Skip to main content

Russian Mennonites and Expressions of Loyalty on eve of World War I

How did Mennonites understand their commitment to non-resistance and to the Tsar?

Russia declared war on Germany on July 20, 1914. The following primary document from Bachmut / Memrik Mennonite Church Elder Peter Wilhelm Janzen to government officials a few days later (translated below) offer us a sense of how different their world was from ours.

It too had a context. Was the state suspicious about Mennonite loyalties in an impending war with Germany? Indeed. Did Mennonites feel pressured to prove their patriotism in positive and tangible ways in order to retain privileges, including property rights? Yes.

Here is a translation of Janzen's statement on behalf of 20 Mennonite villages, and addressed to the Central Committee of the "Union" [Octobrists] (note 1). At the end of this post I offer a few comments.

"We, the Mennonite landowners in 20 villages of the Bachmut District, address  authorities, institutions, and the whole of society with the following words:

Yesterday on July 22 [1914], we learned that the Emperor called on all his subjects to fight against Germany, which had the audacity to declare war on Russia [Russia declared war on Germany on July 20]. We read the Tsar’s manifesto with tenderness of soul and tears in our eyes. For our part, we are eager to proclaim loudly that we have only one fatherland—Russia. The enemies of the Russian Tsar and Russian State are our enemies, and the friends of Russia are our friends as well.

For over a hundred years we have been honoured to be subjects of His Imperial Majesty the Russian Sovereign, Emperor of Russia. Our past has clearly shown that in every national crisis, every distress experienced by Russia was also our own personal grief and misfortune. We were glad to bring our wealth, our labour, and our means to the common altar of our Fatherland—the Russian State. With the example of how we acted in the Sevastopol [Crimea], Russian-Turkish, and Japanese wars, now too we will work for the benefit of the Russian army.

We serve our [alternative] military duty in forest brigades and do not wield weapons. But as the experience of the past has shown, we can be useful by means of our organization at our own expense. We are prepared to help with the arrangement of infirmaries at our own expense. We can supply wagons without cost to transport the materials needed for the war effort, and we can help support soldiers’ families, etc.

In the next days we expect to receive instructions from local authorities about what we could do at this moment that would be useful for our soldiers and their families, and we will not hesitate to get to work for the benefit of our united and great Fatherland.

We offer our prayers for the invincibility of the Russian State, and for the spiritual strength of our Sovereign, who has taken on the great task to defend His state against this formidable and daring enemy.

While we cannot look into the future, we know that we always have been, always will be and remain forever and ever loyal subjects of His Imperial Majesty, the Russian Sovereign Emperor.

On behalf of the Mennonites of the Bachmut District, Province of Ekaterinoslav, Mennonite Church Elder Peter W. Janzen."

The statement attempts to articulate and show clearly Mennonite loyalties to Russia even in war with Germany. In a note to the text, Prof. Lindemann wrote: “German Mennonites from the colonies of Halbstadt and Gnadenfeld [Molotschna] donated 150,000 rubles for military needs, of which 20,000 rubles were put at the disposal of the Emperor, and the rest at the disposal of the local committee, as well as for the construction of an infirmary with 75 beds".

The Central Committee responded to this statement by sending the following message to Elder Janzen:

“The Central Committee of the Union of the 17th of October [Octobrist Party] conveys to you its sincerest gratitude for your message to us declaring the loyalty of the German Mennonites to our beloved sovereign, Emperor Nicholas Alexandrovich, their loyalty to our dear homeland Russia, and their readiness to take all measures to alleviate the plight of wounded Russian army soldiers, and to provide food for the families of all those called upon for the defense of the homeland.”

Mennonite ministers and civic leaders met on July 22, 1914 and called for the extension of their community’s alternative service agreement beyond forestry service: to form complete medical units to gather the wounded from the front and to transport them by hospital trains to interior hospitals; to establish special hospital facilities for the wounded in the colonies; to fundraise large sums for the Red Cross; and to grant financial aid to families of soldiers (note 2).

Peter Wilhem Janzen (b. 1857) was ordained as elder in 1887 of the Memrik and Kalinovo Mennonite Church, in the Memrik Settlement of the Bachmut District, Province of Ekaterinoslav (Dnipropetrovsk), later Donetsk Oblast. He served in that capacity for thirty years until his death from typhoid fever in 1918. He was familiar with Mennonite alternative service, serving as chaplain and forestry manager at the Anadol Forestry Service Camp, near Mariupol, for several years. Janzen was born and raised in Rudnerweide, Molotschna. He was an original settler of the Memrik Colony in 1885 and ordained as a minister the first year of settlement (note 3).

                                                                --Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---
Note 1: Memrik/ Bachmut Elder P. W. Janzen, Letter compiled in "Report of the Central Committee of the Union of October 17 [Octobrists] on its activities, from October 1, 1913, to September 1, 1914," compiled by the Assistant Chairman of the Central Committee, Professor K. E. Lindeman, Moscow. Typographers K. L. Menshov. Arbat, Nikolsky Lane, No. 21, 1914, https://chortitza.org/pdf/0v762.pdf.
Note 2: Lawrence Klippenstein, “Mennonites and Military Service in Russia,” in Mennonite Alternative Service in Russia: The Story of Abram Dück and his Colleagues 1911–1917, edited by Lawrence Klippenstein and Jacob Dick, 1–39 (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2002), 24.
Note 3: On Peter Wilhelm Janzen, cf. GRanDMA no. 654449. On the Memrik church, cf. GAMEO, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Memrik_and_Kalinovo_Mennonite_Church_(Donetsk_Oblast,_Ukraine). Photograph of Peter W. Janzen from: https://chortitza.org/FB/BF240.php.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

German Village on the Dnieper: Occupation Propaganda Photos. Chortitza, 1943

The following propaganda photos are of the Mennonites community in Chortitz, Ukraine during German occupation in World War II. German armies reached the Mennonite villages on the west bank of the Dnieper River on August 17, 1941. The photos below were taken almost two years later. However the war was already turning, and within two months the trek out of Ukraine would begin. The photographs are accompanied by an article about the Low-German speakers of Chortitza for a readership in the Reich ( note 1 ). The author repeatedly draws on the myth of one-sided German pioneer accomplishments abroad: “The first settlers found the land desolate and empty,” the reader is told, and were “left to fend for themselves in a foreign environment” where with German diligence, order and cleanliness they thrived. The article correctly recognizes the great losses of the ethnic Germans under Bolshevism--as if to convince readers that the war is a shared burden of all Germans, and which is now payin...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

Vaccinations in Chortitza and Molotschna, beginning in 1804

Vaccination lists for Chortitza Mennonite children in 1809 and 1814 were published prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with little curiosity ( note 1 ). However during the 2020-22 pandemic and in a context in which some refused to vaccinate for religious belief, the historic data took on new significance. Ancestors of some of the more conservative Russian Mennonite groups—like the Reinländer or the Bergthalers or the adult children of land delegate Jacob Höppner—were in fact vaccinating their infants and toddlers against small pox over two hundred years ago ( note 2 ). Also before the current pandemic Ukrainian historian Dmytro Myeshkov brought to light other archival materials on Mennonites and vaccination. The material below is my summary and translation of the relevant pages of Myeshkov’s massive 2008 volume on Black Sea German and their Worlds, 1781 to 1871 (German only; note 3 ). Myeshkov confirms that Chortitza was already immunizing its children in 1804 when their District Offic...

Nazi German love for Mennonites in Ukraine. Why?

For Mennonites the dramatic and massive invasion of USSR by German forces in Summer/Fall 1941 meant liberation from Soviet state terror and answer to prayer. Nazi Germany spared neither money nor personnel to free, feed, cloth, protect, heal and educate the Soviet Union’s ethnic Germans—and Mennonites in particular. Mennonite memoirs, village reports and EWZ (naturalization applications) autobiographies are consistent with praise for the German Reich and its leader. From the highest levels, goodwill, care and patience towards ethnic Germans was policy. Reichsführer -SS Heinrich Himmler was also named by Hitler as Reich Commissioner for the Consolidation of German Nationhood . This authorized Himmler and his para-military SS to oversee and coordinate the Germanization, resettlements and population transfers which came with the invasion and partial annexation of Poland (Warthegau), and later occupation plans for parts of Ukraine and Russia. The VoMi ( Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle )...

"They are useful to the state." An almost forgotten Prussian view of Mennonites, ca. 1780s-90s

In 1787 Mennonite interest for emigration was extremely strong outside the quasi independent City of Danzig in the Prussian annexed Marienwerder and Elbing regions. Even before the land scouts Johann Bartsch and Jacob Höppner had returned from Russia later that year, so many Mennonite exit applications had flooded offices that officials wrote Berlin in August 1787 for direction ( note 1a ). Initially officials did not see a problem: because Mennonites do not provide soldiers, the cantons lose nothing by their departure, and in fact benefit from the ten-percent tax imposed on financial assets leaving the state.  Ludwig von Baczko (1756-1823), Professor of History at the Artillery Academy in Königsberg, East Prussia, was the general editor of a series that included a travelogue through Prussia written by a certain Karl Ephraim Nanke. Nanke had no special love for Mennonites, but was generally balanced in his judgements and based his now almost forgotten account of Mennonites on perso...

Eduard Wüst: A “Second Menno”?

Arguably the most significant outside religious influence on Mennonite s in the 19th century was the revivalist preaching of Eduard Wüst, a university-trained Württemberg Pietist minister installed by the separatist Evangelical Brethren Church in New Russia in 1843 ( note 1 ). With the end-time prophesies of a previous generation of Pietists (and many Mennonites) coming to naught, Wüst introduced Germans in this area of New Russia to the “New Pietism” and its more individualistic, emotional conversion experience and sermons on the free grace of God centred on the cross of Christ ( note 2 ). Wüst’s 1851 Christmas sermon series give a good picture of what was changing ( note 3 ). His core agenda was to dispel gloom (which maybe could describe more traditional Mennonites) and induce Christian joy. This is the root impulse of the Mennonite Brethren beginnings years later in 1860. “Satan is not entitled to present his own as the most joyful.” His people “sing, jump, leap ( hüpfen ) ...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...