Skip to main content

German Military in Southern Ukraine, 1918: Photos

Photographs of German troops in southern Ukraine, 1918, have recently come to light. These offer a new window on Mennonite life during the short period of "friendly" German occupation. A number of these photographs are attached to this post and complement previous posts on this period (note 1).

On February 17, 1918, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel “Bolshevik invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability (note 2).

Anticipating the imminent arrival of German troops early in 1918, some Mennonites had already taken up arms in self-defense against the anarchist leader Nestor Makhnov; the “thunder” of the cannons in the vicinity gave strong indication that the German army was near (note 3).

Some 450,000 occupying German and Austrian troops changed the equation for the Bolsheviks and anarchists in Ukraine. Some German Mennonites were among those soldiers, including the brother-in-law to teacher and community leader Benjamin H. Unruh.

In his diary, Jacob P. Janzen in Rudnerweide wrote:

May 21, 1918: “A high ranking general was to be here for “klein” [small] breakfast, but only came for lunch. He is a Prussian, currently from Melitopol, and is the Chairman and Adjutant. … On our street an honour display had been set up, decorated with flowers and grass. After breakfasting he shook hands with all the Rudnerweide people, asking them whether they were local people and if their name was of German origin. He also spoke to the children and when he left the children threw flowers into his car. He waved to all and on the street … gentlemen took off their hats and waved with them.” (Note 4)

Also in May a decree by the occupation forces made courses in the “art of war” obligatory for Mennonite school children up to age twelve, as well as for older youth to age eighteen. Men eighteen to forty were to be conscripted for eight weeks of training for a minimum of twelve hours per week; women could join as well, but were not obligated (note 5).

But this step was not as obvious as the Germans had expected. Because the use of arms for organized self-defence was something novel in the tradition, the General Mennonite Conference of Churches organized four days of meetings in Lichtenau on “the confession of non-resistance among Mennonites” and “political questions” (note 6). The church was required to respond by July 4 on the esta­­­­blishment of self-defence militia units.

Informed debate was however difficult; the German occupying force heavily censored the Mennonite press from publishing articles supporting non-resistance (note 7). The Deutsche Zeitung für Ost-Taurien, published by the German army administration at Melitopol, printed a column that challenged the “inner justification” of biblical pacifism in response to the Mennonite congress in Lichtenau, and framed the division in the community generationally: “While the younger, progressively-minded portion of congregations declared their willingness to accept universal conscription, the older ones were against it.” The columnist—likely an army chaplain—closed his biblical argument with a reminder: “When the Bolshevist reign was broken, who was here in Melitopol first to request [German] military protection and weapons for self-defence?—The Mennonites!” (note 8). German army leadership around Melitopol and estate owners were dependent upon each other (note 9).

Janzen’s diary gives us a snapshot of how this was experienced on the ground.

"August 1918: Two of the Germans began a military drill in our forest with our volunteers for the Selbstschutz, 20 young men from our village and 10 from Großweide. Four days later we received a notice that all men from 18 to 45 years old were to appear at a general meeting with the village mayor. The German was there too and read an order out of a little notebook, telling us to join the Selbstschutz, all men age 18 to 25. If there were not enough of these he would conscript older men too. The order was signed only by initials of some unknown person. And he expected us to accept! Did he really think us that stupid? Brother David [a minister] and I and many others spoke strongly against it." (Note 10)

As late as mid-September, the official German press written for both soldiers and settlers found it necessary to explain the rationale for a Selbstschutz to reluctant communities, offer examples of success, and entice “eager, cheerful” young men for a training with purpose, that promised not to be “uninteresting.”

