Russian Mennonites and German troop withdrawal, Advent 1918

First Advent, 1918: The last page of the final issue of the German military newspaper Deutsche Zeitung für Ost-Taurien (DZOT), informed readers of a German Catholic mass at the Mennonite Church in Melitopol (near the large Mennonite settlement of Molotschna) for 8 am, followed by a Protestant (Lutheran) Military Advent worship service at 9 am (pic), with the Mennonite worship service beginning at 11 am.

A week earlier they had done the same to honour their fallen comrades on Eternity Sunday (Totensonntag)—in the Mennonite worship space. The Mennonite colonists—“especially Molotschna”—became “trusted friends,” whose assistance, hospitality and German manner created a “second home” for the troops, who now understood that “they belong inseparably together as members of one people (Stamm),” according to the editor (note 1; pic).

Not only did troops give away German books, refrigerators, phonographs, recordings, movie projectors, distillery equipment, typewriters, linens, foot-ware, cooking pots, horses and more at fire-sale prices (see pics; note 2), but they also left thousands of weapons for the colonists and the White Army, including ammunition and grenades (note 3).

The Austrian military in Jekaterinoslav—including the Chortitza, Barotov and Memrik Mennonite settlements—were less concerned with the Bolshevik or anarchist threat according to estate owner Jacob C. Toews, and handed their weapons off to “the terrorist hordes” (note 4).

The short-lived Ukraine National Republic had withdrawn from WW I months earlier and appealed to Germany and Austria for assistance to repel Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability.

Over the preceding months both German officers and Mennonite leadership were convinced that good order had been restored, and that security moving forward might be expected with strong economic and political ties between Ukraine and Germany; the German Foreign Institute (Deutsches Auslands-Institut) made connections with these Black Sea Germans a priority (note 5).

However for weeks Bolshevik and anarchist armed riders had been stirring up renewed havoc in the region around the Molotschna (note 6).

With the formal end of WW I, the general of the last German division to withdraw from the district held a farewell speech in the large Halbstadt Mennonite Church, and warned of the imminent threat posed by the bandits, while pointing to the Mennonite Selbstschutz—well-armed and well-trained by the retreating German army (note 7).

Together with men from the neighbouring Lutheran and German Catholic villages, the local militia included a cavalry of three-hundred men, and twenty companies of infantry of approximately 2,000 to 2,700 volunteers in total, plus a few remaining German officers.

Of these about 1,000 soldiers were recruited from the Halbstadt and Gnadenfeld Mennonite districts of Molotschna including those from estates, who together formed the “First Mennonite Infantry Regiment” as they referred to themselves (note 8).

Russian White officers took over control of the Molotschna administrative offices at Halbstadt and Gnadenfeld and placed the Mennonite Selbstschutz under the regional White Commander, Colonel Malakov (note 9).

The influential Mennonite teacher and theologian Benjamin H. Unruh framed the situation as follows:

"… this was not about the rich historical legacy of refusing armed military service, but the recognition of the right to self-defense with respect to crimes against the very lives of innocent people, in particular women and children, by criminal elements from the ranks of former army and marine soldiers … It was exclusively about the repulsion of unlawful acts of violence by self-proclaimed, local and limited regionally operative forces in the form of individual gangs or groups of gangs. Certainly our Anabaptist forefathers were never thinking of such a case when they penned the Schleitheim Confession 400 years ago … ." (Note 10)

For Unruh, armed defense by Mennonites in this extraordinary state of emergency was “not a general abandonment of the received tradition of non-resistance;” the renunciation of every armed force remains the “highest Christian ideal.” Rather, armed defense is a theologically tolerable option, a question of conscience—however difficult and painful—for each to answer on their own before God.

Unruh’s aim was to help the younger graduates of his Halbstadt Commerce School in particular connect what they found necessary to do out of deep conviction with the world of faith and their church (note 11).

“We were all supposedly volunteers although great pressure was put on us to join the Selbstschutz. … Professor Benjamin Unruh’s attitude was one of tacit support for resistance. Somewhat of a shock to me. He was my Bible instructor and was highly educated … . Everyone in Halbstadt looked up to him. I was greatly influenced by his attitude towards the Selbstschutz as were others. … We all understood [however] that when the Red army would come we would not resist soldiers.” (Note 12).

Some 100 to 120 students from the school with some of their teachers formed one of the active Selbstschutz units (note 13).

And so the New Year 1919 began for Mennonites in Ukraine.

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: “Abschied an den Leser,” Deutsche Zeitung für Ost-Taurien [DZOT], no. 149 (November 30, 1918), 4, https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/suche?queryString=PPN777397188.

Note 2: Cf. e.g., advertisements in DZOT, no. 142 (November 22, 1918) 4; no. 145 (November 26, 1918) 4; no. 146 (November 27, 1918), 2.

Note 3: P. Epp, son of Pordenau Elder (Bishop) Peter Epp, reported that he traveled to the Crimea as a member of the Selbstschutz to collect and transport 1,125 hand weapons, including munitions, four machine guns, hand grenades, steel helmets, etc., that were left behind by German troops (J. Epp, in Josephine Chipman, “The Mennonite Selbstschutz in the Ukraine: 1918–1919” (Master of Arts thesis, University of Manitoba, 1988), 140, https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/xmlui/handle/1993/3535. See also “Nonresistance on Trial, or Selbsterlebtes u. Selbstschutz: Molotschna Mennonite Settlement, 1918–1919,” 2, no date, from Mennonite Library and Archive, Bethel College, KS, https://mla.bethelks.edu/books/289_74771_Se48.pdf.

Note 4: Jacob C. Toews, “Biography of Jacob Cornelius Toews, 1882–1968,” translated by Frieda Toews Baergen (Leamington: Essex-Kent Mennonite Historical Association), 28, https://www.ekmha.ca/collections/files/original/9856b7fca8c0ab6fdaa861245404166e.pdf.

Note 5: Cf. DZOT, no. 106 (October 10, 1918), 4; no. 134 (November 13, 1918), 2f.; no. 143 (November 1918), 2f.

Note 6: Cf. Graf Stauffenberg, Friedensstimme 16, no 45 (August 1918), 3; and Abraham Kröker, “Vergiß nicht!,” Friedensstimme XVI, no. 47 (August 31, 1918), 2; Diary of Anna Baerg, 1916–1924, translated and edited by Gerald Peters (Winnipeg, MB: CMBC Publications, 1985), 29.

Note 7: “Nonresistance on Trial, or Selbsterlebtes u. Selbstschutz,” 2.

Note 8: “Nonresistance on Trial, or Selbsterlebtes u. Selbstschutz,” 2; Lawrence Klippenstein, “Mennonites and Military Service in the Soviet Union to 1939,” in Challenge to Mars: Essays on Pacifism from 1918 to 1945, edited by Peter Brock and Thomas P. Socknat, 3–20 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999), 7; John B. Toews, editor and translator, Mennonites in Ukraine amid Civil War and Anarchy, ed. Mennonites in Ukraine amid Civil War and Anarchy (1917–1920): A Documentary Collection (Fresno, CA: Center for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 2013), 97.

Note 9: John B. Toews, “The Origins and Activities of the Mennonite Selbstschutz (1918–1919),” Mennonite Quarterly Review 46, no. 1 (1972), 5–40; 17.

Note 10: Cited in Heinrich B. Unruh, Fügungen und Führungen: Benjamin Heinrich Unruh, 1881–1959: Ein Leben im Geiste christlicher Humanität und im Dienste der Nächstenliebe (Detmold: Verein zur Erforschung und Pflege des Russlanddeutschen Mennonitentums, 2009) 139f.

