Skip to main content

"Russian Empire Building" and the Mennonite Experience in Russia/Ukraine

Recently a friend asked: “Based on their long historical sojourn in Russia / Ukraine, what light can Mennonites shed on Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine today?” (February 2022).

The story of so-called Russian Mennonites began in the 1780s, was defined by Greater Russia’s imperial expansion, and was almost extinguished under Stalin and his fear of rising Ukraine nationalism and minority ethnic resistance in the 1930s.

Below are a few historical learnings based on that lived experience in Ukraine, formerly known as “New Russia” or “South Russia.” A short history of Russian “empire building” from the Mennonite experience might best begin with a brief reference to German Prussia in the 18th century, where Mennonites were at home. By the 1780s, further land acquisitions or economic expansion in West Prussia (today northern Poland) and Gdansk (Danzig) had become increasingly impossible for Mennonites—largely because they refused military service for religious reasons.

Prussia was a largely tolerant state, but Jews and Mennonites were problems—for different reasons. Prussian historians Reiswitz and Wadzek wrote: “Though the doctrine [of non-resistance] of the Mennonites is not exactly anti-biblical, it is most certainly anti-Prussian. We Prussians, because we are born soldiers, must rule these teachings to be incompatible with our state system; … we are not intolerant, but just” (note 1).

In contrast to the German nationalism of Prussia and other western European states like France, Russia’s Empress Catherine the Great was pursuing a different vision of empire. Her policy of expansion included the vast open short-grass steppes of present-day Ukraine, and stretched southwards towards the Black Sea and the Crimean Peninsula. Before the Russian defeat of the Ottoman Turks in 1774, this large, rich, and sparsely populated territory was home to mixed groups of fiercely independent Zaporizhzhian Cossacks, Turkic Tatar tribes (Muslim), a variety of Orthodox agrarian peasants with differing Eastern Slav dialects, Doukhobors and Molokans (“milk-drinkers”). Catherine and her predecessor had had many of these peoples removed and sought to settle these newly depopulated and under-governed frontier lands with a permanent population.


Again, in contrast to western nationalism, Catherine’s modernizing vision made no national claims on behalf of Russians; rather the Romanov Dynasty ruled with imperial, “millenarian” claims of Greater Russia as the bearer of a higher, universal law—a type of redeemer nation to benefit the empire’s smaller nationalities. This is important to understand for today’s events.

Obviously the Russian Empire of the Tsars was not a democracy in which all were citizens with identical rights and responsibilities. German-speaking, non-resistant Mennonites were welcomed into this bigger vision to live in “colonies” (as did other smaller ethnic groups) with their own specific language, church, schools--all governed by their specific charter (Privilegium). On-going Mennonite presence in Russia as “foreign colonists” was wholly contingent on fulfilling their charter-defined role as “model farmers”.

In a period of western European national awakening, Russia’s expansions were defined—in contrast to neighbours—by the logic of empire: not the self-interest of one national group (e.g., “Russians”) and its founding myths, culture, and laws, but self-sacrifice of the leading national group on behalf of smaller nationalities (note 2). The Tsarist family—the Romanov Dynasty—justified expansion, e.g., of “New Russia,” now Ukraine, not with national claims. Rather “they ruled on behalf of God—or their own dynasty—but never on behalf of the Russian people,” as David Rowley has argued. It is an imperial Christendom tradition, with a notion of a special people called to serve a historical destiny that has universal significance (note 3).

The generous Mennonite Privilegium and its terms are best understood under Greater Russia’s sense of imperial, messianic mission to serve and rule nobly over many peoples. Like other ethnic groups within Greater Russia in this era, Mennonites also began to confess Russia and its emperor as the great protector of Christendom Europe from anti-Christian forces—later typically identified with France and its democratic revolutions. This was consistent with Alexander I’s self-understanding as well (he reigned from 1801 to 1826), for example.

German-speaking “Russian” Mennonites developed their own sense of call as one smaller, patriotic, contributing nation (Völklein) within that vision of the larger Russian Empire. And they flourished. The most influential and thoughtful Mennonite leader, Johann Cornies (d. 1848), articulated this best in a letter to a Swiss missionary Daniel Schlatter about “New Russia” (today Ukraine) peopled with Molokans, Cossacks, Nogais, Doukhobors, Zaporozhians, Germans, Jews and many more:

“It is very interesting to find so many peoples living closely together. They associate calmly and quietly with one another. As they go about their business, we observe varied customs, languages, costumes, and ways of life. I do not believe that this sort of thing can be found anywhere else in the world. Our wise Imperial government has managed to bring all of us together and provide leadership that makes all of us happy. For this we give God the glory.” (Note 4)

The strong patriotic Mennonite support for the Tsar in the Crimean War in the 1850s—which appears confusing or counter-intuitive 150 years later—gives evidence for how fully they had accepted the larger framework of Russia’s sense of empire and role as divinely chosen nation, i.e., as “a special people called to serve a historical destiny of universal significance” (note 5).

If Mennonites thrived as one ethnic group among many in Russia’s greater empire, in the last decades of the nineteenth century the monarchy began to identify more explicitly with the Russian people, i.e., more with Moscow than Europe-leaning St. Petersburg. National belonging was gradually perceived as part of one’s essence, and increasingly being e.g., German-Lutheran or German-Mennonite in Russia was seen to be “invested with political significance” and “abiding political loyalties and … allegiances” (note 6). The place for Mennonites within this new national construct, including their Privilegium—so central to Mennonite identity and sense of call—would be sorely tested.

There are some similarities between the earlier imperial Christendom vision of the Tsars and the later “secular millennialism” of the communism of the Soviet Union.

The hammer and sickle symbolism adopted by the Soviet Union in 1922 represented the smashing of previous foundations, and the glorious future harvest of a better world to be gathered in, cleansed of all gods and made wholly human. With the Communist Revolution Ukraine was granted its own cultural and political identity and quasi-independence as a Soviet Republic and under the Moscow-centred leadership of the USSR. By the 1930s, however, what Communist Party General Secretary Joseph Stalin feared most was “losing Ukraine” (note 7).

In response to the threat of Ukrainian nationalism and resistance, Stalin specifically targeted Ukraine with a “lengthy schooling" designed to ruthlessly break that movement. Southern Ukraine—where most Mennonites lived—was arguably the worst affected region of the Holodomor, i.e., the man-made famine of 1932–33 which killed millions of Ukrainians (note 8). This too is important for understanding events of today.

Moreover, in the 1930s, Moscow was increasingly convinced of the “existence of an organized counter-revolutionary insurgent underground in Ukraine associated with foreign powers and foreign intelligence services,” specifically the “imperialist” interventionism of Poles and Germans in support of Ukrainian national independence (note 9).

As Rowley has argued, both “millennial” Russian empires—Tsarist and Soviet—were “destroyed by the same forces that have brought all modern empires to an end—the desire of their component peoples for national self-determination (note 10). Ukrainian sovereignty is that example, and German-speaking Mennonites in Russia/Ukraine were part of that story together with Ukrainians.


Is Russia’s old imperialism rising again? I think so, and it is pushing against strong Ukrainian nationalism. Rowley argued in the late 1990s that Russian imperialism and tradition of empire building “still provides an important element in Russian identity” (note 11). But not as a Russian nation. Nations look back to some mythic beginnings; nations preach self-interest. Empires, so it goes, look forward and preach self-sacrifice. Empires “posit a special people whose mission is to sacrifice itself to hasten the day when all humanity will be blessed by the benefits of its law and civilization” (note 12). That may be background to Putin's actions.

I think it is too simple to say Putin is irrational. His rationalism is just very different than the rationality of western nationalism. Ironically there is a parallel to the American “manifest destiny” articulated in the US Senate in 1900 by Albert Beveridge: a “divine sense of mission,” to ensure that the world does not “relapse into barbarism,” and thus understanding the USA as divinely predestined as God’s “chosen nation.”

Again I lean on Rowley here: “The legitimizing appeal of Russia’s ruling ideology arose from its association with Christianity without explicitly appealing to any particular denomination or national form, and its intent was to justify the expansive policies of an imperial state. Russia, like the United States, has, since the seventeenth century, conquered and absorbed territories for which it had no historic, nationalist claim” (note 13). Rightfully that appears strange and unacceptable today.

The long sojourn of German-speaking Mennonites in Ukraine—earlier called New Russia or South Russia—has given this group of Mennonites, for better or for worse, a little insight into about the logic of Russian empire building, of imperialism vs. nationalism, including the former’s selective benefits. All of this was learnt at a terrifying human cost, for Mennonites in Ukraine in the 1930s as well.

In my estimation—which is obviously limited but rooted in this set of experiences—events of today are at least in some ways a continuation of that story.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Georg von Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck, Beiträge zur Kenntniß der Mennoniten-Gemeinden in Europa und Amerika, Part I (Berlin, 1821), 159, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009717700.

Note 2: David G. Rowley, “‘Redeemer Empire’: Russian Millenarianism,” American Historical Review 104, no. 5 (1999), 1582–1602; 1591.

Note 3: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1598; 1599.

Note 4: No. 350, Johann Cornies to Daniel Schlatter, 11 March 1833,” Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe: Letters and Papers of Johann Cornies, vol. 1: 1812–1835, edited by Harvey L. Dyck, Ingrid I. Epp, and John R. Staples (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015), 318.

Note 5: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1599.

Note 6: Paul Werth, The Tsar’s foreign faiths. Toleration and the fate of religious freedom in imperial Russia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 151.

Note 7: Josef Stalin, “Telegram of 28 December 1932,” in Bohdan Klid and Alexander J. Motyl, eds., The Holodomor Reader: A Sourcebook on the Famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine (Edmonton, AB: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 2012), 5:27, https://holodomor.ca/the-holodomor-reader-a-sourcebook-on-the-famine-of-1932-1933-in-ukraine/.

Note 8: Cf. Stalin, “Resolution on Grain Procurement in Ukraine, 19 December 1932;” “Memorandum on Progress in preparing Spring Sowing,” in Klid and Motyl, eds., Holodomor Reader, 5:25, 37.

Note 9: “On the Need to Liquidate the Insurgent Underground, February 13, 1932,” in Klid and Motyl, eds., Holodomor Reader, 5:32f.

Note 10: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1600.

Note 11: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1600.

Note 12: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1591.

Note 13: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1597.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vaccinations in Chortitza and Molotschna, beginning in 1804

Vaccination lists for Chortitza Mennonite children in 1809 and 1814 were published prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with little curiosity ( note 1 ). However during the 2020-22 pandemic and in a context in which some refused to vaccinate for religious belief, the historic data took on new significance. Ancestors of some of the more conservative Russian Mennonite groups—like the Reinländer or the Bergthalers or the adult children of land delegate Jacob Höppner—were in fact vaccinating their infants and toddlers against small pox over two hundred years ago ( note 2 ). Also before the current pandemic Ukrainian historian Dmytro Myeshkov brought to light other archival materials on Mennonites and vaccination. The material below is my summary and translation of the relevant pages of Myeshkov’s massive 2008 volume on Black Sea German and their Worlds, 1781 to 1871 (German only; note 3 ). Myeshkov confirms that Chortitza was already immunizing its children in 1804 when their District Offic...

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...

“Operation Chortitza” (Part II) – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44

Waldemar Janzen, my former German professor and advisee, turned eleven years old in 1943. He and his mother and 3,900 others from Chortitza and Rosenthal (Ukraine) were evacuated west to the ethnic German resettler camps in Gau Danzig-West Prussia in October that year (see Part I; note 1 ). Years later Janzen could still recall much from this childhood experience—including the impact of the visit by Professor Benjamin H. Unruh a few weeks after their arrival. “He was a man who had extended much help to his fellow Mennonites ever since they began to emigrate from Russia during the 1920s” ( note 2 ). Unruh was a father-figure to his people, and his arrival at their camp in West Prussia signaled to the evacuees that they were in good hands ( note 3 ). Unruh’s impact on 7,000 other Chortitza District villagers in Upper Silesia would be the same some weeks later ( note 4 ). Surprisingly Unruh’s West Prussian camps visit left an equally indelible impression on the Gau’s Operations Commande...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 1 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accuarte and carefully considered. ~ANF American Mennonite leaders who supported Trump will be responding to the election results in the near future. Sometimes a template or sample conference address helps to formulate one’s own text. To that end I offer the following. When Hitler came to power in 1933, Mennonites in Germany sent official greetings by telegram: “The Conference of the East and West Prussian Mennonites meeting today at Tiegenhagen in the Free City of Danzig are deeply grateful for the tremendous uprising ( Erhebung ) that God has given our people ( Volk ) through the vigor and action of [unclear], and promise our cooperation in the construction of our Fatherland, true to the Gospel motto of [our founder Menno Simons], ‘For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.’” ( Note 1 ) Hitler responded in a letter...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...

Diary of Johann Jantzen, 1843-1903

Johann Jantzen was born in 1823 in Neuteichsdorfsfeld, West Prussia, resided in Neuendorf near Danzig, and migrated late to Russia (1869), then Central Asia, and finally in 1884 to Nebraska, USA. He died in 1903. Decades later his descendants translated his diary of notable annual highlights, entitled: Accounts of various Experiences in Life. A Diary begun in the Year 1839 ( note 1 ). The little West Prussian villages he names regularly are familiar place to many with Russian Mennonite family history: Schönau, Neu Münsterberg, Schönsee, Lakendorf, Neuteicherwalde, etc. While most Russian Mennonite families left Prussia much earlier than Jantzen, his diary offers a picture of the typical rhythm of life that Mennonites lived in West Prussia over generations. It also offers something I did not expect. The revolutions across Europe in 1848 had a local impact which he mentions, and he gives us a hint as to the other political highlights and episodes of civil unrest that were on the mind...