“The occupation of every village and of every larger estate [with troops] in all of Taurien is obviously impossible. In order to give residents the possibility to defend their property and possessions from those uncertain and indolent elements, the German military authority has commanded the creation of a Selbstschutz in every village community. They are not to replace the military force, but to support them where a late arrival of military forces can be expected.” (Note 11)

In 1918 in the Region of Taurien (including Crimea), there were 56,000 German Lutherans, 27,000 German Catholics, 50,000 Mennonites and a smaller community of German Baptists (note 12). The new sense of German ethnic brotherhood and incautious enthusiasm for the Reich would come back to haunt the German settlements later that year—and for decades to come.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: I thank Dr. James Urry for sharing a link to a portfolio containing 263 photographs documenting the advance of the German Flight Squadron 27 in the Ukraine during Spring and Summer of 1918, from Southern Methodist University, Texas, https://digitalcollections.smu.edu/digital/collection/eaa/id/668. See previous posts: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/april-19-1918-mennonites-in-ukraine.html and https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/becoming-german-ludendorff-festivals-in.html. 

Note 2: Cf. Oberste Heeresleitung, “Denkschrift: Über die Wahrung der Interessen des Reiches in den neuen Ost-Staaten in strategischer, wirtschaftlicher und verkehrspolitischer Hinsicht durch Konzessionsierung einer Osteuropäischen Verkehr-Gesellschaft (June 1918),” Reichskanzlei Kriegsakten 4:2, vol. 3 (März–Juli 1918), 185–188 (BArchR 43/2406). From Bundesarchiv Berlin-Lichterfelde, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/; also Vzfw. (Sergeant) Rießner, “Das Ziel des deutschen Einmarsches in die Ukraine,” Deutsche Zeitung für Ost-Taurien [DZOT] 1, no. 40 (July 25, 1918), 2f., https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/suche?queryString=PPN777397188. See esp. Wolfram Dornik, et al., The Emergence of Ukraine: Self-Determination, Occupation, and War in Ukraine, 1917–1922, translated by Gus Fagan (Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 2015).

Note 3: “H.U.” [Halbstadt Elder H. Unruh] wrote May 18, just shortly after German occupation, that “after having taken up arms for our own self-defence, we will likely be required to do the same for the protection of the Fatherland” (Volksfreund II/XI, no. 20 /38 [May 18, 1918], 2), https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk25.pdf. Another writer also refers to the use of weapons by Mennonites prior to German occupation “to protect our earthly goods” (Volksfreund II, no. 15 [April 23, 1918], 1; link broken). Cf. Gerhard Schroeder, Miracles of Grace and Judgement: A Family Strives for Survival During the Russian Revolution (Lodi, CA: Self-published, 1974), 28f.

Note 4: Jacob P. Janzen, “Diary 1911–1919. English monthly summaries," edited and translated by Katharina Wall Janzen. From Mennonite Heritage Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Jacob P. Janzen fonds, 1911–1946, vol. 2341.

Note 5: Notice in Volksfreund II, no. 20 (May 18, 1918), 6, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk25.pdf. The arming and military organization of colonists into local Selbstschutz units was directed by Berlin, as was the support for a strong crop for export (cf. Jochen Oltmer, Migration und Politik in der Weimarer Republik [Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005], 177f.).

Note 6: Friedensstimme 16, no. 36 (July 23, 1918), 1, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk47.pdf. Old “mission-friends” felt that reporting on the real “work of the kingdom of God,” namely the mission work in Sumatra and Java, was squeezed out.

Note 7: For example, Jakob Wiebe’s paper in support of non-resistance presented at the Lichtenau General Conference of the Mennonite Congregations in Russia, June 30 to July 2, 1918, was only published a year later (cf. “Zur Wehrlosigkeit der Mennoniten,” Friedensstimme 17, no. 27 [August 10, 1919]: 2f., https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk51.pdf). The editor, who was completely exasperated by his German army censor, noted apologetically that the article would have been impossible to publish under occupation, and was held back.

Note 8: “Die Mennoniten und die allgemeine Wehrpflicht,” DZOT 1, no. 27 (July 10, 1918), 2, https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/suche?queryString=PPN777397188.

Note 9: Cf. “Biography of Jacob Cornelius Toews, 1882–1968,” translated by Frieda Toews Baergen (Essex-Kent Mennonite Historical Association Leamington), 27f., https://www.ekmha.ca/collections/items/show/42.

Note 10: J. Janzen, “Diary 1916–1919.”

Note 11: “Selbstschutz,” DZOT no. 87 (September 18, 1918): 2, https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/suche?queryString=PPN777397188.

Note 12: Cf. A. Bühler, “Das Deutschtum in Taurien,” Deutschtum im Ausland, no. 36 (1918), 358-362, https://books.google.ca/books?id=4wo2IhXfUskC.

----

The following photographs are from a portfolio containing 263 photographs documenting the advance of the German Flight Squadron 27 in the Ukraine during Spring and Summer of 1918, from the Digital Collections of Southern Methodist University (SMU), Texas, https://digitalcollections.smu.edu/digital/collection/eaa/id/668. 





Print Friendly and PDF
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
1 comment
Read more

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russo-Japanese War and the Mennonite Response, 1904-05

In February 1904, Russia declared war on Japan and Mennonite congregations sent the Tsar messages of loyalty, love and prayers. The large Lichtenau-Petershagen-Schönsee congregation in the Mennonite Molotschna Colony in today’s Ukraine led by 80-year-old Elder (Bishop) Jakob Töws expressed its “deep loyalty and love for the throne and the Fatherland” ( note 1 ). Similarly, the Mennonite Chortitza congregation declared that Mennonites bow “humbly before the Imperial Majesty with most faithful love and devotion,” and “together with all faithful subjects send their most passionate prayers and supplications to the Most High, that He may extend his mighty hand over the beloved Tsar and the Russian people, and that peace may soon be returned” ( note 2 ). The Einlage Mennonite Brethren congregation offered a similar statement, “inspired by feelings of boundless dedication to the Sovereign Fatherland,” with “passionate prayers” for the Tsar and Fatherland, based on 1 Timothy 2:1–4 ( note 3 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eduard Wüst: A “Second Menno”?

Arguably the most significant outside religious influence on Mennonite s in the 19th century was the revivalist preaching of Eduard Wüst, a university-trained Württemberg Pietist minister installed by the separatist Evangelical Brethren Church in New Russia in 1843 ( note 1 ). With the end-time prophesies of a previous generation of Pietists (and many Mennonites) coming to naught, Wüst introduced Germans in this area of New Russia to the “New Pietism” and its more individualistic, emotional conversion experience and sermons on the free grace of God centred on the cross of Christ ( note 2 ). Wüst’s 1851 Christmas sermon series give a good picture of what was changing ( note 3 ). His core agenda was to dispel gloom (which maybe could describe more traditional Mennonites) and induce Christian joy. This is the root impulse of the Mennonite Brethren beginnings years later in 1860. “Satan is not entitled to present his own as the most joyful.” His people “sing, jump, leap ( hüpfen ) ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Becoming German: Ludendorff Festivals in Molotschna, 1918

During the friendly German military occupation of Ukraine at the end of WWI, patriotic “Ludendorff Festivals” were encouraged by German forces to raise funds to support injured German soldiers. A first such festival in the Molotschna was held on June 25, 1918 in Ohrloff, and was attended by “a great many German officers, soldiers and colonists with music, [patriotic] speeches and social interaction” From the perspective of the German army press, the event was “extremely enjoyable;” it was accompanied with music by a 30-piece regiment orchestra, and beer, sausage, sandwiches, ice-cream, raspberries and cherries were sold. It closed with a “small dance,” raising 7,387 rubles or 9,850 German marks in donations ( note 1 ). Later that summer, a Ludendorff Festival in Halbstadt began with Sunday worship, followed by an early concert, games and performances by the Selbstschutz , as well as “entertainment and merriment of every kind,” with short plays and dancing into the morning ( note ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...
Post a Comment
Read more