Skip to main content

Anti-German Land Liquidation Legislation and Language Restrictions in Russia, 1914-16

In early July 1914, Mennonites knew war with Germany was imminent. Jacob Janzen’s diary (Rudnerweide) captures the feeling.

“Rumour has it that we will soon have war with Germany! On the 18th everybody had to take their horses to a farmyard at the end of the village, where they were registered and examined. Some were led aside right there and then. … The next day all available teams and wagons from Rudnerweide, Großweide, Konteniusfeld and Sparrau had to take 700 men of draft age, Russians, to the station, where they boarded a train for Melitopol. Our hired man went too.” (Note 1)

Suspicious about Mennonite loyalties, 2,350 guns were seized from 1,850 Russian Mennonite households—including 600 handguns or revolvers—in 1914 (note 2). A. A. Khvostov, Chair of the Russian Council of Ministers, surmised that “such large quantities of revolvers [seized] suggest that Mennonites intend to use their weapons for purposes other than hunting … ” (note 3).

Russia declared war on Germany on July 20, 1914. Mennonites knew that they would have to prove their patriotism in order to retain rights and privileges. The next day Memrik Elder Peter W. Janzen wrote to the majority Octobrist Party: “The enemies of the Russian Tsar and Russian State are our enemies, and the friends of Russia are our friends as well” (note 4).

On September 26, 1914 the government forbade the use of German in publications, on the street and even “in the house if a Russian is present” (note 5); the Mennonite paper Friedensstimme had to cease publication in November. According to estate owner Jacob C. Toews, “the war had just barely started when rumours … the police came and checked homes for papers and ammunition. … The Russian nobility supported such nonsense … goading the masses against us (note 6).

On October 9, 1914, the first land liquidation law was introduced in the Duma pertaining to land held by “enemy nationals” (note 7). Other restrictions were expanded in November. Janzen wrote in his diary:

“On November 10, 1914 an order came from the Governor-General with more restrictions for the German people: no more than one male could enter somebody else’s house, no talking in German in a public place, and no discussions about the poor, the government or the Russians and Slavs in general. Gatherings at funerals, weddings and hog butcherings are allowed, but have to be reported in advance. It’s really going from bad to worse” (note 8).

Russian nationalist newspapers started a campaign of slander and harassment against the German colonists as German sympathizers and enemies of the Russian state. They claimed that Germany had not only tracked the settlement of Germans in Russia, but also secretly directed their settlement with incentives and credits to purchase and settle in those areas potentially useful to Germany in war.

Anti-German pamphlets with the following titles were in broad circulation: “German Evil,” by M. Muravyov, “German Spies,” by A. Rezanova; “German Colonization in Southern Russia,” by S. Shelukhin, and “Peace: the conquest of Russia by the Germans,” by I. Sergeev (note 9). A pamphlet by Nikolai Polivanov, “On German Domination,” criticized extensive German land ownership and accused Russian Germans of espionage and of working hand-in-glove with the German embassy, business and banks (note 10).

With their survival as a distinct people in question, in November 1914 a pamphlet entitled “Who are the Mennonites?” (note 11) appeared anonymously (written primarily by archivist Peter J. Braun; note 12). It gave examples of Mennonite loyalty to Russia and sought to document the distinct Dutch ancestry of Mennonites—even claiming that “no German blood” flowed through the veins of Mennonites. The petition to St. Petersburg was accompanied by a bribe of one million rubles (=$421,940; note 13). Young Mennonites departing for their service assignments were also instructed to say that they were not German, but of Dutch origin (note 14).

During the 1914 Advent season restrictions around German language were expanded to include schools and church services. “Only singing and praying is still allowed in the German language. No letters are to be written in German anymore, not even to the next village,” Jacob Janzen recorded (note 15). Preaching in Russian, however, “exceeded in most cases the strength of the preachers and often also the understanding of the listeners,” according to one account (note 16).

The Germanic name of the country’s capital was changed to Petrograd, and all the Mennonite village names were changed as well: Schardau to Suworowka; Pordenau to Potjomkino; and Marienthal to Marjino (note 17).

The most draconian land expropriation and liquidation decrees were adopted in February and December 1915—“Regarding the Landed Property of the German Colonists,” and “Regarding Property of Hostile Foreigners and of the Colonists” (note 18). The new law did not apply if a person had become a member of the Orthodox faith, had a Slavic identity, or was a descendent of someone who has served in combat action on behalf of Russia. The expropriation law did however apply to Russian German or Austro-Hungarian landowners living within 150 versts (160 kilometres) of western borders, as well as those living 100 versts (107 kilometres) from the coast of the Black and Azov Seas, and all of the Crimean Peninsula. This included, for example, the entire Molotschna settlement area. A few days before the February law passed, some Mennonites gave the Tsar a “gift” of 30,000 rubles ($12,658) in hopes of an exemption, but the scheme was unsuccessful (note 19).

Some 200,000 Volhynia ethnic Germans on the insecure western border to Poland were already transported east in winter 1915–1916. Larger estate owners in southern Ukraine had their land and assets confiscated and made to look for shelter and livelihood in the colony villages (note 20).

While average-sized Mennonite farms were largely spared to ensure food supplies for the army (note 21), the regime had plans in place to deport all remaining ethnic Germans to the eastern parts of the empire if and when necessary (note 22).

On May 27, 1915, mobs in Moscow demolished and robbed 759 German houses and businesses, murdering three people and injuring 40. In August 1915, inflamed mobs demanded that German-born Empress Alexandra be shut up in a convent and tried for treason because of her German heritage. Germany concluded that Moscow and the pan-Slavists were waging a “racial war” against Germans in Ukraine “with hatred abysmally deep against everything German” (note 23).

As the war continued, the ban on German language was lifted after a few months of negotiations, but then reinstated in June 1916. The Russian government also planned to end the Mennonite option of non-combatant service, but this too was abandoned in October 1916 by the new Minister of the Interior, Alexander Protopopov, as a step to limit the growing tide of resentment against the Tsar (note 24).

Lists of every Molotschna Mennonite village farm, its size and name of owner were compiled and published in March 1916 in the Tauridia Provincial Gazette for liquidation (note 25). Landowners would be offered only 390 rubles ($165) paid out over 25 years for a farm valued between 15,000 to 30,000 rubles, according to the report; another account notes 25 to 50 rubles were given for land and buildings evaluated at 5,000 to 6,000 rubles before the war (note 26).

Mennonite leaders wrote their North American counterparts that a continued Mennonite existence in their “beloved Russia” might no longer be possible, and that their only hope was mass migration to North America immediately after the war (note 27). From an American perspective, the liquidation policy was all the more stunning given that Russian Mennonites were “in general more patriotic than would seem consistent with Mennonite principles” and their “loyalty to Russia is above all suspicion.”

Amidst considerable threats, uncertainty and restrictions, Mennonites carefully documented their history and highlighted their unique Low German identity to rebrand themselves in time of war. The strategy was to distance themselves on paper from all things Prussian, highlight their undeniable conservative political patriotism, and justify and protect their massive landholdings and wealth in light of their economic contributions.

But as their situation became more tenuous in 1918, many Mennonites began to place their hopes squarely upon Germany.

Years later in 1933 archivist Peter J. Braun wrote from (Nazi) Germany:

“Until the World War, I felt myself to be a Russian citizen; Germany was a foreign country to me. But the war brought one thing after another. The Russian intelligentsia decried us as ‘traitors’ in the press and vilified us; the government refused to protect us and instead passed the land liquidation laws … it became dreadfully clear to me: [the] Russian farmer, even though he may bear no personal animosity toward me, will not rest until he has driven the last German from his native soil and taken his place. … [we] had become strangers in the land.”(Note 28)

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Jacob P. Janzen, “Diary 1911–1919. English monthly summaries,” edited and translated by Katharina Wall Janzen. From Mennonite Heritage Archives (MHA), Jacob P. Janzen Fonds, 1911–1946, vol. 2341.

Note 2: Glenn Penner, trans., “Weapons Confiscated from Russian Mennonites in 1914,” St. Petersburg Archives, Fond 821, Opis 133, Delo 322, http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/Confiscated_Firearms_1914.pdf.

Note 3: Cited in Abraham Friesen, In Defense of Privilege. Russian Mennonites and the State Before and During World War I (Winnipeg, MB: Kindred, 2006), 236, https://archive.org/details/InDefenseOfPrivilegeOCRopt. Cf. experience of estate owner Jacob Toews (“Biography of Jacob Cornelius Toews, 1882–1968,” translated by Frieda Toews Baergen [Leamington: Essex-Kent Mennonite Historical Association], 15, https://www.ekmha.ca/collections/files/original/9856b7fca8c0ab6fdaa861245404166e.pdf).

Note 4: Peter W. Janzen, in Lindemann, “Report of the Central Committee of the Union of October 17 [Octobrists] on its activities, from October 1, 1913, to September 1, 1914” [Отчет Центрального комитета Союза 17 октября о его деятельности, с 1 октября 1913 года по 1 сентября 1914 года], Mennonitische Geschichte und Ahnenforschung, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/0v762.pdf.

Note 5: J. Janzen, “Diary 1911–1919.” Cf. also Christlicher Familienblatt 20 (1918), 103–106, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Pis/CFk18c.pdf.

Note 6: J. Toews, “Biography of Jacob Cornelius Toews 1882–1968,” 14f. [slightly edited]

Note 7: Cf. David G. Rempel, “The Expropriation of the German Colonists in South Russia during the Great War,” Journal of Modern History 4, no. 1 (March 1932), 52f. The land liquidation legislation became law on February 2, 1915, though it did not immediately apply to the Mennonite lands in South Russia.

Note 8: J. Janzen, “Diary 1911–1919.”

Note 9: Peter Franz, ed., “Antideutsche Kampagne während des Ersten Weltkriegs,” https://chortitza.org/FB/pfranz30.html.

Note 10: Nikolai Polivanov, On German Domination [О немецком засилии], 2nd edition (Petrograd, 1916), https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/vptk96.pdf.

Note 11: Peter J. Braun, Wer sind die Mennoniten?, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Pis/Braun1.pdf.

Note 12: For a more detailed study of these efforts, see A. Friesen, In Defence of Privilege, 174.

Note 13: J. Toews, “Biography of Jacob Cornelius Toews, 1882–1968,” 16.

Note 14: Abraham Friesen, “Heinrich J. Braun: Preacher, Entrepreneur, Servant of His People, 1873–1946,” in Shepherds, Servants and Prophets: Leadership Among the Russian Mennonites (ca. 1880–1960), edited by Harry Loewen, 21–46 (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2003), 35.

Note 15: J. Janzen, “Diary 1911–1919;” cf. Christlicher Familienkalender 20 (1918), 105f., 107.

Note 16: “Die südrussischen Mennoniten in der Kriegs- und Revolutionszeit,” Mennonitischer Rundschau 43, no. 27 (July 7, 1920), 12, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1920-07-07_43_27/page/12/mode/2up.

Note 17: During German occupation in World War II, the village names briefly returned to the German original.

Note 18: Karl Lindemann, “Die Unterdrückung der deutschen Bürger Rußlands durch die zarische Regierung,” Wolgadeutsche Monatshefte 2, no. 15–24 (August–September, 1923), http://wolgadeutsche.net/bibliothek/Lindemann_Die_Unterdrueckung.htm.Cf. also Abraham Kröker’s report on the liquidation laws in the Christlicher Familienkalender 20 (1918), 106f.; D. Rempel, “The Expropriation of the German Colonists in South Russia.”

Note 19: J. Toews, “Biography of Jacob Cornelius Toews, 1882–1968,” 16.

Note 20: Cf. Nicholas J. Fehderau, A Mennonite Estate Family in Southern Ukraine, 1904–1924, translated by Margaret Harder and Elenore Fehderau Fast; edited by Anne Konrad (Kitchener: Pandora, 2013), 173-175; J. Toews, “Biography of Jacob Cornelius Toews,” 16–17.

Note 21: Cf. Alfred Eisfeld, “Sowjetische Nationalitätenpolitik und die Deutschen in der Sowjetunion in den 1920er Jahrenm,” in Deutsche in Rubland und in der Sowjetunion 1914–1941, edited by A. Eisfeld, V. Herdt, and B. Meissner, 174–201 (Berlin: LIT, 2007). Government officials confiscated the estates of larger landholders in South Russia in the summer of 1916; cf. A. Friesen, “Heinrich J. Braun: Preacher, Entrepreneur, Servant,” 39f.

Note 22: J. Otto Pohl, Ethnic Cleansing in the USSR, 1937–1949 (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1999), 29.

Note 23: Otto Kessler, Die Ukraine. Beiträge zur Geschichte, Kultur und Volkswirtschaft (Munich: Lehmanns, 1916), 36.

Note 24: Lindemann, Von den deutschen Kolonisten in Russland, 32.

Note 25: For samples, see https://chortitza.org/FB/pfranz63.html; https://chortitza.org/FB/pfranz62.html; https://chortitza.org/FB/pfranz61.html; https://chortitza.org/FB/pfranz60.html; https://chortitza.org/FB/pfranz59.html; https://chortitza.org/FB/pfranz58.html; https://chortitza.org/FB/pfranz57.html; https://chortitza.org/FB/pfranz56.html; https://chortitza.org/FB/pfranz55.html; https://chortitza.org/FB/pfranz67.html; etc.

Note 26: J. Toews, “Biography of Jacob Cornelius Toews, 1882–1968,” 16.

Note 27: John Horsch, “Conditions among the Mennonites of Russia,” Gospel Herald 9, no. 16 (July 20, 1916), 301, with reference to two letters from Elder Heinrich Unruh, March 24 and 29, 1916, https://archive.org/details/gospelherald191609kauf/page/300/mode/2up. Reprinted in Mennonitische Blätter 63, no. 9 (September 1916), 66f., with editorial additions, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1914-1918/.

