Skip to main content

Mother’s Day Observation and the German Reich

Mother’s Day (Muttertag) was first mentioned in the international Mennonitische Rundschau in May 1912. By 1936, the Rundschau published a Mother’s Day poem by Hitler for its largely Canadian Mennonite readership (note 1). Five years later Mennonites in Ukraine were drawn into the cult-like veneration of the German mother.

With falling birth rates in Germany in the 1920s, National Socialism co-opted marriage and motherhood politically. Mother’s Day became a German national holiday in 1934, and any private family purposes of the day were subordinated to the political purposes of Party and nation:

“The German people will acknowledge their indebtedness to the racially pure, biologically sound and fecund German family (zur artreinen, erbgesunden und kinderreichen deutschen Familie) … and will accordingly observe the day as a day of honour to the German mother as the preserver and caregiver of a proud progeny (Hüterin und Pflegerin eines stolzen Nachwuchses). Our schoolchildren should understand the responsible task to which they are called as future bearers of a typical German family life, and learn again to honour the mothers of our people and serve them with gratitude.”—Decree for Mother’s Day Observance (Note 2)

In 1941 Germany invaded the USSR and occupied Ukraine. Some 35,000 Mennonites came under German authority. The mothers and children were explicitly introduced to the Nazified versions of motherhood and teachings in Party-controlled newspapers for ethnic Germans in Ukraine—basically, on women’s role in “protection against the decay of the people: care of race and heredity” (note 3).

Party members deployed in Ukraine organized celebrations in honour of ethnic German mothers. “On this occasion, the meaning and significance of the larger National Socialist community was explained to the ethnic German mothers. The mothers were presented with bouquets of flowers by members of the German youth in Ukraine,” according to the newspaper distributed in the Mennonite villages.

The same newspaper also summarized the official Mother’s Day national radio broadcasts from Berlin that year:

“The German woman in particular knows what Bolshevism means for the family, whose center and soul is the mother. ... After the victory the German woman and mother will be able to devote herself again to her original task. ... Beside those fighting on the front, nothing in a people is stronger than its mothers.” (Note 4)

At district and town celebrations of the German mother in Ukraine, a speaker would normally recite Hitler’s comments on the mother’s role in the German Reich for “up-building of the Volk” and the recovery of the nation:

“What the man gives in heroic-courage on the battlefield, the woman gives in eternally patient devotion, in eternally patient suffering and endurance. Every child that she brings into the world is a battle which she wages for the being or non-being of her Volk. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they recognize that each performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained.” (Note 5)


In September 1942, the regional weekly Deutsche Post [Ukraine] ran an article on the historical achievements of the German colonies in Ukraine and praised their “amazing racial-biological prowess” and for achieving the highest birth rates of all European peoples. They are “perhaps the strongest and clearest proof of the inexhaustible power of German racial ethnicity which, even detached from the actual mother soil, again and again renewed itself from itself” (note 6).

In predominantly Mennonite Molotschna settlement area no one was made more famous than the 84-year-old Mennonite midwife “Mutter Berg” (Helene Berg). During the visit of Reichsführer-SS Himmler to Halbstadt October 31 to November 1, 1942, Mother Berg was honoured for helping birth some 8,000 ethnic German babies over a lifetime—the midwife and mother of a people! She had opportunity to give hospitality in her home to high-ranking Nazi officials—including SS Obersturmführer Dr. Gerhard Wolfrum (note 7)—and was given a small cameo appearance in a German propaganda film of the Halbstadt area (note 8). Over the next two years, Wolfrum “emphatically” sought to honour her with a secure retirement and through her honour the Black Sea German Mennonites on behalf of the Reichsführer-SS (note 9).

The ostensibly conservative concept of motherhood placed a woman’s highest call in connection to the “motherhood of the people,” that is, above the parenthood of their real, living children. Hand-in-hand with this cult of German motherhood was the growth of eugenic counselling, i.e., the sterilization or killing of those determined to have heritable diseases or “deficiencies” or deformities. Individuals with some of these conditions are noted in Stumpp’s village reports for easy identification and remedial action (note 10). Mennonite physician Dr. Johann J. Klassen of Muntau (Halbstadt) was accused after the war of supporting the liquidation of handicapped children and adults in Orloff, November 1941 (note 11). At the district School for the Deaf in Tiege, near Orloff, a memorial stands today for 131 deaf and mute children who were killed by the Nazis (note 12).

The confusion came not only from official propaganda, but from the new church contacts as well. Mennonite pastors from the Reich also spoke of “racial contamination,” “healthy breeding” (note 13) and of the threats of self-centred, Volk-destructive individualism to a woman’s “highest and holiest determination” (note 14).

After Mennonites and other Black Sea Germans were evacuated from Ukraine in 1943 and planted in German-annexed Poland in 1944, my grandmother Helene Thiessen Bräul was “honoured” at a public event recognizing mothers—in her case for the number of sons she had in the army. She was presented with a large portrait of Hitler. She embodied the pragmatic Nazi view of a Volksdeutsche-woman: a sturdy peasant who bore many strong children, kept the race pure and worked the land. But Helene and her generation were not easily excitable about honours, though she was anxious of the consequences of not hanging up the portrait. She told her daughters “I do not want that portrait; I just want our boys back.” At least that’s how my mother tells the story.

My grandmother was caught up in a worldview not of her own making. She like so many other Mennonite mothers was primarily concerned about two things: the survival of her children, and repatriation and not falling back again into the hands of Stalin.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pic: Advertisement for Mother's Day event, Deutsche Bug-Zeitung [Ukraine] 2, no. 43 (May 15, 1943), 4, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/1/.

Note 1: Mennonitische Rundschau 35, no. 19 (May 8 1912), 2, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1912-05-08_35_19/page/n1/mode/2up; also vol. 59, no. 50 (December 9, 1936), 11, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1936-12-09_59_50/page/n11/.

Note 2: Bernhard Rust, Reich Minister for Science, Art and National Education, “Gedenk- und Ehrentag der Deutschen Mütter,” Zentralblatt für die gesamte Unterrichtsverwaltung in Preußen, no. 8, April 1934; cf. also Adolf Hitler, “Die völkische Sendung der Frau,” in N.S. Frauenbuch, edited by Ellen Semmelroth and Renata von Stieda (Munich: Lehmanns, 1934), 11, https://archive.org/details/SemmelrothEllenUndStiedaRenateVonN.S.Frauenbuch1934287S.ScanFraktur/page/n9/mode/2up.

Note 3: “Schutz vor Volkszerfall: Rassen- und Erbpflege,” Ukraine Post, no. 6 (February 27, 1943), 4, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/878/.

Note 4: Deutsche Ukraine-Zeitung 2, no. 114 (May 18, 1943), 2, 3, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/875/Deutsche Bug-Zeitung 2, no. 46 (June 12, 1943), 3, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/1/.

Note 5: Hitler, “Die völkische Sendung der Frau,” 11.

Note 6: “Deutsche Leistung in der Ukraine,” Ukraine Post 1, no. 11 (September 26, 1942), 3f., 

Note 7: Cf. Benjamin H. Unruh to Hans Epp [former Chortitza district mayor], December 5, 1943, Vereinigung Collection 1943, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof (MFW); Benjamin H. Unruh to Gustav Reimer, December 5, 1943; and Benjamin H. Unruh to Emil Händiges, November 18, 1943; Vereinigung Collection 1943, MFW.

Note 8: See archival video footage of Helene Berg at Halbstadt in the summer of 1943, http://www.archiv-akh.de/filme?utf-8=%E2%9C%93&q=halbstadt#1.

Note 9: Gustav Reimer to Benjamin H. Unruh, December 20, 1943, Vereinigung Collection 1943, MFW Cf. also Unruh to Epp, December 5, 1943.

Note 10: Maria Fiebrandt, Auslese für die Siedlergesellschaft. Die Einbeziehung Volksdeutscher in die NS-Erbgesundheitspolitik im Kontext der Umsiedlungen 1939–1945 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2014), 51. The “Neu-Chortitza Dorfbericht,” 261, May 1942, in “Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp,” Bundesarchiv R6/623, file 184, singles out a Braun family for “marriage among relatives” and where “all three children are intellectually disabled (Idioten).” Nothing is noted about their fate, https://tsdea.archives.gov.ua/deutsch/gallery.php?tt=R_6_623+Rayon%3A+Sofijevka%0D%0AKreisgebiet%3A+Pjatichatki%0D%0AGenerelbezirk%3A+Dnjepropetrowsk+Dorf%3A+Neu-Chortitza%0D%0Arussisch+%E2%80%93+Nowo-Chortitza+&p=R_6_623%5C%D1%823_510-593%0D%0A#lg=1&slide=21. Similarly a son of Peter Martens in “Gnadental (Rayon Sofiewka) Dorfbericht,” May 1942,” Familienverzeichnis, 480, “Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp,” BArch R6/623, Mappe 182, https://tsdea.archives.gov.ua/deutsch/gallery.php?tt=R_6_623+Gebiet%3A+Zwischen%0D%0ARayon%3A+Sofievka%0D%0A%5BKreisgebiet%3A+Dnjepropetrowsk%0D%0AKreisgebiet%3A+Pjatichatki%5D%0D%0AGenerelbezirk%3A+Dnjepropetrowsk+Dorf%3A+Gnadental%0D%0Arussisch+%E2%80%93+Wodjanaja&p=R_6_623%5C%D1%824_945-1037%0D%0A#lg=1&slide=22.

Note 11: Cf. Dmytro Myeshkov, “Mennonites in Ukraine before, during, and immediately after the Second World War,” in European Mennonites and the Holocaust, edited by Mark Jantzen and John D. Thiesen (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020), 217.

Note 12: After the war, the local townspeople erected a memorial to those who died at the school (Eva Chamberlain Martens, email communication with author, May 20, 2019). When the Nazis arrived at this school, students “were marched to the field behind the school and shot.”

