was very disturbing and I became quite annoyed.” These Good ...