Too lazy to go to church? You could be fined!

In New Russia church attendance for foreign colonists was obligatory.
Colonists were required to take the religious commandments and teachings of their tradition to heart, and to follow them scrupulously.
If a colonist was uninterested or “lazy” with regard to church attendance, there could be trouble. First they received a warning; after the third offence the colonist could be fined. After that, the fine is doubled, and the person would be required to do a full day of community service as punishment (note 1).

This policy for foreign settlers was enforced. The circular distributed to the German Lutheran and Catholic villages of the Sarata Colony, Bessarabia (near Crimea) in 1844 and 1845 is highly detailed (see below). The document contents are included in the historical collection of Mennonite leader Benjamin Unruh (note 2).

In the circular letter from the Sarata district mayor, the policy above is quoted with some angry words about how lazy and disobedient people had been in the past year (1845). Church attendance was sometimes very pitiful in Sarata, with only 3 to 6 adult worshipers. On one Sunday, 4 wagons passed the pastor going in the other direction! To address this, the district office chose to forbid anyone from entering or leaving the colony after 8 am on Sunday.

For the Mennonite colonies no similar document on church attendance has been identified yet; however we know that the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Colonists intervened in Mennonite church affairs on more than a few occasions. Under Johann Cornies, chairman of the powerful Agricultural Society, a church elder was disposed and his congregation dismantled (note 3).

In another case, Guardianship Committee President von Hahn and Cornies pressured three elders and fourteen ministers to sign a letter drafted by Cornies’ office declaring a new elder “unworthy of his office and demanding him not to officiate any longer.” The offending Elder Heinrich Wiens was to be removed for resettlement to Siberia, but managed to flee to Prussia after almost three months house arrest in the German village of Prischib (note 4).

   The state's expectation of the various non-Orthodox religious institutions was to instill moral behaviour and social discipline to their own people, which would in turn guarantee public order. The state sponsored these goals, for example, with generous financial assistance for the construction of the first Molotschna church buildings, as in Rudnerweide (10,000 Rubles Banko; note 5).
   Robert Crews’ analysis is correct, I think:
“Imperial confessional identities were reshaped through the pursuit of religious goals within the framework of tsarist laws and institutions. … Police intervention on behalf of the state and true religion bound … non-Orthodox [faiths] to the tsarist political order, transforming both.” (Note 6)
   The larger goal (of which the fines are only one part) was to guide the community (e.g., the Mennonite community) to faithfully remake itself and promote “new visions of religious orthodoxy” while—if we use Crews’ lens—“deepening their integration in, and subordination to, the expanding institutions of the empire” (note 7).
   It is helpful to see the actions of Johann Cornies from this perspective: his role was to implant Mennonitism successfully into the state; in turn, the state functioned as a guardian of Mennonite orthodoxy—e.g., as model people, as a light on a hill, etc., arguably consistent with the tradition.
   There are many examples of the state wanting Mennonites to become better, truer Mennonites (and the same for German Lutherans, for example). The “confessional, imperial state” understood itself as the protector of true religion, and when necessary addressed threats “from within the camp of believers themselves. Rather than disrupt imperial rule, the pursuit of [e.g., Mennonite, Lutheran or Islamic] orthodoxy formed an essential foundation of tsarist state-building on the southern frontiers of the empire” (note 8)—using Crews’ language.

Some extreme forms of discipline—Siberian exile—remained a punitive option for religious dissidents even after legal reforms in 1861 (note 9). The early Mennonite Brethren secessionists were threatened with this possibility. According to State Counsellor Busch “… when Molotschna Mennonites were asked what should be done with the sectarians [Mennonite Brethren], they answered” (consistent with Russian law and precedent) “that the only option is to banish the leaders from the Russian empire, and to send those ensnared by them to the outer regions of the empire, to settle them on the Amur River or in the Caucasus.” Some were imprisoned locally—a preferred strategy in Chortitza—and a few banished beyond the empire; those who returned were imprisoned in Siberia until they “opened their hearts to the voice of truth and recanted from their errors” (note 10).

In these examples it is not a stretch to speak of “imperial Mennonitism,” with the Tsar as patron and guardian.

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: “Extract from Domestic Adjustment Administration of New-Russian Foreign Colonies, Sec. 1.1: On the Religious Duties of the Colonists,” Konrad Keller, The German Colonies in South Russia: 1804 to 1904: Volume I and Volume II, trans. A. Becker (Lincoln, NB: American Historical Society of Germans from Russia, 1968; 1973), 52; GER: Die deutschen Kolonien in Südrussland, vol. 1 (Odessa: Stadelmeier, 1905), 61, https://books.google.com/books?id=YwvvjnJOENUC&pg=PR1#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Note 2: “An die Schulzengerichte des Sarataer Gebietsamtes von Sarataer Gebietsamt, July 31, 1846 [?],” in Benjamin H. Unruh Collection, Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace. From Mennonite Library and Archives--Bethel College, B. H. Unruh Collection MS. 295, Folder 14. https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_295/folder_14/SKMBT_C35107061313230_0030.jpg.
Note 3: See previous posts, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/religious-toleration-in-new-russia-and.html.
Note 4: H. Neufeld, “Report Regarding the Exile of Jakob Warkentin, Altona, Molotschna,” translated by Ben Hoeppner. 13, 14, 15 [15; 17] https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/sa_2_1171/; Tagebuch von Jakob Wall 1824–1859. Part II. Jacob Wall fonds vol. 1086, file 5a. From Mennonite Heritage Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Part II, June 3, 1847, https://chortitza.org/Eich/WallOr2.htm. Further details in Peter M. Friesen, The Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia 1789–1910 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978), https://archive.org/details/TheMennoniteBrotherhoodInRussia17891910/.

Note 5: "Rudnerweide," in Margarete Woltner, ed., Die Gemeindeberichte von 1848 der deutschen Siedlungen am Schwarzen Meer (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1941), 138, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/kb/woltner.pdf.

Note 6: Robert D. Crews, “Empire and the Confessional State: Islam and Religious Politics in Nineteenth-Century Russia,” American Historical Review 108, no. 1 (2003), 50–83; 83. See also Crews, For Prophet and Tsar: Islam and Empire in Russia and Central Asia (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009). Also: Paul Werth, The Tsar’s foreign faiths. Toleration and the fate of religious freedom in imperial Russia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
Note 7: Crews, “Empire and Confessional State,” 54.
Note 8: Crews, “Empire and Confessional State,” 57.

Note 9: Cf. A. Rasin, editer and translator, Sammlung der Gesetze und Verordnungen der Staatsregierung bezüglich der Organisation der Lebensverhältnisse der auf Kronsländereien angesiedelten Landbesitzer (bisherigen Kolonisten) (St. Petersburg, 1871), par. 54.5, 37, 39, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/vpetk232.pdf. Cf. also D. Myeshkov, Die Schawarzmeerdeutschen und ihre Welten: 1781–1871 (Essen: Klartext, 2008) 426–435. Further details in Friesen, Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia.

Note 10: E. H. Busch, ed., Ergänzungen der Materialien zur Geschichte und Statistik des Kirchen- und Schulwesens der Ev.-Luth. Gemeinden in Russland, vol. 1 (St. Petersburg: Gustav Haessel, 1867), 259f., https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_V9IMAQAAMAAJ.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Too lazy to go to church? You could be fined!,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), June 15, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/06/too-lazy-to-go-to-church-you-could-be.html.

Comments

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia: “We cordially plead ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog