Skip to main content

“First Arrival of German Troops in Halbstadt” (Volksfreund, April 20, 1918)

“April 19, 1918 will always remain significant in the history of the Molotschna German Colony. That which until recently could hardly be imagined has occurred: the German military has arrived to free us from the despotism, rape and pillaging of barbarous people and to reestablish the order and security of life and property--something desperately necessary for our land. For this we give thanks above all to the One in whose hands the peoples and nations and also individuals rest. ...” (Note 1)

Mennonites greeted their “guests and liberators” with festivities that included baked goods (Zwieback), meats and even the German anthem “Deutschland, Deutschland über alles"—all before the watchful eyes of their Russian /Ukrainian neighbours.

The troops arrived by train; and to the shock of most present, three bound prisoners—all well-known bandits and terrorists—“were brought out of one of the railway cars without any prior notice, lined up and shot right in front of us” as an example (note 2).

The arrival of German troops in brought an immediate cessation to the oppressive demands of the Bolsheviks and to arbitrary pillaging and terror.

Only three days earlier “guns had been received from Tokmak for our [Mennonite] militia men” (note 3); the support for self-defense was overwhelming in the central Mennonite town of Halbstadt (Molotschna): “Everybody was for it; all the preachers of every persuasion,” according to one eyewitness (note 4).

In the first days fleeing local Bolshevik leaders were rounded up and arrested, including two Bolshevik Mennonites—Johann Wiebe of Lichtenau, Gerhard Friesen of Gnadenfeld—and “some others.” Wiebe and Friesen were executed by the Germans, and later three other Mennonites as well: a Peter Braun of Lichtenau, a Neufeld from the Molotschna, and a Huebert from Nikolaipol (note 5). In another case, minister and teacher Jacob H. Janzen together with Philipp Cornies “interceded for eleven soldiers of the Red Army who were held by the German commander and were to be shot” (note 6).

The Mennonite press asked the community’s most pressing question: "Why had God had allowed us to suffer?" To dispel all thought that they may somehow be religious martyrs, Abraham Kröker drew an explicit contrast to “our martyr fathers” who in clear conscience “suffered for the sake of the highest things.” Rather

“… we have suffered because of 'Mammon' which we pursued too vigorously. We were far too materialistic, too selfish. That is why God first sent the Land Liquidation Laws; and when he did not achieve his goal, the knife had to cut deeper. A man is punished with that with which he sins. Do we understand this? Have we learnt anything?” (Note 7).

The moral problem was widespread. A German wartime internee placed under Mennonites in the Orenburg/ Samara region wrote to a German military newspaper that Mennonites—or “Mammon-ites” as he preferred to refer to them “were a hypocritical, miserly, money-sucking people” (note 8). Another wrote: “The most complaints have been voiced against the German Mennonites in the region of Samara, who have often exploited the plight of the deportees” (note 9).

While during the war Mennonites sought to convince the state that they were Dutch and not German, and should not be subject to land liquidation measures, by May 1918 Mennonites participated in a “Congress of Representatives of the German Settlements” in Prischib—across the Molotschna River from Halbstadt. A resolution was passed unanimously to request the German Kaiser to grant citizenship to German colonists in South Russia. The resolution indicated their wish “to organize a German state structure” and “to remain here as German forerunners and pioneers … [or to] return to the German motherland” (note 10). In turn, they promised “to offer themselves unreservedly to the German homeland, economically and militarily” (note 11).

The next day the new local self-government was established and two Mennonites—W. A. Hausknecht and J. H. Schröder—took the leadership roles in the regional self-defence committee (note 12). The old mayoral system was reinstated; mayors were responsible to resolve conflicts in the village in good conscience and wisdom. Voting rights were again only extended to land owners.

Previous Russian land liquidation laws were nullified (note 13), and confiscated property was returned to original owners.

In the Mennonite villages the once-wealthy—often accompanied by the Ukrainian National Guard and the German military—went house-to-house to identify property and goods. Mennonite “rich women went to the houses of the poor and demanded back their pillows, lamps, chickens, pets and jars. Here is where the real hatred was engendered,” according to one contemporary (note 14). In some cases a hand of friendship and forgiveness was extended, but there was also public flogging, verbal abuse, threats, and expulsions.

Old antagonisms and social divides in the Molotschna separating those with land, those with small-farms (Kleinwirtschaften), and the cottagers without land (Anwohner) resurfaced immediately; Mennonite youth leaders were very conscious and critical of a return to the previous status quo (note 15).

After two months of terror (February and March) the community had not learnt its lesson: “Many of our brethren treat their workers worse than before, provide less to eat, and use violence to force the servants to serve” (note 16).

As this continued into the summer, the German captain and district commander issued a stern public notice that wealthier residents were “creating an atmosphere amongst the poorer classes that will make any peaceful and fruitful work together impossible” (note 17. The directive noted that “it is a great error if some well-to-do people believe that the German troops have entered into the land only to protect the well-to-do.” The captain firmly expected “that in the future more tolerance will prevail, especially between ethnic brethren (eigenen Stammesbrüdern)” (note 18).

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pic: German occupation troops in Melitopol; General von Kosch. Text at lower left says "Exzellenz General v. Kosch b. d. Melitopoler Besatzung." https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/numbered-photos/pholist2.php?num=2004-0102&fbclid=. 

Note 1: Volksfreund II (XI), no. 14 (32) (April 20, 1918), 1, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk19.pdf;

Note 2: See; Heinrich F. Goerz, Molotschna Settlement, trans. by Al Reimer and John B. Toews (Winnipeg, MB: CMBC, 1993), 228; John B. Toews, “Origins and Activities of the Mennonite Selbstschutz (1918–1919),” Mennonite Quarterly Review 46, no. 1 (January 1972), 5–40; 15. For larger context, see Wolfram Dornik et al, The Emergence of Ukraine: Self-Determination, Occupation, and War in Ukraine, 1917–1922, translated by Gus Fagan (Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 2015).

Note 3: John P. Dyck, ed., Troubles and Triumphs 1914–1924: Excerpts from the Diary of Peter J. Dyck, Ladekopp, Molotschna Colony, Ukraine (Springstein, MB: Self-published, 1981), entry for April 18, 1918.

Note 4: A. Wiens, letter to B. B. Janz, cited in Josephine Chipman, “The Mennonite Selbstschutz in the Ukraine: 1918–1919” (Master of Arts thesis, University of Manitoba, 1988), 92. https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/xmlui/handle/1993/3535.

Note 5: Cf. Volksfreund II (XI), no. 14 (32) (April 20, 1918), 1, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk19.pdf; no. 22 (40) (May 31, 1918), 7, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk27.pdf.

Note 6: Heinz Janzen, “Jacob H. Janzen—at Home,” Mennonite Life 6, no. 3 (July 1951), 36. https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1951jul.pdf.

Note 7: Abraham Kröker, “Unsere Befreiung,” Volksfreund II (XI), no. 16 (34) (April 27, 1918), 1.

Note 8: Julius Wolff, “Aus der russischen Internierungszeit (Fortsetzung),” Kriegszeitung von Baranowitschi 3, no. 20 (March 9, 1918), “Beilage;” no. 21 (March 13, 1918), “Beilage.” http://resolver.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/SBB0002023600010095.

Note 9: “Aus der Heimat,” Rumänische Feldpost: Soldatenzeitung (July 24, 1918), 4, http://resolver.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/SBB00014F7800010000.

Note 10: In John B. Toews, ed., Mennonites in Ukraine amid Civil War and Anarchy (1917–1920): A Documentary Collection (Fresno, CA: Center for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 2013) 52. Cf. Thy Kingdom Come: The Diary of Johann J. Nickel of Rosenhof: 1918-1919 (ed. John P. Nickel [Saskatoon, SK: Self-published, 1978], May 31, 1918, 47; May 2, 1918, 44), which references both the decision in Prischib and the broader Mennonite support in Chortitza for German citizenship. The official German response to colonists in Russia was, in contrast, very cautious; cf. Friedensstimme 16, no. 32 (July 9, 1918), 5, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk43.pdf.

Note 11: “Vertrauensrat russischer Kolonisten,” Deutsche Zeitung für Ost-Taurien (Melitopol, Ukraine) no. 3 (June 12, 1918), 3, http://resolver.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/SBB00014E4200000000.

Note 12: Volksfreund II, no. 22 (May 31, 1918) 7, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk27.pdf.

Note 13: Cf. “Die Liquidation der Deutschstämmigen,” Deutsche Zeitung für Ost-Taurien, Part I, no. 136 (November 15, 1918), 2; Part II, no. 137 (November 16, 1918), 2, http://resolver.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/SBB00014E4200000000.

Note 14: Gerhard Schroeder, Miracles of Grace and Judgement: A Family Strives for Survival During the Russian Revolution (Lodi, CA: Self-published, 1974), 28f.

Note 15: Gerhard A. Peters, “Die christliche Jugendpflege, ihre Notwendigkeit und Bedeutung (Fortsetzung),” presented at the General Conference of Mennonite Churches, Lichtenau, June 30–July 2, 1918, in Friedensstimme XVI, no. 34 (July 16, 1918), 2, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk45.pdf.

Note 16: Volksfreund II (XI), no. 19 (37) (May 11, 1918), 7, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk24.pdf; Christlicher Familienkalender 21 (1919), 60: “On the whole, one has the impression that the earlier materialistic (selfish) disposition has not only not diminished, but has actually increased,” https://chortitza.org/Pis/CFK19a.pdf.

Note 17: Friedensstimme 16, no. 33 (July 13, 1918), 3, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk44.pdf.

Note 18: Ibid.





Print Friendly and PDF
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Swiss and Palatinate Connections

Sometime after 1850 Andreas Plennert and his family immigrated to South Russia from the Culm Region of West Prussia. Though there was at least one Mennonite “Plehnert” who had already immigrated to Russia in 1793, it is not a very common Prussian-Russian Mennonite name. As such, however, it is easier to trace than many and offers a minority narrative and identity within the longer and broader Russian Mennonite story. The account below is adapted largely from information in Horst Penner, Die ost- und westpreußischen Mennoniten , vol. 1, though I have expanded upon his work to offer a slightly different narrative. In 1724 there was a group of Mennonites forced out of the Memel region in East Prussia for political and religious reasons and were given assistance to resettle back to West Prussia in areas populated by Mennonites. Among the 23 households that went to the Stuhm region there is one Plenert listed, namely Christian Plenert. We know that Mennonites entered the Memel region ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Last Days of Mennonite Life on the Molotschna, September 1943

The Molotschna Mennonite Colony was established in 1803; 140 years later its villages were evacuated by retreating German armies. A map of the larger German operation of 1943 and the various "Trecks" is attached. The tens of thousands of evacuees included some 35,000 Mennonites. Nazi Germany had utterly failed Ukrainians, but continued to have plans for their "ethnic Germans" in the east. On Sept. 8, 1943 , the Red Army successfully took Donetsk (Stalino), 230 km east of Molotschna. The next day, S.S. administrators gave orders that every Molotschna family should load one wagon with their possessions and prepare for an orderly evacuation. Hitler was intent on holding Crimea, and sought to set up a defensive line from Zaporizhzhia to Melitopol and south to the Sea of Azov. Evacuation plans east of this line were in place since late June—initially to be resettled “somewhere” west of the Dnieper; on Aug. 17 first steps were taken to move 8,000 hospital beds west o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

The Shift from Dutch to German, 1700s

Already in 1671, Mennonite Flemish Elder Georg Hansen in Danzig published his German-language catechism ( Glaubens-Bericht für die Jugend ) as preparation for youth seeking baptism. Though educational competencies varied, Hansen’s Glaubens-Bericht assumed that youth preparing for baptism had a stronger ability to read complex German than Dutch ( note 1 ). Popular Mennonite preacher Jacob Denner (1659–1746), originally from the Hamburg-Altona Mennonite Church, lived in Danzig for four years in the early 1700s. A first volume of his Dutch sermons was published in 1706 in Danzig and Amsterdam, and then in 1730 and 1751 he published two German collections. Untrained preachers would often read Denner’s sermons: “Those who preached German—which all Prussian preachers around 1750 did, with the exception of the Danzig preachers—had no sermons books from their co-religionists other than this one by Jacob Denner” ( note 2 ). In Danzig and the Vistula Delta region there were some differences...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Danzig and Poland?

In the late 16th century, Poland became a haven for a variety of non-conformists which included Jews, Anti-Trinitarians from Italy and Bohemia, Quakers and Calvinists from Great Britain, south German Schwenkfelders, Eastern Orthodox, Armenian, and Greek Catholic Christians, some Muslim Tatars, as well as other peaceful sectarians like the Dutch and Flemish Anabaptists. Unlike the Low Countries and most of western Europe, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was a “state without stakes,” and as such fittingly described as “God’s playground” ( note 1 ). In the view of 17th-century Dutch dramatist Joost van den Vondel, it was “the ‘Promised Land,’ where the refugee could forget all his sorrow and enjoy the richness of the land” ( note 2 ). Over the next two centuries an important strand of Mennonite life and spirituality evolved into a mature tradition in this relatively hospitable context ( note 3 ). Anabaptists from the Low Countries began to arrive in Danzig and region as early as 15...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eugenics and Euthanasia: Russian Mennonites and the Third Reich

Little surprises me when I write about Russian Mennonites caught “between the devil and the deep blue sea.” A 1944 letter I found recently from Mennonite Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh however offers a new and disturbing snapshot of this leader and the Russian Mennonite community under the umbrella of the Third Reich ( note 1 ). It is not too much to say that this larger-than-life leader stands at the centre of almost every significant Russian Mennonite story between 1915 and 1945, including community decisions during the revolution, the formation of MCC, the emigration of 20,000 Russländer, the miracle release of thousands gathered at the gates of Moscow, 1929-30, the creation of the Paraguayan Fernheim Colony, famine relief in the 1930s, the Canadian debates about identity and worldview in Der Bote and the Rundschau papers, and almost everything that happened with Mennonites in Ukraine from 1941 to 1945. His importance for the Mennonite story cannot be understated. Even for many conte...
Post a Comment
Read more