Note 11: Cited in H. Unruh, Fügungen und Führungen, 141. In comparison, as early as 1743 most Dutch Mennonites no longer referred to themselves as “defenseless Christians” (as in the longer title of the Martyrs Mirror); rather, they were Christians who did-not-take-revenge or use violence for an offensive attack or war. They did however allow the use of counter-violence to ward off unjust violence, and had no problem delivering their goods on armed carriages, mounting cannons on their own ships and—in some cases—even carrying a weapon when travelling outside of the city (cf. Simeon F. Rues, Aufrichtige Nachrichten von dem Gegenwärtigen Zustande der Mennoniten oder Taufgesinnten wie auch der Collegianten oder Reinsburger [Jena, 1743], 103f., https://books.google.ca/books?id=aqBdAAAAcAAJ).

Note 12: Gerhard Wiens, in Irmgard Epp, ed., Constantinoplers—Escape from Bolshevism (Victoria, BC: Trafford, 2006), 47f.

Note 13: “Nonresistance on Trial, or Selbsterlebtes u. Selbstschutz.”

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Russian Mennonites and German troop withdrawal, Advent 1918," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), January 21, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/russian-mennonites-and-german-troop.html.

Comments

The End of Schardau (and other Molotschna villages), 1941

My grandmother was four-years old when her parents moved from Petershagen, Molotschna to Schardau in 1908. This story is larger than that of Schardau, but tells how this village and many others in Molotschna were evacuated by Stalin days before the arrival of German troops in 1941. -ANF The bridge across the Dnieper at Chortitza was destroyed by retreating Soviet troops on August 18, 1941 and the hydroelectric dam completed near Einlage in 1932 was also dynamited by NKVD personnel—killing at least 20,000 locals downstream, and forcing the Germans to cross further south at Nikopol. For the next six-and-a-half weeks, the old Mennonite settlement area of Chortitza was continuously shelled by Soviet troops from Zaporozhje on the east side of the river ( note 1 ). The majority of Russian Germans in Crimea and Ukraine paid dearly for Germany’s Blitzkrieg and plans for racially-based population resettlements. As early as August 3, 1941, the Supreme Command of the Soviet Forces received noti...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...

What were Molotschna Mennonites reading in the early 1840s?

Johann Cornies expanded his Agricultural Society School library in Ohrloff to become a lending library “for the instruction and better enlightenment of every adult resident.” The library was overseen by the Agricultural Society; in 1845, patrons across the colony paid 1 ruble annually to access its growing collection of 355 volumes (see note 1 ). The great majority of the volumes were in German, but the library included Russian and some French volumes, with a large selection of handbooks and periodicals on agronomy and agriculture—even a medical handbook ( note 2 ). Philosophical texts included a German translation of George Combe’s The Constitution of Man ( note 3 ) and its controversial theory of phrenology, and the political economist Johann H. G. Justi’s Ergetzungen der vernünftigen Seele —which give example of the high level of reading and reflection amongst some colonists. The library’s teaching and reference resources included a history of science and technology with an accomp...

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2 is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Penmanship: School Exercise Samples, 1869 and 1883

Johann Cornies recommended “penmanship as the pedagogical means for [developing] a sense of beauty” ( note 1 ). Schönschreiben --calligraphy or penmanship--appears in the handwritten school plans and manuals of Tobias Voth (Ohrloff, 1820), Jakob Bräul (Rudnerweide, 1830), and Heinrich Heese (Ohrloff, 1842). Heese had a list of related supplies required for each pupil, including “a Bible, slate, slate pencil, paper, straight edge, lead pencil, quill pen, quill knife, ink bottle, three candlesticks, three snuffers, and a container to keep supplies; the teacher will provide water color ( Tusche ) and ink” ( note 2 ). The standard school schedule at this time included ten subject areas: Bible; reading; writing; recitation and composition; arithmetic; geography; singing; recitation and memory work; and preparation of the scripture for the following Sunday worship—and penmanship ( note 3 ). Below are penmanship samples first from the Molotschna village school of Tiege, 1869. This student...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws. It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog