Invitation to the Russian Consulate, Danzig, January 19, 1788

Below is one of the most important original Mennonite artifacts I have seen. It concerns January 19.

The two land scouts Jacob Höppner and Johann Bartsch had returned to Danzig from Russia on November 10, 1787 with the Russian Immigration Agent, Georg von Trappe. Soon thereafter, Trappe had copies of the royal decree and agreement (Gnadenbrief) printed for distribution in the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig and other locations, dated December 29, 1787 (see pic; note 1).

After the flyer was handed out to congregants in Danzig after worship on January 13, 1788, city councilors made the most bitter accusations against church elders for allowing Trappe and the Russian Consulate to do this; something similar had happened before (note 2).

In the flyer Trappe boasted that land scouts Höppner and Bartsch met not only with Gregory Potemkin, Catherine the Great’s vice-regent and administrator of New Russia, but also with “the Most Gracious Russian Monarch” herself together with several foreign envoys while touring her acquired territories earlier in 1786. Catharine personally offered the Mennonite delegates extensive protection and privileges--“the likes of which have never been bestowed upon any foreigner during the 25 years of the Most High's glorious and eternally memorable reign.”

Trappe extended an invitation to all Mennonites—whether they had participated in the sending of the deputies or not—to a gathering at the Russian Consulate in the Lang-Garten Street in Danzig at 9am on Saturday, January 19, 1788. The “Russian Palace” served as the residence of the Russia’s General-Consul, and was on one of Danzig’s foremost addresses near the Government House, with multiple hotels as well as the British and Dutch consulates (note 3).

However with the Prussian economic blockade of not-yet-annexed Danzig, by 1786 the Government House was “quite run down” (note 4). The embargo had had its desired economic and demoralizing impact. Prussian custom houses in the harbour imposed “arbitrary and insupportable duties” on goods for export and import, and those erected outside the city gates subjected each person to the “strictest search” (note 5).

Accordingly Danzig’s population had dropped from a recent high of 60,000 inhabitants to 40,000 in 1787. In the same year, the city had 1,900 deaths compared to little more than 1,000 births, and the City of Elbing—now under Prussian rule—had surpassed Danzig in shipping trade (note 5b).

Not surprisingly Danzig officials were very apprehensive when they heard Trappe was returning from Russia with “significant” financial offers and the two land scouts (note 6). The city stood to lose cheap labour, and if the wealthy should also emigrate, they could also lose considerable tax revenue (note 7).

In Austria, France, Sweden and Prussia, Russian immigration agents found it extremely difficult—often illegal—to publish and distribute an appeal for colonists; in Danzig however city officials tolerated the recruiting agents—assuming that good terms with Russia might check Prussian repression (note 8).

Like an evangelist, in Summer 1786 Trappe had spoken "indiscriminately to all people he met on the streets, dispatched his staff everywhere, and drove into the villages surrounding Danzig to persuade farmers to move to Russia” (note 9). In August Trappe met with Danzig Flemish Elder Peter Epp, who warmly and quickly promoted the proposal (note 10) which was read in both Flemish and Frisian congregations on August 7, 1786.

City officials however were furious that the Russian offer was promoted by the clergy, and the Mennonite ministers were then prohibited from endorsing the offer or the land scouts.

To work around this, sixty Mennonite family heads signed a power-of-attorney document (Vollmacht) to send a scouting delegation—which claimed to represent 270 to 300 families—to find an appropriate location for colonization and negotiate the final conditions for immigration. Höppner and Bartsch departed for Russia on September 22, 1786.

The scouts returned November 1787, and the first gathering of interested families with the Russian General-Counsel on January 19, 1788 found a very receptive audience. From Danzig alone an astonishing 1,011 Mennonites registered for emigration; logistical details for travel were discussed, and a building committee of six was created (note 11).

Ultimately however, Danzig Council approved only 138 of the 1,011 Mennonite exit applications—mostly persons with few financial resources (note 12)—and that after significant political pressure from Russia. During this period the Danzig Flemish Mennonite church was caring for about 100 “poor” individuals (note 13).

That “even the industrious Mennonites” of Danzig and surrounding region planned to accept the “very advantageous offers from St. Petersburg … if they choose to concentrate on agriculture” was confirmation of Danzig’s rapid economic and political decline, according to one international press report, and was a “great embarrassment” for city magistrate (note 14).

This one artifact—a flyer calling Mennonites to gather at the Russian Consulate on January 19, 1788--helps us unfold that entire drama. Höppner would leave with his first group of emigrants on Easter Sunday. 120 years later, there would be more than 100,000 Mennonites in Russia.

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pics: Map and Consulate pic -- thanks to Brent Wiebe for locating these items.

Pic 1- Note 1: The scan of the original flyer is from Mennonite Library and Archives, Bethel College, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/sa_2_55/, with full English translation. See also Horst Quiring, “Die Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus Preussen 1788–1870,” Mennonite Life 6, no. 2 (April 1951) 37–40; 37, https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1951apr.pdf.

Note 2: Grigorii G. Pisarevskii, Izbrannye proizvedenija po istorii inostrannoj kolonizacii v Rossii [Selected works on the history of foreign colonists in Russia], edited by I.V. Cherkazyanova (Moscow: ICSU, 2011), 175, http://www.rusdeutsch.ru/biblio/files/417_biblio.pdf.

Note 3: Cf. W. F. Zernecke, Neuester Wegweiser durch Danzig und dessen Umgegend (Danzig: Gerhard, 1843), 231; 68, https://www.google.ca/books/edition/Neuester_Wegweiser_durch_Danzig_und_dess/mpJaAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1.

Note 4: Zernecke, Neuester Wegweiser durch Danzig, 117.

Note 5: See William Guthrie, A New System of Modern Geography, vol. 2 (Philadelphia, 1795), 8, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/012314850.

Note 5b: Augspurgische Ordinari Postzeitung, no. 47 (February 23, 1788): 2, https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-susba000018-8#0190.

Note 6: Paul Karge, “Die Auswanderung ost- und westpreussischen Mennoniten nach Südrussland (nach Chortiza und der Molotschna), 1787–1820,” Elbinger Jahrbuch 3 (1923) 65–98; 82, http://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=13874.

Note 7: Pisarevskii, Izbrannye proizvedenija [Selected Works], 174,

Note 8: Cf. David G. Rempel, “The Mennonite Migration to New Russia (1787–1870): I. The Colonization Policy of Catherine II and Alexander I,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 9, no. 2 (April 1935): 71–91; 76f.

Note 9: S. D. Bondar, Sekta mennonitov Rossi, v sviazi s istoriei nemetskoi kolonizatsii na iuge Rossii [The Mennonite sect in Russia: In the context of the history of German colonization in South Russia] (Petrograd, 1916), 13, https://chortitza.org/Buch/Bondar.pdf; English: https://www.mharchives.ca/download/3344/. See also Roger Bartlett, Human Capital: The Settlement of Foreigners in Russia 1762–1804 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), 127f.; 129; Pisarevskii, Izbrannye proizvedenija, 160.

Note 10: Heinrich Heese, “Das Chortitzer Mennonitengebiet 1848. Kurzgefasste geschichtliche Übersicht der Gründung und des Bestehens der Kolonien des Chortitzer Mennonitenbezirkes,” https://chortitza.org/Ber1848.html#Eg.

Note 11: Franz Harder, “Die Auswanderung aus der Danziger Mennoniten-Gemeinde nach Rußland,” Mitteilungen des Sippenverbandes der Danziger Mennoniten Familien Epp-Kauenhowen-Zimmermann, no. 4 (1937), 98–106; no. 6 (1937) 184–197, https://chort.square7.ch/Pis/K01.pdf; Karge, “Auswanderung ost- und westpreussischen Mennoniten,” 83; George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten in Rußland, vol. 1 (Lage: Logos, 1997), 78.

Note 12: Pisarevskii, Izbrannye proizvedenija [Selected Works], 175.

Note 13: Cf. Hermann G. Mannhardt, Die Danziger Mennonitengemeinde. Ihre Entstehung und ihre Geschichte von 1569–1919 (Danzig, 1919), 102, 119, https://archive.org/details/diedanzigermenno00mannuoft.

Note 14: Augspurgische Ordinari Postzeitung, no. 47 (February 23, 1788): 2.

Copies of this leaflet were distributed to the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig by Georg von Trappe, the representative of Catherine the Great, inviting the Mennonites to settle in Russia. December 29, 1787.

Carlsruher Zeitung, no. 23 (Feb. 22, 1788): 107, https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/newspaper/item/BZCD2RKBI4JBWDZ4MW3WYY35V2XSLMUJ?issuepage=3.

Comments

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws. It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Immigration to Canada, 1923: Background

In April 1921 Mennonites in the Caucasus and Don Region officially petitioned Moscow for permissions to emigrate—which Lenin had “flatly refused.” Their rationale was more than economic. “The disruption of economic conditions leads to impoverishment, which again goes hand in hand with the degradation of morals and has an alarming impact on our youth, who are also constantly exposed to the pressure of brutal and ruthless agitation on the part of those in power. … This decay of our spiritual and economic goods will only become greater and more ruinous.” ( Note 1 ) Later that year and some months before the large-scale feeding operations could begin in the Soviet Union, American Mennonite Relief (AMR) commissioner A.J. Miller petitioned the Soviet Embassy in London for exit permissions for 20,000 Mennonites ( note 1b) . He was unsuccessful. Nonetheless in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, key Mennonite leaders took a decision to work toward the re...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement! In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog