More Royal News! Mennonites give gifts of “Oxen, Butter, Ducks, Hens & Cheese” to new King (1772)

What do Mennonites offer a new king? The ritual ceremonies of homage to a new European king—as we see on TV these days--are ancient. Exactly 250 years yesterday, Frederick the Great became king over Mennonites in the Vistula River Delta where most of our ancestors lived. Here is how that played out.
On May 31, 1772, Heinrich Donner was elected elder of the Orlofferfelde Mennonite Church, 25 km north of Marienburg Castle in Polish-Prussia; thankfully he kept a diary (note 1). Only a few months later the weak Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth collapsed and was partitioned by powerful, land-hungry neighbours: Austria, Prussia and Catherine the Great’s empire. In the preceding decades Mennonites had lived with significant autonomy, felt secure under the Polish crown and could appeal to the king for protection. Now some 2,638 Mennonite families were under Prussian rule.
Frederick II took possession of his new lands on September 13, and then invited four persons of nobility plus clergy from each district to Marienburg for Sept. 27 to pay homage in a formal ceremony and recognize him as king; penalties were threatened for those who refused. The Marienburg Castle is only 7 kilometres from the Mennonite Heubuden Church. At the castle the Polish political elite (Szchlachta) took a pledge of loyalty and obedience, and in turn Frederick granted them the right to becomes members of the Prussian nobility (note 2).
Mennonites scrambled to prepare as well, and Donner records that “all Mennonite congregations” contributed to the large food gift of two fattened oxen, 400 pounds of butter, 50 ducks, 50 hens, and 20 wheels of cheese—a gift most appropriate to feed those gathering for the large Huldigung event (note 3). The gift not only symbolized Mennonite recognition of Fredrick’s sovereignty, but opened the door for Mennonites to deliver their own formal supplication for freedom of religion and freedom from military enlistment.
This was appropriate procedure and protocol. Historically at such an event, a new king promises his subjects protection and the preservation of their rights and privileges. For example in Frederick’s September 1772 “patent of possession,” the Protestant king granted Roman Catholics freedom of religion, and promised “to govern the whole country in such a way that the reasonable and well-thinking inhabitants may be happy and be content."
Mennonites received their response from the new rulership on October 6, 1772: “His Royal Majesty lets the Mennonite Congregation in Polish-Prussia know that …they are under supreme protection from any hindrances with regard to their religious practices. With regard to the “the enlistment of themselves and their children for soldiering in the regiments, this shall be decided shortly to their satisfaction … they will have to pay a yearly contribution, and then they can pursue their trade without disturbance.” (Note 4)
Mennonites were fundamentally opposed to military enlistment, and the new king agreed pragmatically that these subjects could serve his state “better as taxpayers and producers of goods than as soldiers” (note 5). The deal: in lieu of military service, Mennonites would be required to support the military with a large annual lump sum tax—enough to pay the majority capital portion and annual operating costs of a new military cadet school in Culm (note 6).
Moreover, because Prussian army conscription was not universal but canton-based, falling almost exclusively upon agricultural workers, the king also placed restrictions on Mennonite land acquisitions per canton as well. Frederick exerted only enough pressure on Mennonites to successfully increase their military tax obligations and to curtail their rates of land ownership, but not so much as to lose them as productive citizens. His heirs were less savvy or willing to negotiate—which would lead many Mennonites to consider the offers of the Catherine and immigration.
Finally, here is a petition and appeal by Donner and a ministerial colleague eight years later to the king. In 1780 they could not pay the large military tax because of the flooding of the Nogat River (note 7). Unfortunately the petition and appeal was unsuccessful (note 8).                                       
---
Most Sublime Great King, Most Gracious King and Lord.
[We trust] Your Royal Majesty will not take it amiss that we Mennonites of the two congregations of Orloff and Tiegenhagen, situated in the district of Tiegenhoff, take refuge in your throne in our extreme distress.
We have been ruined by the flooding of the Nogat River; some of our lands have silted over completely, and the rest have become unusable for this year. We still have our livestock from which we must feed ourselves in order to keep alive.
In this distress, on the 8th of April we made a humble presentation to the Royal West Prussian Chamber for the remission of the current year's amount payable for the cadet school, which affects our two congregations. However, we have received a decision in which our request for this and future years was completely rejected.
With great effort we made the first payment in the month of June. However the September deadline for the second is now approaching, and despite employing our full strengths, we are unable to meet it, because we are completely unable to earn our own bread.
For this reason, we take refuge in the throne of our Most Gracious King, humbly asking for a glimpse of Your gracious mercy, and to graciously waive the cadet school fee due from us this year. Most gracious King, we reverently honour the great mercies that Your Majesty has shown us in granting us the gracious Privilegium [charter of privileges]. However we also live in the firm hope that Your Majesty does not want us poor and lowly people to be put in the position of enjoying this grace only in prosperous times, but also in times of scarcity. This is our only consolation in our misery and we die waiting for a gracious hearing.
Your Royal Majesty's most humble servants,
Dirk Tiessen, Elder of the Tiegenhagen [Mennonite] Congregation
Heinrich Donner, Elder of the Orloff [Mennonite] Congregation
August 12, 1780, Tiegenhoff
								--Arnold Neufeldt-Fast
 
---Notes---
Note 1: Heinrich Donner and Johann Donner, Orlofferfelde Chronik, transcribed by Werner Janzen and edited by Merle Schlabough, 2022. From Mennonite Library and Archives-Bethel College, Prussian-Polish sources (online), https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/cong_303/ok63/orlofferfeldechronik.html.
Note 2: Cf. Walter Kuhn, Geschichte der deutschen Ostsiedlung in der Neuzeit, vol. 2: 15. bis 17. Jahrhundert (Graz: Böhlau, 1957), 89; for list of participants and background, see Max Bär, Westpreußen unter Friedrich dem Großen, vol. 2, Quellen (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1909), 737-763, https://pbc.gda.pl/dlibra/publication/379/edition/1971/content.
Note 3: Westpreußischer Adel 1772, Institut Deutsche Adelsforschung, https://adelsquellen.de/adelsforschung/huld.htm.
Note 4: Donner and Donner, Orlofferfelde Chronik.
Note 5: Gordon A. Craig, The Politics of the Prussian Army: 1640–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964), 22.
Note 6: Cf. Frederick II, “Mennonite Charter of Privileges, 1780,” in Mark Jantzen, Mennonite German Soldiers: Nation, Religion, and Family in the Prussian East, 1772–1880 (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010), 255.
Note 7: “Two copies of a letter to the mighty king and Lord, his majesty etc. etc. from ‘your most humble servants,’ the two congregations at Orloff and Tiegenhagen,” August 12, 1780, Dirk Tiessen, Elder, Tiegenhof, and Heinrich Donner, Elder, Orloff. Mennonite Library and Archives—Bethel College, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/V_18/00_Register/SKMBT_C35109030510350_0023.jpg.
Note 8: Donner and Donner, Orlofferfelde Chronik, 1780.

Comments

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws. It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Immigration to Canada, 1923: Background

In April 1921 Mennonites in the Caucasus and Don Region officially petitioned Moscow for permissions to emigrate—which Lenin had “flatly refused.” Their rationale was more than economic. “The disruption of economic conditions leads to impoverishment, which again goes hand in hand with the degradation of morals and has an alarming impact on our youth, who are also constantly exposed to the pressure of brutal and ruthless agitation on the part of those in power. … This decay of our spiritual and economic goods will only become greater and more ruinous.” ( Note 1 ) Later that year and some months before the large-scale feeding operations could begin in the Soviet Union, American Mennonite Relief (AMR) commissioner A.J. Miller petitioned the Soviet Embassy in London for exit permissions for 20,000 Mennonites ( note 1b) . He was unsuccessful. Nonetheless in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, key Mennonite leaders took a decision to work toward the re...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement! In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog