Skip to main content

Anti-Jewish Pogroms and Mennonite responses in Einlage (1905) and Sagradovka (1899)

Below are stories of two pogroms and of the responses in two Mennonite communities in Ukraine/Russia.

The first location is Einlage (Chortitza) in 1905, with two episodes.

The rage of peasants and the working class exploded with strikes, bloody revolts, chaos and plundering across the land, especially on the estates early in 1905. The Greater Zaporozhzhia-Alexandrovsk economic zone, with larger Mennonite manufacturers of agricultural machinery in Einlage as well, was a centre for some of that labour unrest (note 1).

In the shadows of the larger March 1905 Russian Revolution, there were so-called provocateurs named the "Black Hundred" (note 2) who organized pogroms across Russia, but especially in ethnic Ukrainian and Polish areas.

“Jewish stores, shops, and homes were broken into, robbed, and plundered; Jewish women and girls were raped and brutally murdered. Many Jews lost not only their belongings in Russia, but also their lives. And all with impunity. The police could not be relied upon, most of them were members of the "Black Hundred," and took part in the looting. Others stood by and watched.” (Note 3)

This spilled over into the predominantly Mennonite village of Einlage, where there were about 30 to 40 Jewish families in 1905, according to contemporary villager Heinrich Bergen. The Black Hundred extremists “directed the discontent of the less educated workers and villagers against the Jews”—many hoping simply to enrich themselves in the process (note 4).

“In several villages where there were factories, steam mills—such as Chortitza an Osterwick—there are several cases where the ‘Black Hundred’ with the help of the rabble from the Russian villages, tried to harass the Jews, but immediately the ethnic Germans intervened and doused the pogroms before they spread.” (Note 5)

But Bergen noted that the many Jewish families in the Mennonite villages were not harmed; “they were under the protection of the Germans,” i.e., the Mennonites.

Bergen tells of two incidents in Einlage.

"On the farm of Abram Dyck near the Martens-mill stood a wooden shop where the Jew Reichenstein had his store. In 1905 Abram Dyck was still a very strong man and was on the yard when two pogrom-instigators approached the door of the store to break it open. On his own, Abram Dyck approached them and beat them thoroughly, claiming that the store belonged to him, a German and not to the Jew Reichenstein. The pogrom instigators chose not to wait around until Abram Dyck's sons could step in, and retreated.” (Note 6)

The second case in Einlage was with the Jewish cobbler Sljudikow.

“For some 30 years he lived on the farm of Johann Joh. Reimer, where Sljudikow’s twelve sons and one daughter were born … Two of his sons were factory workers, the eldest of them Roman, was an active revolutionary; Abram, Volodya, and Naum were hairdressers in Einlage. Abram was injured in his foot during the war.

The Sljudikows were quiet, peaceful people who never hurt anyone in Einlage. However, old Slyudikov was very strong, and when I was seven years old in 1905 I watched how with a "ped" (used for carrying water) Sljudikow thoroughly thrashed a bandit who wanted to loot him during the Jewish pogrom. He beat the bandit so badly that he most likely lost the habit of looting for a long time. Slyudikov could get away with this, because he knew that the Einlagers [mostly Mennonite] would have his back.” (Note 7)

The two episodes complement each other and tell us something of the relationship between Jews and Mennonites in Einlage. The relationships were by no means perfect, but in crisis this Jewish man knew his Mennonite neighbours would support and protect him.

In a second location—six years earlier in 1899—another pogrom happened not far from the Mennonite colony of Sagradovka.

“There was some commotion among the Russian peasantry. Agrarian issues were causing distress, and an old grievance was looking for an outlet. Suddenly, in the large Jewish village of Nagartav (=Bereznegovatoje), a pogrom against the Jews arose. The Russian police often showed up a little too late for such cases, or perhaps they just did not want to see or help. For Jews in particular they did not have much mercy. The slogan of the blind masses was: "Beat the Jews and save Russia!” People took out their anger on the poor Jews. Terribly the whole [Jewish] village was completely destroyed.

Other Jewish villages were then also threatened and told that they would be next. Nagartav was 25 versts away from Sagradovka. Closer to the Mennonites, at a distance of 10 versts at most, were the two Jewish villages of Gross-Romanovka and Klein-Romanovka. The news of the pogrom in Nagartav had not yet reached our villages, when one Saturday morning the three villages of Alexanderfeld, Neu Schönsee and Friedensfeld were struck by a terrifying arrival. Like an avalanche, the inhabitants of Romanovka suddenly poured into these Mennonite villages in a great flight. Their wagons were loaded to the hilt with old men, women and children, as well as beds and various things.

None of us Germans suspected what was going on.

The women screamed, children cried, and shouts rang out: "Help! Save! Have mercy! Pogrom!" It was a panic parallel. But instincts of mercy and compassion knew what to do. In a few minutes the streets were empty: yards and houses and barns had opened their doors, and soon the frightened fugitives were under cover together with their wagons.

“Ask the Lord that your flight may not take place on the Sabbath day” [Matthew 24:20]. But it was Sabbath. In great anxiety they waited for the awful things that might come, but nothing happened. Outwardly everything remained silent. Only reconnaissance teams went through the streets from time to time and brought back reports to the mayoral offices. The day of terror slowly came to an end as nightfall arrived.

It was said that an order had been received that the Orloffer District Office should send out a guard of 500 men to Romanovka; however, the Oberschulze [Mennonite district mayor] refused, citing the Mennonite doctrine of non-resistance. Judgments and opinions differed.

By this point the Jews had heard that nothing disturbing had occurred in Romanovka thus far; it was still quiet. The next day—on Sunday—news came that the governor had arrived from Kherson with a detachment of Cossacks ... And the poor, frightened refugees returned to their abandoned homes that same day, comforted and rejoicing. This time they had escaped the worse with only a fright." (Note 8)

The Jewish community in this context knew that if its people had to flee for safety, then flee to the Mennonites.

Was this the norm or the exception? Here is another example from the Mennonitische Rundschau in 1882, suggesting that this was somewhat "natural" for Mennonites to do when pogroms arose, and that it came with a cost.

“Until now it appeared that in Russia Jews could find protection with German colonists from the raw persecution of Russians. This came naturally to us [Mennonites], for in our view it is not impossible that hatred could be stirred up against Germans as well. … 'Do unto others what you would have them do to you.' But now it is clear that this type of sympathy with Jews incites the hatred of the country’s population against Germans as well.” (Note 9)

To say that the relationship between Mennonites and Jews was "close" in Russia/Ukraine would be an exaggeration. And sadly there are other, less complimentary stories where—because of context—Mennonites were less able to be themselves. But these stories above and the instincts of the Mennonite community on behalf of their Jewish neighbours were not isolated or one-off. There are more such stories and they ring true to me—whether in urban contexts like Einlage or in the rural context of Sagradovka.


            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pics: Hermann Roskoschny, Rußland Land und Leute (Leipzig: Greßner und Schramm, 1883), vol. 1, https://archive.org/details/russland-land-und-leute-bd-1-1883/page/n7/mode/2up. Pics 2 and 3: https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/what-were-pogroms/, and https://eesiag.com/history/jewish-pogroms-in-the-south-of-ukraine-in-the-first-russian-revolution.html.

Note 1: See previous posts (forthcoming)

Note 2: On the “Black Hundred,” cf. http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CB%5CL%5CBlackHundreds.htm.

Note 3: Heinrich Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943: Ein Denkmal (Regina, SK: Self-published, 2008), 103; 93. See also idem, Einlage: Chronik des Dorfes Kitschkas, 1789–1943 (Saskatoon, SK: Self-published, 2010).

Note 4: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 103.

Note 5: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 103.

Note 6: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 103.

Note 7: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 93.

Note 8: Franz W. Martens, “Johann Köhn, Schulrat und Oberschulze: Biographisch-geschichtliche Mitteilungen aus der Nikolaifelder Mennonitengemeinde auf Sagradowka für das Mennonitische Archiv in Canada,” Mennonitische Rundschau 61, no. 25 (June 22, 1938), 9, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1938-06-22_61_25/page/8/.

Note 9: Mennonitische Rundschau 3, no. 6 (March 15, 1882), 3, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1882-03-15_3_6/page/n1/mode/2up. The unnamed Mennonite correspondent continues the column with his own hateful language against these “lost sheep from the House of Israel”—which underlines again that the relationship was "complex."

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Anti-Jewish Pogroms and Mennonite responses in Einlage (1905) and Sagradovka (1899)," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), June 9, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/06/anti-jewish-pogroms-and-mennonite.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The End of Schardau (and other Molotschna villages), 1941

My grandmother was four-years old when her parents moved from Petershagen, Molotschna to Schardau in 1908. This story is larger than that of Schardau, but tells how this village and many others in Molotschna were evacuated by Stalin days before the arrival of German troops in 1941. -ANF The bridge across the Dnieper at Chortitza was destroyed by retreating Soviet troops on August 18, 1941 and the hydroelectric dam completed near Einlage in 1932 was also dynamited by NKVD personnel—killing at least 20,000 locals downstream, and forcing the Germans to cross further south at Nikopol. For the next six-and-a-half weeks, the old Mennonite settlement area of Chortitza was continuously shelled by Soviet troops from Zaporozhje on the east side of the river ( note 1 ). The majority of Russian Germans in Crimea and Ukraine paid dearly for Germany’s Blitzkrieg and plans for racially-based population resettlements. As early as August 3, 1941, the Supreme Command of the Soviet Forces received noti...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 2 of 4 to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF In a few short months the American government will start to fulfill its campaign promises to round up and deport undocumented immigrants. The responsible cabinet members have already been appointed. By early Spring 2025, Mennonite pastors/leaders who supported Trump will need to speak to and address the matter in their congregations. It will be difficult to find words. How might they prepare? Sometimes a template from the past is helpful. To that end, I offer my summary of a text by retired Mennonite pastor and conference leader Gustav Kraemer. (There is a nice entry on him in the Mennonite Encyclopedia,  GAMEO ). My summary is faithful to the German original, 1938. With only a few minor changes, it could be useful for the coming year. Adaptations are mostly in square brackets, with the key at the bottom of the post. ...
Post a Comment
Read more