Skip to main content

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not.

Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern, which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and:

"…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and also broke a bottle and a glass. With the assistance of other clients, Wiens found it necessary to remove these trouble-makers from the premises. They refused, however, to settle down but rushed back into the tavern where they beat Wiens. With the help of other individuals, he removed them from the building a second time, and when they still refused to stop their violent behaviour, the Village Office found it necessary to arrest them and put them under guard." (Note 1).

Once Reimer and Friesen had admitted their guilt to the District Office ten days later, the matter was transferred “to the honourable church teachers [ministers] to take appropriate action.”

Petty crimes could be punished with twenty lashes: “In this month in Einlage [Chortitza] four delinquents were thoroughly thrashed with 20 blows each, namely Peter Dyck, Abraham Wiebe … ” (note 2).

And sins of greater consequence including “debts, drunkenness, bad housekeeping, and an unregulated way of life” could be cause for losing one’s property within the model colony—as was the case in other German colonies as well (note 3).

Incest and rape carried a more severe, state-imposed punishment: 60 lashes with a birch switch, two-years hard-labour, and surveillance at home after release (note 4).

However, between 1816 and 1819, a minister who “forcibly committed his shame [with a woman] on the open steppes” was simply removed from his ministerial position, “as they did not know what else they could do,” and he was placed “under the ban for three or four days” (note 5). The rapist, Cornelius Janzen, was a minister of the Large Flemish, though he was with the Kleine Gemeinde.

Chortitza minister David Epp is most explicit. "Immorality seems to have the upper hand. ... Higher authorities wish to curb the immoral lifestyle in the congregations. The district books are to be circulated, the names of immoral members entered and their transgressions as well as punishments listed" (note 6).

In 1841, Epp notes that the first case of infanticide amongst Mennonites was uncovered in the Bergthal Colony. Elders properly reported this to authorities. July 2, 1841: “The daughter of Cornelius Friesen had an affair with the young man Siemens and gave birth to a child. It was murdered and found dead on the manure pile. … How horrible!” (note 7).

The same year in Altonau, Molotschna, a widow Thiessen’s was the victim of an arsonist, resulting in the loss of all her cattle and many goods; the fire was set at 1 AM by her apprentice miller, the Mennonite Peter Giesbrecht, who then shot himself in the mill (note 8).

On the shared Mennonite-Jewish Colony Judenplan, the Mennonite mayor Heinrich Goerz was accused of beating and then killing a Jewish man; complaints were also made against his successor Jacob Dyck for temper and the use of corporal punishment (note 9).    

Sometimes archival information can ruin a family or church narrative. In 1996, William Schroeder offered a history of his ancestor Johann Schroeder (1807-1884). He mentions that Johann's father was stabbed to death in 1826 in an attempt "to settle a dispute in the village beer parlour" (note 10). Apparently he was a night watchman. Perhaps.

Schroeder referenced early Mennonite Brethren historian P. M. Friesen, who in turn cites Peter Hildebrand—a Frisian church elder and original setter:

“In his little booklet … Hildebrand also recounts many sad episodes in the moral life of the young colony. In one village the Mennonite settlers built themselves a tavern where they, in a drunken stupor, committed a murder. All of this tends to disillusion the reader, especially when he … recalls Menno Simon’s [writings] … and the chapter on the martyrs” (Note 11).

For Friesen, this was a clear indictment of the larger church and its ineffective church discipline—especially in the early years.

But the longer story of Johann Schroeder Sr. is much more interesting—and troubling—than P. M. Friesen knew or cared to record.

In recent years we have fuller access to Guardianship Committee minutes on Mennonite petitions, cases and reports. Glenn Penner has translated a few of the reports by Chortitza District Mayor Peter Siemens regarding Johann Schroeder, 1812-14 (note 12).

What do they show? In 1812, church and district leaders as well as the Guardianship Committee investigated a possible murder—the suspicious suicide-hanging of Katharina Kasdorf Schroeder of Kronsthal, the wife of Johann Schroeder. Not only did Schroeder marry the family’s much younger maid Katharina Olfert “almost immediately” after the hanging, but Schroeder admitted “at times to having agitated and offended" his first wife.

When Schroeder and his maid were questioned about “their unbecoming behaviour towards the unfortunate woman,” both “screamed like mad animals against the District Council as well as the [church] elders, charging them with wanting to ruin their lives. Because of their gross behaviour, they were banned from the church" (note 13).

The two were incarcerated until the Guardianship Committee acquitted them. Yet within a year they—with a neighbour—plotted the assault and battery of fellow church member Martin Siemens. According to district reports,

"Schroeder and his Katharina [Olfert] and Balman [=Bannman] used trickery to invite [Martin] Siemens to Schroeder’s house for a friendly visit. Upon entering he was hit on the head with a fist by Schroeder and Balman caught him by the feet and they dragged him into the shed. This was where Schroeder’s [first] wife, Katharina [Kasdorf], hanged herself. They hit Siemens so hard that … it was feared he would die." (Note 14)

Surprisingly the District Office petitioned the Guardianship Committee to release Schroeder and his accomplice “as soon as possible, with the promise that they do not repeat these evil acts and after this behave as good and honest men towards all" (note 15).

The two accused gave notice that they were “heartily sorry for the beating of Martin Siemens” and that they “shall not commit such evils anymore, but will use all our strength in being peaceful and diligent householders for the rest of our lives” (note 16).

A decade later Schroeder was stabbed to death in the context of a village beer parlour dispute.

He died as violently as he had lived.

Archival sources for outliers like Johann Schroeder and the others above will enrich Mennonite community stories—even when the next generations do not like what they find. They display well how the community functioned as a whole—and that also makes these stories important, even if we might wish to disown those involved.

As noted at the outset, it is not hard to document the good, peaceful holy virtues of the Mennonites in Russia. But as James Urry aptly suggests, the “None but Saints” view (note 17) of this people and the white-washing of its history make the whole inauthentic and unbelievable. Only when we are honest with the past do we find real communities like our own who perhaps have some wisdom to offer.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: “No. 475: District Office to Johann Cornies, 26 January 1835,” in Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe. Letters and Papers of Johann Cornies, vol. 1: 1812–1835, translated by Ingrid I. Epp; edited by Harvey L. Dyck, Ingrid I. Epp, and John R. Staples (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015), 404.

Note 2: Tagebuch von Jakob Wall 1824–1859, part I, https://chortitza.org/Eich/WallOr1.htm.

Note 3: See case of Mennonite Dirk Thun of Fürstenwerder, “Guardianship Committee of Foreign Settlers in South Russia,” Inventory 3, File 15348. Odessa Region State Archives Fond 6. From Mennonite Heritage Centre, Winnipeg, http://www.mennonitechurch.ca/programs/archives/holdings/organizations/OdessaArchivesF6.htm.

Note 4: Ibid., Inventory 2, File 9664, 1847; case of Mennonite man who had impregnated his daughter-in-law.

Note 5: Cited in Delbert Plett, Golden Years: The Mennonite Kleine Gemeinde in Russia (1812–1849) (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1985), 184, https://www.mharchives.ca/download/1216/.

Note 6: Diaries of David Epp: 1837–1843, translated and edited by John B. Toews (Vancouver, BC: Regent College, 2000), 165f. (Google book link).

Note 7: D. Epp, Diaries of David Epp: 1837–1843, 157 (Google book link).

Note 8: Tagebuch von Jakob Wall 1824–1859, Part II, March 29, 1841, https://chortitza.org/Eich/WallOr2.htm.

Note 9: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/the-jewish-colony-judenplan-and-its.html.

Note 10: William Schroeder, “Johann Schroeder (1807–1884),” Preservings 8.2 (June 1996). 44–47, https://www.plettfoundation.org/preservings/archive/8-2/.

Note 10: Cf. Peter M. Friesen, The Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia 1789–1910 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978), 114, https://archive.org/details/TheMennoniteBrotherhoodInRussia17891910/page/n155/mode/2up (German p. 98: https://chortitza.org/pdf/pmfries1.pdf). See also Peter Hildebrand, Erste Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus dem Danziger Gebiet nach Südrußland (Halbstadt: Neufeld, 1888), 80, https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01004497897#?page=80.

Note 11: Glenn Penner, “The Bergthal Colony Schroeders, Part II,” Heritage Posting: Manitoba Mennonite Historical Society 48 (April 2005), 6–9, https://mmhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Heritage-Posting-no.-48.pdf. Penner's source: Odessa State Regional Archives Fond 6, Inventory 1, file 711, https://www.mharchives.ca/holdings/organizations/OdessaArchiveF6/F6-1.htm.

Note 12: Peter Siemens, “Report I, Chortitza Colony Gebiets-Vorsteher [District Mayor] to the Guardianship Department” (no. 142, November 19, 1812), in Penner, “Bergthal Colony Schroeders," 7; translation slightly altered.

Note 13: P. Siemens, “Report I, Chortitza Colony Gebiets-Vorsteher to the Guardianship Department” (no. 8, January 10, 1814), in Penner, “Bergthal Colony Schroeders," 8.

Note 14: P. Siemens, "Report III, February 16, 1814," Chortitza Colony Gebiets-Vorsteher to the Guardianship Department,” in Penner, “Bergthal Colony Schroeders," 8.

Note 15: P. Siemens, "Report IV, June 6, 1814" (with signed confession /petition by J. Schroeder), Chortitza Colony Gebiets-Vorsteher to the Guardianship Department” (no. 8, February 1814), in Penner, “Bergthal Colony Schroeders," 9.

Note 16: See James Urry, “None but Saints”: The Transformation of Mennonite Life in Russia, 1789–1889 (Winnipeg, MB: Hyperion, 1989).

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "High Crimes and Misdimeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), November 19, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/high-crimes-and-misdemeanors-mennonite.html.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Landless Crisis: Molotschna, 1840s to 1860s

The landless crisis in the mid-1800s in the Molotschna Colony is the context for most other matters of importance to its Mennonites, 1840s to 1860s. When discussing landlessness, historian David G. Rempel has claimed that the “seemingly endemic wranglings and splits” of the Mennonite church in South Russia were only seldom or superficially related to doctrine, and “almost invariably and intimately bound up with some of the most serious social and economic issues” that afflicted one or more of the congregations in the settlement ( note 1 ). It is important from the start to recognize that these Mennonites were not citizens,  but foreign colonists with obligations and privileges that governed their sojourn in New Russia. For Mennonites the privileges, e.g. of land and freedom from military conscription, were connected to the obligation of model farming. Mennonites were given one, and then later two districts of land for this purpose. Within their districts or colonies , villages w...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...

The Flight to Moscow 1929

In 1926, my grandfather’s sister Justina Fast (b. 1896) and her husband Peter Görzen moved from Krassikow, Neu Samara (Soviet Union) to village no. 5 Dejewka, Orenburg. “We thought we would live our lives here with our children secure in the hands of God. But the times were becoming turbulent,” Justina recalled. In May 1929 they travelled back to Krassikow for Pentecost to visit with her mother, brothers and their families. But when they returned to their home, she writes, “… a large quota of grain was demanded of us. But we had nothing, and the harvest was not yet in. Then we heard that many were planning to move to Canada, including my three siblings with my mother, and my husband's three sisters too. My husband decided to go to Moscow first to see if it was possible and what was required for emigration. We made the decision to leave when the harvest was complete. At that time so many people were leaving [for Moscow], and early in September we sold everything we had. Only the b...

Immigration to Canada, 1923: Background

In April 1921 Mennonites in the Caucasus and Don Region officially petitioned Moscow for permissions to emigrate—which Lenin had “flatly refused.” Their rationale was more than economic. “The disruption of economic conditions leads to impoverishment, which again goes hand in hand with the degradation of morals and has an alarming impact on our youth, who are also constantly exposed to the pressure of brutal and ruthless agitation on the part of those in power. … This decay of our spiritual and economic goods will only become greater and more ruinous.” ( Note 1 ) Later that year and some months before the large-scale feeding operations could begin in the Soviet Union, American Mennonite Relief (AMR) commissioner A.J. Miller petitioned the Soviet Embassy in London for exit permissions for 20,000 Mennonites ( note 1b) . He was unsuccessful. Nonetheless in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, key Mennonite leaders took a decision to work toward the re...