Skip to main content

Vaccinations in Chortitza and Molotschna, beginning in 1804

Vaccination lists for Chortitza Mennonite children in 1809 and 1814 were published prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with little curiosity (note 1). However during the 2020-22 pandemic and in a context in which some refused to vaccinate for religious belief, the historic data took on new significance. Ancestors of some of the more conservative Russian Mennonite groups—like the Reinländer or the Bergthalers or the adult children of land delegate Jacob Höppner—were in fact vaccinating their infants and toddlers against small pox over two hundred years ago (note 2).

Also before the current pandemic Ukrainian historian Dmytro Myeshkov brought to light other archival materials on Mennonites and vaccination. The material below is my summary and translation of the relevant pages of Myeshkov’s massive 2008 volume on Black Sea German and their Worlds, 1781 to 1871 (German only; note 3).

Myeshkov confirms that Chortitza was already immunizing its children in 1804 when their District Office “reported an epidemic rampant among its children.” A nearby non-Mennonite German settlement (Joseftal) had 20 children die of smallpox that year. The newly arrived settlers in Molotschna in 1804 were also plagued by the same children’s disease, Myeshkov notes. Chortitza Mennonites in fact “begged” their government liaison, State Counsellor Contenius, for the cowpox vaccines. Smallpox is an acute, highly infectious often fatal disease; those exposed to cowpox are immune from smallpox.

Chortitza not only requested the vaccine, “but also instructions on how to vaccinate their children independently.” Both Chortitza and Molotschna settlers may have received information about the vaccines from officials at the Ekaterinoslav Medical Office, “who in 1804 often visited the resettlers housed in the town, and at the same time began to carry out vaccinations in the settlements of the governorate [e.g., Chortitza], beginning spring 1805. In March 1805, an official of the Medical Office named Becker was sent to Chortitza to carry out vaccinations and teach them how to administer the vaccinations.”

A few years later in 1808—on Contenius’ instructions—cowpox vaccines were administered in the German and Mennonite settlements along the Molotschna River. Some of it “had been obtained locally and some had been sent from Moscow.” An official by the name of Wannovius administered the vaccines. Soon thereafter a committee “for the dissemination of cowpox vaccination” was established in Ekaterinoslav, and the vaccination work among the colonists was done more systematically.

“Lists of children who had not yet received vaccinations had to be compiled in advance. Great importance was attached to education among the colonists, which was to highlight the benefits of the planned campaign.” Myeshkov cites one official who was convinced that "this saving remedy ... may be suitable not only to protect susceptible persons for all time from the mischief and cruelty of natural smallpox, but in time may also put a stop to its ravages altogether and to its most fatal traces among the people." The committee, Myeshkov shows, then thought it necessary and expedient to train colonists locally how to inoculate their own people with their own “inoculators".

Most interesting is a chart that Myeshkov inserts showing the progress of inoculation in the Molotschna Mennonite Colony in 1817. At the start of April 1817, 211 Molotschna Mennonite children were unvaccinated. Another 100 children were born between April 1 and December 31. Of these 311 children, 197 were vaccinated during this time. Twelve unvaccinated children died, and 102 children still remained unvaccinated.

This indicates some vaccine hesitancy in the colony though—as Myeshkov notes—“the available data indicate that the vaccination situation in the other [German, Swedish and Bulgarian] colonies was even worse than in the Molotschna.” If vaccinations were undertaken in an unsystematic way, it was “probably related to the availability of vaccine” he suggests, which had to be produced first.

“The hopes of the committee in Ekaterinoslav that the vaccine could be obtained locally from already vaccinated children were not fulfilled, because in the Molotschna colony, as in other colonies, the parents did not allow it.” That said, Colonial Physician Schulze “succeeded in keeping the number of unvaccinated children under control, partly because the vaccinations he administered were very rarely unsuccessful.”

Myeshkov’s footnotes direct the reader to the relevant primary documents that can help to reconstruct the life and times of Mennonites in a pandemic.

A Molotschna vaccination list from 1831 was also found in the twentieth century, recorded and subsequently lost (note 4). In the context of that 1831 cholera epidemic, Mennonite leader Johann Cornies wrote to his friend in Prussia, Johann Wiebe, on health measures and Mennonite attitudes towards fighting the epidemic: “We must … plead with [God] to turn this scourge away from our empire and our villages. With complete faith in the wisdom of our government, we await the Almighty’s ordinances without fear … whatever comes from God will serve our well-being.” (Note 5)

Myeshkov also has one reference to Jacob D. Epp’s diary, A Mennonite in Russia (note 6) which also has a number of personal references to vaccinations in Epp’s family in the 1850s.

In short, Russian Mennonites were gratefully vaccinating their children 217 years ago and most continued to ask the state for vaccines in the decades that followed.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

 ---Notes---

Note 1: See 1809 immunization list for the Chortitza Settlement, https://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/1809.htm, as well as the 1814 list: https://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/1814c.htm.

Note 2: For example, Reinländer Elder Johann J. Friesen (b.1869, #134092)--who took his people from Canada to Mexico in 1923, and his wife--both had ancestors who vaccinated their children in Chortitza in 1809 and 1814. See Friesen’s ancestors--Abraham Friesen (#158055) and Peter Dyck as well as his wife’s ancestors--Peter Martens (GRanDMA #486885) and Johann Harms (#107755). The same for Bergthal Elder Johann Funk’s mother—vaccinated by her parents (#196100), or landscout Jacob Höppner’s granddaughter, Maria Hildebrandt (#197316). On Johann Friesen, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Friesen%2C_Johann_J._(1869-1935).

Note 3: Dmytro Myeshkov, Die Schawarzmeerdeutschen und ihre Welten: 1781–1871 (Essen: Klartext, 2008). This is the source of the translated material above (pp. 168-171).

Note 4: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/a-mennonite-pandemic-spirituality-1830.html.

Note 5: No. 202, “Johann Cornies to Johann Wiebe, Tiege, West Prussia, December 30, 1830,” in Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe: Letters and Papers of Johann Cornies, vol. 1: 1812–1835, translated by Ingrid I. Epp; edited by Harvey L. Dyck, Ingrid I. Epp, and John R. Staples (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015), 205.

Note 6: A Mennonite in Russia: The Diaries of Jacob D. Epp, 1851–1880, translated and edited by Harvey L. Dyck (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013).

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Vaccinations in Chortitza and Molotschna, beginning 1804," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), May 29, 2023,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß";  note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...