Skip to main content

"Russian Empire Building" and the Mennonite Experience in Russia/Ukraine

Recently a friend asked: “Based on their long historical sojourn in Russia / Ukraine, what light can Mennonites shed on Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine today?” (February 2022).

The story of so-called Russian Mennonites began in the 1780s, was defined by Greater Russia’s imperial expansion, and was almost extinguished under Stalin and his fear of rising Ukraine nationalism and minority ethnic resistance in the 1930s.

Below are a few historical learnings based on that lived experience in Ukraine, formerly known as “New Russia” or “South Russia.” A short history of Russian “empire building” from the Mennonite experience might best begin with a brief reference to German Prussia in the 18th century, where Mennonites were at home. By the 1780s, further land acquisitions or economic expansion in West Prussia (today northern Poland) and Gdansk (Danzig) had become increasingly impossible for Mennonites—largely because they refused military service for religious reasons.

Prussia was a largely tolerant state, but Jews and Mennonites were problems—for different reasons. Prussian historians Reiswitz and Wadzek wrote: “Though the doctrine [of non-resistance] of the Mennonites is not exactly anti-biblical, it is most certainly anti-Prussian. We Prussians, because we are born soldiers, must rule these teachings to be incompatible with our state system; … we are not intolerant, but just” (note 1).

In contrast to the German nationalism of Prussia and other western European states like France, Russia’s Empress Catherine the Great was pursuing a different vision of empire. Her policy of expansion included the vast open short-grass steppes of present-day Ukraine, and stretched southwards towards the Black Sea and the Crimean Peninsula. Before the Russian defeat of the Ottoman Turks in 1774, this large, rich, and sparsely populated territory was home to mixed groups of fiercely independent Zaporizhzhian Cossacks, Turkic Tatar tribes (Muslim), a variety of Orthodox agrarian peasants with differing Eastern Slav dialects, Doukhobors and Molokans (“milk-drinkers”). Catherine and her predecessor had had many of these peoples removed and sought to settle these newly depopulated and under-governed frontier lands with a permanent population.


Again, in contrast to western nationalism, Catherine’s modernizing vision made no national claims on behalf of Russians; rather the Romanov Dynasty ruled with imperial, “millenarian” claims of Greater Russia as the bearer of a higher, universal law—a type of redeemer nation to benefit the empire’s smaller nationalities. This is important to understand for today’s events.

Obviously the Russian Empire of the Tsars was not a democracy in which all were citizens with identical rights and responsibilities. German-speaking, non-resistant Mennonites were welcomed into this bigger vision to live in “colonies” (as did other smaller ethnic groups) with their own specific language, church, schools--all governed by their specific charter (Privilegium). On-going Mennonite presence in Russia as “foreign colonists” was wholly contingent on fulfilling their charter-defined role as “model farmers”.

In a period of western European national awakening, Russia’s expansions were defined—in contrast to neighbours—by the logic of empire: not the self-interest of one national group (e.g., “Russians”) and its founding myths, culture, and laws, but self-sacrifice of the leading national group on behalf of smaller nationalities (note 2). The Tsarist family—the Romanov Dynasty—justified expansion, e.g., of “New Russia,” now Ukraine, not with national claims. Rather “they ruled on behalf of God—or their own dynasty—but never on behalf of the Russian people,” as David Rowley has argued. It is an imperial Christendom tradition, with a notion of a special people called to serve a historical destiny that has universal significance (note 3).

The generous Mennonite Privilegium and its terms are best understood under Greater Russia’s sense of imperial, messianic mission to serve and rule nobly over many peoples. Like other ethnic groups within Greater Russia in this era, Mennonites also began to confess Russia and its emperor as the great protector of Christendom Europe from anti-Christian forces—later typically identified with France and its democratic revolutions. This was consistent with Alexander I’s self-understanding as well (he reigned from 1801 to 1826), for example.

German-speaking “Russian” Mennonites developed their own sense of call as one smaller, patriotic, contributing nation (Völklein) within that vision of the larger Russian Empire. And they flourished. The most influential and thoughtful Mennonite leader, Johann Cornies (d. 1848), articulated this best in a letter to a Swiss missionary Daniel Schlatter about “New Russia” (today Ukraine) peopled with Molokans, Cossacks, Nogais, Doukhobors, Zaporozhians, Germans, Jews and many more:

“It is very interesting to find so many peoples living closely together. They associate calmly and quietly with one another. As they go about their business, we observe varied customs, languages, costumes, and ways of life. I do not believe that this sort of thing can be found anywhere else in the world. Our wise Imperial government has managed to bring all of us together and provide leadership that makes all of us happy. For this we give God the glory.” (Note 4)

The strong patriotic Mennonite support for the Tsar in the Crimean War in the 1850s—which appears confusing or counter-intuitive 150 years later—gives evidence for how fully they had accepted the larger framework of Russia’s sense of empire and role as divinely chosen nation, i.e., as “a special people called to serve a historical destiny of universal significance” (note 5).

If Mennonites thrived as one ethnic group among many in Russia’s greater empire, in the last decades of the nineteenth century the monarchy began to identify more explicitly with the Russian people, i.e., more with Moscow than Europe-leaning St. Petersburg. National belonging was gradually perceived as part of one’s essence, and increasingly being e.g., German-Lutheran or German-Mennonite in Russia was seen to be “invested with political significance” and “abiding political loyalties and … allegiances” (note 6). The place for Mennonites within this new national construct, including their Privilegium—so central to Mennonite identity and sense of call—would be sorely tested.

There are some similarities between the earlier imperial Christendom vision of the Tsars and the later “secular millennialism” of the communism of the Soviet Union.

The hammer and sickle symbolism adopted by the Soviet Union in 1922 represented the smashing of previous foundations, and the glorious future harvest of a better world to be gathered in, cleansed of all gods and made wholly human. With the Communist Revolution Ukraine was granted its own cultural and political identity and quasi-independence as a Soviet Republic and under the Moscow-centred leadership of the USSR. By the 1930s, however, what Communist Party General Secretary Joseph Stalin feared most was “losing Ukraine” (note 7).

In response to the threat of Ukrainian nationalism and resistance, Stalin specifically targeted Ukraine with a “lengthy schooling" designed to ruthlessly break that movement. Southern Ukraine—where most Mennonites lived—was arguably the worst affected region of the Holodomor, i.e., the man-made famine of 1932–33 which killed millions of Ukrainians (note 8). This too is important for understanding events of today.

Moreover, in the 1930s, Moscow was increasingly convinced of the “existence of an organized counter-revolutionary insurgent underground in Ukraine associated with foreign powers and foreign intelligence services,” specifically the “imperialist” interventionism of Poles and Germans in support of Ukrainian national independence (note 9).

As Rowley has argued, both “millennial” Russian empires—Tsarist and Soviet—were “destroyed by the same forces that have brought all modern empires to an end—the desire of their component peoples for national self-determination (note 10). Ukrainian sovereignty is that example, and German-speaking Mennonites in Russia/Ukraine were part of that story together with Ukrainians.


Is Russia’s old imperialism rising again? I think so, and it is pushing against strong Ukrainian nationalism. Rowley argued in the late 1990s that Russian imperialism and tradition of empire building “still provides an important element in Russian identity” (note 11). But not as a Russian nation. Nations look back to some mythic beginnings; nations preach self-interest. Empires, so it goes, look forward and preach self-sacrifice. Empires “posit a special people whose mission is to sacrifice itself to hasten the day when all humanity will be blessed by the benefits of its law and civilization” (note 12). That may be background to Putin's actions.

I think it is too simple to say Putin is irrational. His rationalism is just very different than the rationality of western nationalism. Ironically there is a parallel to the American “manifest destiny” articulated in the US Senate in 1900 by Albert Beveridge: a “divine sense of mission,” to ensure that the world does not “relapse into barbarism,” and thus understanding the USA as divinely predestined as God’s “chosen nation.”

Again I lean on Rowley here: “The legitimizing appeal of Russia’s ruling ideology arose from its association with Christianity without explicitly appealing to any particular denomination or national form, and its intent was to justify the expansive policies of an imperial state. Russia, like the United States, has, since the seventeenth century, conquered and absorbed territories for which it had no historic, nationalist claim” (note 13). Rightfully that appears strange and unacceptable today.

The long sojourn of German-speaking Mennonites in Ukraine—earlier called New Russia or South Russia—has given this group of Mennonites, for better or for worse, a little insight into about the logic of Russian empire building, of imperialism vs. nationalism, including the former’s selective benefits. All of this was learnt at a terrifying human cost, for Mennonites in Ukraine in the 1930s as well.

In my estimation—which is obviously limited but rooted in this set of experiences—events of today are at least in some ways a continuation of that story.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Georg von Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck, Beiträge zur Kenntniß der Mennoniten-Gemeinden in Europa und Amerika, Part I (Berlin, 1821), 159, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009717700.

Note 2: David G. Rowley, “‘Redeemer Empire’: Russian Millenarianism,” American Historical Review 104, no. 5 (1999), 1582–1602; 1591.

Note 3: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1598; 1599.

Note 4: No. 350, Johann Cornies to Daniel Schlatter, 11 March 1833,” Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe: Letters and Papers of Johann Cornies, vol. 1: 1812–1835, edited by Harvey L. Dyck, Ingrid I. Epp, and John R. Staples (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015), 318.

Note 5: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1599.

Note 6: Paul Werth, The Tsar’s foreign faiths. Toleration and the fate of religious freedom in imperial Russia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 151.

Note 7: Josef Stalin, “Telegram of 28 December 1932,” in Bohdan Klid and Alexander J. Motyl, eds., The Holodomor Reader: A Sourcebook on the Famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine (Edmonton, AB: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 2012), 5:27, https://holodomor.ca/the-holodomor-reader-a-sourcebook-on-the-famine-of-1932-1933-in-ukraine/.

Note 8: Cf. Stalin, “Resolution on Grain Procurement in Ukraine, 19 December 1932;” “Memorandum on Progress in preparing Spring Sowing,” in Klid and Motyl, eds., Holodomor Reader, 5:25, 37.

Note 9: “On the Need to Liquidate the Insurgent Underground, February 13, 1932,” in Klid and Motyl, eds., Holodomor Reader, 5:32f.

Note 10: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1600.

Note 11: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1600.

Note 12: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1591.

Note 13: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1597.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Warthegau, Nazism and two 15-year-old Mennonites, 1944

Katharina Esau offered me a home away from home when I was a student in Germany in the 1980s. The Soviet Union released her and her family in 1972. Käthe Heinrichs—her maiden name (b. Aug. 18, 1928)—and my Uncle Walter Bräul were classmates in Gnadenfeld during Nazi occupation of Ukraine, and experienced the Gnadenfeld group “trek” as 15-year-olds together. Before she passed, she wrote her story ( note 1 )—and I had opportunity to interview my uncle. Käthe and Walter both arrived in Warthegau—German annexed Poland—in March 1944 ( note 2 ), and the Reich had a plan for their lives. In February 1944, the Governor of Warthegau ordered the Hitler Youth (HJ) organization to “care for Black Sea German youth” ( note 3 ). Youth were examined for the Hitler Youth, but also for suitability for elite tracks like the one-year Landjahr (farm year and service) program. The highly politicized training of the Landjahr was available for young people in Hitler Youth and its counterpart the League of G...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...

Stalin’s Purge (1937-38) and Mennonite Suffering: 8 theses

1. Millions died under Stalin One of the more recent studies on the Stalin-era estimates that more than 28.7 million people suffered in the northern prisons and slave camps of the Gulag and 2.75 million people died there during Stalin’s reign ( note 1 ). To this number must be added the “close to a million political executions, the millions who died in transit to the Gulag, and some six to seven million who died of starvation during the early 1930s” ( note 2 ). The mass deportation of workers and peasants provided millions of forced labourers in the Arctic and Siberia. George K. Epp calculated that approximately one-third of Mennonites in the Soviet Union—at least 30,000—died due to exposure, beatings, overwork, disease, starvation or shootings ( note 3 ). 2. Mennonites in Ukraine suffered together with their Ukrainian neighbours Moscow was fearful of “losing Ukraine” ( note 4 ) and specifically targeted it with a “lengthy schooling” designed to ruthlessly break the threat of U...

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...

Queen Elizabeth II and Aunt Adina Neufeld Bräul

This month (April 2023) we celebrated my aunt’s 97th birthday—Adina Neufeld Bräul. Queen Elizabeth II and Aunt Adina were born within hours of each other, April 20-21, 1926. She once told me—in somewhat different words—that this makes her wonder about God’s providence … In 1944 in German-annexed Poland, my 16-year-old uncle Walter Bräul was required to report for military service. His first thought: no good soldier should be without a girlfriend! Before leaving for training, he asked one of the girls from "the trek" on a date to see a movie in Exin. Seven years later they would marry in Paraguay. Adina and her mother and sister were on the same trek or group (Gnadenfeld/ Molotschna) out of Ukraine as Walter and my mother (in the 2023 photo). Adina’s most terrible memory of the trek was when their wagon almost tipped over into a deep ravine. She was 17—a year older than Walter—and it was Walter’s 17-year-old brother Peter who literally jumped from his wagon to physically stop ...

1923 Mennonite immigrants "kept behind": Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp

An important part of the larger 1923 immigration story includes the chapter of the hundreds who were held back at Riga and Southampton and taken to the Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp for medical care. “Germany generously and magnanimously helped our organizations, on my intercession, to overcome the manifold difficulties connected with such a ( Volksbewegung ) movement of people in such critical times,” Benjamin H. Unruh wrote some years later ( note 1 ). Just as the first group of Russländer Mennonites set foot in Canada 100 years ago this month, the North American relief effort in the USSR was also winding down (August 1923). The famine relief work in 1921 and 1922 had found broad support in the North American Mennonite community. However excitement about a larger immigration of Russian Mennonites to North America was muted, and a new call to action could not forge the same level of cooperation across Mennonite groups. The plan required huge money guarantees. In USSR B.B. Janz h...

A Traveler's Impressions of the Molotschna, 1927

In November 1927, Susanna Toews of Ohrloff, Molotschna wrote to her brother Gerhard in Canada, "Father is sleeping and the sisters are reading, even though they have read the stuff ten times. . .. Twice a week we get Das Neue Dorf . We read the most important material the first evening and then father reads the rest of it the next day" ( note 1 ). A youth in Friedensruh, Molotschna reported to the communist youth paper Die Saat in 1928, that their village receives 13 copies of Das Neue Dorf , 6 copies of Die Saat , one of the Moscow-based Deutsche Zentral-Zeitung , 16 copies of Die Trompete, 2 copies of Neuland , and some Russian papers as well. On average, 2 papers per household--all communist papers. A Mennonite-based monthly agricultural journal, “The Practical Agriculturalist” ( Der praktische Landwirt ) had been approved for publication in Ukraine in 1924 but was shut down in December 1926. Government authorities in Ukraine were exasperated to see a “significant a...

The Shift from Dutch to German, 1700s

Already in 1671, Mennonite Flemish Elder Georg Hansen in Danzig published his German-language catechism ( Glaubens-Bericht für die Jugend ) as preparation for youth seeking baptism. Though educational competencies varied, Hansen’s Glaubens-Bericht assumed that youth preparing for baptism had a stronger ability to read complex German than Dutch ( note 1 ). Popular Mennonite preacher Jacob Denner (1659–1746), originally from the Hamburg-Altona Mennonite Church, lived in Danzig for four years in the early 1700s. A first volume of his Dutch sermons was published in 1706 in Danzig and Amsterdam, and then in 1730 and 1751 he published two German collections. Untrained preachers would often read Denner’s sermons: “Those who preached German—which all Prussian preachers around 1750 did, with the exception of the Danzig preachers—had no sermons books from their co-religionists other than this one by Jacob Denner” ( note 2 ). In Danzig and the Vistula Delta region there were some differences...