Skip to main content

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” (note 1).

The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin.

Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker (note 2).

In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia: 

“We cordially plead with you to help us as soon as possible—otherwise it looks like everyone will go astray, as the children of Israel did long ago when they turned from the Lord their God and had no leaders. So we too; we lack leaders and rulers, especially in spiritual matters.” (Note 3)

Multiple letters were sent to Prussian elders over the next years. Settlers expressed astonishment that they had been abandoned like “orphans” and “sheep in a foreign land,” in need of a “leader and ruler in spiritual matters” and a “physician” of the soul—especially for the “youth” (note 4).

In one letter, settlers reported that they had twelve couples waiting to be married—the young but also the newly widowed—and requested minimally “a wedding sermon, a sermon that would be suitable for a meeting at which church members were released or readmitted for disciplinary reasons, two [Bible] concordances, several song books and several copies of their confession of faith. They also requested that an elder be sent to them soon because they could not observe the Lord’s Supper without him” (note 5).

The Prussian ministerial was exceedingly slow to respond to correspondence from settlers and naïve about leadership possibilities—even thinking that perhaps the group never wanted an elder from outside their own settlement (note 6).

When the Frisian group appointed an elder, he was reported to be woefully inappropriate for the role and “provoked turbulence … just as he did [in Prussia],” according to the Prussian elder (note 7).

Before Prussian Mennonites left for Russia, land agent Georg Trappe confirmed that from his perspective everything was well prepared except that the clergy had not yet organized their strategy. Trappe pleaded with the Prussian group that they should make “every effort to organize good preachers (Lehrer) and shepherds of your souls, who will be concerned for the salvation of your souls and for the piety of your walk of life, so that you will also let your light shine in Russia before the people, that they may see your good works, and glorify your heavenly Father” (note 8).

The elders in Prussia had also assumed with Trappe that there would be “some mangy sheep in the herd, namely crude trouble-makers, where wisdom and faithful oversight in the service and work of the Lord would be necessary” (note 9). But this was precisely the role of the elder as articulated in the hymnal’s ordination liturgy:

"In order that the Lord’s commandments are kept holy and pure, [the elder must] eradicate the weeds that desolate the church; see that the flock is maintained in peace and unity at all times, prevent squabbles and quarrels, punish the despisers, remove all annoyances, and as an alert watchman, stand manly before the rift" (note 10).

David Cornelius Epp (1750-1802) arrived in Chortitza in 1792—three years after the first settlers—and “volunteered” to be elected elder, though he lacked the confidence of land scouts Höppner and Bartsch and of a significant minority in the community.

Epp’s first year as elder did not go well (note 11); it was detailed in a lengthy letter of formal complaint dated September 1793 to elders in Danzig and Prussia and endorsed by nineteen signatories. Epp was accused of exorbitant expenses, a lack of transparency and fraud with colony monies. Congregational members felt they had no other recourse than to issue a formal complaint to the governor regarding 1,129 rubles.

Epp had removed a preacher from office who dared challenge him, and “when matters are to be discerned in membership meetings, this seldom occurs in peace, but rather with so much fighting, quarrelling, noise, and yelling, that it is difficult to imagine if you have not seen it. … The Mennonite teachings have often been pushed far aside, actually most of the time,” according to the letter writers, including Höppner and Bartsch.

The elder’s leadership was responsible for “causing dissension, hate and strife and the like,” and the writers even compared Epp and his supporters with the militant, theocratic Anabaptist “Münsterites” of the 16th century! Not only was Epp a “fraudster” and a “liar,” who “seldom has as much money as he is able of spending,” he also drank heavily on the trek and was so intoxicated in Dubrovna that “he fell down the stairs,” according to the letter. The protesters also reminded the Prussian ministerial of Epp’s past, of having purchased stolen grain in Danzig and of not paying his debts before emigrating—even though he arrived with cash. In Mennonite tradition elders are chosen for life, but the Höppner group appealed to have Epp defrocked.

The letter of complaint to elders in Danzig and Prussia was both a cry of distress and statement of pious concern.

Epp was quick to respond and heightened the tension even more. “The colony also wants nothing to do with them,” Epp told church leadership in Prussia about Bartsch and Höppner, piling them in with those “quarrelling and divisive spirits” in the community, those “with disordered minds, disruptive, irreconcilable, and intent on wreaking havoc” (note 12).

The neglect of call and office by the Prussian ministerial to prepare, identify, mentor, ordain and send a fitting elder for the overwhelming needs of their daughter church in Russia was a direct and major cause of the near collapse of the Chortitza colony in its first decade.

Finally in 1794, six years after the first group left for Russia, an elder and minister were sent from Prussia to bring order in the community (note 13).

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

--- Notes---

Note 1: Jacob Wienss, “Ein Chortitzer Brief aus dem Jahre 1805. Zur Frühgeschichte der Ansiedlung altpreußischer Mennoniten in Südrußland,” Mitteilungen des Sippenverbandes der Danziger Mennoniten Familien Epp-Kauenhowen-Zimmermann, no. 3 (1940) 68–71; 71. https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mitteilunge%20des%20Sippenverbandes%20der%20Danziger%20Mennoniten-Familien/1940-1941/.

Note 2: Cf. Walther Mitzka, “Die Sprache der deutschen Mennoniten,” Heimatblätter des Deutschen Heimatbundes Danzig 8, no. 1 (1930) 2–23; 9, http://pbc.gda.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=12078; Johannes van der Smissen, The History of the Church in Chortitza. Towards an Understanding of the History of the Church in the Mennonite Colonies in South Russia (1856), translated and edited by William Schroeder, in Preservings, no. 15 (1999), 4, https://www.plettfoundation.org/preservings/archive/15/. George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten, vol. 1 (Lage: Logos, 1997) 84f.; Isaac Kröcker, Zwanzig Predigten über verschiedene Texte der heiligen Schrift (Königsberg, 1788).

Note 3: Letter to the Danzig Flemish congregation, December 18, 1789, signed by Peter Dyck, Cornelius Friesen, Jacob Wienß, Gerhard Neufeldt, Bernhard Penner, David Giesbrecht, reprinted in Franz Harder, “Die Auswanderung aus der Danziger Mennoniten-Gemeinde nach Rußland,” Mitteilungen des Sippenverbandes der Danziger Mennoniten Familien Epp-Kauenhowen-Zimmermann, no. 6 (1937) 184–197; 186f., https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Pis/K01.pdf.

Note 4: Letter in Gerhard Wiebe, “Verzeichniß der gehaltenen Predigten samt andern vorgefallenen Merkwürdigkeiten in der Gemeine Gottes in Elbing und Ellerwald von Anno 1778 d. 1. Januar,” transcriptions from the original by Willi Risto, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Buch/Risto1.pdf; also Ingrid Lamp: https://mla.bethelks.edu/Prussian Polish Mennonite sources/wiebe.html.

Note 5: Van der Smissen, "History of the Church in Chortitza," 4.

Note 6: Wiebe, “Verzeichniß,” 196; David H. Epp, Die Chortitzer Mennoniten. Versuch einer Darstellung des Entwicklungsganges derselben (Odessa, 1889) 55. https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Dok/Epp.pdf.

Note 7: Heinrich Donner and Johann Donner, Orlofferfelde Chronik, transcribed by Werner Janzen, 2010, 46; 43. From Mennonite Library and Archives-Bethel College, Prussian-Polish sources (online). https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/cong_303/ok63/orlofferfeldechronik.html; English translation; https://www.mharchives.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Heinrich-Donner-Diary-12-Feb-2023.pdf.

Note 8: In D. Epp, Chortitzer Mennoniten, 46.

Note 9: Georg Trappe, in D. Epp, Chortitzer Mennoniten, 32.

Note 10: Hymn to be sung immediately after the ordination of a new elder: “Auf, jauchze! Lob’ und singe du Volk,” in Geistreiches Gesangbuch, zur öffentlichen und besondern Erbauung der Mennonitischen Gemeine in und vor der Stadt Danzig (Marienwerder, West Preußen, 1780), no. 298, v. 4 (p. 321), http://pbc.gda.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=8000.

Note 11: For the following, cf. G. Wiebe, “Verzeichniß der gehaltenen Predigten.” Bartsch had quietly joined the Flemish by this point; cf. George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten, vol. I (Lage: Logos, 1997), 91. According to Henry Schapansky, Epp had embroiled himself “in a financial dispute with another Lehrer [preacher] and had arranged for this (unknown) Lehrer to be dismissed from office” (Schapansky, Old Colony (Chortitza) of Russia [Rosenort, MB: Self-published, 2001], 110).

Note 12: G. Wiebe, “Verzeichniß,” 228, 255.

Note 13: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-future-of-mennonite-church-is-not.html.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), November 18, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/shaky-beginings-as-faith-community.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...

Eduard Wüst: A “Second Menno”?

Arguably the most significant outside religious influence on Mennonite s in the 19th century was the revivalist preaching of Eduard Wüst, a university-trained Württemberg Pietist minister installed by the separatist Evangelical Brethren Church in New Russia in 1843 ( note 1 ). With the end-time prophesies of a previous generation of Pietists (and many Mennonites) coming to naught, Wüst introduced Germans in this area of New Russia to the “New Pietism” and its more individualistic, emotional conversion experience and sermons on the free grace of God centred on the cross of Christ ( note 2 ). Wüst’s 1851 Christmas sermon series give a good picture of what was changing ( note 3 ). His core agenda was to dispel gloom (which maybe could describe more traditional Mennonites) and induce Christian joy. This is the root impulse of the Mennonite Brethren beginnings years later in 1860. “Satan is not entitled to present his own as the most joyful.” His people “sing, jump, leap ( hüpfen ) ...

Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (Holodomor), 1932-1933

In 2008 the Canadian Parliament passed an act declaring the fourth Saturday in November as “Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (‘Holodomor’) Memorial Day” ( note 1 ). Southern Ukraine was arguably the worst affected region of the famine of 1932–33, where 30,000 to 40,000 Mennonites lived ( note 2 ). The number of famine-related deaths in Ukraine during this period are conservatively estimated at 3.5 million ( note 3 ). In the early 1930s Stalin feared growing “Ukrainian nationalism” and the possibility of “losing Ukraine” ( note 4 ). He was also suspicious of ethnic Poles and Germans—like Mennonites—in Ukraine, convinced of the “existence of an organized counter-revolutionary insurgent underground” in support of Ukrainian national independence ( note 5 ). Ukraine was targeted with a “lengthy schooling” designed to ruthlessly break the threat of Ukrainian nationalism and resistance, and this included Ukraine’s Mennonites (viewed simply as “Germans”). Various causes combined to bring on w...

Becoming German: Ludendorff Festivals in Molotschna, 1918

During the friendly German military occupation of Ukraine at the end of WWI, patriotic “Ludendorff Festivals” were encouraged by German forces to raise funds to support injured German soldiers. A first such festival in the Molotschna was held on June 25, 1918 in Ohrloff, and was attended by “a great many German officers, soldiers and colonists with music, [patriotic] speeches and social interaction” From the perspective of the German army press, the event was “extremely enjoyable;” it was accompanied with music by a 30-piece regiment orchestra, and beer, sausage, sandwiches, ice-cream, raspberries and cherries were sold. It closed with a “small dance,” raising 7,387 rubles or 9,850 German marks in donations ( note 1 ). Later that summer, a Ludendorff Festival in Halbstadt began with Sunday worship, followed by an early concert, games and performances by the Selbstschutz , as well as “entertainment and merriment of every kind,” with short plays and dancing into the morning ( note ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...