Skip to main content

Dancing with Russian Mennonites: A Short History

Russian Mennonites have traditionally had a dim or mixed view of dancing. Below is a brief history.

When it comes to moral infractions, the diaries or chronicles of Mennonite ministers are our best sources. In 1797 in Tiegenhagen, West Prussia—around the time that hundreds of Mennonite families left Prussia for Russia—the respected Frisian Elder Heinrich Donner noted that he would not baptize two young people because the one played a violin at a wedding, and the sister to the bride danced to this music together with Lutherans (note 1).

New disciplinary rules were confirmed by the congregation in 1805: “No Mennonite innkeeper shall allow music in his guesthouse.” And regarding dancing: “With a first offence, the person must come before the ministerial and apologize. The second time, they will be brought before the congregation. The third time, if there is no intention to amend behaviour, he will be excluded from the congregation” (note 2).

His Flemish colleague Gerhard Wiebe was no friend of dancing either. His diary mentions congregants “bartending at ‘the Kruge’ with music and all manner of “wicked things”; leading a “immoral” lifestyle, and dancing in “the Lame Hand” pub (note 3).

When you start to play the fiddle, it's only a matter of time before you start to dance ... and that's "flirting with the devil." After the first Mennonite colony in Russia was stabilized, leadership (and power) was seized from the land scouts Höppner and Bartsch, and lodged firmly in the hands of Chortitza’s first elder David Epp—by all accounts a polarizing figure. Epp and his ministerial ordered the powerless land scout Johann Bartsch to destroy several family musical instruments including his violin, because playing instruments was seen to be flirtation with the demonic. Bartsch reportedly broke his violin in two and threw the pieces at the feet of “the guardians of the purity of faith” (note 4).

In the Molotschna Colony in the 1830s, the esteemed schoolmaster of Johann Cornies’ Agricultural Society private high school in Ohrloff—Heinrich Heese--“even encouraged the children to learn to dance,” for which the school “suffered great damage” with regards to donations and new admissions (Heese was raised Lutheran and had married into the Mennonite fold; note 5) 

Ministers’ diaries from Russia mention dancing at weddings as a perpetual problem.

“Immorality seems to have the upper hand. Adultery, unethical behaviour, dances at weddings, and annual fairs—all this seems to be the order of the day. Separation from the congregation [excommunication] is supposed to control ethical behaviour. There is no thought of repentance and conversion. Little attention is paid to spiritual life. … Why is this happening? Because we do not enforce our own regulations through church discipline.” (Note 6)

The Mennonite Colonies had a few taverns, and in the 1860s the Molotschna successfully petitioned the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Settlers to direct tavern owners to “ban playing music and dancing at taverns to avoid beatings and crimes” (note 7).

The “enthusiastic wing” of the new Mennonite Brethren movement saw a lot of "holy" dancing in church. As one Brethren leader complained, “Becker does not regard it as sin, when brothers and sisters [‘in the Lord’] dance a waltz [in a ‘worship service!’] till the sweat goes through their clothes! Brother, this foolishness is breaking my heart” (note 8).

In 1869, a Chortitza minister was angry about dance rumours implicating him!

“January 13: Isaac Friesen told me that Isaac Klassen was spreading rumours that a fiddle had been played and there had been dancing at a wedding at brother Diedrich’s place. I had supposedly defended these goings-on in a sermon. What lies!” (Note 9)

Minutes of the annual meeting of Mennonite elders in 1893 record their “deep sadness” with the moral level in the Forestry camps (Alternative Service), especially concerning after-hours music making. Elders “urgently advise” the young men to “avoid dance music altogether, which our congregations consider to be contrary to the Confession.” In 1895 elders—now clearly exasperated—requested that all donated instruments come with the proviso: “For music, with the exception of all dance music” (note 10).

In the early 1900s, youth dancing at weddings was still a recurring problem--“wedding-eve party games with ridiculous performances,” and social games with “the goal of mutual contact between the sexes.” Ministers are instructed instead to “recommend more library reading rooms, singing groups and the establishment of Christian youth groups, etc.” (note 11).

The admonitions met with only limited success, as Jacob P. Janzen observed in his diaries in the early 1900s.

“He [the minister] also asked us to conduct ourselves in such a way that the Lord Jesus could remain to the end of the celebrations. Nevertheless, in the evening some games were played.” Janzen records the same moralistic tone in two preachers at another wedding, who “spoke so seriously and sternly to the congregation that I began to feel as if I was attending a funeral. It was as if I almost expected a funeral song at the casket after the sermon.” (Note 12)

"Things were really bad with German occupation of Ukraine in 1918: they brought not only guns but also “tactless familiarity with the occupation army … and moral surrender of our youth,” including beer-drinking and dancing to the music of the military band" (note 13).

Soviet Mennonite youth in the 1930s were without church and had had more than their share of grief in the 1930s; but what also stands out in almost each of their village reports is band music and dancing on Saturday and Sunday nights. Altonau: "Every Sunday a dance took place in the theatre auditorium. This no longer exists, since most of the band members have been abducted …" Friedensfeld, Neu Schönsee, Nikolaifeld, Schönau and Tiege--all in Sagradovka--confirm the same in their village reports: dancing every Saturday and Sunday night! (But only Sunday night in Steinfeld--also in Sagradovka; note 14)

In 1941 with German occupation, the churches opened for their first Christmas in almost a decade. The S.S. commander addressed the Christmas worshipers in Gnadenfeld. Members of the S.S. then invited the youth to the school to dance into the night. Despite years of no church, at least some young Mennonite women told the German men: “We do not like it” (note 15)!

