Skip to main content

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” (note 1).

The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin.

Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker (note 2).

In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia: 

“We cordially plead with you to help us as soon as possible—otherwise it looks like everyone will go astray, as the children of Israel did long ago when they turned from the Lord their God and had no leaders. So we too; we lack leaders and rulers, especially in spiritual matters.” (Note 3)

Multiple letters were sent to Prussian elders over the next years. Settlers expressed astonishment that they had been abandoned like “orphans” and “sheep in a foreign land,” in need of a “leader and ruler in spiritual matters” and a “physician” of the soul—especially for the “youth” (note 4).

In one letter, settlers reported that they had twelve couples waiting to be married—the young but also the newly widowed—and requested minimally “a wedding sermon, a sermon that would be suitable for a meeting at which church members were released or readmitted for disciplinary reasons, two [Bible] concordances, several song books and several copies of their confession of faith. They also requested that an elder be sent to them soon because they could not observe the Lord’s Supper without him” (note 5).

The Prussian ministerial was exceedingly slow to respond to correspondence from settlers and naïve about leadership possibilities—even thinking that perhaps the group never wanted an elder from outside their own settlement (note 6).

When the Frisian group appointed an elder, he was reported to be woefully inappropriate for the role and “provoked turbulence … just as he did [in Prussia],” according to the Prussian elder (note 7).

Before Prussian Mennonites left for Russia, land agent Georg Trappe confirmed that from his perspective everything was well prepared except that the clergy had not yet organized their strategy. Trappe pleaded with the Prussian group that they should make “every effort to organize good preachers (Lehrer) and shepherds of your souls, who will be concerned for the salvation of your souls and for the piety of your walk of life, so that you will also let your light shine in Russia before the people, that they may see your good works, and glorify your heavenly Father” (note 8).

The elders in Prussia had also assumed with Trappe that there would be “some mangy sheep in the herd, namely crude trouble-makers, where wisdom and faithful oversight in the service and work of the Lord would be necessary” (note 9). But this was precisely the role of the elder as articulated in the hymnal’s ordination liturgy:

"In order that the Lord’s commandments are kept holy and pure, [the elder must] eradicate the weeds that desolate the church; see that the flock is maintained in peace and unity at all times, prevent squabbles and quarrels, punish the despisers, remove all annoyances, and as an alert watchman, stand manly before the rift" (note 10).

David Cornelius Epp (1750-1802) arrived in Chortitza in 1792—three years after the first settlers—and “volunteered” to be elected elder, though he lacked the confidence of land scouts Höppner and Bartsch and of a significant minority in the community.

Epp’s first year as elder did not go well (note 11); it was detailed in a lengthy letter of formal complaint dated September 1793 to elders in Danzig and Prussia and endorsed by nineteen signatories. Epp was accused of exorbitant expenses, a lack of transparency and fraud with colony monies. Congregational members felt they had no other recourse than to issue a formal complaint to the governor regarding 1,129 rubles.

Epp had removed a preacher from office who dared challenge him, and “when matters are to be discerned in membership meetings, this seldom occurs in peace, but rather with so much fighting, quarrelling, noise, and yelling, that it is difficult to imagine if you have not seen it. … The Mennonite teachings have often been pushed far aside, actually most of the time,” according to the letter writers, including Höppner and Bartsch.

The elder’s leadership was responsible for “causing dissension, hate and strife and the like,” and the writers even compared Epp and his supporters with the militant, theocratic Anabaptist “Münsterites” of the 16th century! Not only was Epp a “fraudster” and a “liar,” who “seldom has as much money as he is able of spending,” he also drank heavily on the trek and was so intoxicated in Dubrovna that “he fell down the stairs,” according to the letter. The protesters also reminded the Prussian ministerial of Epp’s past, of having purchased stolen grain in Danzig and of not paying his debts before emigrating—even though he arrived with cash. In Mennonite tradition elders are chosen for life, but the Höppner group appealed to have Epp defrocked.

The letter of complaint to elders in Danzig and Prussia was both a cry of distress and statement of pious concern.

Epp was quick to respond and heightened the tension even more. “The colony also wants nothing to do with them,” Epp told church leadership in Prussia about Bartsch and Höppner, piling them in with those “quarrelling and divisive spirits” in the community, those “with disordered minds, disruptive, irreconcilable, and intent on wreaking havoc” (note 12).

The neglect of call and office by the Prussian ministerial to prepare, identify, mentor, ordain and send a fitting elder for the overwhelming needs of their daughter church in Russia was a direct and major cause of the near collapse of the Chortitza colony in its first decade.

Finally in 1794, six years after the first group left for Russia, an elder and minister were sent from Prussia to bring order in the community (note 13).

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

--- Notes---

Note 1: Jacob Wienss, “Ein Chortitzer Brief aus dem Jahre 1805. Zur Frühgeschichte der Ansiedlung altpreußischer Mennoniten in Südrußland,” Mitteilungen des Sippenverbandes der Danziger Mennoniten Familien Epp-Kauenhowen-Zimmermann, no. 3 (1940) 68–71; 71. https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mitteilunge%20des%20Sippenverbandes%20der%20Danziger%20Mennoniten-Familien/1940-1941/.

Note 2: Cf. Walther Mitzka, “Die Sprache der deutschen Mennoniten,” Heimatblätter des Deutschen Heimatbundes Danzig 8, no. 1 (1930) 2–23; 9, http://pbc.gda.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=12078; Johannes van der Smissen, The History of the Church in Chortitza. Towards an Understanding of the History of the Church in the Mennonite Colonies in South Russia (1856), translated and edited by William Schroeder, in Preservings, no. 15 (1999), 4, https://www.plettfoundation.org/preservings/archive/15/. George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten, vol. 1 (Lage: Logos, 1997) 84f.; Isaac Kröcker, Zwanzig Predigten über verschiedene Texte der heiligen Schrift (Königsberg, 1788).

Note 3: Letter to the Danzig Flemish congregation, December 18, 1789, signed by Peter Dyck, Cornelius Friesen, Jacob Wienß, Gerhard Neufeldt, Bernhard Penner, David Giesbrecht, reprinted in Franz Harder, “Die Auswanderung aus der Danziger Mennoniten-Gemeinde nach Rußland,” Mitteilungen des Sippenverbandes der Danziger Mennoniten Familien Epp-Kauenhowen-Zimmermann, no. 6 (1937) 184–197; 186f., https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Pis/K01.pdf.

Note 4: Letter in Gerhard Wiebe, “Verzeichniß der gehaltenen Predigten samt andern vorgefallenen Merkwürdigkeiten in der Gemeine Gottes in Elbing und Ellerwald von Anno 1778 d. 1. Januar,” transcriptions from the original by Willi Risto, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Buch/Risto1.pdf; also Ingrid Lamp: https://mla.bethelks.edu/Prussian Polish Mennonite sources/wiebe.html.

Note 5: Van der Smissen, "History of the Church in Chortitza," 4.

Note 6: Wiebe, “Verzeichniß,” 196; David H. Epp, Die Chortitzer Mennoniten. Versuch einer Darstellung des Entwicklungsganges derselben (Odessa, 1889) 55. https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Dok/Epp.pdf.

Note 7: Heinrich Donner and Johann Donner, Orlofferfelde Chronik, transcribed by Werner Janzen, 2010, 46; 43. From Mennonite Library and Archives-Bethel College, Prussian-Polish sources (online). https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/cong_303/ok63/orlofferfeldechronik.html; English translation; https://www.mharchives.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Heinrich-Donner-Diary-12-Feb-2023.pdf.

Note 8: In D. Epp, Chortitzer Mennoniten, 46.

Note 9: Georg Trappe, in D. Epp, Chortitzer Mennoniten, 32.

Note 10: Hymn to be sung immediately after the ordination of a new elder: “Auf, jauchze! Lob’ und singe du Volk,” in Geistreiches Gesangbuch, zur öffentlichen und besondern Erbauung der Mennonitischen Gemeine in und vor der Stadt Danzig (Marienwerder, West Preußen, 1780), no. 298, v. 4 (p. 321), http://pbc.gda.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=8000.

Note 11: For the following, cf. G. Wiebe, “Verzeichniß der gehaltenen Predigten.” Bartsch had quietly joined the Flemish by this point; cf. George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten, vol. I (Lage: Logos, 1997), 91. According to Henry Schapansky, Epp had embroiled himself “in a financial dispute with another Lehrer [preacher] and had arranged for this (unknown) Lehrer to be dismissed from office” (Schapansky, Old Colony (Chortitza) of Russia [Rosenort, MB: Self-published, 2001], 110).

Note 12: G. Wiebe, “Verzeichniß,” 228, 255.

Note 13: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-future-of-mennonite-church-is-not.html.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), November 18, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/shaky-beginings-as-faith-community.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...

Ideas for Educational Reform, 1832

After four decades in Russia, the president of the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Colonists, Andrei Fadeev, considered only eight of 116 Mennonite teachers in the two larger regions of Katerynoslav and Tauria—which included the Molotschna—fit to teach ( note 1 ). Jakob Bräul’s Rudnerweide schoolhouse was given the same status as Heinrich Heese’s Ohrloff Agricultural Society School with regard to policies and “especially for the teaching of Russian” ( note 2 ). Fadeev triggered great angst when by “imperial decree” he distributed a book to church elders written by German Mennonite Abraham Hunzinger on the modernization of Mennonite schools and church. It was a friendly gesture and poke. The Molotschna was already a tinderbox, and this spark introduced by a state official to strengthen the community ignited a fire in the colony. Fadeev wrote to Johann Cornies on January 12, 1832: “Most valued Cornies ... I advise you to acquire and read a booklet sent to your church leaders f...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Life in Exin, 1944: German-Occupied Poland

After the 1943-44 portion of the Great Trek ended with settlement of some 35,000 Mennonites in German-annexed Poland, the Gnadenfeld area trek members were scattered in resettler camps ( Umsiedler-Lager ) around Exin ( Kcynia ) and the Altburgund District administrative centre of Dietfurt ( Żnin ), including the hamlets of Kiefernrode ( Słupowiec ), Schwarzerde ( Malice ), Schmiedebach, etc. ( note 1) . Until World War I, the area was part of the German-Prussian Province of Posen, about 170 kilometres south-west of Danzig ( Gdańsk ) and about 400 kilometres east of Berlin. Almost all ethnic German resettlers from Ukraine arrived through Litzmannstadt (Łódź), one of two entrance points from the east into new German province of “Warthegau” ( note 2) . Here thousands were cleansed, deloused and processed daily. Some Gnadenfeld group members were brought to Janowitz (Janowiec) , near Hermannsbad in the District of Hohensalza for quarantine. Here fresh straw was laid out on the floor for ...

Russo-Japanese War and the Mennonite Response, 1904-05

In February 1904, Russia declared war on Japan and Mennonite congregations sent the Tsar messages of loyalty, love and prayers. The large Lichtenau-Petershagen-Schönsee congregation in the Mennonite Molotschna Colony in today’s Ukraine led by 80-year-old Elder (Bishop) Jakob Töws expressed its “deep loyalty and love for the throne and the Fatherland” ( note 1 ). Similarly, the Mennonite Chortitza congregation declared that Mennonites bow “humbly before the Imperial Majesty with most faithful love and devotion,” and “together with all faithful subjects send their most passionate prayers and supplications to the Most High, that He may extend his mighty hand over the beloved Tsar and the Russian people, and that peace may soon be returned” ( note 2 ). The Einlage Mennonite Brethren congregation offered a similar statement, “inspired by feelings of boundless dedication to the Sovereign Fatherland,” with “passionate prayers” for the Tsar and Fatherland, based on 1 Timothy 2:1–4 ( note 3 ...

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß";  note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...

When Singing becomes Urgent: Survival and Salvation through Music

Singing: survival and salvation 1) Language change, 1767, Danzig : Flemish Elder Hans van Steen published A Spiritual Hymnal for General Edification, designed also for private and family settings to “awaken devotion and edification,” and in particular for the youth—that they may “not use it out of mere habit, but rather for the true uplifting of the heart” ( note 1 ). 2) Revivalism, 1850s . The influence of Eduard Wüst--revivalist minister installed by nearby separatist Evangelical Brethren--on the Mennonites was “boundless,” according to State Councillor E. H. Busch. “Satan is not entitled to present his own as the most joyful.” His people “sing, jump, leap ( hüpfen ) and dance,” while the Christian appears “cheerless and stooped over. … Why, when one opens a song book, are hymns about the cross and affliction chosen almost instinctively instead of songs of praise and thanksgiving? Isn’t the devil also having his fun in all of this?” Mennonite Brethren historian P.M. Friesen called ...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...

Invitation to the Russian Consulate, Danzig, January 19, 1788

B elow is one of the most important original Mennonite artifacts I have seen. It concerns January 19. The two land scouts Jacob Höppner and Johann Bartsch had returned to Danzig from Russia on November 10, 1787 with the Russian Immigration Agent, Georg von Trappe. Soon thereafter, Trappe had copies of the royal decree and agreement (Gnadenbrief) printed for distribution in the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig and other locations, dated December 29, 1787 ( see pic ; note 1 ). After the flyer was handed out to congregants in Danzig after worship on January 13, 1788, city councilors made the most bitter accusations against church elders for allowing Trappe and the Russian Consulate to do this; something similar had happened before ( note 2 ). In the flyer Trappe boasted that land scouts Höppner and Bartsch met not only with Gregory Potemkin, Catherine the Great’s vice-regent and administrator of New Russia, but also with “the Most Gracious Russian Monarch” herse...