Anti-Jewish Pogroms and Mennonite responses in Einlage (1905) and Sagradovka (1899)

Below are stories of two pogroms and of the responses in two Mennonite communities in Ukraine/Russia.

The first location is Einlage (Chortitza) in 1905, with two episodes.

The rage of peasants and the working class exploded with strikes, bloody revolts, chaos and plundering across the land, especially on the estates early in 1905. The Greater Zaporozhzhia-Alexandrovsk economic zone, with larger Mennonite manufacturers of agricultural machinery in Einlage as well, was a centre for some of that labour unrest (note 1).

In the shadows of the larger March 1905 Russian Revolution, there were so-called provocateurs named the "Black Hundred" (note 2) who organized pogroms across Russia, but especially in ethnic Ukrainian and Polish areas.

“Jewish stores, shops, and homes were broken into, robbed, and plundered; Jewish women and girls were raped and brutally murdered. Many Jews lost not only their belongings in Russia, but also their lives. And all with impunity. The police could not be relied upon, most of them were members of the "Black Hundred," and took part in the looting. Others stood by and watched.” (Note 3)

This spilled over into the predominantly Mennonite village of Einlage, where there were about 30 to 40 Jewish families in 1905, according to contemporary villager Heinrich Bergen. The Black Hundred extremists “directed the discontent of the less educated workers and villagers against the Jews”—many hoping simply to enrich themselves in the process (note 4).

“In several villages where there were factories, steam mills—such as Chortitza an Osterwick—there are several cases where the ‘Black Hundred’ with the help of the rabble from the Russian villages, tried to harass the Jews, but immediately the ethnic Germans intervened and doused the pogroms before they spread.” (Note 5)

But Bergen noted that the many Jewish families in the Mennonite villages were not harmed; “they were under the protection of the Germans,” i.e., the Mennonites.

Bergen tells of two incidents in Einlage.

"On the farm of Abram Dyck near the Martens-mill stood a wooden shop where the Jew Reichenstein had his store. In 1905 Abram Dyck was still a very strong man and was on the yard when two pogrom-instigators approached the door of the store to break it open. On his own, Abram Dyck approached them and beat them thoroughly, claiming that the store belonged to him, a German and not to the Jew Reichenstein. The pogrom instigators chose not to wait around until Abram Dyck's sons could step in, and retreated.” (Note 6)

The second case in Einlage was with the Jewish cobbler Sljudikow.

“For some 30 years he lived on the farm of Johann Joh. Reimer, where Sljudikow’s twelve sons and one daughter were born … Two of his sons were factory workers, the eldest of them Roman, was an active revolutionary; Abram, Volodya, and Naum were hairdressers in Einlage. Abram was injured in his foot during the war.

The Sljudikows were quiet, peaceful people who never hurt anyone in Einlage. However, old Slyudikov was very strong, and when I was seven years old in 1905 I watched how with a "ped" (used for carrying water) Sljudikow thoroughly thrashed a bandit who wanted to loot him during the Jewish pogrom. He beat the bandit so badly that he most likely lost the habit of looting for a long time. Slyudikov could get away with this, because he knew that the Einlagers [mostly Mennonite] would have his back.” (Note 7)

The two episodes complement each other and tell us something of the relationship between Jews and Mennonites in Einlage. The relationships were by no means perfect, but in crisis this Jewish man knew his Mennonite neighbours would support and protect him.

In a second location—six years earlier in 1899—another pogrom happened not far from the Mennonite colony of Sagradovka.

“There was some commotion among the Russian peasantry. Agrarian issues were causing distress, and an old grievance was looking for an outlet. Suddenly, in the large Jewish village of Nagartav (=Bereznegovatoje), a pogrom against the Jews arose. The Russian police often showed up a little too late for such cases, or perhaps they just did not want to see or help. For Jews in particular they did not have much mercy. The slogan of the blind masses was: "Beat the Jews and save Russia!” People took out their anger on the poor Jews. Terribly the whole [Jewish] village was completely destroyed.

Other Jewish villages were then also threatened and told that they would be next. Nagartav was 25 versts away from Sagradovka. Closer to the Mennonites, at a distance of 10 versts at most, were the two Jewish villages of Gross-Romanovka and Klein-Romanovka. The news of the pogrom in Nagartav had not yet reached our villages, when one Saturday morning the three villages of Alexanderfeld, Neu Schönsee and Friedensfeld were struck by a terrifying arrival. Like an avalanche, the inhabitants of Romanovka suddenly poured into these Mennonite villages in a great flight. Their wagons were loaded to the hilt with old men, women and children, as well as beds and various things.

None of us Germans suspected what was going on.

The women screamed, children cried, and shouts rang out: "Help! Save! Have mercy! Pogrom!" It was a panic parallel. But instincts of mercy and compassion knew what to do. In a few minutes the streets were empty: yards and houses and barns had opened their doors, and soon the frightened fugitives were under cover together with their wagons.

“Ask the Lord that your flight may not take place on the Sabbath day” [Matthew 24:20]. But it was Sabbath. In great anxiety they waited for the awful things that might come, but nothing happened. Outwardly everything remained silent. Only reconnaissance teams went through the streets from time to time and brought back reports to the mayoral offices. The day of terror slowly came to an end as nightfall arrived.

It was said that an order had been received that the Orloffer District Office should send out a guard of 500 men to Romanovka; however, the Oberschulze [Mennonite district mayor] refused, citing the Mennonite doctrine of non-resistance. Judgments and opinions differed.

By this point the Jews had heard that nothing disturbing had occurred in Romanovka thus far; it was still quiet. The next day—on Sunday—news came that the governor had arrived from Kherson with a detachment of Cossacks ... And the poor, frightened refugees returned to their abandoned homes that same day, comforted and rejoicing. This time they had escaped the worse with only a fright." (Note 8)

The Jewish community in this context knew that if its people had to flee for safety, then flee to the Mennonites.

Was this the norm or the exception? Here is another example from the Mennonitische Rundschau in 1882, suggesting that this was somewhat "natural" for Mennonites to do when pogroms arose, and that it came with a cost.

“Until now it appeared that in Russia Jews could find protection with German colonists from the raw persecution of Russians. This came naturally to us [Mennonites], for in our view it is not impossible that hatred could be stirred up against Germans as well. … 'Do unto others what you would have them do to you.' But now it is clear that this type of sympathy with Jews incites the hatred of the country’s population against Germans as well.” (Note 9)

To say that the relationship between Mennonites and Jews was "close" in Russia/Ukraine would be an exaggeration. And sadly there are other, less complimentary stories where—because of context—Mennonites were less able to be themselves. But these stories above and the instincts of the Mennonite community on behalf of their Jewish neighbours were not isolated or one-off. There are more such stories and they ring true to me—whether in urban contexts like Einlage or in the rural context of Sagradovka.

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pics: Hermann Roskoschny, Rußland Land und Leute (Leipzig: Greßner und Schramm, 1883), vol. 1, https://archive.org/details/russland-land-und-leute-bd-1-1883/page/n7/mode/2up. Pics 2 and 3: https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/what-were-pogroms/, and https://eesiag.com/history/jewish-pogroms-in-the-south-of-ukraine-in-the-first-russian-revolution.html.

Note 1: See previous posts (forthcoming)

Note 2: On the “Black Hundred,” cf. http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CB%5CL%5CBlackHundreds.htm.

Note 3: Heinrich Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943: Ein Denkmal (Regina, SK: Self-published, 2008), 103; 93. See also idem, Einlage: Chronik des Dorfes Kitschkas, 1789–1943 (Saskatoon, SK: Self-published, 2010).

Note 4: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 103.

Note 5: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 103.

Note 6: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 103.

Note 7: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 93.

Note 8: Franz W. Martens, “Johann Köhn, Schulrat und Oberschulze: Biographisch-geschichtliche Mitteilungen aus der Nikolaifelder Mennonitengemeinde auf Sagradowka für das Mennonitische Archiv in Canada,” Mennonitische Rundschau 61, no. 25 (June 22, 1938), 9, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1938-06-22_61_25/page/8/.

Note 9: Mennonitische Rundschau 3, no. 6 (March 15, 1882), 3, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1882-03-15_3_6/page/n1/mode/2up. The unnamed Mennonite correspondent continues the column with his own hateful language against these “lost sheep from the House of Israel”—which underlines again that the relationship was "complex."

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Anti-Jewish Pogroms and Mennonite responses in Einlage (1905) and Sagradovka (1899)," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), June 9, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/06/anti-jewish-pogroms-and-mennonite.html.

Comments

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons: Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog