Skip to main content

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead (note 1). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich.

The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead.

It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur. By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur, and that is only removed in December 1992.

Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer." Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparently! Here is a good summary from a University of Heidelberg online publication:

“This decision was justified by tracing the origin of the 'Gothic script' (Fraktur) back to so-called 'Schwabach Jewish letters.' The Schwabach script is one of the many Fraktur scripts that have been in use since the 15th century. The fact that it was developed by Jews is just as false as all the other apparent justifications that Martin Bormann cites to justify the ban on the use of Fraktur fonts. Due to the strict guild laws, Jews were not even allowed to work in a print shop, let alone buy one. (Note 2)

The article however adds that

“ ... the real reason for the ban was the consideration that fonts printed in Fraktur for foreign countries were difficult or impossible to read for those occupied population groups who were otherwise used to reading Antiqua script. The Fraktur ban was therefore a pragmatic decision by the National Socialists: if they wanted to become a 'world power', they had to use a typeface that the whole world could read.”

And, as another German site presumes, it was important “to ensure the legibility of propaganda and decrees in occupied territories--in anticipation of the desired overall victory in the Second World War” (note 3).

But it was not only printed texts that were impacted by Hitler’s thinking in 1941. Teaching children the old Sütterlin (or Kurrent or “German”) handwriting was also officially discontinued for similar reasons on September 1, 1941 with a decree issued by the Reich Ministry of Science, Education and National Education. Now only Latin-style handwriting was taught and used in schools.

Indeed, Hitler’s decision

“… had a profound effect on everyday German life. Children no longer learned the German script and could therefore no longer read their parents' letters, or only with difficulty. … It was really a kind of cultural revolution. It meant that today's generations can hardly read handwritten documents in German script (and thus from almost 500 years ago!).” (Note 4)

I felt the weight of that some years ago when I received a bundle of letters written by my father's parents in Paraguay in the 1930s and '40s. I could not read them and, as a scholar, that bothered me. Even my mother--born in the Mennonite Molotschna settlement in Ukraine in 1937 and a long-time German school teacher--could not decipher much of the letters either.

But I had learnt Hebrew and Greek, and I even took a Mandarin course. I thought surely I can push myself to learn to read this script. Afterall, I already knew the language, having spent some years in Germany and Switzerland.

And with perserverence it worked, more or less, though it is not without headaches that I slog my way through a handwritten letter, and not without some guesses and errors!

I am also very conscious that children today too are only one small step away from being unable to read our handwritten materials.

But even for those intent on understanding the church and world of Russian Mennonites in their context in previous eras, it is not too late to learn to read things previous generations wrote--and push back against Hitler's decree! And who knows, one may even find the Rundschau and other older writings more hepful and enlightenng to read than many of our newspapers today.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Mennonitische Rundschau, https://archive.org/details/pub_die-mennonitische-rundschau?sort=date.

Note 2: Janina Reibold, “Verbot der Frakturschriften durch die Nationalsozialisten,” (Un!Mut, July 7, 2010, University of Heidelberg), https://www.uni-heidelberg.de/unimut/themen/fraktur-verbot.html.

Note 3: Helmut Stapel, “Sütterlin: Geschichte einer deutschen Schrift, die keine mehr ist,” GEO-Plus Magazin, 2022 (online), https://www.geo.de/wissen/weltgeschichte/suetterlin--die-verbotene-schrift-und-ihre-geschichte-32633438.html.

Note 4: “Geschichte der Sütterlin-Schrift," Sütterlinstube Hamburg, https://suetterlinstube.de/geschichte.php.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Fraktur (or "Gothic") font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), December 4, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/12/fraktur-or-gothic-font-and-kurrent-or.html.

Comments

  1. Anne whetstoneDecember 12, 2023 at 12:05 PM

    My Dad was able to read this beautiful script but my Mom never learned it. My Mom may still have a German hymnal in that script!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß";  note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...
Post a Comment
Read more

"In the Case of Extreme Danger" - Menno Pass and Refugee crisis, 1945-46

"In the Case of Extreme Danger 1. We are Russian-Mennonite refugees who are returning to Holland, the place of origin. The language is Low German. 2. The Dutch Mennonites there, Doopsgezinde , will take in all fellow-believing Mennonites from Russia who are in danger of compulsory repatriation. 3. The first stage of the journey is to Gronau in Westphalia. 4. As a precaution, purchase a ticket to an intermediate stop first. The last connecting station is Rheine. 5. Opposite Gronau is the Dutch city of Enschede, where you will cross the border. 6. On the border ask for Peter Dyck (Piter Daik), Mennonite Central Committee, Amsterdam, Singel 452. Peter Dyck (or his people) will distribute the relevant papers—“Menno Passes”--and provide further information. 7. Any other border points may also be crossed, with the necessary explanations (who, where to, Mennonites from Russia, Peter Dyck, M.C.C., etc.). The Dutch border Patrol is informed. 8. Here the whole matter must be h...
Post a Comment
Read more