Skip to main content

Earthen Huts (Semljanken): First—and for some last—Homes in Russia

The illustration below of the “earthen huts” constructed by the first “Black Sea” German settlers does not Mennonites, but likely neighbouring Molotschna German Lutherans, ca. 1804. I think poster by Willy Planck captures the earliest experiences of German settlers with some authenticity. It is entitled: “‘Difficult Beginnings! First field cultivation before house construction in the Black Sea region” (note 1).

I was first introduced to the earthen huts in the 1980s when I interviewed elderly siblings of my grandfather. When their parents left Molotschna in March 1891 for the new daughter colony “Neu Samara,” they first lived in earthen huts. They were made of clay, sod, logs and straw were built approximately one metre below and one metre above the ground. Their parents not only brought a few basic farming implements and enough money to purchase a cow from locals, but also a door and window that were incorporated into the structure. “Although the clay huts were far from ideal, the family could keep from freezing during the long six-month winter. The huts also provided an escape from the very hot and dry summers which central Russia experiences” (note 2).

Mennonites immigrating to the North American prairies in the 1870s did the same. Unlike American sod houses, the Mennonite or Volga German “Russian-German” sod dwelling or semljanka (alternately Semlin or Zemlianka) in Kansas “was set three feet in the ground. The walls were built of sod, projecting several feet above ground level. The interior walls were plastered with a combination of mud mixed with dried prairie grass. This mud-grass mixture was also pressed into molds and made into sun-dried bricks” (note 3).

The same style of huts were constructed on the Mennonite West Reserve in Manitoba. While wood was available to East Reserve settlers, many stubbornly insisted on the semljanka and suffered flooding in their homes with the spring thaw and rising ground water. As Mennonite recalled, “there was sufficient good timber to build good farm houses, but no!—They had to build like in Russia” (note 4).

The first year in the Molotschna Colony (1804) likely looked similar to the attached illustration. The 1848 Molotschna village histories give us these three snap shots. In the Mennonite village of Muntau: “For the first winter they set up earthen huts, and used the dwellings they had begun as cattle sheds.” In Lindenau: “Building was initially somewhat arduous; some had made earthen huts for the winter, and some who were better off or had more workers built a house for two and more families for the winter.” Altona: “The establishment of the village and the construction of houses was begun in 1804. However, because of the great distance from which the timber had to be retrieved, only 6 houses were completed that year. Most of the settlers stayed in earthen huts for the first winter” (note 5).

The 1804 correspondence between the newly appointed Governor General of New Russia, the Duke of Richelieu in Odesa and Samuel Contenius, Chief Judge of the Guardianship Commission for Foreign Settlers, in Ekaterinoslav (today Dnipro) shows the concern of the state for the new settlers on the Molotschna River. On October 14, 1804, Richelieu wrote:

“I am replying immediately to your letter of the 9th which I received this morning. I am greatly concerned about the Mennonites in Molotchnya, because of the extremely harsh season setting in and the state in which I know their houses to be in. If they have enough heating, they will survive the winter [well] in their Semmelche. Our people here have made small iron stoves that I recommend to you. They are 4 sheets of iron united, like a house of cards and well nailed, with a pipe also of iron. This gives a great heat and is heated with only a handful of 6ypsir [grass /reeds ?].” (Note 6)

In the same letter, Richelieu was much more concerned and frustrated with the nearby Lutheran and Catholic German settlers in their huts, who might not survive the winter.

“Diseases and deaths continue among the Germans. Because their houses [meant here are the earthen huts] are cold, they don't get out of bed, and as a result their condition becomes even worse. I have sent an order to Ekatarinoslav to buy sheep skins and I am having these iron stoves put into their huts, and when that is done I will stay there myself for a month. And if necessary I will make them work, clean, wash, I will have roll call, and I will establish a military regime with the help of two or three of my young men, and some low ranking officers. It is necessary to save them by force, otherwise they will perish. I believe that you will approve of my plan. If I have the misfortune to have to witness the loss of these people, at least I do not want to have to reproach myself later for having neglected to save them. … In the name of God, do not neglect the measures to be taken for the houses … The Bulgarians are doing well, while so many Germans are dying.” (Note 7)

Two years later a traveler to the region reported progress among the Mennonites, but not much among the Lutherans and Catholics.

