Skip to main content

“Operation Chortitza” (Part II) – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44

Waldemar Janzen, my former German professor and advisee, turned eleven years old in 1943. He and his mother and 3,900 others from Chortitza and Rosenthal (Ukraine) were evacuated west to the ethnic German resettler camps in Gau Danzig-West Prussia in October that year (see Part I; note 1). Years later Janzen could still recall much from this childhood experience—including the impact of the visit by Professor Benjamin H. Unruh a few weeks after their arrival. “He was a man who had extended much help to his fellow Mennonites ever since they began to emigrate from Russia during the 1920s” (note 2). Unruh was a father-figure to his people, and his arrival at their camp in West Prussia signaled to the evacuees that they were in good hands (note 3). Unruh’s impact on 7,000 other Chortitza District villagers in Upper Silesia would be the same some weeks later (note 4).

Surprisingly Unruh’s West Prussian camps visit left an equally indelible impression on the Gau’s Operations Commander for Resettler Camps, SS-Hauptsturmführer Bösche and on his deputy SS-Untersturmführer Günther Fast.

In Bösche’s annual report on the camps some three months later (note 5), he underscored Unruh’s visit to “Chortitza-Germans in all the main camps” as a stirring and significant highlight. Events in Bösche’s camps in 1943 included:

  • 11 concerts with a total number of participants of 2,300;
  • 10 poetry evenings, 2,180 participants;
  • 28 political lectures, 5,160 participants (by Reich Propaganda Office and camp leaders);
  • 28 ceremonial events, 12,400 participants (Führer’s birthday; Fallen Heroes Day etc.);
  • 52 film screenings, 12,200 participants (“the ‘Newsreels’ gave the resettlers particular pleasure, because they often included segments that came from their immediate homeland”).

But none of the activities left the same impression as Unruh’s talks; the report mentions him three times by name.

Unruh sent a summary of his message to a senior officer of the Ethnic German Liaison Office (VoMi), SS-Obergruppenführer Dr. Gerhard Wolfrum (note 6)—tasked to assist Unruh “in all matters” (note 7)—who in turn reported to SS-Oberführer Horst Hoffmeyer (Sonderkommando R), who reported directly to Reichsführer-SS Himmler. Unruh was never reticent to remind SS leaders of his mandate: “It is a serious concern of mine, in the spirit of the discussions at the headquarters of the Reichsführer-SS (Himmler) and with the head of the Ethnic German Liaison Office, SS-Obergruppenführer Lorenz, to help expand the care of the ethnic Germans in and from the eastern region to the best of my ability and knowledge” (note 8).

Unruh’s address in each camp was introduced and framed by Bösche or Fast—an official regime blessing not lost on the resettlers. The latter were still traumatized and vulnerable and, as Unruh reported to Dr. Wolfrum, his goal was “to strengthen their trust in God, in the Führer, and in the Reichsführer-SS [Himmler]”—a surprisingly unorthodox trinity for a Mennonite salvation message.

Unruh sought to provide a path and give hope not only to his pious co-religionists, but also to the youth, convincing them to place their confidence and trust “in our Führer who has intervened to save you”—adding that it is nothing less than “the omnipotence and all-goodness of Providence itself which steers and strengthens his [Hitler’s] arm.” Providence is a term which Unruh’s Mennonites could connect to God’s care, provision, and guidance on their life journey. But it was also one of the “magic words in Nazi persuasion” (note 9) which Unruh deployed to the satisfaction of SS-leadership in the room. Like a Church father who offers a fresh expression of an ancient faith for believers and would-be believers alike, Unruh’s message resonated both with resettlers and SS-men who knew Hitler’s propensity to speak of providence in relation to himself.

Unruh lectured extemporaneously on the contrast between “life under Bolshevik terror and life under National Socialist leadership” (note 10). Resettlers should hold fast to the hope of Nazi Germany’s final victory; here their future would take root. But because the final battle was not yet won, Unruh sought to “reawaken” “their will for discipline and unity,” he reported to Dr. Wolfrum.

“As a fellow countryman,” Unruh made “the most serious appeal” to the resettlers to be grateful and “to recognize what the Motherland—and that in the fifth year of the war—was doing for them.” Unruh reminded his listeners (largely women) that women in Germany had “sacrificed their sons, husbands and fiancées in order to bring about a better, more just order in Europe and in the world.” The Führer’s goals for Germany, Europe and the world were the good and right ingredients for global justice, peace and stability. And now Mennonites so wondrously transplanted to the Motherland “could also be expected,” Unruh suggested, “to join in the fight against this raging hell with pure and passionate intercession for our [war] heroes, for our Führer and for our entire [German] Volk.” In this way they would best help “to protect and support” their family members “left behind in Soviet exile. And if someone falls on the [war] front or in Siberia, he falls into Eternal arms!” (note 11). According to Unruh costly sacrifices were still required (Unruh’s son Fritz too had already died in battle) and any heroic loss of life was assuredly covered by the Divine’s immutable love and everlasting embrace. Afterwards Unruh boasted to Wolfrum that in his assessment his camp tour “was not without significance.”

Unruh won over the SS leaders of the Danzig-West Prussian camps. The denominational chair Pastor Emil Händiges wrote to Unruh a month later: “SS-Hauptsturmführer Bösche and [SS-Untersturmführer] Fast spoke of you, dear Unruh, with great appreciation and enthusiasm, and also showed us the greatest confidence” (note 12).

Unruh’s visit was a win for Bösche and the SS. Bösche could report remarkable success in attracting Mennonite volunteers for the Waffen-SS in the months following the visit:

“It can be said here, however, that especially the resettlers from the last Operation Chortitza, above all those born in 1915 [age 28] and younger, already in December almost without exception wanted to voluntarily present themselves to the supplementary unit of the Waffen-SS for an acceptance examination. This shows the success of the ideological training on the part of the camp leaders, who have to carry this out on an ongoing basis by order of the operational command.” (Note 13)

Bösche gives us a snapshot of the incentives offered to Operation Chortitza women and children who had a family member in the Wehrmacht or Waffen-SS. They were given preferential treatment by camp commanders, offered assistance in filing applications and requests, in the procurement of clothing and footwear, and also were also “taken into protection if they feel that they have been wronged by any lack of understanding on the part of the other resettlers” (note 14).

Bösche was eager to ensure that his camps were the best in the Reich—“impeccable” and with a positive atmosphere—especially for his favourites, the Low Germans of Frisian origin, otherwise known as Mennonites. Bösche promised his superiors that “resettlers will continue to be cared for in every possible way to make their stay in the camp easier and pleasant” (note 15).

Unruh’s visit was also significant for the West Prussian Mennonite ministerial who not only received authorized passage to all the camps, but a certificate from Bösche requiring individual camp leaders “to assist” them in their pastoral work in the camps “in any way possible.” Heubuden Mennonite Church elder Bruno Ewert (a Nazi Party member) and SS-Untersturmführer Fast also agreed on the regulation of worship services (off-site) and a more equal distribution of lay preachers in each camp (note 16). Ewert baptized 47 at the Konradstein and Kulm Camps (note 17), and Danzig Pastor Erich Göttner baptized 10 at the Neustadt Camp.

In his report to Wolfrum, Unruh skillfully articulated how Mennonite worship opportunities in the camp linked well with the priorities of Nazi Germany.

“The regulation of the religious services and the religious instruction of the youth are of utmost importance [to the resettlers]. In our Russian-German experiences over all the years and decades of Bolshevik rule, persecution of religion was the sign (Signum) of demonic Bolshevism. They will perceive the restoration of religious life as the most specific sign of rescue/salvation. It may be pointed out that the Russian-German experience uniquely favours their optimum association with National Socialist Germany.” (Note 18)

Few had the resources, background and skill to think and argue differently. It is likely that most followed compliantly where Unruh led, and some—like former Chortitza District Mayor and friend to Unruh, Johann Epp—were wholly aligned ideologically and fervent co-workers (note 19).

That world crashed a year-and-a-half later, with all its horrors revealed. More Mennonite sons, brothers and fathers were lost in service to the Führer than under Stalin—at least that was the case in our family. Unruh conflated the ways of God and the criminal ambitions of the Führer and Reichsführer. He leveraged his power, influence and storied Mennonite reputation to recommend to the vulnerable full adoption of the Nazi worldview and its ambitions. Unruh was excited to establish a renewed, unified and racially pure Mennonite church in Germany’s east.

Somehow the very real and lingering impact Unruh had on the resettlers—like many in my childhood church community—had lost the troublesome content above. I wonder how that was internalized and how long that toxic worldview was silently assumed, its loss mourned and/or reshaped in our immigrant, bilingual congregations. How did it impact our discussions of worship practice and language, a recovery of Anabaptism and peace theology, of leadership and ethnicity? How did it impact relationships with the 1920s Canadian Russländer sitting in the same pews? What still needs work and repair in the next generation?

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: See Part I – a preface to this post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/10/operation-chortitza-resettler-camps-in.html.

Note 2: Waldemar Janzen, Growing Up in Turbulent Times (Winnipeg, MB: CMU Press, 2007), 63f., https://www.cmu.ca/docs/cmupress/CMU-GROWING-UP-IN-TURBULENT-TIMES.pdf.

Note 3: On Unruh, see my essay: “Benjamin Unruh, MCC [Mennonite Central Committee] and National Socialism,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 96, no. 2 (April 2022), 157–205, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1571.

Note 4: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/10/a-small-town-near-auschwitz-chortitza.html.

Note 5: Operations Commander SS-Hauptsturmführer Bösche, “Tätigkeitsbericht der Volksdeutschen Mittelstelle in Gau Danzig-Westpreussen für 1. Jan. [1943] bis 31. Jan. 1944,” Bundesarchiv R 59/109, Blätter 31-37, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/54c4be9f-0130-4868-baec-e7a6b5c6628a/.

Note 6: Benjamin H. Unruh to SS-Obersturmführer Dr. Wolfrum and SS-Obersturmführer Klingsporn, Volkdeutsche Mittelstelle, November 6, 1943, Vereinigung Executive File 1943, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof [hereafter MFSt]. Thanks to Ben Goossen for sharing copies of the file.

Note 7: Benjamin H. Unruh to Gustav Reimer, letter, December 30, 1943, Vereinigung Collection, folder 1943, MFSt. On Wolfrum and Hoffmeyer, see Eric C. Steinhart, The Holocaust and the Germanization of Ukraine (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015).

Note 8: Benjamin Unruh together with Hoffmeyer and SS-Obergruppenführer Werner Lorenz were special guests of Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler over the New Years holiday, 1942-43; cf. Unruh’s letter to Vereinigung (denominational) Executive, Jan. 6, 1943, 2, file folder 1943, Vereinigung Collection, MFSt.

Note 9: Cf. Haig A. Bosmajian, “The Magic Word in Nazi Persuasion,” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 23, no. 1 (March 1966), 9-23.

Note 10: Unruh to Wolfrum and Klingsporn, November 6, 1943.

Note 11: Unruh to Wolfrum and Klingsporn, November 6, 1943.

Note 12: Händiges to Executive, Dec. 1, 1943. Händiges visited the camps and camp leadership accompanied by Danzig Mennonite pastor Erich Göttner.

Note 13: Bösche, Tätigkeitsbericht. The enthusiasm to volunteer may have been more complicated than Bösche reported; compare John Braun’s experience in Camp Neustadt (Danzig) in Road to Freedom: Mennonites Escape the Land of Suffering, edited by Harry Loewen (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2000), 141.

Note 14: Bösche, Tätigkeitsbericht.

Note 15: Bösche, Tätigkeitsbericht, Blatt 37; similarly Blätter 31 and 36.

Note 16: Bruno Ewert to Benjamin Unruh, letter, November 8, 1943, folder 1943, Vereinigung Collection, MFSt.

Note 17: Pastor Erich Göttner (Danzig), Mitteilungen der ost- and westpreußischen Mennoniten 4 (Aug. 1944), 8-10, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/V_18/box%207%20Winnipeg/68/. Cf. Anna Pauls’ memory of the Pentecost 1944 baptismal service at Konradstein, in Loewen, Road to Freedom, 211f.

Note 18: Unruh to Wolfrum and Klingsporn, November 6, 1943.

Note 19: Johann Epp, now with 7,000 others from the district in Upper Silesia, updated Unruh in October 1943. Unruh quotes him at length in his report to the Vereinigung Executive, January 7, 1944 (“Vollbericht über die Lagerbesuche,” 3); from Benjamin Unruh Collection, folder “Correspondence with Abraham Braun, 1930, 1940, 1944–45,” MFSt.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "'Operation Chortitza' (Part II) -- Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), October 18, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/10/operation-chortitza-part-ii-resettler.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...