Skip to main content

Moral Condition of Molotschna: Teacher Reports, 1856

Johann Cornies was a young lad when he immigrated to Russia with his parents. They first wintered in Chortitza where, under the supervision of his aging father, the teen managed Jacob Höppner’s brandy distillery. There he observed the moral impact of poverty on good people (Chortitza pioneers came with little capital; note 1).

In the years after his death in 1848, a landless crisis dominated the Mennonite Molotschna Colony--the district the had so carefully and energetically nurtured to achieve excellent economic and social outcomes. The crisis was marked by corruption, inequities, and economic disparities. As David G. Rempel summarizes, it shook most of the Mennonite villages “to their very foundation” (note 2).

In 1856 the Molotschna Society for Advancement of Schools tasked teachers to submit reflections on the moral condition of colony inhabitants and to offer their advice.

Thirty-seven of these essays are buried in the massive 140,000-page archive by Peter J. Braun, lost in 1921 and rediscovered in Odessa in 1990. While preparing a publication on the history of education in the Molotschna in 1921 (note 3), Braun summarized the essays. The summary remains unpublished but is found in a 1932 letter to his brother Abram (note 4). The Brauns were reflecting on the moral decline of the colony and the beginnings of the Mennonite Brethren movement four years later. But decline was occurring in a context of social and economic collapse.

David Rempel suggested decades ago that the “seemingly endemic wranglings and splits” of the Mennonite church in South Russia were only seldom or superficially related to doctrine, and “almost invariably and intimately bound up with some of the most serious social and economic issues” that afflicted one or more of the congregations in the settlement (note 5).

Shockingly teachers used the following descriptive terms for colony life: “crude, coarse, impudent, obstreperous, stubborn,” and marked by “drunkenness, cursing, outrages, disputes, fraud in commerce” (note 6).

One teacher cited Jeremiah 9:4 to make his point: “Beware of your friends; do not trust anyone in your clan. For every one of them is a deceiver”; another Psalm 14:3—“All have turned away, all have become corrupt; there is no one who does good, not even one.”

Other teachers included the following descriptions:

"Indecent behaviour occurs in all places, even in the churches; brawling behaviour is usual at weddings: crazed singing, dancing and drinking; it is customary to mock marriage with whoring and adulterous verses; … respected persons lead in immorality; members of the church wallow undisturbed in vice; Sundays and holidays are desecrated; churches are empty and taverns full; the better-tempered are slandered and mocked …; [morally] everything is quite dilapidated; is at a very miserable and broken level; is in the greatest state of decline."

I have extracted and transcribed two of these reports: one from the 24-year-old teacher Bernhard Harder (b. 1832, #37422) in Blumstein. Harder would later become a powerful preacher/ evangelist and published poet/ hymn writer (note 7).

The other report was written by 53-year-old Jacob Bräul (b. 1803, #69626) of Rudnerweide. Bräul “had as pupils the grandchildren of his first pupils” (note 8); P. M. Friesen praised Bräul as one of the very few Mennonite instructors of his generation whose teaching “created a special sensation” in the colony, who had the “ability to awaken in his pupils an interest in learning,” and who was “famous” not only for his teaching of Russian, but also his approach to “arithmetic, singing, and penmanship” (note 9). But like his younger colleagues, he was landless and retired in poverty (note 10).

Bernhard Harder dared to name the power differential. The teacher’s “position in the community makes it, if not impossible, extremely difficult for him to enter into this matter specifically and impartially; especially since the request to do so has come from a side that must necessarily offer a point of view” (note 11). Authorities who worked closely with corrupt Mennonite leaders make “superficial comparisons,” Harder argues between Mennonites and other ethnic groups and “give our people exaggerated recognition and regard us as a model of all virtues. But the schoolteacher's eye sees quite differently.”

“What shame! What a disgrace!, when the older drunkard, trampling under foot the dignity of his age, indulging in his vice and rejecting all moral feeling, out does even the wildest youth in arrogance, folly and disorderly chatter! … The weddings as they are celebrated here are real nurseries of Satan: here the youth, even the schoolchildren, are actually and apparently quite deliberately consecrated to him! … The adults must first become moral and not undermine the morality of the youth with such diligence! Order must be stricter, but it must be understood in true biblical terms in accordance with the meaning of our confession. … If one were to shed more light on the social and family life of many congregational members, … arrogance, selfishness, boasting, indeed shame and vice confront us everywhere. … Injustice has gained the upper hand and love, self-sacrificing love, which alone is the basis of true morality, is growing cold in many! … As long as the stumbling blocks that are so pernicious for the children are not removed, in short, as long as the greater part of the brotherhood, and especially those at the top, remain in an unconverted state, the prospect of a marked improvement in our moral condition will remain in the misty distance. Without Christ we can do nothing, and until He is fully established among us, we cannot think of true morality.”

At some risk to his livelihood in the village that hired and paid him, Harder pulled no punches.

The tone and energy of Jacob Bräul’s report is decidedly calmer (note 12). Near the end of a successful teaching career and able to put the present into a longer context, he chose a different route, reflecting the religious stirrings that accompanied the unrest.

Bräul agreed with his younger colleagues that the morality in the colony “is not very commendable.” But in contrast to his colleagues, he did not detail the “sad manifestations” of immorality in the community. Rather, he chose to focus on a root problem—which at his stage of his life was “not difficult” to see, he says.

“Without the inner renewal of the whole person, one’s external morality is nothing, lacking both strength and anchor,” Bräul wrote. A Christian community “is to be without blemish, as the Word of God commands,” but rules on their own—which some were asking for—are weak in face of the “temptations of evil vices and desires that rise up within a person.”

In his assessment, the “majority of inhabitants are satisfied with an external morality,” which is ultimately insufficient to shape individuals “to live and act morally.”

Bräul offered three scripture texts as guideposts. The first, from the Apostle Paul to the Ephesians (4:22–32) reminds the Christian community to continually take off the old self and its “walk of life, corrupt and deluded by its lusts, and to be renewed in the spirit of your minds.” Bräul pointed to the “admonitions of the Apostle Paul” and contrasted those to “the various transgressions amongst us.”

Secondly, he recalled the great commandment to “love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might” (Deuteronomy 6:4–9), and complemented this with a third text, to “meditate day and night on the Book of the Law, for then you shall make your way prosperous, and then you shall be successful” (Joshua 1:8).

In reflection on his own community, Bräul suggested that “the one who does not follow these words of God will not be able to live and act completely morally. Whoever does not have the mind of Christ, is not his.” Moving forward he recommended a prayer, namely that “the mind and spirit of Christ may soon be enlivened amongst us!”

Harder and Bräul both call for religious renewal in the colony and hint of schisms still to come. Neither joined the Mennonite Brethren movement four years later (though at least one of Bräul’s landless adult children did) but chose to work towards similar ends within the established institutions. Harder and one of his lay ministerial colleagues Franz Isaac—a leader of the landless fight—later visited and reported on a worship service of the Mennonite Brethren, noting differences but finding nothing offensive (note 13).

I have not transcribed the other 35 essays; however if Peter Braun is correct there was a consensus among teachers that the community was on the brink of moral collapse. And with an insight from Cornies, I would add that the poverty, corruption and injustice connected to the landless crisis provided an important context for understanding that collapse.

Here again David Rempel is not far off the mark: “Had it not been for the extreme narrow-mindedness and intolerance of the rank and file of the Mennonite preachers [most of whom were landholders] this religious dissent could have easily been composed [contained?].” Many landless seemed to find in the brethren movement their place to dissent or find some joy, “and henceforth the land quarrel was often closely intertwined with the religious one” (note 14).

The landless crisis was not the singular cause of the observed moral crisis; the Crimean War which concluded that same year (1856) undoubtedly played a role. The youth who travelled in the wagon convoys—about seven trips per farmstead, 550 km away—acquired new and unsavory habits:

“These boys were told to smoke and also drink brandy to ward off contagious diseases. ... They also acquired the use of profane language from their rough companions. When they returned home they felt quite out of place with the other boys of the village. ... Father said war did not tend to improve mankind.” (Note 15)

Notably landholders often hired out these wartime obligations to the landless in their village which only exacerbated the problem observed and reported by the colony’s teachers. The reports offer an important window onto the Mennonite experiment in Molotschna.

Cornelius Krahn claimed that Harder’s later work in "cultural and spiritual aspects" was “a singular contribution comparable to that of Johann Cornies in the economic realm” (note 16). That is certainly an overstatement, but it does point to the contribution of teachers (and increasingly teacher-preachers), both in the old church and in the Mennonite brethren movement, in time of crisis.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: [N.n.] Gavel, “Beilage: Johann Cornies, geboren den 29. Juni 1789, gestorben den 13. März 1848,” Unterhaltungsblatt 3, no. 10 (October 1848), 9–18, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Buch/Walt1.pdf [= eulogy for Cornies; reference to his early days] .

Note 2: David G. Rempel, “The Mennonite Colonies in New Russia. A study of their settlement and economic development from 1789–1914,” PhD dissertation, Stanford University, 1933, 179, https://archive.org/details/themennonitecoloniesinnewrussiaastudyoftheirsettlementandeconomicdevelopmentfrom1789to1914ocr. On the crisis, see previous post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/landless-crisis-molotschna-1840s-to.html.

Note 3: Peter J. Braun, Der Molotschnaer Mennoniten-Schulrat, 1869–1919. Zum Gedenktag seines 50jährigen Bestehens, edited by Wladimir Süss (Göttingen: Göttinger Arbeitskreis, 2001). See English summary in idem, “The Educational System of the Mennonite Colonies in South Russia,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 3, no. 3 (July 1929), 169–182. On the archive’s origins, loss, rediscovery and contents, see: Ingrid I. Epp, and Harvey L. Dyck, The Peter J. Braun Russian Mennonite Archive, 1803–1920: A Research Guide (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996), https://www.mharchives.ca/holdings/papers/pdfs/PJBRussMennArchiveFA2.pdf.

Note 4: Peter J. Braun to [brother] Abram J. Braun, November 16, 1932, 1f., in Mennonite Library and Archives, Newton, KS, MS 91, Folder 4. https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_91/folder_4/SKMBT_C35107121310570_0001.jpg, AND https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_91/folder_4/SKMBT_C35107121310570_0002.jpg.

Note 5: David G. Rempel, “Disunity and schisms in the Mennonite Church ca. 1789 -1870,” 2. Unpublished typed manuscript from David G. Rempel Collection, Box 39: 20, Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library, University of Toronto.

Note 6: P. Braun to A. Braun, November 16, 1932.

Note 7: Bernhard Harder, “Die Moralität der hiesigen Bewohner,” December 27, 1856, in Peter J. Braun Russian Mennonite Archive, reel 52, file 1820. From Robarts Library, University of Toronto. For a biography of Harder, cf. Cornelius Krahn, “Harder, Bernhard (1832-1884),” GAMEO, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Harder,_Bernhard_(1832-1884); and Gerhard Harder, “Mittheilungen aus dem Lebensgange des Verfassers,” in B. Harder, Geistliche Lieder, volume 1,VIII-XXIV. Bernhard Harder’s hymns and poems were collected after his death and published by Heinrich Franz, Geistliche Lieder und Gelegenheitsgedichte von Bernhard Harder, 2 volumes (Hamburg: A-G, 1888), vol 1: https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Pis/Hard1.pdf; vol. 2: https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Pis/Hard2.pdf. See also a posthumously published sermon by Harder: “Eine Predigt vom seligen Prediger und Dichter Bernhard Harder,” Mennonitisches Jahrbuch 1908 6 (1909), 57–66, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/kb/mj1908.pdf.

Note 8: Peter Isaac, A Family Book from 1694 to 1916 and Personal Experiences (Rosenort, MB: 1980), 47. Isaac (of the Kleine Gemeinde) adds: “Apparently, this is a rare occurrence. I take for granted that their village thought very highly of him.”

Note 9: Peter M. Friesen, Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia (1789-1910), 2nd ed. (Fresno, CA: Christian Literature Mennonite Brethren Churches, 1980), 1034, fn. 31; 781, https://archive.org/details/TheMennoniteBrotherhoodInRussia17891910/. In 1830 the head of the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Settlers, Andrei Fadeev, recognized Bräul as one of only eight teachers out of 116 in Katerynoslav and Tauria fit to teach (notably he also taught Russian) See Friesen, Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia, 780f.; and Detlef Brandes, “German Colonists in Southern Ukraine up to the Repeal of the Colonial Statute,” in German-Ukrainian Relations in Historical Perspective, edited by H.-J. Torke and J.-P. Himka (Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, 1994), 20, https://archive.org/details/germanukrainianr0000unse/page/10/mode/2up.

Note 10: In 1867 miller and one-time Rudnerweide resident Heinrich Görz reminded his son—an aspiring teacher—of the “scandalous” situation of Mennonite teachers in general. He gives us a sample of comparative wages and a glimpse of Jacob Bräul’s poverty in retirement. See Heinrich Goerz, in John B. Toews, “Cultural and Intellectual Aspects of the Mennonite Experience in Russia,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 53, no. 2 (1979) 137–159; 146f.

Note 11: Bernhard Harder, “Die Moralität der hiesigen Bewohner.” December 27, 1856. From Peter J. Braun Russian Mennonite Archive, file 1820, reel 52. From Robarts Library, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Note 12: Jacob Bräul, “Die Moralität der hiesigen Bewohner,” December 20, 1856, in Peter J. Braun Russian Mennonite Archive, file 1820, reel 52. From Robarts Library, University of Toronto.

Note 13: Mennonitische Blätter 10, no. 1 (February 1863), 15, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1854-1900/1863/DSCF0285.JPG (see also bottom of 15, top of 16; Harder is a contributor to that piece as well). See Franz Isaac, Die Molotschnaer Mennoniten. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte derselben (Halbstadt, Taurien: H. J. Braun, 1908), https://archive.org/details/die-molotschnaer-mennoniten-editablea. English translation by Tim Flaming and Glenn Penner: https://www.mharchives.ca/download/3573/.

Note 14: Rempel, “Mennonite Colonies in New Russia,” 187.

Note 15: Jacob Unruh, cited in James Urry and Lawrence Klippenstein, “Mennonites and the Crimean War, 1854–1856,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 7 (1989), 18, https://jms.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/jms/article/view/748/747. See also previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/mennonites-and-crimean-war-1853-56.html.

Note 16: Krahn, “Harder, Bernhard.” Bräul’s grandson (b. 1854) continued his grandfather’s and father's legacy as a noted educator in Molotschna; GAMEO, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Br%C3%A4ul,_Johann_J._(1854-1916).

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Moral Condition of Molotschna: Teacher Reports, 1856," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), November 11, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/moral-condition-of-molotschna-teacher.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß";  note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...