Skip to main content

Heinrich J. Bräul, Teacher, 1843-1899

Heinrich Jacob Bräul was a village teacher in Pordenau and Rudnerweide, Molotschna—and my great-grandfather. While we have almost no family source material, here is an attempt to piece together his life in a manner which may give some profile to Russian Mennonite life in the “golden era.”

Heinrich was born in 1843 in Rudnerweide where his father Jacob was a recognized bilingual schoolmaster as well as a master painter.

In 1855 his father wrote an essay on school discipline for the Molotschna School Association, and in 1856 an essay on the moral condition of their village (note 1). These documents paints a positive picture of Heinrich’s school, home and village life. As the son of a teacher, the family was landless and generally poor; in his old age his father “lived under the most dire circumstances” despite having many adult children (note 2). In 1856 Rudnerweide had 33 farmsteads and 67 Anwohner or “cottager” families (note 3).

Heinrich was old enough to have experienced 5,000 wounded Russian soldiers from the Crimean War (1853-1856) cared for in the colonies; the expectation was that each farmstead was “to take one soldier and keep him until he was well again" (note 4). Some of the older teens would have made the long wagon trip to Crimea to deliver food supplies and to bring back the wounded.

His generation also experienced new religious impulses with the revivalist pietist preaching of Eduard Wüst from Germany but in Berdjansk (note 5). In the early and mid-1860s, his home village and church of Rudnerweide was rocked and split by the beginnings of the Mennonite Brethren movement (his sister Margaretha and husband Jacob Wiebe were among the earliest converts). Jacob Bekker of Rudnerweide warned the village chairman that “the sermons of our ministers were sending the entire church in to hell.” Bekker began to rebaptize people in the Juschanlee Creek adjacent to Rudnerweide in September 1860, claiming “that those who were baptized only once were baptized in the name of the devil” (note 6).

Response to the russification of the school system and to conscription were hotly debated in the early 1870s, and emigration to North America—perhaps of the entire Mennonite population—was considered at meetings held in Rudnerweide (note 7; his home village) where he taught at the time.

In the early 1870s, Bräul would have led Rudnerweide through the first large changes in the new curriculum negotiated by the Molotschna Mennonite School Board. Students were required to take 33.5 hours of weekly instruction over 7 years with the following subjects: 1) Bible and catechism, 6 hours; 2) German language, 10 hours; 3) arithmetic, 5 hours; 4) Russian language, 8 hours; 5) geography, 2 hours; 6) singing, 2.5 hours. Penmanship and drawing were practiced in the language courses, and natural sciences in connection with the German and Russian readers (note 8).

No later than 1873, Bräul was called to teach in Pordenau, just nine kilometres south-west of Rudnerweide, with some 48 farm households. Its original settlers were more conservative Flemish Mennonites in contrast to the Frisian progressives of Rudnerweide.

The Pordenau Church served the neighbouring villages of Schardau, Marienthal, Alexandertal, and Elisabethtal, with a larger meetinghouse constructed in 1860—just as the Mennonite Brethren secessionist movement broke out in this corner of the Molotschna.

The hiring elder in Pordenau was Isaak Peters, a well-read and prominent personality among his Molotschna colleagues, who had been a student in Bräul's father's schoolhouse in Rudnerweide.

Within a year of Heinrich Bräul’s arrival in Pordenau, this controversial elder was forced to resign and was expelled from Russia for promoting emigration (note 9). He left behind a divided community; painful community debate and sadness over friends and life-long neighbours emigrating marked community life.

Of the thirty-two families represented in Heinrich Bräul’s 1873–74 Pordenau school register, at least seven departed for Kansas, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Nebraska, the Dakotas and Manitoba (note 10).

James Urry estimates that 784 Molotschna families representing 4,500 people or twenty percent of the colony emigrated between 1873 and 1880 (note 11). In Pordenau, for example, the schoolhouse had thirteen fewer students in 1875–76 than two years earlier, a drop of twenty-one percent despite the arrival of new families—Koop, Nickel, and Schulz.

Heinrich married at age 36 in 1880; his wife Anna Matthies of Pordenau was fifteen years younger. She had likely been his student.

Broader curricular changes were required in the next years which further increased tensions. By 1887, all courses in the village schools except the Mennonite-specific German, Bible, and church music courses had to be taught in Russian (note 12); similar changes were made in the high school curriculum.

His eldest child Anna died in 1890 at age 9; four years later at the age of 51 he left teaching. With eight children, he and his wife moved from Rudnerweide and purchased a full farm in Marienthal, adjacent to his wife’s family village of Pordenau. Heinrich’s nephew Peter Wiebe was schoolmaster in Marienthal (note 13).

By the time of Heinrich's retirement from teaching, even those who had once opposed Russian language instruction in the schools had realized “that resistance was both futile and unwise,” for even village mayors “cannot do their work without some knowledge of Russian" (note 14).

And despite the fears of many, the larger state plan for the Russification of its foreign colonists in the 1870s did not result in the assimilation of Mennonites. Rather, Mennonites became truly bi-lingual and bi-cultural citizens of Russia—a balance guided and achieved not least by the community’s approximately 400 schoolhouse teachers across Russia (note 15)—like Heinrich Bräul.

Heinrich became a farmer in his early 50s. While he had not learnt farming from his parents, his wife’s large family had farmed successfully.

A 1899 district agricultural report noted that some teachers in the German villages—including Heinrich—had been given vines and equipment to help establish a local wine industry. They were instructed in all aspects of viniculture and were in turn expected to teach others in the village. In 1899 Heinrich Bräul’s wine had not been successful: "Marienthal, Heinrich Bräul: White wine, 4% alcohol, sour taste of yeast," as recorded in the report (note 16).

Shortly after the attached family picture was taken in 1899, Heinrich died, perhaps from stomach cancer. He was 57. No family was without its measure of sorrow; he and wife Anna had just lost a four-month-old child earlier that year. Now in December Anna was a widow with eight children and another child on the way. Notably more than a third of church funerals in this era were for children under the age one (note 17). After twenty months as a widow, Anna re-married her younger widowed brother-in-law Abram Neufeld, also a teacher and with two children born to her deceased sister. He died six short weeks after their wedding from a severe case of typhus fever at age 34. Once again, Anna was widowed and expecting another child. She gave up her two stepchildren /nephews to other relatives. The eldest boys were old enough to help her operate the family farmstead.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

--Notes—

Note 1: See previous posts (forthcoming).

Note 2: See Heinrich Goerz, in John B. Toews, “Cultural and Intellectual Aspects of the Mennonite Experience in Russia,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 53, no. 2 (1979), 146f.

Note 3: J. Martens, “Statistische Mittheilungen über die Mennoniten-Gemeinden im südlichen Rußland (1. Januar 1856),” Mennonitische Blätter 4, no. 3 (1857), 31, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1854-1900/1857/DSCF0082.JPG.

Note 4: H. B. Friesen, in Lawrence Klippenstein, “Mennonites and the Crimean War (1853–1856): Three Eyewitness Accounts,” Spirit-Wrestlers (Blog), 2012, p. 9, http://spirit-wrestlers.com/2012_Klippenstein_Mennonites-Crimean-War.pdf.

Note 5: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/eduard-wust-second-menno.html.

Note 6: In John B. Toews, ed., The Story of the Early Mennonite Brethren 1860–1869: Reflections of a Lutheran Churchman (Winnipeg, MB: Kindred, 2002), 27, https://archive.org/details/TheStoryOfTheEarlyMennoniteBrethrenOcrOpt/page/n35.

Note 7: Franz Isaac, Die Molotschnaer Mennoniten. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte derselben (Halbstadt, Taurien: H. J. Braun, 1908), 295f., https://mla.bethelks.edu/books/Molotschnaer Mennoniten/; ET: https://www.mharchives.ca/download/3573/.

Note 8: Cf. Peter Braun, “The Educational System of the Mennonite Colonies in South Russia,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 3, no. 3 (July 1929), 177.