“These Mennonites have not only brought many cows, horses and sheep from Prussia, but also oxen for breeding... It is a pity that there is a complete lack of wood here! Not even a single shrub grows along the Molotschna River. The most necessary timber they must bring from the Dniper River, which is 60 to 70 versts away [about 70 km or 43 miles]. … All of them said that they were very satisfied … After visiting the 18 Mennonite villages, we proceeded to the eight other villages beyond Prishib. The Germans who founded them … are a mix of Catholics, Reformed and Lutherans. ... When compared to the Mennonites … they are not only more lax, but also poorer, though they came into the country at the same time as the Mennonites. They were also far behind in building houses, which is why many still lived in earthen huts and had many sick people.” (Note 8)

Earthen huts are also a part of the Chortitza Mennonite settlement story in 1790. Promised government loans and supplies including timber for construction were slow to arrive with an exhausted state treasury. When logs did appear, they were of poor quality and were mostly sold for food. As a result, most settlers lived in earthen huts (Semljanken) in the first four years and many died of dysentery—normally caused by poverty and lack of good hygiene and clean water—“a pitiable report that I could not read without tears,” their one-time immigration agent Georg Trappe reported (note 9).

In the 1848 Chortitza Colony history, the then elderly teacher Heinrich Heese recalled that “earthen huts were their [first] homes … laborers and people in the service industry who came with extravagant expectations and the fixed idea of finding comfort and prosperity in Russia … had to be very discouraged” (note 10).

“The peaceful and industrious forefathers that set to work immediately lived in houses and enjoyed nutritious food from their own produce while the dissatisfied masses sat in their earthen huts sneering into their bowls of soup made of half-moldy storeroom flour. Ignorance led to discontentment, distrust, abuse and lethargy. The two deputies, Höppner and Bartsch, the most-able men of their time, eventually succumbed to this misery … The dissatisfaction … together with an unusually high rate of death, and lack of food and clothing, heightened the misery to such a degree which, like emaciation, could only be healed over many years, whereby some thirty died.” (Note 11)

More recently, my aunt Adina (by marriage) told me of how her father and his two brothers in Sparrau, Molotschna, were arrested in the 1930s (we now know they were eventually shot together in 1937). Her uncle Kornelius K. Neufeld had been an estate owner before the revolution, and with dekulakization and collectivization in early 1930s, he was dispossessed and “driven four kilometers out onto the steppe, where he lived for three years in an earthen hut dug into the ground,” according to one of the grandchildren. They were  “banned from entering the village and grandmother went mad (durcheinander)” (note 12). A similar story is reported in the Chortitiza district villages of Franzfeld (note 13).


And as a final example, many Mennonite deportees from Molotschna to Kazakhstan in Fall 1941 were forced to spend all of 1942 in earthen huts (note 14).

These “earthen hut” (semljanka) references together with this illustration helpfully allow us to enter into and tell significant chapters of the larger, longer Russian Mennonite story in Ukraine—from its difficult beginnings until its difficult end.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1/ picture: The attached picture is a corner of the full painting: “Deutsches Volkstum in aller Welt. Der harte Anfang!” Erste Feldbestellung vor dem Hausbau im Schwarzmeer-Gebiet. Nach einem Original von Willy Planck in Der praktische Schulmann, no. 273 (Stuttgart: Keller & Nehmann, 1940), https://www.vintage13.de/schulwandkarte-lehrtafel-deutsches-volkstum-in-aller-welt-schulmann-nr-273_183294_55394; https://www.abebooks.com/Deutsches-Volkstum-aller-Welt-harte-Anfang/14312042232/bd#&gid=1&pid=1. Accompanying text in Schulmann, Heft 7 (1940).

The artist Willy Planck (1870-1956) illustrated many books including children’s books over decades (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willy_Planck). Notably this poster was created in the Nazi era (1940, WWII) and from an associated publication, and some care should be used in its interpretation. The depiction supports the Nazi-era myth of an inner drive and competency of “German blood” with many (blond) children, and the expansive needs for German living space: “Blut und Boden”.

Note 2: See my unpublished undergraduate "Mennonite History" paper written almost four decades ago at Canadian Mennonite University: “A History of the Fast Family,” Winnipeg, 1984, 15, 17, https://neu.chortitza.org/2022/03/a-history-of-the-fast-family/.

Note 3: See Albert J. Petersen, “The German-Russian House in Kansas: A Study in Persistence of Form,” Pioneer America 8, no. 1 (January 1976), 19.

