Skip to main content

“Operation Chortitza” (Part II) – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44

Waldemar Janzen, my former German professor and advisee, turned eleven years old in 1943. He and his mother and 3,900 others from Chortitza and Rosenthal (Ukraine) were evacuated west to the ethnic German resettler camps in Gau Danzig-West Prussia in October that year (see Part I; note 1). Years later Janzen could still recall much from this childhood experience—including the impact of the visit by Professor Benjamin H. Unruh a few weeks after their arrival. “He was a man who had extended much help to his fellow Mennonites ever since they began to emigrate from Russia during the 1920s” (note 2). Unruh was a father-figure to his people, and his arrival at their camp in West Prussia signaled to the evacuees that they were in good hands (note 3). Unruh’s impact on 7,000 other Chortitza District villagers in Upper Silesia would be the same some weeks later (note 4).

Surprisingly Unruh’s West Prussian camps visit left an equally indelible impression on the Gau’s Operations Commander for Resettler Camps, SS-Hauptsturmführer Bösche and on his deputy SS-Untersturmführer Günther Fast.

In Bösche’s annual report on the camps some three months later (note 5), he underscored Unruh’s visit to “Chortitza-Germans in all the main camps” as a stirring and significant highlight. Events in Bösche’s camps in 1943 included:

  • 11 concerts with a total number of participants of 2,300;
  • 10 poetry evenings, 2,180 participants;
  • 28 political lectures, 5,160 participants (by Reich Propaganda Office and camp leaders);
  • 28 ceremonial events, 12,400 participants (Führer’s birthday; Fallen Heroes Day etc.);
  • 52 film screenings, 12,200 participants (“the ‘Newsreels’ gave the resettlers particular pleasure, because they often included segments that came from their immediate homeland”).

But none of the activities left the same impression as Unruh’s talks; the report mentions him three times by name.

Unruh sent a summary of his message to a senior officer of the Ethnic German Liaison Office (VoMi), SS-Obergruppenführer Dr. Gerhard Wolfrum (note 6)—tasked to assist Unruh “in all matters” (note 7)—who in turn reported to SS-Oberführer Horst Hoffmeyer (Sonderkommando R), who reported directly to Reichsführer-SS Himmler. Unruh was never reticent to remind SS leaders of his mandate: “It is a serious concern of mine, in the spirit of the discussions at the headquarters of the Reichsführer-SS (Himmler) and with the head of the Ethnic German Liaison Office, SS-Obergruppenführer Lorenz, to help expand the care of the ethnic Germans in and from the eastern region to the best of my ability and knowledge” (note 8).

Unruh’s address in each camp was introduced and framed by Bösche or Fast—an official regime blessing not lost on the resettlers. The latter were still traumatized and vulnerable and, as Unruh reported to Dr. Wolfrum, his goal was “to strengthen their trust in God, in the Führer, and in the Reichsführer-SS [Himmler]”—a surprisingly unorthodox trinity for a Mennonite salvation message.

Unruh sought to provide a path and give hope not only to his pious co-religionists, but also to the youth, convincing them to place their confidence and trust “in our Führer who has intervened to save you”—adding that it is nothing less than “the omnipotence and all-goodness of Providence itself which steers and strengthens his [Hitler’s] arm.” Providence is a term which Unruh’s Mennonites could connect to God’s care, provision, and guidance on their life journey. But it was also one of the “magic words in Nazi persuasion” (note 9) which Unruh deployed to the satisfaction of SS-leadership in the room. Like a Church father who offers a fresh expression of an ancient faith for believers and would-be believers alike, Unruh’s message resonated both with resettlers and SS-men who knew Hitler’s propensity to speak of providence in relation to himself.

Unruh lectured extemporaneously on the contrast between “life under Bolshevik terror and life under National Socialist leadership” (note 10). Resettlers should hold fast to the hope of Nazi Germany’s final victory; here their future would take root. But because the final battle was not yet won, Unruh sought to “reawaken” “their will for discipline and unity,” he reported to Dr. Wolfrum.

“As a fellow countryman,” Unruh made “the most serious appeal” to the resettlers to be grateful and “to recognize what the Motherland—and that in the fifth year of the war—was doing for them.” Unruh reminded his listeners (largely women) that women in Germany had “sacrificed their sons, husbands and fiancées in order to bring about a better, more just order in Europe and in the world.” The Führer’s goals for Germany, Europe and the world were the good and right ingredients for global justice, peace and stability. And now Mennonites so wondrously transplanted to the Motherland “could also be expected,” Unruh suggested, “to join in the fight against this raging hell with pure and passionate intercession for our [war] heroes, for our Führer and for our entire [German] Volk.” In this way they would best help “to protect and support” their family members “left behind in Soviet exile. And if someone falls on the [war] front or in Siberia, he falls into Eternal arms!” (note 11). According to Unruh costly sacrifices were still required (Unruh’s son Fritz too had already died in battle) and any heroic loss of life was assuredly covered by the Divine’s immutable love and everlasting embrace. Afterwards Unruh boasted to Wolfrum that in his assessment his camp tour “was not without significance.”

Unruh won over the SS leaders of the Danzig-West Prussian camps. The denominational chair Pastor Emil Händiges wrote to Unruh a month later: “SS-Hauptsturmführer Bösche and [SS-Untersturmführer] Fast spoke of you, dear Unruh, with great appreciation and enthusiasm, and also showed us the greatest confidence” (note 12).

Unruh’s visit was a win for Bösche and the SS. Bösche could report remarkable success in attracting Mennonite volunteers for the Waffen-SS in the months following the visit:

“It can be said here, however, that especially the resettlers from the last Operation Chortitza, above all those born in 1915 [age 28] and younger, already in December almost without exception wanted to voluntarily present themselves to the supplementary unit of the Waffen-SS for an acceptance examination. This shows the success of the ideological training on the part of the camp leaders, who have to carry this out on an ongoing basis by order of the operational command.” (Note 13)

Bösche gives us a snapshot of the incentives offered to Operation Chortitza women and children who had a family member in the Wehrmacht or Waffen-SS. They were given preferential treatment by camp commanders, offered assistance in filing applications and requests, in the procurement of clothing and footwear, and also were also “taken into protection if they feel that they have been wronged by any lack of understanding on the part of the other resettlers” (note 14).

Bösche was eager to ensure that his camps were the best in the Reich—“impeccable” and with a positive atmosphere—especially for his favourites, the Low Germans of Frisian origin, otherwise known as Mennonites. Bösche promised his superiors that “resettlers will continue to be cared for in every possible way to make their stay in the camp easier and pleasant” (note 15).

Unruh’s visit was also significant for the West Prussian Mennonite ministerial who not only received authorized passage to all the camps, but a certificate from Bösche requiring individual camp leaders “to assist” them in their pastoral work in the camps “in any way possible.” Heubuden Mennonite Church elder Bruno Ewert (a Nazi Party member) and SS-Untersturmführer Fast also agreed on the regulation of worship services (off-site) and a more equal distribution of lay preachers in each camp (note 16). Ewert baptized 47 at the Konradstein and Kulm Camps (note 17), and Danzig Pastor Erich Göttner baptized 10 at the Neustadt Camp.

In his report to Wolfrum, Unruh skillfully articulated how Mennonite worship opportunities in the camp linked well with the priorities of Nazi Germany.

“The regulation of the religious services and the religious instruction of the youth are of utmost importance [to the resettlers]. In our Russian-German experiences over all the years and decades of Bolshevik rule, persecution of religion was the sign (Signum) of demonic Bolshevism. They will perceive the restoration of religious life as the most specific sign of rescue/salvation. It may be pointed out that the Russian-German experience uniquely favours their optimum association with National Socialist Germany.” (Note 18)

Few had the resources, background and skill to think and argue differently. It is likely that most followed compliantly where Unruh led, and some—like former Chortitza District Mayor and friend to Unruh, Johann Epp—were wholly aligned ideologically and fervent co-workers (note 19).

That world crashed a year-and-a-half later, with all its horrors revealed. More Mennonite sons, brothers and fathers were lost in service to the Führer than under Stalin—at least that was the case in our family. Unruh conflated the ways of God and the criminal ambitions of the Führer and Reichsführer. He leveraged his power, influence and storied Mennonite reputation to recommend to the vulnerable full adoption of the Nazi worldview and its ambitions. Unruh was excited to establish a renewed, unified and racially pure Mennonite church in Germany’s east.

Somehow the very real and lingering impact Unruh had on the resettlers—like many in my childhood church community—had lost the troublesome content above. I wonder how that was internalized and how long that toxic worldview was silently assumed, its loss mourned and/or reshaped in our immigrant, bilingual congregations. How did it impact our discussions of worship practice and language, a recovery of Anabaptism and peace theology, of leadership and ethnicity? How did it impact relationships with the 1920s Canadian Russländer sitting in the same pews? What still needs work and repair in the next generation?

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: See Part I – a preface to this post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/10/operation-chortitza-resettler-camps-in.html.

Note 2: Waldemar Janzen, Growing Up in Turbulent Times (Winnipeg, MB: CMU Press, 2007), 63f., https://www.cmu.ca/docs/cmupress/CMU-GROWING-UP-IN-TURBULENT-TIMES.pdf.

Note 3: On Unruh, see my essay: “Benjamin Unruh, MCC [Mennonite Central Committee] and National Socialism,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 96, no. 2 (April 2022), 157–205, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1571.

Note 4: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/10/a-small-town-near-auschwitz-chortitza.html.

Note 5: Operations Commander SS-Hauptsturmführer Bösche, “Tätigkeitsbericht der Volksdeutschen Mittelstelle in Gau Danzig-Westpreussen für 1. Jan. [1943] bis 31. Jan. 1944,” Bundesarchiv R 59/109, Blätter 31-37, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/54c4be9f-0130-4868-baec-e7a6b5c6628a/.

Note 6: Benjamin H. Unruh to SS-Obersturmführer Dr. Wolfrum and SS-Obersturmführer Klingsporn, Volkdeutsche Mittelstelle, November 6, 1943, Vereinigung Executive File 1943, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof [hereafter MFSt]. Thanks to Ben Goossen for sharing copies of the file.

Note 7: Benjamin H. Unruh to Gustav Reimer, letter, December 30, 1943, Vereinigung Collection, folder 1943, MFSt. On Wolfrum and Hoffmeyer, see Eric C. Steinhart, The Holocaust and the Germanization of Ukraine (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015).

Note 8: Benjamin Unruh together with Hoffmeyer and SS-Obergruppenführer Werner Lorenz were special guests of Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler over the New Years holiday, 1942-43; cf. Unruh’s letter to Vereinigung (denominational) Executive, Jan. 6, 1943, 2, file folder 1943, Vereinigung Collection, MFSt.

Note 9: Cf. Haig A. Bosmajian, “The Magic Word in Nazi Persuasion,” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 23, no. 1 (March 1966), 9-23.

Note 10: Unruh to Wolfrum and Klingsporn, November 6, 1943.

Note 11: Unruh to Wolfrum and Klingsporn, November 6, 1943.

Note 12: Händiges to Executive, Dec. 1, 1943. Händiges visited the camps and camp leadership accompanied by Danzig Mennonite pastor Erich Göttner.

Note 13: Bösche, Tätigkeitsbericht. The enthusiasm to volunteer may have been more complicated than Bösche reported; compare John Braun’s experience in Camp Neustadt (Danzig) in Road to Freedom: Mennonites Escape the Land of Suffering, edited by Harry Loewen (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2000), 141.

Note 14: Bösche, Tätigkeitsbericht.

Note 15: Bösche, Tätigkeitsbericht, Blatt 37; similarly Blätter 31 and 36.

Note 16: Bruno Ewert to Benjamin Unruh, letter, November 8, 1943, folder 1943, Vereinigung Collection, MFSt.

Note 17: Pastor Erich Göttner (Danzig), Mitteilungen der ost- and westpreußischen Mennoniten 4 (Aug. 1944), 8-10, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/V_18/box%207%20Winnipeg/68/. Cf. Anna Pauls’ memory of the Pentecost 1944 baptismal service at Konradstein, in Loewen, Road to Freedom, 211f.

Note 18: Unruh to Wolfrum and Klingsporn, November 6, 1943.

Note 19: Johann Epp, now with 7,000 others from the district in Upper Silesia, updated Unruh in October 1943. Unruh quotes him at length in his report to the Vereinigung Executive, January 7, 1944 (“Vollbericht über die Lagerbesuche,” 3); from Benjamin Unruh Collection, folder “Correspondence with Abraham Braun, 1930, 1940, 1944–45,” MFSt.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "'Operation Chortitza' (Part II) -- Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), October 18, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/10/operation-chortitza-part-ii-resettler.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C