Skip to main content

Spiritual Snapshot of Liberated Mennonites in Ukraine: German Mennonite Theo Glück, 1942-43

Nazi German forces in Ukraine found Mennonites depleted and broken—physically, mentally, socially and spiritually—from Stalinist repression.

“Every individual initiative in them has been killed or stifled, because to be an individual is to be suspect, in danger of being reported. They hesitate to express any private opinions, fearing … spies are still at work” (note 1).

The 1942 Commando Dr. Stumpp village reports confirm an almost complete breakdown of social life. “Because of the many frictions on the collective [farm], each became weary and wary (überdrüssig) of the other.” “After collectivization, neighbours no longer wished to see their neighbours.” “If a few people got together, they were politically suspect. No one trusted each other anymore.” “Life on the collective farm embittered people, and they began to hate each other. Each lived for himself alone, in dreary brooding, without hope of a better future” and “happy if on a Sunday he can stay away from the community for a few hours and finally be alone to himself” (note 2).

Mennonite memoirs confirm the same:

  • Abram Reimer: “Everybody watched his tongue, we Mennonites even more than the Russians (note 3).
  • Katie Friesen: “We lived in fear of those who would take what little we had left. … not even neighbours and friends could be trusted. One never knew when one would become a scapegoat for the purposes of the state” (note 4).
  • Victor Janzen: “[Y]ou did not know anymore whom you could trust. … Many a wound, inflicted in those days, is not quite healed even today” (note 5).
  • Helene Dueck: “Honesty, diligence, brotherly love and willingness to help disappeared more and more. Everyone tried to get by in a selfish way, especially in the famine years when everything edible was scarce and thousands died of hunger. Many collaborated with the godless regime. They even betrayed their friends and relatives to save their lives. ... no one could be trusted. A wife often did not know what her husband was thinking, and the husband did not trust his own wife. Children would inform on their parents, and were praised for it at school. One did not know what was right and what was wrong, what was legal and what was illegal” (note 6).

When I lived in Europe two decades ago I met Theo Glück—already 90 years old. In WW2 he was chief paymaster in the Nazi German Airforce stationed for a year at Dnepropetrovsk—between Easter 1942 and 1943—and had good connections with recently liberated Soviet Mennonites. When I met him, he was a long-retired German Mennonite minister and peace activist (note 7).

During the war in 1944 Glück wrote about his encounters with Soviet Mennonites, as a type of plea to his Mennonite contemporaries to open their hearts to these co-religionists. 35,000 had now been evacuated from Ukraine to Warthegau (German-annexed Poland) together with a million other ethnic Germans. Those “who got to know the Mennonite settlements in the East recognized with astonishment and respect the high morals and unshakable character of these valuable people” (note 8).

In this diary-report Glück notes that in Dnepropetrovsk he met socially with a small group of Mennonite young adults who also worked for the occupying German forces. He writes that he was impressed with the questions they posed, with their genuine curiosity about Mennonite congregations in Germany, and about German Mennonite views on the state, church, as well as education. He observed that the Bible was not read regularly in many homes, and that “the old Christian custom of table grace had not yet become common practice again”—even a year after German liberation. The young adults did not know the basic tenants of the Christian faith, let alone the Bible, its books and concepts, or how to interpret it—something Glück and his circle of German Mennonite youth had pursued passionately and at a high level for years, especially in their circular letter (Rundbriefe) writing groups (note 9). While these Soviet Mennonites knew they were “Mennonite,” they had no idea what that meant or how it was unique.

Because of Glück’s piety and rootedness in the church, the Soviet Mennonites asked him about God; they wanted to believe in God’s existence—despite, or in spite, of their atheist education, he wrote. But these youth understood God as something distant, not as a personally present being. Their bitter life experiences brought out the larger existential questions, Glück noted: If God exists, then why this war and why is there suffering and evil in the world?

While they were quite able to explain intellectually the differences between Bolshevism and National Socialism, Glück tried to emphasize to them that Christian faith as “attachment to God” was something altogether different from a worldview. Glück also took efforts to explain the spiritual and intellectual developments in Germany since the Great War. “All of this was completely new to them. Some things seemed unbelievable to them at first; many things excited them.” Notably at this point Glück held faith in God and in the Nazi German leader close together.

Glück was aware that under Stalin Mennonites could not speak of their faith but felt that their “practical Christianity” explicitly communicated their religious attitude and religious thinking. Glück praised the parents and grandparents whose faith withstood the years of intimidation and atheistic propaganda and, despite much human weakness, “passed” the test.

Again, in his report Glück pointed to their “practical Christianity”—a term preferred by the Nazi regime—though employed differently.

