Skip to main content

Nogai Encounters: Memories in the 1848 Village Reports

Biographies, memoirs, interviews, and diaries inevitably include and often exaggerate those parts of the life-story that support the claim of the storyteller, and omit or flatten other parts assumed to be irrelevant or in contradiction to the preferred storyline.

In 1848, the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Colonists President Eugen von Hahn tasked each village administration to work with the schoolteacher to produce an exact historical description of its settlement and key events in its history (note 1). Notably most village histories are silent or say very little about their engagements with their Nogai neighbours whom they had displaced.

Mennonites were fully aware that their colony on the Molotschna River was on lands of the nomadic Nogai, and that the Nogai had been forcibly displaced for Greater Russia’s colonizing program. This earlier history of the land is noted in a few village reports.

“In this location there used to be a large Nogai village. By order of authorities the Nogai moved away in 1805 and settled in a distance of 12 versts from here and further.” (Lindenau, 99)

“On the location of the present village of Altona there were once the tent dwellings of the Nogai, the traces of which can still be seen today [1848] in some raised earthen and dung walls.” (Altona, 115)

“Since the Nogai who lived here do not have houses, but only beehive-like tent huts made of sticks and felt blankets, so-called 'Koschen' [which they transported on their two-wheeled carts from place to place], the first [foreign] settlers found no shelter here, and for the first winter set up earthen huts.” [Before the arrival of Mennonites]“… the Nogai swarmed about with their herds on the open, treeless steppe.” (Muntau, 95; 94; Lindenau, 99)

“The nomadic Tatars who used this steppe had to evacuate the area by order of the authorities when the Germans [Mennonites] arrived, but they remained dangerous neighbours” (Rosenort, 126; 128).

“The village land was originally occupied by [Nogai cattle-herd owners] who vacated the settlement but remained neighbours.” (Blumenort, 128)

“There were no houses in the area, only nomadic Nogai moved from place to place with their felt huts (called Kibitki) to let their herds graze the best possible pasture.” (Ohrloff, 162)

“The village was founded in 1821 … The land was uninhabited at that time and was grazed by the cattle herds of the neighbouring Russians and Nogai people.” (Gnadenheim, 144)

Because the nomadic Nogai constructed no permanent buildings, even their “best” grazing lands and temporary village lands were considered “unoccupied” or “empty.” Their presence was like a “swarm” of unwelcome steppe creatures that come and go, and their “evacuation,” displacement and containment was remembered as part of the state’s civilizing agenda. Mennonites understood their role as a positive force for this vision of colonization.

The recollections of encounter with the Nogai were consistently negative and paternalistic in the Mennonite village histories.

“[Our] interactions were mostly around horses: the old and useless ones they bought for slaughter, and the best ones they stole.” (Blumenort, 128)

“At first the Nogai people were very obstructive to the newcomers in their economic endeavours; they not only disturbed the work in the fields, but also robbed the few horses that one already had. Whatever else the bandits could get their hands on from the herds also disappeared. Most thefts usually occurred in the sowing season.” (Ohrloff, 161; 162)

“Violence and theft were initially perpetrated by the Nogai neighbours. On April 23, 1811, Jakob Friesen, a farmer in this village, was attacked on the steppe and almost beaten to death with hammers. Colonists however rushed to save him from certain death. Horse thefts were particularly common, causing some colonists to lose fortunes in one night. In April 1813, ten of the best horses were taken by force in one night.” (Schönau, 97f.)

Typical was Altona—the Mennonite village closest to the Nogai lands south of Molotschna. Altona resident and District Mayor Klaas Wiens and Secretary Aron Warkentin changed the original name of the village from Altonau to Altona; they explained that it was a mix of Low German and High German words: “alto” (e.g., “all too”) and “nah” (or close), that is: “all too near” to “the still-feared indigenous Nogai herdsmen,” as the village history recalls (Altona, 114).

In 1808 the Nogai were “induced” to build villages, settle permanently and renounce robbery. An “advance in civilization” was slow, according to another (non-Mennonite) account in 1838. “In short, they are a people only emerging from barbarism, and have as yet made but the first step towards habitual industry” (note 2). While Mennonites were rightly worried about horse theft, it is not surprising that land surveyors were not welcomed by the Nogai.

“A particularly sad event hit this village [Rosenort] in 1811 in the night from April 19 to 20. The settler Jakob Berg, who was a district secretary, Jakob Wiens, son of Klaas Wiens, and a stranger named Dirk Reimer, rode across the steppe in the evening on colony business to advance the surveying of the land. They were attacked and murdered by Tartars. The next day their corpses were found on the steppe designated to the village of Tiege. When the stolen items were identified the murderers were discovered.” (Rosenort, 126)

A few villages established in the 1820s and ‘30s note that the still “empty” Molotschna colony lands were leased by leaders Johann Cornies or Klaas Wiens and then rented back to the Nogai for grazing “for a monthly payment” (Lichtfelde, 188; see also Schardau, Elisabethtal, etc.). While Cornies and colony coffers benefitted from this arrangement, the Nogai did not.

The graciousness of the “nation’s father” is remembered in village names (Gnadenheim, 144), but not the Nogai who shared land and labour with them.

By 1848 the wealth and prosperity of Mennonite villages was enabled by new markets available with the construction of the port of Berdyansk. That Nogai lands were also expropriated for the port city is not mentioned in the village histories, nor the fact that many Nogai wagonners were contracted to cart Mennonite grain to the port.

“Another extremely important event for this area is the establishment of the seaside town of Berdyansk, for which we feel deeply indebted to the high government” (Halbstadt, 91). A footnote added by a later German editor explains that “Berdyansk—a port city since 1837—was founded in 1827 on the site of the former Nogai settlement of Kotur Ogu, and offered colonists the opportunity to export grain abroad, which resulted in a transformation of their entire economy.”

The village reports were written a few months after Johann Cornies' unexpected and early death in 1848. Cornies' relationship with the Nogai was of a different scale and very complex. The survey above however offers a broader account of how Molotschna Mennonites as such remembered and spoke of their Nogai neighbours with whom they shared the land. The stories support the narrative of success and prosperity of Mennonites as model colonists on “empty” lands, and omit or flatten other parts as irrelevant—the Nogai encounters, their forced displacement, and labour.

Perhaps these histories are helpful for understanding later Mennonite engagements with Indigenous peoples in North and South America as well.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Drawings are from Jean de Baron Reuilly, Travels in the Crimea, and Along the Shores of the Black Sea, Performed During the Year 1803, translated from the French (London: R. Phillips, 1807), 55, https://archive.org/details/b29345340_0014/page/54/mode/2up. See other images in previous posts: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/islamic-nogai-neighbours.html (and forthcoming).

Note 1: Evgenii von Hahn, “Zirkularaufforderung 43 an sämtliche Schulzenämter und Schullehrer (January 8, 1848),” in Josef A. Malinowsky, Die Planerkolonien am Asowschen Meere, Appendix IV, 85–86 (Stuttgart: Ausland und Heimat Verlag, 1928), 85-86, https://chortitza.org/kb/malinows.pdf. All of the village histories /quotes in this post come from the collection by Margarete Woltner, ed., Die Gemeindeberichte von 1848 der deutschen Siedlungen am Schwarzen Meer (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1941), https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/kb/woltner.pdf.

Note 2: See the 1838 English summary and review of Daniel Schlatter’s “Life among the Tatars” (Bruchstücke aus einigen Reisen nach dem südlichen Rußland in den Jahren 1822 bis 1828) in The Athenaeum, no. 553 (June 2, 1838), 388, https://archive.org/details/sim_athenaeum-uk_1838-06-02_553/page/388/mode/2up. Schlatter’s volume: https://www.e-rara.ch/zuz/content/zoom/7881850.

---
To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Nogai Encounters: Memories in the 1848 Village Reports,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), July 12, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/nogai-encounters-memories-in-1848.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 1 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accuarte and carefully considered. ~ANF American Mennonite leaders who supported Trump will be responding to the election results in the near future. Sometimes a template or sample conference address helps to formulate one’s own text. To that end I offer the following. When Hitler came to power in 1933, Mennonites in Germany sent official greetings by telegram: “The Conference of the East and West Prussian Mennonites meeting today at Tiegenhagen in the Free City of Danzig are deeply grateful for the tremendous uprising ( Erhebung ) that God has given our people ( Volk ) through the vigor and action of [unclear], and promise our cooperation in the construction of our Fatherland, true to the Gospel motto of [our founder Menno Simons], ‘For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.’” ( Note 1 ) Hitler responded in a letter...

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

Anti-Jewish Pogroms and Mennonite responses in Einlage (1905) and Sagradovka (1899)

Below are stories of two pogroms and of the responses in two Mennonite communities in Ukraine/Russia. The first location is Einlage (Chortitza) in 1905, with two episodes. The rage of peasants and the working class exploded with strikes, bloody revolts, chaos and plundering across the land, especially on the estates early in 1905. The Greater Zaporozhzhia-Alexandrovsk economic zone, with larger Mennonite manufacturers of agricultural machinery in Einlage as well, was a centre for some of that labour unrest ( note 1 ). In the shadows of the larger March 1905 Russian Revolution, there were so-called provocateurs named the "Black Hundred" ( note 2 ) who organized pogroms across Russia, but especially in ethnic Ukrainian and Polish areas. “Jewish stores, shops, and homes were broken into, robbed, and plundered; Jewish women and girls were raped and brutally murdered. Many Jews lost not only their belongings in Russia, but also their lives. And all with impunity. The police ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

1873: First Russian Mennonites leave for North America

On February 4, 1873, ministers and elders held a special meeting in Elder Isaak Peters’ Pordenau Molotschna church ( note 1 ). It was a larger building with balcony, constructed in 1860 after the original 1828 stone church building had been torn down. They had put down deep roots in Russia; nonetheless Peters spoke strongly in favour of emigration and supported a decision to send land scouts to America. The team was given a mandate to negotiate for the possibility of some 50 to 60,000 Mennonite immigrants ( note 2 ). Eager to compete with the United States for settlers, the Canadian government passed an Order-in-Council on March 3, 1873 to create a Mennonite reservation of nine-and-one-third townships ( note 3 ). The twelve-member deputation—including two Molotschna elders—which had been sent to North America returned in September with a favourable report ( note 4 ). Despite divergent opinions on the ground, the first hundred Russian Mennonite agriculturalists arrived in the United...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Why Danzig and Poland?

In the late 16th century, Poland became a haven for a variety of non-conformists which included Jews, Anti-Trinitarians from Italy and Bohemia, Quakers and Calvinists from Great Britain, south German Schwenkfelders, Eastern Orthodox, Armenian, and Greek Catholic Christians, some Muslim Tatars, as well as other peaceful sectarians like the Dutch and Flemish Anabaptists. Unlike the Low Countries and most of western Europe, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was a “state without stakes,” and as such fittingly described as “God’s playground” ( note 1 ). In the view of 17th-century Dutch dramatist Joost van den Vondel, it was “the ‘Promised Land,’ where the refugee could forget all his sorrow and enjoy the richness of the land” ( note 2 ). Over the next two centuries an important strand of Mennonite life and spirituality evolved into a mature tradition in this relatively hospitable context ( note 3 ). Anabaptists from the Low Countries began to arrive in Danzig and region as early as 15...