Skip to main content

Nogai Encounters: Memories in the 1848 Village Reports

Biographies, memoirs, interviews, and diaries inevitably include and often exaggerate those parts of the life-story that support the claim of the storyteller, and omit or flatten other parts assumed to be irrelevant or in contradiction to the preferred storyline.

In 1848, the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Colonists President Eugen von Hahn tasked each village administration to work with the schoolteacher to produce an exact historical description of its settlement and key events in its history (note 1). Notably most village histories are silent or say very little about their engagements with their Nogai neighbours whom they had displaced.

Mennonites were fully aware that their colony on the Molotschna River was on lands of the nomadic Nogai, and that the Nogai had been forcibly displaced for Greater Russia’s colonizing program. This earlier history of the land is noted in a few village reports.

“In this location there used to be a large Nogai village. By order of authorities the Nogai moved away in 1805 and settled in a distance of 12 versts from here and further.” (Lindenau, 99)

“On the location of the present village of Altona there were once the tent dwellings of the Nogai, the traces of which can still be seen today [1848] in some raised earthen and dung walls.” (Altona, 115)

“Since the Nogai who lived here do not have houses, but only beehive-like tent huts made of sticks and felt blankets, so-called 'Koschen' [which they transported on their two-wheeled carts from place to place], the first [foreign] settlers found no shelter here, and for the first winter set up earthen huts.” [Before the arrival of Mennonites]“… the Nogai swarmed about with their herds on the open, treeless steppe.” (Muntau, 95; 94; Lindenau, 99)

“The nomadic Tatars who used this steppe had to evacuate the area by order of the authorities when the Germans [Mennonites] arrived, but they remained dangerous neighbours” (Rosenort, 126; 128).

“The village land was originally occupied by [Nogai cattle-herd owners] who vacated the settlement but remained neighbours.” (Blumenort, 128)

“There were no houses in the area, only nomadic Nogai moved from place to place with their felt huts (called Kibitki) to let their herds graze the best possible pasture.” (Ohrloff, 162)

“The village was founded in 1821 … The land was uninhabited at that time and was grazed by the cattle herds of the neighbouring Russians and Nogai people.” (Gnadenheim, 144)

Because the nomadic Nogai constructed no permanent buildings, even their “best” grazing lands and temporary village lands were considered “unoccupied” or “empty.” Their presence was like a “swarm” of unwelcome steppe creatures that come and go, and their “evacuation,” displacement and containment was remembered as part of the state’s civilizing agenda. Mennonites understood their role as a positive force for this vision of colonization.

The recollections of encounter with the Nogai were consistently negative and paternalistic in the Mennonite village histories.

“[Our] interactions were mostly around horses: the old and useless ones they bought for slaughter, and the best ones they stole.” (Blumenort, 128)

“At first the Nogai people were very obstructive to the newcomers in their economic endeavours; they not only disturbed the work in the fields, but also robbed the few horses that one already had. Whatever else the bandits could get their hands on from the herds also disappeared. Most thefts usually occurred in the sowing season.” (Ohrloff, 161; 162)

“Violence and theft were initially perpetrated by the Nogai neighbours. On April 23, 1811, Jakob Friesen, a farmer in this village, was attacked on the steppe and almost beaten to death with hammers. Colonists however rushed to save him from certain death. Horse thefts were particularly common, causing some colonists to lose fortunes in one night. In April 1813, ten of the best horses were taken by force in one night.” (Schönau, 97f.)

Typical was Altona—the Mennonite village closest to the Nogai lands south of Molotschna. Altona resident and District Mayor Klaas Wiens and Secretary Aron Warkentin changed the original name of the village from Altonau to Altona; they explained that it was a mix of Low German and High German words: “alto” (e.g., “all too”) and “nah” (or close), that is: “all too near” to “the still-feared indigenous Nogai herdsmen,” as the village history recalls (Altona, 114).

In 1808 the Nogai were “induced” to build villages, settle permanently and renounce robbery. An “advance in civilization” was slow, according to another (non-Mennonite) account in 1838. “In short, they are a people only emerging from barbarism, and have as yet made but the first step towards habitual industry” (note 2). While Mennonites were rightly worried about horse theft, it is not surprising that land surveyors were not welcomed by the Nogai.

“A particularly sad event hit this village [Rosenort] in 1811 in the night from April 19 to 20. The settler Jakob Berg, who was a district secretary, Jakob Wiens, son of Klaas Wiens, and a stranger named Dirk Reimer, rode across the steppe in the evening on colony business to advance the surveying of the land. They were attacked and murdered by Tartars. The next day their corpses were found on the steppe designated to the village of Tiege. When the stolen items were identified the murderers were discovered.” (Rosenort, 126)

A few villages established in the 1820s and ‘30s note that the still “empty” Molotschna colony lands were leased by leaders Johann Cornies or Klaas Wiens and then rented back to the Nogai for grazing “for a monthly payment” (Lichtfelde, 188; see also Schardau, Elisabethtal, etc.). While Cornies and colony coffers benefitted from this arrangement, the Nogai did not.

The graciousness of the “nation’s father” is remembered in village names (Gnadenheim, 144), but not the Nogai who shared land and labour with them.

By 1848 the wealth and prosperity of Mennonite villages was enabled by new markets available with the construction of the port of Berdyansk. That Nogai lands were also expropriated for the port city is not mentioned in the village histories, nor the fact that many Nogai wagonners were contracted to cart Mennonite grain to the port.

“Another extremely important event for this area is the establishment of the seaside town of Berdyansk, for which we feel deeply indebted to the high government” (Halbstadt, 91). A footnote added by a later German editor explains that “Berdyansk—a port city since 1837—was founded in 1827 on the site of the former Nogai settlement of Kotur Ogu, and offered colonists the opportunity to export grain abroad, which resulted in a transformation of their entire economy.”

The village reports were written a few months after Johann Cornies' unexpected and early death in 1848. Cornies' relationship with the Nogai was of a different scale and very complex. The survey above however offers a broader account of how Molotschna Mennonites as such remembered and spoke of their Nogai neighbours with whom they shared the land. The stories support the narrative of success and prosperity of Mennonites as model colonists on “empty” lands, and omit or flatten other parts as irrelevant—the Nogai encounters, their forced displacement, and labour.

Perhaps these histories are helpful for understanding later Mennonite engagements with Indigenous peoples in North and South America as well.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Drawings are from Jean de Baron Reuilly, Travels in the Crimea, and Along the Shores of the Black Sea, Performed During the Year 1803, translated from the French (London: R. Phillips, 1807), 55, https://archive.org/details/b29345340_0014/page/54/mode/2up. See other images in previous posts: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/islamic-nogai-neighbours.html (and forthcoming).

Note 1: Evgenii von Hahn, “Zirkularaufforderung 43 an sämtliche Schulzenämter und Schullehrer (January 8, 1848),” in Josef A. Malinowsky, Die Planerkolonien am Asowschen Meere, Appendix IV, 85–86 (Stuttgart: Ausland und Heimat Verlag, 1928), 85-86, https://chortitza.org/kb/malinows.pdf. All of the village histories /quotes in this post come from the collection by Margarete Woltner, ed., Die Gemeindeberichte von 1848 der deutschen Siedlungen am Schwarzen Meer (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1941), https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/kb/woltner.pdf.

Note 2: See the 1838 English summary and review of Daniel Schlatter’s “Life among the Tatars” (Bruchstücke aus einigen Reisen nach dem südlichen Rußland in den Jahren 1822 bis 1828) in The Athenaeum, no. 553 (June 2, 1838), 388, https://archive.org/details/sim_athenaeum-uk_1838-06-02_553/page/388/mode/2up. Schlatter’s volume: https://www.e-rara.ch/zuz/content/zoom/7881850.

---
To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Nogai Encounters: Memories in the 1848 Village Reports,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), July 12, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/nogai-encounters-memories-in-1848.html. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

"Between Monarchs" a lot can happen (like revolt). A Mennonite "Accession" Prayer for the Monarch

It is surprising for many to learn that Russian Mennonites sang the Russian national anthem "God save the Tsar" in special worship services ... frequently! We have a "Mennonite prayer" and sermon sample for the accession of the monarch ( Thronbesteigung ) or its anniversary, with closing prayer-- and another Mennonite sampler of a coronation ( Krönung ) prayer, sermon and closing prayer ( note 1 ). After 70 years with one monarch, the manual is made for a time like this--try sharing it with your Canadian Mennonite pastor ;) Technically there is no “between” monarchs: “The Queen is Dead. Long live the King!” But there is much that happens or can happen before the coronation of the new monarch. Including revolt. Mennonites in Molotschna had hosted Tsar Alexander I shortly before his death in 1825. Upon his death in December, Alexander's brother and heir Constantine declined succession, and prior to the coronation of the next brother Nicholas, some 3,000 rebel (mos...

Mennonite Medical Orderlies in World War I

Russia declared war on Germany on July 20, 1914. Mennonite ministers and civic leaders met on July 22, and called for the extension of their community’s alternative service agreement beyond forestry service: to form complete medical units to gather the wounded from the front and to transport them by hospital trains to interior hospitals; to establish special hospital facilities for the wounded in the colonies; to fundraise large sums for the Red Cross; and to grant financial aid to families of soldiers ( note 1 ). Mennonites knew that they would have to prove their patriotism in positive and tangible ways in order to retain property rights and privileges. Abraham Kröker, editor of the Friedensstimme , wrote just before the start of the war: “Do we not owe it our government and Russian neighbours to show that if a war … broke out, we would be ready to serve the interests of the Fatherland [Russia], and to help the needy?” D. H. Epp, editor of Der Botschafter , wrote: “We need to show ...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Life in Exin, 1944: German-Occupied Poland

After the 1943-44 portion of the Great Trek ended with settlement of some 35,000 Mennonites in German-annexed Poland, the Gnadenfeld area trek members were scattered in resettler camps ( Umsiedler-Lager ) around Exin ( Kcynia ) and the Altburgund District administrative centre of Dietfurt ( Żnin ), including the hamlets of Kiefernrode ( Słupowiec ), Schwarzerde ( Malice ), Schmiedebach, etc. ( note 1) . Until World War I, the area was part of the German-Prussian Province of Posen, about 170 kilometres south-west of Danzig ( Gdańsk ) and about 400 kilometres east of Berlin. Almost all ethnic German resettlers from Ukraine arrived through Litzmannstadt (Łódź), one of two entrance points from the east into new German province of “Warthegau” ( note 2) . Here thousands were cleansed, deloused and processed daily. Some Gnadenfeld group members were brought to Janowitz (Janowiec) , near Hermannsbad in the District of Hohensalza for quarantine. Here fresh straw was laid out on the floor for ...

Swiss and Palatinate Connections

Sometime after 1850 Andreas Plennert and his family immigrated to South Russia from the Culm Region of West Prussia. Though there was at least one Mennonite “Plehnert” who had already immigrated to Russia in 1793, it is not a very common Prussian-Russian Mennonite name. As such, however, it is easier to trace than many and offers a minority narrative and identity within the longer and broader Russian Mennonite story. The account below is adapted largely from information in Horst Penner, Die ost- und westpreußischen Mennoniten , vol. 1, though I have expanded upon his work to offer a slightly different narrative. In 1724 there was a group of Mennonites forced out of the Memel region in East Prussia for political and religious reasons and were given assistance to resettle back to West Prussia in areas populated by Mennonites. Among the 23 households that went to the Stuhm region there is one Plenert listed, namely Christian Plenert. We know that Mennonites entered the Memel region ...

Flooding and Mennonites: A Common Thread

In November 2021 many Mennonites in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia were impacted by disastrous flooding. The mayor of Abbotsford—the worst-hit city—as well as the local Member of Parliament were Mennonites. Many Mennonites across Canada had family members who are directly impacted.  Flood stories have been an important thread in the Prussian-Russian Mennonite story. How have Mennonites responded? Mutual aid stands out. For Menno Simons, it was “the only sign whereby a true Christian may be known” ( note 1 ).  In 1562, “Dutch people of the Mennonite religion” were specifically invited by the Polish banking house Loysen to settle on the “Tiegenhoff part of the Vistula Delta” to rebuild dikes partially destroyed by huge floods (1540 and 1543) and wars, and to drain low-lying lagoons and swamps over large blocks of land ( note 2 ). The Tiege River—a branch of the Vistula—was at or below sea level.  Dams and ditches along the Nogat and Vistula rivers had been construct...

Invitation to the Russian Consulate, Danzig, January 19, 1788

B elow is one of the most important original Mennonite artifacts I have seen. It concerns January 19. The two land scouts Jacob Höppner and Johann Bartsch had returned to Danzig from Russia on November 10, 1787 with the Russian Immigration Agent, Georg von Trappe. Soon thereafter, Trappe had copies of the royal decree and agreement (Gnadenbrief) printed for distribution in the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig and other locations, dated December 29, 1787 ( see pic ; note 1 ). After the flyer was handed out to congregants in Danzig after worship on January 13, 1788, city councilors made the most bitter accusations against church elders for allowing Trappe and the Russian Consulate to do this; something similar had happened before ( note 2 ). In the flyer Trappe boasted that land scouts Höppner and Bartsch met not only with Gregory Potemkin, Catherine the Great’s vice-regent and administrator of New Russia, but also with “the Most Gracious Russian Monarch” herse...

Russian Mennonites and German troop withdrawal, Advent 1918

First Advent, 1918: The last page of the final issue of the German military newspaper Deutsche Zeitung für Ost-Taurien ( DZOT ), informed readers of a German Catholic mass at the Mennonite Church in Melitopol (near the large Mennonite settlement of Molotschna) for 8 am, followed by a Protestant (Lutheran) Military Advent worship service at 9 am ( pic ), with the Mennonite worship service beginning at 11 am. A week earlier they had done the same to honour their fallen comrades on Eternity Sunday ( Totensonntag )—in the Mennonite worship space. The Mennonite colonists—“especially Molotschna”—became “trusted friends,” whose assistance, hospitality and German manner created a “second home” for the troops, who now understood that “they belong inseparably together as members of one people ( Stamm ),” according to the editor ( note 1; pic ). Not only did troops give away German books, refrigerators, phonographs, recordings, movie projectors, distillery equipment, typewriters, linens, fo...