Glück connected Mennonite faith and Germanness, convinced that it was their quiet faith that had allowed them to preserve their Germanness—something which the Nazi occupying forces praised. "Practical Christianity" as it has taken shape in the character and life of their own parents, their grandparents, etc., had had a deep formative and communal impact on the Mennonite youth, in his judgement. For him it was incontrovertible proof that their faith was the real reason why Black Sea Mennonites were most successful—according to official reports—in preserving their “Germanness” (95% compared to 50 to 60% among German Catholics in the same region). Their ardent love for the German homeland and the German people is not disconnected from the faith that lives in their hearts, according to Glück.


A long-time observer of Mennonites abroad, and most recently principal of two ethnic German teachers’ colleges in the Ukraine Karl Götz, advised SS superiors in a confidential report that, in his opinion, Mennonite leaders in Germany would be able to guide the Russian Mennonites over time toward an appropriate and “thoroughly German religiosity (Gottgläubigkeit). Their desire is for the divine, for awe before the Almighty, the inconceivable, the sublime. Mennonite leaders are now working to lead the world of Mennonitism (Mennonitentum) toward this German god-believing, religious attitude” (note 10).

These "spiritual snapshots" of Mennonites in Ukraine by a German Mennonite—himself wandering in their own toxic ideological fog—are important reminders of the world from which some Russian Mennonites emerged 80 or so years ago.

Notably after the war, Glück inspired new generations of Mennonite to embrace a global Anabaptist vision as advocates for peace and nonviolence.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Photos: Search WWW on Herbert List, pictures of occupied Ukraine. On List's work during this period, see: https://www.libraryhist.com/2022/09/herbert-lists-pictures-from-german.html.

Note 1: Anonymous, “Zwischen Odessa and Perekop in den ersten Monaten des deusche-russischen Krieges,” Mennonitisches Jahrbuch 1949, cited in Anne Konrad, Red Quarter Moon: A Search for Family in the Shadow of Stalin (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012), 151.

Note 2: “Adelsheim (Chortitza) Dorfbericht,” sec. VII (f), 348b [4] (the Hochfeld, Neuhorst, and Nikolaifeld village reports also use the term “überdrüssig” to describe relationships within their respective village); “Blumengart (Chortitza) Dorfbericht,” sec. VII (f), 484b [4]; “Chortitza Dorfbericht,” sec. VII (f), 7b [4]; “Katharinovka (Borosenko) Dorfbericht,” sec. VII (g), 2b [4]; “Kronstal (Chortitza) Dorfbericht,” sec. VII (f), 443b [4]. From Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, prepared for the German Reichsminister for the Occupied Eastern Territories, 1942. In Bundesarchiv Koblenz, BArch R6 GSK, files 620 to 633; 702 to 709; copies posted in State Electronic Archive of Ukraine, https://tsdea.aewrchives.gov.ua/deutsch/.

Note 3: Eduard Allert (pseud), “The Lost Generation," in The Lost Generation and other Stories, edited by Gerhard Lohrenz, 9–128 (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1982), 30. Cf. fuller German original: Eduard [Abram] Reimer, unpublished memoir (n.d.), from Mennonite Heritage Archive, Gerhard Lohrenz Fonds, 60, no. 63, vol. 3333.

Note 4: Katie Friesen, Into the Unknown (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1986), 29.

Note 5: Victor Janzen, From the Dniepr to the Paraguay River (Winnipeg, MB: Self-published, 1995), 27.

Note 6: Helene Dueck, Durch Trübsal und Not (Winnipeg, MB: Centre for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 1995), 16f., https://archive.org/details/durch-truebsal-und-not/mode/2up.

Note 7: “Glück, Theo (Theodor),” MennLex V, https://www.mennlex.de/doku.php?id=art:glueck_theo.

Note 8: Theo Glück, “Bei den Mennoniten in der Ukraine. Aus einer Niederschrift im Jahre 1944,” Mennonitischer Gemeinde-Kalender (1956), 26–32, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Christlicher%20Gemeinde-Kalender/1951-1970/DSCF7522.JPG.

Note 9: Cf. Imanuel Baumann, “Die ‘Mennonitische Jugend-Rundbrief-Gemeinschaft’ und die nationalsozialistische ‘Machtergreifung,’” in Mennoniten in der NS-Zeit. Stimmen, Lebenssituationen, Erfahrungen, edited by Astrid von Schlachta, 90–107 (Bolanden-WLieierhof: Mennonitischer Geschichtsverein, 2017); for samples, see Mitteilungen des Mennonitischen Jugend-Rund-Briefes, Group 12, Round 2, from Mennonite Library and Archives- Bethel College, MS 165, box 48, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_165/box%2048%20Rundbriefe/.

Note 10: Karl Götz, Das Schwarzmeerdeutschtum: Die Mennoniten (Posen: NS-Druck Wartheland, 1944), 11f. From BA R 187/267a, Bundesarchiv Berlin; copies in multiple places, including https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1944 and https://chortitza.org/pdf/0v772.pdf. On Götz and the booklet (with translation), see Benjamin Goossen, “‘A Small World Power’: How the Nazi Regime Viewed Mennonites,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 92, no. 2 (2018), 173–206, https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/goossen/files/goossen_a_small_world_power_2018.pdf.

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Spiritual Snapshot of Liberated Mennonites in Ukraine: German Mennonite Theo Glück, 1943-43," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), June 11, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/06/spiritual-snapshot-of-liberated.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Swiss and Palatinate Connections

Sometime after 1850 Andreas Plennert and his family immigrated to South Russia from the Culm Region of West Prussia. Though there was at least one Mennonite “Plehnert” who had already immigrated to Russia in 1793, it is not a very common Prussian-Russian Mennonite name. As such, however, it is easier to trace than many and offers a minority narrative and identity within the longer and broader Russian Mennonite story. The account below is adapted largely from information in Horst Penner, Die ost- und westpreußischen Mennoniten , vol. 1, though I have expanded upon his work to offer a slightly different narrative. In 1724 there was a group of Mennonites forced out of the Memel region in East Prussia for political and religious reasons and were given assistance to resettle back to West Prussia in areas populated by Mennonites. Among the 23 households that went to the Stuhm region there is one Plenert listed, namely Christian Plenert. We know that Mennonites entered the Memel region ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Last Days of Mennonite Life on the Molotschna, September 1943

The Molotschna Mennonite Colony was established in 1803; 140 years later its villages were evacuated by retreating German armies. A map of the larger German operation of 1943 and the various "Trecks" is attached. The tens of thousands of evacuees included some 35,000 Mennonites. Nazi Germany had utterly failed Ukrainians, but continued to have plans for their "ethnic Germans" in the east. On Sept. 8, 1943 , the Red Army successfully took Donetsk (Stalino), 230 km east of Molotschna. The next day, S.S. administrators gave orders that every Molotschna family should load one wagon with their possessions and prepare for an orderly evacuation. Hitler was intent on holding Crimea, and sought to set up a defensive line from Zaporizhzhia to Melitopol and south to the Sea of Azov. Evacuation plans east of this line were in place since late June—initially to be resettled “somewhere” west of the Dnieper; on Aug. 17 first steps were taken to move 8,000 hospital beds west o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Shift from Dutch to German, 1700s

Already in 1671, Mennonite Flemish Elder Georg Hansen in Danzig published his German-language catechism ( Glaubens-Bericht für die Jugend ) as preparation for youth seeking baptism. Though educational competencies varied, Hansen’s Glaubens-Bericht assumed that youth preparing for baptism had a stronger ability to read complex German than Dutch ( note 1 ). Popular Mennonite preacher Jacob Denner (1659–1746), originally from the Hamburg-Altona Mennonite Church, lived in Danzig for four years in the early 1700s. A first volume of his Dutch sermons was published in 1706 in Danzig and Amsterdam, and then in 1730 and 1751 he published two German collections. Untrained preachers would often read Denner’s sermons: “Those who preached German—which all Prussian preachers around 1750 did, with the exception of the Danzig preachers—had no sermons books from their co-religionists other than this one by Jacob Denner” ( note 2 ). In Danzig and the Vistula Delta region there were some differences...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eugenics and Euthanasia: Russian Mennonites and the Third Reich

Little surprises me when I write about Russian Mennonites caught “between the devil and the deep blue sea.” A 1944 letter I found recently from Mennonite Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh however offers a new and disturbing snapshot of this leader and the Russian Mennonite community under the umbrella of the Third Reich ( note 1 ). It is not too much to say that this larger-than-life leader stands at the centre of almost every significant Russian Mennonite story between 1915 and 1945, including community decisions during the revolution, the formation of MCC, the emigration of 20,000 Russländer, the miracle release of thousands gathered at the gates of Moscow, 1929-30, the creation of the Paraguayan Fernheim Colony, famine relief in the 1930s, the Canadian debates about identity and worldview in Der Bote and the Rundschau papers, and almost everything that happened with Mennonites in Ukraine from 1941 to 1945. His importance for the Mennonite story cannot be understated. Even for many conte...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Danzig and Poland?

In the late 16th century, Poland became a haven for a variety of non-conformists which included Jews, Anti-Trinitarians from Italy and Bohemia, Quakers and Calvinists from Great Britain, south German Schwenkfelders, Eastern Orthodox, Armenian, and Greek Catholic Christians, some Muslim Tatars, as well as other peaceful sectarians like the Dutch and Flemish Anabaptists. Unlike the Low Countries and most of western Europe, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was a “state without stakes,” and as such fittingly described as “God’s playground” ( note 1 ). In the view of 17th-century Dutch dramatist Joost van den Vondel, it was “the ‘Promised Land,’ where the refugee could forget all his sorrow and enjoy the richness of the land” ( note 2 ). Over the next two centuries an important strand of Mennonite life and spirituality evolved into a mature tradition in this relatively hospitable context ( note 3 ). Anabaptists from the Low Countries began to arrive in Danzig and region as early as 15...
Post a Comment
Read more