Russian Mennonites and German troop withdrawal, Advent 1918

First Advent, 1918: The last page of the final issue of the German military newspaper Deutsche Zeitung für Ost-Taurien (DZOT), informed readers of a German Catholic mass at the Mennonite Church in Melitopol (near the large Mennonite settlement of Molotschna) for 8 am, followed by a Protestant (Lutheran) Military Advent worship service at 9 am (pic), with the Mennonite worship service beginning at 11 am.

A week earlier they had done the same to honour their fallen comrades on Eternity Sunday (Totensonntag)—in the Mennonite worship space. The Mennonite colonists—“especially Molotschna”—became “trusted friends,” whose assistance, hospitality and German manner created a “second home” for the troops, who now understood that “they belong inseparably together as members of one people (Stamm),” according to the editor (note 1; pic).

Not only did troops give away German books, refrigerators, phonographs, recordings, movie projectors, distillery equipment, typewriters, linens, foot-ware, cooking pots, horses and more at fire-sale prices (see pics; note 2), but they also left thousands of weapons for the colonists and the White Army, including ammunition and grenades (note 3).

The Austrian military in Jekaterinoslav—including the Chortitza, Barotov and Memrik Mennonite settlements—were less concerned with the Bolshevik or anarchist threat according to estate owner Jacob C. Toews, and handed their weapons off to “the terrorist hordes” (note 4).

The short-lived Ukraine National Republic had withdrawn from WW I months earlier and appealed to Germany and Austria for assistance to repel Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability.

Over the preceding months both German officers and Mennonite leadership were convinced that good order had been restored, and that security moving forward might be expected with strong economic and political ties between Ukraine and Germany; the German Foreign Institute (Deutsches Auslands-Institut) made connections with these Black Sea Germans a priority (note 5).

However for weeks Bolshevik and anarchist armed riders had been stirring up renewed havoc in the region around the Molotschna (note 6).

With the formal end of WW I, the general of the last German division to withdraw from the district held a farewell speech in the large Halbstadt Mennonite Church, and warned of the imminent threat posed by the bandits, while pointing to the Mennonite Selbstschutz—well-armed and well-trained by the retreating German army (note 7).

Together with men from the neighbouring Lutheran and German Catholic villages, the local militia included a cavalry of three-hundred men, and twenty companies of infantry of approximately 2,000 to 2,700 volunteers in total, plus a few remaining German officers.

Of these about 1,000 soldiers were recruited from the Halbstadt and Gnadenfeld Mennonite districts of Molotschna including those from estates, who together formed the “First Mennonite Infantry Regiment” as they referred to themselves (note 8).

Russian White officers took over control of the Molotschna administrative offices at Halbstadt and Gnadenfeld and placed the Mennonite Selbstschutz under the regional White Commander, Colonel Malakov (note 9).

The influential Mennonite teacher and theologian Benjamin H. Unruh framed the situation as follows:

"… this was not about the rich historical legacy of refusing armed military service, but the recognition of the right to self-defense with respect to crimes against the very lives of innocent people, in particular women and children, by criminal elements from the ranks of former army and marine soldiers … It was exclusively about the repulsion of unlawful acts of violence by self-proclaimed, local and limited regionally operative forces in the form of individual gangs or groups of gangs. Certainly our Anabaptist forefathers were never thinking of such a case when they penned the Schleitheim Confession 400 years ago … ." (Note 10)

For Unruh, armed defense by Mennonites in this extraordinary state of emergency was “not a general abandonment of the received tradition of non-resistance;” the renunciation of every armed force remains the “highest Christian ideal.” Rather, armed defense is a theologically tolerable option, a question of conscience—however difficult and painful—for each to answer on their own before God.

Unruh’s aim was to help the younger graduates of his Halbstadt Commerce School in particular connect what they found necessary to do out of deep conviction with the world of faith and their church (note 11).

“We were all supposedly volunteers although great pressure was put on us to join the Selbstschutz. … Professor Benjamin Unruh’s attitude was one of tacit support for resistance. Somewhat of a shock to me. He was my Bible instructor and was highly educated … . Everyone in Halbstadt looked up to him. I was greatly influenced by his attitude towards the Selbstschutz as were others. … We all understood [however] that when the Red army would come we would not resist soldiers.” (Note 12).

Some 100 to 120 students from the school with some of their teachers formed one of the active Selbstschutz units (note 13).

And so the New Year 1919 began for Mennonites in Ukraine.

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: “Abschied an den Leser,” Deutsche Zeitung für Ost-Taurien [DZOT], no. 149 (November 30, 1918), 4, https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/suche?queryString=PPN777397188.

Note 2: Cf. e.g., advertisements in DZOT, no. 142 (November 22, 1918) 4; no. 145 (November 26, 1918) 4; no. 146 (November 27, 1918), 2.

