Skip to main content

A Day in Her Shoes: Women on the Collective Farms, 1930s

What did a typical day look like for a Mennonite woman on a collective farm in Ukraine (note 1)?

She had to get up while it was still dark to milk the one cow the family was allotted—something Stalin specifically guaranteed kolkhoz “women” in 1933 (note 2)—together with one pig and a pair of chickens.

Then she would wake the children and quickly get them ready for school, prepare breakfast, bring the youngest children to kindergarten, and finally leave for the field.

Kindergarten was mandated as a form of childcare to mobilize more women for the workforce.

Women would arrive together with hoes over their shoulders, usually barefoot—though some had wooden shoes—each in a dress covered in patches. A collective farm might have five working groups of women, with about 20 to 25 women per group.

Many root crops were planted, and day after day, week after week, these women would hoe and weed the planted fields. Each woman was given a certain number of rows; whoever finished first could stay home one day to work their own garden.

Regularly the work apportioned far exceeded what they could reasonably complete, and so the fields were often thick with weeds. This made the work all the more difficult. Yet their need compelled them to meet quota, often without pausing, so as not to lose a portion of their meager pay.

A few years ago I interviewed Albert Dahl of Marienthal. Only seven or eight years of age at the time, Albert was responsible to bridle, harness, saddle and then hitch horse and wagon filled with infants from the nursery, and bring the babies into the fields for their mothers—each hoeing endless rows of potatoes—to take and nurse. He did this in tears; he knew he was much too young for what he was required to do (note 3).

There were many women—especially those forty and older—who were no longer strong or young enough to fully complete their work assignment and would simply break down. Eduard Allert (pseud.) recalls: “Before the revolution, our people had been using modern farm machinery and had done the threshing by engine power. All that was a thing of the past. We now had to return to the most primitive methods” (note 4).

In the kolkhoz crops were distributed according to a norm system, and all work was evaluated and timed. At the end of the year after government quotas were delivered, the remainder of the crop left for distribution was apportioned according to workday credits accumulated. If quotas were not met, there would not be sufficient food for the collective. No allowance was made for the children, the sick, or the old. All collectivists were poor in clothing and food, but families with many young children or with old parents were “desperately poor” (note 5).

“The small children received their meals in the kindergarten. For the working mothers of the collective a common kitchen was organized and the members ate their meals in a common dining hall. We, the public school children, also went to the dining hall where we had to wait until the adults had finished their meal and then we were given the leftovers. Those who could not work in the collective, the old or feeble, received no bread and no provisions. Working family members had to share their own meagre portions with them ... .” (Note 6)

Often there were not enough horses to transport the women to their fieldwork; many a day they would walk that distance and back again at noon, exhausted and burdened with sorrows to feed their children, the pig and the chickens.

Not to return to the field “could be seen as sabotage; everyone was simply frightened.” Many were routinely humiliated, publicly denounced as weaklings, laggards or liars. Towards evening the women returned to the village, “tired with thick heads, heavy hearts and empty stomachs” (note 7).

First, the youngest children were picked up from kindergarten, and then at home mothers had to milk, feed and water the cow, care for the pig and chickens again, and then prepare supper. After the children were in bed, the women typically baked bread for the next day, made butter from the cow’s milk, washed the day’s clothes, and mended (note 8). These women—especially after 1937 without men—were forced to hold all the needs of the family together.

John J. Neufeld described these scenes in a little memoir written for Der Bote in the 1990. Here he speaks of his former boss, Ivan P. Kovalenko, chairman of Elisabethtal, who would soon become the chairman of the sel-soviet agricultural unit of Alexanderthal, Elisabethtal, Schardau, Pordenau, and Marienthal.

Kovalenko “came to us in 1934 from the Russian village of Terpinnya, not far from Melitopol. He was a communist, just discharged from the Red Army ... As a rule, every evening a work plan for the following day was worked out, but this was never completed. … He was rarely to be found in the office, but was among the workers in the fields. ... He liked to talk to the women while they worked. It was usually a ladder wagon harnessed with four horses that took these women to their work and also home. Often on the way home he also got on the wagon; but when the women sang spiritual songs, he would silently get off and walk home. Once the group leader came to me and asked if Kovalenko had said anything about their singing. 'I never heard him say anything about it to anyone,' was my reply. ...

After the women had worked hard from 9 o'clock in the morning until 6 o'clock in the evening, they rode home singing. But they didn't do it for pleasure. They just didn't want to think about what was awaiting them at home. First, the children had to be picked up from the kindergarten; then they had to go to the end of the village to milk their cow... Then the milk had to be taken to the centrifuge, where a certain portion had to be handed over. Only then the housewife could go home. There she made supper for the family, washed the children and put them to bed. The women were not particularly forced to work, but all the food was distributed according to the number of days worked. There were many women whose husbands were in exile [most executed -ANF]. The care for the family was on their shoulders." (Note 9)

Kovalenko signed the arrest orders for many of the local men in 1937, including my grandfather’s (see pic, note 10).

For a few years, Helene Bräul—my grandmother—was assigned to work in the kindergarten, but this was not so easy. One woman who did laundry for the local kindergarten describes her assignment:

“It truly was hard work, for I had to walk two kilometres and carry heavy bundles of bedding and towels for forty people—children and workers. It required a lot of water which had to be carried from the well which was several building sites away. This water had to be heated so it required a lot of wood. I ordered loads of wood for a fee, but I had to saw and split it myself. Naturally all the laundry had to be scrubbed on the scrub board, wrung out by hand and hung out to dry ... I did this every two weeks, and it usually took four days to get it all done.” (Note 11)

The nearest store was in the village of Alexandertal, three-and-a-half kilometres west. Only seldom did the store have items for purchase, and when goods arrived, those in Marienthal were often not informed or not freed from work.

“People began to line up at 12 midnight because the need was so great. … The police would chase them away, but to no avail; by morning a large group was waiting again. When the store opened … typically there wasn’t enough for even half the people. Then the screaming and hitting would begin, and doors and windows would be pushed in. Those lucky enough to enter received five metres of fabric, while the others went home with nothing more than a heavy heart, and tired from standing so long.” (Note 12)

All institutions associated with the old Tsarist regime came under assault with Stalin’s First Five Year Plan, and this included the traditional family. The roles of these women shifted by 1930, e.g., from homemaker on a family farm to Soviet worker on a collective farm operation. Significantly, parents were increasingly removed from the lives of their children.

In Stalin’s own words to women collective farmers, “they must remember the power and significance of the collective farms for women … only in the collective farm do they have the opportunity of being on an equal footing with men. … Let our comrades, the women collective farmers, remember this and let them cherish the collective farm system as the apple of their eye” (note 13). 

Hans Rehan remembered his own mother Sara (my grandmother's sister) in similar roles: “She worked hard in the kolkhoz from early till late. … At night, tired, she asked us if we had prayed; ‘If not, then pray.’” While their influence on their own children diminished vis à vis "Father Stalin," many of these mothers were able to keep this thin thread of faith alive with their children (note 14).

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pic 1: “Planting potatoes by hand at the Khortitsa state farm,” April 1932, Dneprostroy District, USSR, no. 5439805, 16433/52b, State Central Museum of Contemporary History of Russia, https://goskatalog.ru/portal/?fbclid=IwAR2XwlS7T6rqdu8aGusbGV7RYcA6bUEmU_99qqZhN0IsVcng49KV3eQf2_k#/collections?id=5575195.

Pic 2: The scene is from a collective farm in Rosenthal in 1934, amalgamated with the village of Chortitza. Agricultural equipment was now a thing of the past, and these women were raking and hoeing root crops by hand. Copy in Gerhard Lohrenz, Damit es nicht vergessen werde. Bildband zur Geschichte der Mennoniten Preussens und Russlands (Winnipeg: CMBC, 2nd rev. Ed., 1977); also https://chort.square7.ch/FB/BF618.html.

Pic 3: From Mennonite Archival Image Database, https://archives.mhsc.ca/milking-crew-on-collective-farm-at-former-home-of-spenst-family-in-konteniusfeld-molotschna-1935.

Note 1: See Jacob A. Neufeld, Tiefenwege: Erfahrungen und Erlebnisse von Russland-Mennoniten in zwei Jahrzehnten bis 1949 (Virgil, ON: Niagara, 1958), 33–36; Eduard Allert (pseudonym for Eduard Reimer), “The Lost Generation,” in The Lost Generation and other Stories, edited by Gerhard Lohrenz, 9–128 (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1982), 32; Anna Buhler (Marienthal), in A. A. Toews, ed. Mennonitische Märtyrer der jüngsten Vergangenheit und der Gegenwart, vol. 2: Der große Leidensweg (North Clearbrook, BC: Self-published, 1954), 72–74.

Note 2: February 19, 1933, in Stalin, Works, vol. 13 (Moscow: Foreign Languages, 1954) 259. Cf. R. W. Davies, “Stalin as Economic Policy-Maker: Soviet Agriculture, 1931–1936,” in Stalin: A New History, edited by Sarah Davies and James R. Harris, 121–139 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Note 3: Albert Dahl, interview with the author, July 26, 2017, at Tabor Manor, St. Catharines, Ontario.

Note 4: Allert, “The Lost Generation,” 13f.

Note 5: Allert, “The Lost Generation,” 24.

Note 6: Allert, “The Lost Generation,” 18.

Note 7: J. Neufeld, Tiefenwege, 35, 39.

Note 8: Allert, “The Lost Generation,” 32.

Note 9: John J. Neufeld, “Erinnerungen und Erlebnisse aus den schweren Jahren 1936-1943 in Sowjetrußland,” 2. Fortsetzung,” Der Bote no. 20 (May 16, 1990), 9.

Note 10: “NKVD Case no. 314: Accusation of Bräul, Franz Heinrich,” from SAZR, NKVD Collection 5747, Inventory 3, File 4595. For a fuller examination of the arrests in these villages, see my published essay, “A new Examination of the ‘Great Terror’ in Molotschna, 1937–38,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 95, no. 4 (October 2021), 415–458. https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1031.

Note 11: Cited in Marlene Epp, Women without Men: Mennonite Refugees of the Second World War (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000), 23.

Note 12: Anna Buhler, in A. Toews, Mennonitische Märtyrer der jüngsten Vergangenheit II, 74.

Note 13: Johann Rehan, “Etwas aus der Vergangenheit” (1992/1995), 5. In author’s possession. For a less painful childhood perspective from Osterwick, Chortitza, cf. Victor Janzen, From the Dniepr to the Paraguay River (Winnipeg, MB: Self-published, 1995), 13–17.





Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C