Skip to main content

Mother’s Day Observation and the German Reich

Mother’s Day (Muttertag) was first mentioned in the international Mennonitische Rundschau in May 1912. By 1936, the Rundschau published a Mother’s Day poem by Hitler for its largely Canadian Mennonite readership (note 1). Five years later Mennonites in Ukraine were drawn into the cult-like veneration of the German mother.

With falling birth rates in Germany in the 1920s, National Socialism co-opted marriage and motherhood politically. Mother’s Day became a German national holiday in 1934, and any private family purposes of the day were subordinated to the political purposes of Party and nation:

“The German people will acknowledge their indebtedness to the racially pure, biologically sound and fecund German family (zur artreinen, erbgesunden und kinderreichen deutschen Familie) … and will accordingly observe the day as a day of honour to the German mother as the preserver and caregiver of a proud progeny (Hüterin und Pflegerin eines stolzen Nachwuchses). Our schoolchildren should understand the responsible task to which they are called as future bearers of a typical German family life, and learn again to honour the mothers of our people and serve them with gratitude.”—Decree for Mother’s Day Observance (Note 2)

In 1941 Germany invaded the USSR and occupied Ukraine. Some 35,000 Mennonites came under German authority. The mothers and children were explicitly introduced to the Nazified versions of motherhood and teachings in Party-controlled newspapers for ethnic Germans in Ukraine—basically, on women’s role in “protection against the decay of the people: care of race and heredity” (note 3).

Party members deployed in Ukraine organized celebrations in honour of ethnic German mothers. “On this occasion, the meaning and significance of the larger National Socialist community was explained to the ethnic German mothers. The mothers were presented with bouquets of flowers by members of the German youth in Ukraine,” according to the newspaper distributed in the Mennonite villages.

The same newspaper also summarized the official Mother’s Day national radio broadcasts from Berlin that year:

“The German woman in particular knows what Bolshevism means for the family, whose center and soul is the mother. ... After the victory the German woman and mother will be able to devote herself again to her original task. ... Beside those fighting on the front, nothing in a people is stronger than its mothers.” (Note 4)

At district and town celebrations of the German mother in Ukraine, a speaker would normally recite Hitler’s comments on the mother’s role in the German Reich for “up-building of the Volk” and the recovery of the nation:

“What the man gives in heroic-courage on the battlefield, the woman gives in eternally patient devotion, in eternally patient suffering and endurance. Every child that she brings into the world is a battle which she wages for the being or non-being of her Volk. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they recognize that each performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained.” (Note 5)


In September 1942, the regional weekly Deutsche Post [Ukraine] ran an article on the historical achievements of the German colonies in Ukraine and praised their “amazing racial-biological prowess” and for achieving the highest birth rates of all European peoples. They are “perhaps the strongest and clearest proof of the inexhaustible power of German racial ethnicity which, even detached from the actual mother soil, again and again renewed itself from itself” (note 6).

In predominantly Mennonite Molotschna settlement area no one was made more famous than the 84-year-old Mennonite midwife “Mutter Berg” (Helene Berg). During the visit of Reichsführer-SS Himmler to Halbstadt October 31 to November 1, 1942, Mother Berg was honoured for helping birth some 8,000 ethnic German babies over a lifetime—the midwife and mother of a people! She had opportunity to give hospitality in her home to high-ranking Nazi officials—including SS Obersturmführer Dr. Gerhard Wolfrum (note 7)—and was given a small cameo appearance in a German propaganda film of the Halbstadt area (note 8). Over the next two years, Wolfrum “emphatically” sought to honour her with a secure retirement and through her honour the Black Sea German Mennonites on behalf of the Reichsführer-SS (note 9).

The ostensibly conservative concept of motherhood placed a woman’s highest call in connection to the “motherhood of the people,” that is, above the parenthood of their real, living children. Hand-in-hand with this cult of German motherhood was the growth of eugenic counselling, i.e., the sterilization or killing of those determined to have heritable diseases or “deficiencies” or deformities. Individuals with some of these conditions are noted in Stumpp’s village reports for easy identification and remedial action (note 10). Mennonite physician Dr. Johann J. Klassen of Muntau (Halbstadt) was accused after the war of supporting the liquidation of handicapped children and adults in Orloff, November 1941 (note 11). At the district School for the Deaf in Tiege, near Orloff, a memorial stands today for 131 deaf and mute children who were killed by the Nazis (note 12).

The confusion came not only from official propaganda, but from the new church contacts as well. Mennonite pastors from the Reich also spoke of “racial contamination,” “healthy breeding” (note 13) and of the threats of self-centred, Volk-destructive individualism to a woman’s “highest and holiest determination” (note 14).

After Mennonites and other Black Sea Germans were evacuated from Ukraine in 1943 and planted in German-annexed Poland in 1944, my grandmother Helene Thiessen Bräul was “honoured” at a public event recognizing mothers—in her case for the number of sons she had in the army. She was presented with a large portrait of Hitler. She embodied the pragmatic Nazi view of a Volksdeutsche-woman: a sturdy peasant who bore many strong children, kept the race pure and worked the land. But Helene and her generation were not easily excitable about honours, though she was anxious of the consequences of not hanging up the portrait. She told her daughters “I do not want that portrait; I just want our boys back.” At least that’s how my mother tells the story.

My grandmother was caught up in a worldview not of her own making. She like so many other Mennonite mothers was primarily concerned about two things: the survival of her children, and repatriation and not falling back again into the hands of Stalin.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pic: Advertisement for Mother's Day event, Deutsche Bug-Zeitung [Ukraine] 2, no. 43 (May 15, 1943), 4, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/1/.

Note 1: Mennonitische Rundschau 35, no. 19 (May 8 1912), 2, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1912-05-08_35_19/page/n1/mode/2up; also vol. 59, no. 50 (December 9, 1936), 11, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1936-12-09_59_50/page/n11/.

Note 2: Bernhard Rust, Reich Minister for Science, Art and National Education, “Gedenk- und Ehrentag der Deutschen Mütter,” Zentralblatt für die gesamte Unterrichtsverwaltung in Preußen, no. 8, April 1934; cf. also Adolf Hitler, “Die völkische Sendung der Frau,” in N.S. Frauenbuch, edited by Ellen Semmelroth and Renata von Stieda (Munich: Lehmanns, 1934), 11, https://archive.org/details/SemmelrothEllenUndStiedaRenateVonN.S.Frauenbuch1934287S.ScanFraktur/page/n9/mode/2up.

Note 3: “Schutz vor Volkszerfall: Rassen- und Erbpflege,” Ukraine Post, no. 6 (February 27, 1943), 4, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/878/.

Note 4: Deutsche Ukraine-Zeitung 2, no. 114 (May 18, 1943), 2, 3, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/875/; Deutsche Bug-Zeitung 2, no. 46 (June 12, 1943), 3, https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/1/.

Note 5: Hitler, “Die völkische Sendung der Frau,” 11.

Note 6: “Deutsche Leistung in der Ukraine,” Ukraine Post 1, no. 11 (September 26, 1942), 3f., 

Note 7: Cf. Benjamin H. Unruh to Hans Epp [former Chortitza district mayor], December 5, 1943, Vereinigung Collection 1943, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof (MFW); Benjamin H. Unruh to Gustav Reimer, December 5, 1943; and Benjamin H. Unruh to Emil Händiges, November 18, 1943; Vereinigung Collection 1943, MFW.

Note 8: See archival video footage of Helene Berg at Halbstadt in the summer of 1943, http://www.archiv-akh.de/filme?utf-8=%E2%9C%93&q=halbstadt#1.

Note 9: Gustav Reimer to Benjamin H. Unruh, December 20, 1943, Vereinigung Collection 1943, MFW Cf. also Unruh to Epp, December 5, 1943.

Note 10: Maria Fiebrandt, Auslese für die Siedlergesellschaft. Die Einbeziehung Volksdeutscher in die NS-Erbgesundheitspolitik im Kontext der Umsiedlungen 1939–1945 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2014), 51. The “Neu-Chortitza Dorfbericht,” 261, May 1942, in “Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp,” Bundesarchiv R6/623, file 184, singles out a Braun family for “marriage among relatives” and where “all three children are intellectually disabled (Idioten).” Nothing is noted about their fate, https://tsdea.archives.gov.ua/deutsch/gallery.php?tt=R_6_623+Rayon%3A+Sofijevka%0D%0AKreisgebiet%3A+Pjatichatki%0D%0AGenerelbezirk%3A+Dnjepropetrowsk+Dorf%3A+Neu-Chortitza%0D%0Arussisch+%E2%80%93+Nowo-Chortitza+&p=R_6_623%5C%D1%823_510-593%0D%0A#lg=1&slide=21. Similarly a son of Peter Martens in “Gnadental (Rayon Sofiewka) Dorfbericht,” May 1942,” Familienverzeichnis, 480, “Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp,” BArch R6/623, Mappe 182, https://tsdea.archives.gov.ua/deutsch/gallery.php?tt=R_6_623+Gebiet%3A+Zwischen%0D%0ARayon%3A+Sofievka%0D%0A%5BKreisgebiet%3A+Dnjepropetrowsk%0D%0AKreisgebiet%3A+Pjatichatki%5D%0D%0AGenerelbezirk%3A+Dnjepropetrowsk+Dorf%3A+Gnadental%0D%0Arussisch+%E2%80%93+Wodjanaja&p=R_6_623%5C%D1%824_945-1037%0D%0A#lg=1&slide=22.

Note 11: Cf. Dmytro Myeshkov, “Mennonites in Ukraine before, during, and immediately after the Second World War,” in European Mennonites and the Holocaust, edited by Mark Jantzen and John D. Thiesen (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020), 217.

Note 12: After the war, the local townspeople erected a memorial to those who died at the school (Eva Chamberlain Martens, email communication with author, May 20, 2019). When the Nazis arrived at this school, students “were marched to the field behind the school and shot.”

Note 13: Cf. Krefeld Pastor Gustav Kraemer, Wir und unsere Volksgemeinschaft, 1938. Lecture delivered in Heubuden, West Prussia, January 25, 1938 (Krefeld: Consistorium der Mennonitengemeinde Krefeld, 1938), 8, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1938,%20Kraemer%20Wir%20und%20unsere%20Volksgemeinschaft/.

Note 13: Horst Quiring, Grundworte des Glaubens. Achtzig wichtige biblische Begriffe für den Menschen der Gegenwart dargestellt (Berlin: Furche, 1938), 58, 147, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1938,%20Quiring,%20Grundworte%20des%20Glaubens/, 58, 147. This is consistent with themes repeated in the press and in official speeches on “German Women.”

For further reading:

Blackburn, Gilmer W. Education in the Third Reich: A Study of Race and History in Nazi Textbooks. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985.

Koonz, Claudia. Mothers in the Fatherland: Women, the Family and Nazi Politics. London: Routledge, 2013.

Mouton, Michelle. From Nurturing the Nation to Purifying the Volk: Weimar and Nazi Family Policy, 1918-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Stephenson, Jill. The Nazi Organisation of Women. London: Routledge, 2013.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Mother's Day Observation and the German Reich," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), May 25, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/mothers-day-observation-and-german-reich.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the
Post a Comment
Read more

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate
Post a Comment
Read more

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,
Post a Comment
Read more

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t
Post a Comment
Read more

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups
Post a Comment
Read more

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent
1 comment
Read more

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans
Post a Comment
Read more

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C
Post a Comment
Read more