Note 9: Cf. H. F. Epp, “Peters, Isaak (1826–1911),” GAMEO, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Peters,_Isaak_(1826-1911). See also P.M. Friesen, Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia, 1789–1910 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978) https://archive.org/details/TheMennoniteBrotherhoodInRussia17891910/. Isaac Peters, “An Account of the Cause and Purpose that led to the Emigration of the Mennonites from Russia to America,” Herald of Truth 44, no. 45–47 (November 7, 14, 21, 1907), 417–418; 427; 437–438.

Note 10: Cf. Arnold Schroeder, trans., “Molotschna School Registers, 1873–1874” (http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/school73.htm) and “Molotschna School Registers, 1875–1876” (http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/school75.htm), as well as the corresponding entries in the “Genealogical Registry and Database of Mennonite Ancestry” (GRanDMA). Bernhard Fast family to Kansas, 1874; Johann Fast family to Minnesota, 1875; Franz Janzen family to Nebraska, 1879; Isaak Loewen family to Manitoba, 1874; Franz Toews family to Minnesota 1857; Heinrich Unruh family to the Dakotas in 1874; Jacob Schulz family (see 1875–76 Register) to Kansas, 1879. Five further Pordenau families are listed in April 1874 as wishing to resettle in America. See Steve Fast, trans., “List of Molotschna Mennonites wishing to immigrate to America, 1874,” Russian State Historical Archive, St. Petersburg, Fond 1246, Opis, 1 Delo 8, 109–120. http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/Molotschna1874.html.

Note 11: James Urry, cited in Cited in Helmut Huebert, Hierschau: An Example of Russian Mennonite Life (Winnipeg, MB: Springfield, 1986) 89. https://archive.org/details/HierschauAnExampleOfRussianMennoniteLifeOCRopt/page/n113.

Note 12: P. Braun, “The Educational System of the Mennonite Colonies in South Russia,” 177f.

Note 13: Wiebe was awarded a medal for twenty-five years of teaching service in 1906 (Odessa Zeitung 156 [July 11/ 24, 1906], 3).

Note 14: Wilhelm Neufeld, “Unterrichtswesen unter den Mennoniten in Rußland,” in Jahrbuch der Altevangelischen Taufgesinnten oder Mennoniten-Gemeinden, edited by H. G. Mannhardt (Danzig, 1888), 136, https://books.google.ca/books?id=ok5FAQAAMAAJ&dq.

Note 15: Statistics are for 1914; cf. James Urry, “Prolegomena to the Study of Mennonite Society in Russia, 1880–1914,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 8 (1990), 58. https://jms.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/jms/article/view/658/658.

Note 16: Report of the Berdyansk Zemstvo District Council on Agriculture, 1899, 47, 48, https://zounb.zp.ua/sites/default/files/pdf/2017/otchet_berdjanskoj_zemskoj_upravy.pdf.

Note 17: Cf. statistics on deaths between 1865 to 1925 by Elder C. Nickel of Koppenthal-Ohrloff Mennonite Church, Unser Blatt I, no. 8 (May 1926), 186, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/Pis/UB25_08.pdf. Between 1914 and 1925, only 30.16% of the deaths in this church were children under one, compared to a high of 49.3% in this community’s early settlement years, 1865 to 1874.  

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "'Heinrich J. Bräul, Teacher, 1843-1899," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), June 10, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/06/heinrich-j-braul-teacher-1843-1899.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The End of Schardau (and other Molotschna villages), 1941

My grandmother was four-years old when her parents moved from Petershagen, Molotschna to Schardau in 1908. This story is larger than that of Schardau, but tells how this village and many others in Molotschna were evacuated by Stalin days before the arrival of German troops in 1941. -ANF The bridge across the Dnieper at Chortitza was destroyed by retreating Soviet troops on August 18, 1941 and the hydroelectric dam completed near Einlage in 1932 was also dynamited by NKVD personnel—killing at least 20,000 locals downstream, and forcing the Germans to cross further south at Nikopol. For the next six-and-a-half weeks, the old Mennonite settlement area of Chortitza was continuously shelled by Soviet troops from Zaporozhje on the east side of the river ( note 1 ). The majority of Russian Germans in Crimea and Ukraine paid dearly for Germany’s Blitzkrieg and plans for racially-based population resettlements. As early as August 3, 1941, the Supreme Command of the Soviet Forces received noti...

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...