1843: London Bible Society, revival and School reform

In 1843 the Russian Mennonite colonies received a visitation from the London Bible Society. It was the same year that Charles Dickens published "A Christmas Carol" about the miser Ebenezer Scrooge and his conversion after the visitation of three Christmas ghosts! Dickens was not happy that the Church’s overseas mission budget was so large, while in his view they neglected the poor on their own doorsteps in London.

Ebenezer was in fact a common British name of the era. A few years earlier the Molotschna was visited by a delegation from the British and Foreign Bible Society. The British agent, Reverend Ebeneezer Henderson, convinced Molotschna elders and Johann Cornies to establish their own Bible Society. "As they live on habits of friendship and intimacy with their Tatar neighbours, and one of their principal men [Cornies] speaks the Tatar with fluency, we furnished him with a good supply of New Testaments, and other portions of Scripture, in that language, that they might commence their operations without delay” (note 1).

After the 1843 visit of the London Bible Society to Russia, a report was published in the Boston-based Baptist paper Christian Watchman about the Mennonites (pic). Neither the editor nor the delegate were well-informed or well-disposed towards Mennonites. The editor prefaced the report with the following: “The state of the people [Russian Mennonites] seems lamentable enough, but we know they are not quite so bad as they are here described [in the report]. There is a considerable number of Mennonites also in Canada [Waterloo; Swiss], who are, we fear, in a state bordering on heathen darkness” (note 2).

The delegate’s impressions of the Chortitza Colony were downright dismal.

“I was very sorry to observe the total want of religious instruction in the schools; and as far as I could learn, it is almost totally neglected in the family circle. When the children come to a certain age, it is considered as a mere matter of course, that they must be immersed, and be added to the church; till that time they are seldom to be found in the House of Prayer. What a cold-hearted Christianity prevails throughout these colonies, though the people are otherwise kind, even to a proverb, in this part of the country.”

The same visitor found that the Molotschna was "in no better a state, as it regards religion." However he was very much impressed with the spiritual leadership of a few church leaders and Cornies.

“In the Moloskna, however, there are a few zealous for the glory of God; who maintain spiritual worship, both in public and private; who labor for the spiritual welfare of their children, both in their schools and in the family circle. Religion prospers under the care of these devoted servants of the Lord. They have one very able man among them, by whose labors, partly, this pleasing state of things has been brought about. They have their missionary meetings regularly; at which two or more of their preachers address the meeting and read extracts from missionary intelligence, which they endeavour regularly to receive. I was present at one of their missionary meetings; it was opened by prayer and praise, and was concluded in a like manner. They have also a Temperance Society among them, which is doing good. Among these good friends, I found the preachers most willing to forward the work of Scripture distribution; and I was happy to be able to give them a supply, of which they were greatly in want. May the Lord bless the labors of these good men, for the benefit of all the surrounding colonies.”

Were the differences so stark? 1843 also marks the arrival of Eduard Wüst in the region--a university-trained Württemberg Pietist minister installed by the separatist Evangelical Brethren Church in New Russia. Wüst was invited regularly to the Molotschna as guest speaker. “Revivals broke out” in multiple Molotschna villages, including Rudnerweide and Gnadenfeld on the eastern edge of the colony (note 3).

In 1843 the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Settlers in New Russia also placed all Molotschna village schools under the jurisdiction of the Agricultural Society and Johann Cornies, its appointed chairman-for-life. This impacted the ethos and direction of the colony. Despite some opposition, Cornies was given full responsibility and control of implementing school reforms. In his trademark style, Cornies briskly released less competent and less diligent teachers, introduced village level school boards to promote improved supervision, management, administration and leadership in local schools; defined parental obligations and imposed fines for truancy; standardized the curriculum; organized conferences as requested by some progressive teachers; and mandated standard large-sized school buildings with appropriate equipment.

Cornies worked closely with Heinrich Heese, head of the Agricultural Society School, to formalize school constitution or “rule” in which the school together with the home have the key formational responsibilities towards the realms of both “church and state.” Viewed from the one side, the school is “situated between living room and church (Kirche), as a supporting institution (Hilfs-Anstalt) of training in the home for the preliminary introduction into the community (Gemeine) of the Lord.” Viewed from the other side, the school is “situated between living room and state as a supporting institution of training in the home for the preliminary introduction into civil society” (note 4). School boards were to be composed of “secular members as well as well as spiritual (geistliche) members, since schools are institutions of the church and the state” (note 5).

When the elders and ministers were informed that they were to have oversight of religion classes alone, as was the case in Prussia, “one of the elders, apparently completely distraught, shouted out: ‘everything is being taken from out of our hands’” (note 6). Yet in the view of one senior, “until now the elders could have had—should have had—control over the schools, but never actually had it in hand. Not only did they not concern themselves about it, but they actively worked against and were hostile toward every private initiative in support of schools” (note 7).

Schools were now explicitly recast as “institutes of spiritual salvation and healing for all peoples,” and the teacher’s “costly and sacred duty [was] to model a spiritual walk not only before his schoolchildren, but also before the whole community,” and “to keep his profession holy” (note 8).

What was the impact of these three “visitations” of 1843, i.e., London Bible Society, Eduard Wüst and the Guardianship Committee with its new mandate? Was there a Dickens-like "conversion“ in the Mennonite soul taking place? I will not make that judgement, nor argue that 1843 is a particularly important anniversary year for Russian Mennonites. These visitations however offer a colourful picture of the social, cultural and religious evolution of Russian Mennonite life some forty years after the now aging generation of settlers first arrived on the east bank of the Molotschna River.

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Ebeneezer Henderson, Biblical Researches and Travels in Russia (James Nisbet, 1826), 386, https://books.google.ca/books?id=8yFaAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA386#v=onepage&q&f=false. See previous post (forthcoming).

Note 2/pic: “Mennonites in Russia,” Christian Watchman 24, no. 27 (July 7, 1843), 1 (Dickens photo: Wikipedia)

Note 3: Abraham Kröker, Pfarrer Eduard Wüst. Der große Erweckungsprediger in den deutschen Kolonien Südrußlands (Spat, Crimea: Self-published, ca. 1903), 77; 80, https://chortitza.org/Pis/Kroeker.pdf. See also previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/eduard-wust-second-menno.html.

Note 4: Johann Cornies, “Schulgesetz: von der Einrichtung des Schulwesens, oder von der Schulordnung, oder Schulverfassung,” 1842? [1843 -ANF], 3.1 (emphasis in original), in Peter J. Braun Russian Mennonite Archive, 1803-1920, reel 32, file 742, Robarts Library, University of Toronto.

Note 5: “Schulgesetz,” par. 2.3.

Note 6: In D. H. Epp, Johann Cornies: Züge aus seinem Leben und Wirken [1909] (Rosthern, SK: Echo, 1946), 57, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/?file=1dok15.pdf.

Note 7: Franz Isaac, Die Molotschnaer Mennoniten. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte derselben (Halbstadt, Taurien: H. J. Braun, 1908), 278, https://archive.org/details/die-molotschnaer-mennoniten-editablea; ET: https://www.mharchives.ca/download/3573/.

Note 8: “Schulgesetz,” par. 3.1,3.

Comments

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons: Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog