Skip to main content

Nogai Encounters: Memories in the 1848 Village Reports

Biographies, memoirs, interviews, and diaries inevitably include and often exaggerate those parts of the life-story that support the claim of the storyteller, and omit or flatten other parts assumed to be irrelevant or in contradiction to the preferred storyline.

In 1848, the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Colonists President Eugen von Hahn tasked each village administration to work with the schoolteacher to produce an exact historical description of its settlement and key events in its history (note 1). Notably most village histories are silent or say very little about their engagements with their Nogai neighbours whom they had displaced.

Mennonites were fully aware that their colony on the Molotschna River was on lands of the nomadic Nogai, and that the Nogai had been forcibly displaced for Greater Russia’s colonizing program. This earlier history of the land is noted in a few village reports.

“In this location there used to be a large Nogai village. By order of authorities the Nogai moved away in 1805 and settled in a distance of 12 versts from here and further.” (Lindenau, 99)

“On the location of the present village of Altona there were once the tent dwellings of the Nogai, the traces of which can still be seen today [1848] in some raised earthen and dung walls.” (Altona, 115)

“Since the Nogai who lived here do not have houses, but only beehive-like tent huts made of sticks and felt blankets, so-called 'Koschen' [which they transported on their two-wheeled carts from place to place], the first [foreign] settlers found no shelter here, and for the first winter set up earthen huts.” [Before the arrival of Mennonites]“… the Nogai swarmed about with their herds on the open, treeless steppe.” (Muntau, 95; 94; Lindenau, 99)

“The nomadic Tatars who used this steppe had to evacuate the area by order of the authorities when the Germans [Mennonites] arrived, but they remained dangerous neighbours” (Rosenort, 126; 128).

“The village land was originally occupied by [Nogai cattle-herd owners] who vacated the settlement but remained neighbours.” (Blumenort, 128)

“There were no houses in the area, only nomadic Nogai moved from place to place with their felt huts (called Kibitki) to let their herds graze the best possible pasture.” (Ohrloff, 162)

“The village was founded in 1821 … The land was uninhabited at that time and was grazed by the cattle herds of the neighbouring Russians and Nogai people.” (Gnadenheim, 144)

Because the nomadic Nogai constructed no permanent buildings, even their “best” grazing lands and temporary village lands were considered “unoccupied” or “empty.” Their presence was like a “swarm” of unwelcome steppe creatures that come and go, and their “evacuation,” displacement and containment was remembered as part of the state’s civilizing agenda. Mennonites understood their role as a positive force for this vision of colonization.

The recollections of encounter with the Nogai were consistently negative and paternalistic in the Mennonite village histories.

“[Our] interactions were mostly around horses: the old and useless ones they bought for slaughter, and the best ones they stole.” (Blumenort, 128)

“At first the Nogai people were very obstructive to the newcomers in their economic endeavours; they not only disturbed the work in the fields, but also robbed the few horses that one already had. Whatever else the bandits could get their hands on from the herds also disappeared. Most thefts usually occurred in the sowing season.” (Ohrloff, 161; 162)

“Violence and theft were initially perpetrated by the Nogai neighbours. On April 23, 1811, Jakob Friesen, a farmer in this village, was attacked on the steppe and almost beaten to death with hammers. Colonists however rushed to save him from certain death. Horse thefts were particularly common, causing some colonists to lose fortunes in one night. In April 1813, ten of the best horses were taken by force in one night.” (Schönau, 97f.)

Typical was Altona—the Mennonite village closest to the Nogai lands south of Molotschna. Altona resident and District Mayor Klaas Wiens and Secretary Aron Warkentin changed the original name of the village from Altonau to Altona; they explained that it was a mix of Low German and High German words: “alto” (e.g., “all too”) and “nah” (or close), that is: “all too near” to “the still-feared indigenous Nogai herdsmen,” as the village history recalls (Altona, 114).

In 1808 the Nogai were “induced” to build villages, settle permanently and renounce robbery. An “advance in civilization” was slow, according to another (non-Mennonite) account in 1838. “In short, they are a people only emerging from barbarism, and have as yet made but the first step towards habitual industry” (note 2). While Mennonites were rightly worried about horse theft, it is not surprising that land surveyors were not welcomed by the Nogai.

“A particularly sad event hit this village [Rosenort] in 1811 in the night from April 19 to 20. The settler Jakob Berg, who was a district secretary, Jakob Wiens, son of Klaas Wiens, and a stranger named Dirk Reimer, rode across the steppe in the evening on colony business to advance the surveying of the land. They were attacked and murdered by Tartars. The next day their corpses were found on the steppe designated to the village of Tiege. When the stolen items were identified the murderers were discovered.” (Rosenort, 126)

A few villages established in the 1820s and ‘30s note that the still “empty” Molotschna colony lands were leased by leaders Johann Cornies or Klaas Wiens and then rented back to the Nogai for grazing “for a monthly payment” (Lichtfelde, 188; see also Schardau, Elisabethtal, etc.). While Cornies and colony coffers benefitted from this arrangement, the Nogai did not.

The graciousness of the “nation’s father” is remembered in village names (Gnadenheim, 144), but not the Nogai who shared land and labour with them.

By 1848 the wealth and prosperity of Mennonite villages was enabled by new markets available with the construction of the port of Berdyansk. That Nogai lands were also expropriated for the port city is not mentioned in the village histories, nor the fact that many Nogai wagonners were contracted to cart Mennonite grain to the port.

“Another extremely important event for this area is the establishment of the seaside town of Berdyansk, for which we feel deeply indebted to the high government” (Halbstadt, 91). A footnote added by a later German editor explains that “Berdyansk—a port city since 1837—was founded in 1827 on the site of the former Nogai settlement of Kotur Ogu, and offered colonists the opportunity to export grain abroad, which resulted in a transformation of their entire economy.”

The village reports were written a few months after Johann Cornies' unexpected and early death in 1848. Cornies' relationship with the Nogai was of a different scale and very complex. The survey above however offers a broader account of how Molotschna Mennonites as such remembered and spoke of their Nogai neighbours with whom they shared the land. The stories support the narrative of success and prosperity of Mennonites as model colonists on “empty” lands, and omit or flatten other parts as irrelevant—the Nogai encounters, their forced displacement, and labour.

Perhaps these histories are helpful for understanding later Mennonite engagements with Indigenous peoples in North and South America as well.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Drawings are from Jean de Baron Reuilly, Travels in the Crimea, and Along the Shores of the Black Sea, Performed During the Year 1803, translated from the French (London: R. Phillips, 1807), 55, https://archive.org/details/b29345340_0014/page/54/mode/2up. See other images in previous posts: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/islamic-nogai-neighbours.html (and forthcoming).

Note 1: Evgenii von Hahn, “Zirkularaufforderung 43 an sämtliche Schulzenämter und Schullehrer (January 8, 1848),” in Josef A. Malinowsky, Die Planerkolonien am Asowschen Meere, Appendix IV, 85–86 (Stuttgart: Ausland und Heimat Verlag, 1928), 85-86, https://chortitza.org/kb/malinows.pdf. All of the village histories /quotes in this post come from the collection by Margarete Woltner, ed., Die Gemeindeberichte von 1848 der deutschen Siedlungen am Schwarzen Meer (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1941), https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/kb/woltner.pdf.

Note 2: See the 1838 English summary and review of Daniel Schlatter’s “Life among the Tatars” (Bruchstücke aus einigen Reisen nach dem südlichen Rußland in den Jahren 1822 bis 1828) in The Athenaeum, no. 553 (June 2, 1838), 388, https://archive.org/details/sim_athenaeum-uk_1838-06-02_553/page/388/mode/2up. Schlatter’s volume: https://www.e-rara.ch/zuz/content/zoom/7881850.

---
To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Nogai Encounters: Memories in the 1848 Village Reports,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), July 12, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/nogai-encounters-memories-in-1848.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Invitation to the Russian Consulate, Danzig, January 19, 1788

B elow is one of the most important original Mennonite artifacts I have seen. It concerns January 19. The two land scouts Jacob Höppner and Johann Bartsch had returned to Danzig from Russia on November 10, 1787 with the Russian Immigration Agent, Georg von Trappe. Soon thereafter, Trappe had copies of the royal decree and agreement (Gnadenbrief) printed for distribution in the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig and other locations, dated December 29, 1787 ( see pic ; note 1 ). After the flyer was handed out to congregants in Danzig after worship on January 13, 1788, city councilors made the most bitter accusations against church elders for allowing Trappe and the Russian Consulate to do this; something similar had happened before ( note 2 ). In the flyer Trappe boasted that land scouts Höppner and Bartsch met not only with Gregory Potemkin, Catherine the Great’s vice-regent and administrator of New Russia, but also with “the Most Gracious Russian Monarch” herse...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...

Becoming German: Ludendorff Festivals in Molotschna, 1918

During the friendly German military occupation of Ukraine at the end of WWI, patriotic “Ludendorff Festivals” were encouraged by German forces to raise funds to support injured German soldiers. A first such festival in the Molotschna was held on June 25, 1918 in Ohrloff, and was attended by “a great many German officers, soldiers and colonists with music, [patriotic] speeches and social interaction” From the perspective of the German army press, the event was “extremely enjoyable;” it was accompanied with music by a 30-piece regiment orchestra, and beer, sausage, sandwiches, ice-cream, raspberries and cherries were sold. It closed with a “small dance,” raising 7,387 rubles or 9,850 German marks in donations ( note 1 ). Later that summer, a Ludendorff Festival in Halbstadt began with Sunday worship, followed by an early concert, games and performances by the Selbstschutz , as well as “entertainment and merriment of every kind,” with short plays and dancing into the morning ( note ...

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...