Note 13: Cf. Krefeld Pastor Gustav Kraemer, Wir und unsere Volksgemeinschaft, 1938. Lecture delivered in Heubuden, West Prussia, January 25, 1938 (Krefeld: Consistorium der Mennonitengemeinde Krefeld, 1938), 8, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1938,%20Kraemer%20Wir%20und%20unsere%20Volksgemeinschaft/.

Note 13: Horst Quiring, Grundworte des Glaubens. Achtzig wichtige biblische Begriffe für den Menschen der Gegenwart dargestellt (Berlin: Furche, 1938), 58, 147, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1938,%20Quiring,%20Grundworte%20des%20Glaubens/, 58, 147. This is consistent with themes repeated in the press and in official speeches on “German Women.”

For further reading:

Blackburn, Gilmer W. Education in the Third Reich: A Study of Race and History in Nazi Textbooks. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985.

Koonz, Claudia. Mothers in the Fatherland: Women, the Family and Nazi Politics. London: Routledge, 2013.

Mouton, Michelle. From Nurturing the Nation to Purifying the Volk: Weimar and Nazi Family Policy, 1918-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Stephenson, Jill. The Nazi Organisation of Women. London: Routledge, 2013.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Mother's Day Observation and the German Reich," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), May 25, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/mothers-day-observation-and-german-reich.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

"They are useful to the state." An almost forgotten Prussian view of Mennonites, ca. 1780s-90s

In 1787 Mennonite interest for emigration was extremely strong outside the quasi independent City of Danzig in the Prussian annexed Marienwerder and Elbing regions. Even before the land scouts Johann Bartsch and Jacob Höppner had returned from Russia later that year, so many Mennonite exit applications had flooded offices that officials wrote Berlin in August 1787 for direction ( note 1a ). Initially officials did not see a problem: because Mennonites do not provide soldiers, the cantons lose nothing by their departure, and in fact benefit from the ten-percent tax imposed on financial assets leaving the state.  Ludwig von Baczko (1756-1823), Professor of History at the Artillery Academy in Königsberg, East Prussia, was the general editor of a series that included a travelogue through Prussia written by a certain Karl Ephraim Nanke. Nanke had no special love for Mennonites, but was generally balanced in his judgements and based his now almost forgotten account of Mennonites on perso...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

German Village on the Dnieper: Occupation Propaganda Photos. Chortitza, 1943

The following propaganda photos are of the Mennonites community in Chortitz, Ukraine during German occupation in World War II. German armies reached the Mennonite villages on the west bank of the Dnieper River on August 17, 1941. The photos below were taken almost two years later. However the war was already turning, and within two months the trek out of Ukraine would begin. The photographs are accompanied by an article about the Low-German speakers of Chortitza for a readership in the Reich ( note 1 ). The author repeatedly draws on the myth of one-sided German pioneer accomplishments abroad: “The first settlers found the land desolate and empty,” the reader is told, and were “left to fend for themselves in a foreign environment” where with German diligence, order and cleanliness they thrived. The article correctly recognizes the great losses of the ethnic Germans under Bolshevism--as if to convince readers that the war is a shared burden of all Germans, and which is now payin...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...

Molotschna: The final months, Summer 1943

These photos are from German propaganda material filmed in Molotschna (called "Halbstadt") in 1943—just a few months before the evacuation from Ukraine and trek to German-annexed Poland (Warthegau). Not all of the film is of the Mennonite settlement, however, but much of it is. Below are some frames from the film. The edited shorter version is of higher quality and designed as propaganda to be consumed by Germans in the Reich and to secure their approval .  The scenes are marked by cleanliness, orderliness and discipline. There is economic activity, a model Kindergarten, and always happy ethnic German people in the newly occupied territories. A predominantly Mennonite Cavalry Regiment (Waffen-SS) guarding Ukrainian and Russian workers is also highlighted. This hard to see and disturbing. Anything that may have been good here for Mennonites meant enslavement, hunger and death for untold numbers of others. Two versions of the film are available: Shorter (edited for l...

Nazi German love for Mennonites in Ukraine. Why?

For Mennonites the dramatic and massive invasion of USSR by German forces in Summer/Fall 1941 meant liberation from Soviet state terror and answer to prayer. Nazi Germany spared neither money nor personnel to free, feed, cloth, protect, heal and educate the Soviet Union’s ethnic Germans—and Mennonites in particular. Mennonite memoirs, village reports and EWZ (naturalization applications) autobiographies are consistent with praise for the German Reich and its leader. From the highest levels, goodwill, care and patience towards ethnic Germans was policy. Reichsführer -SS Heinrich Himmler was also named by Hitler as Reich Commissioner for the Consolidation of German Nationhood . This authorized Himmler and his para-military SS to oversee and coordinate the Germanization, resettlements and population transfers which came with the invasion and partial annexation of Poland (Warthegau), and later occupation plans for parts of Ukraine and Russia. The VoMi ( Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle )...