Skip to main content

German Military in Southern Ukraine, 1918: Photos

Photographs of German troops in southern Ukraine, 1918, have recently come to light. These offer a new window on Mennonite life during the short period of "friendly" German occupation. A number of these photographs are attached to this post and complement previous posts on this period (note 1).

On February 17, 1918, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel “Bolshevik invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability (note 2).

Anticipating the imminent arrival of German troops early in 1918, some Mennonites had already taken up arms in self-defense against the anarchist leader Nestor Makhnov; the “thunder” of the cannons in the vicinity gave strong indication that the German army was near (note 3).

Some 450,000 occupying German and Austrian troops changed the equation for the Bolsheviks and anarchists in Ukraine. Some German Mennonites were among those soldiers, including the brother-in-law to teacher and community leader Benjamin H. Unruh.

In his diary, Jacob P. Janzen in Rudnerweide wrote:

May 21, 1918: “A high ranking general was to be here for “klein” [small] breakfast, but only came for lunch. He is a Prussian, currently from Melitopol, and is the Chairman and Adjutant. … On our street an honour display had been set up, decorated with flowers and grass. After breakfasting he shook hands with all the Rudnerweide people, asking them whether they were local people and if their name was of German origin. He also spoke to the children and when he left the children threw flowers into his car. He waved to all and on the street … gentlemen took off their hats and waved with them.” (Note 4)

Also in May a decree by the occupation forces made courses in the “art of war” obligatory for Mennonite school children up to age twelve, as well as for older youth to age eighteen. Men eighteen to forty were to be conscripted for eight weeks of training for a minimum of twelve hours per week; women could join as well, but were not obligated (note 5).

But this step was not as obvious as the Germans had expected. Because the use of arms for organized self-defence was something novel in the tradition, the General Mennonite Conference of Churches organized four days of meetings in Lichtenau on “the confession of non-resistance among Mennonites” and “political questions” (note 6). The church was required to respond by July 4 on the esta­­­­blishment of self-defence militia units.

Informed debate was however difficult; the German occupying force heavily censored the Mennonite press from publishing articles supporting non-resistance (note 7). The Deutsche Zeitung für Ost-Taurien, published by the German army administration at Melitopol, printed a column that challenged the “inner justification” of biblical pacifism in response to the Mennonite congress in Lichtenau, and framed the division in the community generationally: “While the younger, progressively-minded portion of congregations declared their willingness to accept universal conscription, the older ones were against it.” The columnist—likely an army chaplain—closed his biblical argument with a reminder: “When the Bolshevist reign was broken, who was here in Melitopol first to request [German] military protection and weapons for self-defence?—The Mennonites!” (note 8). German army leadership around Melitopol and estate owners were dependent upon each other (note 9).

Janzen’s diary gives us a snapshot of how this was experienced on the ground.

"August 1918: Two of the Germans began a military drill in our forest with our volunteers for the Selbstschutz, 20 young men from our village and 10 from Großweide. Four days later we received a notice that all men from 18 to 45 years old were to appear at a general meeting with the village mayor. The German was there too and read an order out of a little notebook, telling us to join the Selbstschutz, all men age 18 to 25. If there were not enough of these he would conscript older men too. The order was signed only by initials of some unknown person. And he expected us to accept! Did he really think us that stupid? Brother David [a minister] and I and many others spoke strongly against it." (Note 10)

As late as mid-September, the official German press written for both soldiers and settlers found it necessary to explain the rationale for a Selbstschutz to reluctant communities, offer examples of success, and entice “eager, cheerful” young men for a training with purpose, that promised not to be “uninteresting.”

“The occupation of every village and of every larger estate [with troops] in all of Taurien is obviously impossible. In order to give residents the possibility to defend their property and possessions from those uncertain and indolent elements, the German military authority has commanded the creation of a Selbstschutz in every village community. They are not to replace the military force, but to support them where a late arrival of military forces can be expected.” (Note 11)

In 1918 in the Region of Taurien (including Crimea), there were 56,000 German Lutherans, 27,000 German Catholics, 50,000 Mennonites and a smaller community of German Baptists (note 12). The new sense of German ethnic brotherhood and incautious enthusiasm for the Reich would come back to haunt the German settlements later that year—and for decades to come.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: I thank Dr. James Urry for sharing a link to a portfolio containing 263 photographs documenting the advance of the German Flight Squadron 27 in the Ukraine during Spring and Summer of 1918, from Southern Methodist University, Texas, https://digitalcollections.smu.edu/digital/collection/eaa/id/668. See previous posts: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/april-19-1918-mennonites-in-ukraine.html and https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/becoming-german-ludendorff-festivals-in.html. 

Note 2: Cf. Oberste Heeresleitung, “Denkschrift: Über die Wahrung der Interessen des Reiches in den neuen Ost-Staaten in strategischer, wirtschaftlicher und verkehrspolitischer Hinsicht durch Konzessionsierung einer Osteuropäischen Verkehr-Gesellschaft (June 1918),” Reichskanzlei Kriegsakten 4:2, vol. 3 (März–Juli 1918), 185–188 (BArchR 43/2406). From Bundesarchiv Berlin-Lichterfelde, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/; also Vzfw. (Sergeant) Rießner, “Das Ziel des deutschen Einmarsches in die Ukraine,” Deutsche Zeitung für Ost-Taurien [DZOT] 1, no. 40 (July 25, 1918), 2f., https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/suche?queryString=PPN777397188. See esp. Wolfram Dornik, et al., The Emergence of Ukraine: Self-Determination, Occupation, and War in Ukraine, 1917–1922, translated by Gus Fagan (Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 2015).

Note 3: “H.U.” [Halbstadt Elder H. Unruh] wrote May 18, just shortly after German occupation, that “after having taken up arms for our own self-defence, we will likely be required to do the same for the protection of the Fatherland” (Volksfreund II/XI, no. 20 /38 [May 18, 1918], 2), https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk25.pdf. Another writer also refers to the use of weapons by Mennonites prior to German occupation “to protect our earthly goods” (Volksfreund II, no. 15 [April 23, 1918], 1; link broken). Cf. Gerhard Schroeder, Miracles of Grace and Judgement: A Family Strives for Survival During the Russian Revolution (Lodi, CA: Self-published, 1974), 28f.

Note 4: Jacob P. Janzen, “Diary 1911–1919. English monthly summaries," edited and translated by Katharina Wall Janzen. From Mennonite Heritage Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Jacob P. Janzen fonds, 1911–1946, vol. 2341.

Note 5: Notice in Volksfreund II, no. 20 (May 18, 1918), 6, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk25.pdf. The arming and military organization of colonists into local Selbstschutz units was directed by Berlin, as was the support for a strong crop for export (cf. Jochen Oltmer, Migration und Politik in der Weimarer Republik [Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005], 177f.).

Note 6: Friedensstimme 16, no. 36 (July 23, 1918), 1, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk47.pdf. Old “mission-friends” felt that reporting on the real “work of the kingdom of God,” namely the mission work in Sumatra and Java, was squeezed out.

Note 7: For example, Jakob Wiebe’s paper in support of non-resistance presented at the Lichtenau General Conference of the Mennonite Congregations in Russia, June 30 to July 2, 1918, was only published a year later (cf. “Zur Wehrlosigkeit der Mennoniten,” Friedensstimme 17, no. 27 [August 10, 1919]: 2f., https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk51.pdf). The editor, who was completely exasperated by his German army censor, noted apologetically that the article would have been impossible to publish under occupation, and was held back.

Note 8: “Die Mennoniten und die allgemeine Wehrpflicht,” DZOT 1, no. 27 (July 10, 1918), 2, https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/suche?queryString=PPN777397188.

Note 9: Cf. “Biography of Jacob Cornelius Toews, 1882–1968,” translated by Frieda Toews Baergen (Essex-Kent Mennonite Historical Association Leamington), 27f., https://www.ekmha.ca/collections/items/show/42.

Note 10: J. Janzen, “Diary 1916–1919.”

Note 11: “Selbstschutz,” DZOT no. 87 (September 18, 1918): 2, https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/suche?queryString=PPN777397188.

Note 12: Cf. A. Bühler, “Das Deutschtum in Taurien,” Deutschtum im Ausland, no. 36 (1918), 358-362, https://books.google.ca/books?id=4wo2IhXfUskC.

----

The following photographs are from a portfolio containing 263 photographs documenting the advance of the German Flight Squadron 27 in the Ukraine during Spring and Summer of 1918, from the Digital Collections of Southern Methodist University (SMU), Texas, https://digitalcollections.smu.edu/digital/collection/eaa/id/668. 





Print Friendly and PDF
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The End of Schardau (and other Molotschna villages), 1941

My grandmother was four-years old when her parents moved from Petershagen, Molotschna to Schardau in 1908. This story is larger than that of Schardau, but tells how this village and many others in Molotschna were evacuated by Stalin days before the arrival of German troops in 1941. -ANF The bridge across the Dnieper at Chortitza was destroyed by retreating Soviet troops on August 18, 1941 and the hydroelectric dam completed near Einlage in 1932 was also dynamited by NKVD personnel—killing at least 20,000 locals downstream, and forcing the Germans to cross further south at Nikopol. For the next six-and-a-half weeks, the old Mennonite settlement area of Chortitza was continuously shelled by Soviet troops from Zaporozhje on the east side of the river ( note 1 ). The majority of Russian Germans in Crimea and Ukraine paid dearly for Germany’s Blitzkrieg and plans for racially-based population resettlements. As early as August 3, 1941, the Supreme Command of the Soviet Forces received noti...
Post a Comment
Read more