Note 28: P. Braun, cited in A. Friesen, In Defense of Privilege, 3.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Anti-German Land Liquidation and Language Restrictions in Russia, 1914-1916,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), July 25, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/anti-german-land-liquidation.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Invitation to the Russian Consulate, Danzig, January 19, 1788

B elow is one of the most important original Mennonite artifacts I have seen. It concerns January 19. The two land scouts Jacob Höppner and Johann Bartsch had returned to Danzig from Russia on November 10, 1787 with the Russian Immigration Agent, Georg von Trappe. Soon thereafter, Trappe had copies of the royal decree and agreement (Gnadenbrief) printed for distribution in the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig and other locations, dated December 29, 1787 ( see pic ; note 1 ). After the flyer was handed out to congregants in Danzig after worship on January 13, 1788, city councilors made the most bitter accusations against church elders for allowing Trappe and the Russian Consulate to do this; something similar had happened before ( note 2 ). In the flyer Trappe boasted that land scouts Höppner and Bartsch met not only with Gregory Potemkin, Catherine the Great’s vice-regent and administrator of New Russia, but also with “the Most Gracious Russian Monarch” herse...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Between Monarchs" a lot can happen (like revolt). A Mennonite "Accession" Prayer for the Monarch

It is surprising for many to learn that Russian Mennonites sang the Russian national anthem "God save the Tsar" in special worship services ... frequently! We have a "Mennonite prayer" and sermon sample for the accession of the monarch ( Thronbesteigung ) or its anniversary, with closing prayer-- and another Mennonite sampler of a coronation ( Krönung ) prayer, sermon and closing prayer ( note 1 ). After 70 years with one monarch, the manual is made for a time like this--try sharing it with your Canadian Mennonite pastor ;) Technically there is no “between” monarchs: “The Queen is Dead. Long live the King!” But there is much that happens or can happen before the coronation of the new monarch. Including revolt. Mennonites in Molotschna had hosted Tsar Alexander I shortly before his death in 1825. Upon his death in December, Alexander's brother and heir Constantine declined succession, and prior to the coronation of the next brother Nicholas, some 3,000 rebel (mos...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...
Post a Comment
Read more

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (Holodomor), 1932-1933

In 2008 the Canadian Parliament passed an act declaring the fourth Saturday in November as “Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (‘Holodomor’) Memorial Day” ( note 1 ). Southern Ukraine was arguably the worst affected region of the famine of 1932–33, where 30,000 to 40,000 Mennonites lived ( note 2 ). The number of famine-related deaths in Ukraine during this period are conservatively estimated at 3.5 million ( note 3 ). In the early 1930s Stalin feared growing “Ukrainian nationalism” and the possibility of “losing Ukraine” ( note 4 ). He was also suspicious of ethnic Poles and Germans—like Mennonites—in Ukraine, convinced of the “existence of an organized counter-revolutionary insurgent underground” in support of Ukrainian national independence ( note 5 ). Ukraine was targeted with a “lengthy schooling” designed to ruthlessly break the threat of Ukrainian nationalism and resistance, and this included Ukraine’s Mennonites (viewed simply as “Germans”). Various causes combined to bring on w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...
Post a Comment
Read more

Four-Part Singing in Mennonite Schools and Church in Russia

The significance of singing instruction may seem trite, but it became a key vehicle in the Mennonite school curriculum for fostering a basic appreciation of the arts and for faith formation. In Johann Cornies’ circulated guidelines for teachers, singing was recommended as a means “to stimulate and enliven pious feelings” in the children—a guideline he copied directly from a German Catholic pedagogue and circulated freely under his own name ( note 1 ).  On January 26, 1846 Cornies distributed a curriculum regulation to all schools that mandated “singing by numbers ( Zahlen ) from the church hymnal” ( note 2 ). Attention to singing instruction in the schools precipitated significant and controversial changes in Mennonite liturgy. An 1854 visiting observer to the Bergthal Colony—a Chortitza daughter colony outside of Cornies’ purview—wrote: “Endlessly long hymns from the Gesangbuch (hymnal) were begun by the Vorsänger (song leader) of the congregation, and sung with so many flo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Becoming German: Ludendorff Festivals in Molotschna, 1918

During the friendly German military occupation of Ukraine at the end of WWI, patriotic “Ludendorff Festivals” were encouraged by German forces to raise funds to support injured German soldiers. A first such festival in the Molotschna was held on June 25, 1918 in Ohrloff, and was attended by “a great many German officers, soldiers and colonists with music, [patriotic] speeches and social interaction” From the perspective of the German army press, the event was “extremely enjoyable;” it was accompanied with music by a 30-piece regiment orchestra, and beer, sausage, sandwiches, ice-cream, raspberries and cherries were sold. It closed with a “small dance,” raising 7,387 rubles or 9,850 German marks in donations ( note 1 ). Later that summer, a Ludendorff Festival in Halbstadt began with Sunday worship, followed by an early concert, games and performances by the Selbstschutz , as well as “entertainment and merriment of every kind,” with short plays and dancing into the morning ( note ...
Post a Comment
Read more