Skip to main content

Invitation to the Russian Consulate, Danzig, January 19, 1788

Below is one of the most important original Mennonite artifacts I have seen. It concerns January 19.

The two land scouts Jacob Höppner and Johann Bartsch had returned to Danzig from Russia on November 10, 1787 with the Russian Immigration Agent, Georg von Trappe. Soon thereafter, Trappe had copies of the royal decree and agreement (Gnadenbrief) printed for distribution in the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig and other locations, dated December 29, 1787 (see pic; note 1).

After the flyer was handed out to congregants in Danzig after worship on January 13, 1788, city councilors made the most bitter accusations against church elders for allowing Trappe and the Russian Consulate to do this; something similar had happened before (note 2).

In the flyer Trappe boasted that land scouts Höppner and Bartsch met not only with Gregory Potemkin, Catherine the Great’s vice-regent and administrator of New Russia, but also with “the Most Gracious Russian Monarch” herself together with several foreign envoys while touring her acquired territories earlier in 1786. Catharine personally offered the Mennonite delegates extensive protection and privileges--“the likes of which have never been bestowed upon any foreigner during the 25 years of the Most High's glorious and eternally memorable reign.”

Trappe extended an invitation to all Mennonites—whether they had participated in the sending of the deputies or not—to a gathering at the Russian Consulate in the Lang-Garten Street in Danzig at 9am on Saturday, January 19, 1788. The “Russian Palace” served as the residence of the Russia’s General-Consul, and was on one of Danzig’s foremost addresses near the Government House, with multiple hotels as well as the British and Dutch consulates (note 3).

However with the Prussian economic blockade of not-yet-annexed Danzig, by 1786 the Government House was “quite run down” (note 4). The embargo had had its desired economic and demoralizing impact. Prussian custom houses in the harbour imposed “arbitrary and insupportable duties” on goods for export and import, and those erected outside the city gates subjected each person to the “strictest search” (note 5).

Accordingly Danzig’s population had dropped from a recent high of 60,000 inhabitants to 40,000 in 1787. In the same year, the city had 1,900 deaths compared to little more than 1,000 births, and the City of Elbing—now under Prussian rule—had surpassed Danzig in shipping trade (note 5b).

Not surprisingly Danzig officials were very apprehensive when they heard Trappe was returning from Russia with “significant” financial offers and the two land scouts (note 6). The city stood to lose cheap labour, and if the wealthy should also emigrate, they could also lose considerable tax revenue (note 7).

In Austria, France, Sweden and Prussia, Russian immigration agents found it extremely difficult—often illegal—to publish and distribute an appeal for colonists; in Danzig however city officials tolerated the recruiting agents—assuming that good terms with Russia might check Prussian repression (note 8).

Like an evangelist, in Summer 1786 Trappe had spoken "indiscriminately to all people he met on the streets, dispatched his staff everywhere, and drove into the villages surrounding Danzig to persuade farmers to move to Russia” (note 9). In August Trappe met with Danzig Flemish Elder Peter Epp, who warmly and quickly promoted the proposal (note 10) which was read in both Flemish and Frisian congregations on August 7, 1786.

City officials however were furious that the Russian offer was promoted by the clergy, and the Mennonite ministers were then prohibited from endorsing the offer or the land scouts.

To work around this, sixty Mennonite family heads signed a power-of-attorney document (Vollmacht) to send a scouting delegation—which claimed to represent 270 to 300 families—to find an appropriate location for colonization and negotiate the final conditions for immigration. Höppner and Bartsch departed for Russia on September 22, 1786.

The scouts returned November 1787, and the first gathering of interested families with the Russian General-Counsel on January 19, 1788 found a very receptive audience. From Danzig alone an astonishing 1,011 Mennonites registered for emigration; logistical details for travel were discussed, and a building committee of six was created (note 11).

Ultimately however, Danzig Council approved only 138 of the 1,011 Mennonite exit applications—mostly persons with few financial resources (note 12)—and that after significant political pressure from Russia. During this period the Danzig Flemish Mennonite church was caring for about 100 “poor” individuals (note 13).

That “even the industrious Mennonites” of Danzig and surrounding region planned to accept the “very advantageous offers from St. Petersburg … if they choose to concentrate on agriculture” was confirmation of Danzig’s rapid economic and political decline, according to one international press report, and was a “great embarrassment” for city magistrate (note 14).

This one artifact—a flyer calling Mennonites to gather at the Russian Consulate on January 19, 1788--helps us unfold that entire drama. Höppner would leave with his first group of emigrants on Easter Sunday. 120 years later, there would be more than 100,000 Mennonites in Russia.

             ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pics: Map and Consulate pic -- thanks to Brent Wiebe for locating these items.

Pic 1- Note 1: The scan of the original flyer is from Mennonite Library and Archives, Bethel College, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/sa_2_55/, with full English translation. See also Horst Quiring, “Die Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus Preussen 1788–1870,” Mennonite Life 6, no. 2 (April 1951) 37–40; 37, https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1951apr.pdf.

Note 2: Grigorii G. Pisarevskii, Izbrannye proizvedenija po istorii inostrannoj kolonizacii v Rossii [Selected works on the history of foreign colonists in Russia], edited by I.V. Cherkazyanova (Moscow: ICSU, 2011), 175, http://www.rusdeutsch.ru/biblio/files/417_biblio.pdf.

Note 3: Cf. W. F. Zernecke, Neuester Wegweiser durch Danzig und dessen Umgegend (Danzig: Gerhard, 1843), 231; 68, https://www.google.ca/books/edition/Neuester_Wegweiser_durch_Danzig_und_dess/mpJaAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1.

Note 4: Zernecke, Neuester Wegweiser durch Danzig, 117.

Note 5: See William Guthrie, A New System of Modern Geography, vol. 2 (Philadelphia, 1795), 8, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/012314850.

Note 5b: Augspurgische Ordinari Postzeitung, no. 47 (February 23, 1788): 2, https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-susba000018-8#0190.

Note 6: Paul Karge, “Die Auswanderung ost- und westpreussischen Mennoniten nach Südrussland (nach Chortiza und der Molotschna), 1787–1820,” Elbinger Jahrbuch 3 (1923) 65–98; 82, http://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=13874.

Note 7: Pisarevskii, Izbrannye proizvedenija [Selected Works], 174,

Note 8: Cf. David G. Rempel, “The Mennonite Migration to New Russia (1787–1870): I. The Colonization Policy of Catherine II and Alexander I,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 9, no. 2 (April 1935): 71–91; 76f.

Note 9: S. D. Bondar, Sekta mennonitov Rossi, v sviazi s istoriei nemetskoi kolonizatsii na iuge Rossii [The Mennonite sect in Russia: In the context of the history of German colonization in South Russia] (Petrograd, 1916), 13, https://chortitza.org/Buch/Bondar.pdf; English: https://www.mharchives.ca/download/3344/. See also Roger Bartlett, Human Capital: The Settlement of Foreigners in Russia 1762–1804 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), 127f.; 129; Pisarevskii, Izbrannye proizvedenija, 160.

Note 10: Heinrich Heese, “Das Chortitzer Mennonitengebiet 1848. Kurzgefasste geschichtliche Übersicht der Gründung und des Bestehens der Kolonien des Chortitzer Mennonitenbezirkes,” https://chortitza.org/Ber1848.html#Eg.

Note 11: Franz Harder, “Die Auswanderung aus der Danziger Mennoniten-Gemeinde nach Rußland,” Mitteilungen des Sippenverbandes der Danziger Mennoniten Familien Epp-Kauenhowen-Zimmermann, no. 4 (1937), 98–106; no. 6 (1937) 184–197, https://chort.square7.ch/Pis/K01.pdf; Karge, “Auswanderung ost- und westpreussischen Mennoniten,” 83; George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten in Rußland, vol. 1 (Lage: Logos, 1997), 78.

Note 12: Pisarevskii, Izbrannye proizvedenija [Selected Works], 175.

Note 13: Cf. Hermann G. Mannhardt, Die Danziger Mennonitengemeinde. Ihre Entstehung und ihre Geschichte von 1569–1919 (Danzig, 1919), 102, 119, https://archive.org/details/diedanzigermenno00mannuoft.

Note 14: Augspurgische Ordinari Postzeitung, no. 47 (February 23, 1788): 2.

Copies of this leaflet were distributed to the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig by Georg von Trappe, the representative of Catherine the Great, inviting the Mennonites to settle in Russia. December 29, 1787.







Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans