Skip to main content

Anti-Jewish Pogroms and Mennonite responses in Einlage (1905) and Sagradovka (1899)

Below are stories of two pogroms and of the responses in two Mennonite communities in Ukraine/Russia.

The first location is Einlage (Chortitza) in 1905, with two episodes.

The rage of peasants and the working class exploded with strikes, bloody revolts, chaos and plundering across the land, especially on the estates early in 1905. The Greater Zaporozhzhia-Alexandrovsk economic zone, with larger Mennonite manufacturers of agricultural machinery in Einlage as well, was a centre for some of that labour unrest (note 1).

In the shadows of the larger March 1905 Russian Revolution, there were so-called provocateurs named the "Black Hundred" (note 2) who organized pogroms across Russia, but especially in ethnic Ukrainian and Polish areas.

“Jewish stores, shops, and homes were broken into, robbed, and plundered; Jewish women and girls were raped and brutally murdered. Many Jews lost not only their belongings in Russia, but also their lives. And all with impunity. The police could not be relied upon, most of them were members of the "Black Hundred," and took part in the looting. Others stood by and watched.” (Note 3)

This spilled over into the predominantly Mennonite village of Einlage, where there were about 30 to 40 Jewish families in 1905, according to contemporary villager Heinrich Bergen. The Black Hundred extremists “directed the discontent of the less educated workers and villagers against the Jews”—many hoping simply to enrich themselves in the process (note 4).

“In several villages where there were factories, steam mills—such as Chortitza an Osterwick—there are several cases where the ‘Black Hundred’ with the help of the rabble from the Russian villages, tried to harass the Jews, but immediately the ethnic Germans intervened and doused the pogroms before they spread.” (Note 5)

But Bergen noted that the many Jewish families in the Mennonite villages were not harmed; “they were under the protection of the Germans,” i.e., the Mennonites.

Bergen tells of two incidents in Einlage.

"On the farm of Abram Dyck near the Martens-mill stood a wooden shop where the Jew Reichenstein had his store. In 1905 Abram Dyck was still a very strong man and was on the yard when two pogrom-instigators approached the door of the store to break it open. On his own, Abram Dyck approached them and beat them thoroughly, claiming that the store belonged to him, a German and not to the Jew Reichenstein. The pogrom instigators chose not to wait around until Abram Dyck's sons could step in, and retreated.” (Note 6)

The second case in Einlage was with the Jewish cobbler Sljudikow.

“For some 30 years he lived on the farm of Johann Joh. Reimer, where Sljudikow’s twelve sons and one daughter were born … Two of his sons were factory workers, the eldest of them Roman, was an active revolutionary; Abram, Volodya, and Naum were hairdressers in Einlage. Abram was injured in his foot during the war.

The Sljudikows were quiet, peaceful people who never hurt anyone in Einlage. However, old Slyudikov was very strong, and when I was seven years old in 1905 I watched how with a "ped" (used for carrying water) Sljudikow thoroughly thrashed a bandit who wanted to loot him during the Jewish pogrom. He beat the bandit so badly that he most likely lost the habit of looting for a long time. Slyudikov could get away with this, because he knew that the Einlagers [mostly Mennonite] would have his back.” (Note 7)

The two episodes complement each other and tell us something of the relationship between Jews and Mennonites in Einlage. The relationships were by no means perfect, but in crisis this Jewish man knew his Mennonite neighbours would support and protect him.

In a second location—six years earlier in 1899—another pogrom happened not far from the Mennonite colony of Sagradovka.

“There was some commotion among the Russian peasantry. Agrarian issues were causing distress, and an old grievance was looking for an outlet. Suddenly, in the large Jewish village of Nagartav (=Bereznegovatoje), a pogrom against the Jews arose. The Russian police often showed up a little too late for such cases, or perhaps they just did not want to see or help. For Jews in particular they did not have much mercy. The slogan of the blind masses was: "Beat the Jews and save Russia!” People took out their anger on the poor Jews. Terribly the whole [Jewish] village was completely destroyed.

Other Jewish villages were then also threatened and told that they would be next. Nagartav was 25 versts away from Sagradovka. Closer to the Mennonites, at a distance of 10 versts at most, were the two Jewish villages of Gross-Romanovka and Klein-Romanovka. The news of the pogrom in Nagartav had not yet reached our villages, when one Saturday morning the three villages of Alexanderfeld, Neu Schönsee and Friedensfeld were struck by a terrifying arrival. Like an avalanche, the inhabitants of Romanovka suddenly poured into these Mennonite villages in a great flight. Their wagons were loaded to the hilt with old men, women and children, as well as beds and various things.

