Skip to main content

"Russian Empire Building" and the Mennonite Experience in Russia/Ukraine

Recently a friend asked: “Based on their long historical sojourn in Russia / Ukraine, what light can Mennonites shed on Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine today?” (February 2022).

The story of so-called Russian Mennonites began in the 1780s, was defined by Greater Russia’s imperial expansion, and was almost extinguished under Stalin and his fear of rising Ukraine nationalism and minority ethnic resistance in the 1930s.

Below are a few historical learnings based on that lived experience in Ukraine, formerly known as “New Russia” or “South Russia.” A short history of Russian “empire building” from the Mennonite experience might best begin with a brief reference to German Prussia in the 18th century, where Mennonites were at home. By the 1780s, further land acquisitions or economic expansion in West Prussia (today northern Poland) and Gdansk (Danzig) had become increasingly impossible for Mennonites—largely because they refused military service for religious reasons.

Prussia was a largely tolerant state, but Jews and Mennonites were problems—for different reasons. Prussian historians Reiswitz and Wadzek wrote: “Though the doctrine [of non-resistance] of the Mennonites is not exactly anti-biblical, it is most certainly anti-Prussian. We Prussians, because we are born soldiers, must rule these teachings to be incompatible with our state system; … we are not intolerant, but just” (note 1).

In contrast to the German nationalism of Prussia and other western European states like France, Russia’s Empress Catherine the Great was pursuing a different vision of empire. Her policy of expansion included the vast open short-grass steppes of present-day Ukraine, and stretched southwards towards the Black Sea and the Crimean Peninsula. Before the Russian defeat of the Ottoman Turks in 1774, this large, rich, and sparsely populated territory was home to mixed groups of fiercely independent Zaporizhzhian Cossacks, Turkic Tatar tribes (Muslim), a variety of Orthodox agrarian peasants with differing Eastern Slav dialects, Doukhobors and Molokans (“milk-drinkers”). Catherine and her predecessor had had many of these peoples removed and sought to settle these newly depopulated and under-governed frontier lands with a permanent population.


Again, in contrast to western nationalism, Catherine’s modernizing vision made no national claims on behalf of Russians; rather the Romanov Dynasty ruled with imperial, “millenarian” claims of Greater Russia as the bearer of a higher, universal law—a type of redeemer nation to benefit the empire’s smaller nationalities. This is important to understand for today’s events.

Obviously the Russian Empire of the Tsars was not a democracy in which all were citizens with identical rights and responsibilities. German-speaking, non-resistant Mennonites were welcomed into this bigger vision to live in “colonies” (as did other smaller ethnic groups) with their own specific language, church, schools--all governed by their specific charter (Privilegium). On-going Mennonite presence in Russia as “foreign colonists” was wholly contingent on fulfilling their charter-defined role as “model farmers”.

In a period of western European national awakening, Russia’s expansions were defined—in contrast to neighbours—by the logic of empire: not the self-interest of one national group (e.g., “Russians”) and its founding myths, culture, and laws, but self-sacrifice of the leading national group on behalf of smaller nationalities (note 2). The Tsarist family—the Romanov Dynasty—justified expansion, e.g., of “New Russia,” now Ukraine, not with national claims. Rather “they ruled on behalf of God—or their own dynasty—but never on behalf of the Russian people,” as David Rowley has argued. It is an imperial Christendom tradition, with a notion of a special people called to serve a historical destiny that has universal significance (note 3).

The generous Mennonite Privilegium and its terms are best understood under Greater Russia’s sense of imperial, messianic mission to serve and rule nobly over many peoples. Like other ethnic groups within Greater Russia in this era, Mennonites also began to confess Russia and its emperor as the great protector of Christendom Europe from anti-Christian forces—later typically identified with France and its democratic revolutions. This was consistent with Alexander I’s self-understanding as well (he reigned from 1801 to 1826), for example.

