The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible.

But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods (note 1). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” (note 2).

At least since the early 1820s Mennonites had supported Moravian and Pietist missionaries to Jews in New Russia, as well as the missionary work of Johann C. Moritz—a convert from Judaism (note 3). In 1830 a law was passed in Bessarabia (near the Crimean Peninsula) that offered Jews freedom from any taxes or benefits throughout life if they converted to Christianity (note 4).

In 1836, landless Chortitza Mennonites began to settle the so-called “Jewish steppe” to form the Mariupoler Mennonite Bergthal district. These lands had been set aside in 1817 for distribution and settlement of urban Jews, and specifically for members of the Society of Israeli Christians—an association organized by Prince Alexander Golitsyn, Minister of Foreign Creeds. Because the Society had so few members, the lands remained largely unsettled and the state eventually abandoned its plans (note 5).

Prejudice towards Jews was shared broadly in Russian society. The Russian Ministry for the Interior—which was dissatisfied with the growing poverty of the Jewish agricultural colonies—drew up plans for retraining its Jewish farming population, and placing all of these colonies under the oversight of the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Settlers. About 20 percent of Jews in New Russia lived in agricultural colonies; many had been removed from Jewish ghettos a few decades earlier.

In 1847 Johann Cornies was appointed by the Guardianship Committee to oversee the six-village experimental settlement known as the Judenplan. The plan was to attract “model” Mennonite farmers and village administrators, with special privileges and incentives—including land. Scores of Jewish homes stood empty as families had given up on agriculture and migrated back to the cities. Mennonites acquired these farms for minimal contributions to the Guardianship Committee. Approximately 100 to 140 qualified Mennonite families participated in this program.

The overseers were Mennonite—typically not respected by their Jewish underlings, and with little authority to carry out their mandate. While some agricultural change can be documented, the results were less than successful and included some terrible conflicts. For example, a Mennonite mayor in the Judenplan, Heinrich Goerz, was accused of beating and killing a Jewish man, and complaints were issued against a successor, Jacob Dyck, for temper and the use of corporal punishment (note 6).

On occasion legal disputes occurred between Jews and Mennonite service providers outside of the Judenplan as well (note 7). In these relations there was mistrust, and that distance grew as Mennonites’ economic competencies diversified and the need for Jewish middle-men lessened. Often the petitions by German colonists to the Guardianship Committee about Jews were in fact a strategy to deal with “annoying competition” (note 8).

The Judenplan vision established in part by Cornies came with good intentions. But it was paternalistic from the start, ensuring that the two communities would not relate as neighbours.

And not surprisingly, competing notions of divine mission were at play—Jewish, Mennonite and Russian. The notion of “model farmers”—so central to Mennonite identity in Russia—was a contradiction in terms for some local Jewish Rabbis, who sought to convince “simple settlers that the Chosen People of the Jews was not destined for agriculture—this was the bitter lot of the Goyim, the other-believers” (note 9)!

In the coming years the Jewish community would suffer violent attack in South Russia. In May 1881 thousands of Jews in the Berdjansk district were chased from their homes, beaten and robbed. Some fled to the Mennonite villages for protection. In the Molotschna Colony, “Russian lads” in Rudnerweide attacked the Jewish craftsmen who were there on Sundays, and in Tiegerweide “Russian servants” beat the local Jews badly. Some Jews from Tokmak found refuge in Fürstenau, though its residents were warned not to provide shelter (note 10).

"Until now [1882] it appeared that in Russia Jews could find protection with German colonists from the raw persecution of Russians. This came naturally to us [Mennonites], for in our view it is not impossible that hatred could be stirred up against Germans as well. … 'Do unto others what you would have them do to you.' But now it is clear that this type of sympathy with Jews also incites the hatred of the country’s population against Germans." (Note 11)

But even in this case, the unnamed Mennonite correspondent continued the column with his own hateful language against these “lost sheep from the House of Israel.”

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Painting by Mykola Pymonenko, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Russia#/media/File:Pimonenko._Victime_of_fanatisme.jpg.

Note 1: Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004), 106.

Note 2: “Inspektor Artillerie Kapitän Kotowirsch, an die Gebietsämter von Klöstitz, Malojaroslawetz und Sarata” (March 3, 1836). No. 279, Folder 18. Letter (copied). Benjamin H. Unruh collection, Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University. From Mennonite Library and Archives-Bethel College, MS. 295, folder 14, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_295/folder_14/SKMBT_C35107061313230_0034.jpg.

Note 3: James Urry, “‘Servants from far’: Mennonites and the pan-evangelical impulse in early nineteenth-century Russia,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 61, no. 2 (1987), 219.

Note 4: See https://jewinthepew.org/2015/11/28/28-november-1830-grotesque-russification-conversion-law-offers-financial-inducements-otdimjh.

Note 5: Dimitry Z. Feldman, “Archival Sources for the Genealogy of Jewish Colonists in Southern Russia in the 19th Century,” in RAGAS Newsletter 5, no. 1 (Spring 1999), https://kehilalinks.jewishgen.org/colonies_of_ukraine/archival_sources_for_the_genealo.htm; Johann Cornies, “No. 186, Cornies to Andrei M. Fadeev, March 12, 1830,” Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe: Letters and Papers of Johann Cornies, vol. 1: 1812–1835, translated by Ingrid I. Epp; edited by Harvey L. Dyck, Ingrid I. Epp, and John R. Staples (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015), 166f.; Jakob Stach, ed., Grunau und die Mariupoler Kolonien (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1942), V–VI;191, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Buch/Grunau.pdf.

Note 6: Harvey Dyck, “Landlessness in the Old Colony: The Judenplan Experiment 1850–1880,” in Mennonites in Russia, edited by John Friesen (Winnipeg, MB: CMBC, 1989), 197. See also George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten in Rußland, vol. 3 (Lage: Logos, 2003), 214. Corporal punishment was used on Jewish underlings in other non-Mennonite, German-run colonies (Dmytro Myeshkov, Schawarzmeerdeutschen und ihre Welten: 1781–1871 [Essen: Klartext, 2008], 337).

Note 7: “Guardianship Committee of Foreign Settlers in South Russia,” Inventory 2, file 12301, 1849 to 1866; Inventory 3, file 15107; also files 15165, 1852 to 1854; Inventory 4b, file 21683, 1863, regarding quality of flour received from Mennonite mill in Waldheim. Fond 6. From Mennonite Heritage Centre, Winnipeg, MB, https://www.mennonitechurch.ca/programs/archives/holdings/organizations/OdessaArchivesF6.htm.

Note 8: Cf. 1865 report cited in Myeshkov, Die Schawarzmeerdeutschen und ihre Welten, 452.

Note 9: Cited in Myeshkov, Die Schawarzmeerdeutschen und ihre Welten, 343.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), November 11, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/the-jewish-colony-judenplan-and-its.html.

Comments

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

A Mennonite Pandemic Spirituality, 1830-1831

Asiatic Cholera broke out across Russia in 1829 and ‘30, and further into Europe in 1831. It began with an infected battalion in Orenburg ( note 1 ), and by early Fall 1830 the disease had reached Moscow and the capital. Russia imposed drastic quarantine measures. Much like today, infected regions were cut off and domestic trade was restricted. The disease reached the Molotschna River district in Fall 1830, and by mid-December hundreds of Nogai deaths were recorded in the villages adjacent to the Mennonite colony, leading state authorities to impose a strict quarantine. When the Mennonite Johann Cornies—a state-appointed agricultural supervisor and civic leader—first became aware of the nearby cholera-related deaths, he recommended to the Mennonite District Office on December 6, 1830 to stop traffic and prevent random contacts with Nogai. For Cornies it was important that the Mennonite community do all it can keep from carrying the disease into the community, though “only God knows...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia: “We cordially plead ...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

"In the Case of Extreme Danger" - Menno Pass and Refugee crisis, 1945-46

"In the Case of Extreme Danger 1. We are Russian-Mennonite refugees who are returning to Holland, the place of origin. The language is Low German. 2. The Dutch Mennonites there, Doopsgezinde , will take in all fellow-believing Mennonites from Russia who are in danger of compulsory repatriation. 3. The first stage of the journey is to Gronau in Westphalia. 4. As a precaution, purchase a ticket to an intermediate stop first. The last connecting station is Rheine. 5. Opposite Gronau is the Dutch city of Enschede, where you will cross the border. 6. On the border ask for Peter Dyck (Piter Daik), Mennonite Central Committee, Amsterdam, Singel 452. Peter Dyck (or his people) will distribute the relevant papers—“Menno Passes”--and provide further information. 7. Any other border points may also be crossed, with the necessary explanations (who, where to, Mennonites from Russia, Peter Dyck, M.C.C., etc.). The Dutch border Patrol is informed. 8. Here the whole matter must be h...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog