In Search of a Country: Russian Mennonite Self-Presentation to President of Mexico 1921

At the time of greatest need for Mennonites in Russia, they were classified as "undesirables" by the Canadian government (1919):

“… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” (Note 1)

The United States had a “national origins quoto,” which also closed the door to all but a few born in eastern or southern Europe; a letter to the American President met with no success.

Nonetheless, in 1921 Russian Mennonite “study commissioners” A. A. Friesen, Βenjamin Η. Unruh, C. H. Warkentin were charged to explore all options.

Below is a copy of the May 1921 letter sent to the the President of Mexico via the Minister of Fomento (note 2). The letter captures the constructed Russian Mennonite self-identity at this point of loss and trauma. This was their "pitch":

Their ancestors are largely Dutch, the post-world-war letter states, and they belong to those Protestant groups that seek to recover the ideal of ancient Christian simplicity and purity in doctrine and life.
They are non-resistant, and hold fast to the principle of preserving human life, not destroying it.
Wherever Russian Mennonites have settled, they have raised the material prosperity of the surrounding peoples and fortified the foundations of the economy.
By and large they are agriculturalists, who through expert knowledge, diligence, and thrift have always developed model farms as examples to the native population, and have prospered, now owning more than 1.5 million hectares of land.
Russian Mennonites also developed significant manufacturing industries, mills, trading and financial institutions.
In their love of order, sobriety, and loyalty they have always proven to be a state-supporting element.
They are amongst Russia’s most progressive citizens, and have raised and developed the intellectual and cultural life of its people.
Mennonites established 350 village schools, 33 high schools, 1 technical school, 1 school for the deaf, 2 pedagogical schools.
From the start, they placed high value in learning the official language, and developing social-welfare institutions, including plus 8 hospitals, a psychiatric facility, orphanage, and nursing homes.
Russian Mennonites are part of a global faith family, and are supported financially and with advice by brothers and sisters in The Netherlands, the United States and Canada.

While the above presentation was largely true, their Soviet communist critics—and earlier pan-Slavic detractors—would tell a different story:

Mennonites are German sympathizers—Dutch only when advantageous—and culturally prejudiced against Russians and their language.
They are beneficiaries of colonial privilege, and have exploited the land and their neighbours; simplicity has long ceased to be an ideal.
They are willing to bear arms to protect family and property, but not the nation. Moreover, they are deeply and chronically divided amongst themselves.

This is debatable. Now, however, Mennonites were looking to put their best foot forward.

Within a month of sending the letter to Mexico, Study Commissioner A. A. Friesen received a legal opinion that warned of difficulties ahead with Mexico, should they proceed. “I fear that it contains some requests which if granted would be in direct conflict with existing provisions of the Constitution of 1917,” and if granted “would at once be declared of no effect by the Supreme Court” (note 3).

Mexico however was not the only country under consideration. In these same months Canadian “Old Colony” and “Sommerfelder” "cousins" were also looking for a country that would accommodate in law their requests for military exemption, freedom of worship and their own schooling in the German language. Their delegates to Paraguay in 1921 found conditions in the Chaco suitable in every respect with 6,000,000 acres of available land, and a government already in the process of passing all requested exemptions into law (note 4).

Neighbouring Argentina was also explored and initially considered a favourite by the study commissioners. However after further inquiry Argentina was rejected because of unwavering military service requirements.

South Africa was the other favourite with much good land and, according to A. A. Friesen, its Boers were culturally- and ethnically-related people who shared a language similar to the Mennonite Frisian Low German. Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh had just been in London, and reported that there would be no problems from the perspective of the British government for a massive Mennonite settlement in South Africa. The expected travel costs for delegates of ca. $2,500 per person was somewhat prohibitive (note 5).

With the doors to Canada closed, the only real options seemed to be Paraguay and South Africa—and the latter was the preferred choice. Friesen saw potential for much conflict in working together with the more conservative Old Colony and Sommerfelder Mennonites and, like Unruh, he was convinced of South Africa's advantages:

“Of greater importance than Paraguay seems to me to be South Africa. However, I have no exhaustive material at my disposal. Economically, South Africa is undoubtedly very favorable. The language and racial difficulties would be considerably less than in all Latin American countries; perhaps it would also be possible to join the Boers. The Premier of South Africa, Gen. Smuts, is at present in London. I have asked Unruh to make an attempt to get in touch with Smuts. The investigation of S.Africa would be under all be recommended under all circumstances.” (Note 6)

While pursuing all of the options for a new homeland for Russian Mennonites, there was still faint hope that the Canadian post-war ban on Mennonite immigration (re: non-resistance) might be lifted with the right kind of political pressure and persuasion (note 7). And as we know, that did actually happen with a change of government. The 1919 Canadian Order in Council was rescinded early in 1922.

Expecting that this change was coming, in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, Russian Mennonite leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible (note 8).

In the end, some 21,000 Mennonites were able to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada over the next six years before the Soviet Union closed its door (note 9). Paraguay would again become a real option in 1929/30 and later after World War II with new refugee crises.

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Order in Council images below shared by Canadian Senator Peter Harder on Twitter, October 2018.

Note 2: Abram A. Friesen and C. H. Warkentin to the President of Mexico, letter, May 1921. From Mennonite Library and Archives, Bethel College, N. Newton, KS (hereafter MLA-B), https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_60/folder_11_General_correspondence--May-June_1921/037.jpg; and https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_60/folder_11_General_correspondence--May-June_1921/038.jpg; and https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_60/folder_11_General_correspondence--May-June_1921/039.jpg.

Note 3: John L. Brown, to A. Friesen, Hillsboro, KS, June 14, 1921, MLA-B, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_60/folder_11_General_correspondence--May-June_1921/142.jpg.

Note 4: Alvin Solberg to A. A. Friesen, June 7, 1921, letter, MLA-B, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_60/folder_11_General_correspondence--May-June_1921/140.jpg; see also Samuel McRoberts to A. A. Friesen, June 13, 1921 [note typo in date], MLA-B, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_60/folder_11_General_correspondence--May-June_1921/037.jpg. Further correspondence from May to Jue 1921 see MLA-B here: https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_60/folder_11_General_correspondence--May-June_1921/.

Note 5: A. Friesen to W. J. Ewert, letter, May 5, 1921. MLA-B, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_60/folder_11_General_correspondence--May-June_1921/007.jpg, and https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_60/folder_11_General_correspondence--May-June_1921/008.jpg.

Note 6: A. A. Friesen to W. P. Neufeld, letter, June 30, 1921, MLA-B, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_60/folder_11_General_correspondence--May-June_1921/123.jpg.

Note 7: A. A. Friesen, to W. J. Ewert, letter, May 29, 1921, MLA-B. https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_60/folder_11_General_correspondence--May-June_1921/012.jpg.

Note 8: B.B. Janz and Ph. Cornies to Study Commissioners A. A. Friesen, Βenjamin Η. Unruh, C. H. Warkentin; (also) to the General Commission for Foreign Needs of Holland and the American Mennonite Relief, Scottdale, PA, early March 1922. Translated and edited by Harold Bender, “A Russian Mennonite Document of 1922,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 28, no. 2 (April 1954), 143–147; 144f.

Note 9: For next steps in the story, see previous post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/12/the-way-is-finally-openrussian.html; AND https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/02/immigration-to-canada-1923-background.html; AND https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/german-spies-informants-and-emigration.html.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “In Search of a Country: Russian Mennonite Self-Presentation to the President of Mexico 1921,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), December 5, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/12/fraktur-or-gothic-font-and-kurrent-or.html.

Comments

The End of Schardau (and other Molotschna villages), 1941

My grandmother was four-years old when her parents moved from Petershagen, Molotschna to Schardau in 1908. This story is larger than that of Schardau, but tells how this village and many others in Molotschna were evacuated by Stalin days before the arrival of German troops in 1941. -ANF The bridge across the Dnieper at Chortitza was destroyed by retreating Soviet troops on August 18, 1941 and the hydroelectric dam completed near Einlage in 1932 was also dynamited by NKVD personnel—killing at least 20,000 locals downstream, and forcing the Germans to cross further south at Nikopol. For the next six-and-a-half weeks, the old Mennonite settlement area of Chortitza was continuously shelled by Soviet troops from Zaporozhje on the east side of the river ( note 1 ). The majority of Russian Germans in Crimea and Ukraine paid dearly for Germany’s Blitzkrieg and plans for racially-based population resettlements. As early as August 3, 1941, the Supreme Command of the Soviet Forces received noti...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2 is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws. It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog