Skip to main content

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not.

Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern, which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and:

"…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and also broke a bottle and a glass. With the assistance of other clients, Wiens found it necessary to remove these trouble-makers from the premises. They refused, however, to settle down but rushed back into the tavern where they beat Wiens. With the help of other individuals, he removed them from the building a second time, and when they still refused to stop their violent behaviour, the Village Office found it necessary to arrest them and put them under guard." (Note 1).

Once Reimer and Friesen had admitted their guilt to the District Office ten days later, the matter was transferred “to the honourable church teachers [ministers] to take appropriate action.”

Petty crimes could be punished with twenty lashes: “In this month in Einlage [Chortitza] four delinquents were thoroughly thrashed with 20 blows each, namely Peter Dyck, Abraham Wiebe … ” (note 2).

And sins of greater consequence including “debts, drunkenness, bad housekeeping, and an unregulated way of life” could be cause for losing one’s property within the model colony—as was the case in other German colonies as well (note 3).

Incest and rape carried a more severe, state-imposed punishment: 60 lashes with a birch switch, two-years hard-labour, and surveillance at home after release (note 4).

However, between 1816 and 1819, a minister who “forcibly committed his shame [with a woman] on the open steppes” was simply removed from his ministerial position, “as they did not know what else they could do,” and he was placed “under the ban for three or four days” (note 5). The rapist, Cornelius Janzen, was a minister of the Large Flemish, though he was with the Kleine Gemeinde.

Chortitza minister David Epp is most explicit. "Immorality seems to have the upper hand. ... Higher authorities wish to curb the immoral lifestyle in the congregations. The district books are to be circulated, the names of immoral members entered and their transgressions as well as punishments listed" (note 6).

In 1841, Epp notes that the first case of infanticide amongst Mennonites was uncovered in the Bergthal Colony. Elders properly reported this to authorities. July 2, 1841: “The daughter of Cornelius Friesen had an affair with the young man Siemens and gave birth to a child. It was murdered and found dead on the manure pile. … How horrible!” (note 7).

The same year in Altonau, Molotschna, a widow Thiessen’s was the victim of an arsonist, resulting in the loss of all her cattle and many goods; the fire was set at 1 AM by her apprentice miller, the Mennonite Peter Giesbrecht, who then shot himself in the mill (note 8).

On the shared Mennonite-Jewish Colony Judenplan, the Mennonite mayor Heinrich Goerz was accused of beating and then killing a Jewish man; complaints were also made against his successor Jacob Dyck for temper and the use of corporal punishment (note 9).    

Sometimes archival information can ruin a family or church narrative. In 1996, William Schroeder offered a history of his ancestor Johann Schroeder (1807-1884). He mentions that Johann's father was stabbed to death in 1826 in an attempt "to settle a dispute in the village beer parlour" (note 10). Apparently he was a night watchman. Perhaps.

Schroeder referenced early Mennonite Brethren historian P. M. Friesen, who in turn cites Peter Hildebrand—a Frisian church elder and original setter:

“In his little booklet … Hildebrand also recounts many sad episodes in the moral life of the young colony. In one village the Mennonite settlers built themselves a tavern where they, in a drunken stupor, committed a murder. All of this tends to disillusion the reader, especially when he … recalls Menno Simon’s [writings] … and the chapter on the martyrs” (Note 11).

For Friesen, this was a clear indictment of the larger church and its ineffective church discipline—especially in the early years.

But the longer story of Johann Schroeder Sr. is much more interesting—and troubling—than P. M. Friesen knew or cared to record.

In recent years we have fuller access to Guardianship Committee minutes on Mennonite petitions, cases and reports. Glenn Penner has translated a few of the reports by Chortitza District Mayor Peter Siemens regarding Johann Schroeder, 1812-14 (note 12).

What do they show? In 1812, church and district leaders as well as the Guardianship Committee investigated a possible murder—the suspicious suicide-hanging of Katharina Kasdorf Schroeder of Kronsthal, the wife of Johann Schroeder. Not only did Schroeder marry the family’s much younger maid Katharina Olfert “almost immediately” after the hanging, but Schroeder admitted “at times to having agitated and offended" his first wife.

When Schroeder and his maid were questioned about “their unbecoming behaviour towards the unfortunate woman,” both “screamed like mad animals against the District Council as well as the [church] elders, charging them with wanting to ruin their lives. Because of their gross behaviour, they were banned from the church" (note 13).

The two were incarcerated until the Guardianship Committee acquitted them. Yet within a year they—with a neighbour—plotted the assault and battery of fellow church member Martin Siemens. According to district reports,

"Schroeder and his Katharina [Olfert] and Balman [=Bannman] used trickery to invite [Martin] Siemens to Schroeder’s house for a friendly visit. Upon entering he was hit on the head with a fist by Schroeder and Balman caught him by the feet and they dragged him into the shed. This was where Schroeder’s [first] wife, Katharina [Kasdorf], hanged herself. They hit Siemens so hard that … it was feared he would die." (Note 14)

Surprisingly the District Office petitioned the Guardianship Committee to release Schroeder and his accomplice “as soon as possible, with the promise that they do not repeat these evil acts and after this behave as good and honest men towards all" (note 15).

The two accused gave notice that they were “heartily sorry for the beating of Martin Siemens” and that they “shall not commit such evils anymore, but will use all our strength in being peaceful and diligent householders for the rest of our lives” (note 16).

A decade later Schroeder was stabbed to death in the context of a village beer parlour dispute.

He died as violently as he had lived.

Archival sources for outliers like Johann Schroeder and the others above will enrich Mennonite community stories—even when the next generations do not like what they find. They display well how the community functioned as a whole—and that also makes these stories important, even if we might wish to disown those involved.

As noted at the outset, it is not hard to document the good, peaceful holy virtues of the Mennonites in Russia. But as James Urry aptly suggests, the “None but Saints” view (note 17) of this people and the white-washing of its history make the whole inauthentic and unbelievable. Only when we are honest with the past do we find real communities like our own who perhaps have some wisdom to offer.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: “No. 475: District Office to Johann Cornies, 26 January 1835,” in Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe. Letters and Papers of Johann Cornies, vol. 1: 1812–1835, translated by Ingrid I. Epp; edited by Harvey L. Dyck, Ingrid I. Epp, and John R. Staples (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015), 404.

Note 2: Tagebuch von Jakob Wall 1824–1859, part I, https://chortitza.org/Eich/WallOr1.htm.

Note 3: See case of Mennonite Dirk Thun of Fürstenwerder, “Guardianship Committee of Foreign Settlers in South Russia,” Inventory 3, File 15348. Odessa Region State Archives Fond 6. From Mennonite Heritage Centre, Winnipeg, http://www.mennonitechurch.ca/programs/archives/holdings/organizations/OdessaArchivesF6.htm.

Note 4: Ibid., Inventory 2, File 9664, 1847; case of Mennonite man who had impregnated his daughter-in-law.

Note 5: Cited in Delbert Plett, Golden Years: The Mennonite Kleine Gemeinde in Russia (1812–1849) (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1985), 184, https://www.mharchives.ca/download/1216/.

Note 6: Diaries of David Epp: 1837–1843, translated and edited by John B. Toews (Vancouver, BC: Regent College, 2000), 165f. (Google book link).

Note 7: D. Epp, Diaries of David Epp: 1837–1843, 157 (Google book link).

Note 8: Tagebuch von Jakob Wall 1824–1859, Part II, March 29, 1841, https://chortitza.org/Eich/WallOr2.htm.

Note 9: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/the-jewish-colony-judenplan-and-its.html.

Note 10: William Schroeder, “Johann Schroeder (1807–1884),” Preservings 8.2 (June 1996). 44–47, https://www.plettfoundation.org/preservings/archive/8-2/.

Note 10: Cf. Peter M. Friesen, The Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia 1789–1910 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978), 114, https://archive.org/details/TheMennoniteBrotherhoodInRussia17891910/page/n155/mode/2up (German p. 98: https://chortitza.org/pdf/pmfries1.pdf). See also Peter Hildebrand, Erste Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus dem Danziger Gebiet nach Südrußland (Halbstadt: Neufeld, 1888), 80, https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01004497897#?page=80.

Note 11: Glenn Penner, “The Bergthal Colony Schroeders, Part II,” Heritage Posting: Manitoba Mennonite Historical Society 48 (April 2005), 6–9, https://mmhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Heritage-Posting-no.-48.pdf. Penner's source: Odessa State Regional Archives Fond 6, Inventory 1, file 711, https://www.mharchives.ca/holdings/organizations/OdessaArchiveF6/F6-1.htm.

Note 12: Peter Siemens, “Report I, Chortitza Colony Gebiets-Vorsteher [District Mayor] to the Guardianship Department” (no. 142, November 19, 1812), in Penner, “Bergthal Colony Schroeders," 7; translation slightly altered.

Note 13: P. Siemens, “Report I, Chortitza Colony Gebiets-Vorsteher to the Guardianship Department” (no. 8, January 10, 1814), in Penner, “Bergthal Colony Schroeders," 8.

Note 14: P. Siemens, "Report III, February 16, 1814," Chortitza Colony Gebiets-Vorsteher to the Guardianship Department,” in Penner, “Bergthal Colony Schroeders," 8.

Note 15: P. Siemens, "Report IV, June 6, 1814" (with signed confession /petition by J. Schroeder), Chortitza Colony Gebiets-Vorsteher to the Guardianship Department” (no. 8, February 1814), in Penner, “Bergthal Colony Schroeders," 9.

Note 16: See James Urry, “None but Saints”: The Transformation of Mennonite Life in Russia, 1789–1889 (Winnipeg, MB: Hyperion, 1989).

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "High Crimes and Misdimeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), November 19, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/high-crimes-and-misdemeanors-mennonite.html.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Church to Say? Letter 1 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accuarte and carefully considered. ~ANF American Mennonite leaders who supported Trump will be responding to the election results in the near future. Sometimes a template or sample conference address helps to formulate one’s own text. To that end I offer the following. When Hitler came to power in 1933, Mennonites in Germany sent official greetings by telegram: “The Conference of the East and West Prussian Mennonites meeting today at Tiegenhagen in the Free City of Danzig are deeply grateful for the tremendous uprising ( Erhebung ) that God has given our people ( Volk ) through the vigor and action of [unclear], and promise our cooperation in the construction of our Fatherland, true to the Gospel motto of [our founder Menno Simons], ‘For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.’” ( Note 1 ) Hitler responded in a letter...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 2 of 4 to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF In a few short months the American government will start to fulfill its campaign promises to round up and deport undocumented immigrants. The responsible cabinet members have already been appointed. By early Spring 2025, Mennonite pastors/leaders who supported Trump will need to speak to and address the matter in their congregations. It will be difficult to find words. How might they prepare? Sometimes a template from the past is helpful. To that end, I offer my summary of a text by retired Mennonite pastor and conference leader Gustav Kraemer. (There is a nice entry on him in the Mennonite Encyclopedia,  GAMEO ). My summary is faithful to the German original, 1938. With only a few minor changes, it could be useful for the coming year. Adaptations are mostly in square brackets, with the key at the bottom of the post. ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...

The Flight to Moscow 1929

In 1926, my grandfather’s sister Justina Fast (b. 1896) and her husband Peter Görzen moved from Krassikow, Neu Samara (Soviet Union) to village no. 5 Dejewka, Orenburg. “We thought we would live our lives here with our children secure in the hands of God. But the times were becoming turbulent,” Justina recalled. In May 1929 they travelled back to Krassikow for Pentecost to visit with her mother, brothers and their families. But when they returned to their home, she writes, “… a large quota of grain was demanded of us. But we had nothing, and the harvest was not yet in. Then we heard that many were planning to move to Canada, including my three siblings with my mother, and my husband's three sisters too. My husband decided to go to Moscow first to see if it was possible and what was required for emigration. We made the decision to leave when the harvest was complete. At that time so many people were leaving [for Moscow], and early in September we sold everything we had. Only the b...

Simple Refugee Wedding: My grandparents (1931)

My father was born less than a year after these 1931 wedding photos. Jacob Fast and Helen Janzen had been in Paraguay less than 8 months—see the MCC telegram—and tragedy had already struck both refugees families. Jacob’s first wife and a daughter became victims of the epidemic that ravaged the new colony of Fernheim in those first months. He was now a widower at age 39—with an infant and other children without a mother. Helene was single and 29 years old. Her mother too had died from the same epidemic; her father was partially crippled. They had come from southern Ukrainian community of Spat, Crimea; Fast was from Ural Mountains area in Russia where South Russian Mennonites had created a “daughter colony” a generation earlier.   Each had siblings who fled to Moscow in 1929 with them and who were accepted by Canada in 1930. My grandparents however were rejected—she was a single woman with frail parents; he was a man with an ill child. Perhaps in contexts like these the falli...

What does it cost to settle a Refugee? Basic without Medical Care (1930)

In January 1930, the Mennonite Central Committee was scrambling to get 3,885 Mennonites out of Germany and settled somewhere fast. These refugees had fled via Moscow in December 1929, and Germany was willing only to serve as first transit stop ( note 1 ). Canada was very reluctant to take any German-speaking Mennonites—the Great Depression had begun and a negative memory of war resistance still lingered. In the end Canada took 1,344 Mennonites and the USA took none born in Russia. Paraguay was the next best option ( note 2 ). The German government preferred Brazil, but Brazil would not guarantee freedom from military service, which was a problem for American Mennonite financiers. There were already some conservative "cousins" from Manitoba in Paraguay who had negotiated with the government and learned through trial and error how to survive in the "Green Hell" of the Paraguayan Chaco. MCC with the assistance of a German aid organization purchased and distribute...

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the ...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...