German-speaking “Russian” Mennonites developed their own sense of call as one smaller, patriotic, contributing nation (Völklein) within that vision of the larger Russian Empire. And they flourished. The most influential and thoughtful Mennonite leader, Johann Cornies (d. 1848), articulated this best in a letter to a Swiss missionary Daniel Schlatter about “New Russia” (today Ukraine) peopled with Molokans, Cossacks, Nogais, Doukhobors, Zaporozhians, Germans, Jews and many more:

“It is very interesting to find so many peoples living closely together. They associate calmly and quietly with one another. As they go about their business, we observe varied customs, languages, costumes, and ways of life. I do not believe that this sort of thing can be found anywhere else in the world. Our wise Imperial government has managed to bring all of us together and provide leadership that makes all of us happy. For this we give God the glory.” (Note 4)

The strong patriotic Mennonite support for the Tsar in the Crimean War in the 1850s—which appears confusing or counter-intuitive 150 years later—gives evidence for how fully they had accepted the larger framework of Russia’s sense of empire and role as divinely chosen nation, i.e., as “a special people called to serve a historical destiny of universal significance” (note 5).

If Mennonites thrived as one ethnic group among many in Russia’s greater empire, in the last decades of the nineteenth century the monarchy began to identify more explicitly with the Russian people, i.e., more with Moscow than Europe-leaning St. Petersburg. National belonging was gradually perceived as part of one’s essence, and increasingly being e.g., German-Lutheran or German-Mennonite in Russia was seen to be “invested with political significance” and “abiding political loyalties and … allegiances” (note 6). The place for Mennonites within this new national construct, including their Privilegium—so central to Mennonite identity and sense of call—would be sorely tested.

There are some similarities between the earlier imperial Christendom vision of the Tsars and the later “secular millennialism” of the communism of the Soviet Union.

The hammer and sickle symbolism adopted by the Soviet Union in 1922 represented the smashing of previous foundations, and the glorious future harvest of a better world to be gathered in, cleansed of all gods and made wholly human. With the Communist Revolution Ukraine was granted its own cultural and political identity and quasi-independence as a Soviet Republic and under the Moscow-centred leadership of the USSR. By the 1930s, however, what Communist Party General Secretary Joseph Stalin feared most was “losing Ukraine” (note 7).

In response to the threat of Ukrainian nationalism and resistance, Stalin specifically targeted Ukraine with a “lengthy schooling" designed to ruthlessly break that movement. Southern Ukraine—where most Mennonites lived—was arguably the worst affected region of the Holodomor, i.e., the man-made famine of 1932–33 which killed millions of Ukrainians (note 8). This too is important for understanding events of today.

Moreover, in the 1930s, Moscow was increasingly convinced of the “existence of an organized counter-revolutionary insurgent underground in Ukraine associated with foreign powers and foreign intelligence services,” specifically the “imperialist” interventionism of Poles and Germans in support of Ukrainian national independence (note 9).

As Rowley has argued, both “millennial” Russian empires—Tsarist and Soviet—were “destroyed by the same forces that have brought all modern empires to an end—the desire of their component peoples for national self-determination (note 10). Ukrainian sovereignty is that example, and German-speaking Mennonites in Russia/Ukraine were part of that story together with Ukrainians.


Is Russia’s old imperialism rising again? I think so, and it is pushing against strong Ukrainian nationalism. Rowley argued in the late 1990s that Russian imperialism and tradition of empire building “still provides an important element in Russian identity” (note 11). But not as a Russian nation. Nations look back to some mythic beginnings; nations preach self-interest. Empires, so it goes, look forward and preach self-sacrifice. Empires “posit a special people whose mission is to sacrifice itself to hasten the day when all humanity will be blessed by the benefits of its law and civilization” (note 12). That may be background to Putin's actions.

I think it is too simple to say Putin is irrational. His rationalism is just very different than the rationality of western nationalism. Ironically there is a parallel to the American “manifest destiny” articulated in the US Senate in 1900 by Albert Beveridge: a “divine sense of mission,” to ensure that the world does not “relapse into barbarism,” and thus understanding the USA as divinely predestined as God’s “chosen nation.”

Again I lean on Rowley here: “The legitimizing appeal of Russia’s ruling ideology arose from its association with Christianity without explicitly appealing to any particular denomination or national form, and its intent was to justify the expansive policies of an imperial state. Russia, like the United States, has, since the seventeenth century, conquered and absorbed territories for which it had no historic, nationalist claim” (note 13). Rightfully that appears strange and unacceptable today.

The long sojourn of German-speaking Mennonites in Ukraine—earlier called New Russia or South Russia—has given this group of Mennonites, for better or for worse, a little insight into about the logic of Russian empire building, of imperialism vs. nationalism, including the former’s selective benefits. All of this was learnt at a terrifying human cost, for Mennonites in Ukraine in the 1930s as well.

In my estimation—which is obviously limited but rooted in this set of experiences—events of today are at least in some ways a continuation of that story.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Georg von Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck, Beiträge zur Kenntniß der Mennoniten-Gemeinden in Europa und Amerika, Part I (Berlin, 1821), 159, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009717700.

Note 2: David G. Rowley, “‘Redeemer Empire’: Russian Millenarianism,” American Historical Review 104, no. 5 (1999), 1582–1602; 1591.

Note 3: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1598; 1599.

Note 4: No. 350, Johann Cornies to Daniel Schlatter, 11 March 1833,” Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe: Letters and Papers of Johann Cornies, vol. 1: 1812–1835, edited by Harvey L. Dyck, Ingrid I. Epp, and John R. Staples (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015), 318.

Note 5: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1599.

Note 6: Paul Werth, The Tsar’s foreign faiths. Toleration and the fate of religious freedom in imperial Russia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 151.

Note 7: Josef Stalin, “Telegram of 28 December 1932,” in Bohdan Klid and Alexander J. Motyl, eds., The Holodomor Reader: A Sourcebook on the Famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine (Edmonton, AB: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 2012), 5:27, https://holodomor.ca/the-holodomor-reader-a-sourcebook-on-the-famine-of-1932-1933-in-ukraine/.

Note 8: Cf. Stalin, “Resolution on Grain Procurement in Ukraine, 19 December 1932;” “Memorandum on Progress in preparing Spring Sowing,” in Klid and Motyl, eds., Holodomor Reader, 5:25, 37.

Note 9: “On the Need to Liquidate the Insurgent Underground, February 13, 1932,” in Klid and Motyl, eds., Holodomor Reader, 5:32f.

Note 10: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1600.

Note 11: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1600.

Note 12: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1591.

Note 13: Rowley, “Redeemer Empire,” 1597.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...

1921: Formation of the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine”

Famine was imminent; unprecedented drought; taxes and requisitions exceeded what was harvested; some villages had no horses; extortion and arrests were widespread; many men were disenfranchised and barred from village affairs (see note 1 ). Lenin responded with the 1921 “New Economic Policy” (NEP), which allowed for a degree of market flexibility within the context of socialism to ward off complete economic collapse. A fixed-tax was imposed, grain quotas were eased, farmers were allowed a small amount of land and could sell excess produce at free-market prices after taxes had been paid. Much was in the air. In secret talks, Soviet Trade Commissar Leonid Krasin told the head of the Eastern Section in the German Foreign Office, Gustav Behrendt, that the USSR was “prepared—just like Catherine the Great of old—to call hundreds of thousands of German colonists into the land and transfer them to large, closed complexes for settlement,” especially in Turkestan and the North Caucasus, be...

Mennonites and the Crimean War (1853-56)

Martin Klaassen was traveling through the Molotschna Mennonite Colony when the Crimean War broke out in 1853 ( note 1 ). His diary notes that the following hymn was sung before the sermon: December 1853 . With regards to the war which broke out between Russia and Turkey, the song, No: 723 “O Lord, the clouds of war are threatening now, above our heads we see them roll” was sung before the sermon” ( note 2 ). As the war effort grew, thousands of troops came through Molotschna: January 14, 1854 . Today our colony has received billets: in Halbstadt about 1,000 soldiers. It is said that Joh. Neufelds have offered liquor ( Branntwein ), naturally without charge. The soldiers are supposed to have marched in with jubilant singing and much hilarity. They had been very happy for the wonderful reception they got, and promised to accomplish great things. In March, England and France also declared war on Russia. March 26, 1854 . At noon today there was suddenly a military transport at ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Mobile Immigration Central Office (EWZ) Trains and Naturalization, 1943-44

They walked in one end as Soviet citizens, proceeded through a few wagons, and emerged out the other end as naturalized citizens of the German Reich . Below is a newspaper article marking the completion of the registration and naturalization of some 35,000 Mennonite resettlers—plus other Black Sea Germans. By July 1944 all the treks or transports had arrived from the Black Sea region into Greater Germany [most in Warthegau], and almost all were now registered for a more permanent settlement situation in German-annexed Poland—or so they thought. The translation is important because it offers a clear account of the process of naturalization, application and assessment. While not all Mennonites evacuated from Ukraine 1943-44 were naturalized in one of the visiting mobile Immigration Central Office trains, most were. The article and photos fill a gap in our knowledge of that experience in Nazi Germany and how naturalization was approached and experienced by some 30,000-plus Mennonites....

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...