Note 4: P. W. Toews, “Aus meinem Leben,” Steinbach Post, Sept. 20, 27, Oct. 4, 1944, cited in E. K. Francis, “Bibliographical and Research Notes: The Mennonite Farmhouse in Manitoba,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 28, no. 1 (1954), 56-59; 56.

Note 5: In Margarete Woltner, ed., Die Gemeindeberichte von 1848 der deutschen Siedlungen am Schwarzen Meer (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1941); Muntau, 94; Lindenau, 99; Altona, 113, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/kb/woltner.pdf.

Note 6: Duke of Richelieu to Samuel Contenius, October 14, 1804, in Lettres d’Odessa du duc de Richelieu, 1803–1814, edited by Elena Polevchtchikova and Dominique Triaire (Ferney-Voltaire: Center international du xviii e siècle, 2014), 93. See also earlier post on Richelieu: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/duke-of-richelieu-and-molotschna.html.

Note 7: Richelieu to Contenius, October 14, 1804, Lettres, 94.

Note 8: “Reise eines Kaufmannes aus dem Astrachanischen nach Taganrok, Odessa und den neugegründeten Kolonien an der Moloschna im Jahre 1806 (nebst einer Karte),” Journal für die neuesten Land- and Seereisen und das Interessanteste aus der Völker- und Länderkunde zur angenehmen Unterhaltung für gebildete Leser in allen Ständen, vol. 7 (Berlin: Friedrich Braunes, 1810), https://onb.digital/result/1034607D. Translation of pp. 23–28.

Note 9: Cited by Grigorii G. Pisarevskii, Izbrannye proizvedenija po istorii inostrannoj kolonizacii v Rossii [Selected works on the history of foreign colonization in Russia], edited by I. V. Cherkazyanova (Moscow: ICSU, 2011), 201, https://bibliothek.rusdeutsch.ru/catalog/860. See English selections: https://www.mharchives.ca/download/3422/. Cf. also George K. Epp, Geschichte der Mennoniten, vol. 1 (Lage: Logos, 1997), 93.

Note 10: Heinrich Heese, “Das Chortitzer Mennonitengebiet 1848. Kurzgefasste geschichtliche Übersicht der Gründung und des Bestehens der Kolonien des Chortitzer Mennonitenbezirkes,” https://chortitza.org/Ber1848.html#Eg ; also in Woltner, Gemeindeberichte.

Note 11: Heese, “Chortitzer Mennonitengebiet 1848.”
Note 12: Cf. “Sparrau,” in Peter Letkemann, “Molotschna Village Notes;” working copy in author’s possession.
Note 13: “Schulisches Leben: Bericht vom Lehrer K. Epp,” in “Franzfeld Dorfbericht,” 6-7 (388b-389; or slides 19f. of 54), from “Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp,” prepared for the German Reichsminister for the Occupied Eastern Territories, Bundesarchiv (BA) R6/621, Mappe 84, April 1942, https://tsdea.archives.gov.ua/deutsch/gallery.php?tt=R_6_622+Gebiet%3A+Zwischen%0D%0ARayon%3A+Chortizza%0D%0AKreisgebiet%3A+Saporoshje%0D%0AGenerelbezirk%3A+Dnjepropertrowsk+Dorf%3A+Franzfeld%0D%0Arussisch+%E2%80%93+Warwarovka+&p=R_6_622%5C%D1%823_779-841%0D%0A#lg=1&slide=0. 

Note 14: In Alfred Eisfeld and Victor Herdt, Deportation, Sondersiedlung, Arbeitsarmee: Deutsche in der Sowjetunion 1941 bis 1956 (Köln: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik, 1996), 247, doc.197 (Mamljutskij Rayon to the Kazakh People’s Commissariat of the Interior Executive, January 23, 1943).

--

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Earthen Huts (Semljanken): First—and for some last—Homes in Russia," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), August 30, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/08/earthen-huts-semljanken-firstand-for.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Invitation to the Russian Consulate, Danzig, January 19, 1788

B elow is one of the most important original Mennonite artifacts I have seen. It concerns January 19. The two land scouts Jacob Höppner and Johann Bartsch had returned to Danzig from Russia on November 10, 1787 with the Russian Immigration Agent, Georg von Trappe. Soon thereafter, Trappe had copies of the royal decree and agreement (Gnadenbrief) printed for distribution in the Flemish and Frisian Mennonite congregations in Danzig and other locations, dated December 29, 1787 ( see pic ; note 1 ). After the flyer was handed out to congregants in Danzig after worship on January 13, 1788, city councilors made the most bitter accusations against church elders for allowing Trappe and the Russian Consulate to do this; something similar had happened before ( note 2 ). In the flyer Trappe boasted that land scouts Höppner and Bartsch met not only with Gregory Potemkin, Catherine the Great’s vice-regent and administrator of New Russia, but also with “the Most Gracious Russian Monarch” herse...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (Holodomor), 1932-1933

In 2008 the Canadian Parliament passed an act declaring the fourth Saturday in November as “Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (‘Holodomor’) Memorial Day” ( note 1 ). Southern Ukraine was arguably the worst affected region of the famine of 1932–33, where 30,000 to 40,000 Mennonites lived ( note 2 ). The number of famine-related deaths in Ukraine during this period are conservatively estimated at 3.5 million ( note 3 ). In the early 1930s Stalin feared growing “Ukrainian nationalism” and the possibility of “losing Ukraine” ( note 4 ). He was also suspicious of ethnic Poles and Germans—like Mennonites—in Ukraine, convinced of the “existence of an organized counter-revolutionary insurgent underground” in support of Ukrainian national independence ( note 5 ). Ukraine was targeted with a “lengthy schooling” designed to ruthlessly break the threat of Ukrainian nationalism and resistance, and this included Ukraine’s Mennonites (viewed simply as “Germans”). Various causes combined to bring on w...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...
Post a Comment
Read more

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Four-Part Singing in Mennonite Schools and Church in Russia

The significance of singing instruction may seem trite, but it became a key vehicle in the Mennonite school curriculum for fostering a basic appreciation of the arts and for faith formation. In Johann Cornies’ circulated guidelines for teachers, singing was recommended as a means “to stimulate and enliven pious feelings” in the children—a guideline he copied directly from a German Catholic pedagogue and circulated freely under his own name ( note 1 ).  On January 26, 1846 Cornies distributed a curriculum regulation to all schools that mandated “singing by numbers ( Zahlen ) from the church hymnal” ( note 2 ). Attention to singing instruction in the schools precipitated significant and controversial changes in Mennonite liturgy. An 1854 visiting observer to the Bergthal Colony—a Chortitza daughter colony outside of Cornies’ purview—wrote: “Endlessly long hymns from the Gesangbuch (hymnal) were begun by the Vorsänger (song leader) of the congregation, and sung with so many flo...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Between Monarchs" a lot can happen (like revolt). A Mennonite "Accession" Prayer for the Monarch

It is surprising for many to learn that Russian Mennonites sang the Russian national anthem "God save the Tsar" in special worship services ... frequently! We have a "Mennonite prayer" and sermon sample for the accession of the monarch ( Thronbesteigung ) or its anniversary, with closing prayer-- and another Mennonite sampler of a coronation ( Krönung ) prayer, sermon and closing prayer ( note 1 ). After 70 years with one monarch, the manual is made for a time like this--try sharing it with your Canadian Mennonite pastor ;) Technically there is no “between” monarchs: “The Queen is Dead. Long live the King!” But there is much that happens or can happen before the coronation of the new monarch. Including revolt. Mennonites in Molotschna had hosted Tsar Alexander I shortly before his death in 1825. Upon his death in December, Alexander's brother and heir Constantine declined succession, and prior to the coronation of the next brother Nicholas, some 3,000 rebel (mos...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eduard Wüst: A “Second Menno”?

Arguably the most significant outside religious influence on Mennonite s in the 19th century was the revivalist preaching of Eduard Wüst, a university-trained Württemberg Pietist minister installed by the separatist Evangelical Brethren Church in New Russia in 1843 ( note 1 ). With the end-time prophesies of a previous generation of Pietists (and many Mennonites) coming to naught, Wüst introduced Germans in this area of New Russia to the “New Pietism” and its more individualistic, emotional conversion experience and sermons on the free grace of God centred on the cross of Christ ( note 2 ). Wüst’s 1851 Christmas sermon series give a good picture of what was changing ( note 3 ). His core agenda was to dispel gloom (which maybe could describe more traditional Mennonites) and induce Christian joy. This is the root impulse of the Mennonite Brethren beginnings years later in 1860. “Satan is not entitled to present his own as the most joyful.” His people “sing, jump, leap ( hüpfen ) ...
Post a Comment
Read more