Skip to main content

“Operation Chortitza” (Part II) – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44

Waldemar Janzen, my former German professor and advisee, turned eleven years old in 1943. He and his mother and 3,900 others from Chortitza and Rosenthal (Ukraine) were evacuated west to the ethnic German resettler camps in Gau Danzig-West Prussia in October that year (see Part I; note 1). Years later Janzen could still recall much from this childhood experience—including the impact of the visit by Professor Benjamin H. Unruh a few weeks after their arrival. “He was a man who had extended much help to his fellow Mennonites ever since they began to emigrate from Russia during the 1920s” (note 2). Unruh was a father-figure to his people, and his arrival at their camp in West Prussia signaled to the evacuees that they were in good hands (note 3). Unruh’s impact on 7,000 other Chortitza District villagers in Upper Silesia would be the same some weeks later (note 4).

Surprisingly Unruh’s West Prussian camps visit left an equally indelible impression on the Gau’s Operations Commander for Resettler Camps, SS-Hauptsturmführer Bösche and on his deputy SS-Untersturmführer Günther Fast.

In Bösche’s annual report on the camps some three months later (note 5), he underscored Unruh’s visit to “Chortitza-Germans in all the main camps” as a stirring and significant highlight. Events in Bösche’s camps in 1943 included:

  • 11 concerts with a total number of participants of 2,300;
  • 10 poetry evenings, 2,180 participants;
  • 28 political lectures, 5,160 participants (by Reich Propaganda Office and camp leaders);
  • 28 ceremonial events, 12,400 participants (Führer’s birthday; Fallen Heroes Day etc.);
  • 52 film screenings, 12,200 participants (“the ‘Newsreels’ gave the resettlers particular pleasure, because they often included segments that came from their immediate homeland”).

But none of the activities left the same impression as Unruh’s talks; the report mentions him three times by name.

Unruh sent a summary of his message to a senior officer of the Ethnic German Liaison Office (VoMi), SS-Obergruppenführer Dr. Gerhard Wolfrum (note 6)—tasked to assist Unruh “in all matters” (note 7)—who in turn reported to SS-Oberführer Horst Hoffmeyer (Sonderkommando R), who reported directly to Reichsführer-SS Himmler. Unruh was never reticent to remind SS leaders of his mandate: “It is a serious concern of mine, in the spirit of the discussions at the headquarters of the Reichsführer-SS (Himmler) and with the head of the Ethnic German Liaison Office, SS-Obergruppenführer Lorenz, to help expand the care of the ethnic Germans in and from the eastern region to the best of my ability and knowledge” (note 8).

Unruh’s address in each camp was introduced and framed by Bösche or Fast—an official regime blessing not lost on the resettlers. The latter were still traumatized and vulnerable and, as Unruh reported to Dr. Wolfrum, his goal was “to strengthen their trust in God, in the Führer, and in the Reichsführer-SS [Himmler]”—a surprisingly unorthodox trinity for a Mennonite salvation message.

Unruh sought to provide a path and give hope not only to his pious co-religionists, but also to the youth, convincing them to place their confidence and trust “in our Führer who has intervened to save you”—adding that it is nothing less than “the omnipotence and all-goodness of Providence itself which steers and strengthens his [Hitler’s] arm.” Providence is a term which Unruh’s Mennonites could connect to God’s care, provision, and guidance on their life journey. But it was also one of the “magic words in Nazi persuasion” (note 9) which Unruh deployed to the satisfaction of SS-leadership in the room. Like a Church father who offers a fresh expression of an ancient faith for believers and would-be believers alike, Unruh’s message resonated both with resettlers and SS-men who knew Hitler’s propensity to speak of providence in relation to himself.

Unruh lectured extemporaneously on the contrast between “life under Bolshevik terror and life under National Socialist leadership” (note 10). Resettlers should hold fast to the hope of Nazi Germany’s final victory; here their future would take root. But because the final battle was not yet won, Unruh sought to “reawaken” “their will for discipline and unity,” he reported to Dr. Wolfrum.

“As a fellow countryman,” Unruh made “the most serious appeal” to the resettlers to be grateful and “to recognize what the Motherland—and that in the fifth year of the war—was doing for them.” Unruh reminded his listeners (largely women) that women in Germany had “sacrificed their sons, husbands and fiancées in order to bring about a better, more just order in Europe and in the world.” The Führer’s goals for Germany, Europe and the world were the good and right ingredients for global justice, peace and stability. And now Mennonites so wondrously transplanted to the Motherland “could also be expected,” Unruh suggested, “to join in the fight against this raging hell with pure and passionate intercession for our [war] heroes, for our Führer and for our entire [German] Volk.” In this way they would best help “to protect and support” their family members “left behind in Soviet exile. And if someone falls on the [war] front or in Siberia, he falls into Eternal arms!” (note 11). According to Unruh costly sacrifices were still required (Unruh’s son Fritz too had already died in battle) and any heroic loss of life was assuredly covered by the Divine’s immutable love and everlasting embrace. Afterwards Unruh boasted to Wolfrum that in his assessment his camp tour “was not without significance.”

Unruh won over the SS leaders of the Danzig-West Prussian camps. The denominational chair Pastor Emil Händiges wrote to Unruh a month later: “SS-Hauptsturmführer Bösche and [SS-Untersturmführer] Fast spoke of you, dear Unruh, with great appreciation and enthusiasm, and also showed us the greatest confidence” (note 12).

Unruh’s visit was a win for Bösche and the SS. Bösche could report remarkable success in attracting Mennonite volunteers for the Waffen-SS in the months following the visit:

“It can be said here, however, that especially the resettlers from the last Operation Chortitza, above all those born in 1915 [age 28] and younger, already in December almost without exception wanted to voluntarily present themselves to the supplementary unit of the Waffen-SS for an acceptance examination. This shows the success of the ideological training on the part of the camp leaders, who have to carry this out on an ongoing basis by order of the operational command.” (Note 13)

Bösche gives us a snapshot of the incentives offered to Operation Chortitza women and children who had a family member in the Wehrmacht or Waffen-SS. They were given preferential treatment by camp commanders, offered assistance in filing applications and requests, in the procurement of clothing and footwear, and also were also “taken into protection if they feel that they have been wronged by any lack of understanding on the part of the other resettlers” (note 14).

Bösche was eager to ensure that his camps were the best in the Reich—“impeccable” and with a positive atmosphere—especially for his favourites, the Low Germans of Frisian origin, otherwise known as Mennonites. Bösche promised his superiors that “resettlers will continue to be cared for in every possible way to make their stay in the camp easier and pleasant” (note 15).

Unruh’s visit was also significant for the West Prussian Mennonite ministerial who not only received authorized passage to all the camps, but a certificate from Bösche requiring individual camp leaders “to assist” them in their pastoral work in the camps “in any way possible.” Heubuden Mennonite Church elder Bruno Ewert (a Nazi Party member) and SS-Untersturmführer Fast also agreed on the regulation of worship services (off-site) and a more equal distribution of lay preachers in each camp (note 16). Ewert baptized 47 at the Konradstein and Kulm Camps (note 17), and Danzig Pastor Erich Göttner baptized 10 at the Neustadt Camp.

In his report to Wolfrum, Unruh skillfully articulated how Mennonite worship opportunities in the camp linked well with the priorities of Nazi Germany.

“The regulation of the religious services and the religious instruction of the youth are of utmost importance [to the resettlers]. In our Russian-German experiences over all the years and decades of Bolshevik rule, persecution of religion was the sign (Signum) of demonic Bolshevism. They will perceive the restoration of religious life as the most specific sign of rescue/salvation. It may be pointed out that the Russian-German experience uniquely favours their optimum association with National Socialist Germany.” (Note 18)

Few had the resources, background and skill to think and argue differently. It is likely that most followed compliantly where Unruh led, and some—like former Chortitza District Mayor and friend to Unruh, Johann Epp—were wholly aligned ideologically and fervent co-workers (note 19).

That world crashed a year-and-a-half later, with all its horrors revealed. More Mennonite sons, brothers and fathers were lost in service to the Führer than under Stalin—at least that was the case in our family. Unruh conflated the ways of God and the criminal ambitions of the Führer and Reichsführer. He leveraged his power, influence and storied Mennonite reputation to recommend to the vulnerable full adoption of the Nazi worldview and its ambitions. Unruh was excited to establish a renewed, unified and racially pure Mennonite church in Germany’s east.

Somehow the very real and lingering impact Unruh had on the resettlers—like many in my childhood church community—had lost the troublesome content above. I wonder how that was internalized and how long that toxic worldview was silently assumed, its loss mourned and/or reshaped in our immigrant, bilingual congregations. How did it impact our discussions of worship practice and language, a recovery of Anabaptism and peace theology, of leadership and ethnicity? How did it impact relationships with the 1920s Canadian Russländer sitting in the same pews? What still needs work and repair in the next generation?

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: See Part I – a preface to this post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/10/operation-chortitza-resettler-camps-in.html.

Note 2: Waldemar Janzen, Growing Up in Turbulent Times (Winnipeg, MB: CMU Press, 2007), 63f., https://www.cmu.ca/docs/cmupress/CMU-GROWING-UP-IN-TURBULENT-TIMES.pdf.

Note 3: On Unruh, see my essay: “Benjamin Unruh, MCC [Mennonite Central Committee] and National Socialism,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 96, no. 2 (April 2022), 157–205, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1571.

Note 4: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/10/a-small-town-near-auschwitz-chortitza.html.

Note 5: Operations Commander SS-Hauptsturmführer Bösche, “Tätigkeitsbericht der Volksdeutschen Mittelstelle in Gau Danzig-Westpreussen für 1. Jan. [1943] bis 31. Jan. 1944,” Bundesarchiv R 59/109, Blätter 31-37, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/54c4be9f-0130-4868-baec-e7a6b5c6628a/.

Note 6: Benjamin H. Unruh to SS-Obersturmführer Dr. Wolfrum and SS-Obersturmführer Klingsporn, Volkdeutsche Mittelstelle, November 6, 1943, Vereinigung Executive File 1943, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof [hereafter MFSt]. Thanks to Ben Goossen for sharing copies of the file.

Note 7: Benjamin H. Unruh to Gustav Reimer, letter, December 30, 1943, Vereinigung Collection, folder 1943, MFSt. On Wolfrum and Hoffmeyer, see Eric C. Steinhart, The Holocaust and the Germanization of Ukraine (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015).

Note 8: Benjamin Unruh together with Hoffmeyer and SS-Obergruppenführer Werner Lorenz were special guests of Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler over the New Years holiday, 1942-43; cf. Unruh’s letter to Vereinigung (denominational) Executive, Jan. 6, 1943, 2, file folder 1943, Vereinigung Collection, MFSt.

Note 9: Cf. Haig A. Bosmajian, “The Magic Word in Nazi Persuasion,” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 23, no. 1 (March 1966), 9-23.

Note 10: Unruh to Wolfrum and Klingsporn, November 6, 1943.

Note 11: Unruh to Wolfrum and Klingsporn, November 6, 1943.

Note 12: Händiges to Executive, Dec. 1, 1943. Händiges visited the camps and camp leadership accompanied by Danzig Mennonite pastor Erich Göttner.

Note 13: Bösche, Tätigkeitsbericht. The enthusiasm to volunteer may have been more complicated than Bösche reported; compare John Braun’s experience in Camp Neustadt (Danzig) in Road to Freedom: Mennonites Escape the Land of Suffering, edited by Harry Loewen (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2000), 141.

Note 14: Bösche, Tätigkeitsbericht.

Note 15: Bösche, Tätigkeitsbericht, Blatt 37; similarly Blätter 31 and 36.

Note 16: Bruno Ewert to Benjamin Unruh, letter, November 8, 1943, folder 1943, Vereinigung Collection, MFSt.

Note 17: Pastor Erich Göttner (Danzig), Mitteilungen der ost- and westpreußischen Mennoniten 4 (Aug. 1944), 8-10, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/V_18/box%207%20Winnipeg/68/. Cf. Anna Pauls’ memory of the Pentecost 1944 baptismal service at Konradstein, in Loewen, Road to Freedom, 211f.

Note 18: Unruh to Wolfrum and Klingsporn, November 6, 1943.

Note 19: Johann Epp, now with 7,000 others from the district in Upper Silesia, updated Unruh in October 1943. Unruh quotes him at length in his report to the Vereinigung Executive, January 7, 1944 (“Vollbericht über die Lagerbesuche,” 3); from Benjamin Unruh Collection, folder “Correspondence with Abraham Braun, 1930, 1940, 1944–45,” MFSt.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "'Operation Chortitza' (Part II) -- Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), October 18, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/10/operation-chortitza-part-ii-resettler.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Swiss and Palatinate Connections

Sometime after 1850 Andreas Plennert and his family immigrated to South Russia from the Culm Region of West Prussia. Though there was at least one Mennonite “Plehnert” who had already immigrated to Russia in 1793, it is not a very common Prussian-Russian Mennonite name. As such, however, it is easier to trace than many and offers a minority narrative and identity within the longer and broader Russian Mennonite story. The account below is adapted largely from information in Horst Penner, Die ost- und westpreußischen Mennoniten , vol. 1, though I have expanded upon his work to offer a slightly different narrative. In 1724 there was a group of Mennonites forced out of the Memel region in East Prussia for political and religious reasons and were given assistance to resettle back to West Prussia in areas populated by Mennonites. Among the 23 households that went to the Stuhm region there is one Plenert listed, namely Christian Plenert. We know that Mennonites entered the Memel region ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

The Shift from Dutch to German, 1700s

Already in 1671, Mennonite Flemish Elder Georg Hansen in Danzig published his German-language catechism ( Glaubens-Bericht für die Jugend ) as preparation for youth seeking baptism. Though educational competencies varied, Hansen’s Glaubens-Bericht assumed that youth preparing for baptism had a stronger ability to read complex German than Dutch ( note 1 ). Popular Mennonite preacher Jacob Denner (1659–1746), originally from the Hamburg-Altona Mennonite Church, lived in Danzig for four years in the early 1700s. A first volume of his Dutch sermons was published in 1706 in Danzig and Amsterdam, and then in 1730 and 1751 he published two German collections. Untrained preachers would often read Denner’s sermons: “Those who preached German—which all Prussian preachers around 1750 did, with the exception of the Danzig preachers—had no sermons books from their co-religionists other than this one by Jacob Denner” ( note 2 ). In Danzig and the Vistula Delta region there were some differences...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...

Last Days of Mennonite Life on the Molotschna, September 1943

The Molotschna Mennonite Colony was established in 1803; 140 years later its villages were evacuated by retreating German armies. A map of the larger German operation of 1943 and the various "Trecks" is attached. The tens of thousands of evacuees included some 35,000 Mennonites. Nazi Germany had utterly failed Ukrainians, but continued to have plans for their "ethnic Germans" in the east. On Sept. 8, 1943 , the Red Army successfully took Donetsk (Stalino), 230 km east of Molotschna. The next day, S.S. administrators gave orders that every Molotschna family should load one wagon with their possessions and prepare for an orderly evacuation. Hitler was intent on holding Crimea, and sought to set up a defensive line from Zaporizhzhia to Melitopol and south to the Sea of Azov. Evacuation plans east of this line were in place since late June—initially to be resettled “somewhere” west of the Dnieper; on Aug. 17 first steps were taken to move 8,000 hospital beds west o...

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...

Why Danzig and Poland?

In the late 16th century, Poland became a haven for a variety of non-conformists which included Jews, Anti-Trinitarians from Italy and Bohemia, Quakers and Calvinists from Great Britain, south German Schwenkfelders, Eastern Orthodox, Armenian, and Greek Catholic Christians, some Muslim Tatars, as well as other peaceful sectarians like the Dutch and Flemish Anabaptists. Unlike the Low Countries and most of western Europe, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was a “state without stakes,” and as such fittingly described as “God’s playground” ( note 1 ). In the view of 17th-century Dutch dramatist Joost van den Vondel, it was “the ‘Promised Land,’ where the refugee could forget all his sorrow and enjoy the richness of the land” ( note 2 ). Over the next two centuries an important strand of Mennonite life and spirituality evolved into a mature tradition in this relatively hospitable context ( note 3 ). Anabaptists from the Low Countries began to arrive in Danzig and region as early as 15...

Congregational Discipline: Trouble with "the Saints”

Gerhard Wiebe was elder of the Elbing-Ellerwalde (Polish-Prussia) Mennonite Church from 1778-1796, which includes the years of early immigration to Russia. His ministerial diary lists many names, and each comes with a story ( note 1 ). Wiebe’s accounts of church discipline are particularly revealing for helping us understand the first immigrant generation to New Russia. After preaching the gospel, the elder's most important duty was discipline, and this elder kept note of everything. Wiebe’s cases included: • regular incidences of drunkenness; • bar-tending at “The Kruge” [pitcher / name of inn], with music and all manner of “wicked things”; • leading an “immoral” lifestyle; • dancing in “The Lame Hand” pub [?], • stealing pigs; • licentiousness and leading a worldly life; • jeering and fist-fighting on the street; • excessive agitation and anger (mixed with alcohol); • forgery of payment records, non-payment of debts; • engagement/ marriage to a Lutheran, o...