None of us Germans suspected what was going on.

The women screamed, children cried, and shouts rang out: "Help! Save! Have mercy! Pogrom!" It was a panic parallel. But instincts of mercy and compassion knew what to do. In a few minutes the streets were empty: yards and houses and barns had opened their doors, and soon the frightened fugitives were under cover together with their wagons.

“Ask the Lord that your flight may not take place on the Sabbath day” [Matthew 24:20]. But it was Sabbath. In great anxiety they waited for the awful things that might come, but nothing happened. Outwardly everything remained silent. Only reconnaissance teams went through the streets from time to time and brought back reports to the mayoral offices. The day of terror slowly came to an end as nightfall arrived.

It was said that an order had been received that the Orloffer District Office should send out a guard of 500 men to Romanovka; however, the Oberschulze [Mennonite district mayor] refused, citing the Mennonite doctrine of non-resistance. Judgments and opinions differed.

By this point the Jews had heard that nothing disturbing had occurred in Romanovka thus far; it was still quiet. The next day—on Sunday—news came that the governor had arrived from Kherson with a detachment of Cossacks ... And the poor, frightened refugees returned to their abandoned homes that same day, comforted and rejoicing. This time they had escaped the worse with only a fright." (Note 8)

The Jewish community in this context knew that if its people had to flee for safety, then flee to the Mennonites.

Was this the norm or the exception? Here is another example from the Mennonitische Rundschau in 1882, suggesting that this was somewhat "natural" for Mennonites to do when pogroms arose, and that it came with a cost.

“Until now it appeared that in Russia Jews could find protection with German colonists from the raw persecution of Russians. This came naturally to us [Mennonites], for in our view it is not impossible that hatred could be stirred up against Germans as well. … 'Do unto others what you would have them do to you.' But now it is clear that this type of sympathy with Jews incites the hatred of the country’s population against Germans as well.” (Note 9)

To say that the relationship between Mennonites and Jews was "close" in Russia/Ukraine would be an exaggeration. And sadly there are other, less complimentary stories where—because of context—Mennonites were less able to be themselves. But these stories above and the instincts of the Mennonite community on behalf of their Jewish neighbours were not isolated or one-off. There are more such stories and they ring true to me—whether in urban contexts like Einlage or in the rural context of Sagradovka.


            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pics: Hermann Roskoschny, Rußland Land und Leute (Leipzig: Greßner und Schramm, 1883), vol. 1, https://archive.org/details/russland-land-und-leute-bd-1-1883/page/n7/mode/2up. Pics 2 and 3: https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/what-were-pogroms/, and https://eesiag.com/history/jewish-pogroms-in-the-south-of-ukraine-in-the-first-russian-revolution.html.

Note 1: See previous posts (forthcoming)

Note 2: On the “Black Hundred,” cf. http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CB%5CL%5CBlackHundreds.htm.

Note 3: Heinrich Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943: Ein Denkmal (Regina, SK: Self-published, 2008), 103; 93. See also idem, Einlage: Chronik des Dorfes Kitschkas, 1789–1943 (Saskatoon, SK: Self-published, 2010).

Note 4: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 103.

Note 5: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 103.

Note 6: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 103.

Note 7: Bergen, Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943, 93.

Note 8: Franz W. Martens, “Johann Köhn, Schulrat und Oberschulze: Biographisch-geschichtliche Mitteilungen aus der Nikolaifelder Mennonitengemeinde auf Sagradowka für das Mennonitische Archiv in Canada,” Mennonitische Rundschau 61, no. 25 (June 22, 1938), 9, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1938-06-22_61_25/page/8/.

Note 9: Mennonitische Rundschau 3, no. 6 (March 15, 1882), 3, https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1882-03-15_3_6/page/n1/mode/2up. The unnamed Mennonite correspondent continues the column with his own hateful language against these “lost sheep from the House of Israel”—which underlines again that the relationship was "complex."

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Anti-Jewish Pogroms and Mennonite responses in Einlage (1905) and Sagradovka (1899)," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), June 9, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/06/anti-jewish-pogroms-and-mennonite.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...
Post a Comment
Read more

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...
Post a Comment
Read more

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...
Post a Comment
Read more

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß";  note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...
Post a Comment
Read more