In the last quarter of the twentieth century in Canada and the USA, attitudes were changing rapidly. In my own memory in the Niagara United Mennonite Church, sparks flew when a retired “Prussian / Uruguayan” elder danced with his granddaughter at her wedding. For Prussians this was not unusual, but the congregation’s ministerial also included a 1920s Canadian elder, one retired Russian/Paraguayan elder and a row of other ministers, each with strong opinions!

In a 1989 survey of five North American Mennonite denominations, “9 per cent of respondents said they participated in social dancing regularly, and another 24 per cent participated occasionally. These are double the percentages of a similar 1972 survey. By 1999 the percentages would have continued to increase” (note 16).

(Full disclosure: my daughter enjoyed competitive dance for many years).

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Heinrich Donner and Johann Donner, "Orlofferfelde Chronik," transcribed by Werner Janzen, 2010, p. 54. From Mennonite Library and Archives, Bethel College, Newton, KS. https://mla.bethelks.edu/Prussian%20Polish%20Mennonite%20sources/orlofferfeldechronik.html.

Note 2: Ibid., 65.

Note 3: Gerhard Wiebe, “Verzeichniß der gehaltenen Predigten samt andern vorgefallenen Merkwürdigkeiten in der Gemeine Gottes in Elbing und Ellerwald von Anno 1778 d. 1. Januar.” Transcriptions from the original by Willi Risto, http://chort.square7.ch/Buch/Risto1.pdf.

Note 4: David G. Rempel, “From Danzig to Chortitza: The First Mennonite Migration,” Preservings 20 (June 2002), 3–18; 18, https://www.plettfoundation.org/files/preservings/Preservings20.pdf. Also in Nick J. Kroeker, Erste Mennoniten Doerfer Russlands 1789–1943: Chortitza–Rosental (Vancouver, BC: Self-published, 1981), 49.

Note 5: Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe: Letters and Papers of Johann Cornies, vol. 2: 1836–1842, translated by Ingrid I. Epp; edited by Harvey L. Dyck, Ingrid I. Epp, and John R. Staples (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020), 355,  https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/100164/1/Southern_Ukrainian_Steppe_UTP_9781487538743.pdf.

Note 6: David Epp, Diaries of David Epp: 1837–1843, translated and edited by John B. Toews (Vancouver, BC: Regent College, 2000), p. 165.

Note 7: “Guardianship Committee for Foreign Settlers in South Russia,” Odessa Archives Fund 6, Inventory 5 (Part I), 189, 379, 1867. From Mennonite Heritage Centre, Winnipeg, MB. http://www.mennonitechurch.ca/programs/archives/holdings/organizations/OdessaArchivesF6.htm.

Note 8: Peter M. Friesen, The Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia 1789–1910 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978), 435. https://archive.org/details/TheMennoniteBrotherhoodInRussia17891910/ .

Note 9: Jacob D. Epp, A Mennonite in Russia: The Diaries of Jacob D. Epp, 1851–1880, translated and edited by Harvey L. Dyck (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013).

Note 10: Heinrich Ediger, ed., Beschlüsse der von den geistlichen und anderen Vertretern der Mennonitengemeinden Rußlands abgehaltenen Konferenzen für die Jahren 1879 bis 1913 (Berdjansk: Ediger, 1914), 53, 62, 87;  https://chortitza.org/Buch/MJ/MK1.pdf; https://chortitza.org/Buch/MJ/MK2.pdf; https://chortitza.org/Buch/MJ/MK3.pdf.

Note 11: Ediger, ed., Beschlüsse, 12 (Minutes 1884); 138 (Minutes 1910); 39 (Minutes 1890).

Note 12: Jacob P. Janzen, “Diary 1911–1919. English monthly summaries,” edited and translated by Katharina Wall Janzen. Jacob P. Janzen fonds, 1911–1946, vol. 2341, May 1912; April 1912. From Mennonite Heritage Centre, Winnipeg, MB.

Note 13: J. Janzen, “Diary 1911–1919,” August 31, 1918.

Note 14: “Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp.” Prepared for the German Reichsminister for the Occupied Eastern Territories, 1942. In Bundesarchiv Koblenz, BArch R6_GSK, files 620 to 633; 702 to 709. State Electronic Archive of Ukraine, https://tsdea.archives.gov.ua/deutsch/.

Note 15: Susanna Toews, Trek to Freedom: The Escape of Two Sisters from South Russia during World War II, translated by Helen Megli (Winkler, MB: Heritage Valley, 1976), 19.

Note 16: Ann Weber Becker, “Dance,” Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online (1990). https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Dance.


Print Friendly and PDF
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

Immigration to Canada, 1923: Background

In April 1921 Mennonites in the Caucasus and Don Region officially petitioned Moscow for permissions to emigrate—which Lenin had “flatly refused.” Their rationale was more than economic. “The disruption of economic conditions leads to impoverishment, which again goes hand in hand with the degradation of morals and has an alarming impact on our youth, who are also constantly exposed to the pressure of brutal and ruthless agitation on the part of those in power. … This decay of our spiritual and economic goods will only become greater and more ruinous.” ( Note 1 ) Later that year and some months before the large-scale feeding operations could begin in the Soviet Union, American Mennonite Relief (AMR) commissioner A.J. Miller petitioned the Soviet Embassy in London for exit permissions for 20,000 Mennonites ( note 1b) . He was unsuccessful. Nonetheless in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, key Mennonite leaders took a decision to work toward the re...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...
Post a Comment
Read more