Note 3: P. Epp, son of Pordenau Elder (Bishop) Peter Epp, reported that he traveled to the Crimea as a member of the Selbstschutz to collect and transport 1,125 hand weapons, including munitions, four machine guns, hand grenades, steel helmets, etc., that were left behind by German troops (J. Epp, in Josephine Chipman, “The Mennonite Selbstschutz in the Ukraine: 1918–1919” (Master of Arts thesis, University of Manitoba, 1988), 140, https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/xmlui/handle/1993/3535. See also “Nonresistance on Trial, or Selbsterlebtes u. Selbstschutz: Molotschna Mennonite Settlement, 1918–1919,” 2, no date, from Mennonite Library and Archive, Bethel College, KS, https://mla.bethelks.edu/books/289_74771_Se48.pdf.

Note 4: Jacob C. Toews, “Biography of Jacob Cornelius Toews, 1882–1968,” translated by Frieda Toews Baergen (Leamington: Essex-Kent Mennonite Historical Association), 28, https://www.ekmha.ca/collections/files/original/9856b7fca8c0ab6fdaa861245404166e.pdf.

Note 5: Cf. DZOT, no. 106 (October 10, 1918), 4; no. 134 (November 13, 1918), 2f.; no. 143 (November 1918), 2f.

Note 6: Cf. Graf Stauffenberg, Friedensstimme 16, no 45 (August 1918), 3; and Abraham Kröker, “Vergiß nicht!,” Friedensstimme XVI, no. 47 (August 31, 1918), 2; Diary of Anna Baerg, 1916–1924, translated and edited by Gerald Peters (Winnipeg, MB: CMBC Publications, 1985), 29.

Note 7: “Nonresistance on Trial, or Selbsterlebtes u. Selbstschutz,” 2.

Note 8: “Nonresistance on Trial, or Selbsterlebtes u. Selbstschutz,” 2; Lawrence Klippenstein, “Mennonites and Military Service in the Soviet Union to 1939,” in Challenge to Mars: Essays on Pacifism from 1918 to 1945, edited by Peter Brock and Thomas P. Socknat, 3–20 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999), 7; John B. Toews, editor and translator, Mennonites in Ukraine amid Civil War and Anarchy, ed. Mennonites in Ukraine amid Civil War and Anarchy (1917–1920): A Documentary Collection (Fresno, CA: Center for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 2013), 97.

Note 9: John B. Toews, “The Origins and Activities of the Mennonite Selbstschutz (1918–1919),” Mennonite Quarterly Review 46, no. 1 (1972), 5–40; 17.

Note 10: Cited in Heinrich B. Unruh, Fügungen und Führungen: Benjamin Heinrich Unruh, 1881–1959: Ein Leben im Geiste christlicher Humanität und im Dienste der Nächstenliebe (Detmold: Verein zur Erforschung und Pflege des Russlanddeutschen Mennonitentums, 2009) 139f.

Note 11: Cited in H. Unruh, Fügungen und Führungen, 141. In comparison, as early as 1743 most Dutch Mennonites no longer referred to themselves as “defenseless Christians” (as in the longer title of the Martyrs Mirror); rather, they were Christians who did-not-take-revenge or use violence for an offensive attack or war. They did however allow the use of counter-violence to ward off unjust violence, and had no problem delivering their goods on armed carriages, mounting cannons on their own ships and—in some cases—even carrying a weapon when travelling outside of the city (cf. Simeon F. Rues, Aufrichtige Nachrichten von dem Gegenwärtigen Zustande der Mennoniten oder Taufgesinnten wie auch der Collegianten oder Reinsburger [Jena, 1743], 103f., https://books.google.ca/books?id=aqBdAAAAcAAJ).

Note 12: Gerhard Wiens, in Irmgard Epp, ed., Constantinoplers—Escape from Bolshevism (Victoria, BC: Trafford, 2006), 47f.

Note 13: “Nonresistance on Trial, or Selbsterlebtes u. Selbstschutz.”

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Russian Mennonites and German troop withdrawal, Advent 1918," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), January 21, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/russian-mennonites-and-german-troop.html.

Comments

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws. It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Immigration to Canada, 1923: Background

In April 1921 Mennonites in the Caucasus and Don Region officially petitioned Moscow for permissions to emigrate—which Lenin had “flatly refused.” Their rationale was more than economic. “The disruption of economic conditions leads to impoverishment, which again goes hand in hand with the degradation of morals and has an alarming impact on our youth, who are also constantly exposed to the pressure of brutal and ruthless agitation on the part of those in power. … This decay of our spiritual and economic goods will only become greater and more ruinous.” ( Note 1 ) Later that year and some months before the large-scale feeding operations could begin in the Soviet Union, American Mennonite Relief (AMR) commissioner A.J. Miller petitioned the Soviet Embassy in London for exit permissions for 20,000 Mennonites ( note 1b) . He was unsuccessful. Nonetheless in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, key Mennonite leaders took a decision to work toward the re...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement! In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog