Skip to main content

Mother’s Day Observation and the German Reich

Mother’s Day (Muttertag) was first mentioned in the international Mennonitische Rundschau in May 1912. By 1936, the Rundschau published a Mother’s Day poem by Hitler for its largely Canadian Mennonite readership (note 1). Five years later Mennonites in Ukraine were drawn into the cult-like veneration of the German mother.

With falling birth rates in Germany in the 1920s, National Socialism co-opted marriage and motherhood politically. Mother’s Day became a German national holiday in 1934, and any private family purposes of the day were subordinated to the political purposes of Party and nation:

“The German people will acknowledge their indebtedness to the racially pure, biologically sound and fecund German family (zur artreinen, erbgesunden und kinderreichen deutschen Familie) … and will accordingly observe the day as a day of honour to the German mother as the preserver and caregiver of a proud progeny (Hüterin und Pflegerin eines stolzen Nachwuchses). Our schoolchildren should understand the responsible task to which they are called as future bearers of a typical German family life, and learn again to honour the mothers of our people and serve them with gratitude.”—Decree for Mother’s Day Observance (Note 2)

In 1941 Germany invaded the USSR and occupied Ukraine. Some 35,000 Mennonites came under German authority. The mothers and children were explicitly introduced to the Nazified versions of motherhood and teachings in Party-controlled newspapers for ethnic Germans in Ukraine—basically, on women’s role in “protection against the decay of the people: care of race and heredity” (note 3).

Party members deployed in Ukraine organized celebrations in honour of ethnic German mothers. “On this occasion, the meaning and significance of the larger National Socialist community was explained to the ethnic German mothers. The mothers were presented with bouquets of flowers by members of the German youth in Ukraine,” according to the newspaper distributed in the Mennonite villages.

The same newspaper also summarized the official Mother’s Day national radio broadcasts from Berlin that year:

“The German woman in particular knows what Bolshevism means for the family, whose center and soul is the mother. ... After the victory the German woman and mother will be able to devote herself again to her original task. ... Beside those fighting on the front, nothing in a people is stronger than its mothers.” (Note 4)

At district and town celebrations of the German mother in Ukraine, a speaker would normally recite Hitler’s comments on the mother’s role in the German Reich for “up-building of the Volk” and the recovery of the nation:

“What the man gives in heroic-courage on the battlefield, the woman gives in eternally patient devotion, in eternally patient suffering and endurance. Every child that she brings into the world is a battle which she wages for the being or non-being of her Volk. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they recognize that each performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained.” (Note 5)


In September 1942, the regional weekly Deutsche Post [Ukraine] ran an article on the historical achievements of the German colonies in Ukraine and praised their “amazing racial-biological prowess” and for achieving the highest birth rates of all European peoples. They are “perhaps the strongest and clearest proof of the inexhaustible power of German racial ethnicity which, even detached from the actual mother soil, again and again renewed itself from itself” (note 6).

In predominantly Mennonite Molotschna settlement area no one was made more famous than the 84-year-old Mennonite midwife “Mutter Berg” (Helene Berg). During the visit of Reichsführer-SS Himmler to Halbstadt October 31 to November 1, 1942, Mother Berg was honoured for helping birth some 8,000 ethnic German babies over a lifetime—the midwife and mother of a people! She had opportunity to give hospitality in her home to high-ranking Nazi officials—including SS Obersturmführer Dr. Gerhard Wolfrum (note 7)—and was given a small cameo appearance in a German propaganda film of the Halbstadt area (note 8). Over the next two years, Wolfrum “emphatically” sought to honour her with a secure retirement and through her honour the Black Sea German Mennonites on behalf of the Reichsführer-SS (note 9).

The ostensibly conservative concept of motherhood placed a woman’s highest call in connection to the “motherhood of the people,” that is, above the parenthood of their real, living children. Hand-in-hand with this cult of German motherhood was the growth of eugenic counselling, i.e., the sterilization or killing of those determined to have heritable diseases or “deficiencies” or deformities. Individuals with some of these conditions are noted in Stumpp’s village reports for easy identification and remedial action (note 10). Mennonite physician Dr. Johann J. Klassen of Muntau (Halbstadt) was accused after the war of supporting the liquidation of handicapped children and adults in Orloff, November 1941 (note 11). At the district School for the Deaf in Tiege, near Orloff, a memorial stands today for 131 deaf and mute children who were killed by the Nazis (note 12).

The confusion came not only from official propaganda, but from the new church contacts as well. Mennonite pastors from the Reich also spoke of “racial contamination,” “healthy breeding” (note 13) and of the threats of self-centred, Volk-destructive individualism to a woman’s “highest and holiest determination” (note 14).

After Mennonites and other Black Sea Germans were evacuated from Ukraine in 1943 and planted in German-annexed Poland in 1944, my grandmother Helene Thiessen Bräul was “honoured” at a public event recognizing mothers—in her case for the number of sons she had in the army. She was presented with a large portrait of Hitler. She embodied the pragmatic Nazi view of a Volksdeutsche-woman: a sturdy peasant who bore many strong children, kept the race pure and worked the land. But Helene and her generation were not easily excitable about honours, though she was anxious of the consequences of not hanging up the portrait. She told her daughters “I do not want that portrait; I just want our boys back.” At least that’s how my mother tells the story.

My grandmother was caught up in a worldview not of her own making. She like so many other Mennonite mothers was primarily concerned about two things: the survival of her children, and repatriation and not falling back again into the hands of Stalin.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pic: Advertisement for Mother's Day event, Deutsche Bug-Zeitung [Ukraine] 2, no. 43 (May 15, 1943), 4, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/1/.

Note 1: Mennonitische Rundschau 35, no. 19 (May 8 1912), 2, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1912-05-08_35_19/page/n1/mode/2up; also vol. 59, no. 50 (December 9, 1936), 11, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1936-12-09_59_50/page/n11/.

Note 2: Bernhard Rust, Reich Minister for Science, Art and National Education, “Gedenk- und Ehrentag der Deutschen Mütter,” Zentralblatt für die gesamte Unterrichtsverwaltung in Preußen, no. 8, April 1934; cf. also Adolf Hitler, “Die völkische Sendung der Frau,” in N.S. Frauenbuch, edited by Ellen Semmelroth and Renata von Stieda (Munich: Lehmanns, 1934), 11, https://archive.org/details/SemmelrothEllenUndStiedaRenateVonN.S.Frauenbuch1934287S.ScanFraktur/page/n9/mode/2up.

Note 3: “Schutz vor Volkszerfall: Rassen- und Erbpflege,” Ukraine Post, no. 6 (February 27, 1943), 4, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/878/.

Note 4: Deutsche Ukraine-Zeitung 2, no. 114 (May 18, 1943), 2, 3, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/875/Deutsche Bug-Zeitung 2, no. 46 (June 12, 1943), 3, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/1/.

Note 5: Hitler, “Die völkische Sendung der Frau,” 11.

Note 6: “Deutsche Leistung in der Ukraine,” Ukraine Post 1, no. 11 (September 26, 1942), 3f., 

Note 7: Cf. Benjamin H. Unruh to Hans Epp [former Chortitza district mayor], December 5, 1943, Vereinigung Collection 1943, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof (MFW); Benjamin H. Unruh to Gustav Reimer, December 5, 1943; and Benjamin H. Unruh to Emil Händiges, November 18, 1943; Vereinigung Collection 1943, MFW.

Note 8: See archival video footage of Helene Berg at Halbstadt in the summer of 1943, http://www.archiv-akh.de/filme?utf-8=%E2%9C%93&q=halbstadt#1.

Note 9: Gustav Reimer to Benjamin H. Unruh, December 20, 1943, Vereinigung Collection 1943, MFW Cf. also Unruh to Epp, December 5, 1943.

Note 10: Maria Fiebrandt, Auslese für die Siedlergesellschaft. Die Einbeziehung Volksdeutscher in die NS-Erbgesundheitspolitik im Kontext der Umsiedlungen 1939–1945 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2014), 51. The “Neu-Chortitza Dorfbericht,” 261, May 1942, in “Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp,” Bundesarchiv R6/623, file 184, singles out a Braun family for “marriage among relatives” and where “all three children are intellectually disabled (Idioten).” Nothing is noted about their fate, https://tsdea.archives.gov.ua/deutsch/gallery.php?tt=R_6_623+Rayon%3A+Sofijevka%0D%0AKreisgebiet%3A+Pjatichatki%0D%0AGenerelbezirk%3A+Dnjepropetrowsk+Dorf%3A+Neu-Chortitza%0D%0Arussisch+%E2%80%93+Nowo-Chortitza+&p=R_6_623%5C%D1%823_510-593%0D%0A#lg=1&slide=21. Similarly a son of Peter Martens in “Gnadental (Rayon Sofiewka) Dorfbericht,” May 1942,” Familienverzeichnis, 480, “Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp,” BArch R6/623, Mappe 182, https://tsdea.archives.gov.ua/deutsch/gallery.php?tt=R_6_623+Gebiet%3A+Zwischen%0D%0ARayon%3A+Sofievka%0D%0A%5BKreisgebiet%3A+Dnjepropetrowsk%0D%0AKreisgebiet%3A+Pjatichatki%5D%0D%0AGenerelbezirk%3A+Dnjepropetrowsk+Dorf%3A+Gnadental%0D%0Arussisch+%E2%80%93+Wodjanaja&p=R_6_623%5C%D1%824_945-1037%0D%0A#lg=1&slide=22.

Note 11: Cf. Dmytro Myeshkov, “Mennonites in Ukraine before, during, and immediately after the Second World War,” in European Mennonites and the Holocaust, edited by Mark Jantzen and John D. Thiesen (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020), 217.

Note 12: After the war, the local townspeople erected a memorial to those who died at the school (Eva Chamberlain Martens, email communication with author, May 20, 2019). When the Nazis arrived at this school, students “were marched to the field behind the school and shot.”

Note 13: Cf. Krefeld Pastor Gustav Kraemer, Wir und unsere Volksgemeinschaft, 1938. Lecture delivered in Heubuden, West Prussia, January 25, 1938 (Krefeld: Consistorium der Mennonitengemeinde Krefeld, 1938), 8, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1938,%20Kraemer%20Wir%20und%20unsere%20Volksgemeinschaft/.

Note 13: Horst Quiring, Grundworte des Glaubens. Achtzig wichtige biblische Begriffe für den Menschen der Gegenwart dargestellt (Berlin: Furche, 1938), 58, 147, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1938,%20Quiring,%20Grundworte%20des%20Glaubens/, 58, 147. This is consistent with themes repeated in the press and in official speeches on “German Women.”

For further reading:

Blackburn, Gilmer W. Education in the Third Reich: A Study of Race and History in Nazi Textbooks. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985.

Koonz, Claudia. Mothers in the Fatherland: Women, the Family and Nazi Politics. London: Routledge, 2013.

Mouton, Michelle. From Nurturing the Nation to Purifying the Volk: Weimar and Nazi Family Policy, 1918-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Stephenson, Jill. The Nazi Organisation of Women. London: Routledge, 2013.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Mother's Day Observation and the German Reich," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), May 25, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/mothers-day-observation-and-german-reich.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The End of Schardau (and other Molotschna villages), 1941

My grandmother was four-years old when her parents moved from Petershagen, Molotschna to Schardau in 1908. This story is larger than that of Schardau, but tells how this village and many others in Molotschna were evacuated by Stalin days before the arrival of German troops in 1941. -ANF The bridge across the Dnieper at Chortitza was destroyed by retreating Soviet troops on August 18, 1941 and the hydroelectric dam completed near Einlage in 1932 was also dynamited by NKVD personnel—killing at least 20,000 locals downstream, and forcing the Germans to cross further south at Nikopol. For the next six-and-a-half weeks, the old Mennonite settlement area of Chortitza was continuously shelled by Soviet troops from Zaporozhje on the east side of the river ( note 1 ). The majority of Russian Germans in Crimea and Ukraine paid dearly for Germany’s Blitzkrieg and plans for racially-based population resettlements. As early as August 3, 1941, the Supreme Command of the Soviet Forces received noti...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...